Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Psychology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications psychology
  3. articles
  4. article
Changes in political attitudes are associated with changes in neural responses to political content
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 January 2026

Changes in political attitudes are associated with changes in neural responses to political content

  • Gal Boiman1 na1,
  • Tal Ohad1 na1,
  • Yohay Zvi  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0002-3562-369X1,
  • Noa Katabi1 &
  • …
  • Yaara Yeshurun  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-0843-69981,2 

Communications Psychology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 118 Accesses

  • 7 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Human behaviour

Abstract

Political identity shapes neural responses to political content, but how these responses change within individuals over time remains unexplored. Here, we tested this by leveraging a unique political crisis. We conducted two fMRI scans separated by two and a half years, during which 21 participants viewed identical political videos. This period coincided with political instability that potentially caused participants to shift their attitudes towards the videos. Analysis revealed a neural plasticity hierarchical pattern: primary sensory regions showed minimal changes, while limbic, reward, and memory networks exhibited the most substantial differences between sessions. Specifically, the amygdala, hippocampus, and caudate demonstrated activity patterns that tracked changes in interpretation. Notably, neural changes in these regions correlated with shifts in political in-group affiliations, but not statistically significantly with changes in ideological positions. These findings provide empirical support for the hypothesis that social and psychological processes shape neural responses to political content, rather than vice versa.

Similar content being viewed by others

Neural responses to emotional displays by politicians: differential mu and alpha suppression patterns in response to in-party and out-party leaders

Article Open access 11 March 2025

Examining emotion reactivity to politically polarizing media in a randomized controlled trial of mindfulness training versus active coping training

Article Open access 12 February 2025

Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms

Article 01 December 2021

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1778768080. Additionally, neural maps of Figs. 3 and 4 are hosted on Neurovault at https://neurovault.org/collections/19578/81

Code availability

The code that supports the findings of this study is openly available at https://github.com/YeYaLab/Political-Identity-Change.git82.

References

  1. Huddy, L. From social to political identity: a critical examination of social identity theory. Political Psychol. 22, 127–156 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Unsworth, K. L. & Fielding, K. S. It’s political: How the salience of one’s political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. Glob. Environ. Change 27, 131–137 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bassan-Nygate, L. & Weiss, C. M. Party competition and cooperation shape affec-tive polarization: evidence from natural and survey experiments in Israel. Comparative Political Stud. 55 https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211024283 (2022).

  4. Freire, A. Left–right ideology as a dimension of identification and of competition. J. Political Ideol. 20, 43–68 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schulze, H. Who uses right-wing alternative online media? An exploration of audience characteristics. Politics Gov. 8, 6–18 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Graham, J., Nosek, B. A. & Haidt, J. The moral stereotypes of liberals and conservatives: exaggeration of differences across the political spectrum. PLoS ONE 7, e50092 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wojcik, S. P., Hovasapian, A., Graham, J., Motyl, M. & Ditto, P. H. Conservatives report, but liberals display, greater happiness. Science 347, 1243–1246 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stewart, B. D. & Morris, D. S. Moving morality beyond the in-group: Liberals and conservatives show differences on group-framed moral foundations and these differences mediate the relationships to perceived bias and threat. Front. Psychol. 12, 579908 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D., Iyer, R. & Haidt, J. Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 3, 537–544 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frenda, S. J., Knowles, E. D., Saletan, W. & Loftus, E. F. False memories of fabricated political events. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 280–286 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vallone, R. P., Ross, L. & Lepper, M. R. The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 49, 577–585 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ahn, W. Y. et al. Nonpolitical images evoke neural predictors of political ideology. Curr. Biol. 24, 2693–2699 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Galvan, A. et al. The role of ventral frontostriatal circuitry in reward-based learning in humans. J. Neurosci. 25, 8650–8656 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gozzi, M., Zamboni, G., Krueger, F. & Grafman, J. Interest in politics modulates neural activity in the amygdala and ventral striatum. Hum. Brain Mapp. 31, 1763–1771 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jost, J. T., Nam, H. H., Amodio, D. M. & Van Bavel, J. J. Political neuroscience: the beginning of a beautiful friendship. Political Psychol. 35, 3–42 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rule, N. O. et al. Voting behavior is reflected in amygdala response across cultures. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 5, 349–355 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schreiber, D. et al. Red Brain, Blue Brain: Evaluative Processes Differ in Democrats and Republicans. PLOS ONE 8, e52970 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leong, Y. C., Chen, J., Willer, R. & Zaki, J. Conservative and liberal attitudes drive polarized neural responses to political content. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117, 27731–27739 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dieffenbach, M. C. et al. Neural reference groups: a synchrony-based classification approach for predicting attitudes using fNIRS. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 16, 117–128 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. van Baar, J. M., Halpern, D. J. & FeldmanHall, O. Intolerance of uncertainty modulates brain-to-brain synchrony during politically polarized perception. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2022491118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Broom, T. W., Stahl, J. L., Ping, E. E. & Wagner, D. D. They saw a debate: Political polarization is associated with greater multivariate neural synchrony when viewing the opposing candidate speak. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 35, 60–73 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jacoby, N. et al. Partisans process policy-based and identity-based messages using dissociable neural systems. Cereb. Cortex 34, bhae368 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Katabi, N. et al. Deeper than you think: partisanship-dependent brain responses in early sensory and motor brain regions. J. Neurosci. 43, 1027–1037 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rahat, G. & Kenig, O. From Party Politics to Personalized Politics?: Party Change And Political Personalization in Democracies. Oxford University Press.(2018).

  25. Shahbari, I. Israel takes stock: the legacy of Benjamin Netanyahu. Political Insight 12, 34–36 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gabay, N. The effect of news media political bias on pre-elections poll results: evidence from the 2019–20 Israeli elections. Isr. Aff. 28, 917–939 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Poll: Most Yamina voters displeased with Bennett over alliance with Lapid. The Times of Israel. May 31 (2021). Available from https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/poll-most-yamina-voters-displeased-with-bennett-over-alliance-with-lapid/.

  28. Lu, X., Gao, J. & Szymanski, B. K. The evolution of polarization in the legislative branch of government. J. R. Soc. Interface 16, 20190010 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Finkel, E. J. et al. Political sectarianism in America. Science 370, 533–536 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nelson, M. H. Resentment is like drinking poison? the heterogeneous health effects of affective polarization. J. Health Soc. Behav. 63, 508–524 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N. & Westwood, S. J. The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22, 129–146 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yeshurun, Y. et al. Same story, different story: the neural representation of interpretive frameworks. Psychol. Sci. 28, 307–319 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ames, D. L., Honey, C. J., Chow, M. A., Todorov, A. & Hasson, U. Contextual alignment of cognitive and neural dynamics. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 27, 655–664 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Pajula, J. & Tohka, J. How many is enough? Effect of sample size in inter-subject correlation analysis of fMRI. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2016, 2–2 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Methodol.) 57, 289–300 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Simony, E. et al. Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension. Nat. Commun. 7, 12141 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nichols, T. E. Multiple testing corrections, nonparametric methods, and random field theory. Neuroimage 62, 811–815 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fan, L. et al. The human brainnetome Atlas: a new brain atlas based on connectional architecture. Cereb. Cortex 26, 3508–3526 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. BBC News. Israel’s Netanyahu and Gantz sign unity government deal. BBC News [Internet]. Aug 16 [cited 2025 Nov 30] (2019). Available from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-52358479.

  40. Akehurst L. Has Merav Michaeli rescued the Israeli Labor Party? We’ll find out in March. LabourList. Feb 04 (2021). Available from: https://labourlist.org/2021/02/has-merav-michaeli-rescued-the-israeli-labor-party-well-find-out-in-march/.

  41. Hasson, U. et al. Shared and idiosyncratic cortical activation patterns in autism revealed under continuous real-life viewing conditions. Autism Res. 2, 220–231 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schmälzle, R., Imhof, M. A., Grall, C., Flaisch, T. & Schupp, H. T. Reliability of fMRI time series: similarity of neural processing during movie viewing. Biorxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/158188 (2017).

  43. Knutson, B., Adams, C. M., Fong, G. W. & Hommer, D. Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. J. Neurosci. 21, RC159 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Andrews, T. J., Smith, R. K., Hoggart, R. L., Ulrich, P. I. & Gouws, A. D. Neural correlates of group bias during natural viewing. Cereb. Cortex 29, 3380–3389 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kobo, O., Yeshurun, Y. & Schonberg, T. Reward-related regions play a role in natural story comprehension. Iscience 27 (2024).

  46. Phelps, E. A. Emotion and cognition: insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 27–53 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tusche, A., Kahnt, T., Wisniewski, D. & Haynes, J. D. Automatic processing of political preferences in the human brain. Neuroimage 72, 174–182 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Knutson, K. M., Wood, J. N., Spampinato, M. V. & Grafman, J. Politics on the brain: an FMRI investigation. Soc. Neurosci. 1, 25–40 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  49. de Bruin, D., van Baar, J. M., Rodríguez, P. L. & FeldmanHall, O. Shared neural representations and temporal segmentation of political content predict ideological similarity. Sci. Adv. 9, eabq5920 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Moscovitch, M., Cabeza, R., Winocur, G. & Nadel, L. Episodic memory and beyond: the hippocampus and neocortex in transformation. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67, 105–134 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Voss, J. L., Bridge, D. J., Cohen, N. J. & Walker, J. A. A closer look at the hippocampus and memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 577–588 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chen, J. et al. Accessing real-life episodic information from minutes versus hours earlier modulates hippocampal and high-order cortical dynamics. Cereb. Cortex 26, 3428–3441 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sheldon, S. & Levine, B. The role of the hippocampus in memory and mental construction. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1369, 76–92 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Schafer, M. & Schiller, D. Navigating social space. Neuron 100, 476–489 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Welborn, B. L., Dieffenbach, M. C. & Lieberman, M. D. Default egocentrism: an MVPA approach to overlap in own and others’ socio-political attitudes. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 18, nsad028 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Yeshurun, Y., Nguyen, M. & Hasson, U. The default mode network: where the idiosyncratic self meets the shared social world. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 22, 181–192 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Honey, C. J., Thompson, C. R., Lerner, Y. & Hasson, U. Not lost in translation: neural responses shared across languages. J. Neurosci. 32, 15277–15283 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Regev, M., Honey, C. J., Simony, E. & Hasson, U. Selective and invariant neural responses to spoken and written narratives. J. Neurosci. 33, 15978–15988 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chen, J. et al. Shared memories reveal shared structure in neural activity across individuals. Nat. Neurosci. 20, 115–125 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zadbood, A., Chen, J., Leong, Y. C., Norman, K. A. & Hasson, U. How we transmit memories to other brains: constructing shared neural representations via communication. Cereb. Cortex 27, 4988–5000 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Baldassano, C., Hasson, U. & Norman, K. A. Representation of real-world event schemas during narrative perception. J. Neurosci. 38, 9689–9699 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bruneau, E. G. & Saxe, R. Attitudes towards the outgroup are predicted by activity in the precuneus in Arabs and Israelis. NeuroImage 52, 1704–1711 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Falk, E. B., Spunt, R. P. & Lieberman, M. D. Ascribing beliefs to ingroup and outgroup political candidates: neural correlates of perspective-taking, issue importance and days until the election. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 367, 731–743 (2012).

  64. Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N. & Banaji, M. R. Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron 50, 655–663 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Morrison, S., Decety, J. & Molenberghs, P. The neuroscience of group membership. Neuropsychologia 50, 2114–2120 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Rilling, J. K., Dagenais, J. E., Goldsmith, D. R., Glenn, A. L. & Pagnoni, G. Social cognitive neural networks during in-group and out-group interactions. Neuroimage 41, 1447–1461 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Amodio, D. M. The neuroscience of prejudice and stereotyping. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 670–682 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kaplan, J. T., Freedman, J. & Iacoboni, M. Us versus them: Political attitudes and party affiliation influence neural response to faces of presidential candidates. Neuropsychologia 45, 55–64 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Kaplan, J. T., Gimbel, S. I. & Harris, S. Neural correlates of maintaining one’s political beliefs in the face of counterevidence. Sci. Rep. 6, 39589 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Cikara, M. & Van Bavel, J. J. The neuroscience of intergroup relations: An integrative review. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 9, 245–274 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Saarinen, A. et al. Neural basis of in-group bias and prejudices: a systematic meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 131, 1214–1227 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Molenberghs, P. & Louis, W. R. Insights from fMRI studies into ingroup bias. Front. Psychol. 9, 1–12 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Hart, A. J. et al. Differential response in the human amygdala to racial outgroup vs ingroup face stimuli. Neuroreport 11, 2351–2354 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Phelps, E. A. et al. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 729–738 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Cunningham, W. A. et al. Separable neural components in the processing of black and white faces. Psychol. Sci. 15, 806–813 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Van Bavel, J. J., Packer, D. J. & Cunningham, W. A. The neural substrates of in-group bias: A functional magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Psychol. Sci. 19, 1131–1139 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Beer, J. S. et al. The Quadruple Process model approach to examining the neural underpinnings of prejudice. NeuroImage 43, 775–783 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D. & Singer, T. Neural responses to ingroup and outgroup members’ suffering predict individual differences in costly helping. Neuron 68, 149–160 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Jost, J. T., Noorbaloochi, S. & Van Bavel, J. J. The “chicken-and-egg” problem in political neuroscience. Behav. Brain Sci. 37 (2014).

  80. YeYaLab. Political-Identity-Change. GitHub (2025). https://github.com/YeYaLab/Political-Identity-Change.

  81. Boiman, G., Ohad, T., Zvi, Y., Katabi, N. & Yeshurun, Y. Neural correlates of political attitudes identity change: a longitudinal fMRI study. Zenodo https://github.com/YeYaLab/Political-Identity-Change.git (2025).

  82. NeuroVault collection 19578. Neural correlates of political identity change: a longitudinal fMRI study (2025). https://identifiers.org/neurovault.collection:19578.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Israel Science Foundation (388\24) for funding this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. The authors thank Shahar Dishon for generating illustrations for Fig.1.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Gal Boiman, Tal Ohad.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Gal Boiman, Tal Ohad, Yohay Zvi, Noa Katabi & Yaara Yeshurun

  2. The School of Psychological Sceinces, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Yaara Yeshurun

Authors
  1. Gal Boiman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tal Ohad
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yohay Zvi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Noa Katabi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yaara Yeshurun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.B.—methodology, analysis, investigation, writing, project administration; T.O.—methodology, analysis, investigation, writing; Y.Z.—data curation, methodology; N.K.—data curation, methodology, Y.Y.—conceptualization, methodology, writing, funding, supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaara Yeshurun.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Psychology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Hannah Nam and Troby Ka-Yan Lui. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file

Supplementry materials

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boiman, G., Ohad, T., Zvi, Y. et al. Changes in political attitudes are associated with changes in neural responses to political content. Commun Psychol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00395-x

Download citation

  • Received: 25 March 2025

  • Accepted: 05 January 2026

  • Published: 26 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00395-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Open Access
  • Journal Metrics
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Conferences
  • Editorial Values Statement

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Psychology (Commun Psychol)

ISSN 2731-9121 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing