Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
TAS3351 is a brain penetrable EGFR-TKI that overcomes T790M and C797S resistant mutations
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 25 March 2026

TAS3351 is a brain penetrable EGFR-TKI that overcomes T790M and C797S resistant mutations

  • Hidefumi Kasuga  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0000-1859-78431,
  • Yuki Kataoka  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-654X1,
  • Fuyuki Yamamoto  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0008-0067-18201,
  • Rei Miyamoto1,
  • Shingo Tsuji1,
  • Tatsuya Suzuki1 &
  • …
  • Shinji Mizuarai1 

Communications Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1559 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Drug development
  • Pharmacology

Abstract

Background

Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), particularly exon 19 deletions and L858R mutation, are frequently observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and confer sensitivity to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Among these EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib is currently the standard of care for patients with NSCLC harboring the activating mutations. However, resistant mutations often arise, leading to resistance to osimertinib. The resistant mutation that most frequently occurs in EGFR during osimertinib treatment is the C797S mutation. Another major resistant mutation arising in EGFR during treatment with other EGFR-TKIs, such as gefitinib and afatinib, is the T790M mutation. Currently, no approved EGFR-TKIs are effective in patients who simultaneously develop the T790M and C797S mutations. Additionally, brain metastasis often causes disease progression due to reduced drug penetration into the brain.

Methods

We conducted preclinical evaluations of TAS3351, a fourth-generation EGFR-TKI, including biochemical, structural, and in vitro/in vivo pharmacological assays. We also evaluated the efflux transporter susceptibility and brain penetrability of TAS3351 in male mice.

Results

Here, we demonstrate that TAS3351 overcomes resistance due to T790M and C797S mutations while sparing wild-type EGFR activity. Furthermore, TAS3351 is not a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and the breast cancer-resistant protein (BCRP) and exhibits significant brain penetrability, resulting in anti-tumor efficacy in mice with intracranial allografts.

Conclusions

These findings indicate that TAS3351 is a promising therapeutic candidate for patients with NSCLC whose tumors have relapsed or are refractory to treatment due to the C797S and T790M mutations, and the brain metastases.

Plain language summary

Changes in a protein called the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are known to play a crucial role in the development of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Many drugs target EGFR, and these are called EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Whilst they are often effective as a treatment for NSCLC initially, often the cancers develop resistance, which means that they stop responding to the treatment. Also, cancer often occurs in the brain, because many cancer drugs cannot reach the brain due to a barrier in blood transfer to the brain. Here we describe a EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor that works against some of the cancers resistant to other EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and also can reach the brain effectively. These data suggest our drug, called TAS3351, has potential as an improved treatment option for patients with NSCLC.

Similar content being viewed by others

The ratio of T790M to EGFR-activating mutation predicts response of osimertinib in 1st or 2nd generation EGFR-TKI-refractory NSCLC

Article Open access 05 May 2021

Brain metastasis, EGFR mutation subtype and generation of EGFR-TKI jointly influence the treatment outcome of patient with EGFR-mutant NSCLC

Article Open access 21 November 2023

Preclinical assessment of combination therapy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a highly heterogeneous tumor model

Article Open access 19 March 2022

Data availability

The crystallographic data generated in this study have been deposited in Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB) with the accession codes (9KL4 and 9KLW). The crystallographic data and refinement statistics are available in the Supplementary Information file as Supplementary Tables 1 and 2. The coordinate Crystallographic Information Files for 9KL4 and 9KLW are found in Supplementary Data 1 and 3, respectively. The structure-factor Crystallographic Information Files for 9KL4 and 9KLW are found in Supplementary Data 2 and 4, respectively. All numerical results underlying the graphs and table presented in this study are available in Supplementary Data 5–8. The uncropped immunoblotting data with molecular markers for Figs. 6a, b are available in the Supplementary Information file as Supplementary Fig. 6 and 7, respectively. All additional relevant data and information in this study are available from corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Lynch, T. J. et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N. Engl. J. Med. 350, 2129–2139 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Paez, J. G. et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 304, 1497–1500 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pao, W. et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from ‘never smokers’ and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13306–13311 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shigematsu, H. et al. Clinical and biological features associated with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 97, 339–346 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dearden, S., Stevens, J., Wu, Y. L. & Blowers, D. Mutation incidence and coincidence in non small-cell lung cancer: meta-analyses by ethnicity and histology (mutMap). Ann. Oncol. 24, 2371–2376 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shi, Y. et al. A prospective, molecular epidemiology study of EGFR mutations in Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology (PIONEER). J. Thorac. Oncol. 9, 154–162 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Midha, A., Dearden, S. & McCormack, R. EGFR mutation incidence in non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology: a systematic review and global map by ethnicity (MutMapII). Am. J. Cancer Res. 5, 2892–2911 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maemondo, M. et al. Gefitinib or chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with mutated EGFR. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 2380–2388 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosell, R. et al. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 13, 239–246 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Park, K. et al. Afatinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (LUX-Lung 7): a phase 2B, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 17, 577–589 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, Y.-L. et al. Dacomitinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment for patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ARCHER 1050): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 18, 1454–1466 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ramalingam, S. S. et al. Overall survival with osimertinib in untreated, EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 41–50 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sequist, L. V. et al. Genotypic and histological evolution of lung cancers acquiring resistance to EGFR inhibitors. Sci. Transl. Med. 3, 75ra26 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kobayashi, S. et al. EGFR mutation and resistance of non–small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 786–792 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yun, C.-H. et al. The T790M mutation in EGFR kinase causes drug resistance by increasing the affinity for ATP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2070–2075 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cross, D. A. E. et al. AZD9291, an irreversible EGFR TKI, overcomes T790M-mediated resistance to EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 4, 1046–1061 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jänne, P. A. et al. AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 372, 1689–1699 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Soria, J.-C. et al. Osimertinib in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 378, 113–125 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thress, K. S. et al. Acquired EGFR C797S mutation mediates resistance to AZD9291 in non–small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR T790M. Nat. Med. 21, 560–562 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oxnard, G. R. et al. Assessment of resistance mechanisms and clinical implications in patients with EGFR T790M–positive lung cancer and acquired resistance to osimertinib. JAMA Oncol. 4, 1527 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schmid, S., Li, J. J. N. & Leighl, N. B. Mechanisms of osimertinib resistance and emerging treatment options. Lung Cancer 147, 123–129 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Uchibori, K. et al. Brigatinib combined with anti-EGFR antibody overcomes osimertinib resistance in EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 8, 14768 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yang, Z. et al. Investigating novel resistance mechanisms to third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 24, 3097–3107 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jia, Y. et al. Overcoming EGFR(T790M) and EGFR(C797S) resistance with mutant-selective allosteric inhibitors. Nature 534, 129–132 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. To, C. et al. Single and dual targeting of mutant EGFR with an allosteric inhibitor. Cancer Discov. 9, 926–943 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. To, C. et al. An allosteric inhibitor against the therapy-resistant mutant forms of EGFR in non-small cell lung cancer. Nat. Cancer 3, 402–417 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Izumi, H. et al. 997P Phase I study of brigatinib plus panitumumab in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer resistant to osimertinib (BEBOP): early termination due to severe early onset pneumonitis by brigatinib. Ann. Oncol. 33, S1009–S1010 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eno, M. S. et al. Discovery of BLU-945, a reversible, potent, and wild-type-sparing next-generation EGFR mutant inhibitor for treatment-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Med. Chem. 65, 9662–9677 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Elamin, Y. Y. et al. BLU-945 monotherapy and in combination with osimertinib (OSI) in previously treated patients with advanced EGFR -mutant (EGFRm) NSCLC in the phase 1/2 SYMPHONY study. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, 9011–9011 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nayak, L., Lee, E. Q. & Wen, P. Y. Epidemiology of brain metastases. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 14, 48–54 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Planchard, D. et al. Osimertinib with or without chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N. Engl. J. Med. 389, 1935–1948 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ballard, P. et al. Preclinical comparison of osimertinib with other EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC brain metastases models, and early evidence of clinical brain metastases activity. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 5130–5140 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ito, K. et al. TAS-121, a selective mutant EGFR inhibitor, shows activity against tumors expressing various EGFR mutations, including T790M and uncommon mutations G719X. Mol. Cancer Ther. 18, 920–928 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hasako, S. et al. TAS6417, a novel EGFR inhibitor targeting exon 20 insertion mutations. Mol. Cancer Ther. 17, 1648–1658 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yung-Chi, C. & Prusoff, W. H. Relationship between the inhibition constant (KI) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem. Pharmacol. 22, 3099–3108 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhai, X., Ward, R. A., Doig, P. & Argyrou, A. Insight into the therapeutic selectivity of the irreversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib through enzyme kinetic studies. Biochemistry 59, 1428–1441 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schwartz, P. A. et al. Covalent EGFR inhibitor analysis reveals importance of reversible interactions to potency and mechanisms of drug resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 173–178 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bell, D. W. et al. Inherited susceptibility to lung cancer may be associated with the T790M drug resistance mutation in EGFR. Nat. Genet. 37, 1315–1316 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yu, H. A. et al. Germline EGFR T790M mutation found in multiple members of a familial cohort. J. Thorac. Oncol. 9, 554–558 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Morrison, J. F. Kinetics of the reversible inhibition of enzyme-catalysed reactions by tight-binding inhibitors. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 185, 269–286 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kuzmic, P., Hill, C., Kirtley, M. P. & Janc, J. W. Kinetic determination of tight-binding impurities in enzyme inhibitors. Anal. Biochem. 319, 272–279 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Murphy, D. J. Determination of accurate KI values for tight-binding enzyme inhibitors: an in silico study of experimental error and assay design. Anal. Biochem. 327, 61–67 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Moyer, J. D. et al. Induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest by CP-358,774, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase. Cancer Res. 57, 4838–4848 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Aguilar, H. N., Zielnik, B., Tracey, C. N. & Mitchell, B. F. Quantification of rapid myosin regulatory light chain phosphorylation using high-throughput in-cell western assays: comparison to western immunoblots. PLoS ONE 5, e9965 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li, D. et al. BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models. Oncogene 27, 4702–4711 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Engelman, J. A. et al. PF00299804, an irreversible pan-ERBB inhibitor, is effective in lung cancer models with EGFR and ERBB2 mutations that are resistant to gefitinib. Cancer Res. 67, 11924–11932 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ellis, P. M. et al. Dacomitinib compared with placebo in pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NCIC CTG BR.26): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 15, 1379–1388 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Miller, V. A. et al. Afatinib versus placebo for patients with advanced, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of erlotinib, gefitinib, or both, and one or two lines of chemotherapy (LUX-Lung 1): a phase 2b/3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 13, 528–538 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jiang, J. et al. Epidermal growth factor–independent transformation of Ba/F3 cells with cancer-derived epidermal growth factor receptor mutants induces gefitinib-sensitive cell cycle progression. Cancer Res. 65, 8968–8974 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Godin-Heymann, N. et al. Oncogenic activity of epidermal growth factor receptor kinase mutant alleles is enhanced by the T790M drug resistance mutation. Cancer Res. 67, 7319–7326 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Merlino, G. T. et al. Amplification and enhanced expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in A431 human carcinoma cells. Science 224, 417–419 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Pardridge, W. M. Drug transport across the blood-brain barrier. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 32, 1959–1972 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Brouwer, K. L. R. et al. In vitro methods to support transporter evaluation in drug discovery and development. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 94, 95–112 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  54. International Transporter Consortium Giacomini, K. M. et al. Membrane transporters in drug development. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov 9, 215–236 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Loryan, I. et al. Unbound brain-to-plasma partition coefficient, Kp,uu,brain-a game changing parameter for CNS drug discovery and development. Pharm. Res. 39, 1321–1341 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Zou, L. et al. Considerations in Kp,uu,brain-based strategy for selecting CNS-targeted drug candidates with sufficient target coverage and substantial pharmacodynamic effect. AAPS J. 27, 52 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wu, Y.-L. et al. Osimertinib in resected EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 1711–1723 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Chmielecki, J. et al. Candidate mechanisms of acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib in EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 14, 1070 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Osoegawa, A. et al. High incidence of C797S mutation in patients with long treatment history of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors including osimertinib. JTO Clin. Res. Rep. 2, 100191 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Starrett, J. H. et al. Drug sensitivity and allele specificity of first-line osimertinib resistance EGFR mutations. Cancer Res. 80, 2017–2030 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Jänne, P. A. et al. CNS efficacy of osimertinib with or without chemotherapy in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 42, 808–820 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Yun, J. et al. Antitumor activity of amivantamab (JNJ-61186372), an EGFR–MET bispecific antibody, in diverse models of EGFR exon 20 insertion–driven NSCLC. Cancer Discov. 10, 1194–1209 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cho, B. C. et al. A phase 1/2 study of lazertinib 240 mg in patients with advanced EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC after previous EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. J. Thorac. Oncol. 17, 558–567 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Ahn, M.-J. et al. Lazertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the dose escalation and dose expansion parts of a first-in-human, open-label, multicentre, phase 1-2 study. Lancet Oncol. 20, 1681–1690 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Cho, B. C. et al. Amivantamab plus lazertinib in previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N. Engl. J. Med. 391, 1486–1498 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Park, S. et al. EGFR C797S as a resistance mechanism of lazertinib in non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR T790M mutation. Cancer Res. Treat. 52, 1288–1290 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Jänne, P. A. et al. Efficacy and safety of patritumab deruxtecan (HER3-DXd) in EGFR inhibitor–resistant, EGFR -mutated non–small cell lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 12, 74–89 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Colclough, N. et al. Preclinical comparison of the blood-brain barrier permeability of osimertinib with other EGFR TKIs. Clin. Cancer Res. 27, 189–201 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Dardenne, E. et al. Abstract 1229: BDTX-1535: a MasterKey EGFR inhibitor targeting classical and non-classical oncogenic driver mutations and the C797S acquired resistance mutation to address the evolving molecular landscape of EGFR mutant NSCLC. Cancer Res. 84, 1229–1229 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Drs. Teruhiro Utsugi, Takeshi Sagara, Yoshikazu Iwasawa, Kazuhiko Yonekura, and Kazutaka Miyadera for mentoring this work. We would also like to thank all those who contributed to this work at the Discovery and Preclinical Research Division of Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. We also thank the MD Anderson Cancer Center for their invaluable support in conducting this research. PC-9 and Ba/F3 cells were provided by the RIKEN BRC through the National Bio-Resource Project of the MEXT, Japan. This study was funded by Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Discovery and Preclinical Research Division, Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tsukuba, Japan

    Hidefumi Kasuga, Yuki Kataoka, Fuyuki Yamamoto, Rei Miyamoto, Shingo Tsuji, Tatsuya Suzuki & Shinji Mizuarai

Authors
  1. Hidefumi Kasuga
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuki Kataoka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fuyuki Yamamoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rei Miyamoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shingo Tsuji
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tatsuya Suzuki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Shinji Mizuarai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.K., F.Y., and S.M. conceived, designed, and supervised the entire experiment. H.K., F.Y., Y.K., F.Y., S.T., R.M., and T.S. implemented experiments, acquired data, and all authors participated in data interpretation. H.K. wrote the manuscript, and all authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hidefumi Kasuga.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

All authors are employees of Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Otsuka Holdings Co., Ltd.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Medicine thanks Yi-Chen Zhang and Kimio Yonesaka for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download DOCX )

Supplementary Data 1

Supplementary Data 2

Supplementary Data 3

Supplementary Data 4

Supplementary Data 5 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 6 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 7 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 8 (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasuga, H., Kataoka, Y., Yamamoto, F. et al. TAS3351 is a brain penetrable EGFR-TKI that overcomes T790M and C797S resistant mutations. Commun Med (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01546-1

Download citation

  • Received: 13 May 2025

  • Accepted: 11 March 2026

  • Published: 25 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01546-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact
  • Conferences
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Posters
  • Editorial policies

Publish with us

  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Medicine (Commun Med)

ISSN 2730-664X (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research