Introduction

The insulator-to-metal transition (IMT) in Mott materials is a key mechanism for the development of next generation Mottronic devices1,2. The intrinsic correlated nature of the Mott insulating state makes these systems fragile to external stimuli3,4, such as the application of an electric field, which can drive the collapse of the electronic band structure and the sudden release of a large number of free carriers5,6. At the macroscopic level, this phenomenon manifests in the resistive switching process, i.e., a sharp increase of the current flow when the applied voltage exceeds a threshold value7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. This strong non-linearity triggered many efforts to develop neuromorphic building blocks for the hardware implementation of neural networks17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24 or for ultrafast volatile and non-volatile memories or processors25,26,27. The state-of-the-art macroscopic models28 are based on resistor networks that consider interconnected nodes transforming from the insulating to metallic state in the presence of an electric field. Above a certain threshold, a percolative, avalanche transition takes place, thus leading to the formation of conductive filaments and the consequent sudden drop in resistivity10,29.

The full control and exploitation of this process is currently prevented by a limited knowledge of the early-stage firing dynamics. Microscopically, little is known about the nature of the nanoscale regions that trigger the avalanche process. Also the relation between the electronic and structural properties of the switched regions and those of the pristine insulating template is a matter of debate. Pioneering optical microscopy experiments captured the real-time formation of macroscopic metallic channels30,31,32,33,34, but lacked the resolution and sensitivity to address the microscopic origin of the switching process.

Here, we adopt resonant X-ray microscopy to record nanoscale snapshots of the switching dynamics in a V2O3-based nanodevice during the application of an electric field. The results unveil the fundamental role played by the order parameter topology of the underlying lattice nanotexture. The breaking of the C3 symmetry upon transition to the insulating monoclinic phase leads to the formation of three twin shear-strain domains with boundaries oriented along the three hexagonal directions35,36. The geometrical constraints then produce shear-strain topological defects at the corners of monoclinic domains crossing with an angle of 60. These nanoscale topological defects act as seeds for the formation of the metallic phase, thus triggering the macroscopic volatile resistive switching.

V2O3 is a prototypical Mott insulator that undergoes a thermally-driven transition from a high-temperature paramagnetic, rhombohedral metal to a low-temperature antiferromagnetic monoclinic insulator37,38,39. The lattice transformation at the critical temperature TIMT implies the breaking of the C3 symmetry of the non-primitive hexagonal unit cell of the high-temperature metallic phase (see Fig. 1a). The structural transition can thus be described36 by a vector order parameter:

$${{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}=({\epsilon }_{31},{\epsilon }_{23})=\epsilon \,\left(\cos {\phi }_{n},\sin {\phi }_{n}\right)$$
(1)

associated to the shear strain components ϵ31 and ϵ23 that characterize the monoclinic distortion. Below TIMT, the amplitude of the order parameter, ϵ, becomes non-zero, while the phase can assume three different values:

$${\phi }_{n}=(2n-1)\frac{\pi }{3}$$
(2)

corresponding to the distortion along the three equivalent hexagonal axes of the rhombohedral phase, indicated in the following by the versors \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{n}\), n=1,2,3 (see Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1: Nanotexture of monoclinic V2O3.
figure 1

a Non-primitive hexagonal unit cell of the V2O3 high-temperature rhombohedral metallic phase. b Schematic of the rhombohedral-to-monoclinic distortion along each of the three equivalent hexagonal axes. c PEEM experimental setup. X-ray radiation, with tunable energy resonant with the vanadium L2,3 edge, impinges on the sample surface and the emitted electrons are collected and imaged through electrostatic and magnetic lenses. The V2O3 film is coated with gold metal electrodes, allowing to drive a current through the device (see sketch of a typical resistive switching current-voltage curve in the bottom panel) while simultaneously acquiring XLD-PEEM images.

Resistive switching can be induced by applying an electric field across a patterned micro-gap at temperatures close to TIMT30,32,40. The resistive switching device investigated here is formed by a 20 nm V2O3 film coated with gold electrodes. V2O3 is grown by oxygen-assisted Molecular Beam Epitaxy on a (0001)-Al2O3 substrate with a 40 nm Cr2O3 buffer layer to reduce any interfacial residual strain41. The resulting V2O3 film has the c-axis oriented parallel to the surface normal, with TIMT = 145 K (see Supplementary Fig. 1). Two gold electrodes allow the application of an electric bias across the gap of width w = 2 μm and length l = 30 μm (Fig. 1c). The gap region between the electrodes is imaged using PhotoEmission Electron Microscopy (PEEM), combined with X-ray Linear Dichroism (XLD) at the L2,3 vanadium edge (513-530 eV, see Supplementary Fig. 2)35,36,42. The XLD-PEEM images are obtained from the normalized difference between images recorded with the light electric field vector, E, perpendicular and 16 to the surface normal at a photon energy 520.6 eV. Since the XLD signal depends on the angle between the in-plane component of E and the position dependent order parameter, ϵ(r)36 (see Fig. 1b and c), this technique provides a map - with  ~ 30 nm spatial resolution - of the three different monoclinic domains during the resistive switching process.

Results and discussion

Figure 2a shows an XLD-PEEM image obtained in the monoclinic insulating phase at T = 120 K. The V2O3 nanotexture exhibits features typical of the monoclinic insulating phase35,36. Monoclinic domains with different ϕn give rise to different XLD contrast, which can be identified as different color intensities within the XLD-PEEM image. The minimization of the total strain leads to the formation of stripe-like domains, with symmetry-constrained directions36. Each monoclinic insulating domain extends over a few micrometers, thus connecting the two electrodes, and it is characterized by a width wdom ~ 200 nm36.

Fig. 2: PEEM imaging of resistive switching.
figure 2

XLD-PEEM images before (a) and during (bj) the application of an electric current at T = 120 K. The homogeneous regions at the top and bottom of each image are the gold electrodes. The area in between is the exposed V2O3 antiferromagnetic monoclinic phase, exhibiting a striped domain nanotexture. For currents larger than 1.5 mA, the striped domains disappear in the region delimited by the white dashed lines, demonstrating the appearance of a rhombohedral metallic filament, which widens as the current is increased.

The XLD-PEEM imaging is then repeated while driving a current, I, through the device and measuring the voltage drop, V, across the gold contacts. Figures 2b–j show the XLD-PEEM images acquired at increasing values of I, following the upward branch of the hysteresis cycle. The presence of an in-plane electric field across the electrodes introduces a weak image blurring that becomes significant for V≥ 6-8 V. Despite this, the nanodomains are well resolved during the resistive switching process, which first manifests itself at the voltage drop observed between 0.8 mA and 1.1 mA (Fig. 2c and d, respectively). As the current is further increased, the melting of the monoclinic nanotexture in the region delimited by white dashed lines (Fig. 2e–j) progresses with a widening channel with a homogenous intensity. The XLD contrast measured in the region between the white dashed lines corresponds to the signal of the high-temperature rhombohedral phase. This is also confirmed from the angle dependence of the XLD signal36. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 3, images collected with two different X-rays polarization angles, with respect to the in-plane V2O3 axes, show no intensity variation upon sample rotation in the metallic channel, as opposed to the lateral monoclinic domains, for which the XLD signal depends on the angle between the light polarization and ϵ(r). The constant XLD contrast region in the middle of the gap therefore appears due to the formation of a metallic channel with rhombohedral lattice structure (ϵ=0). XLD-PEEM images obtained under the same conditions, but with a larger field of view, capture the whole gap of the device (see Supplementary Fig. 4, which reports an independent set of PEEM measurements performed after thermal cycling to 250 K). The metallic channel consistently forms in the same location within the gap with no additional metallic paths observed. Furthermore, when the applied current is removed, the metallic channel disappears and the monoclinic domains reappear with the same pre-switching configuration, indicating a volatile process.

The formation of the metallic channel is pinned by a specific topology of the lattice nanotexture, characterized by V-shaped domains, i.e. at the crossing point of domains with the same ϕn with directions that differ by π/3. Figure 3a shows a detail of the switching region, using a colorscale that highlights the three different domains with a monoclinic distortion along \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{1}\) (red, ϕ1=π/3), \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{2}\) (blue, ϕ2=π) and \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{3}\) (yellow, ϕ3=5π/3). The stabilization of the monoclinic nanotexture is driven by the Saint-Venant compatibility condition36, which ensures a continuity of the medium during a deformation via the curl-free condition:

$$\nabla \times {{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}({{{\bf{r}}}})=0.$$
(3)

The conservation of the parallel component of ϵ(r) across an interface between two different domains has two important implications:

  1. i.

    the interface between two different monoclinic domains is oriented along \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{n}\) of the third domain;

  2. ii.

    the interface between a monoclinic and a rhombohedral metallic domain is oriented perpendicularly to \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{n}\) of the monoclinic domain.

Fig. 3: Topological defect.
figure 3

a Detail of the XLD-PEEM image shown in Fig. 2a in the region where the metallic filament is formed upon the application of a current above the threshold Ith. b Schematic of the monoclinic domains crossing at 60 and forming a topological defect. Blue, red and yellow areas identify the three possible monoclinic domains corresponding to the three equivalent order parameter directions \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{n}\). The order parameter at the boundaries between different domains is oriented along \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{1}+{\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{2}\) (2π/3) for the red-blue interface and along \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{2}+{\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{3}\) (4π/3) for the blue-yellow interface. The mixed red-yellow triangular region indicates the local suppression of the strain at the topological defect. The energy functionals shown on the left and right, illustrate how a topological defect (green plot, solid line) decreases the insulator-metal energy difference, Δ.

If we consider, for example, a domain with order parameter along \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{2}\) (blue in Fig. 3b), its interface is oriented along \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{1}\), i.e. at π/3 angle, when it neighbours an \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{3}\) domain (yellow), whereas it is oriented along \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{3}\), i.e. at 2π/3 angle, when it neighbours an \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{1}\) domain (red), in agreement with the nanotexture reported in Fig. 3. The Saint-Venant condition corresponds to a fixed phase jump δϕ=2π/3 of ϵ(r) across any interface between two monoclinic domains. We note that this condition is satisfied throughout the nanotextured domain structure, except at the V-shaped vertex structure formed by two \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{2}\) domains with boundaries oriented along \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{1}\) and \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{3}\). If we consider a circuit Γ1 across the boundary between two striped domains, the total phase shift is given by δϕ=+2π/3-2π/3=0 thus adhering to the curl-free condition in Eq. (3). In contrast, the topology of the V-shaped structure is such that, if we move around the internal apex (Γ2), the total phase-shift is constrained to δϕ=+2π/3+2π/3=4π/3, thus breaking the curl-free condition. The consequence is that the vertex of the V-shaped domains acts as a topological defect with a fractional Hopf index (see Supplementary Note 6). These topological defects are inherently characterized by the strong frustration of the local value of the order parameter ϵ(r) and fluctuations on spatial and temporal scales that cannot be captured by the present experiment. We further note that the formation of the topological defect is a direct and unavoidable consequence of the quasi-1D confined geometry of the system. Whereas the component of the order parameter parallel to the electrodes (ϵ, see Fig. 3b) can be compensated outside the gap, the perpendicular component (ϵ) has to be minimized to avoid the accumulation of excessive strain energy within the gap region. Thus, considering the directions of ϵ(r) at the boundaries between different monoclinic domains (see Fig. 3b), the formation of V-shaped domains is a unique configuration that fulfils the requirement ϵ=0.

The suppression of the symmetry-breaking order parameter, ϵ(r), at topological defects has far-reaching implications related to the nature of the resistive switching process. The electronic IMT can be described by a scalar order parameter η(r)36, which depends on the position r and is such that η = − 1 in the metallic state and η = + 1 in the insulating state. The coupling between the electronic and structural transitions can be described by the energy functional36:

$$F \, \left[\epsilon,\eta \right]\propto \int\,d{{{\bf{r}}}}\,\left\{{\left({\eta }^{2}({{{\bf{r}}}})-1\right)}^{2}-g\left({\epsilon }^{2}({{{\bf{r}}}})-{\epsilon }_{t}^{2}(V)\right)\,\eta ({{{\bf{r}}}})\right\}\,,$$
(4)

where g is the coupling between the electronic order parameter and the strain and ϵt(V) is a threshold parameter that controls the first-order IMT and can depend on the applied voltage V. When \({\epsilon }^{2}({{{\bf{r}}}}) \, > \, {\epsilon }_{t}^{2}(V)\), the insulating phase with η = + 1 is locally favoured, whereas for strain smaller than the threshold value, i.e. \({\epsilon }^{2}({{{\bf{r}}}}) < {\epsilon }_{t}^{2}(V)\), the metallic solution is stabilized. \({\epsilon }_{t}^{2}(V)\) thus represents the threshold above which the insulating monoclinic state (η = + 1, ϵ ≠ 0) becomes stable. The description of the electric-field induced transition is based on the observation5 that the electric field directly couples to the electronic bandstructure of a Mott insulator, making the metallic phase more stable. The transition can thus be described assuming that \({\epsilon }_{t}^{2}(V)\) increases with increasing V. The energy difference between the insulating and metallic phase can be expressed as \(\Delta ({{{\bf{r}}}},V)=F[-1]-F[+1]\simeq g\left[{\epsilon }^{2}({{{\bf{r}}}})-{\epsilon }_{t}^{2}(V)\right]\). If we start from the insulating phase with \({\epsilon }^{2}({{{\bf{r}}}})\, > \, {\epsilon }_{t}^{2}(V=0)\), the IMT takes place when V is increased up to the point that Δ(rV)=0. A topological defect, which locally suppresses ϵ2(r), thus acts as a seed with a lower threshold compared to the rest of the system.

Intriguingly, we also note from Eq. (4) that the IMT can take place at a non-zero value of ϵ2(r), which allows the formation of a non-thermal metallic state (η = − 1) with a finite monoclinic distortion (\({\epsilon }^{2}({{{\bf{r}}}}) \, \lesssim \, {\epsilon }_{t}^{2}(V)\)), as already observed in non-equilibrium optical experiments36,43. The nature of the early-stage switching process can be inferred by a direct comparison between the electrical state of the device and the melting of the monoclinic domains. The I − V curve of the device, as measured in-situ during the PEEM imaging, is plotted in Fig. 4a. XLD-PEEM images were recorded at specific values of I. The I − V plot shows that the first resistive switching event occurs at the threshold current Ith = 1.05 mA. In Fig. 4b, we report a linecut of the XLD-PEEM image acquired at specific values of I; the image profile is taken along a line crossing the monoclinic domains in the middle of the device gap (see white solid line in Fig. 4, top panel). For large currents running through the device, the line profile in Fig. 4b displays a flat region, which indicates the melting of the monoclinic nanodomains due to the formation of the rhombohedral metallic channel. As highlighted by the grey area in Fig. 4b, the width d of the metallic filament increases with the current, from d = 0.23 ± 0.05 μm at I = 1.5 mA to d = 3.7 ± 0.2 μm at I = 10 mA.

Fig. 4: Metallic channel formation.
figure 4

a IV curve measured during the XLD-PEEM imaging. The sudden drop in the voltage measured at Ith=1.05 mA indicates the first resistive switch. b Line profiles of the XLD-PEEM images in Fig. 2. The grey shaded area indicates the progressive widening of the metallic rhombohedral filament. The direction of the line profiles is shown by the white dashed line in the XLD-PEEM image on top, where we report a detail of Fig. 2j. c Width, d, of the metallic filament as a function of current. The blue/red markers represent the values of d obtained from the XLD-PEEM images below/above Ith. The errorbars indicate the uncertainty in the filament width, estimated from the line profiles in panel b; when no filament is observed (first four data points, d = 0), the errorbar is fixed to the experimental spatial resolution. The green solid line shows an estimate of d, derived from a parallel resistors model predicting a sudden jump of d to 200 μm at Ith (see Supplementary Note 5).

Modelling the device as a circuit with two parallel resistors (see Supplementary Note 5) allows an estimation of d of the rhombohedral filament corresponding to the observed voltage drop. For large currents running through the device, the experimentally determined values of d match well with those predicted for a metallic channel forming in the gap, which has the resistivity of the high-temperature rhombohedral phase, as shown in Fig. 4c, and in Supplementary Fig. 5a for the full current range. However, in correspondence of the first resistive switching event at Ith=1.05 mA, the model predicts the sudden formation of a  ~ 200 nm wide metallic rhombohedral filament, which is not visible in the XLD-PEEM images (see Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 5), despite being well above the experimental resolution of the microscope. This is evidenced by PEEM imaging at I=1.1 mA, where no variation in the domain nanotexture is appreciated, while the simultaneous voltage measurement guarantees that the device has already switched. To explain this discrepancy, one might suspect that a rhombohedral metallic filament forms below the surface of the V2O3 film, where it is not detected by PEEM which has a surface sensitivity limited to the first few nanometers. In fact, two arguments act against this possibility. i) The presence of the Cr2O3 buffer layer reduces the substrate-film lattice mismatch from 4.2% to 0.1%, thus almost entirely removing the residual epitaxial strain in the film41, which is known to suppress the monoclinic phase and favour interfacial metallicity41,44. In contrast to highly-strained films, in which the metal to insulator resistivity jump is strongly suppressed44, the films in the present study display the 5-order of magnitude resistivity change typical of the unstrained metal-to-insulator transition (see Supplementary Fig. 1). ii) The curl-free conditions force the interface between monoclinic and rhombohedral metallic regions to be oriented perpendicularly to the order parameter of the monoclinic domain. The formation of a sub-surface metallic layer would lead to a sharp ( 20 nm) monoclinic-rhombohedral interface parallel to ϵ, thus leading to a dramatic increase of the strain energy of the system. Our results are compatible with a complex scenario in which the topology-driven resistive switching likely occurs via the sudden transformation of a single 200 nm wide insulating monoclinic area into a metallic channel with a non-thermal monoclinic lattice structure. At a second stage, the Joule heating leads to a local temperature increase and, consequently, to the thermally driven monoclinic-to-rhombohedral structural transition and the formation of a rhombohedral metallic channel perpendicular to both the metallic electrodes and the \({\hat{{{{\boldsymbol{\epsilon }}}}}}_{2}\) order parameter direction, as observed in Fig. 2.

The X-ray-based nanoimaging of a Mott device under operating conditions allowed us to simultaneously capture the formation of nanoscale conductive paths and the topology of the underlying symmetry-broken nanotexture. The present results expand our knowledge of the resistive switching process in Mott materials by demonstrating the leading role of inherent topological defects in initiating the avalanche process. The methodologies used in this work imply that nanoscale strain engineering approaches could unlock a gate to manipulating topological defects and controlling the electronic switching dynamics in real devices, such as Mott-transition-based RRAM45,46, Mott memristor47,48,49 and artificial neurons50,51. Fine tuning of crystal growth by adjustment of the substrate parameters52,53, manipulation of the geometry and orientation of metallic over-layers and use of nano-patterning approaches54 represent possible viable routes to introduce topological defects in a controlled way via strain manipulation. The concept of topology-driven resistive switching will be key to assessing the possible non-thermal nature of the early stage electronic phase36 as well as the microscopic origin of memory and non-volatile effects recently observed in Mott devices11. We note that the relation between topological defects and electronic phase transitions established here is a general concept, potentially extendable to other systems that undergo first-order phase transitions accompanied by a symmetry breaking, as described by the energy functional (4). Relevant examples embrace transition-metal oxides1,55, such as vanadates, nickelates and manganites, and layered materials, such as 1T-TaS256,57,58,59, in which the IMT is accompanied by charge-, lattice- and orbital-ordered states with reduced symmetry. Further platforms include cuprate superconductors60 and kagome metals61 in which light- or magnetic-induced discontinuous electronic transitions coexist with charge-order. Topological defects in the order parameter therefore provide a framework for understanding non-equilibrium electronic phase transitions, allowing all-optical control of hidden states of matter in a broad class of quantum materials59,62,63,64,65,66.

Methods

Samples

The V2O3 sample is grown by oxygen-assisted molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) in a vacuum chamber with a base pressure of 10−9 Torr and a growth temperature of 700C. In order to relax the tensile strain in the V2O3 film, a Cr2O3 buffer layer is first grown on a (0001)-Al2O3 substrate, used without prior cleaning. V is evaporated from an electron gun with a flux of 0.1 Å/s, and an oxygen partial pressure of 6.2 × 10−6 Torr is used during the growth41. Under these conditions, a single crystalline epitaxial film with the c-axis oriented perpendicular to the surface is obtained. Temperature-dependent resistivity measurements (Supplementary Fig. 1) are performed in the Van der Pauw configuration using an Oxford Optistat CF2-V cryostat with a sweep rate of 1.0 K per minute.

Device fabrication

The V2O3 thin film is patterned using standard optical lithography using AZ1505 resist. After developing the exposed areas, we deposit 5 nm of Ti + 60 nm of Au in an electron beam evaporator with a base pressure in the range of 10−9 mbar. Finally, the sample is lifted off in acetone and cleaned with IPA and N2 gas.

Experimental setup

PEEM measurements have been performed at the I06 beamline at the Diamond Light Source synchrotron. The X-rays beam is tuned to 520.6 eV photon energy; two different linear polarizations, perpendicular and at 16 to the sample surface normal, are employed to image the photoemitted electrons. XLD-PEEM images are obtained from the average of the difference between 30 PEEM images acquired with the two polarizations, normalized to their sum35,36. Resistive switching is performed by driving a current through the V2O3 device by means of a Keithley 2461 SourceMeter, which sources current I and measures voltage V across two gold electrodes. The current is swiped to a specific value I*, which is then maintained constant while XLD-PEEM images are acquired.