Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
Association of chronic disease risk and physical activity measured by wearable devices in the All of Us program
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 January 2026

Association of chronic disease risk and physical activity measured by wearable devices in the All of Us program

  • Yu Hou  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0009-7184-65921,2,
  • Erjia Cui3,
  • Kelvin Lim  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2390-72684,
  • Lisa S. Chow  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6210-23075,
  • Michael Howell6,
  • Sayeed Ikramuddin2 &
  • …
  • Rui Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8258-35851,2,7 

Communications Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1164 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Lifestyle modification

Abstract

Background

Physical activity plays an important role in preventing chronic diseases, but most studies rely on self-reported or short-term data that fail to capture habitual behavior. This study utilizes Fitbit data to investigate the relationship between physical activity and various chronic diseases.

Methods

We analyzed data from 22,019 participants in the All of Us Research Program who shared at least six months of Fitbit activity data linked with electronic health records. Various physical activity patterns were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards and logistic regression models, adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). To test robustness, sensitivity analyses were conducted using obesity defined by BMI, applying a two-year exclusion window for outcome diagnoses to mitigate potential reverse causation, and incorporating lifestyle covariates (smoking and alcohol use) under a simplified directed acyclic graph (DAG) framework to address residual confounding.

Results

Here, we show that higher physical activity levels are associated with lower risks of multiple chronic conditions. Higher daily step counts were negatively associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes, while greater elevation gains and longer vigorous activity are associated with lower risks of conditions such as morbid obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, and major depressive disorder. All sensitivity analyses yield consistent results, supporting the robustness of findings against reverse causation and lifestyle confounding.

Conclusions

Higher physical activity and lower sedentary time may help prevent diverse chronic diseases. These findings demonstrate the potential of large-scale wearable data to inform personalized prevention and population health strategies.

Plain language summary

This study looked at how physical activity affects the risk of developing long-term health problems. Researchers used data from people who wore Fitbit devices to track their daily activity, including step count, exercise intensity, and how long they were active or sitting. These data were linked with each person’s medical records to understand how activity levels related to chronic diseases such as obesity, diabetes, and depression. The study found that people who were more active—taking more steps, climbing more elevation, and spending more time in intense activity—had a lower chance of developing these diseases. The results suggest that being more active and sitting less can help people stay healthier and may support future public health advice and personal health planning.

Similar content being viewed by others

Association of step counts over time with the risk of chronic disease in the All of Us Research Program

Article Open access 10 October 2022

Data from the All of Us research program reinforces existence of activity inequality

Article Open access 04 January 2025

Timing of objectively-collected physical activity in relation to body weight and metabolic health in sedentary older people: a cross-sectional and prospective analysis

Article 15 November 2021

Data availability

This study used data from the All of Us Research Program’s Control Tier Dataset v8, available to authorized users on the Researcher Workbench, which can be accessed via https://workbench.researchallofus.org/. The source data for the main figures are provided as Supplementary Data files. Specifically, the source data for Figs. 1, 2 are provided in Supplementary Data 1. Source data for Supplementary Figs. 3–10 are identical to the Cox proportional hazards model results reported in Table 2 and are therefore not provided separately.

Code availability

Code used for this study is available to approved researchers upon request. Researchers can access the code on the All of Us Research Workbench platform by contacting our study team.

References

  1. Noncommunicable diseases https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases.

  2. Flegal, K. M., Kit, B. K., Orpana, H. & Graubard, B. I. Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 309, 71–82 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Malhi, G. S. & Mann, J. J. Depression. Lancet 392, 2299–2312 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Warburton, D. E. R., Nicol, C. W. & Bredin, S. S. D. Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. CMAJ 174, 801–809 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, I.-M. et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet 380, 219–229 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haskell, W. L., Blair, S. N. & Hill, J. O. Physical activity: health outcomes and importance for public health policy. Prev. Med. 49, 280–282 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao, A., Cui, E., Leroux, A., Lindquist, M. A. & Crainiceanu, C. M. Evaluating the prediction performance of objective physical activity measures for incident Parkinson’s disease in the UK Biobank. J. Neurol. 270, 5913–5923 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meng, Q. et al. Quantifying the association between objectively measured physical activity and multiple sclerosis in the UK Biobank. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 55, 2194–2202 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Prince, S. A. et al. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 5, 56 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schrack, J. A. et al. Assessing the “physical cliff”: detailed quantification of age-related differences in daily patterns of physical activity. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 69, 973–979 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Adam Noah, J., Spierer, D. K., Gu, J. & Bronner, S. Comparison of steps and energy expenditure assessment in adults of Fitbit tracker and ultra to the Actical and indirect calorimetry. J. Med. Eng. Technol. 37, 456–462 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Evenson, K. R., Goto, M. M. & Furberg, R. D. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 12, 159 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. All of Us Research Program Investigators et al. The “All of Us” Research Program. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 668–676 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mayo, K. R. et al. The All of Us data and research center: creating a secure, scalable, and sustainable ecosystem for biomedical research. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 6, 443–464 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Curated Data Repository (CDR) version 8 Release Notes. User Support https://support.researchallofus.org/hc/en-us/articles/30294451486356-Curated-Data-Repository-CDR-version-8-Release-Notes.

  16. Master, H. et al. How Fitbit data are being made available to registered researchers in All of Us Research Program. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 28, 19–30 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Resources for Using Fitbit Data. All of Us https://support.researchallofus.org/hc/en-us/articles/20281023493908-Resources-for-Using-Fitbit-Data.

  18. Troiano, R. P. et al. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 40, 181–188 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zheng, N. S. et al. Sleep patterns and risk of chronic disease as measured by long-term monitoring with commercial wearable devices in the All of Us Research Program. Nat. Med. 30, 2648–2656 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leroux, A. et al. NHANES 2011-2014: objective physical activity is the strongest predictor of all-cause mortality. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 56, 1926–1934 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leroux, A. et al. Quantifying the predictive performance of objectively measured physical activity on mortality in the UK Biobank. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 76, 1486–1494 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Denny, J. C. et al. Systematic comparison of phenome-wide association study of electronic medical record data and genome-wide association study data. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1102–1110 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wei, W.-Q. et al. Evaluating phecodes, clinical classification software, and ICD-9-CM codes for phenome-wide association studies in the electronic health record. PLoS ONE 12, e0175508 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, P. et al. Mapping ICD-10 and ICD-10-CM codes to phecodes: workflow development and initial evaluation. JMIR Med. Inform. 7, e14325 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Perry, A. S. et al. Association of longitudinal activity measures and diabetes risk: an analysis from the National Institutes of Health All of Us Research Program. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 108, 1101–1109 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Althoff, T. et al. Large-scale physical activity data reveal worldwide activity inequality. Nature 547, 336–339 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schuch, F. et al. Physical activity and sedentary behavior in people with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 210, 139–150 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vancampfort, D. et al. Sedentary behavior and physical activity levels in people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry 16, 308–315 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mendelson, M. et al. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, objectively measured physical activity and exercise training interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Neurol. 9, 73 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hall, K. A., Singh, M., Mukherjee, S. & Palmer, L. J. Physical activity is associated with reduced prevalence of self-reported obstructive sleep apnea in a large, general population cohort study. J. Clin. Sleep Med. 16, 1179–1187 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Paffenbarger, R. S. Jr, Jung, D. L., Leung, R. W. & Hyde, R. T. Physical activity and hypertension: an epidemiological view. Ann. Med. 23, 319–327 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Diaz, K. M. & Shimbo, D. Physical activity and the prevention of hypertension. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 15, 659–668 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Team, T. P. D. Pandas-Dev/Pandas: Pandas. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3509134 (2020).

  34. Harris et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Seabold, S. & Perktold, J. Statsmodels: econometric and statistical modeling with Python. In Proc. 9th Python in Science Conference (SciPy, 2010).

  36. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Davidson-Pilon, C. Lifelines: survival analysis in Python. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1317 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Master, H. et al. Association of step counts over time with the risk of chronic disease in the All of Us Research Program. Nat. Med. 28, 2301–2308 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schuch, F. B. et al. Physical activity and incident depression: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Am. J. Psychiatry 175, 631–648 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Arem, H. et al. Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship. JAMA Intern. Med. 175, 959–967 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Del Pozo Cruz, B., Ahmadi, M. N., Lee, I.-M. & Stamatakis, E. Prospective associations of daily step counts and intensity with cancer and cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality and all-cause mortality. JAMA Intern. Med. 182, 1139–1148 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Reiner, M., Niermann, C., Jekauc, D. & Woll, A. Long-term health benefits of physical activity-a systematic review of longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health 13, 813 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lee, I.-M. et al. Association of step volume and intensity with all-cause mortality in older women. JAMA Intern. Med. 179, 1105–1112 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ekelund, U. et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ 366, l4570 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Piercy, K. L. et al. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA 320, 2020–2028 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bennell, K., Matheson, G., Meeuwisse, W. & Brukner, P. Risk factors for stress fractures. Sports Med. 28, 91–122 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Katzmarzyk, P. T., Church, T. S., Craig, C. L. & Bouchard, C. Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 41, 998–1005 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wilmot, E. G. et al. Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 55, 2895–2905 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Biswas, A. et al. Sedentary time and its association with risk for disease incidence, mortality, and hospitalization in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 162, 123–132 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chandrasekaran, R., Katthula, V. & Moustakas, E. Patterns of use and key predictors for the use of wearable health care devices by US adults: insights from a national survey. J. Med. Internet Res. 22, e22443 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Feehan, L. M. et al. Accuracy of Fitbit devices: systematic review and narrative syntheses of quantitative data. JMIR MHealth UHealth 6, e10527 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chevance, G. et al. Accuracy and precision of energy expenditure, heart rate, and steps measured by combined-sensing Fitbits against reference measures: systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR MHealth UHealth 10, e35626 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Su, C. et al. Identification of Parkinson’s disease PACE subtypes and repurposing treatments through integrative analyses of multimodal data. NPJ Digit. Med. 7, 184 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yang, H. S. et al. Routine laboratory blood tests predict SARS-CoV-2 infection using machine learning. Clin. Chem. 66, 1396–1404 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Yang, H. S. et al. Machine learning highlights downtrending of COVID-19 patients with a distinct laboratory profile. Health Data Sci. 2021, 7574903 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Brendel, M., Su, C., Hou, Y., Henchcliffe, C. & Wang, F. Comprehensive subtyping of Parkinson’s disease patients with similarity fusion: a case study with BioFIND data. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 7, 83 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zang, C. et al. Identification of risk factors of Long COVID and predictive modeling in the RECOVER EHR cohorts. Commun. Med. 4, 130 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zang, C. et al. Accuracy and transportability of machine learning models for adolescent suicide prediction with longitudinal clinical records. Transl. Psychiatry 14, 316 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, grant number 1R21MD019134-01. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. We gratefully acknowledge All of Us participants for their contributions, without whom this research would not have been possible. We also thank the National Institutes of Health’s All of Us Research Program for making available the participant data examined in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Computational Health Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Yu Hou & Rui Zhang

  2. Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Yu Hou, Sayeed Ikramuddin & Rui Zhang

  3. Division of Biostatistics & Health Data Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Erjia Cui

  4. Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Kelvin Lim

  5. Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Lisa S. Chow

  6. Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Michael Howell

  7. Center for Learning Health System Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

    Rui Zhang

Authors
  1. Yu Hou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Erjia Cui
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kelvin Lim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lisa S. Chow
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael Howell
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Sayeed Ikramuddin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rui Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.H. and R.Z. conceived the study. Y.H. served as the principal author, extracting data, designing and conducting the entire experiment and writing the manuscript. E.C. assisted in conceiving the study design and reviewed the manuscript. S.I., K.L., L.S.C., and M.H. provided clinical expertise and reviewed the manuscript. All authors contributed to the production of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Medicine thanks Aiden Doherty and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplemental Information

Description of Additional Supplementary Files

Supplementary Data 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, Y., Cui, E., Lim, K. et al. Association of chronic disease risk and physical activity measured by wearable devices in the All of Us program. Commun Med (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-01372-x

Download citation

  • Received: 29 March 2025

  • Accepted: 30 December 2025

  • Published: 14 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-01372-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact
  • Conferences
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Posters
  • Editorial policies

Publish with us

  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Medicine (Commun Med)

ISSN 2730-664X (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing