Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Electrosynthesis of ethanol via CO–CHx cross-coupling on copper alloy catalysts with engineered oxygen affinity

Subjects

Abstract

Electroreduction of CO2 or CO can produce renewable ethanol—a valuable industrial chemical. However, the limited energy and carbon efficiencies of reported systems present practical challenges. Here we introduce p-block elements into copper catalysts, enabling electrosynthesis of ethanol from CO for 200 h and delivering a full-cell energy efficiency of 22% and a carbon efficiency of 50%, seven-fold better than state-of-the-art. Density functional theory calculations indicate that the lead-doped copper catalyst enhances the cleavage of C–O bonds in *OCHx molecules formed during CO hydrogenation. This enhances the cross-coupling reaction between *CO and *CHx species favouring ethanol production, as opposed to the conventional *CO dimerization pathway that primarily yields ethylene. Using a set of in situ spectroscopic techniques, we show that the addition of lead to copper catalysts expedites the generation of *OCHx species and increases the coverage of *CHx species, thereby enhancing their coupling with *CO and improving ethanol production, in agreement with our theoretical predictions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic illustration of electrocatalyst design for CO-to-ethanol conversion.
Fig. 2: DFT calculations on the ethanol pathways on Cu–Pb from CO reduction.
Fig. 3: Characterization of the Cu–Pb electrocatalyst at a Pb:Cu ratio of 0.05.
Fig. 4: Mechanistic investigations of the Cu–Pb and pristine copper catalysts for CO-to-ethanol conversion.
Fig. 5: Electrocatalytic performance of different copper catalysts in a MEA electrolyser during CO electrolysis.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analysed and generated during the current study are included in the paper and its Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Ethanol Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis, by Type (Synthetic and Biobased), by Application (Fuel, Industrial Solvent, Food & Beverages, Chemicals, and Others), and Regional Forecast, 2023–2030 (Fortune Business Insights, 2024).

  2. Fry, M. et al. Capturing and Utilizing CO2 from Ethanol: Adding Economic Value and Jobs to Rural Economies and Communities While Reducing Emissions (State CO2-EOR Deployment Work Group, 2017).

  3. Chen, C. et al. Highly efficient electroreduction of CO2 to C2+ alcohols on heterogeneous dual active sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 132, 16601–16606 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, F. et al. Cooperative CO2-to-ethanol conversion via enriched intermediates at molecule–metal catalyst interfaces. Nat. Catal. 3, 75–82 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, X. et al. Efficient electrically powered CO2-to-ethanol via suppression of deoxygenation. Nat. Energy 5, 478–486 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gu, Z. et al. Efficient electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to C2+ alcohols at defect-site-rich Cu surface. Joule 5, 429–440 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang, J. E. et al. CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products in strong acid. Science 372, 1074–1078 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crandall, B. S. et al. Kilowatt-scale tandem CO2 electrolysis for enhanced acetate and ethylene production. Nat. Chem. Eng. 1, 421–429 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jouny, M., Hutchings, G. S. & Jiao, F. Carbon monoxide electroreduction as an emerging platform for carbon utilization. Nat. Catal. 2, 1062–1070 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozden, A. et al. Energy-and carbon-efficient CO2/CO electrolysis to multicarbon products via asymmetric ion migration–adsorption. Nat. Energy 8, 179–190 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozden, A. et al. Cascade CO2 electroreduction enables efficient carbonate-free production of ethylene. Joule 5, 706–719 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, C. et al. Exploration of the bio-analogous asymmetric C–C coupling mechanism in tandem CO2 electroreduction. Nat. Catal. 5, 878–887 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. da Silva, A. H. M., Karaiskakis, G., Vos, R. E. & Koper, M. T. M. Mechanistic insights into the formation of hydroxyacetone, acetone, and 1, 2-propanediol from electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 15343–15352 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, J. et al. Intercepting elusive intermediates in Cu-mediated CO electrochemical reduction with alkyl species. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 20495–20506 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren, D. et al. Atomic layer deposition of ZnO on CuO enables selective and efficient electroreduction of carbon dioxide to liquid fuels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 15036–15040 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Iyengar, P., Kolb, M. J., Pankhurst, J. R., Calle-Vallejo, F. & Buonsanti, R. Elucidating the facet-dependent selectivity for CO2 electroreduction to ethanol of Cu–Ag tandem catalysts. ACS Catal. 11, 4456–4463 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong, S. et al. Delocalization state-induced selective bond breaking for efficient methanol electrosynthesis from CO2. Nat. Catal. 6, 6–15 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, Z. et al. Switching CO2 electroreduction toward ethanol by delocalization state-tuned bond cleavage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 14260–14266 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yan, T. et al. Multiscale CO2 electrocatalysis to C2+ products: reaction mechanisms, catalyst design, and device fabrication. Chem. Rev. 123, 10530–10583 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, J. et al. Constraining CO coverage on copper promotes high-efficiency ethylene electroproduction. Nat. Catal. 2, 1124–1131 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng, T. et al. Copper-catalysed exclusive CO2 to pure formic acid conversion via single-atom alloying. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1386–1393 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vasileff, A., Xu, C., Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y. & Qiao, S.-Z. Surface and interface engineering in copper-based bimetallic materials for selective CO2 electroreduction. Chem 4, 1809–1831 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tröger, L. et al. Full correction of the self-absorption in soft-fluorescence extended X-ray-absorption fine structure. Phys. Rev. B 46, 3283 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shao, F. et al. In situ spectroelectrochemical probing of CO redox landscape on copper single-crystal surfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2118166119 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Long, C. et al. Regulating reconstruction of oxide-derived Cu for electrochemical CO2 reduction toward n-propanol. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi6119 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Wen, Y. et al. Introducing Brønsted acid sites to accelerate the bridging-oxygen-assisted deprotonation in acidic water oxidation. Nat. Commun. 13, 4871 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, N. et al. Dynamical evolution of CO2 and H2O on garnet electrolyte elucidated by ambient pressure X-ray spectroscopies. Nat. Commun. 15, 2777 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Palomino, R. M. et al. Interfaces in heterogeneous catalytic reactions: ambient pressure XPS as a tool to unravel surface chemistry. J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 221, 28–43 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Leclerc, M., Etxebarria, A., Ye, Y., Crumlin, E. J. & Brisard, G. M. An APXPS probe of Cu/Pd bimetallic catalyst surface chemistry of CO2 toward co in the presence of H2O and H2. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 17085–17094 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ferrah, D. et al. Wet chemical growth and thermocatalytic activity of Cu-based nanoparticles supported on TiO2 nanoparticles/HOPG: in situ ambient pressure XPS study of the CO2 hydrogenation reaction. ACS Catal. 9, 6783–6802 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gengenbach, T. R., Major, G. H., Linford, M. R. & Easton, C. D. Practical guides for X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS): interpreting the carbon 1s spectrum. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 39, 013204 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ma, X. et al. Stabilizing Cu0–Cu+ sites by Pb-doping for highly efficient CO2 electroreduction to C2 products. Green Chem. 25, 7635–7641 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Han, S. et al. CO2 electroreduction to C2+ products over Cu–Pb heterojunction catalyst. ChemCatChem 16, e202300918 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Niu, W. et al. Pb-rich Cu grain boundary sites for selective CO-to-n-propanol electroconversion. Nat. Commun. 14, 4882 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gabardo, C. M. et al. Continuous carbon dioxide electroreduction to concentrated multi-carbon products using a membrane electrode assembly. Joule 3, 2777–2791 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Rad. 12, 537–541 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Yao, K. et al. In situ copper faceting enables efficient CO2/CO electrolysis. Nat. Commun. 15, 1749 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Perdew, J. P., Ernzerhof, M. & Burke, K. Rationale for mixing exact exchange with density functional approximations. J. Chem. Phys. 105, 9982–9985 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H–Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Yao, Z., Chan, M. K. Y. & Wolverton, C. Exploring the origin of anionic redox activity in super Li-rich iron oxide-based high-energy-density cathode materials. Chem. Mater. 34, 4536–4547 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ma, X. et al. Electrochemical CC coupling between CO2 and formaldehyde into ethanol. Chem Catal. 2, 3207–3224 (2022).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Xu, Q. et al. Identifying and alleviating the durability challenges in membrane-electrode-assembly devices for high-rate CO electrolysis. Nat. Catal. 6, 1042–1051 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Li, J. et al. Weak CO binding sites induced by Cu–Ag interfaces promote CO electroreduction to multi-carbon liquid products. Nat. Commun. 14, 698 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang, P. et al. Boosting electrocatalytic CO2-to-ethanol production via asymmetric C–C coupling. Nat. Commun. 13, 3754 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang, X. et al. Efficient electrosynthesis of n-propanol from carbon monoxide using a Ag–Ru–Cu catalyst. Nat. Energy 7, 170–176 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFA1507500 and 2022YFA1505100 to J.L.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (BE3250011 to J.L. and 52373228 to Z.Y), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (23×010301599 and 24×010301678 to J.L.), the Shanghai Pilot Program for Basic Research—Shanghai Jiao Tong University (21TQ1400227 to J.L.), Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project to J.L., the Ontario Research Foundation: Research Excellence Program to D.S., the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada to D.S., and TOTAL SE to D.S. A.O. gratefully acknowledges the financial support of Khalifa University for this work through the grant FSU-2025-006. Part of the XAS described in this paper was performed in May 2022 at the Canadian Light Source, a national research facility of the University of Saskatchewan, which is supported by NSERC, the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI), the National Research Council (NRC), the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Government of Saskatchewan and the University of Saskatchewan. We acknowledge the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility, China, for the provision of synchrotron radiation beamtime at beamlines BL13SSW and BL02B01. Support from Canada Research Chairs Program is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J.L. conceived the idea and supervised the project. P.L., N.S. and Y.W. carried out all the electrochemical experiments. P.P., A.O., R.K.M. and Y.X. contributed to electrode fabrication and assisted with the electrochemical testing. J.S. performed DFT calculations under the supervision of Z.Y., in which H.W., X.W. and Z.W. assisted with calculations and data analysis. P.L., N.S., H. Liu, Z.P. and Y.Z. performed XAS, NAP-XPS and Raman measurements, in which M.S., J.Z. and Y.H. assisted with the XAS testing, and S.S. and H.Z. assisted with the NAP-XPS testing. S.C. assisted with transmission electron microscopy characterizations. J.L. wrote the paper. D.S., Z.Y., H. Liang, A.O. and P.L. contributed to paper editing. All authors discussed the results and assisted during the paper preparation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhenpeng Yao or Jun Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Synthesis thanks Miho Yamauchi, Tao Yao and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Alexandra Groves, in collaboration with the Nature Synthesis team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Figs. 1–34, Discussion, Tables 1–6 and Note 1.

Supplementary Data (download XLSX )

Statistical source data for Supplementary Figs. 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 21–29, 31–33.

Source data

Source Data Figs. (download XLSX )

2c,d, 3c–f, 4a–d and 5a–g.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, P., Sun, N., Su, J. et al. Electrosynthesis of ethanol via CO–CHx cross-coupling on copper alloy catalysts with engineered oxygen affinity. Nat. Synth 4, 1462–1472 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-025-00868-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-025-00868-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing