Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Shigella infection is facilitated by interaction of human enteric α-defensin 5 with colonic epithelial receptor P2Y11

Abstract

Human enteric α-defensin 5 (HD5) is an immune system peptide that acts as an important antimicrobial factor but is also known to promote pathogen infections by enhancing adhesion of the pathogens. The mechanistic basis of these conflicting functions is unknown. Here we show that HD5 induces abundant filopodial extensions in epithelial cells that capture Shigella, a major human enteroinvasive pathogen that is able to exploit these filopodia for invasion, revealing a mechanism for HD5-augmented bacterial invasion. Using multi-omics screening and in vitro, organoid, dynamic gut-on-chip and in vivo models, we identify the HD5 receptor as P2Y11, a purinergic receptor distributed apically on the luminal surface of the human colonic epithelium. Inhibitor screening identified cAMP-PKA signalling as the main pathway mediating the cytoskeleton-regulating activity of HD5. In illuminating this mechanism of Shigella invasion, our findings raise the possibility of alternative intervention strategies against HD5-augmented infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: HD5 induces rapid formation of filopodia that capture Shigella in the early stage of infection.
Fig. 2: HIFE capture boosts invasion efficiency of Shigella.
Fig. 3: HD5 interacts with GPCR to induce HIFE through PKA activation.
Fig. 4: P2Y11 serves as HD5 receptor to induce HIFE.
Fig. 5: Critical residues of HD5 for interaction with P2Y11 and the distribution pattern of P2Y11 in gut-on-chip and human colonic tissue.
Fig. 6: Intervention of P2Y11 prevented the HD5-faciliated Shigella invasion.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the Article and its supplementary files. Publicly available datasets can be accessed at: HGNC (https://www.genenames.org/), Reactome v.86 (https://reactome.org/), The Human Protein Atlas 23.0 (https://www.proteinatlas.org/), Protein Data Bank (https://www.rcsb.org/), UCSC Genome Browser (https://genome.ucsc.edu/), Sequence Read Archive (SRA) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra), Genome Sequence Archive (GSA) (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/gsa/). RNA-seq data generated in this study have been deposited at the Genome Sequence Archive (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/search/specific?db=hra&q=HRA006201)82,83. Mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited with the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository, with dataset identifiers PXD057832 and PXD057885. Data for the analysis are available on GitHub84 and Zenodo85. All bacterial strains, original microscopy images and more relevant data are available from the corresponding author (K.Y., kaiye@xjtu.edu.cn) on reasonable request. Material transfer agreements may be required to distribute resources and materials generated in this study. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

All code used to generate the data in this study is available on GitHub84 and Zenodo85.

References

  1. Zasloff, M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature 415, 389–395 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ganz, T. Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3, 710–720 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ouellette, A. J. Paneth cell α-defensins in enteric innate immunity. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 68, 2215–2229 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bevins, C. L. Innate immune functions of α-defensins in the small intestine. Dig. Dis. 31, 299–304 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu, D. et al. Human enteric α-defensin 5 promotes Shigella infection by enhancing bacterial adhesion and invasion. Immunity 48, 1233–1244.e6 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, D. et al. Human enteric defensin 5 promotes Shigella infection of macrophages. Infect. Immun. 88, e00769-19 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Klotman, M. E. et al. Neisseria gonorrhoeae-induced human defensins 5 and 6 increase HIV infectivity: role in enhanced transmission. J. Immunol. 180, 6176–6185 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rapista, A. et al. Human defensins 5 and 6 enhance HIV-1 infectivity through promoting HIV attachment. Retrovirology 8, 45 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Valere, K., Lu, W. & Chang, T. L. Key determinants of human α-defensin 5 and 6 for enhancement of HIV infectivity. Viruses 9, 244 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Valere, K., Rapista, A., Eugenin, E., Lu, W. & Chang, T. L. Human alpha-defensin HNP1 increases HIV traversal of the epithelial barrier: a potential role in STI-mediated enhancement of HIV transmission. Viral Immunol. 28, 609–615 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehmann, M. J., Sherer, N. M., Marks, C. B., Pypaert, M. & Mothes, W. Actin- and myosin-driven movement of viruses along filopodia precedes their entry into cells. J. Cell Biol. 170, 317–325 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Mattila, P. K. & Lappalainen, P. Filopodia: molecular architecture and cellular functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 446–454 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Leite, F. & Way, M. The role of signalling and the cytoskeleton during Vaccinia Virus egress. Virus Res. 209, 87–99 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McCormick, B. A. Shigella gets captured to gain entry. Cell Host Microbe 9, 449–450 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schnupf, P. & Sansonetti, P. J. Shigella pathogenesis: new insights through advanced methodologies. Microbiol. Spectr. https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.bai-0023-2019 (2019).

  16. Romero, S. et al. ATP-mediated Erk1/2 activation stimulates bacterial capture by filopodia, which precedes Shigella invasion of epithelial cells. Cell Host Microbe 9, 508–519 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sunkavalli, U. et al. Analysis of host microRNA function uncovers a role for miR-29b-2-5p in Shigella capture by filopodia. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006327 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lanata, C. F. & Black, R. E. Estimating the true burden of an enteric pathogen: enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. Lancet Infect. Dis. 18, 1165–1166 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kotloff, K. L. Shigella infection in children and adults: a formidable foe. Lancet Glob. Health 5, e1166–e1167 (2017).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacquemet, G. et al. FiloQuant reveals increased filopodia density during breast cancer progression. J. Cell Biol. 216, 3387–3403 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Barry, D. J., Durkin, C. H., Abella, J. V. G. & Way, M. Open source software for quantification of cell migration, protrusions, and fluorescence intensities. J. Cell Biol. 209, 163–180 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Pinaud, L. et al. Injection of T3SS effectors not resulting in invasion is the main targeting mechanism of Shigella toward human lymphocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 9954–9959 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Allaoui, A., Sansonetti, P. J. & Parsot, C. MxiD, an outer membrane protein necessary for the secretion of the Shigella flexneri Ipa invasins. Mol. Microbiol. 7, 59–68 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lapaquette, P. et al. Shigella entry unveils a calcium/calpain-dependent mechanism for inhibiting sumoylation. eLife 6, e27444 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lafont, F., Van Nhieu, G. T., Hanada, K., Sansonetti, P. J. & van der Goot, F. G. Initial steps of Shigella infection depend on the cholesterol/sphingolipid raft‐mediated CD44–IpaB interaction. EMBO J. 21, 4449–4457 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Watarai, M., Funato, S. & Sasakawa, C. Interaction of Ipa proteins of Shigella flexneri with alpha5beta1 integrin promotes entry of the bacteria into mammalian cells. J. Exp. Med. 183, 991–999 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Skoudy, A. et al. CD44 binds to the Shigella IpaB protein and participates in bacterial invasion of epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2, 19–33 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang, D. et al. Beta-defensins: linking innate and adaptive immunity through dendritic and T cell CCR6. Science 286, 525–528 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang, D., Chen, Q., Chertov, O. & Oppenheim, J. J. Human neutrophil defensins selectively chemoattract naive T and immature dendritic cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 68, 9–14 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Röhrl, J., Yang, D., Oppenheim, J. J. & Hehlgans, T. Human beta-defensin 2 and 3 and their mouse orthologs induce chemotaxis through interaction with CCR2. J. Immunol. 184, 6688–6694 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dong, X. et al. Keratinocyte-derived defensins activate neutrophil-specific receptors Mrgpra2a/b to prevent skin dysbiosis and bacterial infection. Immunity 55, 1645–1662.e7 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Karlsson, M. et al. A single-cell type transcriptomics map of human tissues. Sci. Adv. 7, eabh2169 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bouhaddou, M. et al. The global phosphorylation landscape of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Cell 182, 685–712.e19 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Hohenegger, M. et al. G-selective G protein antagonists. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 346–351 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Seal, R. L. et al. Genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D1003–D1009 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gillespie, M. et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D687–D692 (2022).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Meis, S. et al. NF546 [4,4'-(carbonylbis(imino-3,1-phenylene-carbonylimino-3,1-(4-methyl-phenylene)-carbonylimino))-bis(1,3-xylene-alpha,alpha'-diphosphonic acid) tetrasodium salt] is a non-nucleotide P2Y11 agonist and stimulates release of interleukin-8 from human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 332, 238–247 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dreisig, K. & Kornum, B. R. A critical look at the function of the P2Y11 receptor. Purinergic Signal. 12, 427–437 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ng, P. Y. et al. Inhibition of cytokine-mediated JNK signalling by purinergic P2Y11 receptors, a novel protective mechanism in endothelial cells. Cell. Signal. 51, 59–71 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wu, Y., Ge, L., Li, S. & Song, Z. Antagonism of P2Y11 receptor (P2Y11R) protects epidermal stem cells against UV-B irradiation. Am. J. Transl. Res. 11, 4738–4745 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Rajabi, M. et al. Functional determinants of human enteric α-defensin HD5: crucial role for hydrophobicity at dimer interface. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 21615–21627 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Campbell-Valois, F. X. et al. A fluorescent reporter reveals on/off regulation of the Shigella type III secretion apparatus during entry and cell-to-cell spread. Cell Host Microbe 15, 177–189 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Grassart, A. et al. Bioengineered human organ-on-chip reveals intestinal microenvironment and mechanical forces impacting Shigella infection. Cell Host Microbe 26, 435–444.e4 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Williams, A. D. et al. Human alpha defensin 5 is a candidate biomarker to delineate inflammatory bowel disease. PLoS ONE 12, e0179710 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hong, J. S. et al. Application of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect antimicrobial peptides in human intestinal lumen. J. Immunol. Methods 525, 113599 (2024).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ghosh, D. et al. Paneth cell trypsin is the processing enzyme for human defensin-5. Nat. Immunol. 3, 583–590 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lehrer, R. I. & Lu, W. α-defensins in human innate immunity. Immunol. Rev. 245, 84–112 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chu, H. et al. Human α-defensin 6 promotes mucosal innate immunity through self-assembled peptide nanonets. Science 337, 477–481 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Kudryashova, E. et al. Human defensins facilitate local unfolding of thermodynamically unstable regions of bacterial protein toxins. Immunity 41, 709–721 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Fu, J. et al. Mechanisms and regulation of defensins in host defense. Sig. Transduct. Target. Ther. 8, 300 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Vongsa, R. A., Zimmerman, N. P. & Dwinell, M. B. CCR6 regulation of the actin cytoskeleton orchestrates human beta defensin-2- and CCL20-mediated restitution of colonic epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 10034–10045 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Jin, G. & Weinberg, A. Human antimicrobial peptides and cancer. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 88, 156–162 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Biragyn, A. et al. Toll-like receptor 4-dependent activation of dendritic cells by beta-defensin 2. Science 298, 1025–1029 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kennedy, C. P2Y(11) receptors: properties, distribution and functions. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1051, 107–122 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ledderose, C. et al. The purinergic receptor P2Y11 choreographs the polarization, mitochondrial metabolism, and migration of T lymphocytes. Sci. Signal. 13, eaba3300 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Moreschi, I. et al. NAADP+ is an agonist of the human P2Y11 purinergic receptor. Cell Calcium 43, 344–355 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Grieshaber, N. A., Boitano, S., Ji, I., Mather, J. P. & Ji, T. H. Differentiation of granulosa cell line: follicle-stimulating hormone induces formation of lamellipodia and filopodia via the adenylyl cyclase/cyclic adenosine monophosphate signal. Endocrinology 141, 3461–3470 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gomez, T. M. & Robles, E. The great escape: phosphorylation of Ena/VASP by PKA promotes filopodial formation. Neuron 42, 1–3 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Lin, Y. L., Lei, Y. T., Hong, C. J. & Hsueh, Y. P. Syndecan-2 induces filopodia and dendritic spine formation via the neurofibromin-PKA-Ena/VASP pathway. J. Cell Biol. 177, 829–841 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Qi, A.-D., Kennedy, C., Harden, T. K. & Nicholas, R. A. Differential coupling of the human P2Y11 receptor to phospholipase C and adenylyl cyclase. Br. J. Pharmacol. 132, 318–326 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Sato, T. et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459, 262–265 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. King, B. F. & Townsend-Nicholson, A. Involvement of P2Y1 and P2Y11 purinoceptors in parasympathetic inhibition of colonic smooth muscle. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 324, 1055–1063 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Kim, H. J., Li, H., Collins, J. J. & Ingber, D. E. Contributions of microbiome and mechanical deformation to intestinal bacterial overgrowth and inflammation in a human gut-on-a-chip. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E7–E15 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omics 16, 284–287 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Villanueva, R. A. M. & Chen, Z. J. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis (2nd ed.). Measurement 17, 160–167 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Yu, G. enrichplot: visualization of functional enrichment result. Version 1.23.1. GitHub https://github.com/YuLab-SMU/enrichplot (2023).

  67. Lyu, F. et al. OmicStudio: a composable bioinformatics cloud platform with real-time feedback that can generate high-quality graphs for publication. Imeta 2, e85 (2023).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357–360 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Pertea, M. et al. StringTie enables improved reconstruction of a transcriptome from RNA-seq reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 290–295 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Wiśniewski, J. R., Zougman, A., Nagaraj, N. & Mann, M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat. Methods 6, 359–362 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Orsburn, B. C. Proteome Discoverer—a community enhanced data processing suite for protein informatics. Proteomes 9, 15 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Coudert, E. et al. Annotation of biologically relevant ligands in UniProtKB using ChEBI. Bioinformatics 39, btac793 (2023).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Singh, U. C., Weiner, S. J. & Kollman, P. Molecular dynamics simulations of d(C-G-C-G-A) X d(T-C-G-C-G) with and without "hydrated" counterions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 755–759 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Genheden, S. & Ryde, U. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 10, 449–461 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Wu, E. L. et al. CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder toward realistic biological membrane simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 35, 1997–2004 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Huang, X. et al. Fast, long-term, super-resolution imaging with Hessian structured illumination microscopy. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 451–459 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Wang, C., Dang, T., Baste, J., Anil Joshi, A. & Bhushan, A. A novel standalone microfluidic device for local control of oxygen tension for intestinal-bacteria interactions. FASEB J. 35, e21291 (2021).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671–675 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Chen, T. et al. The Genome Sequence Archive Family: toward explosive data growth and diverse data types. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 19, 578–583 (2021).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. CNCB-NGDC Members and Partners. Database resources of the National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation in 2024. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, D18–D32 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Xu, D. et al. Shigella infection is facilitated by interaction of human enteric α-defensin 5 with colonic epithelial receptor P2Y11. GitHub https://github.com/MengyaoGuo-xjtu/Analysis-of-HD5-interacting-proteins (2024).

  85. Xu, D. et al. Shigella infection is facilitated by interaction of human enteric α-defensin 5 with colonic epithelial receptor P2Y11. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14171198 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Jegou and L. Cao from Institute Jacques Monod of CNRS and Université Paris Cité for scientific advice and technical assistance on pyrene assay of in vitro actin polymerization; Y. Hao and Z. Ren at the Instrument Analysis Center of Xi’an Jiaotong University for technical assistance with fluorescence and electron microscopic analysis; Y. Wu from Institut Pasteur for providing the Sleeping Beauty transposon system; Guangzhou CSR Biotech Co. Ltd for cell imaging using their commercial super-resolution microscope (HIS-SIM), data acquisition, SR image reconstruction, analysis and discussion; Q. Lu and M. Xia from Shanghai Jiaotong University for suggestions on the molecular docking simulation analysis. This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China grants 2022YFC3400300 to K.Y.; National Natural Science Foundation of China grants 32125009 to K.Y., 32070134 to D.X., 32270188 to D.X., 82030062 to W.L. and 32222022 to Y.J.; and the Fundamental Research Funds of Xi’an Jiaotong University (xtr052023012 to D.X.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

D.X., K.Y., P.J.S., W.L. and N.S. conceptualized the project. D.X., M.G., X.X., G.L., S.J.B., C.W. and Y.J. developed the methodology. D.X., M.G., X.X., G.L., Yaxin Liu, C.W., T.X., C.L., Q.W., Wenying Zhao, W. Zeng, Yuezhuangnan Liu, S.L., S.Z. and Wei Zhao conducted investigations. D.X., M.G., X.X., G.L. and S.Z. performed visualization. K.Y., W.L., D.X. and Y.J. acquired funding. D.X. and K.Y. administered the project. K.Y., P.J.S., W.L. and N.S. supervised the project. D.X., M.G. and S.J.B. wrote the original draft. D.X., K.Y., P.J.S., W.L. and S.J.B. reviewed and edited the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Wuyuan Lu, Philippe J. Sansonetti or Kai Ye.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Microbiology thanks Gill Diamond and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Influence of HD5 and Shigella on cytoskeleton in HeLa cells and schematic illustration of experimental procedure of Shigella infection and FRET assay.

a, Fluorescence microscopy analysis of cytoskeleton of HeLa cells in the presence of a serial concentration of HD5. F-actin is red, and nuclei are blue (DAPI). The bars represent 20 μm. b, Influence of Shigella at MOI of 100 on the cytoskeleton of HeLa cells. F-actin is red, GFP-expressing Sf301 is green and nuclei are blue (DAPI). The bars represent 10 μm. c, Schematic illustration of experimental procedure of different pretreatment combinations and co-incubation. To further distinguish the effects of HD5 on bacteria and host cell respectively, HD5 was allowed to interact with Shigella or HeLa cells separately for 15 min, followed by 3 washes to thoroughly remove unbound defensin molecules. Different pretreatment combinations result in different levels of bacterial adhesion and invasion as shown in Fig. 2c. d, Illustration of Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) assay and its application to analyze the T3SS activity of Shigella in its invasion in the absence of presence of HD5. e, Influence of 2 μM HD5 on the adhesion and invasion of Shigella ΔmxiD mutant in comparison with wildtype Sf301 strain. Significance compared with solvent control (0 μM) group was calculated using a one-way ANOVA (Tukey’s multiple comparison Test), and indicated as the p value. ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. Data are presented as mean±s.d. Results are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Influence of HD5 on cytoskeleton of different cell lines and HeLa mutants.

a, Fluorescence microscopy analysis and quantification (n = 10) of cytoskeleton alterations in 10 adherent epithelial cell lines, primary colonocytes and 8 suspension cell lines in the absence (control) or presence of 2 μM HD5. In the upper panel, for epithelial cell lines and primary cells, the bar represents 10 μm; for suspension cells, the bar represents 20 μm. HIFE are indicated with arrows. F-actin is grey and nuclei are blue (DAPI). In the lower panel, bars indicate mean; errors, s.d. b, Fluorescence microscopy analysis of cytoskeleton of HeLa cells microinjected with HD5. HD5 was microinjected into HeLa cells to produce intracellular concentrations of 0.5 to 5 μM, which failed to produce any significant alteration to the cytoskeleton. Injected cells are indicated in red (with Texas Red as microinjection tracker), F-actin is green and nuclei are blue (DAPI). The bar represents 50 μm. c, Fluorescence absorbance analysis of in vitro actin polymerization dynamics of 4 μM actin in the presence of 4 μM HD5 or 1 nM formin. The addition of up to 4 μM HD5 into an in vitro actin polymerization system had minimal effect on the nucleation and elongation of actin filaments. Each data point represents the fluorescence value at that time point. d, Immunoblotting examination of β1 integrin and CD44 knockout in HeLa cells. e, Influence of β1 integrin and CD44 knockout on Shigella adhesion/invasion (n = 6). Data are presented as mean±s.d. f, Influence of β1 integrin and CD44 knockout on the cytoskeleton of HeLa cells in the presence or absence of 4 μM HD5. The bar represents 20 μm. Depletion of β1 integrin subunit and CD44 from HeLa cells by the CRISPR/Cas9 system neither affected the association of HD5 with Shigella adhesion and invasion, nor the formation of filopodia. Significance was determined by a two-tailed unpaired Student’ s t-test, and indicated as the p value. ns: no signification, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Human phospho-kinase antibody array analysis and phosphoproteomic analysis of HeLa cells upon HD5 treatment.

a, Human phospho-kinase antibody array analysis of the phosphorylation of major kinases in the absence and presence of 4 μM HD5 as instructed by the manufacturer. Significance compared with solvent control (0 μM) group was calculated using two-tailed unpaired Student’ s t-test, and indicated as the p value. ns: no signification, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. Data are presented as mean±s.d. b, Top 50 proteins in phosphoproteomic analysis phosphorylated upon HD5 stimulation and dephosphorylated upon suramin treatment. Many of those proteins are involved in cytoskeleton related pathway such as Ras signaling pathway (RALGAPA1), Focal adhesion (CAV2), tight junction (CTTN), PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (PKN2), intermediate-sized filaments formation (KRT8), MAPK signaling (MAPK1), determining cell morphology (MISP), Rap1 interacting factor 1(RIF1), microtubule motor activity (KIF4B),cell junction organization (PLEC) and GTPase activator activity (USP6NL). c, GO terms in cellular component (CC) ontology of the phosphoproteome altered by HD5. A total of 363 phosphorylated sites, including 316 pSer (pS), 30 pThr (pT), and 17pTyr (pY) were selected as high-confidence targets from phosphoproteomic analysis for subsequent gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis. Results are representative of three independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Fluorescence microscopy analysis of influence of widely-recognized cytoskeleton-regulating pathways inhibitors on cytoskeleton of HeLa cells in the presence of 2 μM HD5.

The concentrations of inhibitors used as: 20 μM H89, 20 μM PKI 14-22, 200 μM IBMX, 90 μM RO 20-1724, 50 μM KH7, 10 μM AZD4547, 2 μM AZD6244, 50 μM SP600125, 10 μM SB2035804, 10 μM Gefitinib, 10 μM Lapatinib, 1 μM Bisindolylmaleimide I, 50 μM Rapamycin, 5 μM PI-103, 2.5 μM U-73122, 5 μM Bapta-AM, 10 μM Bapta-AM. F-actin is grey, and nuclei are blue (DAPI). The bar represents 10 μm. Results are representative of three independent experiments.

Extended Data Fig. 5 P2Y11 was identified as the main receptor of HD5 for HIFE generation.

a, Expression analysis of Gs-coupled GPCRs in the tested cell lines using HPA database. b, Transcriptome analysis of the expression of GPCRs in the tested cell lines. c, Mass spectrometry analysis of the biotin-HD5-pulldown proteins using P2Y11-target searching strategy and two peptides of P2Y11 are present in the HD5-associated protein complex. d, 100-ns dynamic trajectory of simulated interaction between HD5 and P2Y11. e, MD simulation showing that NF340 exhibited -2.99 kcal/mol binding free energy to weakly occupy the receptor P2Y11. f-g, Fluorescence microscopy analysis and quantification of influence of NF157 on cytoskeleton of HeLa cells when added after HD5 addition or before HD5 addition. F-actin is red and nuclei are blue (DAPI). The bar represents 20 μm. Data are presented as mean±s.d. Significance between the indicated groups was calculated using a one-way ANOVA (Tukey’ s multiple comparison Test), and p values are as follows: **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001.h, Immunoblotting analysis of P2Y11 expression after CRISPR/Cas9 knockout. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Influence of P2Y11 agonists on HeLa cytoskeleton and the influence of HD5 on caspase activities of HeLa cells.

a, b, Effects of ATPγs and NAD+ on filopodia generation capacity and bacterial invasion efficiency (n = 8). In a, F-actin is red and nuclei are blue (DAPI), the bar represents 10 μm; in b, Data are presented as mean±s.d. c, In non-infected (left panel) and infected (right panel) conditions, the caspase activities (Caspase 3/7) of HeLa cells were assessed in the presence or absence of 4 μM HD5 (n = 3). Significance between indicated groups was calculated using a one-way ANOVA (Dunnett’ s multiple comparison Test for b and Tukey’ s multiple comparison for c), and indicated as the p values. ns, not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 MD analysis of HD5-P2Y11 interaction and distribution of P2Y11 in HeLa cells and human colonic samples.

a, Root-mean-square deviation variance analysis of the steady engagement of HD5 with P2Y11 after 50 ns in the 100-ns dynamic trajectory. b, Fluorescence microscopy analysis of P2Y11 distribution in the absence or presence of 2 μM HD5 in HeLa cells. P2Y11 is green, F-actin is red and nuclei are blue (DAPI). Cell outlines are indicated by the dash lines and arrows. The bar represents 10 μm. c, Fluorescence microscopy analysis of P2Y11 distribution in two human colonic tissue (samples 2 and 3). P2Y11 is green, F-actin is red, and nuclei are blue (DAPI). The bar represents 100 μm. The right panels show gray values of P2Y11 signals in the apical and basolateral regions in human colonic crypt in the samples. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Influence of HD5 on cell adhesion, cell viability, TEER, DSS-damage and microvilli generation of epithelial cells.

a, b, Fluorescence microscopy analysis of influence of initial adherence on HeLa, CACO-2 and HT29-MTX cells in the presence of 2 μM HD5 for 30 min (a) and quantification of cell attachment on petri dishes assessed by crystal violet staining 1 h post-seeding (b). F-actin is grey and nuclei are blue (DAPI). The bars represent 1 μm. c, Effects of different concentrations of HD5 on cell viability after 48-hour treatment (n = 5). d, The influence of different concentrations of HD5 on the trans-epithelial electrical resistance (TEER) during the polarization process of CACO-2 cells. e, Fluorescence microscopy analysis of the protective effect of HD5 on intestinal epithelial barrier upon 10% DSS damage. ZO-1 is green, F-actin is red and nuclei are blue (DAPI). The bars represent 100 μm. f, SEM analysis (n = 5) of the microvilli on polarized CACO-2 cells cultured in transwell for 5 days in the absence (control) or presence of 2 μM HD5. The bars represent 1 μm. Data are presented as mean±s.d. (b-d, f). Significance between indicated groups was calculated using a one-way ANOVA (Dunnett’s multiple comparison Test), and indicated as the p value. ns, not significant, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Influence of P2Y11 antagonists on Shigella infection in epithelial cells and macrophage.

a, Effect of P2Y11 antagonists (suramin, NF449 and NF157) on Shigella adhesion in the absence or presence of 2 μM HD5 (n = 4). b, Influence of suramin, NF449, NF157 on the invasion efficiency of Sf301 in non-polarized CACO-2 cells in the presence of 2 μM HD5 for 30 min (n = 4). Adhesion is defined as the total number (colony-forming unit, CFU) of CACO-2 cell-associated bacteria after 10-minute centrifuge. Invasion is expressed as the CFU of intracellular bacteria in CACO-2 cells in the next 30 min. Invasion efficiency is presented as ratio of invasion/adhesion. c, Fluorescence microscopy analysis examination of NF157 on cytoskeleton of PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells in the presence of 2 μM HD5. F-actin is red, P2Y11 is green and nuclei are blue (DAPI). The bar represents 10 μm. d, Influence of NF157 on the adhesion and invasion efficiency of Shigella in PMA-differentiated THP-1cells in the presence or absence of 2 μM HD5 (n = 6). Data are presented as mean±s.d. (a, b, d). Significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA (Dunnett’ s multiple comparison Test for a, b and Tukey’ s multiple comparison Test for d), and indicated as the p value. ns: no signification, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 10 Influence of NF157 on Shigella infection in CACO-2 cells and P2Y11 expression in corneal epithelial cells of guinea pigs.

a, Fluorescence microscopy analysis of influence of NF157 on the TSAR activation of Sf301 in non-polarized CACO-2 cells. F-actin is grey, Shigella bacteria are red, GFP-expressing bacteria are green and nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). The bar represents 100 μm. b-d, Influence of NF157 on intracellular CFU (n = 6) (b), trans-epithelial electrical resistance (n = 3) (TEER, c) and epithelial integrity (d) of polarized CACO-2 cells infected with Shigella in the absence or presence of HD5. F-actin is red. Bacteria are green and nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue), and the bars represent 100 μm. Data are presented as mean±s.d. (b, c). Significance was determined by a two-tailed unpaired Student’ s t-test (b, c), and indicated as the p value. ns: no signification, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. e, Influence of NF157 on the Shigella T3SS activation (TSAR activity) on gut-on-chip with constant flow at the rate to 20 μL/h. The bars represent 50 μm. f. Immunofluorescence analysis of expression of P2Y11 in corneal epithelial cells of guinea pigs in the absence (upper panels) or presence (lower panels) of HD5 (Rhodamine-tagged). F-actin is red, P2Y11 is green, HD5 is grey and nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue), and the bars represent 100 μm. All results are representative of at least three independent experiments.

Source data

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Peer Review File

Supplementary Table 1

Cell lines information; gene expression (GPCR) of different cell lines; oligo sequence and commercial reagents.

Supplementary Video 1

Cytoskeleton alteration of HeLa cells within 25 min in the presence of 4 μM HD5. F-actin is grey. Bar indicates 5 μm. Result is representative of at least 3 independent experiments.

Supplementary Video 2

Shigella invasion of HeLa cells within 25 min in the absence of HD5. F-actin is grey, GFP-expressing Sf301 is green. Bar indicates 5 μm. Result is representative of at least 3 independent experiments.

Supplementary Video 3

Shigella invasion of HeLa cells within 25 min in the presence of 4 μM HD5. F-actin is grey, GFP-expressing Sf301 is green. Bar indicates 5 μm. Result is representative of at least 3 independent experiments.

Supplementary Video 4

Vertical 3D view of fluorescence microscopy analysis of P2Y11 distribution in gut-on-chip built with CACO-2 cells. P2Y11 is green, F-actin is red and nuclei are blue (DAPI). Bar represents 25 μm. Result is representative of at least 3 independent experiments.

Supplementary Video 5

Vertical 3D view of fluorescence microscopy analysis of Shigella infection in gut-on-chip built with CACO-2 cells. Shigella is green, F-actin is red and nuclei are blue (DAPI). Bar represents 25 μm. Result is representative of at least 3 independent experiments.

Supplementary Video 6

Vertical 3D view of fluorescence microscopy analysis of Shigella infection in gut-on-chip built with CACO-2 cells in the presence of 20 μM NF157. F-actin is red, actively-invading bacteria are green (TSAR-positive) and nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). Bar represents 25 μm. Result is representative of at least 3 independent experiments.

Supplementary Video 7

Vertical 3D view of fluorescence microscopy analysis of Shigella infection in gut-on-chip built with CACO-2 cells in the presence of 4 μM HD5. F-actin is red, actively-invading bacteria are green (TSAR-positive) and nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). Bar represents 25 μm. Result is representative of at least 3 independent experiments.

Supplementary Video 8

Vertical 3D view of fluorescence microscopy analysis of Shigella infection in gut-on-chip built with CACO-2 cells in the presence of 20 μM NF157 and 4 μM HD5. F-actin is red, actively-invading bacteria are green (TSAR-positive) and nuclei are stained with DAPI (blue). Bar represents 25 μm. Result is representative of at least 3 independent experiments.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 9

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, D., Guo, M., Xu, X. et al. Shigella infection is facilitated by interaction of human enteric α-defensin 5 with colonic epithelial receptor P2Y11. Nat Microbiol 10, 509–526 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-024-01901-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-024-01901-9

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology