Introduction

Recently, the pentafluorosulfanyl (SF5) group1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, an emerging organic fluorinated functional group, has attracted significant attention in the fields of medicine, pesticides and materials9,10,11,12,13,14,15. Compared with its structurally analogous CF3 group, SF5 group has higher lipophilicity (similar to t-Bu group) and electron-absorbing properties (similar to nitro group)16,17. Therefore, the installation of an SF5 group to an organic molecule significantly affects its physical and chemical properties. Consequently, molecules bearing an SF5 functional group could potentially be excellent pharmaceutical compounds1,4,18. Despite the similarity between SF5 and CF3, there are still a limited number of reactions to introduce SF5 group, in contrast to the well-established chemistry of CF3. For aromatic or heteroaromatic SF5 compounds, the methods include the direct fluorination of aryl disulfides in the presence of an alkali metal fluoride, as well as the chlorine to fluorine exchange of pre-synthesized chlorotetrafluorosulfanyl intermediates using a fluoride source such as AgF, IF5, HgO/HF or PPHF, KHF2, Ag2CO3, AgBF4 etc19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29. In the case of aliphatic SF5 compounds, the predominant strategy involves the addition of SF5Cl or SF5Br to alkenes and alkynes under mild free radical conditions30,31,32,33. However, the synthesis and storage of SF5Cl reagents have long been challenging due to their high reactivity and low boiling point; it wasn’t until 2019 that Togni and Pitts et al. discovered a gas-free method for synthesizing SF5Cl using molecular sulfur, trichloroisocyanuric acid (TCICA), and potassium fluoride (KF)34. Based upon it, the Qing group in 2021 developed a more practical approach to produce an easy-to-handle solution of SF5Cl in n-hexane35. Accordingly, SF5Cl has been emerging as a popular SF5 donor in a variety of radical pentafluorosulfanylation reactions36,37,38,39,40. For instance, Qing’s group reports hydro(chloro)pentafluoro-sulfanylation of diazo compounds35, iodopentafluorosulfanylation of [1.1.1]propellane as well as three-component radical addition reaction of SF5Cl41, alkene and diazo compounds42. Shortly thereafter, they developed a one-step method to synthesize SF5-substituted alkynes from ethynylbenziodoxolones (EBX)43. Pitts et al. synthesized structurally diversified SF5-bicyclopentanes (SF5-BCPs) and SF5-cyclobutanes (SF5-CBs) via a strain-release pentafluorosulfanylated process36,38. Champagne and Paquin et al. discover photoinitiated anti-hydropentafluorosulfanylation of terminal alkynes44. Cahard and co-workers utilized a combination of SF5Cl, KI, and 18-crown-6 ether to produce SF5I and successfully synthesized (E)−1-iodo-2-(pentafluoro-λ6-sulfanyl) alkenes45. Moreover, the direct activation of the highly inert sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) as a pentafluorosulfanylating reagent offers an alternative source of SF5• for photoredox catalysis46,47,48. However, to date, this method has been limited to reactions with styrene derivatives. Concurrently, the synthetic applications and derivatizations of SF5-substituted building blocks facilitate the efficient construction of complex SF5-containing molecules that are otherwise challenging to synthesize49,50,51. Despite these advancements, the formation of Cl radicals during the radical chemistry of SF5Cl with alkenes often leads to the production of chlorinated SF5-products, limiting the development of SF5Cl as a reagent33,42,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61. Therefore, developing a more practical and efficient method for synthesizing novel SF5-substituted compounds is highly desirable.

Alkenes are key building blocks in organic chemistry. The radical bifunctionalization of alkenes is an efficient and practical synthetic protocol, enabling the simultaneous introduction of two pivotal functional groups. Fluorinated alkyl radicals, renowned for their robust electrophilic nature, readily engage in radical addition reactions with alkenes. Additionally, the hydroxyl functional group, as a valuable synthetic building block, could be introduced by oxygen gas and enable further diverse functionalizations62,63. To date, such a strategy has been widely utilized in various fluorinated functional groups, including CF364,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75, CnF2n+176,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84, CF2H85,86,87,88, F89,90,91,92 and SCF393 (Fig. 1a). However, the single-step method for the simultaneous introduction of SF5 and hydroxyl groups to alkenes has only been reported by the Wagenknecht group47. More commonly, the currently existing methods to synthesize pentafluorosulfanyl alcohols utilize indirect methods via multi-step reactions94, or direct methods but using alcohol-containing starting materials52,59. Nevertheless, current reactions generally lack broad substrate scopes, with only a few reports of pentafluorosulfanyl alcohols. We hypothesize that a direct method where two functional groups could be introduced would have great potential in late-stage drug development, especially in complex and bioactive complex molecules. However, recent synthetic progress has significant limitations. For instance, in an oxidizing environment, alcohols are prone to further oxidation, forming their ketone derivatives66,68. Moreover, other radical additions, such as the chlorohydroxylation95,96 and chloropentafluorosulfanylation33,42,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61 of olefins, can occur, leading to uncontrollable and undesired products (Fig. 1b). Herein, through our meticulous design, we present the photo-induced hydroxypentafluorosulfanylation of alkenes using SF5Cl and oxygen gas as the oxidant. Importantly, we demonstrate that these SF5-alcohol scaffolds not only serve as suitable platforms for synthesizing α-SF5-ketones, SF5-diols, SF5-cyclic carbonates, but also hold promise for the development of potential SF5-substituted medicinal drugs (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1: Radical-mediated hydroxyfluoroalkylation of alkene and this work.
figure 1

a Literature statistics of the advancements in hydroxyfluoroalkylation of alkenes. b The challenge posed by radical hydroxypentafluorosulfanylation of alkenes. c Hydroxypentafluorosulfanylation of alkenes with SF5Cl and oxygen gas.

Results

Method optimization

To optimize reaction conditions, α,β-unsaturated ester 1a was chosen as the template alkene substrate to react with SF5Cl. Under optimal conditions, 0.1 M DCM was used as the solvent, and 1a (0.05 mmol) and SF5Cl (0.1 mmol) were exposed to oxygen gas in the presence of 1 equivalent of H2O and 0.2 equivalents of 1-hexene for 4 h at room temperature under 365 nm LEDs light. Product 3a was produced with an 89% isolated yield (Table 1, entry 1). We found that the addition of 1-hexene significantly increased the yield by inhibiting the formation of chlorinated byproducts (entry 2 and vide infra). Additionally, oxygen gas was critical for the transformation; no reaction was detected in its absence (entry 4). When halogenated solvents such as CHCl3 and CCl4 were used for the reaction (entries 5 and 6), diminishing yields were observed. Non-chlorinated solvents, including THF and acetonitrile, also resulted in much lower yields (entries 7 and 8). Additionally, using 427 nm or 390 nm LEDs as the excitation light source led to sluggish reactions and lower yields (entries 9 and 10). Using less than two equivalents of SF5Cl or increasing the reaction concentration resulted in reduced yields (entries 11 and 12).

Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditionsa

Substrate scope

With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we examined the functional group tolerance of olefinic substrates. We were pleased to find that a variety of electron-donating and electron-withdrawing functional groups on the aryl ring were well tolerated in this transformation (3a-3p, Fig. 2). Electron-withdrawing groups such as cyano, ester, trifluoromethoxy, trifluoromethylthio and acetyl were well tolerated, furnishing products 3b-3f in 52–81% yield. Furthermore, trifluoromethyl groups on aryl ring were tolerated under the reaction conditions with positional insignificance (3j-3l). Additionally, the transformation also tolerated electron-neutral and electron-donating groups. Products with phenyl (3g), methyl (3h), and tert-butyl (3i) groups were obtained in 60–83% yield. Substrates with halogen groups on the aromatic rings also performed well, delivering products 3n and 3o in 62% and 60% yields, respectively, which are more conducive to subsequent coupling derivatization. The nitro group (3p) with strong polarity was also well tolerated, yielding 76%. When the ester group is attached to aliphatic groups (3q-3s), the hydroxypentafluorosulfanylation of the alkene achieved yields of 44–76%. It was gratifying to observe that a tertiary alcohol featuring the SF5 motif (3t) could be generated in 77% yield, indicating the potential of our strategy to overcome steric hindrance in substrates. Further exploration revealed that both single substituted (3c) and multiple substituted (3m) substrates are suitable for this transformation, with the desired products obtained in moderate yields. To further demonstrate the synthetic applications of this protocol, we explored the late-stage elaboration of natural product derivatives and pharmaceutical molecules, achieving synthetically useful yields. For example, the amino acid derivative tyrosine methyl ester (3v) was produced in 50% yield. The corresponding product 3w was also obtained in the reaction with the natural androgen estrone. We unequivocally verified the desired hydroxypentafluorosulfanylation product 3x from an acetovanillone-based olefin via X-ray crystallographic analysis. Additionally, the androgen receptor antagonist Ru58841 (3y) participated in the reaction with a yield of 58%. Selected pharmaceutically active compounds, including carvacrol (3z), 4-tert-octylphenol (3aa), and raspberry ketone (3ab), smoothly proceeded to deliver the corresponding products, highlighting the capacity for late-stage modification of complex natural or pharmaceutical molecules. These experimental results further demonstrate the advantages of our strategy in late-stage transformations to derive biologically relevant pentafluorosulfanylated molecules. Due to the lipophilic properties of the SF5 group, these molecules could potentially have unique biological activities in medicinal development, even with the protected alcohol functional groups of bioactive compounds.

Fig. 2: Substrate scope of hydroxypentafluorosulfanylation of alkenes.
figure 2

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.05 mmol), 2 (0.1 mmol, ~0.3 M in n-hexane), H2O (0.05 mmol), O2 (0.09 mmol), 1-hexene (0.01 mmol), DCM (0.5 mL), 365 nm LEDs, r.t., 4 h, N2 atmosphere, isolated yields. aReaction was scaled up to 0.5 mmol scale; bWhite LEDs, 12 h instead of 365 nm LEDs, 4 h.

We next sought to broaden the substrate scope of the transformation to include styrenes (Fig. 3). To our delight, the target product 4a was obtained in 65% yield when styrene was used. However, when electron-donating groups were attached to the phenyl rings, almost no products were generated under standard conditions. Further investigation indicated that the formation of an electron-donor-acceptor (EDA) complex between the electron-donating group substrates and pentafluorothiochloride resulted in the consumption of the substrate, as evidenced by UV-visible spectroscopy experiments (see Supporting Information Section 2.5.1 for details). We hypothesized that an increased amount of substrate would be necessary for an effective reaction. To our delight, switching the ratio of electron-donating substrates to SF5Cl to 2:1 uneventfully furnished 4b, 4c, and 4h albeit somewhat diminished yields, showcasing the generality of the reaction. We then tested substrates with electron-withdrawing groups. In the case of using a substrate with an ester motif, the reaction occurred smoothly, with the ester remaining intact (4d). Halogen atom (F, Br) substituents on the aryl ring (4g and 4i) had little influence on the reaction efficiency. The effect of substituents at different positions was determined using trifluoromethyl substrates (4f, 4j and 4k). Even in cases with the trifluoromethyl group in the ortho position, the reaction yield was still good (4k). For substrates with multiple halogens, the corresponding products (4l and 4m) were obtained with good yields of 76% and 78%. Unfortunately, further examination of styrene derivatives revealed that based-derived structures, such as pyridine or aniline (See Supporting Information Section 2.3 for details), still remained unsuitable for this reaction.

Fig. 3: Substrate scope of hydroxypentafluorosulfanylation of styrenes.
figure 3

aCondition A: 1 (0.05 mmol), 2 (0.1 mmol, ~0.3 M in n-hexane), H2O (0.05 mmol), O2 (0.09 mmol), 1-hexene (0.01 mmol), DCM (0.5 mL), 365 nm LEDs, r.t., 4 h, N2 atmosphere, isolated yields; bCondition B: 1 (0.1 mmol), 2 (0.05 mmol), H2O (0.05 mmol), O2 (0.09 mmol), 1-hexene (0.01 mmol), DCM (0.5 mL), 365 nm LEDs, r.t., 4 h, N2 atmosphere, isolated yields.

Further derivatization

The synthetic utility of this approach has also been demonstrated by the transformations of the resulting hydroxypentafluorosulfanylated compounds. First, as described in previous literature, the SF5-substituted ketone is significant35,50,55,97. As shown in Fig. 4, oxidation of pentafluorosulfanyl alcohol 4f using PCC reagent afforded ketone 5 in 85% yield. We can also use NaBH4 to reduce 3h to give the desired diol 6 in 78% yield. The resulting diol product 6 can be further transformed. For example, when reacting with CDI and DMAP, it could be converted to SF5-substituted cyclic carbonate 10 in 92% yield. In addition, the diol product 6 could undergo selective protection of alcohols to give product 11. Gratifyingly, the resulting SF5-substituted α-hydroxy acids (AHAs), as the potential cosmetics, were obtained under the acidity condition. In addition, 3h could be transformed into 8 in the presence of acetyl chloride, which also demonstrated the utility of our method. Treatment of product 3h with aniline afforded acylation product 9 successfully in 78% yield. Moreover, cross-coupling transformations are among the most common and powerful reactions in the synthesis and development of SF5 compounds97,98,99, the bromo-substituted SF5 alcohols 4i could function as a coupling reagent to generate the desired arylation or animation products (12 and 13) through either Suzuki or Buchwald-Hartwig cross-coupling reaction, without any protecting groups on the substrates. Our strategy to develop hydroxypentafluorosulfanyl products would be synthetically valuable and powerful to expand the pharmaceutical drug pools containing the SF5 group.

Fig. 4: Further transformation of pentafluorosulfanyl alcohols.
figure 4

Reaction conditions: See the Supporting Information Section 2.6 for full experimental details, isolated yields. aYield was determined by 19F NMR spectroscopy using trifluoroacetic acid as the internal standard.

Mechanistic investigations

Control experiments were conducted to gain mechanistic insights into the reaction. Under standard conditions, the reaction was entirely suppressed by 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO), and no products were formed, suggesting the involvement of a radical process (Fig. 5a). Subsequently, in the absence of oxygen, the reaction with alkenes, whether acrylic acid ester or styrene, failed to produce the desired product 3a or 4b, instead yielding the chloropentafluorosulfanylated products 14 or 15 (Fig. 5b). Notably, when the chloropentafluorosulfanylated product 15 was directly subjected to the standard conditions, almost no hydroxypentafluorosulfanylated product 4b were obtained, with the starting material largely unreacted. Therefore, formation of chloropentafluorosulfanylated product is not the primary pathway in the overall mechanism (vide infra; Path II). To further clarify the source of hydrogen at the hydroxyl site of the product, control experiments were performed under the standard conditions while using d2-DCM as the reaction solvent and D2O as proton reagents respectively (Fig. 5c, Supporting Information Section 2.5.2). When d2-DCM were used, 3a-d could be obtained in 62% D. By contrast, when D2O was used, only 39% D was observed. This result clearly demonstrated that the proton of H2O and solvent (DCM) were transferred to the product. As shown in Fig. 5d, the unactivated olefin (4-phenyl-1-butene 16) instead of 1-hexene was used to react with two equivalents of SF5Cl, and dichlorinated addition product 17 was successfully obtained as the main product and a few hydroxypentafluorosulfanylated product 18, which demonstrated that aliphatic alkene (1-hexene) used in this experiment was a favorable chlorine radical trapping agent. However, when 4-phenyl-1-butene and an acrylic acid ester were used as substrates, a competition reaction occurred, resulting in a mixture of the corresponding hydroxypentafluorosulfanylated products (3a and 18), also along with the formation of a dichlorinated addition product of 4-phenyl-1-butene. Based on our control experiments and previous studies, we propose the following reaction mechanism (Fig. 5e). The reaction is initiated by the excitation of SF5Cl using a 365 nm UV lamp. The S-Cl bond undergoes homolytic cleavage to form a Cl radical and an SF5 radical, with the Cl radical being trapped by 1-hexene to afford 1,2-dichlorohexane. Of note, the quantum yield studies100 indicate that this is a radical-chain process as evidenced by the calculation (Φ = 11, see Supporting Information Section 2.5.3 for details). Therefore, an alternative pathway involves the trapping of SF5Cl by the C6H13 radical or CHCl2 radical, derived from the solvent (hexane or DCM), leading to the formation of the corresponding aliphatic chlorides, C6H13Cl or CHCl3. These products were confirmed by HRMS (Supporting Information Section 2.5.3 for details) and are consistent with previous literature35. The generated SF5 radicals are added to the olefin substrate 1, resulting in the formation of radical intermediate A (Path I), which is immediately trapped by oxygen gas to generate peroxide radical B. In contrast, Path II, which proposes chloropentafluorosulfanylated product C as the intermediate, is not supported by the control experiments presented in Fig. 5b. When C was employed under standard conditions, the desired product 4 was scarcely obtained. The peroxide radical B is then converted into the desired product via two distinct pathways. In one pathway, the hydrogen is extracted from water or solvent, followed by cleavage of the peroxide bond to yield product 3 or 4. Alternatively, the peroxide radical B undergoes direct radical-radical coupling to produce the dimer D. Subsequent homolysis of dimer D forms radical intermediate E, ultimately affording the desired hydroxypentafluorosulfanylation product 3 or 4.

Fig. 5: Mechanistic investigations and proposed mechanism for hydroxypentafluorosulfanylation of alkenes.
figure 5

a Radical capture experiment. b Control experiment of chloropentafluorosulfanylated product. c Deuteration experiment. d Control experiment of aliphatic alkene. e Proposed mechanism. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.05 mmol), 2 (0.1 mmol, ~0.3 M in n-hexane), H2O (0.05 mmol), O2 (0.09 mmol), 1-hexene (0.01 mmol), DCM (0.5 mL), 365 nm LEDs, r.t., 4 h, N2 atmosphere, isolated yields. N. D. denotes not detected.

Discussion

In summary, we have disclosed an efficient and practical methodology for the hydroxypentafluorosulfanylation of olefins, which occurs under mild conditions and has been successfully applied to both styrene and electron-withdrawing alkenes. Using the widely available reagent SF5Cl, this method enables the rapid synthesis of β-pentafluorosulfanyl alcohols. Of note, the reaction substrates are highly universal, rendering them suitable for the synthesis of complex SF5-substituted molecules. Furthermore, the post-functionalization reactions of β-pentafluorosulfanyl alcohols could provide rapid avenues to construct complex molecules containing the SF5 group. We believe that this hydroxypentafluorosulfanylation protocol will provide opportunities for applications in medicinal chemistry.

Methods

In a N2 glovebox, to alkene 1 (0.05 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was added 1-hexene (0.01 mmol, 0.20 equiv.) in a 10 mL sealed vial tube. Seal the bottle cap and then transfer it out of the glovebox. DCM (0.5 mL, 0.1 M), H2O (0.05 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), O2 (2 mL) and SF5Cl (dissolved in n-hexane, ~0.3 M, 0.1 mmol, 2.0 equiv.) were injected through a syringe into the reaction, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature under the 365 nm LEDs. Then, the reaction was diluted with DCM. The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo and the residue was purified by flash column chromatography with developing agent of petroleum ether and ethyl acetate to afford product 3 or 4.