Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

TRBC2-targeting antibody–drug conjugates for the treatment of T cell cancers

Abstract

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) have been remarkably successful in treating solid and hematological malignancies. Generation of ADCs for T cell cancers is challenging because the ADCs must selectively target cancerous T cells while sparing some normal T cells necessary for immune function. T cells express one of two TRBC alleles: TRBC1 or TRBC2. Normal T cells are composed of about 40% TRBC1-expressing and 60% TRBC2-expressing cells. In contrast, T cell malignancies are characterized by the clonal expression of either TRBC1 or TRBC2. Selective targeting of TRBC1 or TRBC2 enables the killing of cancer cells but preserves about 60–40% of the normal T cells. To enable such a therapy for cancers expressing TRBC2, here we developed a high-affinity anti-TRBC2 antibody. An ADC generated with this antibody and a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer payload showed specific killing of TRBC2+ cancers in vitro and in mouse models. The anti-TRBC2 ADC provides a promising, off-the-shelf therapy for patients with T cell cancers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: TRBC2-specific antibody generation by phage display.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Anti-TRBC2 antibody shows specific binding to TRBC2+ cells.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Anti-TRBC2 antibody is internalized into lysosomes.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Anti-TRBC2 ADC specifically kills TRBC2+ cells.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5: Anti-TRBC2 ADC kills patient-derived cancer cells.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 6: JX1.1 anti-TRBC2 ADC performance in vivo.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The new anti-TRBC2 antibody sequences described in this work are provided in Supplementary Table 3. The remaining data are available within the article, Supplementary Information and from the corresponding author on request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Sung, H. et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel, R. L., Giaquinto, A. N. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J. Clin. 74, 12–49 (2024).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fielding, A. K. et al. Outcome of 609 adults after relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL): an MRC UKALL12/ECOG 2993 study. Blood 109, 944–950 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bellei, M. et al. The outcome of peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients failing first-line therapy: a report from the prospective, International T-Cell Project. Haematologica 103, 1191–1197 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cappell, K. M. & Kochenderfer, J. N. Long-term outcomes following CAR T cell therapy: what we know so far. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 20, 359–371 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Paul, S. et al. Cancer therapy with antibodies. Nat. Rev. Cancer 24, 399–426 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Paul, S. & Zhou, S. Six events that shaped antibody approvals in oncology. Front. Immunol. 16, 1533796 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiesa, R. et al. Base-edited CAR7 T cells for relapsed T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 389, 899–910 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brudno, J. N. et al. Transient responses and significant toxicities of anti-CD30 CAR T cells for CD30+ lymphomas: results of a phase 1 trial. Blood Adv. 8, 802–814 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirsch, I. R. et al. TCR sequencing facilitates diagnosis and identifies mature T cells as the cell of origin in CTCL. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 308ra158 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Asnafi, V. et al. Age-related phenotypic and oncogenic differences in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias may reflect thymic atrophy. Blood 104, 4173–4180 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sims, J. E., Tunnacliffe, A., Smith, W. J. & Rabbitts, T. H. Complexity of human T-cell antigen receptor beta-chain constant- and variable-region genes. Nature 312, 541–545 (1984).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maciocia, P. M. et al. Targeting the T cell receptor beta-chain constant region for immunotherapy of T cell malignancies. Nat. Med. 23, 1416–1423 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Paul, S. et al. TCR beta chain-directed bispecific antibodies for the treatment of T cell cancers. Sci. Transl. Med. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abd3595 (2021).

  15. Nichakawade, T. D. et al. TRBC1-targeting antibody-drug conjugates for the treatment of T cell cancers. Nature 628, 416–423 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cwynarski, K. et al. TRBC1-CAR T cell therapy in peripheral T cell lymphoma: a phase 1/2 trial. Nat. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03326-7 (2024).

  17. Ferrari, M. et al. Structure-guided engineering of immunotherapies targeting TRBC1 and TRBC2 in T cell malignancies. Nat. Commun. 15, 1583 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. TRBC2 Chimeric Recombinant Mouse Monoclonal Antibody (SAM.2). Thermo Fisher https://www.thermofisher.com/antibody/product/TRBC2-Chimeric-Antibody-clone-SAM-2-Recombinant-Monoclonal/704905 (2024).

