Fig. 3: Mediation analysis of the effect of GLP-1R expression in pancreas on endometrioid ovarian cancer through metabolic factors. | Communications Medicine

Fig. 3: Mediation analysis of the effect of GLP-1R expression in pancreas on endometrioid ovarian cancer through metabolic factors.

From: Mendelian randomization study of GLP-1R effects on ovarian cancer subtypes mediated by metabolic factors

Fig. 3: Mediation analysis of the effect of GLP-1R expression in pancreas on endometrioid ovarian cancer through metabolic factors.

a Phenome-wide association scan for endometrioid ovarian cancer. The Manhattan plot displays associations between genetic instruments for GLP-1R expression and 2204 phenotypes, categorized by domain. The y-axis shows the strength of association (−log₁₀ P value) based on Mendelian randomization analysis results from EpiGraphDB. Red and blue horizontal lines indicate false discovery rate (FDR) thresholds of P-value < 0.05 and the genome-wide significance level (P-value < 5 × 10⁻⁸), respectively. b Schematic of significant mediators in the GLP-1R–endometrioid ovarian cancer pathway. The diagram summarizes mediators identified through two-step MR analysis, showing the proportion mediated for each. All mediated proportions were statistically significant after FDR correction (P-value < 0.05). c Association of candidate mediators with ovarian cancer histotypes. Forest plot displays MR estimates for six mediators—body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, arm fat mass, arm predicted mass, and 18:2 linoleic acid—across five ovarian cancer subtypes: high-grade serous (HGSOC), low-grade serous (LGSOC), mucinous (MOC), endometrioid (ENOC), and clear cell (CCOC). Points represent the causal estimate for the odds ratio (OR) derived from inverse-variance weighted MR analysis; error bars indicate 95% confidence intervals. All P-values were derived from two-sided inverse-variance weighted tests. Sample sizes for mediator–outcome analyses ranged from 41,953 to 462,117 individuals across phenotype combinations. Associations with an FDR < 0.05 were considered statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Associations with the ENOC subtype that were significant after FDR correction for multiple testing are highlighted in blue.

Back to article page