Abstract
High-resolution nanopore analysis technology relies on the design of novel transmembrane protein platforms. Traditional barrel-shaped protein channels are preferred for constructing nanopore sensors, which may miss protein candidates in non-barrel structures. Here, we demonstrate the globular ferritin displays excellent membrane-insertion capacity and stable transmembrane ionic current owing to its hydrophobic four-fold channels and hydrophilic three-fold channels. The ionic current rectification and voltage-gating characteristics are discovered in single-ferritin ionic current measurement. Notably, the ferritin is used as a nanopore sensor, by which we achieve the high resolution discrimination of L-cysteine, L-homocysteine, and cysteine-containing dipeptides with the assistance of equivalent Cu2+. The mechanistic studies by multiple controlled experiments and quantum mechanics/all-atom/coarse-grained multiscale MD simulations reveal that analytes are synergistically captured by His114, Cys126, and Glu130 within C3 channel, causing the current blockage signals. The promising ferritin nanopore sensor provides a guide to discovering new protein nanopores without shape restrictions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Nanopore sensing based on transmembrane proteins has exhibited great potential in the field of label-free and highly sensitive single-molecule detection1,2,3,4,5. Conventional protein nanopores such as α-HL, MspA, and aerolysin have made great progress in DNA and protein sequencing6,7,8, amino acid recognition9,10, biomarker detection11,12,13,14,15, and single-molecule interactions study16,17,18,19. The development of new biological pores is considered a crucial means to enhance the resolution and expand the detection range of analytes. The membrane-insertion capacity (surface hydrophobicity) and ionic transport property (inside hydrophilicity) are two important indicators to evaluate whether a channel structure is suitable for constructing a nanopore sensor. Under this principle, some novel barrel-shaped nanopores including α-helical peptide pores20,21,22, β-barrel nanopores23,24, and DNA-based nanopores25,26,27 were designed and constructed. Usually, to enhance the hydrophobicity, the de novo pore design necessitates complex chemistry involving unnatural residues or tags incorporation. In a traditional perspective, the barrel structured channel with hydrophobic surface and hydrophilic inwall28,29 is preferred in the development of novel nanopores. However, natural proteins with non-barrel shape but possess promising membrane-insertion capacity and ionic transport properties remain largely unexplored.
Ferritin is a globular protein composed of 24 subunits with the function of storing and releasing iron to maintain the iron balance in living organisms30,31,32,33. To our best knowledge, the ferritin, with large size and globular configuration, was never reported to be inserted into the lipid bilayer and function as a transmembrane channel, let alone for single-molecule sensing. However, viewing from membrane-insertion capacity, the hydrophobic sites including six four-fold (C4) channels on the surface of ferritin could provide the attachment points for phospholipid molecules. On the other hand, ferritin has eight hydrophilic three-fold (C3) channels with narrow aperture (3-5 Å), which are considered as the natural ion channels for iron transport34,35, also providing the confined space for potential single-molecule sensing. Besides, there are three natural cysteine residues inside C3 channel34, which provide the possible reactive sites for single-molecule interaction, avoiding the complicated protein mutation during nanopore engineering. Thereby, we consider ferritin as an excellent candidate for a transmembrane protein to build a novel high-resolution nanopore sensor.
Here, we successfully insert single horse spleen ferritin into the planar lipid bilayer, constructing the ferritin-based transmembrane nanopore. The multiple insertion experiments and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation are used to confirm the establishment of a single-ferritin transmembrane system and evaluate the stability of the ferritin-lipid bilayer system, respectively, which indicates the ferritin is able to be individually and stably embedded in the lipid bilayer. The asymmetric I-V curves and voltage-dependent channel opening and closing behavior are discovered, revealing the ionic current rectification and voltage-gating characteristics of the ferritin nanopore. Furthermore, the ferritin nanopore is developed as a single-molecule sensor for amino acid and peptide detection with the assistance of Cu2+. The detection mechanism is also explored by combining controlled nanopore experiments and multiscale MD simulations. The Cu2+ is demonstrated to bridge analytes and residues (Cys126 and Glu130) inside the ferritin C3 channel, leading to the blockage current signals. The globular ferritin nanopore confirms that a high-resolution nanopore sensor could be constructed by non-barrel protein which greatly expands the protein candidates as nanopore sensors.
Results and discussion
Electrical properties and MD simulation of ferritin nanopore on the lipid bilayer
The horse spleen ferritin is assembled by 24 identical subunits, resulting in a polyhedron-like globular structure with a size of ~10 nm, as demonstrated in the previous works32,36,37. There are eight hydrophilic C3 channels on the vertex of ferritin and six hydrophobic C4 channels on the face center of ferritin (Fig. 1a, b). Specifically, the C3 channel is comprised of three subunits, in which three-fold Cys126, Asp127, and Glu130 residues enable a pore with the size of 3-5 Å (Fig. 1a). The C3 channel is considered as the specific channel through which ferritin absorbs and releases Fe2+. In detail, the Cys126 residue near the external entrance of C3 channel is reported to play a key role in absorbing Fe2+ 34. The C3 ionic channel makes it possible to construct a ferritin nanopore with stable ionic current. To be noted that the ferritin sample used in nanopore experiments (Sigma-Aldrich) is comprehensively characterized by SEC, SDS-PAGE, Native-PAGE, DLS, and HRTEM experiments and identified as intact L-rich ferritin with spherical structure (Supplementary Fig. 1). For convenience, the “ferritin” was used to represent the L-rich horse spleen ferritin in this work.
a, b Hydrophilic C3 channel (blue) and hydrophobic C4 channel (orange) of ferritin (grey). The C3 channel with the size of 3–5 Å is surrounded by three-folds of Cys126, Asp127, and Glu130, which plays the key role in ion transport. c Cartoon models of inserting ferritin nanopore into the lipid bilayer. d Electrical recording of ferritin nanopore showing voltage-dependent channel opening and closing. e I − V curve obtained from a single ferritin nanopore with nine independent experiments. The centre and error bar represent mean value and standard deviation (SD), respectively. f Histogram and Gaussian fitting of channel conductance obtained from 53 independent single-ferritin recordings at +40 mV. g The multiscale model of ferritin-lipid bilayer system before (left) and after (right) MD equilibrium. The fatty tails and the head group of 1,2-diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPhPC) are colored yellow and red, respectively. Water molecules are marked green. h Relative displacement along three directions between the mass center of ferritin and all phospholipid molecules.
The ferritin nanopore sensing apparatus is prepared by inserting one ferritin molecule into the planar lipid bilayer, where four C4 channels are embedded in the lipid bilayer, and eight C3 channels are distributed on both sides of the membrane, with four on each side. (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 2). The abrupt current increasing shown in Supplementary Fig. 3 indicates the successful construction of ferritin nanopore. The consistent pore-forming currents in three independent nanopore insertion experiments demonstrate the reliability of the ferritin nanopore (Supplementary Fig. 4). After that, the electrical properties of the ferritin nanopore are characterized. The voltage-gated characteristic of ferritin nanopore is discovered, which maintains the open state at a low voltage of +40 mV but starts to randomly close at a high voltage of +80 mV (Fig. 1d). To be noted that, all the electrophysiological recordings in this work, if without special illustration, are carried out at +40 mV to avoid the random opening-closing background signals, despite the background signals at higher voltage of +80 mV have insignificant interference in detecting analytes (Supplementary Fig. 16). In addition, the asymmetric I-V curve of ferritin nanopore is observed, exhibiting larger conductance at positive voltages and smaller conductance at negative voltages (Fig. 1e). Several insertion experiments exhibit the same I-V curves with a specific current of ~65 pA at +100 mV and ~-18 pA at -100 mV, revealing the uniformity of ferritin nanopore. (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 5). The further insertion of a second ferritin causes a double ionic current and keeps the specific I-V characteristic of ferritin nanopore (Supplementary Fig. 6), revealing that the special I-V curve shown as Fig. 1e means only one ferritin was inserted into the membrane. The ferritin nanopore has a mean conductance (G) of 0.497 ± 0.045 nS at +40 mV, based on the statistical analysis of n = 53 independent experiments (Fig. 1f). This conductance corresponds to ~1.25 × 108 ions per second, which is consistent with the magnitude of ion channels38. The ionic current is believed to result from ions passing through only C3 channels rather than hydrophobic C4 channels, according to the reported ions transport pathway of ferritin34. The above asymmetric I-V curve, voltage-gating behavior, and high ion flux are the features of ion channels38,39,40, confirming the successful construction of a single ferritin nanopore on the lipid bilayer. It is worth noting that the L-subunit of ferritin appears to play a key role in facilitating the embedding of ferritin into lipid bilayer. In our experiments, both L-rich horse ferritin and recombinantly expressed human L-ferritin (LFn) could successfully embed into lipid bilayer, whereas recombinantly expressed human H-ferritin (HFn) consistently failed to incorporate despite multiple attempts.
To evaluate the stability of the ferritin-lipid bilayer system, the coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CG-MD) simulation41,42,43,44,45,46 is employed. (Please refer to Methods for modeling details). The initial conformation is shown on the left side of Fig. 1g. The ferritin is placed at the center of the 1,2-diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPhPC) bilayer, and the four C4 hydrophobic channels are located on the XY plane in the middle of the lipid bilayer. The system is then relaxed by the isobaric-isothermal ensemble (NPT ensemble)47,48 for 6.0 μs, with the reference temperature set to 373 K to speed up conformational changes. For the first 0.05 μs, the embedding ferritin exhibits obvious movement relative to the lipid bilayer on the Z-direction. As shown in Fig. 1h, the mass center of ferritin moves away from that of the bilayer along the Z-direction and quickly reaches equilibrium, meanwhile having almost no displacement along the X and Y axes, indicating that the ferritin can be stably embedded in the lipid bilayer. The final conformation is shown on the right side of Fig. 1g. In the simulation system, four of six hydrophobic C4 channels are always embedded in the phospholipid membrane and all eight hydrophilic C3 channels are exposed on both sides of the bilayer, directly contacting with the solution. The C3 channels exposed in the solution are considered to be the channels leading the ionic current.
Single-molecule sensing with ferritin nanopore
The dimensions of most common protein nanopores are larger than 7 Å49, while the C3 channel of ferritin has a smaller channel size (3-5 Å), which could render a higher spatial resolution. In addition, the cysteine mutation is most used in nanopore engineering to enhance the reactivity of nanopores50,51,52, while there are three native cysteines in the C3 channel, enabling ferritin nanopore a good reactivity even without mutation. Therefore, the ferritin nanopore can be developed as a single-molecule sensor with high resolution and reactivity. Both L-Cysteine (L-Cys) and L-Homocysteine (L-Hcy) are significant biothiols that are considered as biomarkers related to colorectal cancer and cardiovascular diseases53,54. However, the slight difference (only one methylene) between L-Cys and L-Hcy causes similar physical and chemical properties, leading to a difficult discrimination between them. Lu et al. successfully differentiated L-Cys and L-Hcy assisted by synthetic complex probe with mutant AeL nanopore55. Cao et al. also achieved the differentiation between them by introducing [AuCl4]- as a bridge with methionine-mutated MspA nanopore, in which the sulfur atom on methionine plays a key role56. With three reactive cysteine residues in each C3 channel, the ferritin nanopore is considered as a proper sensor for the discrimination between L-Cys and L-Hcy.
Based on as-constructed ferritin nanopore sensor, direct measurement of L-Cys (80 μM) in the KCl buffer (1 M KCl, 10 mM MOPS, pH 7.4) under +40 mV bias results in no obvious blockage events (Supplementary Fig. 7). Then, the Cu2+ is added as connector because of its capability to form Cys-Cu five-membered ring complex and bind with the Cys126 residue on the C3 channel34,57. So, we design to sense L-Cys and L-Hcy with the assistance of Cu2+. The mixture solutions of L-Cys (80 μM) and L-Hcy (80 μM) are respectively prepared in the KCl buffer with Cu2+ (80 μM). Interestingly, the homogeneous current blockage signals are observed in both L-Cys and L-Hcy mixture solutions at +40 mV (Fig. 2b, c). In detail, the L-Cys leads to smaller current blockage signals (ΔI/I0 = 0.331) with longer dwell time and the L-Hcy leads to larger current blockage signals (ΔI/I0 = 0.388) with shorter dwell time (Fig. 2d, e), in which the disparity in ΔI/I0 for them is attributed to the different sizes of thiol-Cu complexes. The Cys and Hcy events are simultaneously observed in the continuous recording, displaying the distinct discrimination (Supplementary Fig. 8). It is clear that the good resolution between L-Cys and L-Hcy is achieved by our non-engineered ferritin nanopore, although there is only a slight difference by one methylene between them. In addition, multi-level blockage signals are observed both in the detection of L-Cys and L-Hcy, which is considered as the simultaneous sensing for multiple molecules by the multi-channel ferritin sensor (Supplementary Fig. 9a). The multi-level signal of L-Cys, as an example, is analyzed, in which the quantitative relationship between the probability of multi-level signals and the Cys-Cu concentrations is described using binomial distribution model and logistic model (Supplementary Fig. 9b–d). At the same time, compared with ferritin, the apo-ferritin without internal iron core exhibits the identical sensing behavior for Cys-Cu detection, revealing that the conductive and sensing properties of ferritin nanopore are independent of the iron core loaded in ferritin, but attributed to the multi-channel structure and the suitable sensitive sites in the channels (Supplementary Fig. 10).
a Schematic of ferritin nanopore sensor. The lipid bilayer divides the flow cell into cis (grounded) and trans chambers, and the testing solution is added into the trans chamber for detection. b Current trace at +40 mV in the presence of L-Cys (80 µM) and Cu2+ (80 µM) in the trans side. c Current trace at +40 mV in the presence of L-Hcy (80 µM) and Cu2+ (80 µM) in the trans side. d, e Scatter plot and histogram showing the dwell time and ΔI/I0 of blockage signals in Cys (n = 174) and Hcy (n = 201) sensing.
In addition, to test the qualification capacity of ferritin nanopore, the qualification experiments for L-Cys are carried out. The L-Cys concentration standard curve is fitted according to the acquired event frequency from standard solutions. (Supplementary Fig. 11a) Then, the actual sample (L-cysteine capsule) is dissolved and detected in three independent nanopore experiments. According to the fitted concentration standard curve, we acquired the calculated L-cysteine weight percentage as 16.6 wt%±1.9 wt%, close to the indicated value (18 wt%), revealing the well qualification capacity of the ferritin nanopore (Supplementary Fig. 11b).
Mechanism exploration for cysteine sensing with ferritin nanopore
The key role of Cu2+ in the formation of Cys-Cu complex is explored, in which the factors of chelator, buffer, and pH are investigated. The pure Cu2+ (80 μM) is firstly tested and there is no obvious signal appearing, indicating the Cu2+ itself does not induce blockage signals (Fig. 3a). Then, the key role of Cu2+ in the sensing process is further verified by the in-situ nanopore controlled experiments. There are no homogeneous signals appearing with only L-Cys, however, after adding Cu2+, the homogeneous blockage events are observed (Fig. 3b). To be noted that, the blockage signals were gradually observed after ~160 s rather than immediate appearance. We guess that in this period, the L-Cys combines with Cu2+ forming Cys-Cu complex and causing the characteristic signals. Furthermore, after adding the excess Na4EDTA (160 μM) into the mixture to capture Cu2+, the blockage events disappear, revealing the Cu2+ is a key factor in the sensing process (Fig. 3c). The influence of buffer reagents and pH of the testing solution is also evaluated. It is clear that the events frequency decreases after only replacing the MOPS with Tris-HCl (Fig. 3d, and Supplementary Fig. 12), which is attributed to the strong binding between metal ions and Tris-HCl58, interfering with the formation of Cys-Cu complex. In addition, the dwell times of blockage signals shorten as pH decreases, which is consistent with the weaker interactions between Cu2+ and L-Cys at lower pH (Fig. 3e and Supplementary Fig. 13)59. Besides, other metal ions including Fe3+, Fe2+, Zn2+, and Ni2+ were also explored as connectors for sensing L-Cys, however, no blockage signals were observed, implying the specificity of Cu2+ in this system (Supplementary Fig. 14). All the abovementioned experiments reveal that the coordination between Cu2+ and Cys may play the key role in causing blockage events.
a Only Cu2+ (80 µM) shows no obvious blockage signals. b Current trace of Cys (80 µM) before and after the in-situ addition of Cu2+ (80 µM). c Current trace of Cys (80 µM) and Cu2+ (80 µM) before and after the in-situ addition of Na4EDTA (160 µM). d Effects of buffers on event frequency of Cys (80 µM) and Cu2+ (80 µM). The error bar comes from three different time segments. e Influence of pH on the dwell time of Cys (80 µM) and Cu2+ (80 µM). The error bar comes from three independent experiments. f–i The controlled experiments for cysteine analogues with different functional groups, showing the essential role of -SH and -NH2 on cysteine to generate blockage events. j The events frequency with the different binding ratios of Cu2+ to Cys. The error bar comes from three independent experiments. k Proposed structures of Cys-Cu and Cys-Cu-Cys complexes with the different binding ratios of Cu2+ to Cys (1:1 and 1:2). For all the bar charts in this figure, the centre and error bar represent mean value and standard deviation (SD), respectively.
To further explore the binding state of Cys-Cu complex, the quantum chemical calculation is used to screen the possible structures, including N-Cu-O, S-Cu-O, and S-Cu-N. The B3LYP-D3/6-31 g(d) method60,61 and XYGJOS/def2-TZVPP method62,63,64 are used to optimize conformations and calculate the relative internal energies of three structures, respectively. As a result, the S-Cu-N five-membered ring binding state is considered as the most stable state for Cys-Cu complex due to its lowest relative internal energy (Supplementary Table 2). In addition, the nanopore controlled experiments are also performed for cysteine analogues, including 3-Mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA), L-Methionine (L-Met), and L-Serine (L-Ser), which contain only one different functional group comparing to L-Cys or L-Hcy (Fig. 3f-i). As a result, no obvious blockage signals under the same testing conditions were observed for three counterparts, confirming that the synergistic binding of amino (-NH2) and sulfhydryl (-SH) with Cu2+ plays a key role in the formation of S-Cu-N structure to generate characteristic blockage signals. It is worth noting that Cu²⁺ has previously been reported as connectors to help detect amino acids in nanopore methods, where amino acids are thought to bind to Cu2+ via their amino and carboxyl groups9,65. For example, Zhang et al. utilized MspA nanopore to detect 20 amino acids with the aid of Cu2+ 9. However, the ferritin C3 channel is smaller than the MspA nanopore, leading to a stronger electric field at the entrance. Thus, only the form of most stable S-Cu-N rather than N-Cu-O strongly remains in the channel and generates signals. The sulfhydryl group on analytes is necessary for nanopore sensing with the ferritin nanopore. It is reported that the Cu2+ is able to bind one or two cysteine molecules to form different Cys-Cu complexes (Cys-Cu and Cys-Cu-Cys)57,66. To explore the influence of the binding ratio of Cu2+ to Cys, the solutions with different ratios of Cu2+ to Cys (1:0.5, 1:1, 1:1.5, and 1:2) are prepared and tested (Fig. 3j and Supplementary Fig. 15). To be noted that the concentration of Cu2+ is fixed at 80 µM, while the concentrations of Cys are set at 40, 80, 120, and 160 µM, corresponding to the ratios of 1:0.5, 1:1, 1:1.5, and 1:2, respectively. When the ratio of Cu2+ to Cys is 1:0.5, the events frequency is calculated to ~265 events per 5 min. After increasing the concentration of L-Cys to the ratio of 1:1, the events frequency improves to ~404 per 5 min. However, with the continued increase of L-Cys, the events frequency starts to decrease and the events are hardly observed with a frequency of ~35 per 5 min in the ratio of 1:2 for Cu2+ to L-Cys. According to the experimental results, we speculate that the Cu2+ binding with only one cysteine has remaining coordination sites to bind with the residues in the ferritin C3 channel causing the blockage signals, however, the Cu2+ chelated by two cysteines has no other coordination sites to interacts with residues in C3 channel resulting in no signals generation (Fig. 3k).
To further explore how the Cys-Cu complex binds with the ferritin C3 channel, a long-time (1 ns) quantum mechanics (QM)/all-atom (AA)/ coarse-grained (CG) MD simulation is carried out. The multiscale model is first constructed. The Cu2+, its coordinated residues, and active water molecules are represented by the level of QM with the GFN2-xTB semiempirical method67,68. Residues and water molecules near the QM region are defined as the AA region. Other residues and solvents far from the QM region are defined as CG regions. Figure 4a and 4b show the schematic and structural representations of the multiscale model. (Please refer to Methods for more modeling details). To evaluate the reasonability of our multiscale model, the interaction between single Cu2+ and residues in the C3 channel is simulated and compared to that in the crystal structure 3RE734,69. The observed coordination pattern of Cu2+ with His114, Cys126, and Glu130 in the simulation is similar to that in the crystal structure, confirming the reasonability of our multiscale model (Supplementary Fig. 17).
a A schematic diagram of the CG division map for different regions. Cys-Cu-Ferritin (Prot) is represented by three scales, QM, AA, and CG. Water solvents (Wat) are represented by two scales, AA and CG. Position restrictions (PR) are adopted for molecules near interfaces to prevent diffusion. b The initial conformation of the active and non-active region in the Cys-Cu-Ferritin. The active region corresponds to the AA & QM regions in a represented by the cyan cartoon (protein) and AA water molecules. Non-active CG regions are depicted using white surfaces (protein) and green dots (solvents), respectively. c The initial conformation of the QM region represented by Cu2+, L-Cys, His114, Cys126, and Glu130 and two nearby water molecules. d The root mean square deviation (RMSD) of Cu2+ and five coordinated atoms from residues with respect to the simulation time. Primary coordination patterns of corresponding RMSD are given above, with hydrogen bonds represented by doted lines. e, f The side view showing the shape of the ion transferring pore before and after Cys-Cu attached to the C3 channel. g The estimated radius of the channel before and after bonding Cys-Cu complex with respect to the reaction coordinate of ion flow. The reaction coordinate indicates the position of the ion flow within the C3 channel, with larger values corresponding to locations nearer to the exterior of the ferritin.
Then, the binding state of Cys-Cu complex in C3 channel is explored with QM/AA/CG multiscale MD simulation. First, the Cys-Cu complex is docked into the protein channel in a manner similar to the Cu(II) coordination in the crystal structure 3RE7. Cu(II) adopts a square pyramidal coordination mode, with two sulfur atoms in a trans position to reduce steric hindrance, the coordination pattern is shown in Fig. 4c. Afterwards, the Cys-Cu-Ferritin complex is solvated and coarse-grained to the QM/AA/CG multiscale system. The MD simulation is carried out for 1 ns to evaluate the stability of the coordination. The coordination pattern of the Cys-Cu-ferritin complex undergoes two major transitions (step I to II and step II to III) during the simulation, as shown in Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 18. The coordination between -SH on Cys126 and Cu(II) always remains stable and the two oxygen atoms from -COOH on Glu130 alternately bind to the Cu(II), indicating both the Cys126 and Glu130 on the channel have stable interaction with Cu(II). As for the L-Cys, its -SH keeps stable interaction with Cu(II) but the -NH2 gradually moves away from Cu(II) and forms a stable hydrogen bond with the imidazole group on His114. In this way, the Cys-Cu complex is captured and stabilized in the C3 channel with multiple interactions from residues of His114, Cys126, and Glu130. To further verify the key roles of these residues, we introduce excess Zn2+, that also has stronger interaction with these residues34, in the detection for Cys-Cu complex to occupy these binding sites and analyze how the Cys-Cu events frequency becomes before and after introducing Zn2+. The MD simulation was first conducted to further confirm the coordination style of Zn2+ in C3 channel, in which, the Zn2+ was observed to indeed bind with these three residues and keep stable (Supplementary Fig. 19a, b). Furthermore, the concentration control experiments for Zn2+ were conducted, and it was found that the frequency of Cys-Cu events gradually decreased as the Zn2+ concentration increased, accordingly revealing the key roles of these residues (His114, Cys126, and Glu130) in binding with Cys-Cu complex (Supplementary Fig. 19c). In addition, the C3 channel radiuses before and after bonding Cys-Cu complex are calculated by MolAICal software70 (Fig. 4e–g). After bonding Cys-Cu complex, the channel radius at the narrowest point shows an obvious reduction, which causes the smaller ionic current, indicating the Cys-Cu complex is the key analyte in causing current blockage signals. Combining with the above controlled nanopore experiments and MD simulations, we result that the -NH2 and -SH of L-Cys play a key synergistic effect in chelating Cu2+ to form Cys-Cu complex. The Cys-Cu complex will enter into the ferritin C3 channel and then bind with His114, Cys126, and Glu130, causing the blockage events.
Dipeptides sensing with ferritin nanopore
To further explore the sensing applications, we attempt to detect cysteine-containing dipeptides with the ferritin nanopore. Five dipeptides including Cys-Phe (CF), Cys-Arg (CR), Cys-Lys (CK), Cys-Asp (CD), Cys-Glu (CE) are detected and we find that CF, CR and CK display homogeneous blockage signals while CD and CE cause no signals (Fig. 5a–d and Supplementary Fig. 20). Negatively charged molecules, as reported by Yang et al., are hard to enter the cavity of ferritin via negatively charged C3 channel due to electrostatic repulsion71, which can explain why the negatively charged CD and CE cause no signals (Supplementary Fig. 21). The signal statistics reveal that all CF, CR, and CK have larger volumes but smaller blockage fractions than L-Cys (Fig. 5e, f). As reported, all the charge, polarity and size of analytes can influence the current blockage fraction in nanopore analysis6,9,10. In our experiments, the blockage fractions of CK, CR, and CF are all smaller than that of L-Cys, with CF having the smallest ΔI/I0, and the difference between CK and CR is minimal (Fig. 5e, f). It is understood that the smaller L-Cys is able to enter into the deeper site of the channel causing larger blockage fraction, while the dipeptides have too large volumes to enter deeper, causing smaller blockage fractions. The CF has the strongest hydrophobicity and largest volume in all of them displaying the smallest blockage fraction. Given that lysine (K) and arginine (R) are hydrophilic polar amino acids, CK and CR are more likely to penetrate deeper into the C3 channel compared to CF, resulting in larger blockage fractions than CF. The charge interaction is believed to dominate in such a strongly negatively charged C3 channel, making it difficult to distinguish between the similarly positively charged CK and CR despite their difference in volume. To decrease the charge interaction between CR/CK and C3 channel, we improve ionic strength by using higher concentration KCl buffer (2 M KCl) in nanopore experiments (Supplementary Fig. 22). In this condition, the blockage fraction is dominated by the volume exclusion effect, which leads to a larger ΔI/I0 for larger CR.
a Structures of CR, CK, and CF dipeptides. b–d Current traces at +40 mV of CR (80 µM), CK (80 µM), and CF (80 µM) in the presence of Cu2+ (80 µM), respectively. e, f Scatter plot and histogram showing the dwell time and ΔI/I0 of blockage signals in dipeptides detection. The signals of cysteine are also displayed for comparison. n = 174, 214, 238, and 251 for Cys, CR, CK, and CF, respectively.
In summary, we have constructed a new type of nanopore with ferritin by inserting it into the lipid bilayer membrane. The ionic current recordings and multiscale MD simulations reveal that the ferritin can be embedded into the lipid bilayer and stably maintained, in which the presence of multiple C4 hydrophobic channels plays a crucial role in stabilizing the ferritin. The asymmetric I-V curves and channel opening/closing behavior under high voltage were discovered in single-ferritin electrophysiological recordings, revealing the ionic current rectification and voltage-gating characteristics of the ferritin nanopore. We then use the ferritin as a novel nanopore sensor to achieve the detection and differentiation of L-Cys, L-Hcy, and cysteine-containing dipeptides with the assistance of Cu2+, which demonstrates the high resolution of ferritin nanopore. The detection mechanism was also explored by combining the nanopore experiments and MD simulation using cysteine as an example. The cysteine combines with Cu2+ to form Cys-Cu complex and then the complex is captured by the ferritin C3 channel with multiple interactions from His114, Cys126, and Glu130, causing the current blockage signals. The ferritin nanopore provides a high resolution sensing platform for single-molecule detection. Moreover, the successful construction of the non-barrel-shaped ferritin nanopore provides a new perspective on screening and designing advanced protein nanopores.
Methods
Materials
1,2-diphytanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPhPC) was from Avanti Polar Lipids and n-decane was from Aladdin (China). Tris (hydroxymethyl)aminomethane hydrochloride (Tris-HCl), potassium chloride (KCl), and horse spleen ferritin (F4503, SLCJ8967) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (China). 2-Morpholinoethanesulphonic acid (MES), 3-Morpholinopropanesulfonic acid (MOPS), potassium hydroxide (KOH), copper chloride (CuCl2), L-cysteine (L-Cys), L-homocysteine (L-Hcy), 3-Mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA), and L-Methionine (L-Met) were from Aladdin (China). L-serine (L-Ser) was from Bidepharm (China). Hydrochloric acid (HCl) and ethanol (C2H5OH) were from Sinopharm (China). All the dipeptides were obtained from Sangon (Shanghai). All solutions in nanopore experiments were prepared with Wahaha pure water. The CuCl2, L-Cys, L-Hcy, L-Ser, L-Met, 3-MPA, and all the dipeptides were respectively dispersed into Wahaha pure water to prepare the stock solutions in 8 mM. Those stock solutions would mix with KCl buffer (pH 7.4, 1 M KCl, 10 mM MOPS) and be diluted into proper concentration for nanopore experiments. The ferritin solution was prepared by pipetting 5 μL ferritin sample (65 mg/mL) into 1 mL KCl buffer.
Preparation of ferritin nanopore sensing apparatus
1 mg DPhPC is dispersed into 100 μL n-decane to make the membrane-forming solution (10 mg/mL). 1 μL lipid solution is pipetted onto the hole of the Delrin perfusion cup (Warner Instruments, cat. no. 64-0423) for 15 min to naturally vaporize the n-decane. After that, the cup is assembled as a flow cell and 1 mL electrolyte solution is pipetted into each chamber of the flow cell. 1 μL lipid solution is pipetted into the cis chamber and the solution interface is constantly lowered and raised by taking and releasing the solution with a pipette to form the lipid bilayer on the hole. A reliable lipid bilayer membrane can keep stable under +180 mV and come to a rupture over +300 mV. The ferritin solution is pipetted into the cis chamber near the lipid bilayer membrane and +180 mV bias is applied to promote the insertion of ferritin molecule. A current change from 0 to about 150 pA implies the successful insertion of a single ferritin and then the bias is reset to +40 mV for nanopore experiments.
Data acquiring and analysis
All the single-molecule signals are acquired with an Axopatch 200B patch clamp amplifier and an Axon Digidata 1550B digitizer (Molecule Device, USA). All the signals are recorded with 100 kHz sampling rate and filtered through a 1 kHz lowpass Bessel filter. Unless otherwise noted, all electric recordings are carried out with +40 mV at room temperature (25 oC) and 80 μM Cu2+ is present in trans chamber for all the nanopore experiments to assist the detection of thiol-based analytes. All events are searched with the “single channel search” method built in the Clampfit 11.1. All the scatter plots, histograms and curve fitting are generated with Origin 2016.
Coarse-grained and multiscale MD simulation
-
(1).
AA and CG models for residues, lipid bilayer, ligands and solvents. The all-atom (AA) and coarse-grained (CG) models of small molecules and residues are modeled in a general way and subsequently used to construct complex systems. The AA residues, ligands (including Cu2+ and L-Cys), and solvents are represented by AMBER-ff19ipq, GAFF (with RESP charges), and TIP3P models respectively72,73,74,75. The CG residues and lipids are constructed systematically from bottom-up coarse-graining approaches. The CG division (not forcefields) of residues and lipids are defined the same as the MARTINI model and the united-atom model76. Their non-bonded interactions, which include Lennard-Jones (LJ) interactions and Coulomb interactions, are parameterized consistently based on the Lennard-Jones Static Potential Matching (LJSPM) and the AA member charge summation46,77. The bonded interactions are written in an AMBER-liked potential energy function74,75, but parameterized in a hybrid approach, where the inter-residue and inter-lipid parameters are deduced based on the direct Boltzmann inversion78 and the peptide bonds of AA-CG or CG-CG residue pairs are parameterized by the structure-based approach. The CG water molecules are described by two kinds of CG particles with equal and opposite charges ( ± 0.40), and identical LJ parameters as the OW atom in TIP3P. This ionic-liquid-liked CG water can well match critical physical properties like density, diffusions.
-
(2).
Construction and MD simulation of ferritin-lipid bilayer system. The ferritin-lipid bilayer CG model is used to evaluate whether ferritin can stably exist within the lipid bilayer. The ferritin model is constructed based on the reported PDB structure (PDB: 2W0O)79 and all the residues of ferritin in this simulation system are described by the CG resolution. The system is neutralized by evenly distributing K+ ions inside and outside the ferritin cavity. The elastic network model (ENM) with a force constant of 10.0 kcal/Å2 is used to maintain the secondary conformation of backbones80. The lipid and water models are also described by the CG resolution. The lipid bilayer is composed by total 800 phospholipid molecules, 400 for the upper and 400 for the lower layer. The CG water molecules are equally distributed to the whole system (including the cavity) by density.
The MD simulation for ferritin-lipid bilayer system is carried out with Gromacs-2023.1 software81 and the simulation duration is set to 6 μs with a step of 6 fs. The charge interactions are calculated with Particle Mesh Ewald (PME) method. The temperature and pressure are respectively controlled at 373 K and 1 bar with v-rescale and c-rescale methods and the cutoff is set to 1.2 nm.
-
(3).
MD simulation of the interaction between Cu2+ and residues in ferritin C3 channel. The QM/AA/CG multiscale ferritin model is constructed to verify the combination mode of Cu2+ in the ferritin C3 channel. To correctly describe the combination mode of Cu2+, molecules (including residues and solvents) nearby Cu2+ are described by the quantum mechanics (QM) model, through which the electronic effect can be correctly taken into account. The QM region is defined as Cu2+, three possible coordinate residues (His114, Cys126, Glu130) and two active water molecules. The QM Hamiltonian is computed by the GFN2-xTB semiempirical method, which has been previously utilized to describe systems containing Cu(II)67,68.
Molecules within a cutoff range (20.0 Å for residues and 30.0 Å for water) from the QM region are all described by the AA resolution to accurately simulate short and middle range environment effects for the QM region. These are denoted as the Port-AA, Wat-AA regions. The position restraint (PR) is applied to the outer shell of the AA solvent sphere (solvents outside 25.0 Å) to ensure that they do not escape to the CG region, denoted as the region Wat-AA-PR.
Other molecules are described by the CG resolution to efficiently reproduce the long-range environment effects, including CG residues and solvents (Prot-CG, Wat-CG). PR is also applied to Wat-CG within 70.0 Å from the QM region to ensure that they do not enter into the AA or QM region. Meanwhile, ENM is used to maintain the secondary conformation of backbones. The force constant for both PR and ENM is defined as 10.0 kcal/Å2.
The MD simulation is carried by the AMBER 23, ORCA 5.0.4, and xTB software for 1 ns with the timestep of 1 fs68,82,83,84. The Lennard-Jones cutoff distance is set to 12.0 Å. The QM/MM interactions are described by the electronic embedding method with the qm_cut set to 20.0 Å. The temperature and pressure are respectively controlled at 300 K and 1 bar with the v-rescale and Berendsen method.
-
(4).
MD simulation of the interaction between Cys-Cu complex and residues in ferritin C3 channel. The modeling and the simulation details are almost identical to that of the QM/AA/CG simulation mentioned above. The only difference is that the QM region additionally includes the Cys molecule coordinated with Cu2+.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The data that support the conclusions of this study are either presented in the paper or its Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper. Source data is available for Fig. 1e–h, Fig. 2, Fig. 3d–j, Fig. 4d, g, Fig. 5 and Supplementary Fig. 1b. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The python code for binomial distribution model is available. Code files have been deposited in Figshare. Please follow the link https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28953416.v1 for download.
References
Abraham Versloot, R. C. et al. Seeing the invisibles: detection of peptide enantiomers, diastereomers, and isobaric ring formation in lanthipeptides using nanopores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 18355–18365 (2023).
Fan, P. et al. Nanopore analysis of salvianolic acids in herbal medicines. Nat. Commun. 15, 1970 (2024).
Jiang, J. et al. Protein nanopore reveals the renin–angiotensin system crosstalk with single-amino-acid resolution. Nat. Chem. 15, 578–586 (2023).
Martin-Baniandres, P. et al. Enzyme-less nanopore detection of post-translational modifications within long polypeptides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 1335–1340 (2023).
Sauciuc, A., Morozzo della Rocca, B., Tadema, M. J., Chinappi, M. & Maglia, G. Translocation of linearized full-length proteins through an engineered nanopore under opposing electrophoretic force. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1275–1281 (2024).
Zhang, Y. et al. Peptide Sequencing based on host–guest interaction-assisted nanopore sensing. Nat. Methods 21, 102–109 (2024).
Dorey, A. & Howorka, S. Nanopore DNA sequencing technologies and their applications towards single-molecule proteomics. Nat. Chem. 16, 314–334 (2024).
Brinkerhoff, H., Kang, A. S. W., Liu, J., Aksimentiev, A. & Dekker, C. Multiple rereads of single proteins at single–amino acid resolution using nanopores. Science 374, 1509–1513 (2021).
Zhang, M. et al. Real-time detection of 20 amino acids and discrimination of pathologically relevant peptides with functionalized nanopore. Nat. Methods 21, 609–618 (2024).
Wang, K. et al. Unambiguous discrimination of all 20 proteinogenic amino acids and their modifications by nanopore. Nat. Methods 21, 92–101 (2024).
Ratinho, L., Bacri, L., Thiebot, B., Cressiot, B. & Pelta, J. Identification and detection of a peptide biomarker and its enantiomer by nanopore. ACS Cent. Sci. 10, 1167–1178 (2024).
Greive, S. J., Bacri, L., Cressiot, B. & Pelta, J. Identification of conformational variants for bradykinin biomarker peptides from a biofluid using a nanopore and machine learning. ACS Nano 18, 539–550 (2024).
Liu, L. et al. Simultaneous quantification of multiple cancer biomarkers in blood samples through DNA-assisted nanopore sensing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 11882–11887 (2018).
Koch, C. et al. Nanopore sequencing of DNA-barcoded probes for highly multiplexed detection of MicroRNA, proteins and small biomarkers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 18, 1483–1491 (2023).
Huang, G., Willems, K., Soskine, M., Wloka, C. & Maglia, G. Electro-osmotic capture and ionic discrimination of peptide and protein biomarkers with FraC nanopores. Nat. Commun. 8, 935 (2017).
Luchian, T., Shin, S.-H. & Bayley, H. Single-molecule covalent chemistry with spatially separated reactants. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 42, 3766–3771 (2003).
Haugland, M. M., Borsley, S., Cairns-Gibson, D. F., Elmi, A. & Cockroft, S. L. Synthetically diversified protein nanopores: resolving click reaction mechanisms. ACS Nano 13, 4101–4110 (2019).
Liu, W. et al. Observing confined local oxygen-induced reversible thiol/disulfide cycle with a protein nanopore. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202304023 (2023).
Hao, W. et al. Single-Molecule Exchange inside a Nanocage Provides Insights into the Origin of π–π Interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 146, 10206–10216 (2024).
Scott, A. J. et al. Constructing ion channels from water-soluble α-helical barrels. Nat. Chem. 13, 643–650 (2021).
Das, A. D., K, V., S, S. D. & Mahendran, K. R. Synthetic α-helical nanopore reactor for chemical sensing. JACS Au 3, 2467–2477 (2023).
Krishnan, R. S. et al. Autonomously assembled synthetic transmembrane peptide pore. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 2949–2959 (2019).
Shimizu, K. et al. De novo Design of a Nanopore for Single-molecule Detection that Incorporates a β-Hairpin Peptide. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 67–75 (2022).
Huang, G. et al. PlyAB Nanopores detect single amino acid differences in folded haemoglobin from blood**. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202206227 (2022).
Shen, Q. et al. Functionalized DNA-origami-protein nanopores generate large transmembrane channels with programmable size-selectivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 1292–1300 (2023).
Xing, Y., Dorey, A., Jayasinghe, L. & Howorka, S. Highly shape- and size-tunable membrane nanopores made with DNA. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 708–713 (2022).
Langecker, M. et al. Synthetic lipid membrane channels formed by designed DNA nanostructures. Science 338, 932–936 (2012).
Luo, L. et al. DNA nanopores as artificial membrane channels for bioprotonics. Nat. Commun. 14, 5364 (2023).
Mahfoud, M., Sukumaran, S., Hülsmann, P., Grieger, K. & Niederweis, M. Topology of the porin MspA in the outer membrane of mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 5908–5915 (2006).
Sudarev, V. V. et al. Ferritin self-assembly, structure, function, and biotechnological applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 224, 319–343 (2023).
Liu, X. & Theil, E. C. Ferritins: dynamic management of biological iron and oxygen chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 38, 167–175 (2005).
Yousefi, A. et al. Optical monitoring of in situ iron loading into single, native ferritin proteins. Nano Lett. 23, 3251–3258 (2023).
Yousefi, A. et al. Structural flexibility and disassembly kinetics of single ferritin molecules using optical nanotweezers. ACS Nano 18, 15617–15626 (2024).
Behera, R. K. & Theil, E. C. Moving Fe2+ from ferritin ion channels to catalytic OH centers depends on conserved protein cage carboxylates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7925–7930 (2014).
Tosha, T., Ng, H.-L., Bhattasali, O., Alber, T. & Theil, E. C. Moving metal ions through ferritin−protein nanocages from three-fold pores to catalytic sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 14562–14569 (2010).
Lee, N. K., Cho, S. & Kim, I.-S. Ferritin – a multifaceted protein scaffold for biotherapeutics. Exp. Mol. Med. 54, 1652–1657 (2022).
Yin, Y.-D. et al. Solid-state nanopore distinguishes ferritin and apo-ferritin with identical exteriors through amplified flexibility at single-molecule level. Anal. Chem. 95, 16496–16504 (2023).
Doyle, D. A. et al. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science 280, 69–77 (1998).
LeMasurier, M., Heginbotham, L. & Miller, C. Kcsa: It’s a potassium channel. J. Gen. Physiol. 118, 303–314 (2001).
Catterall, W. A. Structure and function of voltage-gated sodium channels at atomic resolution. Exp. Physiol. 99, 35–51 (2014).
Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Xia, F., Cao, Z. & Xu, X. Accurate and Efficient Estimation of Lennard–Jones Interactions for Coarse-Grained Particles via a Potential Matching Method. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 4879–4890 (2022).
Bond, P. J., Holyoake, J., Ivetac, A., Khalid, S. & Sansom, M. S. P. Coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins and peptides. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 593–605 (2007).
Risselada, H. J. & Marrink, S. J. Curvature effects on lipid packing and dynamics in liposomes revealed by coarse grained molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 2056–2067 (2009).
Zhang, Y., Cao, Z., Zhang, J. Z. & Xia, F. Double-well ultra-coarse-grained model to describe protein conformational transitions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 6678–6689 (2020).
Zhang, Y., Xia, K., Cao, Z., Gräter, F. & Xia, F. A new method for the construction of coarse-grained models of large biomolecules from low-resolution cryo-electron microscopy data. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 9720–9727 (2019).
Qingdong, Z., Zhang, Y. & Fei, X. Effective volume correction for lennard-jones static potential matching on coarse-graining small molecules. ChemRxiv. 10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-gcmnn-v2 (2024).
Bernetti, M. & Bussi, G. Pressure control using stochastic cell rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 153, 114107 (2020).
Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 014101 (2007).
Crnković, A., Srnko, M. & Anderluh, G. Biological nanopores: engineering on demand. Life 11, 27–57 (2021).
Qing, Y. et al. Single-Molecule Observation of Intermediates in Bioorthogonal 2-Cyanobenzothiazole Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 15711–15716 (2020).
Liu, Y. et al. Nanopore identification of alditol epimers and their application in rapid analysis of alditol-containing drinks and healthcare products. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 13717–13728 (2022).
Wang, Y. et al. Identification of nucleoside monophosphates and their epigenetic modifications using an engineered nanopore. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 976–983 (2022).
Miller, J. W. et al. Homocysteine, Cysteine, and Risk of Incident Colorectal Cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Cohort. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 97, 827–834 (2013).
Rehman, T. et al. Cysteine and homocysteine as biomarker of various diseases. Food Sci. Nutr. 8, 4696–4707 (2020).
Lu, Y., Wu, X.-Y., Ying, Y.-L. & Long, Y.-T. Simultaneous single-molecule discrimination of cysteine and homocysteine with a protein nanopore. Chem. Commun. 55, 9311–9314 (2019).
Cao, J. et al. Giant single molecule chemistry events observed from a tetrachloroaurate(III) embedded Mycobacterium smegmatis porin A nanopore. Nat. Commun. 10, 5668 (2019).
Das, D., Roy, A., Sutradhar, S., Fantuzzi, F. & Ghosh, B. N. A Simple Copper(II) dppy-based Receptor for Sensing of L-cysteine and L-histidine in Aqueous Acetonitrile Medium. Sens. Diagn. 2, 1649–1657 (2023).
Xiao, C.-Q., Huang, Q., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H.-Q. & Lai, L. Binding thermodynamics of divalent metal ions to several biological buffers. Thermochim. Acta 691, 178721 (2020).
Badarau, A. & Dennison, C. Copper Trafficking Mechanism of CXXC-containing domains: insight from the pH-Dependence of Their Cu(I) Affinities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 2983–2988 (2011).
Zhang, I. Y., Wu, J. & Xu, X. Extending the reliability and applicability of B3LYP. Chem. Commun. 46, 3057–3070 (2010).
Zhang, Y., Wu, A., Xu, X. & Yan, Y. Geometric dependence of the B3LYP-predicted magnetic shieldings and chemical shifts. J. Phys. Chem. A 111, 9431–9437 (2007).
Zhang, I. Y. & Xu, X. XYG3 and XYGJ-OS performances for noncovalent binding energies relevant to biomolecular structures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 12554–12570 (2012).
Zhang, I. Y., Xu, X., Jung, Y. & Goddard, W. A. A Fast Doubly hybrid density functional method close to chemical accuracy using a local opposite spin ansatz. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 108, 19896–19900 (2011).
Zhang, I. Y. & Xu, X. Reaching a Uniform Accuracy for Complex Molecular Systems: Long-Range-Corrected XYG3 Doubly Hybrid Density Functional. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 1669–1675 (2013).
Boersma, A. J. & Bayley, H. Continuous Stochastic Detection of Amino Acid Enantiomers with a Protein Nanopore. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 9606–9609 (2012).
Ramek, M., Pejić, J. & Sabolović, J. Structure Prediction of Neutral Physiological Copper(II) Compounds with L-cysteine and L-histidine. J. Inorg. Biochem. 223, 111536 (2021).
Raßpe-Lange, L. et al. Geometrical Benchmarking and Analysis of Redox Potentials of Copper (I/II) Guanidine-quinoline Complexes: Comparison of Semi-empirical Tight-binding and DFT Methods and the Challenge of Describing the Entatic State. J. Comput. Chem. 44, 319–328 (2023).
Bannwarth, C., Ehlert, S. & Grimme, S. GFN2-xTB—An Accurate and Broadly Parametrized Self-Consistent Tight-Binding Quantum Chemical Method with Multipole Electrostatics and Density-Dependent Dispersion Contributions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 1652–1671 (2019).
Bertini, I. et al. Structural Insights into the Ferroxidase Site of Ferritins from Higher Eukaryotes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 6169–6176 (2012).
Bai, Q. et al. MolAICal: a soft tool for 3D drug design of protein targets by artificial intelligence and classical algorithm. Brief. Bioinf. 22, bbaa161 (2021).
Yang, X. & Chasteen, N. D. Molecular diffusion into horse spleen ferritin: a nitroxide radical spin probe study. Biophys. J. 71, 1587–1595 (1996).
Bayly, C. I., Cieplak, P., Cornell, W. & Kollman, P. A. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 10269–10280 (1993).
Price, D. J. & Brooks, C. L. III A modified TIP3P water potential for simulation with Ewald summation. J. Chem. Phys. 121, 10096–10103 (2004).
Tian, C. et al. ff19SB: Amino-acid-specific protein backbone parameters trained against quantum mechanics energy surfaces in solution. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 528–552 (2020).
Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1157–1174 (2004).
Souza, P. C. T. et al. Protein–ligand binding with the coarse-grained Martini model. Nat. Commun. 11, 3714 (2020).
Lu, D., Luo, D., Zhang, Y. & Wang, B. A Robust Induced Fit Docking Approach with the Combination of the Hybrid All-Atom/United-Atom/Coarse-Grained Model and Simulated Annealing. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 6414–6423 (2024).
Liwo, A. et al. Prediction of protein structure using a knowledge-based off-lattice united-residue force field and global optimization methods. Theor. Chem. Acc. 101, 16–20 (1999).
de Val, N., Declercq, J.-P., Lim, C. K. & Crichton, R. R. Structural analysis of haemin demetallation by L-chain apoferritins. J. Inorg. Biochem. 112, 77–84 (2012).
Park, S. W., Lee, B. H. & Kim, M. K. Elastic network model: a coarse-grained approach to the study of biomolecular dynamics. Multiscale Sci. Eng. 5, 104–118 (2023).
Hess, B. P-LINCS: A Parallel Linear Constraint Solver for Molecular Simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 116–122 (2008).
Neese, F. The ORCA program system. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2, 73–78 (2012).
Neese, F. Software update: The ORCA program system—Version 5.0. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 12, e1606 (2022).
Salomon-Ferrer, R., Case, D. A. & Walker, R. C. An overview of the Amber biomolecular simulation package. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 3, 198–210 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Jiangsu Basic Research Center for Synthetic Biology (Grant No. BK20233003, Z.-Y.G.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22174067 and 22374077, Z.-Y.G.; 22403051, Y.-W.Z.), and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (Z.-Y.G.). We thank Dr. Ling-Yu Chu and Prof. Guan-Zhu Han for their kind assistance with the SDS- and Native-PAGE experiments. We thank Prof. Ke-Long Fan for his friendly providing recombinantly expressed and purified human L-ferritin (LFn) and H-ferritin (HFn).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Z.-Y.G. conceived the idea and supervised the research. Y.-D.Y. and X.-T.S. performed the nanopore experiments and discussed the results. Y.-W.Z. and Y.-F.L. performed the MD simulation. J.H. assisted in the controlled experiments. Y.-H.C. assisted in the MD simulation. Y.-D.Y. wrote the paper. Y.-D.Y., Y.-W.Z., W.-C.L., and Z.-Y.G. discussed the experimental data and revised the paper. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Fadi Bou-Abdallah, Shuo Huang, Hai-Chen Wu, and the other, anonymous, reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yin, YD., Zhang, YW., Song, XT. et al. Native globular ferritin nanopore sensor. Nat Commun 16, 5268 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60322-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-60322-2