  19. McCutcheon, M. Beckman Coulter Life Sciences achieves industry-first with commercial release of anti-TRBC2 conjugated antibody for flow cytometry. Beckman Coulter https://www.beckman.com/news/commercial-release-of-anti-trbc2-conjugated-antibody-for-flow-cytometry (2024).

  20. Loew, A., Katragadda, M., Guntas, G., Marek, P. & Palakurthi, S. Methods of detecting TRBC1 or TRBC2. WIPO (PCT) WO2022047046A1 patent (2022).

  21. Horna, P. et al. Dual T-cell constant beta chain (TRBC)1 and TRBC2 staining for the identification of T-cell neoplasms by flow cytometry. Blood Cancer J. 14, 34 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Reff, M. E. et al. Depletion of B cells in vivo by a chimeric mouse human monoclonal antibody to CD20. Blood 83, 435–445 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Law, C. L. et al. Expression and characterization of recombinant soluble human CD3 molecules: presentation of antigenic epitopes defined on the native TCR-CD3 complex. Int. Immunol. 14, 389–400 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pescovitz, M. D. Rituximab, an anti-cd20 monoclonal antibody: history and mechanism of action. Am. J. Transplant. 6, 859–866 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Uchiyama, S. et al. Development of novel humanized anti-CD20 antibodies based on affinity constant and epitope. Cancer Sci. 101, 201–209 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, Z. et al. CCR4-IL2 bispecific immunotoxin is more effective than brentuximab for targeted therapy of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma in a mouse CTCL model. FEBS Open Bio. 13, 1309–1319 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Alderson, R. F. et al. CAT-8015: a second-generation pseudomonas exotoxin A-based immunotherapy targeting CD22-expressing hematologic malignancies. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 832–839 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kreitman, R. J. & Pastan, I. Antibody fusion proteins: anti-CD22 recombinant immunotoxin moxetumomab pasudotox. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 6398–6405 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tai, Y. T. et al. Novel anti-B-cell maturation antigen antibody-drug conjugate (GSK2857916) selectively induces killing of multiple myeloma. Blood 123, 3128–3138 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lu, S. et al. The rapid and highly parallel identification of antibodies with defined biological activities by SLISY. Nat. Commun. 14, 17 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sadekar, S., Figueroa, I. & Tabrizi, M. Antibody drug conjugates: application of quantitative pharmacology in modality design and target selection. AAPS J. 17, 828–836 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Balomenos, D. et al. Incomplete T cell receptor V beta allelic exclusion and dual V beta-expressing cells. J. Immunol. 155, 3308–3312 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Davodeau, F. et al. Dual T cell receptor beta chain expression on human T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med. 181, 1391–1398 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Groh, V. et al. Human lymphocytes bearing T cell receptor gamma/delta are phenotypically diverse and evenly distributed throughout the lymphoid system. J. Exp. Med. 169, 1277–1294 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Viney, J. L., Prosser, H. M., Hewitt, C. R., Lamb, J. R. & Owen, M. J. Generation of monoclonal antibodies against a human T cell receptor beta chain expressed in transgenic mice. Hybridoma 11, 701–713 (1992).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Krangel, M. S. Endocytosis and recycling of the T3-T cell receptor complex. The role of T3 phosphorylation. J. Exp. Med. 165, 1141–1159 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Caimi, P. F. et al. Loncastuximab tesirine in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LOTIS-2): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 22, 790–800 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Francisco, J. A. et al. cAC10-vcMMAE, an anti-CD30-monomethyl auristatin E conjugate with potent and selective antitumor activity. Blood 102, 1458–1465 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Zammarchi, F. et al. ADCT-402, a PBD dimer-containing antibody drug conjugate targeting CD19-expressing malignancies. Blood 131, 1094–1105 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Hristov, A. C., Vonderheid, E. C. & Borowitz, M. J. Simplified flow cytometric assessment in mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 136, 944–953 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pierog, O. et al. The real-world application of T-cell receptor constant beta-1 chain antibody assay in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Br. J. Haematol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.20060 (2025).

  42. Shafagati, N., Paul, S., Rozati, S. & Sterling, C. H. Antibody-based therapies for peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Cancers https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16203489 (2024).

  43. O’Shannessy, D. J., Brigham-Burke, M., Soneson, K. K., Hensley, P. & Brooks, I. Determination of rate and equilibrium binding constants for macromolecular interactions using surface plasmon resonance: use of nonlinear least squares analysis methods. Anal. Biochem. 212, 457–468 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kreitman, R. J. et al. Efficacy of the anti-CD22 recombinant immunotoxin BL22 in chemotherapy-resistant hairy-cell leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 345, 241–247 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Corbett, S. et al. The role of specific ATP-binding cassettetransporters in the acquired resistance to pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer-containing antibody-drug conjugates. Mol. Cancer Ther. 19, 1856–1865 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. A Working Group of the NIH Office of AIDS Research Advisory Council (OARAC). Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in Adults and Adolescents With HIV (NIH, 2024).

  47. Hakki, M. et al. Immune reconstitution to cytomegalovirus after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: impact of host factors, drug therapy, and subclinical reactivation. Blood 102, 3060–3067 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Pastore, D. et al. Recovery of CMV-specific CD8+ T cells and Tregs after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 17, 550–557 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Ren, J. et al. Generation and optimization of off-the-shelf immunotherapeutics targeting TCR-Vbeta2+ T cell malignancy. Nat. Commun. 15, 519 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Petersen, J. et al. T-cell receptor recognition of HLA-DQ2-gliadin complexes associated with celiac disease. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 480–488 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Ting, Y. T. et al. A molecular basis for the T cell response in HLA-DQ2.2 mediated celiac disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 3063–3073 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. May, E. et al. Conserved TCR beta chain usage in reactive arthritis; evidence for selection by a putative HLA-B27-associated autoantigen. Tissue Antigens 60, 299–308 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Penkava, F. et al. Single-cell sequencing reveals clonal expansions of pro-inflammatory synovial CD8 T cells expressing tissue-homing receptors in psoriatic arthritis. Nat. Commun. 11, 4767 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Komech, E. A. et al. TCR repertoire profiling revealed antigen-driven CD8+ T cell clonal groups shared in synovial fluid of patients with spondyloarthritis. Front. Immunol. 13, 973243 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Britanova, O. V. et al. Targeted depletion of TRBV9+ T cells as immunotherapy in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis. Nat. Med. 29, 2731–2736 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Durham, L. E. et al. Linking skin and joint inflammation in psoriatic arthritis through shared CD8+ T cell clones. Arthritis Rheumatol. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.432862025 (2025).

  57. Direskeneli, H. et al. Oligoclonal T cell expansions in patients with Behcet’s disease. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 117, 166–170 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Zou, J. et al. Comprehensive analysis of T-cell receptor repertoires reveals antigen-driven T-cell clusters in patients with Behcet’s syndrome. Eur. J. Immunol. 53, e2250181 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Xiong, H. et al. Analysis of CD8+ TCRbeta chain repertoire in peripheral blood of vitiligo via high-throughput sequencing. Mol. Immunol. 160, 112–120 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Alachkar, H. & Nakamura, Y. Deep-sequencing of the T-cell receptor repertoire in patients with haplo-cord and matched-donor transplants. Chimerism 6, 47–49 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Swindells, M. B. et al. abYsis: integrated antibody sequence and structure—management, analysis, and prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 429, 356–364 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Kinde, I., Wu, J., Papadopoulos, N., Kinzler, K. W. & Vogelstein, B. Detection and quantification of rare mutations with massively parallel sequencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9530–9535 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Paul, S. et al. T cell receptor signals to NF-kappaB are transmitted by a cytosolic p62-Bcl10-Malt1-IKK signalosome. Sci. Signal. 7, ra45 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Paul, S., Kashyap, A. K., Jia, W., He, Y. W. & Schaefer, B. C. Selective autophagy of the adaptor protein Bcl10 modulates T cell receptor activation of NF-kappaB. Immunity 36, 947–958 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Paul, S. & Schaefer, B. C. Visualizing TCR-induced POLKADOTS formation and NF-kappaB activation in the D10 T-cell clone and mouse primary effector T cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 1280, 219–238 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Traver, M. K., Paul, S. & Schaefer, B. C. T cell receptor activation of NF-kappaB in effector T cells: visualizing signaling events within and beyond the cytoplasmic domain of the immunological synapse. Methods Mol. Biol. 1584, 101–127 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Dbouk (Johns Hopkins), A. Tam (Johns Hopkins), K. Judge (Johns Hopkins), P. Tiwari (Georgetown University) and A. Uren (Georgetown University) for their scientific and technical support. We thank the patients for contributing samples to the biorepository at Johns Hopkins and the Biacore Molecular Interaction Shared Resource (BMISR) facility at Georgetown University. This work was supported by grants from the Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research, Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Commonwealth Fund, Bloomberg–Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Bloomberg Philanthropies and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Cancer Center Support Grant (no. P30 CA006973). S.P. was supported by the National Cancer Institute (NCI, grant no. K08CA270403), Blood Cancer United, formerly the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Translation Research Program award, the American Society of Hematology Scholar award and the Swim Across America Translational Cancer Research award. B.J.M., S.R.D. and A.H.P. were supported by the NIH (grant no. T32 GM136577). T.D.N. was supported by the NCI (grant no. T32 CA153952). M.F.K. was supported by an NIH and/or National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases grant (no. 1R21AI176764-01), the Jerome Greene Foundation and the Cupid Foundation. C.B. was supported by the NCI (grant no. R37 CA230400). C.B. and N.P. were supported by NCI (grant no. U01CA230691). N.M. was supported by the NIGMS (grant no. T32 GM148383). The BMISR is supported by the NIH (grant no. P30CA51008). X.L. was supported by the NIH and National Institute of General Medical Sciences (grant no. T32GM007057-47). C.G.M. was supported by a P30 Cancer Center Support Grant that facilitates the infrastructure (grant nos. CA021765 and R35 CA197695) and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. The illustrations were generated using BioRender, ChemDraw and Adobe Illustrator.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.P., J.G., K.W.K., B.V. and S.Z. conceived the study. S.P., J.G., B.S.L., T.A., S.L., S.R.D., X.L., J.D., M.P., T.D.N., S.S., B.J.M., K.W.K. and B.V. developed the methods. J.G., J.U., X.L. and M.P. performed the phage display. J.G., T.A. and B.S.L. generated ADCs and conducted in vitro assays. J.G., E.W., S.P. and K.G. conducted in vivo studies. J.G., T.D.N., B.J.M., S.R.D., N.W., N.M., S.G., J.L., M.F.K., C.S., N.W.J., S.R., D.M.P., N.P., C.B., K.W.K., S.Z., S.S., B.V. and S.P. assisted with the analysis and interpretation of data. S.R., J.D.P., R.F.A., C.S. and N.W.J. provided patient samples. C.G.M. provided PDX samples. S.P., J.G. and B.V. wrote the original draft. All authors reviewed and edited the final manuscript. S.P., K.W.K. and B.V. supervised the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suman Paul.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The Johns Hopkins University has filed patent applications related to technologies described in this paper, including patent WO 2025/007013, on which S.P., T.D.N., J.G., B.V., K.W.K., N.P. and S.Z. are listed as inventors. S.P. is a consultant to Merck, owns equity in Gilead and received payments from IQVIA and Curio Science. S.P., M.F.K., B.V., K.W.K. and S.Z. are founders and hold equity in TBD Pharma. C.B. and N.P. hold equity in TBD Pharma. B.V., K.W.K. and N.P. are founders of Thrive Earlier Detection, an Exact Sciences Company and hold equity in Haystack Oncology and CAGE Pharma. K.W.K. and N.P. are consultants to Exact Sciences. B.V., K.W.K., N.P. and S.Z. hold equity in Exact Sciences, and are founders of or consultants to and own equity in CLASP. N.P., B.V. and K.W.K. hold equity in NeoPhore; B.V. and K.W.K. are consultants to NeoPhore. M.F.K. received personal fees from Argenx, Revel Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi and Doximity, all unrelated to this work. M.F.K. is a consultant to Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Allogene, Amgen, Argenx, Atara Biotherapeutics, Bristol Myers Squibb, Legend Biotech, Mucommune, Revel Pharmaceuticals, Sana Biotechnology and Sanofi. M.F.K. received research support from Blackbird Labs, NorthStar Medical Radioisotope and TBD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. B.V. is a consultant for and holds equity in Catalio Capital Management. S.Z. has a research agreement with BioMed Valley Discoveries, Inc. C.B. is a consultant to Depuy-Synthes, Bionaut Labs, Haystack Oncology and Privo Technologies and is a co-founder of OrisDx and Belay Diagnostics. C.H.S. is a consultant to Kyowa Kirin, and has served on advisory boards for Acrotech Biopharma and received honoraria from Medical Logix and Haymarket Medical Education. D.M.P. reports grant and patent royalties through institutions from BMS, a grant from Compugen, stock from Trieza Therapeutics and Dracen Pharmaceuticals and founder equity from Potenza; is a consultant for Aduro Biotech, Amgen, AstraZeneca (Medimmune/Amplimmune), Bayer, DNAtrix, Dynavax Technologies Corporation, Ervaxx, FLX Bio, Rock Springs Capital, Janssen, Merck, Tizona and ImmunomicTherapeutics; and is on the scientific advisory board of Five Prime Therapeutics, Camden Nexus II and WindMil and on the board of directors for Dracen Pharmaceuticals. C.G.M. serves on the advisory board of Illumina, reports speaking fees from Amgen and has received funding from Pfizer and royalties from Cyrus. J.D. is a consultant to Clasp Therapeutics and Hemogenyx. The companies named above, as well as other companies, have licensed previously described technologies related to the work described in this paper from Johns Hopkins University. S.P., T.D.N., J.G., B.V., K.W.K., N.P. and S.Z. are inventors of some of these technologies. Licenses to these technologies are or will be associated with equity or royalty payments to the inventors as well as to Johns Hopkins University. Patent applications on the work described in this paper may be filed by Johns Hopkins University. The terms of all these arrangements are being managed by Johns Hopkins University following its conflict-of-interest policies. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Cancer thanks John DiPersio, Kirstin Zettlitz and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Anti-TRBC2 antibody production.

a, SDS PAGE and Coomassie Blue stain of the indicated anti-TRBC2 antibodies under reducing and non-reducing conditions. Number of independent repeats = 1 b, Size exclusion chromatography (SEC) of the SEC standards and the indicated anti-TRBC2 antibodies. Data from one experiment.

Extended Data Fig. 2 SPR measurements and explanation of SLISY ratios.

a, Antibody binding to TRBC1 and TRBC2 proteins was measured with multiple-cycle kinetics by SPR. Antibodies were captured on CM5 chips, followed by injection of TRBC2 or TRBC1 proteins at the indicated concentrations. The affinities of each antibody to TRBC1 and TRBC2 proteins are indicated on the graph. NB = no binding. Data representative of one experiment. b, Example of calculation of binding ratio and enrichment ratio of the phage display illustrated in Fig. 1b.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Anti-TRBC2 antibody binding and internalization.

a, PBMCs isolated from three different normal human donors and stained with the JX1.1 anti-TRBC2 antibody (with C-terminus 6x histidine tag) followed by secondary staining with an anti-histidine DyLight 650 antibody. PBMCs were also stained with the indicated antibodies to identify B cells, NK cells and monocytes. Numbers beside plots indicate the percentage of cells in a representative experiment. b, Quantification of red fluorescence over time after the addition of the indicated pHrodo-tagged anti-TRBC2 antibodies. Data represent mean ± standard error of the mean. p-values obtained by one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test. Data representative of one experiment.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Synthesis and characterization of anti-TRBC2 ADCs.

a, Schematic of the anti-TRBC2 antibody conjugation to SG3249. b, Hydrophobic interaction chromatography of the indicated anti-TRBC2 antibodies and the anti-TRBC2-SG3249 ADCs. c, The calculated drug antibody ratio (DAR) for the indicated anti-TRBC1-SG3249 ADCs. Data representative of one (SAM.2, YR3-A5, KFN) or two (JX1.1) independent experiments. d, e, Flow cytometry histogram depicting binding of JX1.1 antibody and JX1.1 ADC (1 µg/mL) to the three TRBC2-expressing T-cell lines (b) with aggregate median fluorescent intensity from three experiments plotted in (e). Data represent mean ± standard error of the mean. The JX1.1 antibody and JX1.1 ADC harbors a C-terminal 6x histidine tag, and were detected using secondary staining with an anti-his Alexa Fluor 647 antibody. Only the anti-his Alexa Flour 647 antibody was used in the no primary antibody condition.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 5 JX1.1 anti-TRBC2 ADC efficacy.

a, b, normal T cells were activated with CD3/CD28 Dynabeads at a bead:cell ratio of 1:1 for 3 days. Following bead removal, the ‘bead-activated’ normal T cells were incubated with IgG2a control ADC (as negative control) or JX1.1 ADC at the indicated concentrations. After 5 days, flow cytometry was used to detect TRBC2+ and TRBC1+ cells. Numbers beside plots indicate the percentage of surviving cells (a), with data from three human T cell donors shown in (b). Bar graphs represent mean ± standard error of mean. p-values obtained by one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test. c, Timeline of in vivo experiment using NSG mice injected with Jurkat TRBC2+ cells that express luciferase and GFP. On day 3, mice were intravenously injected with YR3-A5 ADC (5 mice) or JX1.1 ADC (5 mice). d, e, BLI was performed on the indicated days with individual mouse data shown in blue (mean value in dark blue) for YR3-A5 ADC, or pink (mean value in red) for JX1.1 ADC (e). Panel c was created using BioRender.com.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 6 JX1.1 anti-TRBC2 ADC kills patient-derived xenografts.

a, T cell cancer PDX samples were stained with control antibodies linked with BV711 or AL647 fluorophores or with anti-CD3-BV711 and JX1.1-AL647 antibodies. b, Timeline of in vivo experiment using NSG mice injected with PDX cells (8 mice for each PDX). On day 7, mice were intravenously injected with ADCs (control in 4 mice, JX1.1-ADC in 4 mice). c, d, Flow cytometry on day 7 and day 13 to assess circulating PDX cells, and aggregate data from 4 mice are shown in (d). In (d) p-value obtained by one-tailed t-test with Welch’s correction. e, f, Body weight and Kaplan-Meier survival of PDX bearing mice with 4 mice in each group. PDX SJTALL056671, median survival 20.5 days in control condition vs. median survival undefined (not reached) in JX1.1 ADC condition. p = 0.0084 by Log-rank Mantel-Cox test. PDX SJTALL055668, median survival 35.5 days in control condition vs. median survival undefined (not reached) in JX1.1 ADC condition. p = 0.0067 by Log-rank Mantel-Cox test. In (e, f) individual mouse data are shown in gray (mean value in black) for control, or pink (mean value in red) for JX1.1 ADC. Panel b was created using BioRender.com.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 7 SPR analysis of anti-TRBC2 antibodies.

SPR analysis of anti-TRBC2 antibodies binding to the indicated TRBC peptides, with overlaid fitted data shown in black. Data representative of one (KFNM, 28K30K32R, 30K32R113R, 30K32R56G) or two (YR3-A5) or three (KFN, SAM.2, JX1.1) independent experiments.

Supplementary information

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Excel file containing source data used to generate Figs. 1–6 and Extended Data Figs. 3–6.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ge, J., Urban, J., DiNapoli, S.R. et al. TRBC2-targeting antibody–drug conjugates for the treatment of T cell cancers. Nat Cancer 6, 2011–2024 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-025-01069-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-025-01069-z

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer