Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
Carriers of LRRK2 pathogenic variants show a milder, anatomically distinct brain signature of Parkinson’s disease
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 03 January 2026

Carriers of LRRK2 pathogenic variants show a milder, anatomically distinct brain signature of Parkinson’s disease

  • Jakub Kopal  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1201-28721,2,
  • Andrew Vo3,
  • Qin Tao3,
  • Tanya Simuni4,
  • Lana M. Chahine5,
  • Danilo Bzdok  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3466-66202,3,6 na1 &
  • …
  • Alain Dagher  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0945-57793,7 na1 

Communications Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1335 Accesses

  • 12 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Parkinson's disease
  • Rare variants

Abstract

Background

Pathogenic LRRK2 gene variants are a major genetic risk factor for both familial and sporadic Parkinson’s dissease (PD), opening an unattended window into disease mechanisms and potential therapies. Investigating the influence of pathogenic variants in LRRK2 gene on brain structure is a crucial step toward enabling early diagnosis and personalized treatment. Yet, despite its significance, the ways in which LRRK2 genotype affects brain structure remain largely unexplored. Work in this domain is plagued by small sample sizes and differences in cohort composition, which can obscure genuine distinctions among clinical subgroups.

Methods

In this study, we overcome such important limitations by combining explicit modeling of population background variation and pattern matching. Specifically, we leverage a cohort of 603 participants (including 370 with a PD diagnosis) to examine MRI-detectable cortical atrophy patterns associated with the LRRK2 pathogenic variants in people with PD and carriers without Parkinson’s symptoms.

Results

LRRK2 PD patients exhibit milder cortical thinning compared to sporadic PD, with notable preservation in temporal and occipital regions, suggesting a distinct pattern of neurodegeneration. Non-manifesting LRRK2 carriers show no significant cortical atrophy, indicating no structural signs of subclinical PD. We further analyze the relationship between aggregated alpha-synuclein in cerebrospinal fluid and atrophy. We find that those with evidence of aggregated alpha-synuclein experienced pronounced neurodegeneration and increased cortical thinning, possibly defining another aggressive PD subtype.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight genetic avenues for distinguishing PD subtypes, which could lead to more targeted treatment approaches and a more complete understanding of Parkinson’s disease progression.

Plain language summary

Parkinson’s disease is a brain disorder that affects movement, thinking, and daily functioning. While most cases have no clear cause, some people carry rare changes in a gene called LRRK2. Another important factor is a brain protein called alpha-synuclein, which can build up in harmful ways. In this study, we used brain scans from a large international project to understand how these genetic and protein markers relate to brain changes. We found that people with LRRK2 mutations had less brain damage than those with typical Parkinson’s disease, even when they had similar symptoms. This suggests that some people may have natural protection in the brain. Our findings could help doctors better understand different forms of Parkinson’s and guide more personalized treatments in the future.

Similar content being viewed by others

Pathophysiological evaluation of the LRRK2 G2385R risk variant for Parkinson’s disease

Article Open access 05 August 2022

LRRK2 p.G2385R and p.R1628P variants in a multi-ethnic Asian Parkinson’s Cohort: epidemiology and clinical insights

Article Open access 18 November 2025

Clinical and functional evidence for the pathogenicity of the LRRK2 p.Arg1067Gln variant

Article Open access 23 February 2025

Data availability

Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained in May 2023 from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database (www.ppmi-info.org/access-data-specimens/download-data), RRID:SCR_006431. Researchers can request access to PPMI imaging, genetic, and clinical data by submitting a data use agreement at the PPMI website. For up-to-date information on the study, visit www.ppmi-info.org. All numerical data underlying the graphs and charts in the main figures are provided as individual Excel files in the Supplementary Data: source data for Figs. 1–5 are available in Supplementary Data 1–5, respectively. Code used for analysis is available as described in the Code Availability section.

Code availability

The processing scripts and custom analysis software used in this work are available in a publicly accessible GitHub repository, along with examples of key visualizations in the paper: https://github.com/jakubkopal/LRRK2-MRI.

References

  1. Taymans, J.-M. et al. Perspective on the current state of the LRRK2 field. npj Park. Dis. 9, 104 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tolosa, E., Vila, M., Klein, C. & Rascol, O. LRRK2 in Parkinson disease: challenges of clinical trials. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 16, 97–107 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sosero, Y. L. & Gan-Or, Z. LRRK2 and Parkinson’s disease: from genetics to targeted therapy. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 10, 850 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simpson, C. et al. Prevalence of ten LRRK2 variants in Parkinson’s disease: a comprehensive review. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 98, 103–113 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Di Maio, R. et al. LRRK2 activation in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 10, eaar5429 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kluss, J. H., Mamais, A. & Cookson, M. R. LRRK2 links genetic and sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 47, 651–661 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jennings, D. et al. Preclinical and clinical evaluation of the LRRK2 inhibitor DNL201 for Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Transl. Med. 14, eabj2658 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Trinh, J., Guella, I. & Farrer, M. J. Disease penetrance of late-onset Parkinsonism: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 71, 1535–1539 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Droby, A., Thaler, A. & Mirelman, A. Imaging markers in genetic forms of Parkinson’s disease. Brain Sci. 13, 1212 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saunders-Pullman, R. et al. Progression in the LRRK2-asssociated Parkinson disease population. JAMA Neurol. 75, 312–319 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kalia, L. V. et al. Clinical correlations with lewy body pathology in LRRK2-related Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol 72, 100–105 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Siderowf, A. et al. Assessment of heterogeneity among participants in the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative cohort using α-synuclein seed amplification: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol. 22, 407–417 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bentivenga, G. M. et al. Performance of a seed amplification assay for misfolded alpha-synuclein in cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissue in relation to Lewy body disease stage and pathology burden. Acta Neuropathol. 147, 18 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hall, S. et al. Performance of αSynuclein RT-QuIC in relation to neuropathological staging of Lewy body disease. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 10, 90 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Garrido, A. et al. Brain and cerebrospinal fluid α-synuclein real-time quaking-induced conversion identifies lewy body pathology in LRRK2-PD. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 38, 333–338 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chahine, L. M. et al. LRRK2-associated parkinsonism with and without in vivo evidence of alpha-synuclein aggregates. MedRxiv Prepr. Serv. Health Sci. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.22.24310806 (2024).

  17. Marek, K. et al. The Parkinson’s progression markers initiative (PPMI) - establishing a PD biomarker cohort. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 5, 1460–1477 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Iwaki, H. et al. Accelerating medicines partnership: Parkinson’s disease. genetic resource. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 36, 1795–1804 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dulski, J., Uitti, R. J., Ross, O. A. & Wszolek, Z. K. Genetic architecture of Parkinson’s disease subtypes – Review of the literature. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14, 1023574 (2022).

  20. Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. NeuroImage 62, 774–781 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Desikan, R. S. et al. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage 31, 968–980 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frazier, J. A. et al. Structural brain magnetic resonance imaging of limbic and thalamic volumes in pediatric bipolar disorder. Am. J. Psychiatry 162, 1256–1265 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Laansma, M. A. et al. International multicenter analysis of brain structure across clinical stages of Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 36, 2583–2594 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Concha-Marambio, L., Pritzkow, S., Shahnawaz, M., Farris, C. M. & Soto, C. Seed amplification assay for the detection of pathologic alpha-synuclein aggregates in cerebrospinal fluid. Nat. Protoc. 18, 1179–1196 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bzdok, D., Wolf, G. & Kopal, J. Harnessing population diversity: in search of tools of the trade. GigaScience 13, giae068 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kopal, J., Uddin, L. Q. & Bzdok, D. The end game: respecting major sources of population diversity. Nat. Methods 20, 1122–1128 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Benkarim, O. et al. Population heterogeneity in clinical cohorts affects the predictive accuracy of brain imaging. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001627 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kuhn, H. W. The Hungarian method for the assignment problem. Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 2, 83–97 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goetz, C. G. et al. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 23, 2129–2170 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nasreddine, Z. S. et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 53, 695–699 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nalls, M. A. et al. Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson’s disease. Nat. Genet. 46, 989–993 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brooker, S. M., Naylor, G. E. & Krainc, D. Cell biology of Parkinson’s disease: Mechanisms of synaptic, lysosomal, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 85, 102841 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Martínez, M. et al. Brainstem neuromelanin and iron MRI reveals a precise signature for idiopathic and LRRK2 Parkinson’s disease. npj Park. Dis. 9, 1–11 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Obeso, J. A. et al. Pathophysiology of the basal ganglia in Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci. 23, S8–S19 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ohtsuka, C. et al. Changes in substantia nigra and locus coeruleus in patients with early-stage Parkinson’s disease using neuromelanin-sensitive MR imaging. Neurosci. Lett. 541, 93–98 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Batzu, L. et al. Increased basal forebrain volumes could prevent cognitive decline in LRRK2 Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 183, 106182 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, S.-Y. et al. The effect of LRRK2 mutations on the cholinergic system in manifest and premanifest stages of Parkinson’s disease: a cross-sectional PET study. Lancet Neurol. 17, 309–316 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schumacher, J., Ray, N., Teipel, S. & Storch, A. Associations of cholinergic system integrity with cognitive decline in GBA1 and LRRK2 mutation carriers. NPJ Park. Dis. 10, 127 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Thullbery, M. D., Cox, H. D., Schule, T., Thompson, C. M. & George, K. M. Differential localization of acetylcholinesterase in neuronal and non-neuronal cells. J. Cell. Biochem. 96, 599–610 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bohnen, N. I. et al. Cholinergic system changes in Parkinson’s disease: emerging therapeutic approaches. Lancet Neurol. 21, 381–392 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mesulam, M. M., Mufson, E. J., Levey, A. I. & Wainer, B. H. Cholinergic innervation of cortex by the basal forebrain: cytochemistry and cortical connections of the septal area, diagonal band nuclei, nucleus basalis (substantia innominata), and hypothalamus in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 214, 170–197 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Srivatsal, S. et al. Cognitive profile of LRRK2-related Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. Soc. 30, 728–733 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mak, E. et al. Baseline and longitudinal grey matter changes in newly diagnosed Parkinson’s disease: ICICLE-PD study. Brain 138, 2974–2986 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gao, Y. et al. Changes of brain structure in Parkinson’s disease patients with mild cognitive impairment analyzed via VBM technology. Neurosci. Lett. 658, 121–132 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ballinger, E., Ananth, M., Talmage, D. A. & Role, L. Basal forebrain cholinergic circuits and signaling in cognition and cognitive decline. Neuron 91, 1199–1218 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Rahayel, S. et al. A prodromal brain-clinical pattern of cognition in synucleinopathies. Ann. Neurol. 89, 341–357 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Brockmann, K. et al. Clinical and brain imaging characteristics in leucine-rich repeat kinase 2-associated PD and asymptomatic mutation carriers. Mov. Disord. Off. J. Mov. Disord. Soc. 26, 2335–2342 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Reetz, K. et al. Structural imaging in the presymptomatic stage of genetically determined parkinsonism. Neurobiol. Dis. 39, 402–408 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Droby, A. et al. Radiological markers of CSF α-synuclein aggregation in Parkinson’s disease patients. npj Park. Dis. 11, 1–9 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Liu, W. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid α-synuclein adds the risk of cognitive decline and is associated with tau pathology among non-demented older adults. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 16, 103 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wong, Y. C. & Krainc, D. α-synuclein toxicity in neurodegeneration: mechanism and therapeutic strategies. Nat. Med. 23, 1–13 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bieri, G. et al. LRRK2 modifies α-syn pathology and spread in mouse models and human neurons. Acta Neuropathol.137, 961–980 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Dues, D. J. & Moore, D. J. LRRK2 and protein aggregation in parkinson’s disease: insights from animal models. Front. Neurosci. 14, 719 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Walker, L. & Attems, J. Prevalence of concomitant pathologies in Parkinson’s disease: implications for prognosis, diagnosis, and insights into common pathogenic mechanisms. J. Park. Dis. 14, 35–52 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mahlknecht, P. et al. Significance of MRI in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Neurodegener. Dis. 7, 300–318 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Peplow, P., Martinez, B. & Gennarelli, T. A. Neurodegenerative Diseases Biomarkers: Towards Translating Research to Clinical Practice (Humana, 2021).

  57. Heim, B., Krismer, F., De Marzi, R. & Seppi, K. Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neural Transm. 124, 915–964 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Haaxma, C. A. et al. Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 78, 819 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Rosenbaum, P. R. & Rubin, D. B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70, 41–55 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

PPMI—a public-private partnership—is funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research and funding partners, including 4D Pharma, Abbvie, AcureX, Allergan, Amathus Therapeutics, Aligning Science Across Parkinson’s, AskBio, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, BIAL, BioArctic, Biogen, Biohaven, BioLegend, BlueRock Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Calico Labs, Capsida Biotherapeutics, Celgene, Cerevel Therapeutics, Coave Therapeutics, DaCapo Brainscience, Denali, Edmond J. Safra Foundation, Eli Lilly, Gain Therapeutics, GE HealthCare, Genentech, GSK, Golub Capital, Handl Therapeutics, Insitro, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Lundbeck, Merck, Meso Scale Discovery, Mission Therapeutics, Neurocrine Biosciences, Neuron23, Neuropore, Pfizer, Piramal, Prevail Therapeutics, Roche, Sanofi, Servier, Sun Pharma Advanced Research Company, Takeda, Teva, UCB, Vanqua Bio, Verily, Voyager. D.B. was supported by the Brain Canada Foundation, through the Canada Brain Research Fund, with the financial support of Health Canada, National Institutes of Health (NIH R01 AG068563A, NIH R01 DA053301-01A1, NIH R01 MH129858-01A1), the Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR 438531, CIHR 470425), the Healthy Brains Healthy Lives initiative (Canada First Research Excellence fund), the IVADO R3AI initiative (Canada First Research Excellence fund), and by the CIFAR Artificial Intelligence Chairs program (Canada Institute for Advanced Research). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Danilo Bzdok, Alain Dagher.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Precision Psychiatry, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Jakub Kopal

  2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Jakub Kopal & Danilo Bzdok

  3. The Neuro - Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

    Andrew Vo, Qin Tao, Danilo Bzdok & Alain Dagher

  4. Department of Neurology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

    Tanya Simuni

  5. Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

    Lana M. Chahine

  6. Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Danilo Bzdok

  7. Department of Neurology and neurosurgery, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada

    Alain Dagher

Authors
  1. Jakub Kopal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew Vo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Qin Tao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tanya Simuni
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lana M. Chahine
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Danilo Bzdok
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alain Dagher
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.K. performed the analyses and drafted the manuscript. A.D. conceived the project and provided neurological expertise. D.B. led the analytical pipeline design and supervised the methodological framework. AV curated the dataset. Q.T. assisted with data preparation and quality control. S.T. and L.M.C. contributed to interpretation of the results in clinical context. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danilo Bzdok.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

D.B. is a shareholder and advisory board member at MindState Design Labs, USA. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5

Transparent Peer Review file

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kopal, J., Vo, A., Tao, Q. et al. Carriers of LRRK2 pathogenic variants show a milder, anatomically distinct brain signature of Parkinson’s disease. Commun Med (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-01330-7

Download citation

  • Received: 13 October 2025

  • Accepted: 12 December 2025

  • Published: 03 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-01330-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Advances in neurodegenerative diseases

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact
  • Conferences
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Posters
  • Editorial policies

Publish with us

  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Medicine (Commun Med)

ISSN 2730-664X (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing