Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Rod photoreceptors control the ON vs OFF polarity of cone-signaling neurons
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 March 2026

Rod photoreceptors control the ON vs OFF polarity of cone-signaling neurons

  • Deborah Langrill Beaudoin1 na1,
  • Abdul Rhman Hassan1 na1,
  • Angela Shehu1,
  • Jeremy M. Bohl1,
  • Yumiko Umino2,
  • Eduardo C. Solessio  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7749-43662,
  • Seongho Kim3,4,
  • Chase B. Hellmer1 &
  • …
  • Tomomi Ichinose  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9233-97621,5 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 755 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Membrane potential
  • Neurophysiology
  • Retina

Abstract

A fundamental feature of the visual system is its ability to detect image contrast. The contrast processing starts in the first synapse of the retina where parallel pathways are established to compute contrast to bright (ON pathway) and dark (OFF pathway) objects, separately transferred to morphologically identified ON and OFF cells throughout the visual system. Here, we found that response polarity in ON and OFF neurons is not fixed but rather switches dynamically to the opposite polarity. The switch was not observed in rod-knockout mice, indicating that rods generate the polarity switch. We determined that neither horizontal cells nor rod-signaling pathways were responsible for the switch. Instead, we discovered that EAAT5 glutamate transporters located at photoreceptor terminals were required to produce the polarity switch. Our findings exhibit the plasticity of ON-OFF coding in retinal interneurons and their ability to encode contrast across the visual dynamic range.

Similar content being viewed by others

The temporal progression of retinal degeneration and early-stage idebenone treatment in the Pde6brd1/rd1 mouse model of retinal dystrophy

Article Open access 23 January 2024

An ethologically relevant paradigm to assess defensive response to looming visual contrast stimuli

Article Open access 31 May 2024

A membrane-targeted photoswitch restores physiological ON/OFF responses to light in the degenerate retina

Article Open access 11 January 2025

Data availability

Supplementary Data 1 includes all source data and is provided with this paper. Any additional data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Famiglietti, E. V. Jr., Kaneko, A. & Tachibana, M. Neuronal architecture of on and off pathways to ganglion cells in carp retina. Science 198, 1267–1269 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Famiglietti, E. V. Jr. & Kolb, H. Structural basis for ON-and OFF-center responses in retinal ganglion cells. Science 194, 193–195 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wu, S. M., Gao, F. & Maple, B. R. Functional architecture of synapses in the inner retina: segregation of visual signals by stratification of bipolar cell axon terminals. J. Neurosci. 20, 4462–4470 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ichinose, T., Fyk-Kolodziej, B. & Cohn, J. Roles of ON cone bipolar cell subtypes in temporal coding in the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 34, 8761–8771 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ichinose, T. & Hellmer, C. B. Differential signalling and glutamate receptor compositions in the OFF bipolar cell types in the mouse retina. J. Physiol. 594, 883–894 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baden, T. et al. The functional diversity of retinal ganglion cells in the mouse. Nature 529, 345–350 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baden, T., Berens, P., Bethge, M. & Euler, T. Spikes in mammalian bipolar cells support temporal layering of the inner retina. Curr. Biol. 23, 48–52 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Borghuis, B. G., Marvin, J. S., Looger, L. L. & Demb, J. B. Two-photon imaging of nonlinear glutamate release dynamics at bipolar cell synapses in the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 33, 10972–10985 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Szikra, T. et al. Rods in daylight act as relay cells for cone-driven horizontal cell-mediated surround inhibition. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1728–1735 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vlasits, A. L. et al. A role for synaptic input distribution in a dendritic computation of motion direction in the retina. Neuron 89, 1317–1330 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ozaita, A. et al. A unique role for Kv3 voltage-gated potassium channels in starburst amacrine cell signaling in mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 24, 7335–7343 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Perez De Sevilla Muller, L., Shelley, J. & Weiler, R. Displaced amacrine cells of the mouse retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 505, 177–189 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vlasits, A. L. et al. Visual stimulation switches the polarity of excitatory input to starburst amacrine cells. Neuron 83, 1172–1184 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou, Z. J. & Fain, G. L. Neurotransmitter receptors of starburst amacrine cells in rabbit retinal slices. J. Neurosci. 15, 5334–5345 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wassle, H. et al. Glycinergic transmission in the mammalian retina. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2, 6 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jain, V. et al. Gain control by sparse, ultra-slow glycinergic synapses. Cell Rep. 38, 110410 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Grzywacz, N. M. & Zucker, C. L. Modeling Starburst cells’ GABA(B) receptors and their putative role in motion sensitivity. Biophys. J. 91, 473–486 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lukasiewicz, P. D., Maple, B. R. & Werblin, F. S. A novel GABA receptor on bipolar cell terminals in the tiger salamander retina. J. Neurosci. 14, 1202–1212 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Slaughter, M. M. & Miller, R. F. An excitatory amino acid antagonist blocks cone input to sign-conserving second-order retinal neurons. Science 219, 1230–1232 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davenport, C. M., Detwiler, P. B. & Dacey, D. M. Effects of pH buffering on horizontal and ganglion cell light responses in primate retina: evidence for the proton hypothesis of surround formation. J. Neurosci. 28, 456–464 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bohl, J. M., Shehu, A., Hellmer, C. B. & Ichinose, T. Patch clamp recording from bipolar cells in the wholemount mouse retina. STAR Protoc. 3, 101482 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hellmer, C. B. et al. Cholinergic feedback to bipolar cells contributes to motion detection in the mouse retina. Cell Rep. 37, 110106 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pasquale, R., Umino, Y. & Solessio, E. Rod photoreceptors signal fast changes in daylight levels using a Cx36-independent retinal pathway in mouse. J. Neurosci. 40, 796–810 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Calvert, P. D. et al. Membrane protein diffusion sets the speed of rod phototransduction. Nature 411, 90–94 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hirano, A. A., Hack, I., Wassle, H. & Duvoisin, R. M. Cloning and immunocytochemical localization of a cyclic nucleotide-gated channel alpha-subunit to all cone photoreceptors in the mouse retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 421, 80–94 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Seeliger, M. W. et al. New views on RPE65 deficiency: the rod system is the source of vision in a mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis. Nat. Genet. 29, 70–74 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ronning, K. E. et al. Loss of cone function without degeneration in a novel Gnat2 knock-out mouse. Exp. Eye Res. 171, 111–118 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ishibashi, M. et al. Analysis of rod/cone gap junctions from the reconstruction of mouse photoreceptor terminals. eLife 11, e73039 (2022).

  29. Thoreson, W. B., Sladek, A. L., Barta, C. L. & Townsend, L. E. Rod inputs arrive at horizontal cell somas in mouse retina solely via rod-cone coupling. eNeuro 12, ENEURO.0427-24.2025 (2025).

  30. Mills, S. L. & Massey, S. C. A series of biotinylated tracers distinguishes three types of gap junction in retina. J. Neurosci. 20, 8629–8636 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xin, D. & Bloomfield, S. A. Dark- and light-induced changes in coupling between horizontal cells in mammalian retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 405, 75–87 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Peichl, L. & Gonzalez-Soriano, J. Morphological types of horizontal cell in rodent retinae: a comparison of rat, mouse, gerbil, and guinea pig. Vis. Neurosci. 11, 501–517 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kamermans, M. et al. Hemichannel-mediated inhibition in the outer retina. Science 292, 1178–1180 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hirasawa, H. & Kaneko, A. pH changes in the invaginating synaptic cleft mediate feedback from horizontal cells to cone photoreceptors by modulating Ca2+ channels. J. Gen. Physiol. 122, 657–671 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Vessey, J. P. et al. Proton-mediated feedback inhibition of presynaptic calcium channels at the cone photoreceptor synapse. J. Neurosci. 25, 4108–4117 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Warren, T. J., Van Hook, M. J., Supuran, C. T. & Thoreson, W. B. Sources of protons and a role for bicarbonate in inhibitory feedback from horizontal cells to cones in Ambystoma tigrinum retina. J. Physiol. 594, 6661–6677 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chaffiol, A., Ishii, M., Cao, Y. & Mangel, S. C. Dopamine regulation of GABAA receptors contributes to light/dark modulation of the ON-cone bipolar cell receptive field surround in the retina. Curr. Biol. 27, 2600–2609.e2604 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jackman, S. L., Babai, N., Chambers, J. J., Thoreson, W. B. & Kramer, R. H. A positive feedback synapse from retinal horizontal cells to cone photoreceptors. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001057 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nelson, R., Bender, A. M. & Connaughton, V. P. Stimulation of sodium pump restores membrane potential to neurons excited by glutamate in zebrafish distal retina. J. Physiol. 549, 787–800 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Yang, J. H., Maple, B., Gao, F., Maguire, G. & Wu, S. M. Postsynaptic responses of horizontal cells in the tiger salamander retina are mediated by AMPA-preferring receptors. Brain Res. 797, 125–134 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Puller, C., Ivanova, E., Euler, T., Haverkamp, S. & Schubert, T. OFF bipolar cells express distinct types of dendritic glutamate receptors in the mouse retina. Neuroscience 243, 136–148 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wersinger, E. et al. The glutamate transporter EAAT5 works as a presynaptic receptor in mouse rod bipolar cells. J. Physiol. 577, 221–234 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lukasiewicz, P. D., Bligard, G. W. & DeBrecht, J. D. EAAT5 glutamate transporter-mediated inhibition in the vertebrate retina. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 15, 1–5 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hasegawa, J., Obara, T., Tanaka, K. & Tachibana, M. High-density presynaptic transporters are required for glutamate removal from the first visual synapse. Neuron 50, 63–74 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Veruki, M. L., Morkve, S. H. & Hartveit, E. Activation of a presynaptic glutamate transporter regulates synaptic transmission through electrical signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 1388–1396 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ichinose, T. & Lukasiewicz, P. D. The mode of retinal presynaptic inhibition switches with light intensity. J. Neurosci. 32, 4360–4371 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Arriza, J. L., Eliasof, S., Kavanaugh, M. P. & Amara, S. G. Excitatory amino acid transporter 5, a retinal glutamate transporter coupled to a chloride conductance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4155–4160 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Borghuis, B. G., Looger, L. L., Tomita, S. & Demb, J. B. Kainate receptors mediate signaling in both transient and sustained OFF bipolar cell pathways in mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 34, 6128–6139 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pearring, J. N. et al. A role for nyctalopin, a small leucine-rich repeat protein, in localizing the TRP melastatin 1 channel to retinal depolarizing bipolar cell dendrites. J. Neurosci. 31, 10060–10066 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Morgans, C. W. et al. TRPM1 is required for the depolarizing light response in retinal ON-bipolar cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19174–19178 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Koike, C. et al. TRPM1 is a component of the retinal ON bipolar cell transduction channel in the mGluR6 cascade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 332–337 (2010).

  52. Euler, T., Haverkamp, S., Schubert, T. & Baden, T. Retinal bipolar cells: elementary building blocks of vision. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 507–519 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Pang, J. J., Gao, F. & Wu, S. M. Light-evoked excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs to ON and OFF alpha ganglion cells in the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 23, 6063–6073 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Ichinose, T. & Habib, S. ON and OFF signaling pathways in the retina and the visual system. Front. Ophthalmol. 2, 989002 (2022).

  55. Pearson, J. T. & Kerschensteiner, D. Ambient illumination switches contrast preference of specific retinal processing streams. J. Neurophysiol. 114, 540–550 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Tikidji-Hamburyan, A. et al. Retinal output changes qualitatively with every change in ambient illuminance. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 66–74 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Rivlin-Etzion, M., Wei, W. & Feller, M. B. Visual stimulation reverses the directional preference of direction-selective retinal ganglion cells. Neuron 76, 518–525 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ankri, L., Ezra-Tsur, E., Maimon, S. R., Kaushansky, N. & Rivlin-Etzion, M. Antagonistic center-surround mechanisms for direction selectivity in the retina. Cell Rep. 31, 107608 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Jin, N. et al. Genetic elimination of rod/cone coupling reveals the contribution of the secondary rod pathway to the retinal output. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm4491 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Behrens, C. et al. Retinal horizontal cells use different synaptic sites for global feedforward and local feedback signaling. Curr. Biol. 32, 545–558.e5 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lukasiewicz, P. D., Bligard, G. W. & DeBrecht, J. EAAT5 glutamate transporter-mediated inhibition in the vertebrate retina. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 15, 1–6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Szmajda, B. A. & Devries, S. H. Glutamate spillover between mammalian cone photoreceptors. J. Neurosci. 31, 13431–13441 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Thoreson, W. B. & Chhunchha, B. EAAT5 glutamate transporter rapidly binds glutamate with micromolar affinity in mouse rods. J. Gen. Physiol. 155, e202313349 (2023).

  64. Ingram, N. T., Sampath, A. P. & Fain, G. L. Voltage-clamp recordings of light responses from wild-type and mutant mouse cone photoreceptors. J. Gen. Physiol. 151, 1287–1299 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Vroman, R. & Kamermans, M. Feedback-induced glutamate spillover enhances negative feedback from horizontal cells to cones. J. Physiol. 593, 2927–2940 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Wong, K. Y., Cohen, E. D. & Dowling, J. E. Retinal bipolar cell input mechanisms in giant danio. II. Patch-clamp analysis of on bipolar cells. J. Neurophysiol. 93, 94–107 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Tse, D. Y., Chung, I. & Wu, S. M. Possible roles of glutamate transporter EAAT5 in mouse cone depolarizing bipolar cell light responses. Vis. Res. 103, 63–74 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Makino, C. L. et al. Recoverin regulates light-dependent phosphodiesterase activity in retinal rods. J. Gen. Physiol. 123, 729–741 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hurley, J. B. & Chen, J. Evaluation of the contributions of recoverin and GCAPs to rod photoreceptor light adaptation and recovery to the dark state. Prog. Brain Res. 131, 395–405 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Yin, L., Smith, R. G., Sterling, P. & Brainard, D. H. Chromatic properties of horizontal and ganglion cell responses follow a dual gradient in cone opsin expression. J. Neurosci. 26, 12351–12361 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Tikidji-Hamburyan, A. et al. Rods progressively escape saturation to drive visual responses in daylight conditions. Nat. Commun. 8, 1813 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Frederiksen, R. et al. Rod photoreceptors avoid saturation in bright light by the movement of the G protein transducin. J. Neurosci. 41, 3320–3330 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Calvert, P. D. et al. Phototransduction in transgenic mice after targeted deletion of the rod transducin alpha-subunit. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13913–13918 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Jin, N. et al. Molecular and functional architecture of the mouse photoreceptor network. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba7232 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Kuznetsov, K. I., Grygorov, O. O., Maslov, V. Y., Veselovsky, N. S. & Fedulova, S. A. Kv3 channels modulate calcium signals induced by fast firing patterns in the rat retinal ganglion cells. Cell Calcium 52, 405–411 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Babai, N. & Thoreson, W. B. Horizontal cell feedback regulates calcium currents and intracellular calcium levels in rod photoreceptors of salamander and mouse retina. J. Physiol. 587, 2353–2364 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Ghosh, K. K., Bujan, S., Haverkamp, S., Feigenspan, A. & Wassle, H. Types of bipolar cells in the mouse retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 469, 70–82 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Tu, H. Y., Hsu, C. C., Chen, Y. J. & Chen, C. K. Patch clamp recording of starburst amacrine cells in a flat-mount preparation of deafferentated mouse retina. J. Vis. Exp. 116, 54608 (2016).

  79. Zhou, Z. J. Direct participation of starburst amacrine cells in spontaneous rhythmic activities in the developing mammalian retina. J. Neurosci. 18, 4155 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Drs. Dao-Qi Zhang and Samar Hattar for providing photoreceptor KO mice. The authors also thank Dr. Manoranjan Santra for genotyping support and Mr. Bashir Khatib-Shahidi and Mr. Goichi Suganuma for technical assistance. The authors are grateful to generous research funding: NIH EY028915 (T.I.), NIH EY032917 (T.I.), NIH EY004068 (Vision Core), Rumble Fellowship (J.M.B.), and RPB grant.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Deborah Langrill Beaudoin, Abdul Rhman Hassan.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Visual and Anatomical Sciences, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA

    Deborah Langrill Beaudoin, Abdul Rhman Hassan, Angela Shehu, Jeremy M. Bohl, Chase B. Hellmer & Tomomi Ichinose

  2. Department of Ophthalmology and Center for Vision Research, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA

    Yumiko Umino & Eduardo C. Solessio

  3. Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA

    Seongho Kim

  4. Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Core, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA

    Seongho Kim

  5. Department of Pharmacology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA

    Tomomi Ichinose

Authors
  1. Deborah Langrill Beaudoin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdul Rhman Hassan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Angela Shehu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeremy M. Bohl
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yumiko Umino
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eduardo C. Solessio
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Seongho Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chase B. Hellmer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tomomi Ichinose
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.B.H. and T.I. were responsible for conceptualizing the study. D.L.B., A.R.H., A.S., J.M.B., and C.B.H. performed a patch clamp study and analyzed data. D.L.B. and S.K performed statistical analysis. Y.U. and E.C.S. advised on light adaptations and provided photoreceptor mutant mouse analysis. T.I. wrote the original manuscript. D.L.B., A.R.H., A.S., and C.B.H. generated figures. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomomi Ichinose.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks Takeshi Yoshimatsu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Benjamin Bessieres. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download DOCX )

Supplementary Data (download XLSX )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beaudoin, D.L., Hassan, A.R., Shehu, A. et al. Rod photoreceptors control the ON vs OFF polarity of cone-signaling neurons. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09885-4

Download citation

  • Received: 04 June 2025

  • Accepted: 06 March 2026

  • Published: 19 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09885-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing