Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 maleate promotes retinal ganglion cell differentiation and protects the retino-visual circuits
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 02 April 2026

The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 maleate promotes retinal ganglion cell differentiation and protects the retino-visual circuits

  • Sayanta Dutta1,
  • Michelle L. Surma1,
  • Jie Chen2,
  • Kavitha Anbarasu1,3,
  • Jingwei Meng4,
  • Nian Wang2,5,6 &
  • …
  • Arupratan Das  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1449-79111,3,4,7 

Communications Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Drug screening
  • Regeneration and repair in the nervous system
  • Retina

Abstract

Background

Growing evidence implicates early metabolic dysfunctions in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) as a contributor to both high- and normal-tension glaucoma, yet no approved therapy directly protects RGCs to preserve vision. We aimed at identifying a safe, druggable neuroprotective strategy that restores RGC metabolic homeostasis for glaucoma therapy.

Methods

Using a live-cell mitochondrial screen in human embryonic stem cell-derived retinal ganglion cells (H7; female donor), we identified the clinically tested 5-HT1A antagonist WAY-100635 (WAY) as a neuroprotective agent. Mechanisms are probed by pharmacologic competition with agonist 8-OH-DPAT, cAMP assays, and PGC-1α dependent mitochondrial-biogenesis tests. RGC metabolism and survival are assessed by Seahorse and apoptosis assays. In vivo efficacy is evaluated in acute optic-nerve crush (ONC) and microbead-induced ocular-hypertension glaucoma models using histology, brain MRI, visual-acuity, contrast sensitivity testing, and flash VEPs to quantify cortical responses in wild-type C57BL/6 J male mice. Statistics used two-tailed Student’s t-tests or ANOVA, as appropriate.

Results

Here we show that WAY elicits a reversible cAMP surge that drives PGC-1α dependent mitochondrial biogenesis and reduces apoptosis in hRGCs. In glaucoma-associated OPTNE50K hRGCs, it restores mitochondrial fitness, attenuates excitotoxicity, and shifts metabolism toward aerobic glycolysis, while in progenitors, WAY enhances cristae maturation, oxidative phosphorylation, accelerating RGC specification. Systemic dosing in ONC mice preserves RGC somata, retinal function (PhNR), and optic-pathway integrity. WAY-treated glaucoma mice show preserved visual acuity and fVEP propagation to cortex, halting glaucoma progression.

Conclusions

A clinically tested 5-HT1A antagonist WAY restores RGC metabolic homeostasis and preserves visual-pathway function across acute and chronic injury models, without detected systemic toxicity, supporting development of a neuroprotective candidate for glaucoma and potentially for other mitochondrial optic neuropathies.

Plain Language Summary

Glaucoma slowly damages the nerve cells called retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) that carry signals from the eye to the brain. Current treatments mainly lower eye pressure but even when treated, many patients continue to lose vision. We screened for various possible compounds on human RGCs and discovered a drug already tested in people for another reason keeps RGCs alive during optic nerve injury and maintains the ability for visual signals to move from the eye to the brain, including in conditions where glaucoma develops. These results suggest this treatment could be used alongside pressure-lowering treatments to preserve vision. Further testing is needed to check this would be suitable for people with glaucoma.

Data availability

The resources used in this study have been detailed in the method and Supplemental table 1, and source data are available in Supplementary Data 2. Requests for further information and resources should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Arupratan Das (arupdas@iu.edu). All uncropped images for western blots are presented in the Supplementary Fig. 6 and flow cytometry gating steps are presented in the Supplementary Fig. 7.

References

  1. Quigley, H. A. Understanding glaucomatous optic neuropathy: the synergy between clinical observation and investigation. Annu Rev. Vis. Sci. 2, 235–254 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Das, A. & Imanishi, Y. Drug discovery strategies for inherited retinal degenerations. Biology 11, 1338 (2022).

  3. Susanna, R. Jr, De Moraes, C. G., Cioffi, G. A. & Ritch, R. Why do people (still) go blind from glaucoma?. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 4, 1 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sommer, A. et al. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch. Ophthalmol. 109, 1090–1095 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Calkins, D. J. Critical pathogenic events underlying progression of neurodegeneration in glaucoma. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 31, 702–719 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, Z. Q., Xie, Z., Chen, S. Y. & Zhang, X. Mitochondrial dysfunction in glaucomatous degeneration. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 16, 811–823 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baltan, S. et al. Metabolic vulnerability disposes retinal ganglion cell axons to dysfunction in a model of glaucomatous degeneration. J. Neurosci. 30, 5644–5652 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crish, S. D. & Calkins, D. J. Central visual pathways in glaucoma: evidence for distal mechanisms of neuronal self-repair. J. Neuroophthalmol. 35, S29–S37 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Risner, M. L., Pasini, S., Cooper, M. L., Lambert, W. S. & Calkins, D. J. Axogenic mechanism enhances retinal ganglion cell excitability during early progression in glaucoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, E2393–e2402 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Au, N. P. B. et al. A small molecule M1 promotes optic nerve regeneration to restore target-specific neural activity and visual function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2121273119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cartoni, R. et al. The mammalian-specific protein Armcx1 regulates mitochondrial transport during axon regeneration. Neuron 92, 1294–1307 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Quintero, H. et al. Restoration of mitochondria axonal transport by adaptor Disc1 supplementation prevents neurodegeneration and rescues visual function. Cell Rep. 40, 111324 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, D. et al. Optineurin-facilitated axonal mitochondria delivery promotes neuroprotection and axon regeneration. Nat. Commun. 16, 1789 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Harder, J. M. et al. Disturbed glucose and pyruvate metabolism in glaucoma with neuroprotection by pyruvate or rapamycin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 33619–33627 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tribble et al. Nicotinamide provides neuroprotection in glaucoma by protecting against mitochondrial and metabolic dysfunction. Redox Biol. 43, 101988 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Williams, P. A. et al. Vitamin B(3) modulates mitochondrial vulnerability and prevents glaucoma in aged mice. Science 355, 756–760 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gozlan, H., Thibault, S., Laporte, A. M., Lima, L. & Hamon, M. The selective 5-HT1A antagonist radioligand [3H]WAY 100635 labels both G-protein-coupled and free 5-HT1A receptors in rat brain membranes. Eur. J. Pharm. 288, 173–186 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Forster, E. A. et al. A pharmacological profile of the selective silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY-100635. Eur. J. Pharm. 281, 81–88 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rezaie, T. et al. Adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma caused by mutations in optineurin. Science 295, 1077–1079 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Surma, M. et al. Enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis promotes neuroprotection in human pluripotent stem cell derived retinal ganglion cells. Commun. Biol. 6, 218 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sluch, V. M. et al. Enhanced Stem Cell Differentiation and Immunopurification of Genome Engineered Human Retinal Ganglion Cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 6, 1972–1986 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Das, A., Bell, C. M., Berlinicke, C. A., Marsh-Armstrong, N. & Zack, D. J. Programmed switch in the mitochondrial degradation pathways during human retinal ganglion cell differentiation from stem cells is critical for RGC survival. Redox Biol. 34, 101465 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sardar Pasha, S. P. B. et al. Ref-1/APE1 inhibition with novel small molecules blocks ocular neovascularization. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 367, 108–118 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Baine, R. E. et al. Noxious stimulation induces acute hemorrhage and impairs long-term recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) in female rats: evidence estrous cycle may have a modulatory effect. Neurotrauma Rep. 3, 70–86 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shanley, M. R. et al. Estrous cycle mediates midbrain neuron excitability altering social behavior upon stress. J. Neurosci. 43, 736–748 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shaw, G. A. Mitochondria as the target for disease related hormonal dysregulation. Brain Behav. Immun. Health 18, 100350 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kimball, E. et al. The role of aquaporin-4 in optic nerve head astrocytes in experimental glaucoma. PLOS One 16, e0244123 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Quillen, S. et al. Astrocyte responses to experimental glaucoma in mouse optic nerve head. PLOS One 15, e0238104 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Feng, Q., Wong, K. A. & Benowitz, L. I. Full-length optic nerve regeneration in the absence of genetic manipulations. JCI Insight 8, e164579 (2023).

  30. Lindborg, J. A. et al. Optic nerve regeneration screen identifies multiple genes restricting adult neural repair. Cell Rep. 34, 108777 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Madhoun, S. et al. Effects of experimental glaucoma in Lama1(nmf223) mutant mice. Exp. Eye Res. 226, 109341 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Korneva, A. et al. A method to quantify regional axonal transport blockade at the optic nerve head after short term intraocular pressure elevation in mice. Exp. Eye Res. 196, 108035 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Takita, S. et al. Rhodopsin mislocalization drives ciliary dysregulation in a novel autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa knock-in mouse model. FASEB J. 38, e23606 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Benowitz, L. I., Apostolides, P. J., Perrone-Bizzozero, N., Finklestein, S. P. & Zwiers, H. Anatomical distribution of the growth-associated protein GAP-43/B-50 in the adult rat brain. J. Neurosci. 8, 339–352 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Xie, L. et al. Monocyte-derived SDF1 supports optic nerve regeneration and alters retinal ganglion cells’ response to Pten deletion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2113751119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Peterson, S. L. et al. Retinal ganglion cell axon regeneration requires complement and myeloid cell activity within the optic nerve. J. Neurosci. 41, 8508–8531 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Leon, S., Yin, Y., Nguyen, J., Irwin, N. & Benowitz, L. I. Lens injury stimulates axon regeneration in the mature rat optic nerve. J. Neurosci. 20, 4615–4626 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Prusky, G. T., Alam, N. M. & Douglas, R. M. Enhancement of vision by monocular deprivation in adult mice. J. Neurosci. 26, 11554–11561 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Prusky, G. T., Alam, N. M., Beekman, S. & Douglas, R. M. Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 45, 4611–4616 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Veraart, J. et al. Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. Neuroimage 142, 394–406 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kellner, E., Dhital, B., Kiselev, V. G. & Reisert, M. Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts. Magn. Reson. Med. 76, 1574–1581 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Andersson, J. L. R. & Sotiropoulos, S. N. An integrated approach to correction for off-resonance effects and subject movement in diffusion MR imaging. Neuroimage 125, 1063–1078 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tournier, J. D. et al. MRtrix3: a fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation. Neuroimage 202, 116137 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Basser, P. J., Mattiello, J. & LeBihan, D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys. J. 66, 259–267 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jensen, J. H., Helpern, J. A., Ramani, A., Lu, H. & Kaczynski, K. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 53, 1432–1440 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zhang, H., Schneider, T., Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. & Alexander, D. C. NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. Neuroimage 61, 1000–1016 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tournier, J. D., Calamante, F. & Connelly, A. Robust determination of the fibre orientation distribution in diffusion MRI: Non-negativity constrained super-resolved spherical deconvolution. NeuroImage 35, 1459–1472 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Smith, R. E., Tournier, J.-D., Calamante, F. & Connelly, A. SIFT: Spherical-deconvolution informed filtering of tractograms. NeuroImage 67, 298–312 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Xiao, B., Deng, X., Zhou, W. & Tan, E. K. Flow cytometry-based assessment of mitophagy using MitoTracker. Front. Cell Neurosci. 10, 76 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Pereiro, X., Miltner, A. M., La Torre, A. & Vecino, E. Effects of adult müller cells and their conditioned media on the survival of stem cell-derived retinal ganglion cells. Cells 9, 1759 (2020).

  51. Ieni, J. R. & Meyerson, L. R. The 5-HT1A receptor probe [3H]8-OH-DPAT labels the 5-HT transporter in human platelets. Life Sci. 42, 311–320 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Nikolaus, S. et al. The 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT modulates motor/exploratory activity, recognition memory and dopamine transporter binding in the dorsal and ventral striatum. Neurobiol. Learn Mem. 205, 107848 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Raymond, J. R., Mukhin, Y. V., Gettys, T. W. & Garnovskaya, M. N. The recombinant 5-HT1A receptor: G protein coupling and signalling pathways. Br. J. Pharm. 127, 1751–1764 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Reggiani, J. D. S. et al. Brainstem serotonin neurons selectively gate retinal information flow to thalamus. Neuron 111, 711–726.e711 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Boczek, T. et al. cAMP at perinuclear mAKAPα signalosomes is regulated by local Ca(2+) signaling in primary hippocampal neurons. eNeuro 8, ENEURO.0298-20.2021 (2021).

  56. Corredor, R. G. et al. Soluble adenylyl cyclase activity is necessary for retinal ganglion cell survival and axon growth. J. Neurosci. 32, 7734–7744 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Farde, L. et al. PET-characterization of [carbonyl-11C]WAY-100635 binding to 5-HT1A receptors in the primate brain. Psychopharmacology 133, 196–202 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Marona-Lewicka, D. & Nichols, D. E. WAY 100635 produces discriminative stimulus effects in rats mediated by dopamine D(4) receptor activation. Behav. Pharm. 20, 114–118 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chemel, B. R., Roth, B. L., Armbruster, B., Watts, V. J. & Nichols, D. E. WAY-100635 is a potent dopamine D4 receptor agonist. Psychopharmacology 188, 244–251 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Petelák, A., Lambert, N. A. & Bondar, A. Serotonin 5-HT(7) receptor slows down the G(s) protein: a single molecule perspective. Mol. Biol. Cell 34, br14 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sprouse, J., Reynolds, L., Li, X., Braselton, J. & Schmidt, A. 8-OH-DPAT as a 5-HT7 agonist: phase shifts of the circadian biological clock through increases in cAMP production. Neuropharmacology 46, 52–62 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Xing, F. et al. The anti-Warburg effect elicited by the cAMP-PGC1α pathway drives differentiation of glioblastoma cells into astrocytes. Cell Rep. 18, 468–481 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Schinder, A. F., Olson, E. C., Spitzer, N. C. & Montal, M. Mitochondrial dysfunction is a primary event in glutamate neurotoxicity. J. Neurosci. 16, 6125–6133 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  64. VanderWall, K. B. et al. Retinal ganglion cells with a glaucoma OPTN(E50K) mutation exhibit neurodegenerative phenotypes when derived from three-dimensional retinal organoids. Stem Cell Rep. 15, 52–66 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Soni, A. et al. Improved method for efficient generation of functional neurons from murine neural progenitor cells. Cells 10, 1894 (2021).

  66. Mossink, B. et al. Human neuronal networks on micro-electrode arrays are a highly robust tool to study disease-specific genotype-phenotype correlations in vitro. Stem Cell Rep. 16, 2182–2196 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Odawara, A., Saitoh, Y., Alhebshi, A. H., Gotoh, M. & Suzuki, I. Long-term electrophysiological activity and pharmacological response of a human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neuron and astrocyte co-culture. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 443, 1176–1181 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Tezel, G. Oxidative stress in glaucomatous neurodegeneration: mechanisms and consequences. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 25, 490–513 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Zhu, J., Li, P., Zhou, Y. G. & Ye, J. Altered energy metabolism during early optic nerve crush injury: implications of warburg-like aerobic glycolysis in facilitating retinal ganglion cell survival. Neurosci. Bull. 36, 761–777 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Goyal, M. S. et al. Brain aerobic glycolysis and resilience in Alzheimer disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2212256120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Jacobi, A. et al. Overlapping transcriptional programs promote survival and axonal regeneration of injured retinal ganglion cells. Neuron 110, 2625–2645.e2627 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Folmes, C. D. & Terzic, A. Energy metabolism in the acquisition and maintenance of stemness. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 52, 68–75 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Qiu, F., Jiang, H. & Xiang, M. A comprehensive negative regulatory program controlled by Brn3b to ensure ganglion cell specification from multipotential retinal precursors. J. Neurosci. 28, 3392 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Miltner, A. M. et al. A novel reporter mouse uncovers endogenous Brn3b expression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 2903 (2019).

  75. Heavner, W. & Pevny, L. Eye development and retinogenesis. Cold Spring. Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a008391 (2012).

  76. Samuel, A. et al. Six3 regulates optic nerve development via multiple mechanisms. Sci. Rep. 6, 20267 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Zheng, X. et al. Metabolic reprogramming during neuronal differentiation from aerobic glycolysis to neuronal oxidative phosphorylation. Elife 5, e13374 (2016).

  78. Zhou, W. et al. TIGAR promotes neural stem cell differentiation through acetyl-CoA-mediated histone acetylation. Cell Death Dis. 10, 198 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Pauklin, S. & Vallier, L. The cell-cycle state of stem cells determines cell fate propensity. Cell 155, 135–147 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Iwata, R. et al. Mitochondria metabolism sets the species-specific tempo of neuronal development. Science 379, eabn4705 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Lukas, T. J., Wang, A. L., Yuan, M. & Neufeld, A. H. Early cellular signaling responses to axonal injury. Cell Commun. Signal 7, 5 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Sánchez-Migallón, M. C., Valiente-Soriano, F. J., Nadal-Nicolás, F. M., Vidal-Sanz, M. & Agudo-Barriuso, M. Apoptotic retinal ganglion cell death after optic nerve transection or crush in mice: delayed rgc loss with BDNF or a caspase 3 inhibitor. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 57, 81–93 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Leung, C. K. et al. Longitudinal profile of retinal ganglion cell damage after optic nerve crush with blue-light confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 49, 4898–4902 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Kwong, J. M., Caprioli, J. & Piri, N. RNA binding protein with multiple splicing: a new marker for retinal ganglion cells. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51, 1052–1058 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Pereiro, X., Ruzafa, N., Urcola, J. H., Sharma, S. C. & Vecino, E. Differential distribution of RBPMS in pig, rat, and human retina after damage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 9330 (2020).

  86. Hoffman, P. N. Expression of GAP-43, a rapidly transported growth-associated protein, and class II beta tubulin, a slowly transported cytoskeletal protein, are coordinated in regenerating neurons. J. Neurosci. 9, 893–897 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Benowitz, L., Shashoua, V. & Yoon, M. Specific changes in rapidly transported proteins during regeneration of the goldfish optic nerve. J. Neurosci. 1, 300–307 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Li, Y. et al. Mobile zinc increases rapidly in the retina after optic nerve injury and regulates ganglion cell survival and optic nerve regeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E209–e218 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Cheng, Y. et al. Transcription factor network analysis identifies REST/NRSF as an intrinsic regulator of CNS regeneration in mice. Nat. Commun. 13, 4418 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Shekhar, K., Whitney, I. E., Butrus, S., Peng, Y.-R. & Sanes, J. R. Diversification of multipotential postmitotic mouse retinal ganglion cell precursors into discrete types. eLife 11, e73809 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Tran, N. M. et al. Single-cell profiles of retinal ganglion cells differing in resilience to injury reveal neuroprotective genes. Neuron 104, 1039–1055.e1012 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Markowitz, G. S., Bomback, A. S. & Perazella, M. A. Drug-induced glomerular disease: direct cellular injury. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 10, 1291–1299 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Kleiner, D. E. Recent advances in the histopathology of drug-induced liver injury. Surg. Pathol. Clin. 11, 297–311 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Mendoza, M., Shotbolt, M., Faiq, M. A., Parra, C. & Chan, K. C. Advanced diffusion MRI of the visual system in glaucoma: from experimental animal models to humans. Biology 11, 454 (2022).

  95. Trivedi, V. et al. Widespread brain reorganization perturbs visuomotor coordination in early glaucoma. Sci. Rep. 9, 14168 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Deng, W., Faiq, M. A., Liu, C., Adi, V. & Chan, K. C. Applications of manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in ophthalmology and visual neuroscience. Front. Neural Circuits 13, 35 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Henriques, R. N., Henson, R., Cam-CAN & Correia, M. M. Unique information from common diffusion MRI models about white-matter differences across the human adult lifespan. Imaging Neurosci. 1, 1–25 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Frishman, L. et al. ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram. Doc. Ophthalmol. 136, 207–211 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Jnawali, A., Lin, X., Patel, N. B., Frishman, L. J. & Ostrin, L. A. Retinal ganglion cell ablation in guinea pigs. Exp. Eye Res. 202, 108339 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Prencipe, M., Perossini, T., Brancoli, G. & Perossini, M. The photopic negative response (PhNR): measurement approaches and utility in glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol. 40, 3565–3576 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Cone, F. E., Gelman, S. E., Son, J. L., Pease, M. E. & Quigley, H. A. Differential susceptibility to experimental glaucoma among 3 mouse strains using bead and viscoelastic injection. Exp. Eye Res. 91, 415–424 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Chen, P. P. Correlation of visual field progression between eyes in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 109, 2093–2099 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Cooper, M. L. et al. Redistribution of metabolic resources through astrocyte networks mitigates neurodegenerative stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 18810–18821 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Frankfort, B. J. et al. Elevated intraocular pressure causes inner retinal dysfunction before cell loss in a mouse model of experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54, 762–770 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Chen, H. et al. Commensal microflora-induced T cell responses mediate progressive neurodegeneration in glaucoma. Nat. Commun. 9, 3209 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Bond, W. S. et al. Virus-mediated EpoR76E therapy slows optic nerve axonopathy in experimental glaucoma. Mol. Ther. 24, 230–239 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Claes, M. et al. A fair assessment of evaluation tools for the murine microbead occlusion model of glaucoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 5633 (2021).

  108. Creel, D. J., Dustman, R. E. & Beck, E. C. Visually evoked responses in the rat, guinea pig, cat, monkey, and man. Exp. Neurol. 40, 351–366 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Woo, K. M., Guo, Y., Mehrabian, Z., Miller, N. R. & Bernstein, S. L. Refining flash visual evoked potential analysis in rats: a novel approach using bilateral epidural electrodes. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 13, 24–24 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Kruijt, C. C., de Wit, G. C., Talsma, H. E., Schalij-Delfos, N. E. & van Genderen, M. M. The detection of misrouting in albinism: evaluation of different VEP procedures in a heterogeneous cohort. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 60, 3963–3969 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Porciatti, V. & Ventura, L. M. Retinal ganglion cell functional plasticity and optic neuropathy: a comprehensive model. J. Neuroophthalmol. 32, 354–358 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Harwerth, R. S. et al. Visual field defects and neural losses from experimental glaucoma. Prog. Retin Eye Res 21, 91–125 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Boia, R. et al. Neuroprotective strategies for retinal ganglion cell degeneration: current status and challenges ahead. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2262 (2020).

  114. Heo, H. J. et al. Mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase phosphatase 1 regulates the early differentiation of cardiomyocytes from mouse embryonic stem cells. Exp. Mol. Med. 48, e254–e254 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Fox, I. J. et al. Use of differentiated pluripotent stem cells in replacement therapy for treating disease. Science 345, 1247391 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Bedel, A. et al. Preventing pluripotent cell teratoma in regenerative medicine applied to hematology disorders. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 6, 382–393 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Yao, S. Q., Wang, M., Liang, J. J., Ng, T. K. & Cen, L. P. Retinal transcriptome of neonatal mice after optic nerve injury. PLoS One 18, e0286344 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Wang, H. et al. Organization of a functional glycolytic metabolon on mitochondria for metabolic efficiency. Nat. Metab. 6, 1712–1735 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Wei, Y. et al. Aerobic glycolysis is the predominant means of glucose metabolism in neuronal somata, which protects against oxidative damage. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 2081–2089 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Lunt, S. Y. & Vander Heiden, M. G. Aerobic glycolysis: meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Annu Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 441–464 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  121. Rangaraju, V., Calloway, N. & Ryan, T. A. Activity-driven local ATP synthesis is required for synaptic function. Cell 156, 825–835 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  122. Vlassenko, A. G. & Raichle, M. E. Brain aerobic glycolysis functions and Alzheimer’s disease. Clin. Transl. Imaging 3, 27–37 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  123. Dienel, G. A. & Cruz, N. F. Aerobic glycolysis during brain activation: adrenergic regulation and influence of norepinephrine on astrocytic metabolism. J. Neurochem. 138, 14–52 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Quistorff, B., Secher, N. H. & Van Lieshout, J. J. Lactate fuels the human brain during exercise. FASEB J. 22, 3443–3449 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  125. Feng, L. et al. Overexpression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor protects large retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve crush in mice. eNeuro 4, ENEURO.0331–0316.2016 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  126. Jiao, X., Peng, Y. & Yang, L. Minocycline protects retinal ganglion cells after optic nerve crush injury in mice by delaying autophagy and upregulating nuclear factor-κB2. Chin. Med. J. 127, 1749–1754 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  127. Zhou, X., Li, G., Zhang, S. & Wu, J. 5-HT1A receptor agonist promotes retinal ganglion cell function by inhibiting OFF-type presynaptic glutamatergic activity in a chronic glaucoma model. Front. Cell Neurosci. 13, 167 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  128. Zhou, X., Zhang, R., Zhang, S., Wu, J. & Sun, X. Activation of 5-HT1A receptors promotes retinal ganglion cell function by inhibiting the cAMP-PKA pathway to modulate presynaptic GABA release in chronic glaucoma. J. Neurosci. 39, 1484–1504 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Wang, Y. et al. Muscle A-kinase anchoring protein-α is an injury-specific signaling scaffold required for neurotrophic- and cyclic adenosine monophosphate-mediated survival. EBioMedicine 2, 1880–1887 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  130. Chen, V. C. et al. Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on glaucoma: a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One 12, e0173005 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  131. Calkins, D. J. Adaptive responses to neurodegenerative stress in glaucoma. Prog. Retin Eye Res. 84, 100953 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  132. Osborne, N. N. et al. 5-Hydroxytryptamine1A agonists: potential use in glaucoma. Evidence from animal studies. Eye 14, 454–463 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  133. Jöe, M. & Williams, P. A. Targeting Wallerian degeneration in glaucoma. Neural Regen. Res. 21, 693–694 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Crish, S. D. & Calkins, D. J. Neurodegeneration in glaucoma: progression and calcium-dependent intracellular mechanisms. Neuroscience 176, 1–11 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  135. Gerdts, J., Brace, E. J., Sasaki, Y., DiAntonio, A. & Milbrandt, J. SARM1 activation triggers axon degeneration locally via NAD⁺ destruction. Science 348, 453–457 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  136. Inman, D. M. & Harun-Or-Rashid, M. Metabolic vulnerability in the neurodegenerative disease glaucoma. Front Neurosci. 11, 146 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  137. Guo, X. et al. Preservation of vision after CaMKII-mediated protection of retinal ganglion cells. Cell 184, 4299–4314.e4212 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  138. Ross, A. G. et al. Rescue of retinal ganglion cells in optic nerve injury using cell-selective AAV mediated delivery of SIRT1. Gene Ther. 28, 256–264 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  139. Zuo, L. et al. SIRT1 promotes RGC survival and delays loss of function following optic nerve crush. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 54, 5097–5102 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  140. Xie, L., Yin, Y. & Benowitz, L. Chemokine CCL5 promotes robust optic nerve regeneration and mediates many of the effects of CNTF gene therapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2017282118 (2021).

  141. Zarei, K. et al. Automated axon counting in rodent optic nerve sections with axonJ. Sci. Rep. 6, 26559 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  142. Cone, F. E. et al. The effects of anesthesia, mouse strain and age on intraocular pressure and an improved murine model of experimental glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 99, 27–35 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Hypoxia Core Facility at the Indiana University Cooperative Center for Excellence in Hematology (U54 DK106846) for Seahorse support, and Dr. Donald J. Zack for insightful feedback. Transmission-electron microscopy was performed with Derrick Gray, Dr. Quyen Q. Hoang, and Yangshin Park at the Indiana University School of Medicine (IUSM) Electron Microscopy Core; MRI sample preparation and imaging was assisted by Dr. Yu-Chien Wu and Erin E. Jarvis at the IU in vivo imaging core. We are thankful to Andi R. Masters and Christine M. Bach at the Clinical Pharmacology Analytical Core (CPAC, IUSM) for mass-spectrometry analyses, and to Drew M. Brown (Histology Core, IUSM) for tissue sectioning and H&E staining. We acknowledge Drs. Neha Mahajan, Qianyi Luo, and Ashay D. Bhatwadekar for OKR and ERG recordings; Drs. Amir R. Hajrasouliha and Sunland Gong for PhNR measurements; and Drs. Padmanabhan Pattabiraman and Avinash Soundararajan for IOP monitoring and anesthesia. Guidance in cryosectioning and staining was provided by Drs. Yoshikazu Imanishi, Sanae Imanishi, and Shimpei Takita; Dr. Weiming Mao for the access to his light-microscope; and Dr. Timothy W. Corson, Dr. Anbukkarasi Muniyandi, and Kamakshi Sishtla assisted with cell cycle analysis, enucleation and retinal dissection procedures. We thank Dr. Erica Cai (Indiana Biosciences Research Institute) for antisense-oligonucleotide (ASO) design, and Dr. Alyssa Coyne (Johns Hopkins University) for guidance on gymnotic ASO delivery. Drs. Thomas V. Johnson III and Erika A. Aguzzi (Johns Hopkins University) trained us optic-nerve crush and retinal flat-mount techniques; Dr. Harry A. Quigley and Elizabeth Kimball (Johns Hopkins University) assisted with the microbead glaucoma model. We thank Dr. Larry Benowitz and Dr. Yuqin Yin (Harvard Medical School) for providing the GAP-43 antibody, immunohistochemistry and image quantification protocols, and for reviewing GAP-43 positive optic nerve images. Funding was provided by the NIH (R00 EY028223 to A.D.; UL1 TR002529 to S.D. and A.D., R01 NS125020 to N.W.); Research to Prevent Blindness Challenge Grant to IU Ophthalmology, Indiana CTSI, The Glaucoma Foundation, Showalter Research Trust, Indiana University School of Medicine, and the BrightFocus Foundation (RReSTORe collaborative grant) to A. D. K.A. was supported in part by the Paul and Carole Stark Fellowship and a Sigma Xi Grant-in-Aid of Research. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Sayanta Dutta, Michelle L. Surma, Kavitha Anbarasu & Arupratan Das

  2. Advanced Imaging Research Center, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Jie Chen & Nian Wang

  3. Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Kavitha Anbarasu & Arupratan Das

  4. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Jingwei Meng & Arupratan Das

  5. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Nian Wang

  6. Peter O’Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA

    Nian Wang

  7. Stark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA

    Arupratan Das

Authors
  1. Sayanta Dutta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michelle L. Surma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jie Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kavitha Anbarasu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jingwei Meng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nian Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Arupratan Das
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.D. conceived the study and supervised all aspects of the project. A.D., S.D., M.S., and K.A. designed the experiments, carried out the research, and analyzed the data. J.M. designed and executed the small-molecule screen. N.W. and J.C. processed, analyzed, and interpreted the MRI data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arupratan Das.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests. A.D. is an inventor on a patent application (PCT/US2024/044204) currently under review by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, filed through Indiana University School of Medicine.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Medicine thanks Makoto Ishikawa, Richard Libby and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary files (download DOCX )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 2 (download XLSX )

Video S1 (download MOV )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dutta, S., Surma, M.L., Chen, J. et al. The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 maleate promotes retinal ganglion cell differentiation and protects the retino-visual circuits. Commun Med (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01528-3

Download citation

  • Received: 06 July 2025

  • Accepted: 05 March 2026

  • Published: 02 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01528-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact
  • Conferences
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Posters
  • Editorial policies

Publish with us

  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Medicine (Commun Med)

ISSN 2730-664X (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research