Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
Mapping neurophysiological biotypes of postpartum depression and underlying neural and molecular basis
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 02 March 2026

Mapping neurophysiological biotypes of postpartum depression and underlying neural and molecular basis

  • Jin Chen  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0008-1360-70191,2 na1,
  • Ying Liang1,2 na1,
  • Wei Li  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0000-0558-74001,2 na1,
  • Yashi Wu1,2,
  • Meiling Chen3,
  • Xingping Tao4,
  • Tiyan Zi5,
  • Xudong Dong6,
  • Bochao Cheng  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-9923-55097,
  • Kexuan Chen  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4771-26768 &
  • …
  • Jiaojian Wang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0421-57091,2 

Communications Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1332 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Emotion
  • Psychiatric disorders

Abstract

Background

Postpartum depression is a common and disabling condition that differs from major depressive disorder and shows marked variation in symptoms and outcomes. Identifying distinct biological subtypes could improve diagnosis and treatment. The present study aims to uncover neurophysiological subtypes of postpartum depression and explore their underlying neural and molecular features.

Methods

We analyzed structural brain images from a cohort of postpartum women recruited at the West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, including 76 patients with postpartum depression (age range: 24-39 years) and 62 healthy postpartum women (age range: 23-40 years). An unsupervised clustering approach was applied to gray matter volume patterns to identify neurobiological subtypes. Individualized structural covariance networks were then constructed to compare subtype-specific connectivity. Transcriptomic profiles and neurotransmitter density maps were further integrated to examine molecular mechanisms underlying the structural alterations.

Results

Here we show that postpartum depression can be divided into two neurobiological subtypes. Subtype 1 displays reduced gray matter volume in the dorsal attention network, consistent with cognitive impairments. Subtype 2 shows increased gray matter volume in the default mode network, reflecting emotional dysregulation. Subtype 2 also exhibits weaker structural connectivity between the middle temporal gyrus, parahippocampus, and amygdala. Molecular analysis indicates that Subtype 1 is related to energy metabolism and the neurotransmitter receptor mGluR5, whereas Subtype 2 is associated with synaptic regulation, neuroplasticity, and neurotransmitter receptors such as 5-HT1B, dopamine D2, cholinergic M1 and μ-opioid receptor (MOR).

Conclusions

These findings suggest that postpartum depression comprises two biologically distinct forms with different cognitive and emotional characteristics. Recognizing these subtypes may enhance our understanding of its neuropathology and support the development of personalized therapeutic strategies.

Plain language summary

After childbirth, some women experience a serious form of depression called postpartum depression. This condition affects thinking, emotions, and daily life, but not all women experience it in the same way. In this study, we used brain scans to see if there are different types of postpartum depression based on brain structure. We found two groups: one showing changes in brain areas linked to attention and thinking, and another showing changes in regions involved in emotions. These differences were also reflected in brain chemistry and gene activity. Our findings suggest that postpartum depression is not one single disorder, and understanding its biological types may help doctors offer more personalized care and treatment in the future.

Similar content being viewed by others

Individualized gray matter morphological abnormalities unveil two neuroanatomical obsessive-compulsive disorder subtypes

Article Open access 24 January 2025

Identifying subtypes based on environmental and neurobiological risk and resilience factors of postpartum maternal mental health

Article Open access 26 November 2025

Uncovering the neurophysiology of mood, motivation and behavioral symptoms in Parkinson’s disease through intracranial recordings

Article Open access 21 September 2023

Data availability

Source data underlying the analyses presented in Figs. 1–4 are available in Supplementary Data Sheets 1–4. The dataset analyzed in this study is available upon request to the corresponding authors.

References

  1. Payne, J. L. & Maguire, J. Pathophysiological mechanisms implicated in postpartum depression. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 52, 165–180 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Falah-Hassani, K., Shiri, R. & Dennis, C. L. Prevalence and risk factors for comorbid postpartum depressive symptomatology and anxiety. J. Affect. Disord. 198, 142–147 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Batt, M. M., Duffy, K. A., Novick, A. M., Metcalf, C. A. & Epperson, C. N. Is postpartum depression different from depression occurring outside of the perinatal period? A review of the evidence. Focus (Am. Psychiatr. Publ.) 18, 106–119 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pearlstein, T., Howard, M., Salisbury, A. & Zlotnick, C. Postpartum depression. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 200, 357–364 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng, B. et al. Postpartum depression and major depressive disorder: the same or not? Evidence from resting-state functional MRI. Psychoradiology 2, 121–128 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wisner, K. L., Moses-Kolko, E. L. & Sit, D. K. Postpartum depression: a disorder in search of a definition. Arch. Women’s. Ment. Health 13, 37–40 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Farr, S. L., Dietz, P. M., O’Hara, M. W., Burley, K. & Ko, J. Y. Postpartum anxiety and comorbid depression in a population-based sample of women. J. Women’s Health (2002) 23, 120–128 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodman, J. H. Paternal postpartum depression, its relationship to maternal postpartum depression, and implications for family health. J. Adv. Nurs. 45, 26–35 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hendrick, V., Altshuler, L., Strouse, T. & Grosser, S. Postpartum and nonpostpartum depression: differences in presentation and response to pharmacologic treatment. Depress. Anxiety 11, 66–72 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cheng, B. et al. Abnormal dynamics of resting-state functional activity and couplings in postpartum depression with and without anxiety. Cereb. Cortex 32, 5597–5608 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng, B. et al. Social support mediates the influence of cerebellum functional connectivity strength on postpartum depression and postpartum depression with anxiety. Transl. Psychiatry 12, 54 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cheng, B. et al. Altered functional connectivity density and couplings in postpartum depression with and without anxiety. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 17, 756–766 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brucar, L. R., Feczko, E., Fair, D. A. & Zilverstand, A. Current approaches in computational psychiatry for the data-driven identification of brain-based subtypes. Biol. Psychiatry 93, 704–716 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Drysdale, A. T. et al. Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nat. Med. 23, 28–38 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, J. et al. Neural–genetic–environmental evidence for a disease factor in mental and physical health multimorbidity. Nat. Commun. 16, 10088 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wen, J. V. E. et al. Subtyping brain diseases from imaging data. In Machine Learning for Brain Disorders Ch. 16 (ed., Colliot, O.) (Humana, 2023).

  17. Wang, H., Jin, X., Zhang, Y. & Wang, J. Single-subject morphological brain networks: connectivity mapping, topological characterization and test–retest reliability. Brain Behav. 6, e00448 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, H. et al. Mapping individual structural covariance network in development brain with dynamic time warping. Cereb. Cortex 34, bhae039 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kassem, M. S. et al. Stress-induced grey matter loss determined by mri is primarily due to loss of dendrites and their synapses. Mol. Neurobiol. 47, 645–661 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gogtay, N. & Thompson, P. M. Mapping gray matter development: implications for typical development and vulnerability to psychopathology. Brain Cogn. 72, 6–15 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cheng, B. et al. Prolactin mediates the relationship between regional gray matter volume and postpartum depression symptoms. J. Affect. Disord. 301, 253–259 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alexander-Bloch, A., Giedd, J. N. & Bullmore, E. Imaging structural co-variance between human brain regions. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 322–336 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mechelli, A., Friston, K. J., Frackowiak, R. S. & Price, C. J. Structural covariance in the human cortex. J. Neurosci. 25, 8303–8310 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zielinski, B. A., Gennatas, E. D., Zhou, J. & Seeley, W. W. Network-level structural covariance in the developing brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18191–18196 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Montembeault, M. et al. The impact of aging on gray matter structural covariance networks. NeuroImage 63, 754–759 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, S. et al. Using individualized structural covariance networks to analyze the heterogeneity of cerebral small vessel disease with cognitive impairment. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 33, 107829 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Han, S. et al. Resolving heterogeneity in depression using individualized structural covariance network analysis. Psychol. Med. 53, 5312–5321 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liu, Z. et al. Resolving heterogeneity in schizophrenia through a novel systems approach to brain structure: individualized structural covariance network analysis. Mol. Psychiatry 26, 7719–7731 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, H. et al. Reorganization of cortical individualized differential structural covariance network is associated with regional morphometric changes in chronic subcortical stroke. NeuroImage Clin. 45, 103735 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li, W. et al. Disentangling the switching behavior in functional connectivity dynamics in autism spectrum disorder: insights from developmental cohort analysis and molecular-cellular associations. Adv. Sci. (Weinh.) 12, e2403801 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M. & Sagovsky, R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br. J. Psychiatry 150, 782–786 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. & Erbaugh, J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 4, 561–571 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G. & Steer, R. A. An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: psychometric properties. J. Consult Clin. Psychol. 56, 893–897 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Buysse, D. J., Reynolds, C. F. 3rd, Monk, T. H., Berman, S. R. & Kupfer, D. J. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 28, 193–213 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Logsdon, M. C. & Usui, W. M. The Postpartum Support Questionnaire: psychometric properties in adolescents. J. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Nurs. 19, 145–156 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cohen, S. & Williamson, G. M. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), In CLAR Symposium Soc. Psychol. Health, 31–67 (Sage Publications, Inc. 1988).

  37. Ashburner, J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage 38, 95–113 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Margulies, D. S. et al. Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 12574–12579 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hawrylycz, M. J. et al. An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 489, 391–399 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Markello, R. D. et al. Standardizing workflows in imaging transcriptomics with the abagen toolbox. Elife 10, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72129 (2021).

  41. Arnatkeviciute, A., Fulcher, B. D. & Fornito, A. A practical guide to linking brain-wide gene expression and neuroimaging data. Neuroimage 189, 353–367 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schaefer, A. et al. Local–global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Cereb. Cortex 28, 3095–3114 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hansen, J. Y. et al. Mapping neurotransmitter systems to the structural and functional organization of the human neocortex. Nat. Neurosci. 25, 1569–1581 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bauer, A. E. et al. Identification and validation of postpartum depression subtypes: a population-based cohort study. EClinicalMedicine 89, 103540 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chen, K. et al. Shared and disorder-specific large-scale intrinsic and effective functional network connectivities in postpartum depression with and without anxiety. Cereb. Cortex 34, https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhae478 (2024).

  46. Chen, K. X. et al. Molecular basis underlying default mode network functional abnormalities in postpartum depression with and without anxiety. Hum. Brain Mapp. 45, e26657 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Batty, M. J. et al. Cortical gray matter in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a structural magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 49, 229–238 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cafiero, P. J. & Justich Zabala, P. Postpartum depression: impact on pregnant women and the postnatal physical, emotional, and cognitive development of their children. An ecological perspective. Arch. Argent. Pediatr. 122, e202310217 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Qiu, T., Wen, H., Liu, Z. X., Pan, X. P. & Zeng, T. Investigation regarding early cognitive function of women in the postpartum period and the analysis of influencing factors. Risk Manag. Health Policy 14, 3747–3754 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ives-Deliperi, V. & Butler, J. T. Mechanisms of cognitive impairment in temporal lobe epilepsy: a systematic review of resting-state functional connectivity studies. Epilepsy Behav. 115, 107686 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Huang, S., Li, M., Huang, C. & Liu, J. Acute limbic system connectivity predicts chronic cognitive function in mild traumatic brain injury: an individualized differential structural covariance network study. Pharm. Res. 206, 107274 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Liu, Y. et al. Transcriptional patterns of amygdala functional connectivity in first-episode, drug-naive major depressive disorder. Transl. Psychiatry 14, 351 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Ramasubbu, R. et al. Reduced intrinsic connectivity of amygdala in adults with major depressive disorder. Front. Psychiatry 5, 17 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sun, H. et al. Functional connectivity analyses of individual hippocampal subregions in major depressive disorder with electroconvulsive therapy. Psychoradiology 4, kkae030 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Moreira, L. K. S. et al. Post-partum depression: from clinical understanding to preclinical assessments. Front. Psychiatry 14, 1173635 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Okun, M. L. Disturbed sleep and postpartum depression. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 18, 66 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tabaeifard, R. et al. Association between oxidative balance score and risk of postpartum depression in Iranian women: a prospective cohort study. Sci. Rep. 15, 8590 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Gorman-Sandler, E. et al. Mitochondrial might: powering the peripartum for risk and resilience. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 17, 1286811 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. McEwen, A. M. et al. Increased glutamate levels in the medial prefrontal cortex in patients with postpartum depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 37, 2428–2435 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ghuman, A. et al. Prospective investigation of glutamate levels and percentage gray matter in the medial prefrontal cortex in females at risk for postpartum depression. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 20, 1988–2000 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Quoidbach, J., Mikolajczak, M. & Gross, J. J. Positive interventions: an emotion regulation perspective. Psychol. Bull. 141, 655–693 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Brown, J. V. E. et al. Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD013560, (2021).

  63. Raichle, M. E. The brain’s default mode network. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 38, 433–447 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Raichle, M. E. et al. A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 676–682 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Chase, H. W., Moses-Kolko, E. L., Zevallos, C., Wisner, K. L. & Phillips, M. L. Disrupted posterior cingulate–amygdala connectivity in postpartum depressed women as measured with resting BOLD fMRI. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 9, 1069–1075 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Duan, C., Cosgrove, J. & Deligiannidis, K. M. Understanding peripartum depression through neuroimaging: a review of structural and functional connectivity and molecular imaging research. Curr. Psychiatry Rep. 19, 70 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kim, P. et al. The plasticity of human maternal brain: longitudinal changes in brain anatomy during the early postpartum period. Behav. Neurosci. 124, 695–700 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Wang, J. et al. The critical mediating roles of the middle temporal gyrus and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex in the dynamic processing of interpersonal emotion regulation. Neuroimage 300, 120789 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Šimić, G. et al. Understanding emotions: origins and roles of the amygdala. Biomolecules 11, https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11060823 (2021).

  70. Zhu, Y. et al. Emotion regulation of hippocampus using real-time fMRI neurofeedback in healthy human. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13, 242 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Landi, N. et al. Maternal neural responses to infant cries and faces: relationships with substance use. Front. Psychiatry 2, 32 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Chen, G. et al. Environmental enrichment attenuates depressive-like behavior in maternal rats by inhibiting neuroinflammation and apoptosis and promoting neuroplasticity. Neurobiol. Stress 30, 100624 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Post, C. & Leuner, B. The maternal reward system in postpartum depression. Arch. Women’s Ment. Health 22, 417–429 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Jacob, Y. et al. Neural correlates of rumination in major depressive disorder: a brain network analysis. Neuroimage Clin. 25, 102142 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Benarroch, E. E. Synaptic effects of cannabinoids: complexity, behavioral effects, and potential clinical implications. Neurology 83, 1958–1967 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ribeiro, S. C., Kennedy, S. E., Smith, Y. R., Stohler, C. S. & Zubieta, J. K. Interface of physical and emotional stress regulation through the endogenous opioid system and mu-opioid receptors. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 29, 1264–1280 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Delgado, P. L. Depression: the case for a monoamine deficiency. J. Clin. Psychiatry 61(Suppl. 6), 7–11 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Della Corte, L. et al. Prevalence and associated psychological risk factors of postpartum depression: a cross-sectional study. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 42, 976–980 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Hopkins, J., Marcus, M. & Campbell, S. B. Postpartum depression: a critical review. Psychol. Bull. 95, 498–515 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Costa-Brito, A. R., Goncalves, I. & Santos, C. R. A. The brain as a source and a target of prolactin in mammals. Neural Regen. Res. 17, 1695–1702 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Xu, Y. et al. The association between prolactin levels and cognitive function in female patients with severe mental disorders. Psychiatry Investig. 21, 832–837 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects (202501AV070005), National Natural Science Foundation of China (32560206), Yunnan Provincial International Joint R&D Center for Precision Healthcare in Maternal-Fetal Medicine (202503AP140051), Key Research and Development Plan of Yunnan Province (202403AC100002), Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2024TFFK0361), Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing (CSTB2024NSCQ-MSX1116), and Open Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Brain–Machine Intelligence, Zhejiang University (BMI2500002).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Jin Chen, Ying Liang, Wei Li.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China

    Jin Chen, Ying Liang, Wei Li, Yashi Wu & Jiaojian Wang

  2. Yunnan Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Kunming, China

    Jin Chen, Ying Liang, Wei Li, Yashi Wu & Jiaojian Wang

  3. Department of Clinical Psychology, the First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China

    Meiling Chen

  4. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Children’s Hospital, People’s Hospital of Kaiyuan, Kaiyuan, China

    Xingping Tao

  5. Obstetrics Department, People’s Hospital of Kaiyuan, Kaiyuan, China

    Tiyan Zi

  6. Obstetrics Department, the First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China

    Xudong Dong

  7. Department of Radiology, West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Bochao Cheng

  8. Medical School, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China

    Kexuan Chen

Authors
  1. Jin Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ying Liang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yashi Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Meiling Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xingping Tao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tiyan Zi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xudong Dong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Bochao Cheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kexuan Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Jiaojian Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.W., K.C., B.C., and X.D. contributed to the conception and design of the study. J.C., Y.L., W.L., M.C., and Y.W. contributed to the acquisition and analysis of data; P.X., X.T., and T.Z. contributed to material preparation and data collection; J.C., Y.L., B.C., K.C., and J.W. wrote and edited the manuscript. All the authors discussed the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xudong Dong, Bochao Cheng, Kexuan Chen or Jiaojian Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Medicine thanks Yasmin Harrington, Xiaoyu Tong and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary files (download DOCX )

Supplementary Data 1-4 (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Liang, Y., Li, W. et al. Mapping neurophysiological biotypes of postpartum depression and underlying neural and molecular basis. Commun Med (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01477-x

Download citation

  • Received: 24 June 2025

  • Accepted: 17 February 2026

  • Published: 02 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01477-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Women’s Health

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact
  • Conferences
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Posters
  • Editorial policies

Publish with us

  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Medicine (Commun Med)

ISSN 2730-664X (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing