Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Psychology
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications psychology
  3. articles
  4. article
Retention and transformation of internal experiences in autobiographical memory narratives
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 17 February 2026

Retention and transformation of internal experiences in autobiographical memory narratives

  • Haowen Su1 na1,
  • Mengting Zhang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3153-54141 na1,
  • Coralie Knight1,
  • Mengqi Zhao1 &
  • …
  • Hongmi Lee  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8023-07271 

Communications Psychology , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Human behaviour

Abstract

Real-world memories often include our internal thoughts and feelings, yet memory research has largely centered on experimentally controlled external stimuli. As a result, it remains underexplored how such internal experiences are preserved or transformed in naturalistic autobiographical recall, and whether they serve functional roles. To address this gap, we analyzed a large-scale dataset of autobiographical narratives in which 210 crowdsourced participants recalled a specific memorable life event twice, several weeks apart, and rated their memories along multiple dimensions. We combined manual annotation with natural language processing to identify and analyze individual memory details, categorized as either observable external experiences or subjective internal experiences. We found that internal experiences were more prone to omission and semantic distortion over time compared to external ones. However, those with higher emotional intensity and stronger semantic connections to external event features were more likely to be retained. Memories richer in internal experiences were also judged as more important, and semantically precise reinstatement of internal experiences across recalls predicted increased importance over time. Together, these findings show that although memories of internal thoughts and feelings are relatively fragile, they nonetheless play a meaningful role in shaping the subjective significance of autobiographical memory.

Data availability

The original Hippocorpus dataset45 is publicly available on the Microsoft website (https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=105291). A preprocessed version of the subset used in the current study is publicly available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/a65bg).

Code availability

The analyses in this study were conducted using publicly available Python and R packages. For text similarity analysis, we used a pretrained model (all-mpnet-base-v2) implemented in Sentence Transformers (v2.2.0). For sentiment analysis, we used the VADER sentiment analysis tool implemented in the NLTK library (v3.8.1). We used the lme4 (v1.1-35.5) package to perform mixed-effects logistic regression, psych (v2.5.6) to compute Williams tests, cocor (v1.1.4) to obtain confidence intervals and Cohen’s q for correlation comparisons, irr (v0.84.1) to estimate Fleiss’s κ, and MBESS (v4.9.42) to compute confidence intervals for ANOVA effect sizes in R. For other statistical tests, we used Pingouin (v0.5.1), Scipy (v1.12.0), and Scikit-learn (v1.2.2) in Python. Analysis scripts are publicly available on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/a65bg).

References

  1. Levine, L. J., Lench, H. C. & Safer, M. A. Functions of remembering and misremembering emotion. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 23, 1059–1075 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ingvar, D. H. Memory of the future’: an essay on the temporal organization of conscious awareness. Hum. Neurobiol. 4, 127–136 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conway, M. A. Memory and the self. J. Mem. Lang. 53, 594–628 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barker, C., Elliott, R. & Pistrang, N. Research Methods in Clinical Psychology: An Introduction for Students and Practitioners. (Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex, England, 2016).

  5. Stawarczyk, D., Jeunehomme, O. & D’Argembeau, A. Differential contributions of default and dorsal attention networks to remembering thoughts and external stimuli from real-life events. Cereb. Cortex 28, 4023–4035 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fenerci, C., Adjei, B. & Sheldon, S. Remembering what we imagine: the role of event schemas in shaping how imagined autobiographical events are recalled. Learn. Mem. 31, a053993 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fenerci, C. & Sheldon, S. The role of episodic memory in imagining autobiographical events: the influence of event expectancy and context familiarity. Memory 30, 573–590 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Szpunar, K. K., Addis, D. R. & Schacter, D. L. Memory for Emotional Simulations: Remembering a Rosy Future. Psychol. Sci. 23, 24–29 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Brigard, F., Gessell, B., Yang, B. W., Stewart, G. & Marsh, E. J. Remembering possible times: Memory for details of past, future, and counterfactual simulations. Psychol. Conscious. Theory Res. Pract. 7, 331–339 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. McLelland, V. C., Devitt, A. L., Schacter, D. L. & Addis, D. R. Making the future memorable: the phenomenology of remembered future events. Memory 23, 1255–1263 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, M. K. & Raye, C. L. Reality monitoring. Psychol. Rev. 88, 67–85 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Suengas, A. G. & Johnson, M. K. Qualitative effects of rehearsal on memories for perceived and imagined complex events. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 117, 377–389 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morales-Torres, R., Miceli, K., Huang, S., Szpunar, K. & De Brigard, F. Episodic details are better remembered in plausible relative to implausible counterfactual simulations. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 32, 1852–1859 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Mulukom, V., Schacter, D. L., Corballis, M. C. & Addis, D. R. The degree of disparateness of event details modulates future simulation construction, plausibility, and recall. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 69, 234–242 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jeunehomme, O. & D’Argembeau, A. Accessibility and characteristics of memories of the future. Memory 25, 666–676 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jeunehomme, O. & D’Argembeau, A. The role of self-reference and personal goals in the formation of memories of the future. Mem. Cogn. 49, 1119–1135 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Diamond, N. B., Abdi, H. & Levine, B. Different patterns of recollection for matched real-world and laboratory-based episodes in younger and older adults. Cognition 202, 104309 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Diamond, N. B., Armson, M. J. & Levine, B. The truth is out there: accuracy in recall of verifiable real-world events. Psychol. Sci. 31, 1544–1556 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pooja, R., Ghosh, P. & Sreekumar, V. Towards an ecologically valid naturalistic cognitive neuroscience of memory and event cognition. Neuropsychologia 203, 108970 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G. & Raye, C. L. Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 117, 371–376 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brewer, W. F. Memory for randomly sampled autobiographical events. in Remembering Reconsidered: Ecological and Traditional Approaches to the Study of Memory (eds Winograd, E. & Neisser, U.) 21–90 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664014.004.

  22. Conway, M. A., Collins, A. F., Gathercole, S. E. & Anderson, S. J. Recollections of true and false autobiographical memories. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 125, 69–95 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Finley, J. R. & Brewer, W. F. Accuracy and completeness of autobiographical memory: evidence from a wearable camera study. Memory 32, 1012–1042 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hirst, W. et al. Long-term memory for the terrorist attack of September 11: Flashbulb memories, event memories, and the factors that influence their retention. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 138, 161–176 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidt, S., Muzzulini, B., Levine, L. J. & Tinti, C. Sources of bias in memory for emotional reactions to Brexit: current feelings mediate the link between appraisals and memories. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 35, 819–827 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kredlow, M. A. et al. Emotion language use in narratives of the 9/11 attacks predicts long-term memory. Emotion 24, 808–819 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Levine, L. J. et al. Remembering facts versus feelings in the wake of political events. Cogn. Emot. 35, 936–955 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stawarczyk, D. & D’Argembeau, A. The dynamics of memory retrieval for internal mentation. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–13 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wardell, V. & Palombo, D. J. Stability and malleability of emotional autobiographical memories. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 3, 393–406 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wardell, V., Jameson, T., St. Jacques, P. L., Madan, C. R. & Palombo, D. J. Assessing autobiographical memory consistency: machine and human approaches. Behav. Res. Methods 57, 163 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Safer, M. A., Bonanno, G. A. & Field, N. P. ‘It was never that bad’: biased recall of grief and long-term adjustment to the death of a spouse. Memory 9, 195–203 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Castillo, J. et al. Overestimating the intensity of negative feelings in autobiographical memory: evidence from the 9/11 attack and COVID-19 pandemic. Cogn. Emot. 38, 1048–1063 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Levine, L. J. & Safer, M. A. Sources of bias in memory for emotions. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11, 169–173 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lee, H., Bellana, B. & Chen, J. What can narratives tell us about the neural bases of human memory? Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 32, 111–119 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Palombo, D. J. Beyond memory: the transcendence of episodic narratives. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. Rev. Can. Psychol. Exp. 78, 155–162 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rubin, D. C. & Greenberg, D. L. The role of narrative in recollection: A view from cognitive psychology and neuropsychology. in Narrative and Consciousness: Literature, Psychology, and the Brain 53–85 (Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195140057.003.0004.

  37. Nelson, K. & Fivush, R. The development of autobiographical memory, autobiographical narratives, and autobiographical consciousness. Psychol. Rep. 123, 71–96 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Habermas, T. & Bluck, S. Getting a life: the emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychol. Bull. 126, 748–769 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Levine, B., Svoboda, E., Hay, J. F., Winocur, G. & Moscovitch, M. Aging and autobiographical memory: dissociating episodic from semantic retrieval. Psychol. Aging 17, 677–689 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wardell, V. & Palombo, D. J. Negative emotion reduces autobiographical memory’s susceptibility to change. Emotion https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0001600 (2025).

  41. Rubin, D. C. The coherence of memories for trauma: evidence from posttraumatic stress disorder. Conscious. Cogn. 20, 857–865 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Habermas, T. & Berger, N. Retelling everyday emotional events: condensation, distancing, and closure. Cogn. Emot. 25, 206–219 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sap, M., Horvitz, E., Choi, Y., Smith, N. A. & Pennebaker, J. Recollection versus imagination: exploring human memory and cognition via neural language models. in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 1970–1978 (Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.178.

  44. Sap, M. et al. Quantifying the narrative flow of imagined versus autobiographical stories. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2211715119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sap, M., Horvitz, E., Choi, Y., Smith, N. A. & Pennebaker, J. W. Hippocorpus v3.0. Microsoft Download Center https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=105291 (2024).

  46. Fenerci, C., Cheng, Z., Addis, D. R., Bellana, B. & Sheldon, S. Studying memory narratives with natural language processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 29, 516–525 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Feuerriegel, S. et al. Using natural language processing to analyse text data in behavioural science. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 4, 96–111 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Holland, A. C. & Kensinger, E. A. Emotion and autobiographical memory. Phys. Life Rev. 7, 88–131 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wardell, V. et al. How emotion influences the details recalled in autobiographical memory. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 35, 1454–1465 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Craik, F. I. M. & Tulving, E. Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 104, 268–294 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hargreaves, I. S., Pexman, P. M., Johnson, J. S. & Zdrazilova, L. Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 73 (2012).

  52. Lee, H. & Chen, J. Predicting memory from the network structure of naturalistic events. Nat. Commun. 13, 4235 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Walker, I. & Hulme, C. Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25, 1256–1271 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Irish, M., Lawlor, B. A., O′Mara, S. M. & Coen, R. F. Assessment of behavioural markers of autonoetic consciousness during episodic autobiographical memory retrieval: a preliminary analysis. Behav. Neurol. 19, 691925 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Thomsen, D. K. et al. A 3.5 year diary study: remembering and life story importance are predicted by different event characteristics. Conscious. Cogn. 36, 180–195 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Rubin, D. C., Schrauf, R. W. & Greenberg, D. L. Belief and recollection of autobiographical memories. Mem. Cogn. 31, 887–901 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hirst, W. et al. A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of September 11, 2001: flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 604–623 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Trabasso, T. & van den Broek, P. Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. J. Mem. Lang. 24, 612–630 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Georgiou, A., Can, T., Katkov, M. & Tsodyks, M. Using large language models to study human memory for meaningful narratives. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.03.565484 (2023).

  60. Reimers, N. & Gurevych, I. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1908.10084 (2019).

  61. St. Jacques, P. L. & Levine, B. Ageing and autobiographical memory for emotional and neutral events. Memory 15, 129–144 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hutto, C. & Gilbert, E. VADER: a parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media 8, 216–225 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Campbell, Nadel, J., Lynn, Duke, Devin, & & Ryan, L. Remembering all that and then some: recollection of autobiographical memories after a 1-year delay. Memory 19, 406–415 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Talarico, J. M., LaBar, K. S. & Rubin, D. C. Emotional intensity predicts autobiographical memory experience. Mem. Cogn. 32, 1118–1132 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Larsen, S. F. & Conway, M. A. Reconstructing dates of true and false autobiographical memories. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 259–272 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Robinson, M. D. & Clore, G. L. Belief and feeling: evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report. Psychol. Bull. 128, 934–960 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Zajonc, R. B. Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. Am. Psychol. 35, 151–175 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  68. LeDoux, J. E. The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. (Simon and Schuster, 1996).

  69. Kensinger, E. A. Remembering Emotional Experiences: The Contribution of Valence and Arousal. Rev. Neurosci. 15, 241–251 (2004).

  70. McGaugh, J. L. Making lasting memories: remembering the significant. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 10402–10407 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Yonelinas, A. P. & Ritchey, M. The slow forgetting of emotional episodic memories: an emotional binding account. Trends Cogn. Sci. 19, 259–267 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Howard, M. W. & Kahana, M. J. A distributed representation of temporal context. J. Math. Psychol. 46, 269–299 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A. & Kahana, M. J. A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychol. Rev. 116, 129–156 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Gilboa, A. & Marlatte, H. Neurobiology of schemas and schema-mediated memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 21, 618–631 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Kensinger, E. A. & Ford, J. H. Retrieval of emotional events from memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 71, 251–272 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wilson, T. D. & Gilbert, D. T. Explaining away: a model of affective adaptation. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3, 370–386 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Buchanan, T. W. Retrieval of emotional memories. Psychol. Bull. 133, 761 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Conway, M. A. & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychol. Rev. 107, 261 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Bluck, S., Alea, N., Habermas, T. & Rubin, D. C. A TALE of three functions: the self–reported uses of autobiographical memory. Soc. Cogn. 23, 91–117 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Fivush, R., Booker, J. A. & Graci, M. E. Ongoing narrative meaning-making within events and across the life span. Imagin. Cogn. Personal. 37, 127–152 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Pillemer, D. B. Momentous events and the life story. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 5, 123–134 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Fivush, R., McDermott Sales, J. & Bohanek, J. G. Meaning making in mothers’ and children’s narratives of emotional events. Memory 16, 579–594 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Habermas, T. Emotion and Narrative: Perspectives in Autobiographical Storytelling. (Cambridge University Press, 2019).

  84. Pratt, J. G. et al. Positive affect amplifies integration within episodic memories in the laboratory and the real world. Learn. Mem. 32, a053971 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Mahr, J. B. & Csibra, G. Why do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory. Behav. Brain Sci. 41, e1 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Marsh, E. J. Retelling is not the same as recalling: implications for memory. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16, 16–20 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Dudukovic, N. M., Marsh, E. J. & Tversky, B. Telling a story or telling it straight: the effects of entertaining versus accurate retellings on memory. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 18, 125–143 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Hyman, J. R. I. E. Conversational remembering: story recall with a peer versus for an experimenter. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 8, 49–66 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Booker, J. A. et al. Longitudinal changes in trauma narratives over the first year and associations with coping and mental health. J. Affect. Disord. 272, 116–124 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Boals, A. & Klein, K. Word use in emotional narratives about failed romantic relationships and subsequent mental health. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 24, 252–268 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Vanaken, L. et al. It’s all in the details: an investigation of the subcomponents of narrative coherence in relation to mental health. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 35, 1273–1283 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Yoolim Hong, Alyssa McMahon, and Taylor Korn for their assistance with preprocessing the recall narrative data.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Haowen Su, Mengting Zhang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA

    Haowen Su, Mengting Zhang, Coralie Knight, Mengqi Zhao & Hongmi Lee

Authors
  1. Haowen Su
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mengting Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Coralie Knight
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mengqi Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hongmi Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.L. conceived and designed the research. C.K. preprocessed the data. H.S., M. Zhang, and H.L. analyzed the data. H.S., M. Zhang, C.K., and H.L. wrote the original paper. H.S., M. Zhang, M. Zhao, and H.L. reviewed and edited the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongmi Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Psychology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Jesse Rissman and Troby Ka-Yan Lui. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review file

Supplementary information

Reporting summary

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, H., Zhang, M., Knight, C. et al. Retention and transformation of internal experiences in autobiographical memory narratives. Commun Psychol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00425-8

Download citation

  • Received: 03 September 2025

  • Accepted: 06 February 2026

  • Published: 17 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00425-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Open Access
  • Journal Metrics
  • Calls for Papers
  • Referees
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Conferences
  • Editorial Values Statement

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Psychology (Commun Psychol)

ISSN 2731-9121 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing