Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Nanomedicines for cardiovascular disease

Abstract

The leading cause of death in the world, cardiovascular disease (CVD), remains a formidable condition for researchers, clinicians and patients alike. CVD comprises a broad collection of diseases spanning the heart, the vasculature and the blood that runs through and interconnects them. Limitations in CVD therapeutic and diagnostic landscapes have generated excitement for advances in nanomedicine, a field focused on improving patient outcomes through transformative therapies, imaging agents and ex vivo diagnostics. CVD nanomedicines are fundamentally shaped by their intended clinical application, including (1) cardiac or heart-related biomaterials, which can be functionally (for example, mechanically, immunologically, electrically) improved by incorporating nanomaterials; (2) the vasculature, involving systemically injected nanotherapeutics and imaging nanodiagnostics, nano-enabled biomaterials or tissue-nanoengineered solutions; and (3) improving the sensitivity and/or specificity of ex vivo diagnostic devices for patient samples. While immunotherapy has developed into a key pillar of oncology in the past dozen years, CVD immunotherapy and immunoimaging are recently emergent and likely to factor substantially in CVD management in the coming decade. The nanomaterials in CVD-related clinical trials and many promising preclinical strategies indicate that nanomedicine is on the cusp of greatly impacting patients with CVD. Here we review these recent advances, highlighting key clinical opportunities in the rapidly emerging field of CVD nanomedicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic breakdown of therapeutic and diagnostic cardiovascular nanomedicine applications.
Fig. 2: Cancer nanomedicine has far outpaced cardiovascular nanomedicine by numbers of annual publications and clinical trials.
Fig. 3: Nanoimmunomedicine for CVD.
Fig. 4: Nanotheranostics for CVD.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kanthi, Y., de la Zerda, A. & Smith, B. R. Nanotherapeutic shots through the heart of plaque. ACS Nano 14, 1236–1242 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Koene, R. J., Prizment, A. E., Blaes, A. & Konety, S. H. Shared risk factors in cardiovascular disease and cancer. Circulation 133, 1104–1114 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Lenoir, T. & Herron, P. The NCI and the takeoff of nanomedicine. J. Nanomedicine Biotherapeutic Discov. 5, 135 (2015).

  4. Von Eschenbach, A. C. NCI sets goal of eliminating suffering and death due to cancer by 2015. J. Natl Med. Assoc. 95, 637–639 (2003).

  5. Smith, B. R. & Gambhir, S. S. Nanomaterials for in vivo imaging. Chem. Rev. 117, 901–986 (2017). This paper comprehensively reviews the variety of nanomaterials applied in biomedical imaging, including imaging of inflammatory diseases such as CVD, with special focus on imaging within living individuals preclinically and clinically.

  6. Ashtari, K. et al. Electrically conductive nanomaterials for cardiac tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 144, 162–179 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Malki, M., Fleischer, S., Shapira, A. & Dvir, T. Gold nanorod-based engineered cardiac patch for suture-free engraftment by near IR. Nano Lett. 18, 4069–4073 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhu, X., Vo, C., Taylor, M. & Smith, B. R. Non-spherical micro- and nanoparticles in nanomedicine. Mater. Horizons 6, 1094–1121 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Park, S. M., Aalipour, A., Vermesh, O., Yu, J. H. & Gambhir, S. S. Towards clinically translatable in vivo nanodiagnostics. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 17014 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang, W., Rutherford, D., Vuong, T. & Liu, H. Nanomaterials for treating cardiovascular diseases: a review. Bioact. Mater. 2, 185–198 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Fung, G., Luo, H., Qiu, Y., Yang, D. & McManus, B. Myocarditis. Circ. Res. 118, 496–514 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oster, M. E. et al. Myocarditis cases reported after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination in the US from December 2020 to August 2021. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 327, 331–340 (2022).

  13. Mele, D., Flamigni, F., Rapezzi, C. & Ferrari, R. Myocarditis in COVID-19 patients: current problems. Intern. Emerg. Med. 16, 1123–1129 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Solazzo, M., O’Brien, F. J., Nicolosi, V. & Monaghan, M. G. The rationale and emergence of electroconductive biomaterial scaffolds in cardiac tissue engineering. APL Bioeng. 3, 041501 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahmoudi, M. et al. Multiscale technologies for treatment of ischemic cardiomyopathy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 845–855 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Sadek, H. & Olson, E. N. Toward the goal of human heart regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 26, 7–16 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang, K. et al. An off-the-shelf artificial cardiac patch improves cardiac repair after myocardial infarction in rats and pigs. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, 9683 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. R Amin, D. et al. Nanomaterials for cardiac tissue engineering. Molecules 25, 5189 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Feiner, R. et al. Engineered hybrid cardiac patches with multifunctional electronics for online monitoring and regulation of tissue function. Nat. Mater. 15, 679–685 (2016). This study developed a cardiac patch integrated with cardiac cells, electronics for cell recording and electrical synchronization for cell contraction that is also capable of drug release to help regulate cardiac function.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Brazhkina, O. & Davis, M. E. 3D bioprinting in cardiovascular nanomedicine. Nanomedicine 16, 1347–1350 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vong, L. B. et al. Novel angiogenesis therapeutics by redox injectable hydrogel—regulation of local nitric oxide generation for effective cardiovascular therapy. Biomaterials 167, 143–152 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Qi, Q. et al. Spatiotemporal delivery of nanoformulated liraglutide for cardiac regeneration after myocardial infarction. Int. J. Nanomedicine 12, 4835 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Oduk, Y. et al. VEGF nanoparticles repair the heart after myocardial infarction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 314, H278–H284 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Somasuntharam, I. et al. Delivery of Nox2-NADPH oxidase siRNA with polyketal nanoparticles for improving cardiac function following myocardial infarction. Biomaterials 34, 7790–7798 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang, J. et al. High-throughput screening identifies microRNAs that target Nox2 and improve function after acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 312, H1002–H1012 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Ferreira, M. P. A. et al. Drug-loaded multifunctional nanoparticles targeted to the endocardial layer of the injured heart modulate hypertrophic signaling. Small 13, 1701276 (2017).

  27. Nakano, Y. et al. Nanoparticle-mediated delivery of irbesartan induces cardioprotection from myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury by antagonizing monocyte-mediated inflammation. Sci. Rep. 6, 29601 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Nagaoka, K. et al. A new therapeutic modality for acute myocardial infarction: nanoparticle-mediated delivery of pitavastatin induces cardioprotection from ischemia–reperfusion injury via activation of PI3K/Akt pathway and anti-inflammation in a rat model. PLoS ONE 10, e0132451 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Saludas, L. et al. Extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics for heart repair. Nanomaterials 11, 570 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tang, J. et al. Targeted repair of heart injury by stem cells fused with platelet nanovesicles. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 17–26 (2018). This paper describes the use of platelet-derived nanovesicles to enhance the delivery and binding of CSCs by fusing the stem cells with platelet nanovesicles. Thus, the fused cells express platelet surface markers that are associated with platelet adhesion to injury sites, thereby enhancing cellular retention and myocardial repair.

  31. Rurik, J. G. et al. CAR T cells produced in vivo to treat cardiac injury. Science 375, 91–96 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Bejerano, T., Etzion, S., Elyagon, S., Etzion, Y. & Cohen, S. Nanoparticle delivery of miRNA-21 mimic to cardiac macrophages improves myocardial remodeling after myocardial infarction. Nano Lett. 18, 5885–5891 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Somasuntharam, I. et al. Knockdown of TNF-α by DNAzyme gold nanoparticles as an anti-inflammatory therapy for myocardial infarction. Biomaterials 83, 12–22 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Niu, J., Azfer, A., Rogers, L. M., Wang, X. & Kolattukudy, P. E. Cardioprotective effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles in a transgenic murine model of cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc. Res. 73, 549–559 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hu, C., Luo, R. & Wang, Y. Heart valves cross-linked with erythrocyte membrane drug-loaded nanoparticles as a biomimetic strategy for anti-coagulation, anti-inflammation, anti-calcification, and endothelialization. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 41113–41126 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Li, Y. et al. Biofunctionalization of decellularized porcine aortic valve with OPG-loaded PCL nanoparticles for anti-calcification. RSC Adv. 9, 11882–11893 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lopez-Moya, M. et al. Optimizing glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue heart valves with chondroitin sulfate hydrogel for endothelialization and shielding against deterioration. Biomacromolecules 19, 1234–1244 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Capulli, A. K. et al. JetValve: rapid manufacturing of biohybrid scaffolds for biomimetic heart valve replacement. Biomaterials 133, 229–241 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Hasan, A. et al. Micro and nanotechnologies in heart valve tissue engineering. Biomaterials 103, 278–292 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Vellayappan, M. V. et al. Tangible nanocomposites with diverse properties for heart valve application. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 16, 033504 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Gasper, W. J. et al. Adventitial nab-rapamycin injection reduces porcine femoral artery luminal stenosis induced by balloon angioplasty via inhibition of medial proliferation and adventitial inflammation. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 6, 701–709 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Yin, R. X., Yang, D. Z. & Wu, J. Z. Nanoparticle drug- and gene-eluting stents for the prevention and treatment of coronary restenosis. Theranostics 4, 175–200 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Tu, C., Das, S., Baker, A. B., Zoldan, J. & Suggs, L. J. Nanoscale strategies: treatment for peripheral vascular disease and critical limb ischemia. ACS Nano 9, 3436–3452 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Fukunishi, T. et al. Preclinical study of patient-specific cell-free nanofiber tissue-engineered vascular grafts using 3-dimensional printing in a sheep model. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 153, 924–932 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rocco, K. A., Maxfield, M. W., Best, C. A., Dean, E. W. & Breuer, C. K. In vivo applications of electrospun tissue-engineered vascular grafts: a review. Tissue Eng. Part B Rev. 20, 628–640 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stine, S. J., Popowski, K. D., Su, T. & Cheng, K. Exosome and biomimetic nanoparticle therapies for cardiac regenerative medicine. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 15, 674–684 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Masuda, S. et al. Imatinib mesylate-incorporated nanoparticle-eluting stent attenuates in-stent neointimal formation in porcine coronary arteries. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 18, 1043–1053 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sane, M. et al. Bivalirudin and sirolimus co-eluting coronary stent: potential strategy for the prevention of stent thrombosis and restenosis. Int. J. Pharm. 600, 120403 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Vandergriff, A. et al. Targeting regenerative exosomes to myocardial infarction using cardiac homing peptide. Theranostics 8, 1869–1878 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Hu, S. et al. Exosome-eluting stents for vascular healing after ischaemic injury. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 1174–1188 (2021). This paper describes the development of stents that release mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes to enhance vascular healing in rats with renal ischemia–reperfusion injury, promoting endothelial cell tube formation and proliferation and impairing the migration of smooth muscle cells.

  51. Chorny, M. et al. Targeting stents with local delivery of paclitaxel-loaded magnetic nanoparticles using uniform fields. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 8346–8351 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Singh, A. P., Biswas, A., Shukla, A. & Maiti, P. Targeted therapy in chronic diseases using nanomaterial-based drug delivery vehicles. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 4, 33 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Frank-Kamenetsky, M. et al. Therapeutic RNAi targeting PCSK9 acutely lowers plasma cholesterol in rodents and LDL cholesterol in nonhuman primates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11915–11920 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Tadin-Strapps, M. et al. siRNA-induced liver ApoB knockdown lowers serum LDL-cholesterol in a mouse model with human-like serum lipids. J. Lipid Res. 52, 1084–1097 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Beldman, T. J. et al. Nanoparticle-aided characterization of arterial endothelial architecture during atherosclerosis progression and metabolic therapy. ACS Nano 13, 13759–13774 (2019).

  56. Park, S. et al. Therapeutic use of H2O2-responsive anti-oxidant polymer nanoparticles for doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy. Biomaterials 35, 5944–5953 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tsukie, N. et al. Pitavastatin-incorporated nanoparticle-eluting stents attenuate in-stent stenosis without delayed endothelial healing effects in a porcine coronary artery model. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 20, 32–45 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Chan, J. M. et al. In vivo prevention of arterial restenosis with paclitaxel-encapsulated targeted lipid–polymeric nanoparticles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19347–19352 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Bahnson, E. S. M. et al. Targeted nitric oxide delivery by supramolecular nanofibers for the prevention of restenosis after arterial injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 24, 401–418 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Li, J. M. et al. Local arterial nanoparticle delivery of siRNA for NOX2 knockdown to prevent restenosis in an atherosclerotic rat model. Gene Ther. 17, 1279–1287 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Duivenvoorden, R. et al. A statin-loaded reconstituted high-density lipoprotein nanoparticle inhibits atherosclerotic plaque inflammation. Nat. Commun. 5, 3065 (2014). This study developed an HDL-based nanoparticle loaded with statins to reduce atherosclerotic plaque inflammation.

  62. Rong, T. et al. Enhanced anti-atherosclerotic efficacy of pH-responsively releasable ganglioside GM3 delivered by reconstituted high-density lipoprotein. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 13624 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Shen, M. et al. Shear stress and ROS-responsive biomimetic micelles for atherosclerosis via ROS consumption. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 126, 112164 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kim, H. et al. Affinity-driven design of cargo-switching nanoparticles to leverage a cholesterol-rich microenvironment for atherosclerosis therapy. ACS Nano 14, 6519–6531 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Gao, W. et al. Copper sulfide nanoparticles as a photothermal switch for TRPV1 signaling to attenuate atherosclerosis. Nat. Commun. 9, 231 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Xu, M. et al. Enhanced macrophage polarization induced by COX-2 inhibitor-loaded Pd octahedral nanozymes for treatment of atherosclerosis. Chin. Chem. Lett. 34, 107585 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Huang, Y. et al. Platelet-derived nanomotor coated balloon for atherosclerosis combination therapy. J. Mater. Chem. B 8, 5765–5775 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Peng, X. et al. AgFeS2 nanoparticles as a novel photothermal platform for effective artery stenosis therapy. Nanoscale 12, 11288–11296 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lockhart, J. H. et al. Self-assembled miRNA-switch nanoparticles target denuded regions and prevent restenosis. Mol. Ther. 29, 1744–1757 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Ridker, P. M. et al. Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 1119–1131 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Baylis, R. A., Gomez, D., Mallat, Z., Pasterkamp, G. & Owens, G. K. The CANTOS trial: one important step for clinical cardiology but a giant leap for vascular biology. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 37, e174–e177 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Nahrendorf, M. Myeloid cell contributions to cardiovascular health and disease. Nat. Med. 24, 711–720 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. van Leent, M. M. T. et al. Regulating trained immunity with nanomedicine. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7, 465–481 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Smith, B. R. Nanotherapeutics for cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 18, 617–618 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Chen, W. et al. Macrophage-targeted nanomedicine for the diagnosis and treatment of atherosclerosis. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2021, 228–249 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Tang, J. et al. Inhibiting macrophage proliferation suppresses atherosclerotic plaque inflammation. Sci. Adv. 1, e1400223 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Lameijer, M. A., Tang, J., Nahrendorf, M., Beelen, R. H. J. & Mulder, W. J. M. Monocytes and macrophages as nanomedicinal targets for improved diagnosis and treatment of disease. Expert Rev. Mol. Diagn. 13, 567–580 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Leuschner, F. et al. Therapeutic siRNA silencing in inflammatory monocytes in mice. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 1005–1010 (2011). This work describes a monocyte-targeted nanoparticle that delivers siRNA to knockdown surface homing proteins and decrease iMo trafficking, thereby suppressing inflammation for the treatment of atherosclerotic plaques and other inflammatory diseases.

  79. Sager, H. B. et al. RNAi targeting multiple cell adhesion molecules reduces immune cell recruitment and vascular inflammation after myocardial infarction. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 342ra80 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Majmudar, M. D. et al. Polymeric nanoparticle PET/MR imaging allows macrophage detection in atherosclerotic plaques. Circ. Res. 112, 755–761 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Lameijer, M. et al. Efficacy and safety assessment of a TRAF6-targeted nanoimmunotherapy in atherosclerotic mice and non-human primates. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 279–292 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Seijkens, T. T. P. et al. Targeting CD40-induced TRAF6 signaling in macrophages reduces atherosclerosis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 71, 527–542 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Guo, Y. et al. Synthetic high-density lipoprotein-mediated targeted delivery of liver X receptors agonist promotes atherosclerosis regression. EBioMedicine 28, 225–233 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Tang, J. et al. Immune cell screening of a nanoparticle library improves atherosclerosis therapy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E6731–E6740 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Smith, B. R. et al. Selective uptake of single-walled carbon nanotubes by circulating monocytes for enhanced tumour delivery. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 481–487 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Flores, A. M. et al. Pro-efferocytic nanoparticles are specifically taken up by lesional macrophages and prevent atherosclerosis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 154–161 (2020). This study reports an immune cell-selective nanoparticle to treat atherosclerosis by stimulating intraplaque macrophage efferocytosis, demonstrating the elimination of off-target side effects due to the high iMo selectivity of the nanoparticles.

  87. Zhang, Y. et al. Macrophage-targeted single walled carbon nanotubes stimulate phagocytosis via pH-dependent drug release. Nano Res. 14, 762–769 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Zheng, J., Qi, R., Dai, C., Li, G. & Sang, M. Enzyme catalysis biomotor engineering of neutrophils for nanodrug delivery and cell-based thrombolytic therapy. ACS Nano 16, 2330–2344 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Kamaly, N. et al. Targeted interleukin-10 nanotherapeutics developed with a microfluidic chip enhance resolution of inflammation in advanced atherosclerosis. ACS Nano 10, 5280–5292 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Fredman, G. et al. Targeted nanoparticles containing the proresolving peptide Ac2-26 protect against advanced atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic mice. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 275ra20 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Lobatto, M. E. et al. Multimodal clinical imaging to longitudinally assess a nanomedical anti-inflammatory treatment in experimental atherosclerosis. Mol. Pharm. 7, 2020–2029 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Flores, A. M. et al. Nanoparticle therapy for vascular diseases. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 39, 635–646 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Alaarg, A. et al. Applying nanomedicine in maladaptive inflammation and angiogenesis. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 119, 143–158 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Tarkin, J. M. et al. Imaging atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 118, 750–769 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Chin, D. D., Chowdhuri, S. & Chung, E. J. Calcium-binding nanoparticles for vascular disease. Regen. Eng. Transl. Med. 5, 74–85 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Zhang, L. et al. An atherosclerotic plaque-targeted single-chain antibody for MR/NIR-II imaging of atherosclerosis and anti-atherosclerosis therapy. J. Nanobiotechnology 19, 296 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Smith, B. R. et al. Localization to atherosclerotic plaque and biodistribution of biochemically derivatized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) contrast particles for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Biomed. Microdevices 9, 719–727 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Evans, R. J. et al. Targeted molecular iron oxide contrast agents for imaging atherosclerotic plaque. Nanotheranostics 4, 184–194 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Kim, M. et al. Comparison of in vivo targeting ability between cRGD and collagen-targeting peptide conjugated nano-carriers for atherosclerosis. J. Control. Release 269, 337–346 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Kim, C. W. et al. In vivo MRI detection of intraplaque macrophages with biocompatible silica-coated iron oxide nanoparticles in murine atherosclerosis. J. Appl. Biomater. Funct. Mater. 19, 22808000211014751 (2021).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Moon, H. et al. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial inflammation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in a rat model of experimental autoimmune myocarditis. Circulation 125, 2603–2612 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Tay, Z. W. et al. Magnetic particle imaging: an emerging modality with prospects in diagnosis, targeting and therapy of cancer. Cancers 13, 5285 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Zhu, X., Li, J., Peng, P., Hosseini Nassab, N. & Smith, B. R. Quantitative drug release monitoring in tumors of living subjects by magnetic particle imaging nanocomposite. Nano Lett. 19, 6725–6733 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Mangarova, D. B. et al. Ex vivo magnetic particle imaging of vascular inflammation in abdominal aortic aneurysm in a murine model. Sci. Rep. 10, 12410 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Gifani, M. et al. Ultraselective carbon nanotubes for photoacoustic imaging of inflamed atherosclerotic plaques. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2101005 (2021). These results demonstrate that highly immune cell-selective nanoparticles can exploit native cell trafficking to specifically image inflamed atherosclerotic plaques by photoacoustic tomography.

  106. Xie, Z. et al. In vivo assessment of inflammation in carotid atherosclerosis by noninvasive photoacoustic imaging. Theranostics 10, 4694–4704 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  107. Luehmann, H. P. et al. PET/CT imaging of chemokine receptor CCR5 in vascular injury model using targeted nanoparticle. J. Nucl. Med. 55, 629–634 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Wang, P. et al. Nano-immunoimaging. Nanoscale Horiz. 5, 628–653 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Bourantas, C. V. et al. Hybrid intravascular imaging: recent advances, technical considerations, and current applications in the study of plaque pathophysiology. Eur. Heart J. 38, 400–412 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Senders, M. L. et al. Probing myeloid cell dynamics in ischemic heart disease by nanotracer hot spot imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 15, 398–405 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Leeper, N. J., Park, S. & Smith, B. R. High-density lipoprotein nanoparticle imaging in atherosclerotic vascular disease. JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2, 98–100 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Syed, M. B. J. et al. Emerging techniques in atherosclerosis imaging. Br. J. Radiol. 92, 20180309 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Yu, S. S. et al. Enzymatic- and temperature-sensitive controlled release of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxides (USPIOs). J. Nanobiotechnology 9, 7 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Ta, H. T. et al. Activatable magnetic resonance nanosensor as a potential imaging agent for detecting and discriminating thrombosis. Nanoscale 10, 15103–15115 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Wang, Y., Osborne, M. T., Tung, B., Li, M. & Li, Y. Imaging cardiovascular calcification. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 7, e008564 (2018).

  116. Pellico, J. et al. HAP-multitag, a PET and positive MRI contrast nanotracer for the longitudinal characterization of vascular calcifications in atherosclerosis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 45279–45290 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Chin, D. D. et al. Hydroxyapatite-binding micelles for the detection of vascular calcification in atherosclerosis. J. Mater. Chem. B 7, 6449–6457 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Cormode, D. P. et al. Atherosclerotic plaque composition: analysis with multicolor CT and targeted gold nanoparticles. Radiology 256, 774–782 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Muslu, Y., Utkur, M., Demirel, O. B. & Saritas, E. U. Calibration-free relaxation-based multi-color magnetic particle imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 37, 1920–1931 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Vilian, A. T. E. et al. Efficient electron-mediated electrochemical biosensor of gold wire for the rapid detection of C-reactive protein: a predictive strategy for heart failure. Biosens. Bioelectron. 142, 111549 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Lee, S. H. et al. A photothermal biosensor for detection of C-reactive protein in human saliva. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 246, 471–476 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Vashist, S. K., Schneider, E. M. & Luong, J. H. T. Surface plasmon resonance-based immunoassay for human C-reactive protein. Analyst 140, 4445–4452 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Aray, A. et al. SPR-based plastic optical fibre biosensor for the detection of C-reactive protein in serum. J. Biophotonics 9, 1077–1084 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Xing, Y. et al. The improved sensitive detection of C-reactive protein based on the chemiluminescence immunoassay by employing monodispersed PAA-Au/Fe3O4 nanoparticles and zwitterionic glycerophosphoryl choline. J. Mater. Chem. B 5, 3919–3926 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Wu, B. et al. A simple label-free aptamer-based method for C-reactive protein detection. Anal. Methods 8, 4177–4180 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Adukauskiene, D. et al. Clinical relevance of high sensitivity C-reactive protein in cardiology. Medicina 52, 1–10 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Sproston, N. R. & Ashworth, J. J. Role of C-reactive protein at sites of inflammation and infection. Front. Immunol. 9, 754 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Byzova, N. A., Vengerov, Y. Y., Voloshchuk, S. G., Zherdev, A. V. & Dzantiev, B. B. Development of a lateral flow highway: ultra-rapid multitracking immunosensor for cardiac markers. Sensors 19, 5494 (2019). This study developed a nanoparticle-based method to rapidly and reproducibly test levels of multiple cardiovascular blood biomarkers.

  129. Zavaleta, C. L. et al. Multiplexed imaging of surface enhanced Raman scattering nanotags in living mice using noninvasive Raman spectroscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13511–13516 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Huang, Z. et al. Sensitive polydopamine bi-functionalized SERS immunoassay for microalbuminuria detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 142, 111542 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Li, X. et al. Autoantibody profiling on a plasmonic nano-gold chip for the early detection of hypertensive heart disease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7089–7094 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Mansuriya, B. D. & Altintas, Z. Enzyme-free electrochemical nano-immunosensor based on graphene quantum dots and gold nanoparticles for cardiac biomarker determination. Nanomaterials 11, 578 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Tabish, T. A., Hayat, H., Abbas, A. & Narayan, R. J. Graphene quantum dots-based electrochemical biosensing platform for early detection of acute myocardial infarction. Biosensors 12, 77 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  134. Jang, A. S., Praveen Kumar, P. P. & Lim, D. K. Attomolar sensitive magnetic microparticles and a surface-enhanced Raman scattering-based assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid targets. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 138–149 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Shipp, G. Ultrasensitive measurement of protein and nucleic acid biomarkers for earlier disease detection and more effective therapies. Biotechnol. Healthc. 3, 35–40 (2006).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Weissleder, R., Schwaiger, M. C., Gambhir, S. S. & Hricak, H. Imaging approaches to optimize molecular therapies. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 355ps16 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Johnson, K. B. et al. Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care. Clin. Transl. Sci. 14, 86–93 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Shah, P. et al. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in clinical development: a translational perspective. NPJ Digit. Med. 2, 69 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Shah, P. N. et al. Extravasation of Brownian spheroidal nanoparticles through vascular pores. Biophys. J. 115, 1103–1115 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Iafisco, M., Alogna, A., Miragoli, M. & Catalucci, D. Cardiovascular nanomedicine: the route ahead. Nanomedicine 14, 2391–2394 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Barbero, F. et al. Formation of the protein corona: the interface between nanoparticles and the immune system. Semin. Immunol. 34, 52–60 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Immune discovery aplenty at twenty. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 21, 613 (2021).

  143. Hergenreider, E. et al. Atheroprotective communication between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells through miRNAs. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 249–256 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Kharlamov, A. N. et al. Plasmonic photothermal therapy of atherosclerosis with nanoparticles: long-term outcomes and safety in NANOM-FIM trial. Future Cardiol. 13, 345–363 (2017). This first-in-human clinical nanoparticle study showed that silica gold nanoparticles used to treat human atherosclerotic plaques by photothermal therapy resulted in better safety and fewer adverse cardiovascular events and revascularization than stents.

  145. Binderup, T. et al. Imaging-assisted nanoimmunotherapy for atherosclerosis in multiple species. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaaw7736 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  146. Yao, J. et al. Low-intensity focused ultrasound-responsive ferrite-encapsulated nanoparticles for atherosclerotic plaque neovascularization theranostics. Adv. Sci. 8, e2100850 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Ma, B. et al. Biomimetic-coated nanoplatform with lipid-specific imaging and ROS responsiveness for atherosclerosis-targeted theranostics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 35410–35421 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Wang, K. et al. Highly bright AIE nanoparticles by regulating the substituent of rhodanine for precise early detection of atherosclerosis and drug screening. Adv. Mater. 34, 2106994 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Zapotoczny, S., Szczubialka, K. & Nowakowska, M. Nanoparticles in endothelial theranostics. Pharm. Rep. 67, 751–755 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. Keliher, E. et al. Polyglucose nanoparticles with renal elimination and macrophage avidity facilitate PET imaging in ischaemic heart disease. Nat. Commun. 8, 14064 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  151. Adir, O. et al. Integrating artificial intelligence and nanotechnology for precision cancer medicine. Adv. Mater. 32, e1901989 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Hu, R. et al. Living macrophage-delivered tetrapod PdH nanoenzyme for targeted atherosclerosis management by ROS scavenging, hydrogen anti-inflammation, and autophagy activation. ACS Nano 16, 15959–15976 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Wang, B. et al. Intravascular photoacoustic imaging of lipid in atherosclerotic plaques in the presence of luminal blood. Optics Lett. 37, 1244–1246 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Wensink, G. E. et al. Patient-derived organoids as a predictive biomarker for treatment response in cancer patients. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 5, 30 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  155. Wang, W. et al. Endogenous stimuli-activatable nanomedicine for immune theranostics for cancer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 2100386 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge our funding sources, including the American Heart Association Transformational Project Award 18TPA34230113 and the NIH (R01 CA244491 to B.R.S. and R01HL161069-02 to E.R.E.). Correspondence and requests should be addressed to B.R.S. at smit2901@msu.edu.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

B.R.S. wrote the draft and made figures; E.R.E. made key edits and additions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan Ronain Smith.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

E.R.E. receives research support from Abiomed and Shockwave; is a consultant to BEV, Cascade, Cipherome, Marusan Pharmaceutics, Peregrine and Tekla; serves on the boards of Butterfly, Colossal and Xenter; and is a founder of Autus, BioDevek and PanTher Therapeutics. B.R.S. declares no competing interests.

Peer review information

Nature Cardiovascular Research thanks Ke Cheng, Kanyi Pu and Willem Mulder for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, B.R., Edelman, E.R. Nanomedicines for cardiovascular disease. Nat Cardiovasc Res 2, 351–367 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44161-023-00232-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44161-023-00232-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research