Introduction

Cross-dehydrogenation coupling (CDC), a type of chemical bond construction by direct dehydrogenation, has emerged as an important approach in chemical synthesis because of its excellent efficiency, atomic economy, and wide substrate scope1,2,3,4. Catalysts based on transition metals such as copper, iron, ruthenium, and manganese are typically used in CDC reactions5,6,7. However, issues associated with these metallic catalysts, such as high cost, harsh reaction conditions, toxicity, and metal residues, have restricted their application in organic synthesis8,9. Therefore, the development of efficient, simple, environmentally friendly, and metal-free CDC reactions has become a major trend10.

In 1985, the Masui group first applied N-hydroxyphthalimide (NHPI) as a metal-free oxidant to the oxidation of olefins via a free radical reaction11. The ‘non-persistent’ nitrogen-oxygen radical, i.e. phthalimide nitrogen-oxygen (PINO) radical12, is often used to activate inert hydrocarbon bonds due to its high activity13. Moreover, oxygen-substituted NHPI derivatives could be converted into alkoxyamines via hydrazinolysis14. Alkoxyamines can be further used to synthesize new cephalosporins, oxiconazoles, glucokinase activators, and other organic compounds with antibacterial activity15,16,17. Disadvantages of conventional synthetic methods for accessing these compounds include poor atom economy, tedious synthetic procedures, and unsatisfactory selectivity. Recent researches on the CDC reactions involving NHPI have focused mainly on activated C(sp3)–H bonds. Reaction sites are typically at benzylic positions or at the α position of carbonyl moieties or ethers18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39. The CDC reaction between NHPI and alkanes with inert C(sp3)–H bonds has rarely been studied, and only few examples have been reported so far (Fig. 1)40,41,42,43. For example, copper nitrate trihydrate-catalyzed functionalization of C(sp3)–H bonds adjacent to the oxygen atoms of ethers was realized with oxygen as the co-oxidant in 201737. Functionalization either α- to the oxygen atom of ethers or at the benzylic position of benzyl derivatives was accomplished with tetrabutylammonium iodide and tert-butylhydroperoxide under sonication31. It is noteworthy that the substrates in the previous reports did not involve acyclic alkanes or nitriles, and transition metal catalysts or superstoichiometric quantities of (volatile, toxic and explosive) tert-butylhydroperoxide were often required.

Fig. 1: Cross-dehydrogenative C–O coupling using NHPI.
Fig. 1: Cross-dehydrogenative C–O coupling using NHPI.
Full size image

a Approaches for the cross-coupling reactions under transition metal catalyst or tert-butylhydroperoxide. b Cross-dehydrogenative C–O coupling reaction of N-hydroxyphthalimide with unactivated C(sp3)–H by using iodobenzene diacetate. c Structures of cephalosporin and glucokinase activator.

Hypervalent iodine can be used as an initiator to trigger various chemical reactions, functioning like a transition metal catalyst, and this reagent has been widely applied to drug synthesis and total synthesis of natural products44,45,46,47,48. Considering the potential value of R–ONH2 compounds, we herein report an approach to constructing C–O bonds in unactivated alkanes, cyanides, ethers, and thioethers via a CDC reaction with NHPI in the presence of iodobenzene diacetate as a radical initiator (Fig. 1). The current method features a number of advantages, such as mild metal-free reaction conditions, high synthetic efficiency, environmentally friendliness, and applicability to a wide range of substrates.

Results and discussion

Reaction optimization

The project was commenced with the reaction of cyclohexane with NHPI at room temperature, in which the effect of oxidants [tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP), PhI(OCOCF3)2, H2O2, and PhI(OAc)2] was investigated (Table 1, entries 1–5). The NHPI derivative 3 was formed in 40% yield only when PhI(OAc)2 was applied as the oxidant (entry 5). The solvents [chloroform, water, N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE), acetonitrile (MeCN), ethyl acetate (EA), chlorobenzene (PhCl), dichloromethane (DCM), and benzene (PhH)] were next screened (entries 6–14). When PhI(OAc)2 was used as the oxidant, DCM (entry 13) and benzene (entry 14) gave the best results. The reaction with PhI(OCOCF3)2 as the oxidant in DCM and PhH was then investigated, and the desired product 3 was obtained in 42 and 49% yield, respectively (entries 15, 16). The influence of the temperature (0 oC and 60 oC) on the reaction was examined with DCM as the solvent and PhI(OAc)2 as the oxidant, and no better result was obtained (entries 17, 18). Notably, when DCM was used as the solvent, compound 4 was formed (15%) along with 3; the formation of 4 was obviously due to the reaction of the solvent molecule itself with NHPI (see Fig. 2 for the structure). The bond dissociation enthalpies (BDEs) for cyclohexane (cyclohexane-H) and DCM (DCM-H) were calculated by Gaussian 16 at B3LYP/6-31 G basis set level and found to be 402.3 and 416.5 kJ mol−1, respectively, which indicates that cyclohexane should be slightly more prone to undergo this kind of reaction.

Table 1 Optimisation of the reaction conditionsa.
Fig. 2: Reaction of DCM with NHPI.
Fig. 2: Reaction of DCM with NHPI.
Full size image

DCM as both the solvent and the substrate.

When the reaction was performed with DCM as both the solvent and the substrate, compound 4 was obtained in 50% yield (Fig. 2). Although no additional coupling products were produced when benzene was adopted as the solvent, considering the toxicity of benzene, DCM was chosen as the solvent for most of the subsequent experiments.

Substrate scope

The substrate scope was then explored under the optimal reaction conditions obtained (see Table 1, entry 15), and the experimental results are summarized in Fig. 3. First, the reactions of the cycloalkanes with NHPI were investigated. The C–O CDC reactions of cyclopentane, cycloheptane, and amantadine with NHPI proceeded smoothly and afforded compounds (57) in the yields of 55–85%. It should be mentioned that no reports have been disclosed concerning this kind of C–H activation for acyclic alkanes so far. The reactions of acyclic alkanes (e.g., n-pentane and n-hexane) with NHPI were then tested and inseparable oxidation products 8a/8b (1.7/1) and 9a/9b (1/2.4) were obtained, respectively, while single products were delivered from the reaction of 2,2-dimethylbutane and 2,2,4,4-tetramethylpentane in 48% (10) and 88% (11) yields, respectively. In these cases, no activation of the primary C(sp3)–H bond occurred. Further studies revealed that toluene, trimethylbenzene, p-nitrotoluene, p-chlorotoluene, 2-methylfuran, and 2-methylthiophene were suitable substrates as well, and the corresponding oxidation products (1217) were afforded in 56–94% yields. The benzyl C(sp3)–H bond was involved in the CDC reaction for these substrates, and the chloro substituent on the phenyl ring does not affect the desired transformation essentially.

Fig. 3: CDC coupling of various C–H reagents with NHPI.
Fig. 3: CDC coupling of various C–H reagents with NHPI.
Full size image

General procedure: the reactions were carried out with NHPI (1 mmol), alkane (2 mmol), PhI(OAc)2 (2 mmol) in DCM (2 mL) at room temperature for 2 h. Isolated yield. aThe substrate (20 mmol) was used as the solvent.

Cyano compounds play an important role in drug synthesis49, and several research groups have realised direct oxidation of α–C(sp3)–H in alkyl nitrile with metal catalysts50,51. Hence, alkyl nitrile substrates were next studied under the current transition metal-free conditions. For butyronitrile, isobutyronitrile, and pentonitrile, the corresponding α–C(sp3)–H bond oxidation products (1820) were generated in the yields of 45–86%. The CDC reaction of various ethers and sulfides was also investigated. Cyclic ethers (2123), acyclic ethers (2430), thioethers (3134), and even haloether (27) were converted into the corresponding oxidation products smoothly.

Synthetic applications

A gram-scale reaction was performed to demonstrate the application of the current synthetic method. O-(Thiophen-2-ylmethyl) hydroxylamine is a key intermediate for the synthesis of new cephalosporins. The CDC reaction was scaled up to gram-scale with 2-methylthiophene as the substrate and compound 17 was obtained in 77% yield (Fig. 4). Alkoxyamine 35 was then obtained via hydrazinolysis of 17.

Fig. 4: A gram-scale experiment.
Fig. 4: A gram-scale experiment.
Full size image

Gram-scale with 2-methylthiophene and hydrazinolysis.

Relevant mechanistic studies were next performed (Fig. 5). The reaction of toluene (as the substrate) was found to be totally inhibited upon addition of 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinooxy (TEMPO), 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol (BHT), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), or Galvinoxyl. These results indicated that the current transformation might proceed via a radical reaction pathway.

Fig. 5: Effect of radical trapping reagents to the reaction mixture.
Fig. 5: Effect of radical trapping reagents to the reaction mixture.
Full size image

PhI(OAc)2 (0.54 mmol), radical trapping reagent (0.54 mmol) and NHPI (0.27 mmol) were added to a solution of toluene (0.54 mmol) in DCM (2 mL).

A plausible mechanism is proposed for the current reaction (Fig. 6). Oxidation of NHPI (2) with PhI(OAc)2 affords PINO radical35, which reacts with the substrate to form an alkyl radical via hydrogen abstraction. Finally, the alkyl radical couples with PINO radical to deliver the final product.

Fig. 6: Proposed reaction mechanism.
Fig. 6: Proposed reaction mechanism.
Full size image

Oxidation of NHPI with PhI(OAc)2 affords PINO radical.

In conclusion, selective C–H functionalisation of alkanes remains a great challenge. PhI(OAc)2 has been applied to mediating radical coupling of N-hydroxyphthalimide and unactivated C(sp3)–H bonds in a range of cyclic and acyclic alkanes. The present reaction was conducted at room temperature which was compatible with various solvents. A variety of cycloalkanes, acyclic alkanes, cyanides, ethers, and thioethers reacted smoothly with NHPI avoiding volatile, toxic and explosive reagents, providing a direct and simple access to O-substituted NHPI derivatives.

Methods

General Information

All experiments were conducted under air, using commercially purchased analytical reagents and solvents which do not require further purification. 1HNMR and 13CNMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker spectrometer (at 400 and 100 MHz, respectively). TMS was used as reference for chemical shifts. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was recorded on an Agilent Technologies LC-TOF instrument. X-ray crystallography of compounds 4, 11, and 17 were performed on a Bruker Smart Apex CCD area detector diffractometer using graphite-monochromated Mo Kα radiation. The regards to the suitability and safety warnings of PhH: avoid contact with the skin, the eyes; wear suitable protective clothing, gloves, eye/ face protection; avoid release to the environment.

General procedure for the synthesis of R-ONH2 compounds

PhI(OAc)2 (2 mmol) and NHPI (1 mmol) were added to a solution of a substrate (2 mmol) in DCM (2 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure to give a crude product, which was purified by flash silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 50:1 to 20:1) to give the product.

Procedure for compound 35

Water (36 mL) and N-hydrazine hydrate (1.8 g, 54 mmol) were added to a solution of 2-(thiophen-2-ylmethoxy)isoindoline-1,3-dione (1.2 g, 4.63 mmol) in acetonitrile (50 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The crude product was purified by flash silica gel column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc, 5:1) to give the product (0.54 g, 91%) as a brown solid.

Reaction of Toluene with NHPI in the presence of radical trapping reagent

PhI(OAc)2 (0.54 mmol), radical trapping reagent (0.54 mmol), and NHPI (0.27 mmol) were added to a solution of toluene (0.54 mmol) in DCM (2 mL), and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h and detected by TLC.

Methods of the calculation of BDEs

The bond dissociation enthalpies (BDEs) were calculated by Gaussian 16 at B3LYP/6-31 G basis set level.

The BDEs for cyclohexane (cyclohexane-H) was calculated as:

[−234.992855 Hatree (Cyclohexane radical)] + [−0.497912 Hatree (H radical)] − [−235.644013 Hatree (Cyclohexane)] = 0.153246 Hatree = 402.3 kJ mol−1.

The BDEs for cyclohexane (DCM-H) was calculated as:

[−958.957469 Hatree (DCM radical)] + [−0.497912 Hatree (H radical)] − [−959.614026 Hatree (DCM)] = 0.158645 Hatree = 416.5 kJ mol−1.