Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Cell Death & Disease
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. cell death & disease
  3. articles
  4. article
Preclinical profiling of antibody drug conjugates targeting oncofetal chondroitin sulfate
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 24 January 2026

Preclinical profiling of antibody drug conjugates targeting oncofetal chondroitin sulfate

  • Ann Skafte  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0006-1024-22241,2,
  • Elena Ethel Vidal-Calvo  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9655-21061,
  • Swati Choudhary1,2,
  • Joana Mujollari1,
  • Robert Dagil  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5594-07161,2,
  • Anne Martin-Salazar1,
  • Htoo Zarni Oo  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0009-8514-27133,
  • Lara Duvnjak  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0005-4540-37641,2,
  • Thor G. Theander1,2,
  • Mads Daugaard2,3,
  • Tobias Gustavsson  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0243-22481,2 &
  • …
  • Ali Salanti  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2207-55751,2 

Cell Death & Disease , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 458 Accesses

  • 15 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Drug development
  • Targeted therapies

Abstract

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) offer a targeted cancer treatment approach by delivering cytotoxic payloads directly to tumor cells. However, resistance mechanisms, poor tumor penetration, and off-target toxicity often limit clinical efficacy. Vartumab targets oncofetal chondroitin sulfate (ofCS), a pan-cancer target present on tumor cells and in the malignant stroma, with low expression in normal tissues. As part of transitioning Vartumab to clinical evaluation, two linker-payloads known to mediate bystander effects, valine-citrulline (vc)—monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) and glycine-glycine-phenylalanine-glycine (ggfg)—Deruxtecan (DXd), were investigated for design of Vartumab ADCs. We show that the ADCs maintain specificity to ofCS proteoglycans, cancer cells, and tissue biopsies, exhibiting specific binding to a wide range of malignant and metastatic tissues. Biodistribution assessment of Vartumab ADCs in mice shows strong and specific tumor uptake, with minimal accumulation in other organs. Both ADCs induced bystander killing of antigen-negative cells in the presence of antigen-positive cells and displayed potent anti-tumor activities in a cell-derived xenograft melanoma model. Furthermore, we show that Vartumab conjugates with bystander-capable linker-payloads exhibit greater in vivo potency compared to those with payloads lacking significant bystander effect. Finally, toxicity assessment in rats indicates that the ADC-MMAE is well-tolerated upon repeated doses, with similar dose-limiting toxicities as reported for clinically approved MMAE-conjugated ADCs. Our data support further clinical development of Vartumab-based ADCs.

Similar content being viewed by others

Optimizing the safety of antibody–drug conjugates for patients with solid tumours

Article 09 June 2023

Unlocking the potential of antibody–drug conjugates for cancer therapy

Article 08 February 2021

Exploring the next generation of antibody–drug conjugates

Article 08 January 2024

Data availability

All data relating to the findings in the article are contained in the manuscript and supporting information.

References

  1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229–63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. García-Fernández C, Saz A, Fornaguera C, Borrós S. Cancer immunotherapies revisited: state of the art of conventional treatments and next-generation nanomedicines. Cancer Gene Ther. 2021;28:935–46.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou W, Xu Z, Liu S, Lou X, Liu P, Xie H, et al. Landscape of clinical drug development of ADCs used for the pharmacotherapy of cancers: an overview of clinical trial registry data from 2002 to 2022. BMC Cancer. 2024;24:898.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen TD, Bordeau BM, Balthasar JP. Mechanisms of ADC toxicity and strategies to increase ADC tolerability. Cancers. Cancers. 2023;15:713

    Google Scholar 

  5. Khoury R, Saleh K, Khalife N, Saleh M, Chahine C, Ibrahim R. et al. Mechanisms of resistance to antibody-drug conjugates. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:1278

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fuso Nerini I, Morosi L, Zucchetti M, Ballerini A, Giavazzi R, D’Incalci M. Intratumor heterogeneity and its impact on drug distribution and sensitivity. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;96:224–38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heist RS, Sands J, Bardia A, Shimizu T, Lisberg A, Krop I, et al. Clinical management, monitoring, and prophylaxis of adverse events of special interest associated with datopotamab deruxtecan. Cancer Treat Rev. 2024;125:102720.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stepan LP, Trueblood ES, Hale K, Babcook J, Borges L, Sutherland CL. Expression of Trop2 cell surface glycoprotein in normal and tumor tissues: potential implications as a cancer therapeutic target. J Histochem Cytochem. 2011;59:701–10.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bardia A, Mayer IA, Vahdat LT, Tolaney SM, Isakoff SJ, Diamond JR, et al. Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy in Refractory Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:741–51.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baston-Bust DM, Gotte M, Janni W, Krussel JS, Hess AP. Syndecan-1 knock-down in decidualized human endometrial stromal cells leads to significant changes in cytokine and angiogenic factor expression patterns. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:133.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumura Y. Cancer stromal targeting (CAST) therapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64:710–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Modi S, Saura C, Yamashita T, Park YH, Kim S-B, Tamura K, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:610–21.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ogitani Y, Hagihara K, Oitate M, Naito H, Agatsuma T. Bystander killing effect of DS-8201a, a novel anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 antibody-drug conjugate, in tumors with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 heterogeneity. Cancer Sci. 2016;107:1039–46.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giugliano F, Corti C, Tarantino P, Michelini F, Curigliano G. Bystander effect of antibody-drug conjugates: fact or fiction? Curr Oncol Rep. 2022;24:809–17.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Z, Li H, Gou L, Li W, Wang Y. Antibody-drug conjugates: Recent advances in payloads. Acta Pharmaceutica Sin B. 2023;13:4025–59.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xu M, Zhang T, Xia R, Wei Y, Wei X. Targeting the tumor stroma for cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. 2022;21:208.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yasunaga M, Manabe S, Tarin D, Matsumura Y. Tailored immunoconjugate therapy depending on a quantity of tumor stroma. Cancer Sci. 2013;104:231–7.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cortes J, Kim SB, Chung WP, Im SA, Park YH, Hegg R, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1143–54.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsao LC, Wang JS, Ma X, Sodhi S, Ragusa JV, Liu B, et al. Effective extracellular payload release and immunomodulatory interactions govern the therapeutic effect of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). Nat Commun. 2025;16:3167.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salanti A, Clausen TM, Agerbæk MO, Al Nakouzi N, Dahlbäck M, Oo HZ. et al. Targeting human cancer by a glycosaminoglycan-binding malaria protein. Cancer Cell. 2015;28:500–14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dancey J, Eisenhauer EA. Current perspectives on camptothecins in cancer treatment. Br J Cancer. 1996;74:327–38.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Diamantis N, Banerji U. Antibody-drug conjugated-an emerging class of cancer treatment. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:362–7.

  23. Theocharis AD, Tsara ME, Papageorgacopoulou N, Karavias DD, Theocharis DA. Pancreatic carcinoma is characterized by elevated content of hyaluronan and chondroitin sulfate with altered disaccharide composition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1502:201–6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kalathas D, Theocharis DA, Bounias D, Kyriakopoulou D, Papageorgakopoulou N, Stavropoulos MS, et al. Chondroitin synthases I, II, III and chondroitin sulfate glucuronyltransferase expression in colorectal cancer. Mol Med Rep. 2011;4:363–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xu G, Guimond MJ, Chakraborty C, Lala PK. Control of proliferation, migration, and invasiveness of human extravillous trophoblast by decorin, a decidual product. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:681–9.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Salanti A, Dahlb„ck M, Turner L, Nielsen MA, Barfod L, Magistrado P. Evidence for the involvement of VAR2CSA in pregnancy-associated malaria. J Exp Med. 2004;200:1197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Agerbaek MO, Bang-Christensen SR, Yang MH, Clausen TM, Pereira MA, Sharma S, et al. The VAR2CSA malaria protein efficiently retrieves circulating tumor cells in an EpCAM-independent manner. Nat Commun. 2018;9:3279.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Spliid CB, Toledo AG, Sanderson P, Mao Y, Gatto F, Gustavsson T. et al. The specificity of the malarial VAR2CSA protein for chondroitin sulfate depends on 4-O-sulfation and ligand accessibility. J Biol Chem. 2021;297:101391

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vidal-Calvo EE, Martin-Salazar A, Choudhary S, Dagil R, Raghavan SSR, Duvnjak L, et al. Tumor-agnostic cancer therapy using antibodies targeting oncofetal chondroitin sulfate. Nat Commun. 2024;15:7553.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bax DA, Little SE, Gaspar N, Perryman L, Marshall L, Viana-Pereira M, et al. Molecular and phenotypic characterisation of paediatric glioma cell lines as models for preclinical drug development. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5209.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yao B, Gao X, Dan M, Yuan C, Hu X, Sun Z, et al. Selection of payloads for antibody-drug conjugates targeting ubiquitously expressed tumor-associated antigens: a case study. AAPS J. 2022;24:70.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nakada T, Sugihara K, Jikoh T, Abe Y, Agatsuma T. The latest research and development into the antibody-drug conjugate, [fam-] trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a), for HER2 cancer therapy. Chem Pharm Bull. 2019;67:173–85.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Caculitan NG, Dela Cruz Chuh J, Ma Y, Zhang D, Kozak KR, Liu Y, et al. Cathepsin B is dispensable for cellular processing of cathepsin B-cleavable antibody-drug conjugates. Cancer Res. 2017;77:7027–37.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Li Z, Zhang J, Wu Y, Wang F, Cai T. Integrated strategy for biotransformation of antibody-drug conjugates and multidimensional interpretation via high-resolution mass spectrometry. Drug Metab Dispos. 2025;53:100081.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Balamkundu S, Liu CF. Lysosomal-cleavable peptide linkers in antibody-drug conjugates. Biomedicines. 2023;11:3080

    Google Scholar 

  36. Szijj PA, Bahou C, Chudasama V. Minireview: addressing the retro-Michael instability of maleimide bioconjugates. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2018;30:27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Buecheler JW, Winzer M, Tonillo J, Weber C, Gieseler H. Impact of payload hydrophobicity on the stability of antibody-drug conjugates. Mol Pharm. 2018;15:2656–64.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yerroum M, Braconnier F, Chariot P. Influence of handling procedures on rat plasma creatine kinase activity. Muscle Nerve. 1999;22:1119–21.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Nadkarni DV, Lee J, Jiang Q, Patel V, Sriskanda V, Dutta K, et al. Impact of drug conjugation and loading on target antigen binding and cytotoxicity in cysteine antibody-drug conjugates. Mol Pharm. 2021;18:889–97.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li F, Emmerton KK, Jonas M, Zhang X, Miyamoto JB, Setter JR, et al. Intracellular released payload influences potency and bystander-killing effects of antibody-drug conjugates in preclinical models. Cancer Res. 2016;76:2710–9.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Okamoto H, Oitate M, Hagihara K, Shiozawa H, Furuta Y, Ogitani Y, et al. Pharmacokinetics of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), a novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate, in HER2-positive tumour-bearing mice. Xenobiotica. 2020;50:1242–50.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bocci M, Zana A, Principi L, Lucaroni L, Prati L, Gilardoni E, et al. In vivo activation of FAP-cleavable small molecule-drug conjugates for the targeted delivery of camptothecins and tubulin poisons to the tumor microenvironment. J Control Release. 2024;367:779–90.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tsumura R, Anzai T, Koga Y, Takashima H, Matsumura Y, Yasunaga M. Anti-tissue factor antibody conjugated with monomethyl auristatin E or deruxtecan in pancreatic cancer models. Cancer Sci. 2024;115:3986–96.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang P, Tao C, Shimura T, Huang AC, Kong N, Dai Y, et al. ICAM1 antibody drug conjugates exert potent antitumor activity in papillary and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. iScience. 2023;26:107272.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zhu B, Wang X, Shimura T, Huang AC, Kong N, Dai Y, et al. Development of potent antibody drug conjugates against ICAM1(+) cancer cells in preclinical models of cholangiocarcinoma. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023;7:93.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Colombo R, Rich JR. The therapeutic window of antibody drug conjugates: a dogma in need of revision. Cancer Cell. 2022;40:1255–63.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Colombo R, Tarantino P, Rich JR, LoRusso PM, de Vries EGE. The journey of antibody-drug conjugates: lessons learned from 40 years of development. Cancer Discov. 2024;14:2089–108.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Chumpol Hueyploo, Sabrina Damiri, Julie Zeberg Salwin, Akiko Shirashi, Benjamin Jacobsen, Muhammad Tauseef Mukhtar, Raminta Jonauskaite, Yasmin Ibrahim, and Mikkel Snog Vestergård for excellent technical support. At the University of Copenhagen, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, we would like to thank the Core Facility for Flow Cytometry and Single Cell Analysis for assistance in flow cytometry experiments, the Histolab for preparing tissues blocks and slides for us, and the Core Facility for Integrated BioImaging for helping with image acquisition… We would also like to thank the Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine for access to their MALDI-TOF instrument.

Funding

EEVC is supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation (NNF) BRIDGE Translational Excellence Program grant (NNF23SA0087869). JM is supported by the NNF Project grant (NNF23OC0086106). MD is supported by the Terry Fox Research Institute New Frontier Program Project Grant (1109). ASa is supported by the NNF Tandem grant (NNF21OC0068192); NNF Distinguished Innovator grant (NNF22OC0076055).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Translational Medicine and Parasitology, Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Ann Skafte, Elena Ethel Vidal-Calvo, Swati Choudhary, Joana Mujollari, Robert Dagil, Anne Martin-Salazar, Lara Duvnjak, Thor G. Theander, Tobias Gustavsson & Ali Salanti

  2. VAR2 Pharmaceuticals ApS, Frederiksberg, Denmark

    Ann Skafte, Swati Choudhary, Robert Dagil, Lara Duvnjak, Thor G. Theander, Mads Daugaard, Tobias Gustavsson & Ali Salanti

  3. Vancouver Prostate Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institutes, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    Htoo Zarni Oo & Mads Daugaard

Authors
  1. Ann Skafte
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elena Ethel Vidal-Calvo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Swati Choudhary
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Joana Mujollari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Robert Dagil
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anne Martin-Salazar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Htoo Zarni Oo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lara Duvnjak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Thor G. Theander
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mads Daugaard
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Tobias Gustavsson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ali Salanti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

ASk, EVC, SC, RD, TG and ASa conceived and designed the study; ASk, EVC and ASa wrote the original manuscript draft; ASk and EVC prepared the main figures and supplementary figure files; HZO prepared Fig. 5g; ASk, EVC, SC, JM, RD, AMS, HZO and LD, performed the experiments; MD, TG and ASa supervised; ASk, EVC, SC, JM, RD, AMS, HZO, LD, TGT, MD, TG and ASa contributed to discussing the data, reviewing the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Salanti.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

ASa, MD, and TGT are shareholders of VAR2 Pharmaceuticals. The antibodies are subject to a patenting process owned by VAR2 Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Edited by Professor Boris Zhivotovsky

Supplementary information

Supplementary Material

Generation of Vartumab ADCs

Vartumab specificity in vitro

Vartumab binding to multi-organ human tissue microarray

Vartumab ADCs bind to multi-organ human tissue microarray

Quantification of Vartumab and ADCs’ binding to multi-organ human tissue microarray

Ponceau staining of tissue localization

Localization of Vartumab ADCs in ofCS-expressing tumor models

Bystander killing in vitro

Bystander killing in vivo and toxicology of Vartumab ADC treated rats

Overview of cancer cell lines

Data Set 1

Data Set 2

Data Set 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skafte, A., Vidal-Calvo, E.E., Choudhary, S. et al. Preclinical profiling of antibody drug conjugates targeting oncofetal chondroitin sulfate. Cell Death Dis (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-026-08420-x

Download citation

  • Received: 14 May 2025

  • Revised: 11 December 2025

  • Accepted: 21 January 2026

  • Published: 24 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-026-08420-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open access publishing
  • Contact
  • For Advertisers
  • Press Releases
  • About the Partner
  • Upcoming Conferences

Publish with us

  • For Authors & Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Cell Death & Disease (Cell Death Dis)

ISSN 2041-4889 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited