Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Cell Death & Disease
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. cell death & disease
  3. articles
  4. article
Sec8: a novel positive regulator of RIG-I in anti-RNA viral defense
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 January 2026

Sec8: a novel positive regulator of RIG-I in anti-RNA viral defense

  • Lin Wang1 na1,
  • Wenqing Ma1 na1,
  • Peili Hou1 na1,
  • Rong Jin1,
  • Xinxin Wei1,
  • Xingyu Li1,
  • Daniel Chang He2,
  • Hongmei Wang1 &
  • …
  • Hongbin He  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-7438-06381 

Cell Death & Disease , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 440 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • RIG-I-like receptors
  • Ubiquitylation

Abstract

Sec8, an exocyst complex subunit, is pivotal in facilitating the docking of exocytic vesicles to fusion sites on the plasma membrane. However, its involvement in the antiviral innate immune response and virus replication remains unclear. In this study, Sec8 is identified as a novel positive regulator of RIG-I, enhancing the IFN-I signaling response against RNA viruses both in vivo and in vitro. Additionally, Sec8 stabilizes RIG-I by inhibiting its ubiquitination and subsequent proteasome-mediated degradation. Mechanistically, STUB1 degrades RIG-I via K48-linked ubiquitination at Lys190, while Sec8 suppresses STUB1 mRNA by reducing the expression of p53 and competes with STUB1 for binding to RIG-I’s CARD domain, thereby preventing STUB1-mediated RIG-I degradation. Importantly, Sec8-deficient mice were more susceptible to RNA virus infection compared to wild-type mice. These findings elucidate a mechanism that Sec8 positively regulates RIG-I in the antiviral innate immune response, offering insights for developing novel therapeutic strategies and targeted antiviral medications.

Similar content being viewed by others

Dual effects of the alternative spliced RIG-I isoform PTIR1 on host antiviral defense and immune homeostasis

Article Open access 10 November 2025

CD97 negatively regulates the innate immune response against RNA viruses by promoting RNF125-mediated RIG-I degradation

Article 17 November 2023

Distinct mechanisms of long-term virologic control in two HIV-infected individuals after treatment interruption of anti-retroviral therapy

Article 28 October 2021

Data availability

The authors declare that all data on which the conclusions of this study are based can be found in the paper and its Supplementary Information document, or can be obtained from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Gürtler C, Bowie AG. Innate immune detection of microbial nucleic acids. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21:413–20.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang H, Hou P, Wang X, Xiang A, Wu H, Qi W, et al. CD97 negatively regulates the innate immune response against RNA viruses by promoting RNF125-mediated RIG-I degradation. Cell Mol Immunol. 2023;20:1457–71.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chow KT, Gale M Jr, Loo YM. RIG-I and other RNA sensors in antiviral immunity. Annu Rev Immunol. 2018;36:667–94.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thoresen D, Wang W, Galls D, Guo R, Xu L, Pyle AM. The molecular mechanism of RIG-I activation and signaling. Immunol Rev. 2021;304:154–68.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kowalinski E, Lunardi T, McCarthy AA, Louber J, Brunel J, Grigorov B, et al. Structural basis for the activation of innate immune pattern-recognition receptor RIG-I by viral RNA. Cell. 2011;147:423–35.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kong X, Lu X, Wang S, Hao J, Guo D, Wu H, et al. Type I interferon/STAT1 signaling regulates UBE2M-mediated antiviral innate immunity in a negative feedback manner. Cell Rep. 2023;42:112002.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shen Y, Tang K, Chen D, Hong M, Sun F, Wang S, et al. Riok3 inhibits the antiviral immune response by facilitating TRIM40-mediated RIG-I and MDA5 degradation. Cell Rep. 2021;35:109272.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oshiumi H. Recent advances and contradictions in the study of the individual roles of ubiquitin ligases that regulate RIG-I-like receptor-mediated antiviral innate immune responses. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1296.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yan J, Li Q, Mao AP, Hu MM, Shu HB. TRIM4 modulates type I interferon induction and cellular antiviral response by targeting RIG-I for K63-linked ubiquitination. J Mol Cell Biol. 2014;6:154–63.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gack MU, Shin YC, Joo CH, Urano T, Liang C, Sun L, et al. TRIM25 RING-finger E3 ubiquitin ligase is essential for RIG-I-mediated antiviral activity. Nature. 2007;446:916–20.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuniyoshi K, Takeuchi O, Pandey S, Satoh T, Iwasaki H, Akira S, et al. Pivotal role of RNA-binding E3 ubiquitin ligase MEX3C in RIG-I-mediated antiviral innate immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:5646–51.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oshiumi H, Matsumoto M, Hatakeyama S, Seya T. Riplet/RNF135, a RING finger protein, ubiquitinates RIG-I to promote interferon-beta induction during the early phase of viral infection. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:807–17.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin W, Zhang J, Lin H, Li Z, Sun X, Xin D, et al. Syndecan-4 negatively regulates antiviral signalling by mediating RIG-I deubiquitination via CYLD. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11848.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yao X, Zhong L, Wang M, Wang M, Han Y, Wang Y, et al. Up-regulated lncRNA CYLD as a ceRNA of miR-2383 facilitates bovine viral diarrhea virus replication by promoting CYLD expression to counteract RIG-I-mediated type-I IFN production. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;253:127351.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fan Y, Mao R, Yu Y, Liu S, Shi Z, Cheng J, et al. USP21 negatively regulates antiviral response by acting as a RIG-I deubiquitinase. J Exp Med. 2014;211:313–28.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arimoto K, Takahashi H, Hishiki T, Konishi H, Fujita T, Shimotohno K. Negative regulation of the RIG-I signaling by the ubiquitin ligase RNF125. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:7500–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhou P, Ding X, Wan X, Liu L, Yuan X, Zhang W, et al. MLL5 suppresses antiviral innate immune response by facilitating STUB1-mediated RIG-I degradation. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1243.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen W, Han C, Xie B, Hu X, Yu Q, Shi L, et al. Induction of Siglec-G by RNA viruses inhibits the innate immune response by promoting RIG-I degradation. Cell. 2013;152:467–78.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao C, Jia M, Song H, Yu Z, Wang W, Li Q, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM40 attenuates antiviral immune responses by targeting MDA5 and RIG-I. Cell Rep. 2017;21:1613–23.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ranjan P, Singh N, Kumar A, Neerincx A, Kremmer E, Cao W, et al. NLRC5 interacts with RIG-I to induce a robust antiviral response against influenza virus infection. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45:758–72.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mei K, Li Y, Wang S, Shao G, Wang J, Ding Y, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the exocyst complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2018;25:139–46.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Halim DO, Munson M, Gao FB. The exocyst complex in neurological disorders. Hum Genet. 2023;142:1263–70.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bhuvanakantham R, Ng ML. West Nile virus and dengue virus capsid protein negates the antiviral activity of human Sec3 protein through the proteasome pathway. Cell Microbiol. 2013;15:1688–706.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yi R, Hashimoto R, Sakamoto A, Matsumura Y, Nagao M, Takahashi K, et al. Exocyst complex component 2 is a potential host factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. iScience. 2022;25:105427.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Li PH, He JY, Cai YJ, Wei YS, Zhu XL, Yang JD, et al. Molecular cloning, inducible expression and function analysis of Epinephelus coioides Sec6 response to SGIV infection. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2022;124:462–71.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mei K, Guo W. The exocyst complex. Curr Biol. 2018;28:R922–25.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tanaka T, Iino M, Goto K. Knockdown of Sec8 enhances the binding affinity of c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)-interacting protein 4 for mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 4 (MKK4) and suppresses the phosphorylation of MKK4, p38, and JNK, thereby inhibiting apoptosis. FEBS J. 2014;281:5237–50.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tanaka T, Goto K, Iino M. Sec8 modulates TGF-beta-induced EMT by controlling N-cadherin via regulation of Smad3/4. Cell Signal. 2017;29:115–26.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Li H, Fu X, Zhao J, Li C, Li L, Xia P, et al. EXOC4 promotes diffuse-type gastric cancer metastasis via activating FAK signal. Mol Cancer Res. 2022;20:1021–34.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lin VC, Huang CY, Lee YC, Yu CC, Chang TY, Lu TL, et al. Genetic variations in TP53 binding sites are predictors of clinical outcomes in prostate cancer patients. Arch Toxicol. 2014;88:901–11.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Liebl FL, Chen K, Karr J, Sheng Q, Featherstone DE. Increased synaptic microtubules and altered synapse development in Drosophila sec8 mutants. BMC Biol. 2005;3:27.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Friedrich GA, Hildebrand JD, Soriano P. The secretory protein Sec8 is required for paraxial mesoderm formation in the mouse. Dev Biol. 1997;192:364–74.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dittmar G, Winklhofer KF. Linear ubiquitin chains: cellular functions and strategies for detection and quantification. Front Chem. 2019;7:915.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao K, Zhang Q, Li X, Zhao D, Liu Y, Shen Q, et al. Cytoplasmic STAT4 promotes antiviral type I IFN production by blocking CHIP-mediated degradation of RIG-I. J Immunol. 2016;196:1209–17.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jenkins LM, Durell SR, Mazur SJ, Appella E. p53 N-terminal phosphorylation: a defining layer of complex regulation. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:1441–9.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Raj N, Attardi LD. The transactivation domains of the p53 protein. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017;7:a026047.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ruan H, Yu C, Niu X, Zhang W, Liu H, Chen L, et al. Computational strategy for intrinsically disordered protein ligand design leads to the discovery of p53 transactivation domain I binding compounds that activate the p53 pathway. Chem Sci. 2020;12:3004–16.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Xu XX, Wan H, Nie L, Shao T, Xiang LX, Shao JZ. RIG-I: a multifunctional protein beyond a pattern recognition receptor. Protein Cell. 2018;9:246–53.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kato H, Takeuchi O, Sato S, Yoneyama M, Yamamoto M, Matsui K, et al. Differential roles of MDA5 and RIG-I helicases in the recognition of RNA viruses. Nature. 2006;441:101–5.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ma J, Li L, Ma B, Liu T, Wang Z, Ye Q, et al. MYC induces CDK4/6 inhibitors resistance by promoting pRB1 degradation. Nat Commun. 2024;15:1871.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Li T, Zheng C, Han WJ, Chen ZZ. Regulation of STUB1 expression and its biological significance in mouse Sertoli cells. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2022;68:298–313.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Schiattarella GG, Altamirano F, Kim SY, Tong D, Ferdous A, Piristine H, et al. Xbp1s-FoxO1 axis governs lipid accumulation and contractile performance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1684.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Speidel D. Transcription-independent p53 apoptosis: an alternative route to death. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:14–24.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yonish-Rouach E, Choisy C, Deguin V, Breugnot C, May E. The role of p53 as a transcription factor in the induction of apoptosis. Behring Inst Mitt. 1996;60–71.

  45. Kato H, Takeuchi O, Mikamo-Satoh E, Hirai R, Kawai T, Matsushita K, et al. Length-dependent recognition of double-stranded ribonucleic acids by retinoic acid-inducible gene-I and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5. J Exp Med. 2008;205:1601–10.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gitlin L, Barchet W, Gilfillan S, Cella M, Beutler B, Flavell RA, et al. Essential role of mda-5 in type I IFN responses to polyriboinosinic:polyribocytidylic acid and encephalomyocarditis picornavirus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:8459–64.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Alexopoulou L, Holt AC, Medzhitov R, Flavell RA. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature. 2001;413:732–8.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Marques JT, Devosse T, Wang D, Zamanian-Daryoush M, Serbinowski P, Hartmann R, et al. A structural basis for discriminating between self and nonself double-stranded RNAs in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24:559–65.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pichlmair A, Schulz O, Tan CP, Rehwinkel J, Kato H, Takeuchi O, et al. Activation of MDA5 requires higher-order RNA structures generated during virus infection. J Virol. 2009;83:10761–9.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hou J, Han L, Zhao Z, Liu H, Zhang L, Ma C, et al. USP18 positively regulates innate antiviral immunity by promoting K63-linked polyubiquitination of MAVS. Nat Commun. 2021;12:2970.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Li SZ, Shu QP, Song Y, Zhang HH, Liu Y, Jin BX, et al. Phosphorylation of MAVS/VISA by Nemo-like kinase (NLK) for degradation regulates the antiviral innate immune response. Nat Commun. 2019;10:3233.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Song J, Zhao W, Zhang X, Tian W, Zhao X, Ma L, et al. Mutant RIG-I enhances cancer-related inflammation through activation of circRIG-I signaling. Nat Commun. 2022;13:7096.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sun F, Ma W, Wang H, He H. Tegument protein UL3 of bovine herpesvirus 1 suppresses antiviral IFN-I signaling by targeting STING for autophagic degradation. Vet Microbiol. 2024;291:110031.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang S, Yang Z, Bao W, Liu L, You Y, Wang X, et al. SNX10 (sorting nexin 10) inhibits colorectal cancer initiation and progression by controlling autophagic degradation of SRC. Autophagy. 2020;16:735–49.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wang S, Ma X, Guo J, Li F, Chen T, Ma W, et al. DDIT3 antagonizes innate immune response to promote bovine alphaherpesvirus 1 replication via the DDIT3-SQSTM1-STING pathway. Virulence. 2022;13:514–29.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Hou P, Zhao M, He W, He H, Wang H. Cellular microRNA bta-miR-2361 inhibits bovine herpesvirus 1 replication by directly targeting EGR1 gene. Vet Microbiol. 2019;233:174–83.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hou P, Wang X, Wang H, Wang T, Yu Z, Xu C, et al. The ORF7a protein of SARS-CoV-2 initiates autophagy and limits autophagosome-lysosome fusion via degradation of SNAP29 to promote virus replication. Autophagy. 2023;19:551–69.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wang L, Zhang X, Lin ZB, Yang PJ, Xu H, Duan JL, et al. Tripartite motif 16 ameliorates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis by promoting the degradation of phospho-TAK1. Cell Metab. 2021;33:1372–88.e1377.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Li X, Hou P, Ma W, Wang X, Wang H, Yu Z, et al. SARS-CoV-2 ORF10 suppresses the antiviral innate immune response by degrading MAVS through mitophagy. Cell Mol Immunol. 2022;19:67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Chang H, Wu H, Hou P, Aizaz M, Yang R, Xiang A, et al. DLG1 promotes the antiviral innate immune response by inhibiting p62-mediated autophagic degradation of IKKepsilon. J Virol. 2023;97:e0150123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research received partial funding from the National Natural Science Fund of China (Grants 32202772 and 32573338), the Jinan Innovation Team (202228060), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2024MC149), and the Jinan Research Pioneer Workshop (202333059).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Lin Wang, Wenqing Ma, Peili Hou.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ruminant Diseases Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, China

    Lin Wang, Wenqing Ma, Peili Hou, Rong Jin, Xinxin Wei, Xingyu Li, Hongmei Wang & Hongbin He

  2. The College of Arts and Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

    Daniel Chang He

Authors
  1. Lin Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wenqing Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peili Hou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rong Jin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xinxin Wei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xingyu Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Daniel Chang He
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hongmei Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hongbin He
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HBH and HMW conceived the study; LW designed and conducted the experiments, analyzed the data, and drafted the initial manuscript; RJ and XXW carried out the majority of the immunoblotting and qPCR experiments; XYL performed the dual-luciferase reporter experiments; DCH explored and constructed the recombinant plasmids of Sec8; WQM and PLH contributed to editing and revising the draft. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hongmei Wang or Hongbin He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

6–8 weeks old C57BL/6 (B6) mice, both Sec8fl/fl and Lyz2-Cre Sec8fl/fl mice were used in the experiments. All animal experiments were conducted strictly with the Regulations on the Administration of Experimental Animal Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, established by the State Council on November 1, 1988, as approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Shandong Normal University (Ethics approval number: AEECSDNU2023070). All experiments were conducted with the informed consent of all participants.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Edited by Professor Mauro Piacentini

Supplementary information

Supplementary index

Original source data for Western blot

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Ma, W., Hou, P. et al. Sec8: a novel positive regulator of RIG-I in anti-RNA viral defense. Cell Death Dis (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-026-08414-9

Download citation

  • Received: 28 February 2025

  • Revised: 11 December 2025

  • Accepted: 21 January 2026

  • Published: 24 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-026-08414-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open access publishing
  • Contact
  • For Advertisers
  • Press Releases
  • About the Partner
  • Upcoming Conferences

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Cell Death & Disease (Cell Death Dis)

ISSN 2041-4889 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited