Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Hyperspectral reporters for long-distance and wide-area detection of gene expression in living bacteria

Abstract

Genetically encoded reporters are suitable for short-distance imaging in the laboratory but not for scanning wide outdoor areas from a distance. Here we introduce hyperspectral reporters (HSRs) designed for hyperspectral imaging cameras that are commonly mounted on unmanned aerial vehicles and satellites. HSR genes encode enzymes that produce a molecule with a unique absorption signature that can be reliably distinguished in hyperspectral images. Quantum mechanical simulations of 20,170 metabolites identified candidate HSRs, leading to the selection of biliverdin IXα and bacteriochlorophyll a for their distinct absorption spectra and biosynthetic feasibility. These genes were integrated into chemical sensor circuits in soil (Pseudomonas putida) and aquatic (Rubrivivax gelatinosus) bacteria. The bacteria were detectable outdoors under ambient light from up to 90 m in a single 4,000-m2 hyperspectral image taken using fixed and unmanned aerial vehicle-mounted cameras. The dose–response functions of the chemical sensors were measured remotely. HSRs enable large-scale studies and applications in ecology, agriculture, environmental monitoring, forensics and defense.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Prediction of metabolite spectra.
Fig. 2: Computational HSR design.
Fig. 3: Extraction of HSR information from images.
Fig. 4: Remote detection of chemical signals using HSRs.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The TD-DFT results are shared in Supplementary Data 1 and as a web app that can be accessed at https://voigtlab.github.io/npspec/. Sequence data for strains and plasmids used in this work are included in Supplementary Information. Raw hyperspectral images can be accessed from Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14756888 (ref. 124). Some images could not be uploaded due to repository storage limits. These and any additional data are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The code for predicting metabolite spectra, computing the number of enzyme steps, uniqueness and contrast, and processing HSI images is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14827800 (ref. 125). The code to deploy the interactive web application to visualize the spectral predictions is available at https://zenodo.org/records/14827805 (ref. 126).

References

  1. Zhang, J., Campbell, R. E., Ting, A. Y. & Tsien, R. Y. Creating new fluorescent probes for cell biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 906–918 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yagi, K. Applications of whole-cell bacterial sensors in biotechnology and environmental science. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 73, 1251–1258 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodrigo-Navarro, A., Sankaran, S., Dalby, M. J., del Campo, A. & Salmeron-Sanchez, M. Engineered living biomaterials. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 1175–1190 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang, J. H. & Chung, J.-K. Molecular-genetic imaging based on reporter gene expression. J. Nucl. Med. 49, 164S–179S (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghim, C. M., Lee, S. K., Takayama, S. & Mitchell, R. J. The art of reporter proteins in science: past, present and future applications. BMB Rep. 43, 451–460 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hall, C. V., Jacob, P. E., Ringold, G. M. & Lee, F. Expression and regulation of Escherichia coli lacZ gene fusions in mammalian cells. J. Mol. Appl. Genet. 2, 101–109 (1983).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nielsen, D. A., Chou, J., MacKrell, A. J., Casadaban, M. J. & Steiner, D. F. Expression of a preproinsulin-β-galactosidase gene fusion in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80, 5198–5202 (1983).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Chalfie, M., Tu, Y., Euskirchen, G., Ward, W. W. & Prasher, D. C. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263, 802–805 (1994).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shepherd, E. S., DeLoache, W. C., Pruss, K. M., Whitaker, W. R. & Sonnenburg, J. L. An exclusive metabolic niche enables strain engraftment in the gut microbiota. Nature 557, 434–438 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Qi, L. S. et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 152, 1173–1183 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Geddes, B. A. et al. Engineering transkingdom signalling in plants to control gene expression in rhizosphere bacteria. Nat. Commun. 10, 3430 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Heidecker, G. & Müller-Hill, B. Synthetic multifunctional proteins. Mol. Gen. Genet. 155, 301–307 (1977).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sharma, S. K., Poudel Sharma, S. & Leblanc, R. M. Methods of detection of β-galactosidase enzyme in living cells. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 150, 109885 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller, J. H. Experiments in Molecular Genetics (Cold Spring Habour Laboratory, 1972).

  15. Hui, C.-y et al. Genetic control of violacein biosynthesis to enable a pigment-based whole-cell lead biosensor. RSC Adv. 10, 28106–28113 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Hui, C.-y, Guo, Y., Li, H., Gao, C.-x & Yi, J. Detection of environmental pollutant cadmium in water using a visual bacterial biosensor. Sci. Rep. 12, 6898 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hui, C.-y et al. Indigoidine biosynthesis triggered by the heavy metal-responsive transcription regulator: a visual whole-cell biosensor. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 105, 6087–6102 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoshida, K. et al. Novel carotenoid-based biosensor for simple visual detection of arsenite: characterization and preliminary evaluation for environmental application. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 6730–6738 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Hui, C.-y et al. Metabolic engineering of the carotenoid biosynthetic pathway toward a specific and sensitive inorganic mercury biosensor. RSC Adv. 12, 36142–36148 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. He, Y., Zhang, T., Sun, H., Zhan, H. & Zhao, Y. A reporter for noninvasively monitoring gene expression and plant transformation. Hortic. Res. 7, 152 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Zalatan, J. G. et al. Engineering complex synthetic transcriptional programs with CRISPR RNA scaffolds. Cell 160, 339–350 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sandell, J. L. & Zhu, T. C. A review of in-vivo optical properties of human tissues and its impact on PDT. J. Biophotonics 4, 773–787 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. McKinnon, K. M. Flow cytometry: an overview. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 120, 5.1.1–5.1.11 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dietrich, J. A., McKee, A. E. & Keasling, J. D. High-throughput metabolic engineering: advances in small-molecule screening and selection. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 563–590 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Prabowo, C. P. S. et al. Production of natural colorants by metabolically engineered microorganisms. Trends Chem. 4, 608–626 (2022).

  26. Ando, R., Hama, H., Yamamoto-Hino, M., Mizuno, H. & Miyawaki, A. An optical marker based on the UV-induced green-to-red photoconversion of a fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12651–12656 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Shaner, N. C. et al. Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1567–1572 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shcherbakova, D. M. & Verkhusha, V. V. Near-infrared fluorescent proteins for multicolor in vivo imaging. Nat. Methods 10, 751–754 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Drepper, T. et al. Reporter proteins for in vivo fluorescence without oxygen. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 443–445 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Belkin, S. et al. Remote detection of buried landmines using a bacterial sensor. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 308–310 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rigoulot, S. B. et al. Imaging of multiple fluorescent proteins in canopies enables synthetic biology in plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 19, 830–843 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shcherbakova, D. M., Stepanenko, O. V., Turoverov, K. K. & Verkhusha, V. V. Near-infrared fluorescent proteins: multiplexing and optogenetics across scales. Trends Biotechnol. 36, 1230–1243 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Liu, P., Mu, X., Zhang, X.-D. & Ming, D. The near-infrared-II fluorophores and advanced microscopy technologies development and application in bioimaging. Bioconjug. Chem. 31, 260–275 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Shu, X. et al. Mammalian expression of infrared fluorescent proteins engineered from a bacterial phytochrome. Science 324, 804–807 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Piatkevich, K. D. et al. Near-infrared fluorescent proteins engineered from bacterial phytochromes in neuroimaging. Biophys. J. 113, 2299–2309 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Rodriguez, E. A. et al. A far-red fluorescent protein evolved from a cyanobacterial phycobiliprotein. Nat. Methods 13, 763–769 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ow, D. W. et al. Transient and stable expression of the firefly luciferase gene in plant cells and transgenic plants. Science 234, 856–859 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Millar, A. J., Short, S. R., Chua, N. H. & Kay, S. A. A novel circadian phenotype based on firefly luciferase expression in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 4, 1075–1087 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Liu, Y., Golden, S. S., Kondo, T., Ishiura, M. & Johnson, C. H. Bacterial luciferase as a reporter of circadian gene expression in cyanobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 177, 2080–2086 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. McElroy, W. D. The energy source for bioluminescence in an isolated system. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 33, 342–345 (1947).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Love, A. C. & Prescher, J. A. Seeing (and using) the light: recent developments in bioluminescence technology. Cell Chem. Biol. 27, 904–920 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Cheng, H.-Y., Masiello, C. A., Bennett, G. N. & Silberg, J. J. Volatile gas production by methyl halide transferase: an in situ reporter of microbial gene expression in soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 8750–8759 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Cheng, H.-Y. et al. Ratiometric gas reporting: a nondisruptive approach to monitor gene expression in soils. ACS Synth. Biol. 7, 903–911 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shu, X. et al. A genetically encoded tag for correlated light and electron microscopy of intact cells, tissues, and organisms. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001041 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Shapiro, M. G. et al. Biogenic gas nanostructures as ultrasonic molecular reporters. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 311–316 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Farhadi, A., Ho, G. H., Sawyer, D. P., Bourdeau, R. W. & Shapiro, M. G. Ultrasound imaging of gene expression in mammalian cells. Science 365, 1469–1475 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, L. V. & Yao, J. A practical guide to photoacoustic tomography in the life sciences. Nat. Methods 13, 627–638 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Genove, G., DeMarco, U., Xu, H., Goins, W. F. & Ahrens, E. T. A new transgene reporter for in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Nat. Med. 11, 450–454 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Luker, G. D. et al. Noninvasive imaging of protein–protein interactions in living animals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 6961–6966 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Daeffler, K. N. M. et al. Engineering bacterial thiosulfate and tetrathionate sensors for detecting gut inflammation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 923 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Del Valle, I. et al. Translating new synthetic biology advances for biosensing into the earth and environmental sciences. Front. Microbiol. 11, 618373 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. McNerney, M. P., Doiron, K. E., Ng, T. L., Chang, T. Z. & Silver, P. A. Theranostic cells: emerging clinical applications of synthetic biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 730–746 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Voigt, C. A. Genetic parts to program bacteria. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 17, 548–557 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Lazar, J. T. & Tabor, J. J. Bacterial two-component systems as sensors for synthetic biology applications. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 28, 100398 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Nielsen, A. A. et al. Genetic circuit design automation. Science 352, aac7341 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Meyer, A. J., Segall-Shapiro, T. H., Glassey, E., Zhang, J. & Voigt, C. A. Escherichia coli ‘Marionette’ strains with 12 highly optimized small-molecule sensors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 196–204 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Basu, S., Mehreja, R., Thiberge, S., Chen, M.-T. & Weiss, R. Spatiotemporal control of gene expression with pulse-generating networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 6355–6360 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Wilke, C. Remote sensing for crops spots pests and pathogens. ACS Cent. Sci. 9, 339–342 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. do Prado Ribeiro, L. et al. Hyperspectral imaging to characterize plant–plant communication in response to insect herbivory. Plant Methods 14, 54 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Stuart, M. B., McGonigle, A. J. & Willmott, J. R. Hyperspectral imaging in environmental monitoring: a review of recent developments and technological advances in compact field deployable systems. Sensors 19, 3071 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Silva, C. S. et al. Near infrared hyperspectral imaging for forensic analysis of document forgery. Analyst 139, 5176–5184 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen, H.-W., McGurr, M. & Brickhouse, M. in Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XXI (eds Velez-Reyes, M. & Kruse, F. A.) 947202 (SPIE, 2015).

  63. Mahlein, A.-K., Kuska, M. T., Behmann, J., Polder, G. & Walter, A. Hyperspectral sensors and imaging technologies in phytopathology: state of the art. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 56, 535–558 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Leblanc, G., Kalacska, M. & Soffer, R. Detection of single graves by airborne hyperspectral imaging. Forensic Sci. Int. 245, 17–23 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Briechle, S., Molitor, N., Krzystek, P. & Vosselman, G. Detection of radioactive waste sites in the Chornobyl exclusion zone using UAV-based lidar data and multispectral imagery. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 167, 345–362 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lang, M., Stelzer, M. & Schomburg, D. BKM-react, an integrated biochemical reaction database. BMC Biochem. 12, 42 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Bansal, P. et al. Rhea, the reaction knowledgebase in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D693–D700 (2021).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Karp, P. D. et al. The BioCyc collection of microbial genomes and metabolic pathways. Brief. Bioinform. 20, 1085–1093 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Taniguchi, M. & Lindsey, J. S. Database of absorption and fluorescence spectra of >300 common compounds for use in PhotoChemCAD. Photochem. Photobiol. 94, 290–327 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Noelle, A. et al. UV/Vis+ photochemistry database: structure, content and applications. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 253, 107056 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Vokáčová, Z. & Burda, J. V. Computational study on spectral properties of the selected pigments from various photosystems: structure–transition energy relationship. J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 5864–5878 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Phan, K., De Meester, S., Raes, K., De Clerck, K. & Van Speybroeck, V. A comparative study on the photophysical properties of anthocyanins and pyranoanthocyanins. Chemistry 27, 5956–5971 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Jacquemin, D., Perpète, E. A., Ciofini, I. & Adamo, C. Accurate simulation of optical properties in dyes. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 326–334 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Charaf-Eddin, A., Planchat, A., Mennucci, B., Adamo, C. & Jacquemin, D. Choosing a functional for computing absorption and fluorescence band shapes with TD-DFT. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 2749–2760 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Conradie, J., Wamser, C. C. & Ghosh, A. Understanding hyperporphyrin spectra: TDDFT calculations on diprotonated tetrakis(p-aminophenyl)porphyrin. J. Phys. Chem. A 125, 9953–9961 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Jacquemin, D., Wathelet, V., Perpète, E. A. & Adamo, C. Extensive TD-DFT benchmark: singlet-excited states of organic molecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 5, 2420–2435 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Gritsenko, O. & Baerends, E. J. Asymptotic correction of the exchange–correlation kernel of time-dependent density functional theory for long-range charge-transfer excitations. J. Chem. Phys. 121, 655–660 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Laurent, A. D. & Jacquemin, D. TD-DFT benchmarks: a review. Int. J. Quant. Chem. 113, 2019–2039 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Duan, C., Nandy, A., Meyer, R., Arunachalam, N. & Kulik, H. J. A transferable recommender approach for selecting the best density functional approximations in chemical discovery. Nat. Comput. Sci. 3, 38–47 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Shao, Y., Mei, Y., Sundholm, D. & Kaila, V. R. I. Benchmarking the performance of time-dependent density functional theory methods on biochromophores. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 587–600 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Weimer, A., Kohlstedt, M., Volke, D. C., Nikel, P. I. & Wittmann, C. Industrial biotechnology of Pseudomonas putida: advances and prospects. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 104, 7745–7766 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Steunou, A.-S., Astier, C. & Ouchane, S. Regulation of photosynthesis genes in Rubrivivax gelatinosus: transcription factor PpsR is involved in both negative and positive control. J. Bacteriol. 186, 3133–3142 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Lachaud, F. et al. Ground and excited state properties of new porphyrin based dyads: a combined theoretical and experimental study. J. Phys. Chem. A 116, 10736–10744 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Kantorovich, L. V. Mathematical methods of organizing and planning production. Manag. Sci. 6, 366–422 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ramdas, A., García Trillos, N. & Cuturi, M. On Wasserstein two-sample testing and related families of nonparametric tests. Entropy 19, 47 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Kotlobay, A. A. et al. Genetically encodable bioluminescent system from fungi. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12728–12732 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Gallo, G., Longo, G., Pallottino, S. & Nguyen, S. Directed hypergraphs and applications. Discret. Appl. Math. 42, 177–201 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Chen, G. E. et al. Complete enzyme set for chlorophyll biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq1407 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Bioucas-Dias, J. M. et al. Hyperspectral unmixing overview: geometrical, statistical, and sparse regression-based approaches. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 5, 354–379 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Xu, L., Li, J., Wong, A. & Peng, J. K-P-Means: a clustering algorithm of K ‘purified’ means for hyperspectral endmember estimation. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 11, 1787–1791 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Prades, J., Safont, G., Salazar, A. & Vergara, L. Estimation of the number of endmembers in hyperspectral images using agglomerative clustering. Remote Sensing 12, 3585 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Wegele, R., Tasler, R., Zeng, Y., Rivera, M. & Frankenberg-Dinkel, N. The heme oxygenase (s)-phytochrome system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 45791–45802 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Maiti, A. et al. Structural and photophysical characterization of the small ultra-red fluorescent protein. Nat. Commun. 14, 4155 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Boo, A. et al. Synthetic microbe-to-plant communication channels. Nat. Commun. 15, 1817 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Chen, G. E. & Hunter, C. N. Engineering chlorophyll, bacteriochlorophyll, and carotenoid biosynthetic pathways in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth. Biol. 12, 2236–2244 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Saga, Y. et al. Selective oxidation of B800 bacteriochlorophyll a in photosynthetic light-harvesting protein LH2. Sci. Rep. 9, 3636 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Becker, M., Nagarajan, V. & Parson, W. W. Properties of the excited singlet states of bacteriochlorophyll a and bacteriopheophytin a in polar solvents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 6840–6848 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Yokobayashi, Y., Weiss, R. & Arnold, F. H. Directed evolution of a genetic circuit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16587–16591 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Tabor, J. J., Levskaya, A. & Voigt, C. A. Multichromatic control of gene expression in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 405, 315–324 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Fernandez-Rodriguez, J., Moser, F., Song, M. & Voigt, C. A. Engineering RGB color vision into Escherichia coli. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 706–708 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Bradley, A. P. The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognit. 30, 1145–1159 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Gouterman, M. Study of the effects of substitution on the absorption spectra of porphin. J. Chem. Phys. 30, 1139–1161 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Taniguchi, M., Bocian, D. F., Holten, D. & Lindsey, J. S. Beyond green with synthetic chlorophylls—connecting structural features with spectral properties. J. Photoch. Photobio. C 52, 100513 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Gouterman, M. Spectra of porphyrins. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 6, 138–163 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Taniguchi, M. & Lindsey, J. S. Absorption and fluorescence spectral database of chlorophylls and analogues. Photochem. Photobiol. 97, 136–165 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Lakomy, I. et al. C45- and C50-carotenoids. Part 8. Synthesis of (all-E,2S,2′S)-bacterioruberin, (all-E,2S,2′S)-monoanhydrobacterioruberin, (all-E,2S,2′S)-bisanhydrobacterioruberin, (all-E,2R,2′R)-3,4,3′,4′-tetrahydrobisanhydrobacterioruberin, and (all-E,S)-2-isopentenyl-3,4-dehydrorhodopin. Helvetica 80, 472–486 (2010).

  107. Levin, I., Liu, M., Voigt, C. A. & Coley, C. W. Merging enzymatic and synthetic chemistry with computational synthesis planning. Nat. Commun. 13, 7747 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Sankaranarayanan, K. et al. Similarity based enzymatic retrosynthesis. Chem. Sci. 13, 6039–6053 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  109. Probst, D. et al. Biocatalysed synthesis planning using data-driven learning. Nat. Commun. 13, 964 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Koch, M., Duigou, T. & Faulon, J.-L. Reinforcement learning for bioretrosynthesis. ACS Synth. Biol. 9, 157–168 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Lin, G.-M., Warden-Rothman, R. & Voigt, C. A. Retrosynthetic design of metabolic pathways to chemicals not found in nature. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 14, 82–107 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Koscher, B. A. et al. Autonomous, multiproperty-driven molecular discovery: from predictions to measurements and back. Science 382, eadi1407 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Gómez-Bombarelli, R. et al. Design of efficient molecular organic light-emitting diodes by a high-throughput virtual screening and experimental approach. Nat. Mater. 15, 1120–1127 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Chemla, Y., Sweeney, C. J., Wozniak, C. A. & Voigt, C. A. Design and regulation of engineered bacteria for environmental release. Nat. Microbiol. 10, 281–300 (2025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Bloch, S. E. et al. Biological nitrogen fixation in maize: optimizing nitrogenase expression in a root-associated diazotroph. J. Exp. Bot. 71, 4591–4603 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Weininger, D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 28, 31–36 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Riniker, S. & Landrum, G. A. Better informed distance geometry: using what we know to improve conformation generation. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55, 2562–2574 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Halgren, T. A. Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94. J. Comput. Chem. 17, 490–519 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Bannwarth, C., Ehlert, S. & Grimme, S. GFN2-xTB—an accurate and broadly parametrized self-consistent tight-binding quantum chemical method with multipole electrostatics and density-dependent dispersion contributions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 1652–1671 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Cossi, M. & Barone, V. Time-dependent density functional theory for molecules in liquid solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 115, 4708–4717 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Chemla, Y. et al. Parallel engineering of environmental bacteria and performance over years under jungle-simulated conditions. PLoS ONE 17, e0278471 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  122. Johnson, S. C. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika 32, 241–254 (1967).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Jiang, J., Liu, D., Gu, J. & Süsstrunk, S. What is the space of spectral sensitivity functions for digital color cameras? In Proc. 2013 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 168–179 (IEEE, 2013).

  124. Chemla, Y. Hyperspectral reporters for long-distance and wide-area detection of gene expression in living bacteria. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14756888 (2025).

  125. Levin, I. et al. VoigtLab/bioHSI: v.1.0.0. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14827800 (2025).

  126. Levin, I. et al. VoigtLab/npspec-webapp: v1.0.0. Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/14827805 (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was funded by the US Department of Defense Newton Award (MIT 6943892) and the Ministry of Defense of Israel (MIT 4441024394). Engineering of the environmental strains and optimization of the genetically encoded sensors and HSR biosynthetic pathways was funded by the Army Research Office, a directorate of the US Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Army Research Laboratory under Cooperative Agreement Number W911NF-22-2-0210. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of DEVCOM ARL or the US Government. The US Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein. We thank Headwall Photonics for aid with UAV experiments. We also thank E. Perkins and members of the Environmental Laboratory of the US Army Engineer Research and Development Center for their help in field experiments and helpful discussions. We also thank R. Daniel, O. Shoseyov, A. Rudich, S. Belsey, M. Khoury, I. Casif, E. Fleshler, L. Chitayat, M. Soreni-Harari and N. R. for their help in field experiments. We acknowledge the MIT SuperCloud Supercomputing Center for providing high-performance computing resources that have contributed to the research results reported within this paper. Y.C. was supported by the Human Frontier Science Program Long Term Fellowship (LT-702).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.C., I.L. and C.A.V. designed experiments and wrote the paper. Y.C., I.L., Y.F. and A.A.J. performed the experiments. C.W.C., I.L., Y.C. and C.A.V. conceptualized and performed the computational predictions and analyses.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher A. Voigt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Y.C., I.L. and C.A.V. are the inventors of a patent that covers some of the aspects described in the paper. C.A.V. is a founder of, and I.L. is a consultant for, Fieldstone Bio, which has an option for intellectual property from MIT regarding the research described in this paper. A.A.J., C.W.C. and Y.F. declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Biotechnology thanks Shimshon Belkin, Maxwell Wilson and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Biosynthetic accessibility of metabolites across different species.

These figures were calculated the same way as Fig. 2c (Methods). Purple and blue points are biliverdin IXα and bacteriochlorophyll a, respectively. The lighter colored points are their structural analogs (Extended Data Fig. 2).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Structural analogs of biliverdin-IX α and bacteriochlorophyll a.

The color scheme corresponds to Fig. 2c and d, Extended Data Fig. 1, and Supplementary Fig. 5.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Surface cell concentration limit-of-detection of HSRs.

Note that the limit-of-detection will be dependent on the specific camera and distance from the bacteria. Known concentrations of bacteria added to filter surfaces and imaged by a VNIR hyperspectral camera (Headwall E-Series) from 0.5 m (Methods). a. RGB and classified images extracted from the HSI data for constitutively-produced SmURFP(biliverdin IXα) (E. coli pYC301). b. Dependence of signal on the cell density. The limit-of-detection is marked with the vertical dashed line. The data points represent three replicates. The mean classification score indicates that it was averaged over the area of each well. c. Statistical significance of the signal in the presence compared to the absence of cells. p-values were calculated for the mean classification scores of 0.0 CFU/mm2 and each cell density, using one-sided Student t-test with equal variance. The horizontal line is the threshold used to define significant (p-value = 0.05). d. Mean reflectance spectra as a function of cell density. The absorption peak at 925 nm is due to the filter material. e. RGB and classified images extracted from the HSI data for cells constitutively producing bacteriochlorophyll a (R. gelatinosus YF6). f. Dependence of signal on the cell density. The limit-of-detection is marked with the vertical dashed line. The data points represent three replicates. g. Statistical significance of the signal in the presence compared to the absence of cells. p-values were calculated for the mean classification scores of 0.0 CFU/mm2 and each cell density, using one-sided Student t-test with equal variance. h. Reflectance spectra as a function of cell density. The data points are three replicates.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 pC-HSL response functions measured by HSR and a fluorescent reporter.

a. Schematics of genetic sensors connected to the different reporters. Plasmids are detailed in Supplementary Fig. 6 and genetic parts in Supplementary Table 1. b. The response functions as measured with the two reporters. In both cases, cells were grown with different concentrations of inducers (Methods). The pC-HSL sensor connected to YFP (E. coli pYC303) was imaged using a fluorimeter and background fluorescence (fluorescence of the pellets at inducer concentration = 0) was subtracted. The lines are fits to Eq. 6 (HSR: K = 2.2 nM, n = 1.1, YFP: K = 15.4 nM, n = 1.2). The data points are three replicates.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Dependence of HSR detection on light intensity.

R. gelatinosus YF10 cultures were grown in the presence of 3OH-C14-HSL at the indicated concentration and then spread on 7 g of sand (Methods). Light intensity was set using a tunable quartz-tungsten illumination unit (Headwall Photonics) and measured using a handheld illuminance meter. a. RGB (left) and classified (right) images at different light intensities. The images are representative of three replicates. b. Response curves measured at different light intensities. The lines are fits to Eq. 6 (parameters in table). The “mean” indicates that the classification scores were averaged over the surface of each plate. The data points are three replicates. c. Dynamic range as a function of light intensity. The dynamic range was calculated as the ratio between the mean classification score for the maximally induced and uninduced samples. The data points are three replicates. d. The half-maximum induction K as a function of light intensity. Values were calculated from the best fit of Eq. 6. Points are only shown if the fit is significant. e. Limit-of-detection as a function of light intensity. The data points are three replicates. f. The limit-of-detection was calculated as the minimum concentration above which all calculated p-values were less than 0.01. p-values were calculated at each inducer concentration between the mean classification scores of the induced replicates and uninduced replicates using the one-sided Student t-test with equal variance. Points are not shown if no concentration met the significance threshold. The data points are three replicates.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Limit-of-detection of R. gelatinosus (Bacteriochlorophyll a) on different soils.

Data are shown for R. gelatinosus YF6, which constitutively produces Bacteriochlorophyll a. a. Schematic illustrating the locations where 10 µL of cultures with varying concentrations were pipetted onto different soil types (A1, A3, A5, A7). b. RGB images from HSI data. c. Classified images from the HSI data. The dashed blue boxes indicate regions analyzed that do not contain bacteria. Classification scores in panel d are the means in the areas marked by rectangles. d. Classification scores extracted from panel c. P-values were calculated using one-sided student t-test with n = 3 (equal variance). Blue dashed regions in panels b and c only contain soil (OD600 = 0.0) and were used for the t-test. Significance scores: *** (p-value < 0.005), ** (p-value < 0.01), * (p-value < 0.05), ns (not significant). The data points are three replicates.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 iPhone camera imaging of SmURFP(biliverdin IXα) on sand.

a. Representative image collected of the same samples in Supplementary Fig. 12 using the iPhone 14 Pro 48-megapixel main camera. b. Responses to pC-HSL measured from each plate from the image’s red, green, and blue channels. The means were calculated by averaging over the area of each plate. The intensity measured in each channel can range from 0 to 254. The data points are three replicates. c. The same image from panel a with brightness and contrast values increased using Adobe Photoshop (v. 25.3.1). d. Responses to pC-HSL measured from the altered image. e. The same image from panel a with the “Find edges” filter applied in Photoshop to all color channels or to single color channels after decomposition of the image into red, green, and blue color channels. No response was successfully extracted from the iPhone camera image with or without additional processing. No other manipulations or enhancements of the color channels in the RGB image led to observable HSR.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 UAV acquisition of HSI data to detect bacteriochlorophyll a from 24 m.

R. gelatinosus WT, YF6 (constitutive bacteriochlorophyll a), and AJ1 (repressed bacteriochlorophyll a) cultures were grown to OD600 = 4.0 (Methods). Cultures were diluted using growth media or concentrated using centrifugation and resuspension in growth media to achieve different OD600 of culture cell density added to soil. 300 mL of each culture was then sprayed on 1.5 kg locally-sourced sandy soil inside each 35 ×30 cm plastic container. Containers were then placed in a field in a closed area near Herzliya, Israel. Imaging was performed with a VNIR-SWIR (400-2500 nm) UAV hyperspectral camera (Co-Aligned HP Hyperspectral Imaging UAV and camera, Headwall) from 24 m. Using SpectralView III, reflectance correction was performed based on the calibration tarp and geo-orthorectification was performed to correct for image distortions from the flight movement. a. Picture showing a close-up of the UAV imaging system and the containers in the background. b. RGB image from the HSI data. c. Classified image from the HSI. d. Locations of different R. gelatinosus strains and their concentrations used in the experiment. The AJ1 strain was used at OD600 = 4.0. The six concentrations in the center box correspond to the wild-type strain; the two concentrations flanking the box (left and right) correspond to the YF6 strain. e. Uncropped RGB image. f. Uncropped classified image. The image in panels e and f covers 0.2 acres (800 m2).

Extended Data Fig. 9 UAV acquisition of HSI data to measure the 3OH-C14-HSL sensor response function from 54 m using bacteriochlorophyll a.

The uncropped image corresponding to Fig. 4f is shown. R. gelatinosus YF10 cultures were grown in the presence of 3OH-C14-HSL and spread on sand inside 35 × 30 cm plastic containers (Methods). In each container, 1 kg sand was covered by 300 mL of culture (OD600 = 4.0). Containers were then placed in a field in a closed area near Rehovot, Israel for 18 hours, out of which it was exposed to the sun for 4 hours prior to imaging. The temperature range was 25 – 35 °C. Imaging was performed with a VNIR-SWIR (400 - 2500 nm) UAV hyperspectral camera (Co-Aligned HP Hyperspectral Imaging UAV and camera, Headwall) from 54 m. The image encompasses a total area of 0.74 acres (3000 m2). Image acquisition required 30 sec. Using SpectralView III, reflectance correction was performed based on the calibration tarp and geo-orthorectification was performed to correct for image distortions from the flight movement. a. RGB image extracted from the HSI data. b. Classified image extracted from HSI data. c. 864 nm image extracted from HSI data. d. Pixel absorption at 864 nm with different thresholds used to label pixels as containing HSR are shown. Values in the heatmap (panel c) greater than the threshold were labeled as containing the HSR (red) and values equal to or less than the threshold were labeled as not containing the HSR (gray). True and false positive rates were calculated as described in the methods. e. Classified HSI images are shown at different threshold values. Values in the heatmap (panel b) greater than the threshold were labeled as containing HSR (red) and values equal to or less than the threshold were labeled as not containing HSR (gray). True and false positive rates were calculated as described in the methods. The bottom images are enlarged images of the area marked by the white rectangles in the top images. The black rectangles in the bottom images mark the areas in the image where R. gelatinosus YF10 was added onto sand. The mean classification scores in Fig. 4g were calculated by averaging over the area of each rectangle.

Extended Data Fig. 10 Measurement of the 3OH-C14-HSL sensor response function from 90 m using bacteriochlorophyll a.

These data correspond to Fig. 4j using R. gelatinosus YF10. The top image shows the whole area shown in Fig. 4h. The bottom images are enlarged images of the area marked by the white rectangles in the top images. The black rectangle in the bottom images marks the area in the image where R. gelatinosus YF10 was added onto 1 kg of sand. The sand covered a 1 cm deep filter disc (60 mm) treated with 800 µL of 19 mM 3OH-C14-HSL (final concentration of 50 µM/mL culture). a. RGB image calculated from HSI data. b. 864 nm image calculated from HSI data. c. Data used to calculate the ROC curve for 864 nm (Fig. 4j). Pixel absorption at 864 nm with different thresholds used to label pixels as containing HSR are shown. Values in the heatmap (panel b) greater than the threshold were labeled as containing HSR (red) and values equal to or less than the threshold were labeled as not containing HSR (gray). Images represent four of 470,044 threshold values evaluated to compute the ROC curve (Methods). d. Data used to calculate the classified ROC curve (Fig. 4j). Classified HSI images are shown at different threshold values taken along the ROC curve. Values in the classified image (Fig. 4h) greater than the threshold were labeled as containing HSR (red) and values equal to or less than the threshold were labeled as not containing HSR (gray). Images represent four of 1,015,973 threshold values evaluated to compute the ROC curve (Methods).

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–14, Tables 1–3 and References.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Data 1

Predicted spectra for natural metabolites.

Source data

Source Data Figs. 1–4

Source data for Figs. 1e,f, 2c,d, 3c–g and 4c,d,g–i.

Source Data Extended Data Figs. 1 and 3–7

Source data for Extended Data Figs. 1, 3a,c,d,f–h, 4b, 5b,d–f, 6d and 7b,d.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chemla, Y., Levin, I., Fan, Y. et al. Hyperspectral reporters for long-distance and wide-area detection of gene expression in living bacteria. Nat Biotechnol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02622-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-025-02622-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research