Abstract
Nano-/micro-plastics (NMPs, diameter <5 mm) pose significant risks to human health, ecosystems, and the global material cycle. Pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry is an essential technique for accurate NMPs detection. This comment highlights the importance of sample preparation, pyrolysis methods, and data processing. We propose four recommendations for assay standardization: solubility-based standard curves, scalable pyrolysis, quantitative product selection, and AI-assisted data analysis, ensuring reliable data and advancing research on NMPs.
Similar content being viewed by others
The environmental behaviors and health risks posed by microplastics (MPs, 1 μm–5 mm) and nanoplastics (NPs, <1000 nm) have emerged as the most pressing issues in environmental science. As research continues to unfold, it has become increasingly evident that these tiny pollutants not only pose threats to human health, ecosystems, and biodiversity but also have the potential to alter the global material cycle profoundly1,2. Due to the variety of shapes, chemical properties, and wide particle size range of nano-/micro-plastics (NMPs), the new particulate pollutant has presented significant challenges to traditional detection methods for small molecule organic contaminants. In recent years, scientists have navigated these challenges by integrating insights from diverse disciplines (materials science, biology, chemistry, etc.) into developing advanced detection technologies tailored to NMPs’ unique physicochemical properties3,4,5. However, the real sample analysis often encounters challenges due to the complex environmental matrices, which can lead to false positives or negatives, alongside increased instrument failure rates and maintenance costs6.
Pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (Py-GC-MS) has gained significant recognition in the environmental science community for its ability to provide direct mass concentration measurements, unaffected by NMPs’ size limitations, and its strong resistance to interferences7,8. Compared with optical spectrum techniques, Py-GC-MS has revolutionized our ability to identify NMP types and quantify their presence in human tissue and environmental samples9,10,11,12. Recent findings reveal that NMPs, especially at the nanoscale, can penetrate biological barriers, reaching the arteries, bone marrow, and other human tissues13,14,15. Small-sized NMPs in environmental samples, such as in PM2.5 and PM10, pose a serious threat to human health10,16, further challenging the detection capabilities of techniques other than Py-GC-MS. Meanwhile, Py-GC-MS can directly provide the mass concentration in the target samples, thereby eliminating the uncertainty associated with the process of converting quantitative concentrations17. Overall, Py-GC-MS has demonstrated remarkable advantages in the NMPs screening phase, particularly in the detection of low-concentration and small-sized NMPs, as well as in the analysis of complex sample matrices. Addressing NMP pollution is a pressing global concern, underlining the urgent necessity for standardized monitoring protocols. Establishing these standards will enable us to produce comparable data, furthering our understanding of NMPs’ role in the global material cycle and their broader ecological impacts.
The development of NMP detection via Py-GC-MS has reached a stage where the core detection principles remain consistent, although the specific methods vary slightly. In the helium atmosphere of 600 ± 50 °C, polymers undergo thermal cleavage into various low molecular weight products (<500 m/z) within seconds9,10,18. Importantly, under the same stable conditions, these pyrolysis products maintain a consistent linear relationship with the quantity of the polymer. This relationship is crucial for employing Py-GC-MS in the quantitative analysis of NMPs in environmental samples10,12. Thus, we propose guiding principles for future Py-GC-MS-based NMP detection efforts, which focus on preparing compliant samples and establishing Py-GC-MS analytical protocols.
As illustrated in Fig. 1, the Py-GC-MS-based NMPs analysis process (PNAP) of environmental samples is divided into two main stages: sample preparation and Py-GC-MS analysis. To address commonly shared environmental concerns, samples can be categorized based on their state of matter and matrix characteristics into water, soil, atmosphere, and biological samples (including human tissue samples)10,12,19,20,21. Each of these types requires specific sample pre-treatment processes to meet the detection requirements of Py-GC-MS analysis. Direct analysis is feasible for atmospheric samples, which often have low matrix content10; however, using non-plastic materials, such as sampling membranes or tubing, during sampling to prevent contamination is crucial. Soil samples, especially those collected from agricultural or forested regions, are abundant in organic matter that must be thoroughly digested and removed12. This step is crucial because the presence of organic material can interfere with the detection of pyrolysis products and quantitative ions. Additionally, it poses a risk of contaminating the pyrolizer and ion source of Py-GC-MS, which can result in increased uncertainty in measurements and elevated equipment maintenance costs12. Similarly, seawater and coastal sediment samples contain significant amounts of inorganic salts that must be thoroughly removed22. Due to the considerable concern over the potential health risks posed by NMPs, removing organic molecules such as proteins and lipids from biological samples is a prerequisite for accurately quantifying NMPs5,21. In PNAP, achieving maximized extraction efficiency of target NMPs polymers necessitates systematic elimination of three predominant interfering agents: (1) chemical homologs inducing spectral overlap through structural analogies, (2) ionic species causing detector saturation via charge-shielding effects, and (3) natural biopolymers altering pyrolysis kinetics through competitive matrix interactions.
Given the varying research objectives, the inherent heterogeneity of samples, and the challenges in standardizing procedures, it is essential to focus on the rationality and stability of sampling and pre-treatment methods. As polymorphic emerging contaminants, NMPs exhibit complex physicochemical profiles spanning multiple dimensions and surface functionalities. Current methodological approaches for particulate NMP isolation demonstrate concerning operational variability across laboratories, with extraction efficiencies fluctuating by 7–116%, meanwhile depending on matrix complexity (soil, aqueous vs. human tissue systems)21,23,24,25. Ensuring these aspects are logical, stable, and operational is crucial. However, NMP measurements using Py-GC-MS should be standardized to enhance data comparability across different studies. To achieve this, we propose four recommendations:
-
(1)
“Dissolve” instead of “Disperse” for the calibration curve: the weighing method and solvent dispersion method (water or ethanol) for calibrating the standard curve of NMPs present several issues21,26,27, including complex procedures, poor linearity, and a high limit of quantification. Utilize organic solvents to dissolve plastics into polymer solutions and conduct gradient dilutions to create standard curves, significantly reducing complexity and operational costs21. The solvent selection will be guided by established practices in the polymer field28. For polymers that present challenging dissolution conditions, it is preferable to use nano-sized NMPs suspended in water or ethanol for gradient dilution. The smaller size allows for more precise control over the mass concentration of NMPs.
-
(2)
Developing the scalability of pyrolysis methods based on Py-GC-MS: implementing thermal desorption at 300 °C before pyrolysis can effectively eliminate residual small molecule interferences, thus improving data quality. Certainly, thermal desorption can also be employed as a complementary technique for measuring volatile organic pollutants in the sample, such as plastic additives, thereby enhancing the overall efficiency of the detection10. For thermally unstable polymers, such as degradable plastics, reducing the desorption temperature and time is important to ensure proper recovery of the target polymers25. Moreover, under real environmental conditions, biodegradation or combustion processes cause plastic polymers to form more stable small molecules, akin to cracking products29,30. Consequently, GC-MS may be unable to differentiate some of these small molecules further. Therefore, the combination of thermal desorption and co-identification of multiple pyrolysis products is necessary to characterize the plastic polymers effectively12. It is noteworthy that analyzing the same sample not only with a “double-shot” but also with a “multi-shot” approach, based on the thermal behavior of the products at varying temperatures, maybe a prudent choice10,31.
-
(3)
Standardized criteria for quantitative product screening: NMPs typically yield multiple pyrolysis products10,12,32, as shown in the Py-GC-MS Analysis part of Fig. 1. The most characteristic pyrolysis products, with nearly 100% recovery as possible, should be used for quantification, while other pyrolysis products serve as qualitative references. One quantitative ion and two/three qualitative ions should correspond to the characteristic ions of the distinct fragments, avoiding common fragments like aromatic hydrocarbons and benzene rings. Low molecular weight fragments are often susceptible to matrix interference and should be carefully selected. Notably, the screening principles outlined above apply not only to conventional plastics, such as polyethylene, polyvinyl chloride, and polystyrene, but also to degradable plastics, including polylactic acid, polyhydroxy alkanoic acid, and polybutylene succinate10,25. It is crucial to highlight that optimizing the pyrolysis conditions is essential for both categories of plastics to ensure reliable and reproducible results in Py-GC-MS analyses. This optimization process involves carefully controlling factors such as pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, and residence time to achieve accurate characterization of NMPs.
-
(4)
Optimizing data processing methods to apply to more polymer analysis: multivariate statistics, machine learning, and deep learning can be effectively integrated into the process of data analysis of Py-GC-MS, playing a crucial role in improving both the quality and accuracy of the results33. For each plastic polymer, the presence of multiple pyrolysis products and characteristic ions shapes the data obtained from Py-GC-MS analysis. It is essential to fully leverage this information to improve automated, standardized, and high-throughput data processing procedures. Furthermore, tackling the removal of complex matrix background interference remains a significant challenge in the quantification of NMPs using this technique. Specifically, combining chemical fingerprint information of polymers based on Py-GC-MS, artificial intelligence (AI) is instrumental in addressing challenges such as environmental matrix interference and mutual interference among target polymer pyrolysis products33. Additionally, it enhances the sorting and identification of quantitative and qualitative ions, thereby streamlining the overall data processing workflow and ensuring more reliable outcomes.
Py-GC-MS has undeniably become the “star” technology for NMP measurements. However, it still presents a significant “barrier to entry” for many research groups aiming to investigate the environmental behaviors of NMPs via this method. This emerging particulate pollutant, unlike traditional pollutants, possesses unique characteristics that affect both sample pre-treatment and instrumental testing processes. For instance, the preparation of standard curves, optimization of pyrolysis conditions, selection of pyrolysis products, and identification of quantitative ions of NMPs constitute a systematic endeavor. Consequently, researchers are navigating this complex landscape incrementally, akin to crossing a river by feeling for stones. Several early exploratory studies utilizing Py-GC-MS for the detection of NMPs demonstrated significant objective shortcomings concerning the environmental behaviors and research needs related to NMPs. Additionally, specific issues identified in these initial studies continue to persist in current research efforts. Therefore, during this crucial phase in developing NMP detection technology via Py-GC-MS, we strongly advocate for the gradual harmonization of standards for its usage and the principles governing data comparison. As emphasized previously, the standardization and stability of the methodology are paramount for achieving credible and comprehensive insights across the entire NMP analysis process. This encompasses all stages, from sample collection and pre-treatment to Py-GC-MS analysis. Such rigorous methodological practices ensure both the reliability of the results and their accurate interpretation, thereby advancing our understanding of NMP contamination and its environmental impact. This initiative represents a pivotal step forward in addressing the pressing environmental challenge of NMPs, highlighting the importance of continued research and global collaboration.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Huang, W. & Xia, X. Element cycling with micro(nano)plastics. Science 385, 933–935 (2024).
Thompson, R. C. et al. Twenty years of microplastic pollution research—what have we learned? Science 386, eadl2746 (2024).
Jing, S. et al. Size-classifiable quantification of nanoplastic by rate zonal centrifugation coupled with pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1314, 342752 (2024).
Zhang, J. et al. Identification of poly(ethylene terephthalate) nanoplastics in commercially bottled drinking water using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 8365–8372 (2023).
Zhou, X.-X. et al. Quantitative analysis of polystyrene and poly(methyl methacrylate) nanoplastics in tissues of aquatic animals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 3032–3040 (2021).
Pérez-Guevara, F., Roy, P. D., Kutralam-Muniasamy, G. & Shruti, V. C. Coverage of microplastic data underreporting and progress toward standardization. Sci. Total Environ. 829, 154727 (2022).
Picó, Y. & Barceló, D. Pyrolysis gas chromatography-mass spectrometry in environmental analysis: focus on organic matter and microplastics. Trends Anal. Chem 130, 115964 (2020).
Cai, M. et al. Current status and emerging techniques for sampling, separating, and identifying microplastics in freshwater environments. Trends Anal. Chem. 184, 118151 (2025).
Zhou, X.-X. et al. Protein corona-mediated extraction for quantitative analysis of nanoplastics in environmental waters by pyrolysis gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 93, 6698–6705 (2021).
Chen, Y. et al. Quantification and characterization of fine plastic particles as considerable components in atmospheric fine particles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 4691–4703 (2024).
Kumar, V. et al. Origin, ecotoxicity, and analytical methods for microplastic detection in aquatic systems. Trends Anal. Chem. 170, 117392 (2024).
Wang, Y. et al. Soil erosion is a major drive for nano & micro-plastics to enter riverine systems from cultivated land. Water Res. 256, 121597 (2024).
Guo, X. et al. Discovery and analysis of microplastics in human bone marrow. J. Hazard. Mater. 477, 135266 (2024).
Liu, S. et al. Microplastics in three types of human arteries detected by pyrolysis-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (Py-GC/MS). J. Hazard. Mater. 469, 133855 (2024).
Magrì, D. et al. Laser ablation as a versatile tool to mimic polyethylene terephthalate nanoplastic pollutants: characterization and toxicology assessment. ACS Nano 12, 7690–7700 (2018).
Vethaak, A. D. & Legler, J. Microplastics and human health. Science 371, 672–674 (2021).
Chen, Q. et al. Rapid mass conversion for environmental microplastics of diverse shapes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 10776–10785 (2024).
Wang, Y., Hou, P., Liu, K., Hayat, K. & Liu, W. Depth distribution of nano- and microplastics and their contribution to carbon storage in Chinese agricultural soils. Sci. Total Environ. 913, 169709 (2024).
Li, P. & Liu, J. Micro(nano)plastics in the human body: sources, occurrences, fates, and health risks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 58, 3065–3078 (2024).
Elkhatib, D. & Oyanedel-Craver, V. A critical review of extraction and identification methods of microplastics in wastewater and drinking water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 7037–7049 (2020).
Rauert, C. et al. Assessing the efficacy of pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry for nanoplastic and microplastic analysis in human blood. Environ. Sci. Technol. 59, 1984–1994 (2025).
Zhang, Y. et al. Mass concentrations, compositions and burial fluxes of nano- and micro-plastics in a multi-species saltmarsh. Environ. Pollut. 363, 125181 (2024).
Li, P. et al. Extraction of common small microplastics and nanoplastics embedded in environmental solid matrices by tetramethylammonium hydroxide digestion and dichloromethane dissolution for Py-GC-MS determination. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 12010–12018 (2023).
Xu, Y., Ou, Q., Jiao, M., Liu, G. & van der Hoek, J. P. Identification and quantification of nanoplastics in surface water and groundwater by pyrolysis gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 4988–4997 (2022).
Okoffo, E. D., Chan, C. M., Rauert, C., Kaserzon, S. & Thomas, K. V. Identification and quantification of micro-bioplastics in environmental samples by pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 13774–13785 (2022).
Fischer, M. & Scholz-Böttcher, B. M. Simultaneous trace identification and quantification of common types of microplastics in environmental samples by pyrolysis-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 5052–5060 (2017).
Dibke, C., Fischer, M. & Scholz-Böttcher, B. M. Microplastic mass concentrations and distribution in German bight waters by pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry/thermochemolysis reveal potential impact of marine coatings: do ships leave skid marks? Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 2285–2295 (2021).
Zhou, P., Yu, J., Sánchez-Rivera, K. L., Huber, G. W. & Lehn, R. C. V. Large-scale computational polymer solubility predictions and applications to dissolution-based plastic recycling. Green Chem. 25, 4402–4414 (2023).
Velis, C. A. & Cook, E. Mismanagement of plastic waste through open burning with emphasis on the Global South: a systematic review of risks to occupational and public health. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 7186–7207 (2021).
Simoneit, B. R. T., Medeiros, P. M. & Didyk, B. M. Combustion products of plastics as indicators for refuse burning in the atmosphere. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 6961–6970 (2005).
Evans, K. S., Baqer, D., Mafina, M.-K. & Al-Sid-Cheikh, M. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of tire wear particles (TWPs) in road dust using a novel mode of operation of TGA-GC/MS. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 12, 79–84 (2025).
Jing, S. et al. Non-destructive extraction and separation of nano- and microplastics from environmental samples by density gradient ultracentrifugation. Anal. Chem. 94, 15280–15287 (2022).
Forbes, T. P., Pettibone, J. M., Windsor, E., Conny, J. M. & Fletcher, R. A. Rapid chemical screening of microplastics and nanoplastics by thermal desorption and pyrolysis mass spectrometry with unsupervised fuzzy clustering. Anal. Chem. 95, 12373–12382 (2023).
Acknowledgements
This work is funded by the Opening Project of Shanghai Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Particle Pollution and Prevention (LAP3) (No. FDLAP24018), the Research Center (RCIF) at Westlake University (No. 103110746022301, 210000006022303), and Westlake Education Foundation. We thank Xin Li (Instrumentation and Service Center for Molecular Sciences at Westlake University) and Ying Nie (from the Instrumentation and Service Center for Physical Sciences at Westlake University) for the discussion.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.J. wrote the main manuscript text, and S.J. and Y.W. prepared the figure. X.G. and T.C.W. supervised this work. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Jing, S., Wang, Y., Chen, Y. et al. Standardizing pyrolysis gas chromatography mass spectrometry for nanoplastics and microplastics detection to advance environmental research. npj Emerg. Contam. 1, 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44454-025-00001-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44454-025-00001-5



