Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Ethylene electrosynthesis at low voltages enabled by dopant-induced modulation of the rate-determining step

Abstract

CO2 electrolysis offers an attractive route for the sustainable production of ethylene. However, electrolysis in membrane electrode assembly (MEA) systems using conventional copper electrocatalysts is limited by low current densities and high operating voltages. Here we report a design strategy involving cobalt-based subsurface dopants to construct and stabilize catalytically active sites. In-depth experimental and theoretical investigations revealed that the dopants induce a shift in the rate-determining step for ethylene from CO* coupling to the chemical step: OCCO* + H* → OCCHO* + *. A Tafel slope of 54 mV per decade is observed, which is considerably lower than the value of 124 mV per decade seen for a reference copper catalyst. This enables MEA operation with a low full-cell voltage of 1.89 V at 0.5 A and stable operation for 145 h at 1 A. We showcase record MEA CO2-to-ethylene conversion at a current of 4 A, with a Faradaic efficiency of 70.6% and a full-cell energy efficiency of 25.2%. Techno-economic assessment indicates potential for profitability with a production cost close to the ethylene market price under optimistic conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic showing simplified proposed reaction pathways from CO2 to ethylene.
Fig. 2: Computational studies of PBA-derived copper sites, Cu(100) and Cu(111).
Fig. 3: Materials characterization and CO2R performance of PBA-derived catalysts.
Fig. 4: Cyclic voltammetry and spectroscopy studies of CoCu.
Fig. 5: Isotope studies of CoCu.
Fig. 6: MEA electrolyser system performance for CO2-to-C2H4.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. Should any raw data files be needed in another format, they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Arquer, F. P. G. D. et al. CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products at activities greater than 1 A cm−2. Science 367, 661–666 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Qiao, J., Liu, Y., Hong, F. & Zhang, J. A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 631–675 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stephens, I. E. L. et al. 2022 roadmap on low temperature electrochemical CO2 reduction. J. Phys. Energy 4, 042003 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chu, S., Cui, Y. & Liu, N. The path towards sustainable energy. Nat. Mater. 16, 16–22 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hepburn, C. et al. The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature 575, 87–97 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ross, M. B. et al. Designing materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide recycling. Nat. Catal. 2, 648–658 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clark, E. L. et al. Standards and protocols for data acquisition and reporting for studies of the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. ACS Catal. 8, 6560–6570 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, Y., Liu, J. & Zheng, G. Designing copper-based catalysts for efficient carbon dioxide electroreduction. Adv. Mater. 33, e2005798 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Luna, P. et al. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364, eaav3506 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bushuyev, O. S. et al. What should we make with CO2 and how can we make it? Joule 2, 825–832 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jouny, M., Luc, W. & Jiao, F. General techno-economic analysis of CO2 electrolysis systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57, 2165–2177 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shin, H., Hansen, K. U. & Jiao, F. Techno-economic assessment of low-temperature carbon dioxide electrolysis. Nat. Sustain. 4, 911–919 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Masel, R. I. et al. An industrial perspective on catalysts for low-temperature CO2 electrolysis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 118–128 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weng, L.-C., Bell, A. T. & Weber, A. Z. Towards membrane-electrode assembly systems for CO2 reduction: a modeling study. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 1950–1968 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ge, L. et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction in membrane-electrode assemblies. Chem 8, 663–692 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, Z. et al. Membrane electrode assembly for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction: principle and application. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202302789 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hori, Y. in Modern Aspects of Electrochemistry Vol. 42 (eds Vayenas, C. G. et al.) 89–189 (Springer, 2008).

  18. Fan, L. et al. Strategies in catalysts and electrolyzer design for electrochemical CO2 reduction toward C2+ products. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay3111 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Dinh, C.-T. et al. CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface. Science 360, 783–787 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao, D., Arán-Ais, R. M., Jeon, H. S. & Roldan Cuenya, B. Rational catalyst and electrolyte design for CO2 electroreduction towards multicarbon products. Nat. Catal. 2, 198–210 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao, Z., Zhang, J., Lei, M. & Lum, Y. Reviewing the impact of halides on electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nano Res. Energy 2, e9120044 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nitopi, S. et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119, 7610–7672 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N. & Jaramillo, T. F. New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7050–7059 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, J. et al. Electrokinetic and in situ spectroscopic investigations of CO electrochemical reduction on copper. Nat. Commun. 12, 3264 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim, D., Kley, C. S., Li, Y. & Yang, P. Copper nanoparticle ensembles for selective electroreduction of CO2 to C2–C3 products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10560–10565 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, Z., Zhang, T., Raj, J., Roy, S. & Wu, J. Revisiting reaction kinetics of CO electroreduction to C2+ products in a flow electrolyzer. Energy Fuels 37, 7904–7910 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lu, X., Shinagawa, T. & Takanabe, K. Product distribution control guided by a microkinetic analysis for CO reduction at high-flux electrocatalysis using gas-diffusion Cu electrodes. ACS Catal. 13, 1791–1803 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang, H., Gao, J., Raciti, D. & Hall, A. S. Promoting Cu-catalysed CO2 electroreduction to multicarbon products by tuning the activity of H2O. Nat. Catal. 6, 807–817 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Fletcher, S. Tafel slopes from first principles. J. Solid State Electrochem. 13, 537–549 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wuttig, A. & Surendranath, Y. Impurity ion complexation enhances carbon dioxide reduction catalysis. ACS Catal. 5, 4479–4484 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheng, T., Xiao, H. & Goddard, W. A. 3rd Full atomistic reaction mechanism with kinetics for CO reduction on Cu(100) from ab initio molecular dynamics free-energy calculations at 298 K. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1795–1800 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Garza, A. J., Bell, A. T. & Head-Gordon, M. Mechanism of CO2 reduction at copper surfaces: pathways to C2 products. ACS Catal. 8, 1490–1499 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sandberg, R. B., Montoya, J. H., Chan, K. & Nørskov, J. K. CO–CO coupling on Cu facets: coverage, strain and field effects. Surf. Sci. 654, 56–62 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Yi, H. et al. Structure and properties of Prussian blue analogues in energy storage and conversion applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202006970 (2020).

  35. Peterson, A. A. Global optimization of adsorbate–surface structures while preserving molecular identity. Top. Catal. 57, 40–53 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Birdja, Y. Y. et al. Advances and challenges in understanding the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels. Nat. Energy 4, 732–745 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Peng, H. J., Tang, M. T., Halldin Stenlid, J., Liu, X. & Abild-Pedersen, F. Trends in oxygenate/hydrocarbon selectivity for electrochemical CO2 reduction to C2 products. Nat. Commun. 13, 1399 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Montoya, J. H., Shi, C., Chan, K. & Norskov, J. K. Theoretical insights into a CO dimerization mechanism in CO2 electroreduction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2032–2037 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang, Y. et al. Catalyst synthesis under CO2 electroreduction favours faceting and promotes renewable fuels electrosynthesis. Nat. Catal. 3, 98–106 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sundararaman, R. et al. JDFTx: software for joint density-functional theory. SoftwareX 6, 278–284 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sundararaman, R., Goddard, W. A. III & Arias, T. A. Grand canonical electronic density-functional theory: algorithms and applications to electrochemistry. J. Chem. Phys. 146, 114104 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Aguila, D., Prado, Y., Koumousi, E. S., Mathoniere, C. & Clerac, R. Switchable Fe/Co Prussian blue networks and molecular analogues. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 203–224 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zakaria, M. B. & Chikyow, T. Recent advances in Prussian blue and Prussian blue analogues: synthesis and thermal treatments. Coord. Chem. Rev. 352, 328–345 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, H. et al. On the activity and selectivity of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural electrocatalytic oxidation over cation-defective nickel hydroxides. ACS Catal. 14, 9565–9574 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu, K., Smith, W. A. & Burdyny, T. Introductory guide to assembling and operating gas diffusion electrodes for electrochemical CO2 reduction. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 639–643 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Schouten, K. J. P., Pérez Gallent, E. & Koper, M. T. M. Structure sensitivity of the electrochemical reduction of carbon monoxide on copper single crystals. ACS Catal. 3, 1292–1295 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. De Gregorio, G. L. et al. Facet-dependent selectivity of Cu catalysts in electrochemical CO2 reduction at commercially viable current densities. ACS Catal. 10, 4854–4862 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Lum, Y. & Ager, J. W. Stability of residual oxides in oxide-derived copper catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction investigated with 18O labeling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 551–554 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Mandal, L. et al. Investigating the role of copper oxide in electrochemical CO2 reduction in real time. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 8574–8584 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. An, H. et al. Sub-second time-resolved surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy reveals dynamic CO intermediates during electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 16576–16584 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Wei, P. et al. Coverage-driven selectivity switch from ethylene to acetate in high-rate CO2/CO electrolysis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 299–306 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gameel, K. M., Sharafeldin, I. M., Abourayya, A. U., Biby, A. H. & Allam, N. K. Unveiling CO adsorption on Cu surfaces: new insights from molecular orbital principles. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 25892–25900 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Limaye, A. M., Zeng, J. S., Willard, A. P. & Manthiram, K. Bayesian data analysis reveals no preference for cardinal Tafel slopes in CO2 reduction electrocatalysis. Nat. Commun. 12, 703 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Xiao, H., Cheng, T. & Goddard, W. A. 3rd Atomistic mechanisms underlying selectivities in C1 and C2 products from electrochemical reduction of CO on Cu(111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 130–136 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gao, W., Xu, Y., Fu, L., Chang, X. & Xu, B. Experimental evidence of distinct sites for CO2-to-CO and CO conversion on Cu in the electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction. Nat. Catal. 6, 885–894 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Lum, Y. & Ager, J. W. Evidence for product-specific active sites on oxide-derived Cu catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Catal. 2, 86–93 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Fang, W. et al. Durable CO2 conversion in the proton-exchange membrane system. Nature 626, 86–91 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hao, S. et al. Improving the operational stability of electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction via salt precipitation understanding and management. Nat. Energy 10, 266–277 (2025).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Overa, S. et al. Enhancing acetate selectivity by coupling anodic oxidation to carbon monoxide electroreduction. Nat. Catal. 5, 738–745 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Ling, N. et al. Acidic media impedes tandem catalysis reaction pathways in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202308782 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Chen, J., Jia, M., Hu, P. & Wang, H. CATKINAS: a large-scale catalytic microkinetic analysis software for mechanism auto-analysis and catalyst screening. J. Comput. Chem. 42, 379–391 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen, J.-F., Mao, Y., Wang, H.-F. & Hu, P. Reversibility iteration method for understanding reaction networks and for solving microkinetics in heterogeneous catalysis. ACS Catal. 6, 7078–7087 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Chen, J., Jia, M., Lai, Z., Hu, P. & Wang, H. SSIA: a sensitivity-supervised interlock algorithm for high-performance microkinetic solving. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 024108 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Yue, K. et al. Stabilized Cu0–Cu1+ dual sites in a cyanamide framework for selective CO2 electroreduction to ethylene. Nat. Commun. 15, 7820 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Fang, M. et al. Anionic ionomer: released surface-immobilized cations and an established hydrophobic microenvironment for efficient and durable CO2-to-ethylene electrosynthesis at high current over one month. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 27060–27069 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Li, F. et al. Molecular tuning of CO2-to-ethylene conversion. Nature 577, 509–513 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Li, W. et al. Bifunctional ionomers for efficient co-electrolysis of CO2 and pure water towards ethylene production at industrial-scale current densities. Nat. Energy 7, 835–843 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Liu, W. et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction to ethylene by ultrathin CuO nanoplate arrays. Nat. Commun. 13, 1877 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank B. Johannessen and acknowledge the use of the Australian Synchrotron Facility at the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) for collection of the in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) data used in this work. We also acknowledge the use of the X-ray Absorption Fine structure for catalysis (XAFCA) beamline of the Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS) for collection of the ex situ and in situ XAS data used in this work. In situ XAS, including X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS), was also performed in fluorescence mode in an in situ photocatalytic cell using a silicon drift detector at the BL32A beamline of TPS, National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC), Taiwan. We thank W. Nie and C. Hu for useful advice on Raman spectra analysis. Y.L. acknowledges support and funding from the A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research) under its LCER FI programme (award number U2102d2002) and an NRF Fellowship (award number NRF-NRFF14-2022-0003). This research is supported by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore, under its Campus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE) programme (Development of Advanced Catalysts for Electrochemical Carbon Abatement, project code 370184872). The computational study is supported by the Marsden Fund Council from government funding (21-UOA-237) and Catalyst: Seeding General Grant (24-UOA-048-CSG), managed by Royal Society Te Apārangi. All DFT calculations were carried out on the New Zealand eScience Infrastructure (NeSI) high-performance computing facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.L. and Z.W. supervised the project. Y.L. and Q.Y. conceived the idea and designed the experiments. Q.Y. carried out the experimental work. X.W. and Y.M. performed the computational work. J.Z. carried out the isotope experiments and analysis. Y.Z., S.X., Y.-C.L., Y.-H.H. and S.-F.H. carried out the XAS experiments. L.Z. performed the high-resolution STEM. S.B.D. carried out the X-ray diffraction measurements. M.W. prepared the Cu/PTFE and Cu/CP catalysts. B.W. prepared the IrOx-coated titanium mesh electrodes. M.Z. carried out the XPS measurements. W.R.L. contributed to data analysis and manuscript editing. Q.Y., X.W., Z.W. and Y.L. co-wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and assisted with the manuscript preparation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ziyun Wang or Yanwei Lum.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Q.Y. and Y.L. are co-inventors on a patent application ‘Method of converting carbon dioxide to a multi-carbon compound’, PCT/SG2024/050727. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Synthesis thanks William Goddard III, Jingshan Luo and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Peter Seavill, in collaboration with the Nature Synthesis team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Figs. 1–86, Tables 1–38 and Notes 1–3.

Supplementary Data 1 (download PDF )

Atomic coordinates of the optimized computational models.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2 (download XLSX )

Figure2_SourceData (excel).

Source Data Fig. 3 (download XLSX )

Figure3_SourceData (excel).

Source Data Fig. 4 (download XLSX )

Figure4_SourceData (excel).

Source Data Fig. 5 (download XLSX )

Figure5_SourceData (excel).

Source Data Fig. 6 (download XLSX )

Figure6_SourceData (excel).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Q., Wang, X., Zhang, J. et al. Ethylene electrosynthesis at low voltages enabled by dopant-induced modulation of the rate-determining step. Nat. Synth 4, 1396–1407 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-025-00850-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-025-00850-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing