Abstract
N-terminal acetylation is a highly abundant protein modification in eukaryotic cells. This modification is catalysed by N-terminal acetyltransferases acting co- or post-translationally. Here, we review the eukaryotic N-terminal acetylation machinery: the enzymes involved and their substrate specificities. We also provide an overview of the impact of N-terminal acetylation, including its effects on protein folding, subcellular targeting, protein complex formation, and protein turnover. In particular, there may be competition between N-terminal acetyltransferases and other enzymes in defining protein fate. At the organismal level, N-terminal acetylation is highly influential, and its impairment was recently linked to cardiac dysfunction and neurodegenerative diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
N-terminal (Nt) acetylation is a prevalent protein modification that affects about 50–80% of eukaryotic proteins1,2,3,4,5,6. Nt-acetylation involves the transfer of an acetyl moiety (COCH3) from acetyl-coenzyme A (Ac-CoA) to the amino group (NH3+) of the alpha carbon at the extreme N-terminus of a polypeptide or protein (Fig. 1). This reaction is catalysed by N-terminal acetyltransferases (NATs) and introduces a bulky and hydrophobic segment to the formerly positive NH3+ group. In eukaryotes, eight NATs have been identified (NatA–NatH) (Fig. 2)6. The different NATs are composed of one or several subunits, each termed N-alpha-acetyltransferases (NAAs), with a designated numbered suffix. Nt-acetylation can occur either co-translationally (NatA–NatE) or post-translationally (NatF–NatH). In brief, the co-translational NATs are conserved among all eukaryotes, whereas the post-translational NATs are mostly found in multicellular eukaryotes—animals and plants (Fig. 2)6. NatG, comprising a family of GNAT enzymes, is unique for plastids in plants7,8, NatF has a Golgi localisation in animals in contrast to its plasma membrane localisation in plants9,10, whilst the cytosolic NatH is unique for the animal kingdom11. Common for all the NATs is that their substrate specificities are predominantly determined by the first two to four amino acids of a substrate protein6,8.
A The eukaryotic family of N-terminal acetyltransferases (NATs) comprises eight enzyme types (NatA–NatH). NatA–NatE act co-translationally, modifying nascent polypeptides during their synthesis on the ribosome. In contrast, NatF–NatH operate post-translationally, targeting proteins after their synthesis6. NatF is localised on the cytosolic side of the Golgi apparatus (and of the plasma membrane in plants), modifying transmembrane proteins9,10. NatG is associated with plastids7,8, and NatH specifically Nt-acetylates actins11. The catalytic subunits of each NAT are designated NAA10–NAA90, with some NATs requiring auxiliary subunits (NAA15, HYPK, NAA25, NAA35, NAA38 and PFN2) for ribosome anchoring and modulation of enzymatic activity. Each NAT complex exhibits distinct substrate specificity, primarily determined by the first two to four amino acids. The indicated substrate specificity is defined by human and/or yeast NATs (and appears to be similar in plants), except for NatG, which is based on plant enzymes6,8. B All co-translational NATs (NatA–NatE) are conserved from yeast to metazoans and plants, but yeast NatE is likely catalytically inactive. NatF is present in both plants and metazoans, whereas NatG is exclusive to plants and NatH is only found in metazoans6. C Approximately 50–80% of the eukaryotic proteome is N-terminally acetylated (Nt-acetylome). In yeast, metazoans and plants, NatA accounts for the largest share of the Nt-acetylome, followed by NatB. NatC, NatE and NatF have overlapping substrate specificities in vitro, with varying coverage of the Nt-acetylome in eukaryotes4,5,6.
N-terminal acetyltransferases—masters of the Nt-acetylome
NatA was the first identified NAT, discovered in S. cerevisiae12 and later in multicellular eukaryotes4,13. This is the major NAT, responsible for Nt-acetylating ~40% of the human proteome1. NatA works co-translationally and is composed of the catalytic subunit NAA10 and the auxiliary subunit NAA15. NAA15 anchors the complex to the ribosome14,15,16,17 and modulates the substrate specificity18. NatA targets small Nt-amino acids (Ala, Ser, Thr, Val, Gly and Cys) exposed after the initiator methionine (iMet) has been cleaved off by a methionine aminopeptidase (MetAP)1,19,20,21. Recent cryo-EM structures uncovered that NatA and MetAPs concurrently bind close to the peptide tunnel exit of the ribosome, allowing for rapid and coordinated enzyme processing of the nascent polypeptide16,17. Huntingtin-interacting protein K (HYPK) is stably associated with the NatA complex in human and plant cells22,23. Paradoxically, HYPK inhibits NatA in vitro24,25 while promoting its activity in vivo22,23,26,27. The inhibitory effect of HYPK is likely relieved in vivo through an allosteric change in NatA-HYPK binding upon NACα recruitment of NatA at the ribosome17.
NatB acts co-translationally through its catalytic subunit NAA20, tethered to the ribosome by the auxiliary subunit NAA25, which wraps around NAA2028,29,30,31,32. As NatB Nt-acetylates 21% of the human proteome, it is also one of the major NATs. NatB operates specifically towards proteins with a retained iMet followed by a polar or acidic amino acid; Met-Asp, Met-Asn, Met-Glu, or Met-Gln-starting proteins33. NatB substrates typically have an Nt-acetylation stoichiometry of nearly 100%, unlike substrates of other multisubstrate NATs, which are often observed in both Nt-acetylated and non-Nt-acetylated states33.
The ternary NatC complex is composed of the catalytic subunit NAA30 and two auxiliary subunits—the ribosome-anchoring subunit NAA35 and the smaller subunit NAA38 with a less understood function34,35,36. A recent study revealed that human NAA38 broadens NatC’s substrate specificity and increases its thermostability by repositioning NAA30’s peptide binding loop to enhance catalysis and ordering an N-terminal fragment of NAA35, respectively37. NatC, similar to NatB, co-translationally acetylates iMet-retained proteins; however, with a specificity towards hydrophobic or basic amino acids in the second position. This includes Met-Leu, Met-Ile, Met-Phe, Met-Tyr, Met-Val, Met-Met, Met-Lys, or Met-His-starting proteins in human cells and, additionally, Met-Trp, Met-Ala and Met-Ser-starting proteins in yeast5,34,38,39,40.
Some NATs are highly selective, meaning that their active site only accommodates Nt-acetylation of substrates with very specific sequences. NatD is a selective NAT that co-translationally acetylates histones H2A and H4, requiring a four-residue Nt-sequence Ser-Gly-Arg-Gly (Ser-Gly-Gly-Lys in yeast H2A) after MetAP processing41,42,43. A few other substrates with a corresponding Nt-sequence may also be Nt-acetylated by NatD44. NatD activity was first observed in S. cerevisiae, where a NatA knockout (KO) strain contained Nt-acetylated Ser of histone H2A and H4, despite Nt-Ser being a canonical NatA substrate, revealing the presence of a selective NAT for histones12. Another distinct feature is that NatD consists solely of the catalytic unit NAA40, which is believed to be ribosome-binding as no auxiliary partners are identified41,42,43.
NAA50, the catalytic subunit of NatE, operates either bound to NatA on the ribosome or individually in the cytosol14,45,46,47. In humans, NAA50 binds to NatA via NAA15, inducing a conformational change in NAA10 that reduces NatA activity in vitro. Moreover, HYPK binding to NatE inhibits NAA50 in vitro by altering its substrate-binding site48. NatE acts co-translationally on proteins with a small amino acid in the second position, but unlike NatA, only if the iMet is retained (Met-Ala, Met-Ser, Met-Thr and Met-Val)47. However, such N-termini are commonly processed by MetAP, suggesting that Nt-acetylation by NatE shields some substrates from iMet removal if they are Nt-acetylated first. This portrays an interplay between NatA, NatE and MetAP in regulating Nt-acetylation of specific substrates, although the molecular mechanism is unclear. Interestingly, NatE has overlapping substrate specificity with NatC (and NatF) towards some hydrophobic or basic residues following the retained iMet (Met-Lys, Met-Tyr, Met-Phe, Met-Leu, Met-Ile)47,49,50, but the potential substrate redundancy is not fully understood. In A. thaliana, NAA50 exhibits canonical NatE substrate specificity and plays a vital role in plant immunity independent of NatA regulation51,52,53. In contrast, yeast NAA50 is catalytically inactive, but several NatA substrates have reduced Nt-acetylation in naa50-lacking yeast, indicating NAA50 has a scaffolding role aiding NatA catalysis15,47,54.
The first membrane-bound NAT identified was NatF, comprising the catalytic NAA60 enzyme as a monomer9,55. In human cells, NatF is associated with the Golgi apparatus through a unique C-terminal segment that inserts the protein at the cytosolic surface of the Golgi membrane56. In plants, NAA60 is associated with the plasma membrane, also through a C-terminal anchor10. Given its subcellular localisation, it is reasonable to assume NatF is a post-translational NAT acting specifically on transmembrane proteins9,10. NatF also has a preference for iMet-starting proteins when a Leu, Ile, Phe, Tyr, Val, Met, Lys, Gln, Thr, Ala, Gly, or Ser residue is in the second position9,55. Thus, NatF has overlapping substrate specificity with NatC and NatE, and together they Nt-acetylate 21% of the human proteome. However, the redundancy in vivo may be lower than it appears in vitro, considering NatF localises to the Golgi and Nt-acetylates transmembrane proteins. Additionally, the catalytic subunits of NatC, NatE and NatF differ in shape, hydrophobicity and electrostatic surface, suggesting these seemingly overlapping NATs likely have substrate determinants beyond the identity of the first two amino acids36.
Another organellar NAT is NatG, which is exclusive to the plant kingdom and localised in plastids7. The catalytic enzyme of NatG was initially named NAA70, but later an additional nine plant-specific enzymes with putative dual NAT and lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) activities were identified, called GNAT1-10 8. Today, NAA70 refers to GNAT4-7 and GNAT10, whilst GNAT1-3 is called NAA90—all functioning as plastid NATs, collectively called NatG8,57. NAA70 is present on the luminal (GNAT4, 5, 7 and 10) and cytosolic side (GNAT6) of plastids, whereas NAA90 (GNAT1-3) is exclusively in the plastid lumen. NAA70 post-translationally Nt-acetylates proteins starting with Met, Ala, Ser, Thr, or Val7,8,57. NAA90 in vivo substrates are mostly Ala, Ser, or Thr-starting proteins and there seems to be redundancy between GNAT1 and GNAT258.
The most recently discovered NAT is the animal kingdom NatH, consisting of the catalytic NAA80 enzyme. NatH acts post-translationally in the cytosol and is highly selective towards β- and γ-actin in non-muscle cells11,59,60. During translation, cytoplasmic β- and γ-actin are first co-translationally Nt-acetylated by NatB. After translation, a two-step maturation process is initiated. First, the actin maturation protease (ACTMAP) cleaves the Nt-acetylated iMet, producing a novel acidic N-terminus: Asp-Asp-Asp- for β-actin and Glu-Glu-Glu- for γ-actin61. NAA80 then completes maturation by Nt-acetylating the acidic N-terminus11. This post-translational maturation of actins, including cleavage and NAA80 activity, is exclusively found in animal cells6,11. ACTMAP and NAA80 also mature actins in muscle cells in a similar manner60,61,62,63. NAA80 stably associates with profilin (PFN), which binds globular (G-) actin and regulates actin filament formation62. Although PFN1 is more abundant in most cells, NAA80 (and ACTMAP) preferentially bind to the less abundant PFN264. The NAA80/PFN2 complex increases NAA80’s activity compared to NAA80 alone or with PFN1, suggesting that PFN2 chaperones actin Nt-acetylation by NAA80. Also, NAA80 merely associates with G-actin, not filamentous (F-) actin, indicating that the NAA80/PFN2 complex Nt-acetylates G-actin prior to its incorporation into F-actin64.
Destinies of N-terminally acetylated proteins
Through the introduction of a hydrophobic and bulky acetyl group, Nt-acetylation alters the N-terminal characteristics of proteins, thereby potentially influencing their function and fate. The functional implications for proteins receiving Nt-acetylation include protein folding and aggregation, protein-protein interaction, subcellular targeting and stability and turnover (Fig. 3)6. The diverse functional implications reflect the broad substrate pool undergoing Nt-acetylation, and the functional consequences are dependent on the specific target protein rather than a unique role of Nt-acetylation6. Different effects of Nt-acetylation could also be causally linked; for instance, protein degradation observed due to the presence or absence of an Nt-acetyl group could be secondary to aberrant folding, membrane binding, or protein complex formation.
N-terminal acetylation has varying effects depending on the function of the substrate. Here, four main functions of Nt-acetylation are summarised. A Nt-acetylation may facilitate correct protein folding, maintaining protein solubility and function, while the non-Nt-acetylated variant is prone to aggregation22,68,70,71. B Protein-protein interactions may depend on Nt-acetylation, increasing the ability to bind hydrophobic binding grooves and enhancing the formation of functional protein complexes28,82,84. C Some substrates depend on Nt-acetylation to achieve correct subcellular localisation, ensuring they reach their functional destinations within the cell35,88,89,90,91. D Nt-acetylation can protect proteins from degradation, contributing to their stability and longevity39,94,95. However, some Nt-acetylated proteins may be targeted for degradation through conditional mechanisms, such as correct stoichiometry, folding and protein-protein interactions111,112.
The effect of Nt-acetylation on protein folding and aggregation
Initial studies demonstrated that Nt-acetylation stabilises the α-helix formation of peptides by providing hydrogen bond formation to the main-chain NH-group65. This was later supported by structural studies of certain polypeptides66,67. Nt-acetylation was also suggested to have a global role in protein folding due to the accumulation of misfolded proteins in NatA-depleted yeast cells68.
Nt-acetylation of alpha-Synuclein (αSyn) is associated with enhanced folding and decreased aggregation. Aggregation of αSyn is involved in the development of Parkinson’s disease, and as a Met-Asp-starting protein, it is likely Nt-acetylated by NatB33,69. Several in vitro studies have shown that non-acetylated αSyn is more prone to aggregation compared to Nt-acetylated αSyn70,71,72. Nt-acetylation of αSyn preserves its native conformation by stabilising an α-helix structure formed by the N-terminus72,73. Additionally, it prevents aggregation and fibril assembly by disrupting the hydrogen bonds present in αSyn oligomers70,72,73. The fibrils formed by Nt-acetylated or non-acetylated αSyn are also morphologically different; the non-acetylated variant has more β-sheet formation compared to the acetylated variant, which is known to increase fibrillation71. Hence, Nt-acetylation aids in correct conformation and prevents aggregation.
Huntingtin (Htt) is another protein prone to aggregation, which is believed to cause neuronal death, leading to Huntington’s disease74. Htt is found Nt-acetylated in mammalian cells74 and demonstrated to be a NatA substrate in vitro75. HYPK, which is a part of the NatA complex, acts as a chaperone for Htt and HYPK knockdown (KD) increases Htt aggregation22. HYPK is also essential for normal NatA-mediated Nt-acetylation in plants and human cells22,23,26. Both wild type and a pathogenic variant of Htt are detected as Nt-acetylated in human cells74,76 and initial findings indicated that intact NatA activity prevents cellular Htt aggregation22. However, a recent in vitro study of purified Htt variants suggests that Nt-acetylation of Htt increases its aggregation propensity compared to non-acetylated Htt75, emphasising that the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of HYPK and NatA on Htt folding and aggregation remain to be clarified.
Nt-acetylation mediates interactions with proteins and subcellular structures
Whether dependent of folding effects or not, Nt-acetylation can promote protein-protein interactions beyond self-aggregation. A classic example is the impact of Nt-acetylation on tropomyosin function. Early studies suggested that a native and Nt-acetylated tropomyosin is essential for obtaining an α-helical structure67,77,78 and thereby functionality, including filament formation and binding to F-actin79,80,81. Different tropomyosin isoforms are Nt-acetylated by NatA or NatB depending on their sequence33,82. A recent intein-based expression method using human cells demonstrated by direct comparison that Nt-acetylated tropomyosin binds F-actin more strongly than the non-acetylated tropomyosin82. In agreement with these direct protein-level effects, impaired tropomyosin Nt-acetylation has been linked to several cytoskeletal phenotypes in yeast and mammalian cells28,29,33.
In yeast and humans, the E2 neddylation enzymes UBE2F and UBE2M (Yeast: Ubc12) are Nt-acetylated by NatC. This increases their binding affinity towards the hydrophobic pocket of DCNL E3 ligases, forming a cognate E2/E3 complex that promotes cullin neddylation83,84. Another example is how Nt-acetylation of the yeast transcriptional regulator Sir3 stabilises its structure, enhancing its interaction with nucleosomes85,86. A global proteomics analysis uncovered that yeast lacking NatA displayed reduced thermostability of ribosomes and proteasomes, suggesting that Nt-acetylation of ribosomal and proteasomal proteins is important for their folding and interactions in these large complexes87.
By promoting interactions with specific proteins or structures, Nt-acetylation may also facilitate correct subcellular localisation. In A. thaliana, Nt-acetylation of various chloroplast precursor-proteins is suggested to play an important role in directing them to the chloroplasts88. Similarly, in yeast and human cells, NatC-mediated Nt-acetylation of Arl8b is required for lysosomal membrane association35,89. Furthermore, ARFRP1 (Yeast: Arl3p) requires Nt-acetylation to be Golgi-localised through protein-protein interaction with SYS1 (Yeast: Sys1p), a Golgi multi-pass membrane protein90,91.
Nt-acetylation—imprinting protein stability and conditional protein degradation
A function of Nt-acetylation that has gained prominence lately is to prevent protein degradation by shielding the N-terminus, which otherwise (in its non-acetylated state) may act as an N-degron. An N-degron is an N-terminal sequence that is recognised as a degradation signal by ubiquitin (Ub) E3 ligases, marking the protein for degradation by ubiquitination of a nearby lysine residue92,93. Several recent efforts have elucidated the major protective role of Nt-acetylation39,94,95. In A. thaliana, depletion of NatA activity resulted in a 4-fold increase in protein turnover via the ubiquitin-proteasome system, leading to the identification of the non-AcX2 (X = Ala, Ser, or Gly) N-degron23,95. However, not all non-acetylated Ala-, Ser-, or Gly-starting proteins tested were targeted for degradation, emphasising that there are several determinant parameters, such as an accessible lysine for poly-ubiquitination near the exposed N-terminus93. In human cells, a handful of NatA substrates were shown to interact with inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) E3 ligases, but only the non-acetylated form94. In addition, non-modified NatA substrates (Gly-, Ala-, Ser-, Thr- and Cys-) may act as N-degrons for the E3 ligases CRL2-ZER1/ZYG11B96,97,98. Hence, classic NatA substrates that fail to undergo Nt-acetylation can be targeted for degradation by E3 ligases (IAPs or CRL2-ZER1/ZYG11B) in the recently named GASTC/N-degron pathway93,99—ensuring protein quality control and protein homoeostasis.
In S. cerevisiae and mammals, a basic or hydrophobic residue in the first position of a protein is known to be a destabilising N-degron, recognised by UBR Ub E3 ligases92,100—known as the Arg/N-degron pathway. Arg/N-degrons are divided into type 1: Arg, Lys and His (basic residues), and type 2: Phe, Trp, Tyr, Leu and Ile (hydrophobic residues). Notably, Asp, Asn, Gln, Glu and Cys can be post-translationally modified into Nt-Arg (Type 1) following deamidation (Asn to Asp, Gln to Glu) or oxidation (Cys), and by direct arginylation (Asp, Glu)93. In S. cerevisiae, Ubr1 is the responsible Ub E3 ligase (N-recognin), while in mammals there are at least four UBR enzymes: UBR1, UBR2, UBR4 and UBR593,100. Furthermore, UBR4 works in a complex with KCMF1101. NatC Nt-acetylates iMet followed by a hydrophobic or basic residue and such N-termini are also recognised by UBR Ub E3 ligases when not Nt-acetylated. Consequently, NatC-mediated Nt-acetylation protects these N-termini from UBR-recognition and proteasomal degradation of the protein39. In NatC KO cell lines, several NatC substrates are degraded by UBR1, UBR2, or UBR4-KCMF1 due to the lack of Nt-acetylation. Genome-wide unbiased CRISPR KO screening uncovered UBR components as strong positive genetic interactors of NatC subunits, and removal of UBR Ub E3 ligases reversed NatC KO phenotypes, revealing a major role of NatC in shielding proteins from degradation39.
Normal co-translational protein processing rarely produces proteins recognised by the Arg/N-degron pathway. N-termini like Phe, Leu, Asp, Glu, and Arg are usually not exposed because MetAP only cleaves the iMet if the second amino acid is small. An exception is some Met-hydrophobic N-termini that leave the ribosome non-Nt-acetylated and can be targets for the Arg/N-degron pathway6. Instead, many Arg/N-degron pathway targets are generated through post-translational processing by proteases like caspases or signal peptidases93. Another notable exception is Met-Cys-starting proteins. After canonical co-translational Met-cleavage, the resulting Cys N-terminus may be oxidised by ADO (in mammalian cells) or PCOs (in plants), followed by Nt-arginylation and proteasomal degradation by UBRs93,102,103,104,105,106. These represent key oxygen-sensing pathways in multicellular eukaryotes, where regulatory proteins such as RGS4/5 (G-protein signalling regulators) in humans and ERF-VII transcription factors in plants are stabilised during hypoxia. Cys N-termini can also be Nt-acetylated by NatA, and NatA-mediated Nt-acetylation and ADO-mediated Nt-oxidation are mutually exclusive modifications21. For most Cys-starting proteins, there seems to be no competition between Nt-acetylation and Nt-oxidation due to the substrate specificities of NatA and ADO; Cys-acidic/polar N-termini are preferentially Nt-acetylated, while Cys-aromatic/basic N-termini are oxidised. For a few Cys-starting proteins that are substrates of both NatA and ADO, Nt-acetylation could prevent ADO-mediated oxidation and subsequent arginylation and degradation21. In addition, unmodified Cys-starting N-termini could be targeted by the previously mentioned CRL2-ZER1/ZYG11B E3 ligases97.
NatB-mediated acetylation is suggested to protect certain substrates from proteasomal degradation107,108,109. However, NatB is not considered a main factor in proteostasis, as no global effect on protein stability was observed in NatB-deficient yeast cells110. In mice, NatB-mediated acetylation is believed to shield procaspase-8 and -9 from UBR4- and UBR1-mediated degradation, respectively, facilitating apoptosis activation109. In D. melanogaster, citrate metabolism has been linked to increased protein stability due to increased NatB-mediated Nt-acetylation in male flies107. In fruit flies with reduced NatB activity, phenotypes like decreased fertility and spermatid differentiation and increased proteasomal turnover were observed; however, these were rescued by dUBR1 KD107. This suggests that NatB protects key proteins involved in fertility and spermatid differentiation from proteasomal degradation, although the involved NatB substrate(s) remain unidentified. In addition, NatB was recently revealed as a regulator of αSyn, and the absence of NatB was shown to increase the proteasomal turnover of αSyn108. Ube2w, an E2 Ub-conjugating enzyme, is suggested to be involved in the degradation of non-acetylated αSyn108. However, further evidence is needed, as the causality remains unclear, particularly since no physical interaction has been identified between non-acetylated NatB-type N-termini and Ub ligases. In summary, these recent efforts indicate that Nt-acetylation leaves an imprint on the proteome, promoting protein stability. While NatA and NatC are proposed to have a more general role in protein stability, NatB appears to shield only a subset of proteins from degradation.
Conditionally, Nt-acetylated proteins can be recognised by E3 ligases through another N-degron pathway, called the Ac/N-degron pathway111,112. Under normal conditions, the Nt-acetylated protein terminus may not be exposed due to folding, interactions with membranes, or other proteins (see above). Aberrant folding, protein complex formation, etc. may expose such Nt-acetylated termini to E3 ligases, which can subsequently target these proteins for degradation. The first Ac/N-degrons were discovered in yeast, where Nt-acetylated Met-, Ala-, Ser-, Thr-, or Val-starting proteins were shown to be recognised by the E3 ligases Doa10 or Not4111,112. Ac/N-degron conditionality and shielding by protein complex formation were demonstrated for the S. cerevisiae Cog1 subunit of the oligomeric Golgi (COG) complex and the S. pombe Hcn1 subunit of the APC/C (anaphase-promoting complex) Ub ligase111. A well-known human protein degraded through the Ac/N-degron pathway is the RGS2 protein113. RGS2 is a Met-Gln-starting protein that is Nt-acetylated by NatB and only recognised by MARCHF6 (Yeast orthologue: Doa10) in its Nt-acetylated form113. MARCHF6 KD stabilised RGS2 expression, while overexpression of MARCHF6 destabilised RGS2. Furthermore, MARCHF6 pulls down RGS2 only in its acetylated form113. Overall, this supports that the acetyl group is essential for MARCHF6 recognition. In vivo, RGS2 is fully Nt-acetylated by NatB and forms a complex with Gαq-protein, which shields its N-terminus in the complex. Thus, the N-terminus is only exposed and susceptible for degradation when the protein-protein complex is not in stoichiometric balance113. Recently, the recognition domain (Ac/N-domain) of MARCHF6, which specifically binds to and mediates the degradation of Nt-acetylated substrates like RGS2 and PLIN2, but not the non-acetylated counterparts, was identified114.
Combined, the Ac/N-degron, GASTC/N-degron and Arg/N-degron pathways may control a large number of proteins in an Nt-acetylation-dependent manner. While co-translational Nt-acetylation is likely to shield a major part of the proteome from being targeted by the GASTC/N-degron- and Arg/N-degron pathways, the Ac/N-degron pathway may ensure protein quality control and correct protein-protein stoichiometry (Fig. 4)99.
The major co-translational NATs (NatA, NatB and NatC) Nt-acetylate nascent polypeptides at the ribosome. NatA Nt-acetylates small amino acids (Ala, Ser, Thr, Val, Gly, Cys) after the initiator methionine (iMet) is excised by MetAPs1,20,21. NatB Nt-acetylates N-termini with a retained iMet followed by Asp, Glu, Asn, or Gln33. Similarly, NatC acts on iMet-retained N-termini, but with a hydrophobic or basic amino acid in the second position (Leu, Ile, Phe, Val, Tyr, Met, His, or Lys)38. Nt-acetylation imprints protein stability by protecting proteins from proteasomal degradation mediated by ubiquitin (Ub) E3 ligases. However, the Ub E3 ligase MARCHF6 can recognise certain Nt-acetylated N-termini and confer conditional protein degradation through the Ac/N-degron pathway113, potentially as a protein quality control mechanism. In cells with impaired NAT function, non-acetylated N-termini can be recognised by specific Ub E3 ligases and targeted for proteasomal degradation through the N-degron pathways93. In human cells, several Ub E3 ligases recognise non-Nt-acetylated NatA substrates. In the GASTC/N-degron pathway, inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), including XIAP, BIRC2, BIRC3 and BIRC6, act on N-termini starting with Ala or Ser94, while the Cullin 2-RING E3 Ub ligase (CRL2) substrate receptors, ZYG11B and ZER1, recognise Gly, Ala, Ser, Thr, or Cys-starting N-termini96,97. Additionally, UBRs can mediate the degradation of Cys-starting proteins through the Arg/N-degron pathway following oxidation by ADO and subsequent arginylation by ATE193. This degradation route is likely less common for non-Nt-acetylated Cys-starting substrates of NatA, as NatA and ADO have distinct substrate preferences21. In A. thaliana, global proteome destabilisation was observed following NatA depletion, but the responsible Ub E3 ligases are not identified95. The Ub E3 ligases UBR4–KCMF1, UBR1 and UBR2 mediate degradation of non-Nt-acetylated NatC substrates39. NatB may shield a certain subset of proteins from degradation. Non-Nt-acetylated NatB substrates are potentially recognised by UBR1 in D. melanogaster107 and by UBR1 and UBR4 in mice109. Human Ub ligases that recognise non-Nt-acetylated NatB substrates are not established, but Ube2w may be involved in degradation of non-acetylated αSyn in human cells108.
Cellular and organismal impact of N-terminal acetylation
Nt-acetylation is evolutionarily conserved among eukaryotes1. Although a complete understanding of its physiological roles is still lacking, studies in various species have shown that NATs significantly impact cellular function as well as organismal development and physiology. In most cases, we may assume that NAT impairment reduces Nt-acetylation which mediates cellular and physiological effects. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that some effects may arise from non-canonical functions of the NATs, not involving protein Nt-acetylation6.
NatA is essential in higher eukaryotes, and NatA removal causes lethality in several model organisms such as T. brucei, C. elegans, D. melanogaster, A. thaliana, D. rerio and human cells6. Contrastingly, NatA is dispensable in yeast, but NatA deletion strains have defects in growth, sporulation, mating, transition to G0 phase and increased stress sensitivity1,12. More recently, a multi-level study of S. cerevisiae implicated NatA in systemic adaptation control and maintenance of genome integrity110. Specifically, NatA activity regulates Sir3- and Orc1-mediated gene silencing and expression of transposons, mitochondrial genes, pheromone response genes and sub-telomeric genes110. Yeast cells lacking NatA also showed upregulation of the ubiquitin proteasome system115. In M. musculus and D. rerio, NAA10 is crucial for normal development. Morpholino-mediated KD of zebrafish naa10 resulted in increased lethality, while surviving morphants had impaired growth and developmental defects116. Naa10 KO mice also displayed developmental abnormalities, including partial embryonic lethality, growth failure, brain defects and cardiac anomalies117,118. Surprisingly, Naa10 KO mice did not show global Nt-acetylome impairment, leading to the discovery of a compensatory paralogue, denoted Naa12, which exerts NatA activity when bound to NAA15118. Furthermore, mice lacking both Naa10 and Naa12 resulted in embryonic death. NatA deficiency in A. thaliana causes embryonic lethality4,119, incomplete endosperm cellularisation120 and increased drought resistance4 (Fig. 5A). HYPK is a positive regulator of NatA activity in A. thaliana and the rice plant O. sativa, with HYPK depletion causing developmental defects and increased stress tolerance, consistent with the phenotypes in NatA-depleted plants23,27.
A Summary of the physiological impact of NATs in A. thaliana57. B NatC prevents age-dependent motility loss in D. melanogaster. NatC KO fruit flies exhibit muscle developmental defects and motility loss, and these phenotypes are rescued upon UbcE2M overexpression39. C In yeast, NatD-mediated Nt-acetylation (Ac) of histone H4 normally antagonises the methylation (Me) of H4 Arg3, which regulates yeast lifespan. Under calorie restriction, yeast NatD and Nt-acetylation of histone H4 are downregulated, resulting in increased levels of H4 Arg3 methylation and induction of stress response genes such as PNC1, which promotes yeast longevity128. D Post-translational Nt-acetylation of actin mediated by NAA80 in human cells affects cytoskeletal dynamics. Human NAA80 KO cells lacking Nt-acetylation of actin display more cell protrusions and increased cell motility, implicating NAA80 as a cell migration regulator11. KD knockdown, KO knockout.
NatB is non-essential in yeast, like any other yeast NAT, but NatB deletion strains display the most severe phenotypes, including growth, cytoskeleton and mating defects28,29. These phenotypes may result from impaired actin cable formation, as NatB-dependent Nt-acetylation of tropomyosin is a prerequisite for its ability to bind and stabilise actin filaments28,29. Similarly, NatB KD in human and mouse cells causes proliferation arrest, impaired cytoskeleton organisation and decreased motility30,33,109. Mouse Naa20 KO cells have reduced extrinsic apoptosis activation, likely due to NatB-mediated Nt-acetylation of procaspase-8, shielding it from UBR-mediated degradation109. Multi-omics analyses showed that NatB deletion in S. cerevisiae leads to protein aggregate accumulation and stress response induction, indicating a role of NatB in cellular proteostasis110. This is supported by findings in D. melanogaster, where NatB-mediated Nt-acetylation was found to be essential for spermatid differentiation, possibly by shielding key proteins from dUBR1-mediated degradation107. Loss of NatB in A. thaliana is associated with pleiotropic developmental defects and growth retardation (Fig. 5A)31,121. Unlike the drought resistant NatA-deficient plants, NatB-deficient plants show increased sensitivity to drought, high osmolarity, high salinity and reductive stress, indicating NatB is essential for abiotic stress tolerance31,122. NatB is also implicated in pathogen resistance in plants31,123. A study found that NatA and NatB antagonistically regulate two proteoforms of the plant immune receptor SNC1, with NatA destabilising and NatB stabilising SNC1, affecting the immune response123. Recently, NatB was proposed to play a role in viral infection in yeast and human cells, where NatB activity facilitates Influenza A virus’s suppression of host gene expression and viral polymerase activity124.
NatC is believed to exert important roles in organellar biology and energy regulation. In yeast, all three NatC subunits, NAA30, NAA35 and NAA38, are necessary for NatC-mediated Nt-acetylation34. Deletion of any yeast NatC subunits produces slow growth phenotypes, but unlike yeast NatA and NatB deletions, mating efficiency remains unaffected34. In contrast, the auxiliary subunits of NatC in A. thaliana are dispensable, as only the removal of NAA30, but not NAA35, impairs photosynthesis and growth (Fig. 5A)88. In C. elegans, NatC regulates the balance between reproductive growth and stress tolerance in response to nutrients and stressors125,126. NatC deficiency in human cells disrupts mitochondrial morphology and function and increases lysosomal content and cell granularity38,39. These phenotypes are likely linked to NatC’s role in shielding the proteome from degradation, as they were reversed by UBR KD39. Furthermore, these findings were supported by studies in D. melanogaster, where NatC was shown to be essential for longevity, fertility and prevention of age-dependent motility loss39. The decreased longevity and motility in NatC deletion flies were rescued by muscle-specific overexpression of UbcE2M, the fruit fly homologue of the human NEDD8-conjugating enzymes UBE2M and UBE2F, which are degraded when lacking NatC-mediated Nt-acetylation. This supports a role of NatC in protecting against protein degradation and in normal muscle development in D. melanogaster (Fig. 5B)39.
NatD-mediated Nt-acetylation of histone H2A and H4 is implicated in the regulation of cellular metabolism. Initial yeast studies showed only minor growth defects in naa40Δ strains under certain conditions127. A later study found that calorie restriction downregulated yeast naa40 and Nt-acetylation of histone H4, resulting in increased levels of H4 Arg3 methylation and induction of stress response genes such as PNC1, promoting yeast longevity. This implicates a role for naa40 in regulating cellular lifespan in yeast (Fig. 5C)128,129. In mouse hepatocytes, Naa40 depletion increased cellular Ac-CoA levels, resulting in lipid synthesis induction and impaired insulin signalling130. In agreement with these findings, NAA40 KD in D. melanogaster larval fat body, which is analogous to the mammalian liver, also coincided with increased lipid synthesis130. In the model insect T. castaneum, NAA40 KD upregulated genes involved in lipid biosynthesis and arrested larval development, possibly due to epigenetic modulation of the steroid hormone ecdysone during metamorphosis131. Together, these studies highlight a role of NAA40 in lipid metabolism, although further studies are needed to fully understand the molecular mechanisms involved.
Although NAA50 (NatE) interacts with NatA, it has a different substrate specificity and loss of NAA50 produces distinct cellular phenotypes. In human and D. melanogaster cells, NAA50 removal causes aberrant sister chromatid cohesion, mitotic arrest and chromosome segregation defects46,132,133. This phenotype might be conserved among metazoans, as no phenotypes are observed in naa50Δ yeast strains and yeast NAA50 is likely catalytically inactive14,54. In A. thaliana, loss of NAA50 causes severe growth impairments and infertility (Fig. 5A)51,134. Moreover, NAA50 depletion renders plants hypersensitive to abscisic acid and osmotic stress, but increases pathogen resistance, suggesting NAA50 plays an important role in plant development and stress responses51,53,134.
Similarly to NAA50, NAA60 (NatF) KD in D. melanogaster induces chromosomal segregation defects during anaphase but displays normal metaphase, unlike the mitotic arrest observed in NAA50-depleted cells55. In HeLa cells, NAA60 KD caused Golgi ribbon fragmentation9, possibly linked to the impaired segregation phenotype, as Golgi fragmentation occurs in a controlled fashion during mitosis. Since NAA60 is Golgi-localised in human cells and Nt-acetylates transmembrane proteins, the fragmented Golgi phenotype may indicate that NAA60 itself or some of its transmembrane substrates are important for Golgi integrity9. NAA60 also promotes influenza A virus infection, likely by suppressing IFNα and IFN-stimulated genes135. Interestingly, the A. thaliana NAA60 orthologue is anchored exclusively to the plasma membrane and mediates high salt stress adaptation (Fig. 5A)10.
While Nt-acetylation occurs on 20-30% of all plastid proteins57, the physiological roles of the plastid-NatG family are not fully understood and their dual KAT and NAT function adds an extra layer of complexity. Studies of GNAT2 (NAA90) in A. thaliana showed that GNAT2 is required for state transitions and pathogen resistance, but likely through its lysine and serotonin acetyltransferase activity57.
The most recently identified NAT, NAA80 (NatH), is exclusively found in animals where it post-translationally modifies cytosolic actins11. Since actins are NAA80’s only known substrates, phenotypes resulting from NAA80 impairment likely result from lack of actin Nt-acetylation. Human NAA80 KO cells exhibit several cytoskeleton-related phenotypes, including increased cell protrusions and accelerated motility, pointing to NAA80 as an essential cell migration regulator (Fig. 5D)11. Additionally, NAA80 KO cells display increased F-actin levels and Golgi fragmentation, linked to NAA80’s ability to modify actin, as reintroducing active NAA80 rescued the phenotype136. Interestingly, a D. rerio naa80 KO model lacking Nt-acetylated actin showed no obvious effects on zebrafish viability, development, or behaviour63. However, naa80-depleted zebrafish had aberrant inner ear development and impaired hearing63, consistent with hearing loss in humans with NAA80 variants137, suggesting naa80 is important for normal hearing. A recent study suggested NAA80 plays a role in viral infection, where NAA80 acts as a host factor by promoting viral replication for several viruses such as Enterovirus 71138.
Relevance for human disease
The NAT machinery plays an important role in human development and physiology, and aberrant Nt-acetylation is associated with human pathologies such as cancer, developmental syndromes and neurodegenerative diseases.
NATs in genetic disease
Pathogenic variants in different NAT genes can cause rare genetic diseases in humans. The lethal X-linked disorder Ogden syndrome, caused by a NAA10 p.(Ser37Pro) variant, was first described in 2011139. The eight affected boys from two families exhibited developmental delay, aged appearance, hypotonia, craniofacial anomalies and cardiac arrhythmias, and died within 2 years of life. Biochemical studies revealed that the p.(Ser37Pro) variant had reduced catalytic activity and impaired complex formation with both NAA15 and NAA50139,140.
In the succeeding years, several pathogenic variants in NAA10 and NAA15, encoding the NatA subunits, were identified as causes of congenital diseases in both males and females. These conditions are collectively known as NAA10- and NAA15-related syndromes141,142,143,144,145. Affected individuals exhibit phenotypic heterogeneity with regard to clinical features and severity, often including developmental delay, intellectual disability and cardiac anomalies145. Recent studies have used induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to investigate heart defects caused by NAA10 and NAA15 variants. iPSCs with NAA15 haploinsufficiency showed moderately impaired Nt-acetylation levels and reduced protein levels for many proteins, including ribosomal proteins. Four of these downregulated proteins are previously associated with autosomal dominant congenital heart disease, potentially contributing to the heart disease caused by defective NAA15143. In iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes expressing NAA10 variants, long QT syndrome was linked to abnormal Cav1.2 channel gating properties146. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms underlying NAA10- and NAA15-related syndromes remain poorly understood. The phenotype variability may be influenced by several factors, such as genetic background differences, tissue-specific effects caused by skewed X-chromosome inactivation in females and the impact of different variants on the function and stability of numerous NatA substrates.
In recent years, pathogenic variants in other NAT genes have emerged. Biallelic NAA20 variants were found in seven individuals from three families with a neurodevelopmental disorder, named NAA20-related syndrome147,148. These individuals exhibited overlapping phenotypes, including intellectual disability, developmental delay and microcephaly, with variable occurrence of congenital heart defects, ataxia, and epilepsy. Biochemical assays indicated that the NAA20 variants impaired NatB complex formation and NatB-mediated Nt-acetylation.
A heterozygous nonsense variant in the NAA30 gene was identified in an individual presenting with global developmental delay, autism spectrum disorder and a tracheal cleft149. These clinical manifestations were linked to aberrant NatC-mediated Nt-acetylation due to truncation of the catalytic subunit NAA30.
NAA60 was recently established as a causal gene for autosomal recessive primary familial brain calcifications (PFBC), a neurodegenerative disorder characterised by abnormal calcium deposition in the brain150. Ten individuals from seven families with autosomal recessive PFBC harboured biallelic missense variants or deletion variants in the NAA60 gene. These variants attenuated NAA60-mediated Nt-acetylation, and the disease mechanism involved impaired cellular phosphate homeostasis associated with the loss-of-function NAA60 variants150.
A homozygous NAA80 p.(Leu130Pro) variant affecting the actin NAT was identified in two brothers with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss, developmental delay, muscle weakness and craniofacial dysmorphisms137. The NAA80 variant showed reduced Nt-acetylation of actin subtypes and impaired actin dynamics in patient-derived cells. Interestingly, individuals with pathogenic β-actin and γ-actin variants display similar phenotypes, suggesting that the clinical features are linked to disrupted actin function137.
Deficient Nt-acetylation by the major NATs–NatA, NatB and NatC—leads to overlapping global phenotypes, despite having different classes of substrates1,33,38. This may be attributed to their large substrate pools, potentially affecting thousands of proteins, resulting in pleiotropic effects and broad phenotypes like intellectual disability and developmental delay. In contrast, pathogenic variants in NAA60 and NAA80 appear to cause more specific clinical features137,150, reflecting their specialised roles with limited substrate pools comprising transmembrane proteins and actins, respectively9,11,59,60. An overview of pathogenic NAT variants and associated phenotypes is shown in Fig. 6. So far, no disease-causing variants have been described in the catalytic subunits NAA40 (NatD) or NAA50 (NatE).
Schematic representation of the pathogenic variants identified in various NAT subunits, their associated phenotypes and the number of affected individuals. Impairment of the major co-translational NATs (NatA-NatC) results in severe and general phenotypes141,142,143,144,145,147,148,149. In contrast, impairment of the specific post-translational NatF (NAA60) and NatH (NAA80) is linked to brain calcification150 or abnormal hearing and muscles137, respectively. The Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferase (GNAT) domains of the catalytic NAT subunits are shown in dark blue.
NATs in cancer
Several of the NATs are suggested to play critical roles in cancer development and progression. NATs are prevalently found upregulated in various types of cancers and are recognised as potential prognostic markers and therapeutic targets in cancer treatment.
Overexpression of NAA10 has been observed in multiple types of cancer and is associated with overall survival rates and disease recurrence in patients151. NAA10 is believed to play a key role in cancer cell proliferation and survival by modulating cellular processes such as cell cycle progression, migration, apoptosis and autophagy152,153,154,155,156,157,158. Increased NAA10 expression correlates with tumour aggressiveness and metastasis in lung159, prostate160,161, liver162, renal163 and colorectal cancer164,165, indicating an oncogenic role. Conversely, NAA10 may act as a tumour suppressor in breast cancer and oral squamous cell carcinoma, where increased NAA10 expression correlates negatively with lymph node metastasis and positively with patient survival166,167,168. While the functions of NAA10 in malignancies are not well understood, several mechanisms have been proposed, some of which involve non-canonical roles of NAA10151. Depletion of NatA-mediated Nt-acetylation induces growth inhibition and apoptosis in cervical, colon and thyroid cancer cells. Furthermore, NatA KD sensitises cancer cells to drug treatment169,170.
Early studies showed that NatB is essential for cell proliferation and survival in cancer cell lines, implicating its role in tumorigenesis30,171. Moreover, NAA20 was found upregulated in both a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mouse model and HCC patients171. These findings were supported by recent studies, which proposed that the oncogenic role of NAA20 in HCC involves the regulation of autophagic and proliferative signalling pathways172,173. In triple-negative breast cancer, increased NAA20 expression correlates with poor patient survival and NAA20 depletion decreased cancer cell growth, migration and invasion174. Analogous to NAA20, NAA25 was found overexpressed in breast cancer and NAA25 KD was correlated with apoptosis and decreased cell growth175.
NatC KD has been shown to cause growth arrest and p53-dependent apoptosis in cancer cells, suggesting NatC is crucial for cancer cell proliferation and survival35. Notably, NAA30 is upregulated at the protein level in glioblastoma and glioblastoma-initiating cells (GICs)176. In vitro and in vivo analyses demonstrated that NAA30 depletion reduced cell growth and viability of GICs, possibly via the p53 pathway, indicating an important role of NAA30 in glioblastoma tumorigenesis.
Overexpression of the histone NAT NAA40 is associated with tumour growth and metastasis in various cancers, including breast177, lung178, liver179 and colorectal cancer180 and negatively impacts patient survival. NAA40 is considered a critical epigenetic modulator in cancer progression and may influence chemoresistance177,178,181.
A pan-cancer analysis indicated NAA50 as an oncogene overexpressed in many cancers, including lung adenocarcinoma, with potential implications for cell proliferation and immune cell infiltration182.
NATs in neurodegenerative diseases
As mentioned, pathogenic NAA60 variants and thus impaired Nt-acetylation of transmembrane proteins, may cause the neurodegenerative disease PFBC with Parkinson’s like symptoms150. Furthermore, aggregation of the neuronal protein αSyn plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease and other synucleinopathies71,183. αSyn is found Nt-acetylated in brain tissue, and its N-terminus is likely a substrate of NatB. Nt-acetylation of αSyn affects its stability, aggregation process and neurotoxicity71,184. A recent study demonstrated that NatB is a strong regulator of endogenous αSyn in human cell lines108. Loss of NatB-mediated Nt-acetylation resulted in decreased stability of non-acetylated αSyn, while the degradation of αSyn might be rescued by depletion of the E2 Ub-conjugating enzyme Ube2w. Thus, these findings implicate that NatB has an indirect role in Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis through its regulation of αSyn, and targeting NatB-mediated Nt-acetylation of αSyn could be a potential therapeutic strategy108. Huntington’s disease is a neurodegenerative disorder linked to the aggregation of the Htt protein. In vitro work demonstrated that Htt is a substrate of NatA75, but as described earlier, there are conflicting results regarding the impact of Nt-acetylation on Htt and its aggregation propensity22,75. Thus, NatA-mediated Nt-acetylation may impact Huntington’s disease by affecting Htt aggregation, but the mechanism remains unclear.
Conclusions and outstanding questions
The machinery responsible for Nt-acetylation in eukaryotes is likely fully or nearly fully identified (Fig. 2). However, additional NATs may exist, potentially targeting distinct substrates not covered by the general multisubstrate NATs or specifically operating in organelles such as mitochondria. While the structures and modus operandi for most of these enzymes have been determined, there is limited knowledge on how this modification is regulated at the gene or post-translational level. Although Nt-acetylation is considered irreversible, it is possible that a hitherto unidentified N-terminal deacetylase (NDAC) could exist to regulate specific proteins.
The high abundance and patterns of Nt-acetylation in representative eukaryotic species are defined, but we only have direct mass spectrometry evidence for the Nt-acetylation of a minor fraction of the proteome1,5,9,33,47. Thus, increased coverage could uncover sub-patterns and substrates of special interest. The molecular roles of Nt-acetylation are diverse, with many different functions identified for single proteins (Fig. 3). Recent investigations uncovered that protein degradation shielding may be a major constitutive function of Nt-acetylation in the plant and animal kingdoms39,94,95. Additionally, Nt-acetylation may create conditional degradation signals93,111,112. The different functions of Nt-acetylation can likely be causally linked for several Nt-acetylated proteins. For instance, the lack of Nt-acetylation may cause aberrant folding, hinder proper complex formation or proper membrane binding. This, in turn, may expose the non-acetylated N-terminus of the uncomplexed protein, which may be recognised by Ub E3 ligases and marked for degradation. Since the full range of molecular effects of Nt-acetylation is rarely known for each specific protein, it is often difficult to separate direct effects from indirect effects. A more comprehensive understanding of these events would be beneficial. Furthermore, identifying which Ub E3 ligases recognise which N-terminal sequences, with or without Nt-acetylation, is essential to fully comprehend the dynamics between NATs and Ub E3 ligases.
Nt-acetylation is essential for the function of many proteins, as reflected in the vital roles of NATs in physiology. NAT impairment in humans causes severe and general phenotypes for the major co-translational enzymes NatA-NatC141,142,143,144,145,147,148,149, while brain calcification or abnormal hearing and muscles are observed for the specific post-translational enzymes NatF and NatH, respectively137,150. For cases where we observe specific (rather than general) phenotypes after NAT impairment, investigating the underlying molecular mechanisms could uncover important substrates and cellular pathways, enhancing our understanding of Nt-acetylation. Increased NAT expression is associated with poor prognosis in many cancers, and developing NAT inhibitors represents a promising avenue for potential anti-cancer treatment. While selective NAT inhibitors, such as bisubstrate analogues, have been developed for some enzymes59,185,186, suitable small molecule drug-like inhibitors have yet to be developed. Overall, continued research into the regulatory mechanisms and dynamics of Nt-acetylation will be essential for enhancing our understanding of this pivotal protein modification as well as uncovering potential therapeutic targets.
References
Arnesen, T. et al. Proteomics analyses reveal the evolutionary conservation and divergence of N-terminal acetyltransferases from yeast and humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 8157–8162 (2009).
Goetze, S. et al. Identification and functional characterization of N-terminally acetylated proteins in drosophila melanogaster. PLOS Biol. 7, e1000236 (2009).
Bienvenut, W. V. et al. Comparative large scale characterization of plant versus mammal proteins reveals similar and idiosyncratic N-α-acetylation features. Mol. Cell Proteom. 11, M111.015131 (2012).
Linster, E. et al. Downregulation of N-terminal acetylation triggers ABA-mediated drought responses in Arabidopsis. Nat. Commun. 6, 7640 (2015).
Van Damme, P. et al. Expanded in vivo substrate profile of the yeast N-terminal acetyltransferase NatC. J. Biol. Chem. 299, 102824 (2023).
Aksnes, H., Ree, R. & Arnesen, T. Co-translational, post-translational, and non-catalytic roles of N-terminal acetyltransferases. Mol. Cell 73, 1097–1114 (2019).
Dinh, T. V. et al. Molecular identification and functional characterization of the first Nα-acetyltransferase in plastids by global acetylome profiling. Proteomics 15, 2426–2435 (2015).
Bienvenut, W. V. et al. Dual lysine and N-terminal acetyltransferases reveal the complexity underpinning protein acetylation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 16, e9464 (2020).
Aksnes, H. et al. An organellar Nα-acetyltransferase, naa60, acetylates cytosolic N termini of transmembrane proteins and maintains golgi integrity. Cell Rep. 10, 1362–1374 (2015).
Linster, E. et al. The Arabidopsis Nα-acetyltransferase NAA60 locates to the plasma membrane and is vital for the high salt stress response. N. Phytol. 228, 554–569 (2020).
Drazic, A. et al. NAA80 is actin’s N-terminal acetyltransferase and regulates cytoskeleton assembly and cell motility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4399–4404 (2018).
Mullen, J. R. et al. Identification and characterization of genes and mutants for an N-terminal acetyltransferase from yeast. EMBO J. 8, 2067–2075 (1989).
Arnesen, T. et al. Identification and characterization of the human ARD1-NATH protein acetyltransferase complex. Biochem. J. 386, 433–443 (2005).
Gautschi, M. et al. The yeast N(alpha)-acetyltransferase NatA is quantitatively anchored to the ribosome and interacts with nascent polypeptides. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 7403–7414 (2003).
Knorr, A. G. et al. Ribosome–NatA architecture reveals that rRNA expansion segments coordinate N-terminal acetylation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 35–39 (2019).
Klein, M., Wild, K. & Sinning, I. Multi-protein assemblies orchestrate co-translational enzymatic processing on the human ribosome. Nat. Commun. 15, 7681 (2024).
Lentzsch, A. M. et al. NAC guides a ribosomal multienzyme complex for nascent protein processing. Nature 633, 718–724 (2024).
Liszczak, G. et al. Molecular basis for N-terminal acetylation by the heterodimeric NatA complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1098–1105 (2013).
Tsunasawa, S., Stewart, J. W. & Sherman, F. Amino-terminal processing of mutant forms of yeast iso-1-cytochrome c. The specificities of methionine aminopeptidase and acetyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 5382–5391 (1985).
Frottin, F. et al. The proteomics of N-terminal methionine cleavage. Mol. Cell Proteom. 5, 2336–2349 (2006).
Heathcote, K. C. et al. N-terminal cysteine acetylation and oxidation patterns may define protein stability. Nat. Commun. 15, 5360 (2024).
Arnesen, T. et al. The chaperone-like protein HYPK acts together with NatA in cotranslational N-terminal acetylation and prevention of huntingtin aggregation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 1898–1909 (2010).
Miklánková, P. et al. HYPK promotes the activity of the Nα-acetyltransferase A complex to determine proteostasis of nonAc-X2/N-degron–containing proteins. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn6153 (2022).
Gottlieb, L. & Marmorstein, R. Structure of human NatA and its regulation by the huntingtin interacting protein HYPK. Structure 26, 925–935.e928 (2018).
Weyer, F. A. et al. Structural basis of HypK regulating N-terminal acetylation by the NatA complex. Nat. Commun. 8, 15726 (2017).
Gong, X. et al. HYPK controls stability and catalytic activity of the N-terminal acetyltransferase A in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cell Rep. 43, 113768 (2024).
Gong, X. et al. OsHYPK-mediated protein N-terminal acetylation coordinates plant development and abiotic stress responses in rice. Mol. Plant. 15, 740–754 (2022).
Singer, J. M. & Shaw, J. M. Mdm20 protein functions with Nat3 protein to acetylate Tpm1 protein and regulate tropomyosin–actin interactions in budding yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7644–7649 (2003).
Polevoda, B., Cardillo, T. S., Doyle, T. C., Bedi, G. S. & Sherman, F. Nat3p and Mdm20p are required for function of yeast NatB Nα-terminal acetyltransferase and of actin and tropomyosin. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 30686–30697 (2003).
Starheim, K. K. et al. Identification of the human Nα-acetyltransferase complex B (hNatB): a complex important for cell-cycle progression. Biochem. J. 415, 325–331 (2008).
Huber, M. et al. NatB-mediated N-terminal acetylation affects growth and biotic stress responses. Plant Physiol. 182, 792–806 (2020).
Hong, H. et al. Molecular basis of substrate specific acetylation by N-terminal acetyltransferase NatB. Structure 25, 641–649.e643 (2017).
Van Damme, P. et al. N-terminal acetylome analyses and functional insights of the N-terminal acetyltransferase NatB. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 109, 12449–12454 (2012).
Polevoda, B. & Sherman, F. NatC Nα-terminal acetyltransferase of yeast contains three subunits, Mak3p, Mak10p, and Mak31p. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 20154–20159 (2001).
Starheim, K. K. et al. Knockdown of human Nα-terminal acetyltransferase complex C leads to p53-dependent apoptosis and aberrant human Arl8b localization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 3569–3581 (2009).
Grunwald, S. et al. Divergent architecture of the heterotrimeric NatC complex explains N-terminal acetylation of cognate substrates. Nat. Commun. 11, 5506 (2020).
Deng, S. et al. Molecular role of NAA38 in thermostability and catalytic activity of the human NatC N-terminal acetyltransferase. Structure 31, 166–173.e164 (2023).
Van Damme, P. et al. A role for human N-alpha acetyltransferase 30 (Naa30) in maintaining mitochondrial integrity. Mol. Cell Proteom. 15, 3361–3372 (2016).
Varland, S. et al. N-terminal acetylation shields proteins from degradation and promotes age-dependent motility and longevity. Nat. Commun. 14, 6774 (2023).
Tercero, J. C., Dinman, J. D. & Wickner, R. B. Yeast MAK3 N-acetyltransferase recognizes the N-terminal four amino acids of the major coat protein (gag) of the L-A double-stranded RNA virus. J. Bacteriol. 175, 3192–3194 (1993).
Song, O.-K., Wang, X., Waterborg, J. H. & Sternglanz, R. An Nα-acetyltransferase responsible for acetylation of the N-terminal residues of histones H4 and H2A. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 38109–38112 (2003).
Hole, K. et al. The human N-alpha-acetyltransferase 40 (hNaa40p/hNatD) is conserved from yeast and N-Terminally acetylates histones H2A and H4. PLoS ONE 6, e24713 (2011).
Magin, R. S., Liszczak, G. & Marmorstein, R. The molecular basis for histone H4- and H2A-specific amino-terminal acetylation by NatD. Structure 23, 332–341 (2015).
Jonckheere, V. & Van Damme, P. N-terminal acetyltransferase Naa40p whereabouts put into N-terminal proteoform perspective. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 3690 (2021).
Arnesen, T. et al. Cloning and characterization of hNAT5/hSAN: An evolutionarily conserved component of the NatA protein N-α-acetyltransferase complex. Gene 371, 291–295 (2006).
Hou, F., Chu, C.-W., Kong, X., Yokomori, K. & Zou, H. The acetyltransferase activity of San stabilizes the mitotic cohesin at the centromeres in a shugoshin-independent manner. J. Cell Biol. 177, 587–597 (2007).
Van Damme, P., Hole, K., Gevaert, K. & Arnesen, T. N-terminal acetylome analysis reveals the specificity of Naa50 (Nat5) and suggests a kinetic competition between N-terminal acetyltransferases and methionine aminopeptidases. Proteomics 15, 2436–2446 (2015).
Deng, S., McTiernan, N., Wei, X., Arnesen, T. & Marmorstein, R. Molecular basis for N-terminal acetylation by human NatE and its modulation by HYPK. Nat. Commun. 11, 818 (2020).
Evjenth, R. et al. Human Naa50p (Nat5/San) displays both protein Nα- and Nϵ-acetyltransferase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 31122–31129 (2009).
Van Damme, P. et al. Proteome-derived peptide libraries allow detailed analysis of the substrate specificities of N(alpha)-acetyltransferases and point to hNaa10p as the post-translational actin N(alpha)-acetyltransferase. Mol. Cell Proteom. 10, M110.004580 (2011).
Armbruster, L. et al. NAA50 is an enzymatically active N α-acetyltransferase that is crucial for development and regulation of stress responses. Plant Physiol. 183, 1502–1516 (2020).
Weidenhausen, J. et al. Structural and functional characterization of the N-terminal acetyltransferase Naa50. Structure 29, 413–425.e415 (2021).
Armbruster, L. et al. Nα-acetyltransferase NAA50 mediates plant immunity independent of the Nα-acetyltransferase A complex. Plant Physiol. 195, 3097–3118 (2024).
Deng, S. et al. Structure and mechanism of acetylation by the N-terminal dual enzyme NatA/Naa50 complex. Structure 27, 1057–1070.e1054 (2019).
Van Damme, P. et al. NatF contributes to an evolutionary shift in protein N-terminal acetylation and is important for normal chromosome segregation. PLOS Genet. 7, e1002169 (2011).
Aksnes, H. et al. Molecular determinants of the N-terminal acetyltransferase Naa60 anchoring to the Golgi membrane. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 6821–6837 (2017).
Giglione, C. & Meinnel, T. Evolution-driven versatility of N terminal acetylation in photoautotrophs. Trends Plant Sci. 26, 375–391 (2021).
Brünje, A. et al. The plastidial protein acetyltransferase GNAT1 forms a complex with GNAT2, yet their interaction is dispensable for state transitions. Mol. Cell Proteom. 23, 100850 (2024).
Goris, M. et al. Structural determinants and cellular environment define processed actin as the sole substrate of the N-terminal acetyltransferase NAA80. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4405–4410 (2018).
Wiame, E. et al. NAT6 acetylates the N-terminus of different forms of actin. FEBS J. 285, 3299–3316 (2018).
Haahr, P. et al. Actin maturation requires the ACTMAP/C19orf54 protease. Science 377, 1533–1537 (2022).
Rebowski, G. et al. Mechanism of actin N-terminal acetylation. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay8793 (2020).
Ree, R. et al. Naa80 is required for actin N-terminal acetylation and normal hearing in zebrafish. Life Sci. Alliance 7, e202402795 (2024).
Ree, R. et al. PFN2 and NAA80 cooperate to efficiently acetylate the N-terminus of actin. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 16713–16731 (2020).
Fairman, R., Shoemaker, K. R., York, E. J., Stewart, J. M. & Baldwin, R. L. Further studies of the helix dipole model: Effects of a free α-NH3+ or α-COO− group on helix stability. Proteins 5, 1–7 (1989).
Jarvis, J. A., Ryan, M. T., Hoogenraad, N. J., Craik, D. J. & Høj, P. B. Solution structure of the acetylated and noncleavable mitochondrial targeting signal of rat chaperonin 10. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1323–1331 (1995).
Greenfield, N. J., Stafford, W. E. & Hitchcock-Degregori, S. E. The effect of N-terminal acetylation on the structure of an N-terminal tropomyosin peptide and αα-tropomyosin. Protein Sci. 3, 402–410 (1994).
Holmes, W. M., Mannakee, B. K., Gutenkunst, R. N. & Serio, T. R. Loss of amino-terminal acetylation suppresses a prion phenotype by modulating global protein folding. Nat. Commun. 5, 4383 (2014).
Deng, S., Pan, B., Gottlieb, L., Petersson, E. J. & Marmorstein, R. Molecular basis for N-terminal alpha-synuclein acetylation by human NatB. eLife 9, e57491 (2020).
Bu, B. et al. N-terminal acetylation preserves α-synuclein from oligomerization by blocking intermolecular hydrogen bonds. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 8, 2145–2151 (2017).
Bell, R. et al. N-terminal acetylation of α-synuclein slows down its aggregation process and alters the morphology of the resulting aggregates. Biochemistry 61, 1743–1756 (2022).
Kang, L. et al. N-terminal acetylation of α-synuclein induces increased transient helical propensity and decreased aggregation rates in the intrinsically disordered monomer. Protein Sci. 21, 911–917 (2012).
Trexler, A. J. & Rhoades, E. N-terminal acetylation is critical for forming α-helical oligomer of α-synuclein. Protein Sci. 21, 601–605 (2012).
Aiken, C. T. et al. Phosphorylation of threonine 3: implications for huntingtin aggregation and neurotoxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 29427–29436 (2009).
Gottlieb, L., Guo, L., Shorter, J. & Marmorstein, R. N-alpha-acetylation of Huntingtin protein increases its propensity to aggregate. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 101363 (2021).
Huang, B. et al. Scalable production in human cells and biochemical characterization of full-length normal and mutant huntingtin. PLoS ONE 10, e0121055 (2015).
Greenfield, N. J., Montelione, G. T., Farid, R. S. & Hitchcock-DeGregori, S. E. The structure of the N-terminus of striated muscle α-tropomyosin in a chimeric peptide: nuclear magnetic resonance structure and circular dichroism studies. Biochemistry 37, 7834–7843 (1998).
Brown, J. H. et al. Deciphering the design of the tropomyosin molecule. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 8496–8501 (2001).
Heald, R. W. & Hitchcock-DeGregori, S. E. The structure of the amino terminus of tropomyosin is critical for binding to actin in the absence and presence of troponin. J. Biol. Chem. 263, 5254–5259 (1988).
Urbancikova, M. & Hitchcock-DeGregori, S. E. Requirement of amino-terminal modification for striated muscle alpha-tropomyosin function. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 24310–24315 (1994).
East, D. A. et al. Altering the stability of the Cdc8 overlap region modulates the ability of this tropomyosin to bind co-operatively to actin and regulate myosin. Biochem. J. 438, 265–273 (2011).
Carman, P. J., Barrie, K. R. & Dominguez, R. Novel human cell expression method reveals the role and prevalence of posttranslational modification in nonmuscle tropomyosins. J. Biol. Chem. 297, 101154 (2021).
Scott, D. C., Monda, J. K., Bennett, E. J., Harper, J. W. & Schulman, B. A. N-Terminal Acetylation Acts as an Avidity Enhancer Within an Interconnected Multiprotein Complex. Science 334, 674–678 (2011).
Monda, J. K. et al. Structural conservation of distinctive N-terminal acetylation-dependent interactions across a family of mammalian NEDD8 ligation enzymes. Structure 21, 42–53 (2013).
Yang, D. et al. Nα-acetylated Sir3 stabilizes the conformation of a nucleosome-binding loop in the BAH domain. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1116–1118 (2013).
Arnaudo, N. et al. The N-terminal acetylation of Sir3 stabilizes its binding to the nucleosome core particle. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1119–1121 (2013).
Guzman, U. H. et al. Loss of N-terminal acetyltransferase A activity induces thermally unstable ribosomal proteins and increases their turnover in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Commun. 14, 4517 (2023).
Pesaresi, P. et al. Cytoplasmic N-terminal protein acetylation is required for efficient photosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 15, 1817–1832 (2003).
Hofmann, I. & Munro, S. An N-terminally acetylated Arf-like GTPase is localised to lysosomes and affects their motility. J. Cell Sci. 119, 1494–1503 (2006).
Behnia, R., Panic, B., Whyte, J. R. & Munro, S. Targeting of the Arf-like GTPase Arl3p to the Golgi requires N-terminal acetylation and the membrane protein Sys1p. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 405–413 (2004).
Setty, S. R. G., Strochlic, T. I., Tong, A. H. Y., Boone, C. & Burd, C. G. Golgi targeting of ARF-like GTPase Arl3p requires its Nα-acetylation and the integral membrane protein Sys1p. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 414–419 (2004).
Bachmair, A., Finley, D. & Varshavsky, A. In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science 234, 179–186 (1986).
Varshavsky, A. N-degron pathways. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2408697121 (2024).
Mueller, F. et al. Overlap of NatA and IAP substrates implicates N-terminal acetylation in protein stabilization. Sci. Adv. 7, eabc8590 (2021).
Linster, E. et al. Cotranslational N-degron masking by acetylation promotes proteome stability in plants. Nat. Commun. 13, 810 (2022).
Timms, R. T. et al. A glycine-specific N-degron pathway mediates the quality control of protein N-myristoylation. Science 365, eaaw4912 (2019).
Li, Y. et al. CRL2ZER1/ZYG11B recognizes small N-terminal residues for degradation. Nat. Commun. 13, 7636 (2022).
Yan, X. et al. Molecular basis for recognition of Gly/N-degrons by CRL2ZYG11B and CRL2ZER1. Mol. Cell 81, 3262–3274.e3263 (2021).
Arnesen, T., Kjosås, I. & McTiernan, N. Protein N-terminal acetylation is entering the degradation end game. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 335–336 (2024).
Tasaki, T. et al. A family of mammalian E3 ubiquitin ligases that contain the UBR box motif and recognize N-degrons. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 7120–7136 (2005).
Hong, J. H. et al. KCMF1 (potassium channel modulatory factor 1) Links RAD6 to UBR4 (ubiquitin N-recognin domain-containing E3 ligase 4) and Lysosome-Mediated Degradation. Mol. Cell Proteom. 14, 674–685 (2015).
Masson, N. et al. Conserved N-terminal cysteine dioxygenases transduce responses to hypoxia in animals and plants. Science 365, 65–69 (2019).
Licausi, F. et al. Oxygen sensing in plants is mediated by an N-end rule pathway for protein destabilization. Nature 479, 419–422 (2011).
Gibbs, D. J. et al. Homeostatic response to hypoxia is regulated by the N-end rule pathway in plants. Nature 479, 415–418 (2011).
Weits, D. A. et al. Plant cysteine oxidases control the oxygen-dependent branch of the N-end-rule pathway. Nat. Commun. 5, 3425 (2014).
White, M. D. et al. Plant cysteine oxidases are dioxygenases that directly enable arginyl transferase-catalysed arginylation of N-end rule targets. Nat. Commun. 8, 14690 (2017).
François, C. M., Pihl, T., Dunoyer de Segonzac, M., Hérault, C. & Hudry, B. Metabolic regulation of proteome stability via N-terminal acetylation controls male germline stem cell differentiation and reproduction. Nat. Commun. 14, 6737 (2023).
Kumar, S. S. et al. Sequential CRISPR screening reveals partial NatB inhibition as a strategy to mitigate alpha-synuclein levels in human neurons. Sci. Adv. 10, eadj4767 (2024).
Guedes, J. P. et al. NatB protects procaspase-8 from UBR4-mediated degradation and is required for full induction of the extrinsic apoptosis pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 44, 358–371 (2024).
Friedrich, U. A. et al. Nα-terminal acetylation of proteins by NatA and NatB serves distinct physiological roles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Rep. 34, 108711 (2021).
Shemorry, A., Hwang, C.-S. & Varshavsky, A. Control of protein quality and stoichiometries by N-terminal acetylation and the N-end rule pathway. Mol. Cell 50, 540–551 (2013).
Hwang, C.-S., Shemorry, A. & Varshavsky, A. N-terminal acetylation of cellular proteins creates specific degradation signals. Science 327, 973–977 (2010).
Park, S.-E. et al. Control of mammalian G protein signaling by N-terminal acetylation and the N-end rule pathway. Science 347, 1249–1252 (2015).
Yang, J., Kim, S.-Y. & Hwang, C.-S. Delineation of the substrate recognition domain of MARCHF6 E3 ubiquitin ligase in the Ac/N-degron pathway and its regulatory role in ferroptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 300, 107731 (2024).
Kats, I. et al. Up-regulation of ubiquitin–proteasome activity upon loss of NatA-dependent N-terminal acetylation. Life Sci. Alliance 5, e202000730 (2022).
Ree, R. et al. The N-terminal acetyltransferase Naa10 is essential for zebrafish development. Biosci. Rep. 35, e00249 (2015).
Lee, C.-C. et al. The role of N-α-acetyltransferase 10 protein in DNA methylation and genomic imprinting. Mol. Cell 68, 89–103.e107 (2017).
Kweon, H. Y. et al. Naa12 compensates for Naa10 in mice in the amino-terminal acetylation pathway. eLife 10, e65952 (2021).
Feng, J. et al. Protein N-terminal acetylation is required for embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 4779–4789 (2016).
Chen, H. et al. Nα-acetyltransferases 10 and 15 are required for the correct initiation of endosperm cellularization in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. Physiol. 59, 2113–2128 (2018).
Ferrández-Ayela, A. et al. Mutation of an Arabidopsis NatB N-alpha-terminal acetylation complex component causes pleiotropic developmental defects. PLoS ONE 8, e80697 (2013).
Huber, M. et al. Disruption of the Nα-acetyltransferase NatB causes sensitivity to reductive stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 12, 799954 (2022).
Xu, F. et al. Two N-terminal acetyltransferases antagonistically regulate the stability of a nod-like receptor in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 27, 1547–1562 (2015).
Oishi, K., Yamayoshi, S., Kozuka-Hata, H., Oyama, M. & Kawaoka, Y. N-terminal acetylation by NatB is required for the shutoff activity of influenza A virus PA-X. Cell Rep. 24, 851–860 (2018).
Warnhoff, K. et al. The DAF-16 FOXO transcription factor regulates natc-1 to modulate stress resistance in Caenorhabditis elegans, linking insulin/IGF-1 signaling to protein N-terminal acetylation. PLOS Genet. 10, e1004703 (2014).
Malinow, R. A., Zhu, M., Jin, Y. & Kim, K. W. Forward genetic screening identifies novel roles for N-terminal acetyltransferase C and histone deacetylase in C. elegans development. Sci. Rep. 12, 16438 (2022).
Polevoda, B., Hoskins, J. & Sherman, F. Properties of Nat4, an Nα-acetyltransferase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that modifies N termini of histones H2A and H4. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 2913–2924 (2009).
Molina‐Serrano, D. et al. Loss of Nat4 and its associated histone H4 N‐terminal acetylation mediates calorie restriction‐induced longevity. EMBO Rep. 17, 1829–1843 (2016).
Constantinou, M., Klavaris, A., Koufaris, C. & Kirmizis, A. Cellular effects of NAT-mediated histone N-terminal acetylation. J. Cell Sci. 136, jcs260801 (2023).
Charidemou, E. et al. Histone acetyltransferase NAA40 modulates acetyl-CoA levels and lipid synthesis. BMC Biol. 20, 22 (2022).
Gaddelapati, S. C., George, S., Moola, A., Sengodan, K. & Palli, S. R. N(alpha)-acetyltransferase 40-mediated histone acetylation plays an important role in ecdysone regulation of metamorphosis in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. Commun. Biol. 7, 521 (2024).
Williams, B. C. et al. Two putative acetyltransferases, san and deco, are required for establishing sister chromatid cohesion in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 13, 2025–2036 (2003).
Pimenta-Marques, A. et al. Differential requirements of a mitotic acetyltransferase in somatic and germ line cells. Dev. Biol. 323, 197–206 (2008).
Feng, J. et al. The N-terminal acetyltransferase Naa50 regulates arabidopsis growth and osmotic stress response. Plant Cell Physiol. 61, 1565–1575 (2020).
Ahmed, F. & Husain, M. Human N-alpha-acetyltransferase 60 promotes influenza A virus infection by dampening the interferon alpha signaling. Front. Immunol. 12, 771792 (2022).
Beigl, T. B., Hellesvik, M., Saraste, J., Arnesen, T. & Aksnes, H. N-terminal acetylation of actin by NAA80 is essential for structural integrity of the Golgi apparatus. Exp. Cell Res. 390, 111961 (2020).
Muffels, I. J. J. et al. NAA80 bi-allelic missense variants result in high-frequency hearing loss, muscle weakness and developmental delay. Brain Commun. 3, fcab256 (2021).
Yang, H. et al. N-terminal acetyltransferase 6 facilitates enterovirus 71 replication by regulating PI4KB expression and replication organelle biogenesis. J. Virol. 98, e01749–01723 (2024).
Rope, A. F. et al. Using VAAST to identify an X-linked disorder resulting in lethality in male infants due to N-terminal acetyltransferase deficiency. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 89, 28–43 (2011).
Myklebust, L. M. et al. Biochemical and cellular analysis of Ogden syndrome reveals downstream Nt-acetylation defects. Hum. Mol. Genet. 24, 1956–1976 (2015).
Cheng, H. et al. Truncating variants in NAA15 are associated with variable levels of intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, and congenital anomalies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 102, 985–994 (2018).
Cheng, H. et al. Phenotypic and biochemical analysis of an international cohort of individuals with variants in NAA10 and NAA15. Hum. Mol. Genet. 28, 2900–2919 (2019).
Ward, T. et al. Mechanisms of congenital heart disease caused by NAA15 haploinsufficiency. Circ. Res. 128, 1156–1169 (2021).
McTiernan, N. et al. Biochemical analysis of novel NAA10 variants suggests distinct pathogenic mechanisms involving impaired protein N-terminal acetylation. Hum. Genet. 141, 1355–1369 (2022).
Lyon, G. J. et al. Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of NAA10-related neurodevelopmental syndrome and NAA15-related neurodevelopmental syndrome. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 31, 824–833 (2023).
Belbachir, N. et al. Studying long QT syndrome caused by NAA10 genetic variants using patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation 148, 1598–1601 (2023).
Morrison, J. et al. Missense NAA20 variants impairing the NatB protein N-terminal acetyltransferase cause autosomal recessive developmental delay, intellectual disability, and microcephaly. Genet. Med. 23, 2213–2218 (2021).
D’Onofrio, G. et al. Novel biallelic variants expand the phenotype of NAA20-related syndrome. Clin. Genet. 104, 371–376 (2023).
Varland, S., Brønstad, K. M., Skinner, S. J. & Arnesen, T. A nonsense variant in the N-terminal acetyltransferase NAA30 may be associated with global developmental delay and tracheal cleft. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 191, 2402–2410 (2023).
Chelban, V. et al. Biallelic NAA60 variants with impaired N-terminal acetylation capacity cause autosomal recessive primary familial brain calcifications. Nat. Commun. 15, 2269 (2024).
Ho, K.-H., Pan, K.-F., Cheng, T.-Y., Chien, M.-H. & Hua, K.-T. Multiple impacts of Naa10p on cancer progression: molecular functions and clinical prospects. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1878, 188973 (2023).
Lim, J.-H., Park, J.-W. & Chun, Y.-S. Human arrest defective 1 acetylates and activates beta-catenin, promoting lung cancer cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 66, 10677–10682 (2006).
Lee, E. J. et al. SAMHD1 acetylation enhances its deoxynucleotide triphosphohydrolase activity and promotes cancer cell proliferation. Oncotarget 8, 68517–68529 (2017).
Vo, T. T. L. et al. ARD1-mediated aurora kinase A acetylation promotes cell proliferation and migration. Oncotarget 8, 57216–57230 (2017).
Shin, D. H., Chun, Y.-S., Lee, K.-H., Shin, H.-W. & Park, J.-W. Arrest defective-1 controls tumor cell behavior by acetylating myosin light chain kinase. PLoS ONE 4, e7451 (2009).
Qian, X. et al. Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 phosphorylates Beclin1 to induce autophagy. Mol. Cell 65, 917–931.e916 (2017).
Park, Y. H., Seo, J. H., Park, J.-H., Lee, H. S. & Kim, K.-W. Hsp70 acetylation prevents caspase-dependent/independent apoptosis and autophagic cell death in cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 51, 573–578 (2017).
Shin, S. H. et al. Arrest defective 1 regulates the oxidative stress response in human cells and mice by acetylating methionine sulfoxide reductase A. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1490–e1490 (2014).
Lee, C.-F. et al. hNaa10p contributes to tumorigenesis by facilitating DNMT1-mediated tumor suppressor gene silencing. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 2920–2930 (2010).
DePaolo, J. S. et al. Acetylation of androgen receptor by ARD1 promotes dissociation from HSP90 complex and prostate tumorigenesis. Oncotarget 7, 71417–71428 (2016).
Lin, Y.-W. et al. Stabilization of ADAM9 by N-α-acetyltransferase 10 protein contributes to promoting progression of androgen-independent prostate cancer. Cell Death Dis. 11, 591 (2020).
Shim, J. H. et al. Clinical implications of arrest-defective protein 1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: a novel predictor of microvascular invasion. Dig. Dis. 30, 603–608 (2012).
Duong, N. X. et al. NAA10 gene expression is associated with mesenchymal transition, dedifferentiation, and progression of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Pathol. Res. Pract. 255, 155191 (2024).
Jiang, B. et al. Peptide mimic isolated by autoantibody reveals human arrest defective 1 overexpression is associated with poor prognosis for colon cancer patients. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 177, 1095–1103 (2010).
Yang, H. et al. microRNA-342-5p and miR-608 inhibit colon cancer tumorigenesis by targeting NAA10. Oncotarget 7, 2709–2720 (2016).
Zeng, Y. et al. High expression of Naa10p associates with lymph node metastasis and predicts favorable prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Tumor Biol. 37, 6719–6728 (2016).
Lv, S. et al. Naa10p and IKKα interaction regulates EMT in oral squamous cell carcinoma via TGF-β1/Smad pathway. J. Cell Mol. Med. 25, 6760–6772 (2021).
Zeng, Y. et al. Inhibition of STAT5a by Naa10p contributes to decreased breast cancer metastasis. Carcinogenesis 35, 2244–2253 (2014).
Arnesen, T. et al. Induction of apoptosis in human cells by RNAi-mediated knockdown of hARD1 and NATH, components of the protein N-α-acetyltransferase complex. Oncogene 25, 4350–4360 (2006).
Gromyko, D., Arnesen, T., Ryningen, A., Varhaug, J. E. & Lillehaug, J. R. Depletion of the human Nα-terminal acetyltransferase A induces p53-dependent apoptosis and p53-independent growth inhibition. Int. J. Cancer 127, 2777–2789 (2010).
Ametzazurra, A., Larrea, E., Civeira, M. P., Prieto, J. & Aldabe, R. Implication of human N-α-acetyltransferase 5 in cellular proliferation and carcinogenesis. Oncogene 27, 7296–7306 (2008).
Neri, L. et al. NatB-mediated protein N-α-terminal acetylation is a potential therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 8, 40967–40981 (2017).
Jung, T.-Y. et al. Naa20, the catalytic subunit of NatB complex, contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating the LKB1–AMPK–mTOR axis. Exp. Mol. Med. 52, 1831–1844 (2020).
Qiao, L., Dong, C., Jia, W. & Ma, B. NAA20 recruits Rin2 and promotes triple-negative breast cancer progression by regulating Rab5A-mediated activation of EGFR signaling. Cell Signal. 112, 110922 (2023).
Xu, J. et al. Knockdown of NAA25 suppresses breast cancer progression by regulating apoptosis and cell cycle. Front. Oncol. 11, 755267 (2022).
Mughal, A. A. et al. Knockdown of NAT12/NAA30 reduces tumorigenic features of glioblastoma-initiating cells. Mol. Cancer 14, 160 (2015).
Xing, M. et al. NatD epigenetically activates FOXA2 expression to promote breast cancer progression by facilitating MMP14 expression. iScience 27, 108840 (2024).
Ju, J. et al. NatD promotes lung cancer progression by preventing histone H4 serine phosphorylation to activate Slug expression. Nat. Commun. 8, 928 (2017).
Koufaris, C. & Kirmizis, A. Identification of NAA40 as a potential prognostic marker for aggressive liver cancer subtypes. Front. Oncol. 11, 691950 (2021).
Demetriadou, C. et al. NAA40 contributes to colorectal cancer growth by controlling PRMT5 expression. Cell Death Dis. 10, 236 (2019).
Demetriadou, C. et al. Histone N-terminal acetyltransferase NAA40 links one-carbon metabolism to chemoresistance. Oncogene 41, 571–585 (2022).
Fang, T., Wang, D., Li, R., Yu, W. & Tian, H. Pan-cancer analysis reveals NAA50 as a cancer prognosis and immune infiltration-related biomarker. Front. Genet. 13, 1035337 (2022).
Bell, R. et al. Effects of N-terminal acetylation on the aggregation of disease-related α-synuclein variants. J. Mol. Biol. 435, 167825 (2023).
Vinueza-Gavilanes, R. et al. N-terminal acetylation mutants affect alpha-synuclein stability, protein levels and neuronal toxicity. Neurobiol. Dis. 137, 104781 (2020).
Foyn, H. et al. Design, synthesis, and kinetic characterization of protein N-terminal acetyltransferase inhibitors. ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 1121–1127 (2013).
Deng, Y. et al. Novel bisubstrate inhibitors for protein N-terminal acetyltransferase D. J. Med. Chem. 64, 8263–8271 (2021).
Arnesen, T., Aksnes, H. & Giglione, C. Protein Termini 2022: central roles of protein ends. Trends Biochem. Sci. 48, 495–499 (2023).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funding from the Research Council of Norway (RCN) (FRIPRO Grants 324195 and 325142 to T.A.), and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program (Grant 772039 to T.A.). The authors thank the International Society of Protein Termini (ISPT) for support and useful discussions187. Figures were partly generated using images from Servier Medical Art, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
N.M., I.K. and T.A. wrote and revised the manuscript. N.M. and I.K. created the figures.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Ronen Marmorstein and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
McTiernan, N., Kjosås, I. & Arnesen, T. Illuminating the impact of N-terminal acetylation: from protein to physiology. Nat Commun 16, 703 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-55960-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-55960-5
This article is cited by
-
CUL4A-DDB1-DCAF10 is an N-recognin for N-terminally acetylated Src kinases
Nature Communications (2026)
-
Decoding a novel non-enzymatic protein acetylation mechanism in sperm that is essential for fertilizing potential
Biological Research (2025)
-
H2A.X N-terminal acetylation is a newly identified NAA40-mediated modification that is responsive to UV irradiation
Epigenetics & Chromatin (2025)








