Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Electrochemically initiated synthesis of ethylene carbonate from CO2

Abstract

Electrochemical methods have emerged as crucial strategies in the pursuit of achieving net-zero emissions, addressing key objectives such as hydrogen production, CO2 capture and CO2 conversion. Here we propose an electrochemically initiated process that integrates these three tasks while producing valuable industrial chemicals, such as hydrogen, ethylene carbonate and urethane polymers. In this approach, CO2, ethylene and water are transformed into ethylene carbonate and hydrogen, and the key to enabling this transformation is the discovery that CO2, captured as sodium bicarbonate, can be utilized in organic carbonate synthesis in an aqueous solution. Importantly, this transformation is mediated by succinimide, an organic catalyst that interacts with protons, bromine and CO2 throughout this process. Technoeconomic analysis and life-cycle assessment of a commercial-scale process based on our proposed reaction pathway reveals its profitability and environmental viability. In the future, this approach could be generalized for the synthesis of various organic carbonates, with implications for producing lithium battery electrolytes, carbonate polymers and non-isocyanate urethane polymers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Integration of electrochemical hydrogen production, CO2 capture and CO2 utilization.
Fig. 2: Investigation of the role of succinimide derivatives.
Fig. 3: Investigation of ethylene carbonate conversion to BHUs and then to urethane polymers.
Fig. 4: Investigation of the substrate scope for RX5.
Fig. 5: Technoeconomic analysis and LCA of bishydroxyurethane production.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information. Additional data related to this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. UNFCCC, Glasgow Climate Pact, Decision -/CP.26, advance unedited version (2021); https://unfccc.int/documents/310475

  2. Lee, M. et al. Current achievements and the future direction of electrochemical CO2 reduction: a short review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 769–815 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nitopi, S. et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119, 7610–7672 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jin, S. et al. Low energy carbon capture via electrochemically induced pH swing with electrochemical rebalancing. Nat. Commun. 13, 2140 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu, P. et al. Continuous carbon capture in an electrochemical solid-electrolyte reactor. Nature 618, 959–966 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, C. et al. Highly efficient CO2 utilization via aqueous zinc– or aluminum–CO2 systems for hydrogen gas evolution and electricity production. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 131, 9606–9611 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sullivan, I. et al. Coupling electrochemical CO2 conversion with CO2 capture. Nat. Catal. 4, 952–958 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gutiérrez-Sánchez, O. et al. A state‐of‐the‐art update on integrated CO2 capture and electrochemical conversion systems. ChemElectroChem 9, e202101540 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, K. M. et al. Redox-neutral electrochemical conversion of CO2 to dimethyl carbonate. Nat. Energy 6, 733–741 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gu, X. et al. Simulation and assessment of manufacturing ethylene carbonate from ethylene oxide in multiple process routes. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 3, 135–144 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fukuoka, S. et al. A novel non-phosgene process for polycarbonate production from CO2: green and sustainable chemistry in practice. Catal. Surv. Asia 14, 146–163 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandes, D. et al. Investigations of primary and secondary amine carbamate stability by 1H NMR spectroscopy for post combustion capture of carbon dioxide. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 54, 183–191 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohite, A. R. et al. Thiourea-mediated halogenation of alcohols. J. Org. Chem. 85, 12901–12911 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Adimurthy, S. et al. Eco-friendly and versatile brominating reagent prepared from a liquid bromine precursor. Green Chem. 8, 916–922 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McClellan, P. P. Manufacture and uses of ethylene oxide and ethylene glycol. Ind. Eng. Chem. 42, 2402–2407 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leow, W. R. et al. Chloride-mediated selective electrosynthesis of ethylene and propylene oxides at high current density. Science 368, 1228–1233 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schalck, J. et al. The bromine mediated electrosynthesis of ethylene oxide from ethylene in continuous flow-through operation. Chem. Eng. J. 446, 136750 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Deno, N. C. & Fruit, R. E. Jr. The oxidative cleavage of amines by aqueous bromine at 25 deg. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 90, 3502–3506 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Horner, L. & Winkelmann, E. H. N-Bromosuccinimide, its properties and reactions the course of substitution. Newer Methods Prep. Org. Chem. 3, 151–198 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khokarale, S. G. & Mikkola, J. P. Metal free synthesis of ethylene and propylene carbonate from alkylene halohydrin and CO2 at room temperature. RSC Adv. 9, 34023–34031 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lyubimov, S. E. et al. A simple synthesis of ethylene carbonate from carbon dioxide and 2-chloroethanol using silica gel as a catalyst. Appl. Catal. A 592, 117433 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zanatta, M. et al. Direct air capture and integrated conversion of carbon dioxide into cyclic carbonates with basic organic salts. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 11, 9613–9619 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Maisonneuve, L. et al. Isocyanate-free routes to polyurethanes and poly(hydroxy urethane)s. Chem. Rev. 115, 12407–12439 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dros, A. B. et al. Hexamethylenediamine (HMDA) from fossil- vs bio-based routes: an economic and life cycle assessment comparative study. Green Chem. 17, 4760–4772 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saliu, F. & Rindone, B. Organocatalyzed synthesis of ureas from amines and ethylene carbonate. Tetrahedron Lett. 51, 6301–6304 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kočí, V. & Loubal, T. LCA of liquid epoxy resin produced based on propylene and on glycerin. Acta Environ. Universitatis Comenianae 20, 62–67 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Scodeller, I. et al. Synthesis of renewable meta‐xylylenediamine from biomass‐derived furfural. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 10510–10514 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nwaoha, C. et al. Process simulation and parametric sensitivity study of CO2 capture from 115 MW coal–fired power plant using MEA–DEA blend. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 76, 1–11 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Langie, K. M. G. et al. Toward economical application of carbon capture and utilization technology with near-zero carbon emission. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–10 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cannavó, F. Sensitivity analysis for volcanic source modeling quality assessment and model selection. Comput. Geosci. 44, 52–59 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment; Principles and Framework (ISO, 2006).

  32. Environmental Management: Life Cycle Assessment; Requirements and Guidelines, ISO 14044 (ISO, 2006).

  33. Monie, F. et al. Chemo‐ and regioselective additions of nucleophiles to cyclic carbonates for the preparation of self‐blowing non‐isocyanate polyurethane foams. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 132, 17181–17189 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Korth, H. G. & Mulder, P. Phenolic hydrogen transfer by molecular oxygen and hydroperoxyl radicals. Insights into the mechanism of the anthraquinone process. J. Org. Chem. 85, 2560–2574 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Seider W. D., Seader J. D., & Lewin D. R., Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis and Evaluation (John Wiley, 2009).

  36. Colella W. G., James B. D., & Moton J. M., Hydrogen Pathways Analysis for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) Electrolysis (Strategic Analysis, 2014).

  37. Huang, Z., Grim, R. G., Schaidle, J. A. & Tao, L. The economic outlook for converting CO2 and electrons to molecules. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 3664–3678 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Assen, N. V. D., Voll, P., Peters, M. & Bardow, A. Life cycle assessment of CO2 capture and utilization: a tutorial review. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 7982–7994 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Wernet, G. et al. The Ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21, 1218–1230 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Delpierre, M. et al. Assessing the environmental impacts of wind-based hydrogen production in the Netherlands using ex-ante LCA and scenarios analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 299, 126866 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Creative Materials Discovery Program (2017M3D1A1039377) and the DACU Program (RS-2023-00259920) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT), the Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) funded by the Korea Ministry of Environment (2021002800009), the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) (10076899), Development of Electro-chlorination Catalyst and System, and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2022M3C1A3092056). K.T.N. thanks the Institute of Engineering Research, the Research Institute of Advanced Materials (RIAM) and the Soft Foundry at Seoul National University for support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.T.N. and J.H.J. conceived the idea and obtained the initial results. J.H.J., C.K., O.S.N., U.L., M.S.K. and K.T.N. designed the research and wrote the manuscript. J.H.J., J.B.Y. and Y.I.J. conducted experiments for steps RX1–RX4. O.S.N., G.R.K. and J.K. performed the synthesis, functionalization, characterization of BHUs and DFT calculations. C.K. simulated the model process and performed the technoeconomic analysis and the LCA. All authors discussed the experiments and contributed to the writing of the manuscript. U.L. guided the process simulation, the technoeconomic analysis and the LCA. M.S.K. guided the synthesis, functionalization and characterization of BHUs and the DFT calculation. K.T.N. guided all aspects of this work.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ung Lee, Min Sang Kwon or Ki Tae Nam.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Synthesis thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Peter Seavill, in collaboration with the Nature Synthesis team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Experimental details, Supplementary Figs. 1–9 and Tables 1–7.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Source data for Fig. 1.

Source Data Fig. 2

Source data for Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 3

Source data for Fig. 3.

Source Data Fig. 5

Source data for Fig. 5.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jang, J.H., Kim, C., Nayal, O.S. et al. Electrochemically initiated synthesis of ethylene carbonate from CO2. Nat. Synth 3, 846–857 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-024-00543-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-024-00543-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing