The Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) ibrutinib effectively blocks downstream B-cell receptor activation and has demonstrated clinical efficacy both as monotherapy and in combination with immunochemotherapy in patients with central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) [1, 2]. Beyond its direct effect on lymphoma cells, ibrutinib regulates the tumor microenvironment (TME) and enhances T-cell immunity and function in systemic B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [3, 4]. However, its impact on the tumor immune landscape of B-cell lymphomas within immune-privileged sites like the CNS remains largely unexplored, primarily due to challenges associated with the availability of appropriate CNS lymphoma tissue following ibrutinib treatment.
In this study, we used human slice cultures from a CNSL patient undergoing complete brain tumor resection due to a suspected glioblastoma to investigate the influence of ibrutinib treatment on the lymphoma immune microenvironment, particularly focusing on the myeloid cell compartment. We performed comprehensive genetic and transcriptional profiling as well as single nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-Seq) of the bulk FFPE tumor and CNSL slice cultures, which were processed according to a previously established approach and subjected to treatment over five consecutive days either with ibrutinib solved in DMSO (‘ibrutinib-treated’), DMSO alone (‘DMSO control’), or remained untreated (‘untreated’) (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Methods) [5]. Genetic analyses of the bulk tumor by targeted deep sequencing and shallow whole genome sequencing revealed the presence of CNSL-specific single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number aberrations (CNAs), including mutations in MYD88, CD79B, PIM1, OSBPL10, and TBL1XR1 genes (mean allele frequency [AF] = 38%) as well as gains of 9p24 (PD-L1) and losses of 6p21 (HLA-D) or 1p13 (CD58), which have been associated with immune evasion in CNSL [6] (Fig. 1A, Supplementary Tables 1, 2). The tumor was classified as an activated B-cell like (ABC) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and assigned to the MCD subtype and LE1 ecotype, which both are typically associated with an ABC cell-of-origin [7,8,9] (Supplementary Table 3). Clonal rearrangements of immunoglobulin genes were predicted to be IGHV4-59 for the heavy chain and IGKV3-29 for the light chain [10]. Importantly, the majority of tumor-intrinsic genetic aberrations were also present in DNA isolated from the slice cultures, confirming the presence of the same malignant B-cell clone in the individual culture conditions, with mean AFs ranging from 1.05% in the ibrutinib-treated to 4.96% in the untreated slices (Fig. 1A, Supplementary Tables 1, 2). We generated pseudo-H&E images from tumor sections using Stimulated Raman Histology, demonstrating that a small proportion of the slide was infiltrated with lymphoma cells, which mirrors the low mutant AFs detected by slice culture DNA sequencing in comparison to the bulk tumor (Fig. 1B).
A Copy number (left) and mutational (right) profile of the FFPE-embedded tumor and tumor slices treated with three different conditions. Selected genes in chromosomal regions with losses (green) or gains (red) are annotated. For the heatmaps, only missense and nonsense mutations were considered, the full genetic profile is listed in the Supplementary Table 1. AF, allele frequency; FFPE, formalin fixed paraffin embedded; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide. B Stimulated Raman Histology image of the tumor slice (left). The malignant B-cell proportion is highlighted by a black circle. Further, a UMAP of the integrated snRNA-Seq data of all tumor slices is shown (right). CNSL, central nervous system lymphoma; UMAP, uniform manifold approximation and projection. C UMAP of the snRNA-Seq dataset across each individual slice culture condition, colored by the annotated cell clusters. Further, a violin plot of the ABC (activated B-cell) / GCB (germinal center B-cell) expression scores obtained by bulkRNA sequencing across all cells in the B-cell cluster is shown. Dashed line, Median; Dotted line, 25–75th percentile within each violin plot. DMSO dimethyl sulfoxide, UMAP uniform manifold approximation and projection.
Next, we performed snRNA-Seq from slices of all three conditions (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Methods). In total, 12,173 nuclei passed quality control and were further analyzed by data integration to identify the presence of distinct cell types (Fig. 1B, Supplementary Table 4, Supplementary Fig. 2A–C, Supplementary Methods). Nine major cell types could be distinguished, with oligodendrocytes (34%), neurons (19.8%), and myeloid cells (16.3%) representing the most abundant cell populations, while B-cells were present in 1.2% of the total cell pool, mirroring the fractional abundance of malignant genetic aberrations in the slice cultures (Fig. 1B, Supplementary Fig. 2C). Importantly, this cell composition was largely maintained in all individual culture conditions (Fig. 1C, Supplementary Fig. 2C); yet, the ibrutinib-treated slices revealed no B-cells by snRNA-Seq despite the detection of lymphoma-specific mutations by targeted DNA sequencing (Fig. 1A, C, Supplementary Fig. 2C). B-cells from the integrated dataset showed high expression of genes associated with the ABC DLBCL subtype, consistent with the results of the Hans algorithm (Fig. 1C).
The myeloid cell compartment has emerged as a crucial population for modulating tumor immune responses in other brain cancer types and constitutes a significant component in our snRNA-Seq analyses [11]. Therefore, we next focused on the characterization of the myeloid cells to explore the specific effect of ibrutinib treatment on this population in CNSL. Five distinct clusters (C1-C5) within the myeloid compartment were defined based on expression profiles (Fig. 2A, Supplementary Fig. 3A–C, Supplementary Table 5). Importantly, the representation of these clusters was significantly different in ibrutinib-treated slices compared to the two control conditions, with markedly increased antigen-presenting (cluster C2) and decreased SPP-1-expressing cell populations (cluster C1, Fig. 2A, Supplementary Fig. 3D). Pseudotime analysis of the integrated myeloid cell compartment revealed two differentiation branches, one leading to SPP1-expressing cells (C1) and the other to the antigen-presenting cell state (C2, Fig. 2B). Expression level comparisons of SPP1 and genes that represent the antigen-presenting subpopulation (CIITA, HLA-DMB) showed significant differences between the ibrutinib-treated slices and slices of the control conditions (Fig. 2C, Supplementary Table 5). Collectively, these data indicate a modulatory effect of ibrutinib on the myeloid cell compartment in CNSL, shifting cells from an SPP1-expressing immunosuppressive phenotype to an immune-stimulating state.
A UMAP showing the five different subclusters (C1–C5) identified within the myeloid cluster of the CNSL tumor slices (integrated dataset). The proportion of cells per subcluster among the total number of myeloid cells for each treatment condition is shown as a bar graph. UMAP, uniform manifold approximation and projection; DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide. B UMAP of the myeloid compartment colored by pseudotime. Pseudotime trajectories are shown as black lines. UMAP, uniform manifold approximation and projection. C Rainbow plots of marker genes of the antigen-presenting myeloid subcluster (CIITA, HLA-DMB) and the SPP1 subcluster comparing the pseudo-bulk expression level of these genes among the three treatment conditions. Each plot shows the median, 25–75th percentile, and range of expression levels. DMSO, dimethyl sulfoxide.
To validate our findings, we collected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from a CNSL patient with leptomeningeal infiltration experiencing disease progression after ibrutinib monotherapy (Supplementary Fig. 4A, Supplementary Table 6). We applied snRNA-Seq to 1,995 cells isolated from CSF and identified three distinct clusters, with myeloid cells representing 0.7% of the total cell pool (Supplementary Fig. 4B, C). These myeloid cells expressed high levels of CIITA and HLA-DMB, while SPP1 expression remained low, reflecting the phenomena observed in the CNSL slice cultures treated with ibrutinib (Supplementary Fig. 4D). As a separate validation experiment, we further cultured non-malignant cortical slices from a patient undergoing epilepsy surgery under the same three treatment conditions and applied snRNA-Seq to a total of 4,134 cells (Supplementary Fig. 5A–C). Quantification of myeloid cell subclusters revealed a reduction of SPP1-expressing cells in cluster C1 and increase of cells with an antigen-presenting phenotype (C2) in ibrutinib-treated slices, aligning with the results from the CNSL slice culture experiments (Supplementary Fig. 5D). However, the effect appeared rather moderate, suggesting an underlying lymphoma-independent ibrutinib effect on the myeloid compartment that might be enhanced by lymphoma infiltration (Supplementary Fig. 5D, E).
In conclusion, we here present a single slice culture model analysis demonstrating a modulatory effect of ibrutinib on the myeloid cell compartment of the brain, redirecting SPP1-expressing myeloid cells, known for their largely immunosuppressive properties, to an antigen-presenting phenotype that is commonly associated with immune-stimulatory characteristics [12, 13]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an analysis investigating human CNSL tissue and its TME following BTKi therapy. In CLL, various research studies have explored the role of ibrutinib on the immune environment, describing an enhanced T-cell immunity and improved cytotoxic T-cell response as a consequence of irreversible inducible T-cell kinase (ITK) inhibition, contributing to its therapeutic effect in this B-cell lymphoma subtype [3, 4]. The immune landscape of CNSL differs remarkably from extracerebral B-cell lymphoma entities due to its localization within an immune-privileged organ [14]. Yet, obtaining tissue samples suitable for comprehensive TME profiling in CNSL represents a considerable challenge, as repeated biopsies are typically not performed in relapse situations in clinical practice, and moreover, stereotactic biopsies generally yield only minute tumor fragments, which are usually insufficient for extensive TME analyses. Therefore, patient-derived tumor slice cultures presented a unique opportunity to explore the CNSL TME longitudinally in response to ibrutinib treatment in this study. Warranting further validation, our observations might have therapeutic implications for CNSL patients. The findings suggest a biological mechanism that supports the concomitant use of ibrutinib in the context of CAR T-cell therapies through the engagement of an immunostimulatory myeloid TME in CNSL [13, 15]. In fact, clinical trials assessing the efficacy of CAR T-cells in PCNSL encourage continuation of ibrutinib treatment up until 3 months after CAR T-cell infusion [15]. Although the results presented here are promising, our study is inherently limited by this single-case analysis and culture conditions that might not fully capture the complexity of human brain processes. Therefore, it should be interpreted with caution, and further validation experiments in xenograft mouse models or human tissue obtained after BTKi treatment are needed to substantiate our findings and overcome the limitations associated with this solitary observation. Moreover, the scarcity of T-cell subpopulations within the individual slice culture conditions precluded comprehensive exploration of the T-cell compartment and its interactions with myeloid cells, omitting an important component of the CNSL TME from our analysis.
In summary, based on a unique human slice culture model from primary CNSL tissue, our data suggest a modulating effect of ibrutinib on the myeloid compartment in human CNSL by shifting myeloid cells from an immunosuppressive phenotype expressing SPP1 to an antigen-presenting cell state, indicating an unknown immune-activating effect of ibrutinib on the brain TME with potential further implications on combinatory treatment strategies involving ibrutinib together with CAR T-cell therapies.
Data availability
Tumor mutational data and other relevant data are provided in the Supplementary Data. Owing to restrictions related to the dissemination of germline sequence information included in the informed consent forms used to enroll study subjects, we are unable to provide access to raw sequencing data. Reasonable requests for additional data will be reviewed by the authors to determine whether they can be fulfilled in accordance with these privacy restrictions.
References
Soussain C, Choquet S, Blonski M, Leclercq D, Houillier C, Rezai K, et al. Ibrutinib monotherapy for relapse or refractory primary CNS lymphoma and primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: Final analysis of the phase II ‘proof-of-concept’ iLOC study by the Lymphoma study association (LYSA) and the French oculo-cerebral lymphoma (LOC) network. Eur J Cancer. 2019;117:121–30.
Lauer EM, Waterhouse M, Braig M, Mutter J, Bleul S, Duque-Afonso J, et al. Ibrutinib in patients with relapsed/refractory central nervous system lymphoma: a retrospective single-centre analysis. Br J Haematol. 2020;190:e110–e4.
Dubovsky JA, Beckwith KA, Natarajan G, Woyach JA, Jaglowski S, Zhong Y, et al. Ibrutinib is an irreversible molecular inhibitor of ITK driving a Th1-selective pressure in T lymphocytes. Blood. 2013;122:2539–49.
Long M, Beckwith K, Do P, Mundy BL, Gordon A, Lehman AM, et al. Ibrutinib treatment improves T cell number and function in CLL patients. J Clin Invest. 2017;127:3052–64.
Ravi VM, Joseph K, Wurm J, Behringer S, Garrelfs N, d’Errico P, et al. Human organotypic brain slice culture: a novel framework for environmental research in neuro-oncology. Life Sci Alliance. 2019;2:e201900305.
Radke J, Ishaque N, Koll R, Gu Z, Schumann E, Sieverling L, et al. The genomic and transcriptional landscape of primary central nervous system lymphoma. Nat Commun. 2022;13:2558.
Wright GW, Huang DW, Phelan JD, Coulibaly ZA, Roulland S, Young RM, et al. A probabilistic classification tool for genetic subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma with therapeutic implications. Cancer Cell. 2020;37:551–68.e14.
Hans CP, Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC, Gascoyne RD, Delabie J, Ott G, et al. Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray. Blood. 2004;103:275–82.
Steen CB, Luca BA, Esfahani MS, Azizi A, Sworder BJ, Nabet BY, et al. The landscape of tumor cell states and ecosystems in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell. 2021;39:1422–37.e10.
Bolotin DA, Poslavsky S, Mitrophanov I, Shugay M, Mamedov IZ, Putintseva EV, et al. MiXCR: software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling. Nat Methods. 2015;12:380–1.
Hambardzumyan D, Gutmann DH, Kettenmann H. The role of microglia and macrophages in glioma maintenance and progression. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19:20–7.
Tang W, Lo CWS, Ma W, Chu ATW, Tong AHY, Chung BHY. Revealing the role of SPP1. Cell Biosci. 2024;14:37.
Bourbon E, Sesques P, Gossez M, Tordo J, Ferrant E, Safar V, et al. HLA-DR expression on monocytes and outcome of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for large B-cell lymphoma. Blood Adv. 2023;7:744–55.
Alame M, Cornillot E, Cacheux V, Rigau V, Costes-Martineau V, Lacheretz-Szablewski V, et al. The immune contexture of primary central nervous system diffuse large B cell lymphoma associates with patient survival and specific cell signaling. Theranostics. 2021;11:3565–79.
Frigault MJ, Dietrich J, Gallagher K, Roschewski M, Jordan JT, Forst D, et al. Safety and efficacy of tisagenlecleucel in primary CNS lymphoma: a phase 1/2 clinical trial. Blood. 2022;139:2306–15.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung (to F.S.), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHE1870/3-1, to F.S.), the Mertelsmann Foundation (to F.S.), the Berta-Ottenstein Programm Förderlinie Clinician Scientist (to J.K., N.N.N.) and the Advanced Clinician Scientist Program of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Innere Medizin (to F.S.). R.S. is supported by the IMMediate Advanced Clinician Scientist-Program, Department of Medicine II, Medical Center – University of Freiburg and Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, funded by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, Federal Ministry of Education and Research) – 01EO2103. Furthermore, R.S. is supported by the Fritz Thyssen Foundation and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-1479 – Project ID: 441891347). D.H.H. received funding from the TRANSCAN (BMBF 01KT2328), German Research Foundation (Heisenberg Program DFG HE 8145/6-1, funding, HE 8145/5-1), the DKTK Partner Site Freiburg (DKTK-PI) and Joint Funding Program (HematoTrac). We thank the Lighthouse Core Facility and FREEZE biobank Freiburg for supporting this study. The Lighthouse Core Facility is funded in part by the Medical Faculty, University of Freiburg (Project Numbers 2023/A2-Fol; 2021/B3-Fol), the DKTK, and the DFG (Project Number 450392965).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JCK, NNN, DHH, and FS developed the concept, designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. JCK, NNN, JZ, and FS performed the experiments. JCK, JM, SA, CK, FH, LR, MD, AA, RS, DHH, FS analyzed and helped interpreting data. JCK, NNN, JZ, JB, MP, JD, RS, DHH, FS provided study material, enrolled patients, and collected clinical data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
J.C.K. does not report any conflicts of interest. F.S. receives research funding from Gilead Sciences, Roche Sequencing Solutions, and Takeda, and received Honoraria by AstraZeneca and Servier. All other authors do not report any conflicts of interest in relation to this manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All analyses and methods in this manuscript have been performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. All participants provided informed consent for sample collection and data analysis. Tumor and CSF samples from three different patients were obtained after written informed consent for the experiments performed in this study, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the local ethics committee of the University of Freiburg, Germany (registration numbers: DRKS00015307, 23-1234-S1, 23-1233-S1).
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kuehn, J.C., Neidert, N.N., Zhang, J. et al. The effect of ibrutinib on the myeloid cell compartment in CNS lymphoma. Leukemia 39, 1532–1535 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-025-02600-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-025-02600-y

