Abstract
There is currently limited data to describe managing a urethral stricture identified while attempting penile prosthesis placement. This study reports our management of urethral strictures during penile prosthesis placement and proposes a guideline for this event. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent penile prosthesis implantation and had incidentally found urethral stricture disease from 2009 to 2023. Cases that proceeded to the placement of penile implant were classified as “completed,” while cases that could not proceed were classified as “aborted.” Successful management was defined as the absence of complications requiring explantation within 90 days of the procedure. Twenty-four cases were identified. Of these twenty-four patients, eighteen had completed procedures, while six had their procedures aborted. Within 90 days after the procedure, one patient presented with urinary retention. No patients had penile prosthesis infections within 90 days. Of the six “aborted” patients, five had strictures greater than 2 cm in length with urethral lumens between 8–10F. One patient had an obliterated urethra; three patients underwent urethroplasty; one patient underwent urethral dilation and suprapubic tube placement; and two patients underwent a direct vision internal urethrotomy. This retrospective study surrounding synchronous penile prosthesis implantation and urethral stricture disease management yielded high success and low complication rates.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data regarding any of the subjects in the study has not been previously published. Available data will be made available to the editors of the journal for review or query upon request.
References
Aytae IA, McKinlay JB, Krane RJ. The likely worldwide increase in erectile dysfunction between 1995 and 2025 and some possible policy consequences. BJU Int. 1999;84:50–6.
Burnett AL, Nehra A, Breau RH, Culkin DJ, Faraday MM, Hakim LS, et al. Erectile dysfunction: AUA guideline. J Urol. 2018;200:633–41.
Darouiche RO. Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1422–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra035415
Latini JM, McAninch JW, Brandes SB, Chung JY, Rosenstein D. SIU/ICUD Consultation On Urethral Strictures: Epidemiology, etiology, anatomy, and nomenclature of urethral stenoses, strictures, and pelvic fracture urethral disruption injuries. Urology. 2014;83:S1–7.
Alwaal A, Blaschko SD, McAninch JW, Breyer BN. Epidemiology of urethral strictures. Transl Androl Urol. 2014;3:209–13. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.04.07
McGeorge S, Chung A, Desai DJ. Trends in urethral stricture management over two decades. BJU Int. 2019;124:37–41.
Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott S, Gonzalez CM, Kodama R, Peterson AC, et al. Male urethral stricture: American urological association guideline. J Urol. 2017;197:182–90.
Moynihan MJ, Voelzke B, Myers J, Breyer BN, Erickson B, Elliott SP, et al. Endoscopic treatments prior to urethroplasty: trends in management of urethral stricture disease. BMC Urol. 2020;20:68.
Agha RA, Sohrabi C, Mathew G, Franchi T, Kerwan A, O’Neill N, et al. The PROCESS 2020 guideline: updating consensus preferred reporting of CasESeries in surgery (PROCESS) guidelines. Int J Surg. 2020;84:231–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.11.005
Cui WS, Kim SD, Choi KS, Zhao C, Park JK. An unusual success with simultaneous urethral repair and reimplantation of penile prosthesis in a patient with urethral stricture induced by rotated tubing. J Sex Med. 2009;6:1783–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01218.x
Song W, Wu Y, Yuan Y, Peng J, Zhang Z, Gao B, et al. One-Stage direct-vision internal urethrotomy and penile prosthesis implantation for severe erectile dysfunction with urethral stricture. Chonnam Med J. 2009;45:33–7.
Yi YA, Fuchs JS, Davenport MT, McKibben MJ, Bergeson RL, Morey AF. Synchronous urethral repair during prosthetic surgery: safety of planned and damage control approaches using suprapubic tube urinary diversion. J Sex Med. 2019;16:1106–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.03.008
Anele UA, Le BV, Burnett AL. Suprapubic cystostomy for the management of urethral injuries during penile prosthesis implantation. Sex Med. 2014;2:178–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/sm2.44
Steenkamp JW, Heyns CF, de Kock ML. Internal urethrotomy versus dilation as treatment for male urethral strictures: a prospective, randomized comparison. J Urol. 1997;157:98–101.
Heyns CF, Steenkamp JW, De Kock ML, Whitaker P. Treatment of male urethral strictures: is repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy useful? J Urol. 1998;160:356–8.
Rozanski AT, Zhang LT, Holst DD, Copacino SA, Vanni AJ, Buckley JC. The effect of radiation therapy on the efficacy of internal urethrotomy with intralesional mitomycin C for recurrent vesicourethral anastomotic stenoses and bladder neck contractures: a multi-institutional experience. Urology. 2021;147:294–8.
Karsli O, Ustuner M, Memik O, Ulukaradag E. Comparison of urethral dilation with amplatz dilators and internal urethrotomy techniques for the treatment of urethral strictures. Urol J. 2020;17:68–72.
Habous M. Malleable (Semi-Rigid) penile prosthesis (MPP). J Sex Med. 2015;12:1984–8.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the reviewers of this paper for providing helpful feedback.
Funding
This study was approved by the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board (IRB00205900).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
APM: Data Curation, Investigation, Visualization, manuscript writing and editing. WDC: Conceptualization, Data Curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, manuscript writing and editing. MA: Manuscript writing and editing. HSN: Data Curation, manuscript writing. CA: Data Curation, Investigation, Visualization, manuscript writing and editing. ALB: Project development, manuscript editing, supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics declaration
Ethics approval was not required for this study. No work was done on any live vertebrates regarding this study. As a retrospective chart review, informed consent was not required. No images from human research participants were obtained for this study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Maremanda, A.P., Du Comb, W., Alshak, M. et al. Synchronous management of urethral stricture disease and penile prosthesis implantation: a case series. Int J Impot Res 37, 926–931 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01049-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01049-y


