Fig. 3: Representative sensor modalities used in SSIs. | Nature Sensors

Fig. 3: Representative sensor modalities used in SSIs.

From: Sensing technologies for silent speech interfaces

Fig. 3: Representative sensor modalities used in SSIs.The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

a–i, Schematics illustrating key sensing technologies enabling silent speech decoding, categorized by sensing principle: optical sensing (a; a smartphone-based front camera detects articulatory motion, such as lip and jaw movements); ultrasonic sensing (b; an ultrasound imaging probe beneath the jaw visualizes tongue motion in real time); IMU sensing (c; IMUs distributed at the head, lip and chin track multi-point facial kinematics during articulation); triboelectric sensing (d; self-powered wearable sensors detect facial motion through contact electrification); EMG (e; tattoo-like epidermal electrodes acquire facial myopotentials associated with silent articulation); strain sensing (f; textile strain sensors embedded in a smart choker capture throat deformation patterns); EEG (g; in-ear conformal bioelectronics measure brain activity associated with speech imagery); ECoG (h; implanted cortical arrays decode neural activity from speech-generating regions in patients with brainstem injury); and MEA (i; intracortical electrodes implanted in the motor cortex record neural activity associated with fine motor intention, enabling high-resolution decoding of attempted handwriting and speech imagery). PI, polyimmide; PVC, polyvinyl chloride. Panels adapted from: d, ref. 33, CC BY 4.0; e, ref. 36, CC BY 4.0; f, ref. 42, CC BY 4.0; g, ref. 47, CC BY 4.0.

Back to article page