Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Biology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications biology
  3. articles
  4. article
Genomic insights into antimicrobial resistance in ocular pathogens from India
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 April 2026

Genomic insights into antimicrobial resistance in ocular pathogens from India

  • Vanitha Shyamili Kumar1 na1,
  • Apuratha Pandiyan1 na1,
  • Rakeshpal Bhagat1,
  • Arvind Kumar  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0000-4557-65541,2,
  • Reuben Jacob Mathew1,
  • Sreenivas Ara1,
  • Ankita Ramdas Punde  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0005-7235-18321,
  • Likhita Laveti3,
  • Aruna Panda1,
  • Bhupesh Bagga3,
  • Vinay Kumar Nandicoori1,2,4,
  • Prashant Garg  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-28153,
  • Divya Tej Sowpati  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-60111,2,
  • Joveeta Joseph  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8421-19773 &
  • …
  • Karthik Bharadwaj Tallapaka  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0386-22661,2 

Communications Biology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bacterial genes
  • Eye diseases

Abstract

Ocular infections have a substantial impact on global visual health. Despite their association with severe vision impairment, very few studies have systematically monitored antimicrobial resistance (AMR) over time using whole genome sequencing approaches. In the current study, we assembled 291 high-fidelity bacterial genomes isolated from patients attending a tertiary eye care centre in India, using long-read sequencing. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 62) and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 60) were the most common pathogens in the cohort, with more than 45% of isolates exhibiting multidrug resistance and more than 15% classified as extensively drug-resistant. Genotype–phenotype analyses and multilocus sequence typing revealed a previously unreported mecA-negative methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain, ST9578, resistant to vancomycin and teicoplanin. Potential AMR mechanisms, like a mutation in the 23S rRNA gene associated with linezolid resistance and a KorB-like protein-encoding gene associated with fluoroquinolone resistance, were identified using comparative genomics. This is the first large-scale genomic surveillance effort focused on ocular pathogens in the Indian subcontinent and the potential AMR mechanisms and sequence types identified underscore the need for larger such studies in low-and-middle-income countries.

Data availability

All genomes assembled as part of this work are openly available to researchers across the world and can be accessed at NCBI (PRJNA1267791) and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1899625467. The source data used for generating the figures is available in the folder ‘Supplementary data 10’ provided along with this paper.

Code availability

The custom Python scripts are available at https://github.com/apuratha/ocular-amr, https://github.com/Shyamili09/ARGs-Antibiogram-comparison and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1900054968.

References

  1. Naghavi, M. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet 404, 1199–1226 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Murray, C. J. L. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399, 629–655 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ikuta, K. S. et al. Global mortality associated with 33 bacterial pathogens in 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 400, 2221–2248 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Snyder, R. W. & Glasser, D. B. Antibiotic therapy for ocular infection. West. J. Med. 161, 579–584 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ho, C. S. et al. Antimicrobial resistance: a concise update. Lancet Microbe 6, (2025).

  6. Asbell, P. A. et al. Antibiotic resistance among ocular pathogens in the United States: five-year results from the Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring in Ocular Microorganisms (ARMOR) Surveillance Study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 133, 1445–1454 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Asbell, P. A., Sanfilippo, C. M. & DeCory, H. H. Antibiotic resistance of bacterial pathogens isolated from the conjunctiva in the Antibiotic Resistance Monitoring in Ocular Microorganisms (ARMOR) surveillance study (2009–2021). Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 108, 116069 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miranda, S. W., André, C., Bispo, P. J. M. & Gilmore, M. S. Whole genome analysis of ocular pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates reveals genetic diversity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 66, 58 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kandasamy, K. et al. Comparative genomics of ocular Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from keratitis patients with different clinical outcomes. Genomics 112, 4769–4776 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cabrera-Aguas, M., Chidi-Egboka, N., Kandel, H. & Watson, S. L. Antimicrobial resistance in ocular infection: A review. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 52, 258–275 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Das, A. V. & Joseph, J. The landscape of bacterial antibiotic susceptibility in a multi-tier ophthalmology network in India: an electronic medical record-driven analytics report. J. Med. Microbiol. 71, e001598 (2022).

  12. Ting, D. S. J., Ho, C. S., Deshmukh, R., Said, D. G. & Dua, H. S. Infectious keratitis: an update on epidemiology, causative microorganisms, risk factors, and antimicrobial resistance. Eye Lond. Engl. 35, 1084–1101 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gandepalli, L. et al. Microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance trends of preoperative conjunctival swabs: An 8-year retrospective analysis from a North Indian tertiary care ophthalmic center. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 74, 98–103 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xu, Y. et al. Etiological characteristics of 3,691 cases of microbial keratitis: an 8-year longitudinal study. Microbiol. Spectr. 13, e02630-24 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ceylan, A. et al. Microbiological profile and antibiotic susceptibility results in corneal samples: Sharing 4-year data. Eur. Eye Res. 5, 138–144 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Drago, L. et al. Antibiotic resistance profiles in eye infections: a local concern with a retrospective focus on a large hospital in Northern Italy. Microorganisms 12, 984 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Asbell, P. A., Sanfilippo, C. M., Sahm, D. F. & DeCory, H. H. Trends in antibiotic resistance among ocular microorganisms in the United States From 2009 to 2018. JAMA Ophthalmol. 138, 439–450 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wheeler, N. E. et al. Innovations in genomic antimicrobial resistance surveillance. Lancet Microbe 4, e1063–e1070 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Okeke, I. N. et al. The scope of the antimicrobial resistance challenge. Lancet Lond. Engl. 403, 2426–2438 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jesudason, T. WHO publishes updated list of bacterial priority pathogens. Lancet Microbe 5, 100940 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baker, K. S. et al. Evidence review and recommendations for the implementation of genomics for antimicrobial resistance surveillance: reports from an international expert group. Lancet Microbe 4, e1035–e1039 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jauneikaite, E. et al. Genomics for antimicrobial resistance surveillance to support infection prevention and control in health-care facilities. Lancet Microbe 4, e1040–e1046 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Djordjevic, S. P. et al. Genomic surveillance for antimicrobial resistance - a One Health perspective. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 142–157 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, W., Chen, T., Zhou, Q. & Xu, J. Resistance to linezolid in Staphylococcus aureus by mutation, modification, and acquisition of genes. J. Antibiot. 78, 4–13 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, C. A. & Thomas, C. M. Deletion mapping of kil and kor functions in the trfA and trfB regions of broad host range plasmid RK2. Mol. Gen. Genet. MGG 190, 245–254 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  26. McLean, T. C. et al. KorB switching from DNA-sliding clamp to repressor mediates long-range gene silencing in a multi-drug resistance plasmid. Nat. Microbiol. 10, 448–467 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kostelidou, K. & Thomas, C. M. The hierarchy of KorB binding at its 12 binding sites on the broad-host-range plasmid RK2 and modulation of this binding by IncC1 protein. J. Mol. Biol. 295, 411–422 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson, W. L. et al. Genomics of Staphylococcus aureus ocular isolates. PLoS One 16, e0250975 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. André, C. et al. Microbiology of eye infections at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear: an 8-year retrospective review combined with genomic epidemiology. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 255, 43–56 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yuan, H. et al. The global antimicrobial resistance trends of Staphylococcus aureus and Influencing Factors. Microbiol. Res. 16, 118 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao, H. et al. Phenotypic and genomic analysis of the hypervirulent ST22 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in China. mSystems 8, e0124222 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yamaguchi, T. et al. Evolutionary dynamics of the novel ST22-PT methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone co-harbouring Panton–Valentine leucocidin and duplicated toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 genes. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 30, 779–786 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Guo, Y. et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals resistance mechanisms and molecular epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections. BMC Microbiol. 25, 679 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li, J. et al. Molecular characterization of extensively drug-resistant hypervirulent Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in China. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 23, 13 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Li, Z. et al. Molecular genetic analysis of an XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa ST664 clone carrying multiple conjugal plasmids. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 75, 1443–1452 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bakthavatchalam, Y. D., Anandan, S. & Veeraraghavan, B. Laboratory detection and clinical implication of oxacillinase-48 like carbapenemase: the hidden threat. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 8, 41–50 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shaidullina, E. R. et al. Genomic analysis of the international high-risk clonal lineage Klebsiella pneumoniae sequence type 395. Genome Med. 15, 9 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rolbiecki, D. et al. Genomic and metagenomic analysis reveals shared resistance genes and mobile genetic elements in E. coli and Klebsiella spp. isolated from hospital patients and hospital wastewater at intra- and inter-genus level. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 261, 114423 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liu, C. et al. Emergence and Inter- and Intrahost Evolution of Pandrug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Coharboring tmexCD1-toprJ1, blaNDM-1, and blaKPC-2. Microbiol. Spectr. 11, e02786–22 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou, H. et al. Genomic census of invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella infections reveals global and local human-to-human transmission. Nat. Med. 31, 2325–2334 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, W. et al. Resistance to linezolid in Staphylococcus aureus by mutation, modification, and acquisition of genes. J. Antibiot. 78, 4–13 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  42. De Coster, W. & Rademakers, R. NanoPack2: population-scale evaluation of long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 39, btad311 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wood, D. E., Lu, J. & Langmead, B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 20, 257 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Koren, S. et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 27, 722–736 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, A. Y., Gao, M. & Chong, Z. Accurate long-read de novo assembly evaluation with Inspector. Genome Biol. 22, 312 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T. & Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 9, 5114 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jolley, K. A., Bray, J. E. & Maiden, M. C. J. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res. 3, 124 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Alcock, B. P. et al. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D690–D699 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Camargo, A. P. et al. Identification of mobile genetic elements with geNomad. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1303–1312 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Carattoli, A. & Hasman, H. PlasmidFinder and In Silico pMLST: identification and typing of plasmid replicons in Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS). Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ 2075, 285–294 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  55. McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PloS One 8, e61217 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jacomy, M., Venturini, T., Heymann, S. & Bastian, M. ForceAtlas2, a continuous graph layout algorithm for handy network visualization designed for the Gephi software. PloS One 9, e98679 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Grant, J. R. et al. Proksee: in-depth characterization and visualization of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, W484–W492 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Shetty, S. A. & Lahti, L. Microbiome data science. J. Biosci. 44, 115 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Seemann, T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Page, A. J. et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 31, 3691–3693 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 30, 1312–1313 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W256–W259 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kaya, H. et al. SCCmecFinder, a web-based tool for typing of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec in Staphylococcus aureus using whole-genome sequence data. mSphere 3, e00612–17 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Le, D. Q. et al. AMRomics: a scalable workflow to analyze large microbial genome collections. BMC Genomics 25, 709 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Schliep, K. P. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 27, 592–593 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Tallapaka, K. Genomic insights into antimicrobial resistance in ocular pathogens from India [Data Set]. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18996254

  68. Tallapaka, K. Genomic insights into antimicrobial resistance in ocular pathogens from India. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19000549.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was made possible by funding from the Rockefeller Foundation (Grant 2021 HTH 018). We acknowledge Prof. L S Shashidhara for his guidance. Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation (HERF) for facilitating project execution. The HPC facility of CCMB is acknowledged for providing computational resources for data analysis.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Vanitha Shyamili Kumar, Apuratha Pandiyan.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India

    Vanitha Shyamili Kumar, Apuratha Pandiyan, Rakeshpal Bhagat, Arvind Kumar, Reuben Jacob Mathew, Sreenivas Ara, Ankita Ramdas Punde, Aruna Panda, Vinay Kumar Nandicoori, Divya Tej Sowpati & Karthik Bharadwaj Tallapaka

  2. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India

    Arvind Kumar, Vinay Kumar Nandicoori, Divya Tej Sowpati & Karthik Bharadwaj Tallapaka

  3. Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, Hyderabad Eye Research Foundation, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India

    Likhita Laveti, Bhupesh Bagga, Prashant Garg & Joveeta Joseph

  4. National Institute of Immunology, New Delhi, India

    Vinay Kumar Nandicoori

Authors
  1. Vanitha Shyamili Kumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Apuratha Pandiyan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rakeshpal Bhagat
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arvind Kumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Reuben Jacob Mathew
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sreenivas Ara
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ankita Ramdas Punde
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Likhita Laveti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Aruna Panda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Bhupesh Bagga
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Vinay Kumar Nandicoori
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Prashant Garg
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Divya Tej Sowpati
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Joveeta Joseph
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Karthik Bharadwaj Tallapaka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.B.T., J.J. and D.T.S. conceived and designed the study. B.B. & P.G. clinically examined the patients. L.L. performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing and DNA extraction. R.B. and S.A. carried out library preparation and sequencing. V.S.K., A.R.P., A.K. and R.J.M. conducted the bioinformatics analysis. A.P. performed comparative genome analysis. V.S.K. prepared the first draft of the manuscript, which was reviewed and edited by K.B.T., J.J., D.T.S., P.G., B.B. and V.K.N. Ar.P. was responsible for project management. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Divya Tej Sowpati, Joveeta Joseph or Karthik Bharadwaj Tallapaka.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Tobias Goris and George Inglis. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1-9 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 10 (download ZIP )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, V.S., Pandiyan, A., Bhagat, R. et al. Genomic insights into antimicrobial resistance in ocular pathogens from India. Commun Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09952-w

Download citation

  • Received: 26 June 2025

  • Accepted: 18 March 2026

  • Published: 03 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-026-09952-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Aims & Scope

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Biology (Commun Biol)

ISSN 2399-3642 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing