Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Analysis of heterocycle formation and stereochemical control by a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase condensation domain

Abstract

Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) produce diverse bioactive peptides, including antibiotics and antitumour agents, by integrating proteinogenic and non-proteinogenic amino acids alongside tailoring modifications, such as epimerization (E) and cyclization. Here we demonstrate that the tetrahydropyrimidine ring of pyoverdine is synthesized by the condensation (C) domain PvdL-C3, revealing cyclization capability of a canonical NRPS domain. Analyses of PvdL-E2C3A3 cross-module structures reveal a stable E-C didomain catalytic platform maintained by the donor communication-mediating domain. Through mutagenesis and evolutionary analyses, we identified key active site residues shaping the catalytic channel, controlling both efficiency and specificity. We further engineered PvdL-C3 to accept l-epimers, unveiling latent substrate flexibility. Ultimately, our work provides a unifying model where domain architecture and catalytic channel features collectively govern NRPS function, elucidating a cyclization mechanism and providing a structural blueprint for future enzyme engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Module 3 of PvdL catalyses the tetrahydropyrimidine ring formation in pyoverdine.
Fig. 2: Cryo-EM structures of the cross-modular part of PvdL reveal a stable E2-C3 catalytic platform and its distinct conformational states.
Fig. 3: Structural snapshots of the PvdL-C3 domain in distinct binding states.
Fig. 4: Structure-guided mutations and catalytic mechanism of PvdL-C3.
Fig. 5: Phylogenetic, structural and mutational analysis of CcDab.
Fig. 6: Key residues controlling chirality in PvdL-C3.
Fig. 7: Structural basis for the reversal of stereoselectivity in the C₃-R3393A mutant.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data that support the findings of this study are available within the tables and figures in Supplementary Information. The 3D cryo-EM maps generated in this study have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (https://www.emdataresource.org/) under accession numbers EMD-64387, EMD-62988, EMD-62989 and EMD-62990 (Supplementary Table 4). The atomic coordinates have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org) under accession numbers 9UP2, 9LCO, 9LCP and 9LCQ. Cryo-EM maps are available via figshare at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30618215 (ref. 72). Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Walsh, C. T. Polyketide and nonribosomal peptide antibiotics: modularity and versatility. Science 303, 1805–1810 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Felnagle, E. A. et al. Nonribosomal peptide synthetases involved in the production of medically relevant natural products. Mol. Pharm. 5, 191–211 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Walsh, C. T., O’Brien, R. V. & Khosla, C. Nonproteinogenic amino acid building blocks for nonribosomal peptide and hybrid polyketide scaffolds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 52, 7098–7124 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hur, G. H., Vickery, C. R. & Burkart, M. D. Explorations of catalytic domains in non-ribosomal peptide synthetase enzymology. Nat. Prod. Rep. 29, 1074–1098 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Patel, K. D., MacDonald, M. R., Ahmed, S. F., Singh, J. & Gulick, A. M. Structural advances toward understanding the catalytic activity and conformational dynamics of modular nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Nat. Prod. Rep. 40, 1550–1582 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baltz, R. H. Function of MbtH homologs in nonribosomal peptide biosynthesis and applications in secondary metabolite discovery. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38, 1747–1760 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller, B. R., Drake, E. J., Shi, C., Aldrich, C. C. & Gulick, A. M. Structures of a nonribosomal peptide synthetase module bound to MbtH-like proteins support a highly dynamic domain architecture. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 22559–22571 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bloudoff, K. & Schmeing, T. M. Structural and functional aspects of the nonribosomal peptide synthetase condensation domain superfamily: discovery, dissection and diversity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Proteins Proteom. 1865, 1587–1604 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Walsh, C. T. & Nolan, E. M. Morphing peptide backbones into heterocycles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 5655–5656 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schofield, C. J. et al. Proteins of the penicillin biosynthesis pathway. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 857–864 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Haslinger, K., Peschke, M., Brieke, C., Maximowitsch, E. & Cryle, M. J. X-domain of peptide synthetases recruits oxygenases crucial for glycopeptide biosynthesis. Nature 521, 105–109 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Trauger, J. W., Kohli, R. M., Mootz, H. D., Marahiel, M. A. & Walsh, C. T. Peptide cyclization catalysed by the thioesterase domain of tyrocidine synthetase. Nature 407, 215–218 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gao, X. et al. Cyclization of fungal nonribosomal peptides by a terminal condensation-like domain. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 823–830 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Quadri, L. E. N., Keating, T. A., Patel, H. M. & Walsh, C. T. Assembly of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa nonribosomal peptide siderophore pyochelin: in vitro reconstitution of aryl-4,2-bisthiazoline synthetase activity from PchD, PchE, and PchF. Biochemistry 38, 14941–14954 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaudelli, N. M., Long, D. H. & Townsend, C. A. β-Lactam formation by a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase during antibiotic biosynthesis. Nature 520, 383–387 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ringel, M. T. & Brüser, T. The biosynthesis of pyoverdines. Microb. Cell 5, 424–437 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilson, B. R., Bogdan, A. R., Miyazawa, M., Hashimoto, K. & Tsuji, Y. Siderophores in iron metabolism: from mechanism to therapy potential. Trends Mol. Med. 22, 1077–1090 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gulick, A. M. Nonribosomal peptide synthetase biosynthetic clusters of ESKAPE pathogens. Nat. Prod. Rep. 34, 981–1009 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Clugston, S. L., Sieber, S. A., Marahiel, M. A. & Walsh, C. T. Chirality of peptide bond-forming condensation domains in nonribosomal peptide synthetases: the C5 domain of tyrocidine synthetase is a dCl catalyst. Biochemistry 42, 12095–12104 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peng, H., Schmiederer, J., Chen, X., Panagiotou, G. & Kries, H. Controlling substrate and stereospecificity of condensation domains in nonribosomal peptide synthetases. ACS Chem. Biol. 19, 599–606 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rausch, C., Hoof, I., Weber, T., Wohlleben, W. & Huson, D. H. Phylogenetic analysis of condensation domains in NRPS sheds light on their functional evolution. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 78 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wheadon, M. J. & Townsend, C. A. Evolutionary and functional analysis of an NRPS condensation domain integrates β-lactam, D-amino acid, and dehydroamino acid synthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2026017118 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heberlig, G. W., La Clair, J. J. & Burkart, M. D. Crosslinking intermodular condensation in non-ribosomal peptide biosynthesis. Nature 638, 261–269 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Diecker, J. et al. Structural basis for a scaffolding role of the COM domain in nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202506621 (2025).

  25. Cao, W. et al. In-situ purification of non-ribosomal peptide synthetases assembly line for structural and biochemical studies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 26, 1750 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Owen, J. G., Calcott, M. J., Robins, K. J. & Ackerley, D. F. Generating functional recombinant NRPS enzymes in the laboratory setting via peptidyl carrier protein engineering. Cell Chem. Biol. 23, 1395–1406 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tanovic, A., Samel, S. A., Essen, L.-O. & Marahiel, M. A. Crystal structure of the termination module of a nonribosomal peptide synthetase. Science 321, 659–663 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Hahn, M. & Stachelhaus, T. Selective interaction between nonribosomal peptide synthetases is facilitated by short communication-mediating domains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15585–15590 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dehling, E. et al. Mapping of the communication-mediating interface in nonribosomal peptide synthetases using a genetically encoded photocrosslinker supports an upside-down helix-hand motif. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 4345–4360 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fage, C. D. et al. Communication breakdown: dissecting the COM interfaces between the subunits of nonribosomal peptide synthetases. ACS Catal. 11, 10802–10813 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Reimer, J. M. et al. Structures of a dimodular nonribosomal peptide synthetase reveal conformational flexibility. Science 366, eaaw4388 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Klau, L. J. et al. The natural product domain Seeker version 2 (NaPDoS2) webtool relates ketosynthase phylogeny to biosynthetic function. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 102480 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD: a conserved domain database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D225–D229 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bloudoff, K., Fage, C. D., Marahiel, M. A. & Schmeing, T. M. Structural and mutational analysis of the nonribosomal peptide synthetase heterocyclization domain provides insight into catalysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 95–100 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, J. et al. Catalytic trajectory of a dimeric nonribosomal peptide synthetase subunit with an inserted epimerase domain. Nat. Commun. 13, 592 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Bloudoff, K., Rodionov, D. & Schmeing, T. M. Crystal structures of the first condensation domain of CDA synthetase suggest conformational changes during the synthetic cycle of nonribosomal peptide synthetases. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 3137–3150 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhong, L. et al. Engineering and elucidation of the lipoinitiation process in nonribosomal peptide biosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 12, 296 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Samel, S. A., Schoenafinger, G., Knappe, T. A., Marahiel, M. A. & Essen, L.-O. Structural and functional insights into a peptide bond-forming bidomain from a nonribosomal peptide synthetase. Structure 15, 781–792 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Keating, T. A., Marshall, C. G., Walsh, C. T. & Keating, A. E. The structure of VibH represents nonribosomal peptide synthetase condensation, cyclization and epimerization domains. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 9, 522–526 (2002).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Izoré, T. et al. Structures of a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase condensation domain suggest the basis of substrate selectivity. Nat. Commun. 12, 2511 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Pistofidis, A. et al. Structures and mechanism of condensation in non-ribosomal peptide synthesis. Nature 638, 270–278 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Pfeifer, B. A. Biosynthesis of complex polyketides in a metabolically engineered strain of E. coli. Science 291, 1790–1792 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Yin, J., Lin, A. J., Golan, D. E. & Walsh, C. T. Site-specific protein labeling by Sfp phosphopantetheinyl transferase. Nat. Protoc. 1, 280–285 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Thompson, R. F., Iadanza, M. G., Hesketh, E. L., Rawson, S. & Ranson, N. A. Collection, pre-processing and on-the-fly analysis of data for high-resolution, single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Protoc. 14, 100–118 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kimanius, D., Dong, L., Sharov, G., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. New tools for automated cryo-EM single-particle analysis in RELION-4.0. Biochem. J. 478, 4169–4185 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kimanius, D. et al. Data-driven regularization lowers the size barrier of cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 21, 1216–1221 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Wagner, T. et al. SPHIRE-crYOLO is a fast and accurate fully automated particle picker for cryo-EM. Commun. Biol. 2, 218 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Punjani, A. 3D variability analysis: resolving continuous flexibility and discrete heterogeneity from single particle cryo-EM. J. Struct. Biol. 213, 107702 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods 17, 1214–1221 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. DiMaio, F. et al. Atomic-accuracy models from 4.5-Å cryo-electron microscopy data with density-guided iterative local refinement. Nat. Methods 12, 361–365 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Croll, T. I. ISOLDE: a physically realistic environment for model building into low-resolution electron-density maps. Acta Crystallogr. D 74, 519–530 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Goddard, T. D. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: meeting modern challenges in visualization and analysis. Protein Sci. 27, 14–25 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Terlouw, B. R. et al. MIBiG 3.0: a community-driven effort to annotate experimentally validated biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D603–D610 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002195 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 113 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Waterhouse, A. M., Procter, J. B., Martin, D. M. A., Clamp, M. & Barton, G. J. Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25, 1189–1191 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J.-M. & Brenner, S. E. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188–1190 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Kim, S. et al. PubChem 2023 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1373–D1380 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the national center for biotechnology information. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D20–D26 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Blin, K. et al. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, W46–W50 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., Von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B. Q., Wong, T. K. F., Von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. S. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods 14, 587–589 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Robert, X. & Gouet, P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, W320–W324 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Cao, W. & Chen, S. L. Cryo-EM maps for PvdL-E2-C3-A3-PCP3 and related constructs. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30618215 (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai (NFPS), Zhangjiang Laboratory, for collecting the cryo-EM images used in this study. The computations in this paper were run on the π 2.0 cluster supported by the Center for High Performance Computing at Shanghai Jiao Tong University. This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grants 2021YFA0910500 to J.L.), the National Science Foundation of China (grants 32270033 and 22577073 to Z.W., 32271302 to J.L., 32201035 to J.W., 32171252 to Z.D.), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grants 2022T150412 and 2022M720085 to J.W.) and the Shanghai ‘Super Postdoctoral’ Incentive Program (grant 202112 to J.W.), Shanghai Pilot Program for Basic Research-Shanghai Jiao Tong University. We declare that the English grammar and flow of the text were polished by using Google’s Gemini large language models.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.W., W.C., J.W. and J.L. conceived of the study. W.C. and S.L.C. performed the biochemical reconstitution and mutagenesis experiments. W.C., J.W. and D.L. conducted the protein structural analysis and W.C. and X.W. performed the compound synthesis and analysis. Data curation was performed by W.C. and J.W. and formal analysis was conducted by Z.W., W.C., J.W. and J.L. The original draft of the paper was written by W.C. and Z.W. and all authors contributed to the review and editing. The project was supervised by J.L. (biochemical experiments) and Z.W. (biochemical and structural analysis experiments). Overall project administration was handled by Z.W. and Z.D., who also led the funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhijun Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Synthesis thanks Max Cryle, Andrew Gulick and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editor: Peter Seavill, in collaboration with the Nature Synthesis team.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Methods, Tables 1–6 and Figs. 1–33.

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Supplementary Video 1 (download MP4 )

3D variability analysis (3DVA) of the A conformation dataset revealing an oscillation of approximately 20° of the E2 domain relative to the C3 structural domain.

Supplementary Video 2 (download MP4 )

3D variability analysis (3DVA) of the D-conformation dataset showing the oscillation of the E2 domain relative to the C3 domain, and the movement of PCP2 from the E2 active site to the C3 donor site.

Supplementary Video 3 (download MP4 )

3D variability analysis (3DVA) illustrating the conformational switch of the C3 domain between open and closed states, synchronized with the binding and dissociation of the PCP2 domain.

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Source data for the chiral analysis bar chart presented in Supplementary Fig. 28.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 2 (download TXT )

Source data for the COMD mutation analysis bar chart (Fig. 2h) and the sequence conservation analysis (Fig. 2i).

Source Data Fig. 4 (download XLSX )

Source data for the relative production bar charts presented in Fig. 4b,d.

Source Data Fig. 5 (download TXT )

Source data for the phylogenetic tree analysis (Fig. 5a) and the enzymatic activity bar chart (Fig. 5c).

Source Data Fig. 6 (download TXT )

Source data for the multiple sequence alignment (Fig. 6a) and relative abundance bar chart (Fig. 6c).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, W., Wang, J., Chen, S.L. et al. Analysis of heterocycle formation and stereochemical control by a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase condensation domain. Nat. Synth (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-026-01014-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44160-026-01014-7

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing