Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Early detection of aberrant cell fate and repair using circulating progenitor cells in patients with heterotopic ossification
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 31 January 2026

Early detection of aberrant cell fate and repair using circulating progenitor cells in patients with heterotopic ossification

  • Johanna Nunez1,
  • Matilda Holtz2,3,
  • Sneha Korlakunta  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0008-7336-65791,
  • Hanil Kang  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0005-3681-86422,3,
  • Florence Lin2,3,
  • Hannah Stowe  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8698-01632,3,
  • Chase A. Pagani1,
  • Achira Shah1,
  • Elise C. Jeffery1,
  • Meriam Elhamad1,
  • Saeed Nazemidashtarjandi2,3,
  • Robert Tower  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-5856-57581,
  • Ji Hae Choi  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0001-1408-33831,
  • Heeseog Kang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2612-85851,
  • Alexandra Callan4,
  • Antonia F. Chen4,
  • Cenk Ayata  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3644-60425,
  • Mehmet Toner  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3647-36652,3,
  • Benjamin Levi1 &
  • …
  • N. Murat Karabacak  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2761-55932,3 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Bone
  • Lab-on-a-chip
  • Predictive markers
  • Translational research
  • Trauma

Abstract

Heterotopic ossification (HO), the abnormal formation of bone in soft tissues, is a debilitating complication that occurs after severe burns, trauma, and joint replacement surgery. Current diagnostic methods detect HO only after substantial progression, limiting opportunities for early intervention. In this study, we show that circulating mesenchymal progenitor cells (cMPCs), isolated using a microfluidic iChip from patients undergoing hip replacement and a mouse model of traumatic HO, exhibit HO-associated gene expression as early as 6 hours post-injury—41 days before radiographic detection. RNA sequencing of cMPCs enabled development of a liquid biopsy-based HO risk prediction model, achieving up to 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity in human subjects. Furthermore, the model detected significant reductions in HO risk following prophylactic treatment, correlating with decreased HO volume. These findings establish a noninvasive platform for early detection and monitoring of HO and suggest broader utility for diseases involving aberrant mesenchymal cell fate. This approach enables high-throughput screening of at-risk patients and real-time assessment of therapeutic efficacy.

Data availability

Flow cytometry data was deposited to the Flow Repository and is available under Repository ID FR-FCM-Z7CJ. RNAseq data have been deposited to GEO and is available under accession codes GSE267142, GSE267143GSE267144, and GSE316836. The previously published sequencing data [13] used in this work is available via accession number GSE126060. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Zeckey, C. et al. Risk of symptomatic heterotopic ossification following plate osteosynthesis in multiple trauma patients: an analysis in a level-1 trauma centre. Scand. J. Trauma Resusc. Emerg. Med 17, 55 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mital, M. A., Garber, J. E. & Stinson, J. T. Ectopic bone formation in children and adolescents with head injuries: its management. J. Pediatr. orthopedics 7, 83–90 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Levi, B. et al. Risk factors for the development of heterotopic ossification in seriously burned adults: a National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research burn model system database analysis. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg 79, 870–876 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nauth, A. et al. Heterotopic ossification in orthopaedic trauma. J. Orthop. Trauma 26, 684–688 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dey, D. et al. The traumatic bone: trauma-induced heterotopic ossification. Transl. Res 186, 95–111 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kluger, G., Kochs, A. & Holthausen, H. Heterotopic ossification in childhood and adolescence. J. Child Neurol. 15, 406–413 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Merkely, G., Chisari, E., Lola Rosso, C. & Lattermann, C. Do nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have a deleterious effect on cartilage repair? a systematic review. Cartilage 13, 326S–341S (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Oh, J. H. et al. Do selective COX-2 inhibitors affect pain control and healing after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A preliminary study. Am. J. Sports Med 46, 679–686 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suda, R. K. et al. Circulating osteogenic precursor cells in heterotopic bone formation. Stem Cells 27, 2209–2219 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Alm, J. J. et al. Circulating plastic adherent mesenchymal stem cells in aged hip fracture patients. J. Orthop. Res 28, 1634–1642 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eghbali-Fatourechi, G. Z. et al. Circulating osteoblast-lineage cells in humans. N. Engl. J. Med 352, 1959–1966 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sorkin, M. et al. Regulation of heterotopic ossification by monocytes in a mouse model of aberrant wound healing. Nat. Commun. 11, 722 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loder, S. J. et al. Characterizing the Circulating Cell Populations in Traumatic Heterotopic Ossification. Am. J. Pathol. 188, 2464–2473 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sullivan, J. P. et al. Brain tumor cells in circulation are enriched for mesenchymal gene expression. Cancer Discov. 4, 1299–1309 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ting, D. T. et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies extracellular matrix gene expression by pancreatic circulating tumor cells. Cell Rep. 8, 1905–1918 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miyamoto, D. T. et al. RNA-Seq of single prostate CTCs implicates noncanonical Wnt signaling in antiandrogen resistance. Science 349, 1351–1356 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fachin, F. et al. Monolithic Chip for High-throughput Blood Cell Depletion to Sort Rare Circulating Tumor Cells. Sci. Rep. 7, 10936 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kalinich, M. et al. An RNA-based signature enables high specificity detection of circulating tumor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 1123–1128 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hong, X. et al. Molecular signatures of circulating melanoma cells for monitoring early response to immune checkpoint therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2467–2472 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kwan, T. T. et al. A Digital RNA Signature of Circulating Tumor Cells Predicting Early Therapeutic Response in Localized and Metastatic Breast Cancer. Cancer Discov. 8, 1286–1299 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miyamoto, D. T. et al. An RNA-Based Digital Circulating Tumor Cell Signature Is Predictive of Drug Response and Early Dissemination in Prostate Cancer. Cancer Discov. 8, 288–303 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ozkumur, E. et al. Inertial focusing for tumor antigen-dependent and -independent sorting of rare circulating tumor cells. Sci. Transl. Med 5, 179ra47 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wong, K. H. K. et al. Whole blood stabilization for the microfluidic isolation and molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 1733 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Agarwal, S. et al. Surgical excision of heterotopic ossification leads to re-emergence of mesenchymal stem cell populations responsible for recurrence. STEM CELLS Transl. Med. 6, 799–806 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jeffery, E. C., Mann, T. L. A., Pool, J. A., Zhao, Z. & Morrison, S. J. Bone marrow and periosteal skeletal stem/progenitor cells make distinct contributions to bone maintenance and repair. Cell Stem Cell 29, 1547–1561.e6 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zhong, L. et al. Single cell transcriptomics identifies a unique adipose lineage cell population that regulates bone marrow environment. eLife 9, e54695 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Baccin, C. et al. Combined single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveal the molecular, cellular and spatial bone marrow niche organization. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 38–48 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kan, C. et al. Gli1-labeled adult mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells and hedgehog signaling contribute to endochondral heterotopic ossification. Bone 109, 71–79 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Huber, A. K. et al. Immobilization after injury alters extracellular matrix and stem cell fate. J. Clin. Invest. 130, 5444–5460 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, S. et al. NGF-TrkA signaling dictates neural ingrowth and aberrant osteochondral differentiation after soft tissue trauma. Nat. Commun. 12, 4939 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vishlaghi, N. et al. Vegfc-expressing cells form heterotopic bone after musculoskeletal injury. Cell Rep. 43, 114049 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kang, H. et al. The HIF-1α/PLOD2 axis integrates extracellular matrix organization and cell metabolism, leading to aberrant musculoskeletal repair. Bone Res. 12, 17 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Feuermann, M. et al. A compendium of human gene functions derived from evolutionary modelling. Nature 640, 146–154 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Khuman, J. et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha and Fas receptor contribute to cognitive deficits independent of cell death after concussive traumatic brain injury in mice. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 31, 778–789 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Guardiola, O. et al. Induction of acute skeletal muscle regeneration by cardiotoxin injection. J. Vis. Exp. 54515 https://doi.org/10.3791/54515 (2017).

  36. Zondervan, R. L., Vorce, M., Servadio, N. & Hankenson, K. D. Fracture apparatus design and protocol optimization for closed-stabilized fractures in rodents. J. Vis. Exp. 58186 https://doi.org/10.3791/58186 (2018).

  37. Peterson, J. R. et al. Early detection of burn-induced heterotopic ossification using transcutaneous Raman spectroscopy. Bone 54, 28–34 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Perosky, J. E. et al. Early detection of heterotopic ossification using near-infrared optical imaging reveals dynamic turnover and progression of mineralization following Achilles tenotomy and burn injury. J. Orthop. Res 32, 1416–1423 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ranganathan, K. et al. High-frequency spectral ultrasound imaging (SUSI) visualizes early post-traumatic heterotopic ossification (HO) in a mouse model. Bone 109, 49–55 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Brownley, R. C. et al. Characterization of heterotopic ossification using radiographic imaging: evidence for a paradigm shift. PloS one 10, e0141432 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Citak, M. et al. The roles of serum alkaline and bone alkaline phosphatase levels in predicting heterotopic ossification following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 54, 368–370 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lin, Y., Lin, W. Y., Kao, C. H. & Tsai, S. C. Easy interpretation of heterotopic ossification demonstrated on bone SPECT/CT. Clin. Nucl. Med 39, 62–63 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Eekhoff, E. M. W. et al. 18F]NaF PET/CT scan as an early marker of heterotopic ossification in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva. Bone 109, 143–146 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ghanem, M. A., Dannoon, S. & Elgazzar, A. H. The added value of SPECT-CT in the detection of heterotopic ossification on bone scintigraphy. Skelet. Radio. 49, 291–298 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dai, X. et al. Phosphorylation of angiomotin by Lats1/2 kinases inhibits F-actin binding, cell migration, and angiogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 34041–34051 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kwon, E. K. et al. The role of ellis-van creveld 2(EVC2) in mice during cranial bone development. Anat. Rec. (Hoboken) 301, 46–55 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Herdenberg, C. et al. LRIG proteins regulate lipid metabolism via BMP signaling and affect the risk of type 2 diabetes. Commun. Biol. 4, 90 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cao, H. et al. The Pitx2:miR-200c/141:noggin pathway regulates Bmp signaling and ameloblast differentiation. Development 140, 3348–3359 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Cui, Y. et al. Hemicentin-1 is an essential extracellular matrix component during tooth root formation by promoting mesenchymal cell differentiation. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 12, 1435241 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wischmann, J. et al. Matrix mineralization controls gene expression in osteoblastic cells. Exp. Cell Res. 372, 25–34 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Li, P. et al. Mice lacking the matrilin family of extracellular matrix proteins develop mild skeletal abnormalities and are susceptible to age-associated osteoarthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 666 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Vallet, S. D. & Ricard-Blum, S. Lysyl oxidases: from enzyme activity to extracellular matrix cross-links. Essays Biochem 63, 349–364 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Vadon-Le Goff, S. et al. Identification of PCPE-2 as the endogenous specific inhibitor of human BMP-1/tolloid-like proteinases. Nat. Commun. 14, 8020 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mukherjee, A. & Rotwein, P. Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-5 in osteogenesis: facilitator or inhibitor? Growth Horm. IGF Res 17, 179–185 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tian, B. et al. CRYAB suppresses ferroptosis and promotes osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stem cells via binding and stabilizing FTH1. Aging (Albany NY) 16, 8965–8979 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Granéli, C. et al. Novel markers of osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells identified using a quantitative proteomics approach. Stem Cell Res 12, 153–165 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bonnet, N., Conway, S. J. & Ferrari, S. L. Regulation of beta-catenin signaling and parathyroid hormone anabolic effects in bone by the matricellular protein periostin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 15048–15053 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Duchamp de Lageneste, O. et al. Periosteum contains skeletal stem cells with high bone regenerative potential controlled by Periostin. Nat. Commun. 9, 773 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chen, P. et al. Scara3 regulates bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell fate switch between osteoblasts and adipocytes by promoting Foxo1. Cell Prolif. 54, e13095 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sono, T. et al. Perivascular Fibro-Adipogenic Progenitor Tracing during Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis. Am. J. Pathol. 190, 1909–1920 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Harvey, T., Flamenco, S. & Fan, C.-M. A Tppp3+Pdgfra+ tendon stem cell population contributes to regeneration and reveals a shared role for PDGF signalling in regeneration and fibrosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 1490–1503 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Mishra, A. et al. Ultrahigh-throughput magnetic sorting of large blood volumes for epitope-agnostic isolation of circulating tumor cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 16839–16847 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Karabacak, N. M. et al. Microfluidic, marker-free isolation of circulating tumor cells from blood samples. Nat. Protoc. 9, 694–710 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hahaut, V. et al. Fast and highly sensitive full-length single-cell RNA sequencing using FLASH-seq. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1447–1451 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Uhlen, M. et al. A genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of protein-coding genes in human blood cells. Science. 366, eaax9198 (2019).

  68. Zheng, G. X. Y. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 14049 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hao, Y. et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 293–304 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Korsunsky, I. et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat. Methods 16, 1289–1296 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Severe, N. et al. Stress-induced changes in bone marrow stromal cell populations revealed through single-cell protein expression mapping. Cell Stem Cell 25, 570–583.e7 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Baryawno, N. et al. A cellular taxonomy of the bone marrow stroma in homeostasis and leukemia. Cell 177, 1915–1932.e16 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the MGH Nextgen Sequencing, MGH Flow and Mass Cytometry Cores for technical assistance with Flow Cytometry and RNA sequencing. We thank the following orthopedic surgeons at UTSW that contributed to this work: Drs. Robert Weinschenk, Varatharaj Mounasamy, Alexandra Callan, Michael Huo, Garen Collett, Ishvinder Grewal, Antonia Chen. We thank the technical assistance from Drs. Avanish Mishra, Jon Edd, Ezgi Antmen, Qin Tao, and Sweta Munagapati. This work was supported by funding from Shriners Hospital for Children, MGH ECOR, Orphan Disease Center (to N.M.K.). Dr. Levi is grateful for support from the NIH (R61AR078072/R33AR078072 and R01AR078324). We also appreciate support from Surgical Partners in Research (SPAR) at UTSW, including Jarrett Hubbard and Katie Naumann.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Organogenesis, Regeneration, and Trauma, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA

    Johanna Nunez, Sneha Korlakunta, Chase A. Pagani, Achira Shah, Elise C. Jeffery, Meriam Elhamad, Robert Tower, Ji Hae Choi, Heeseog Kang & Benjamin Levi

  2. Center for Engineering in Medicine and Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

    Matilda Holtz, Hanil Kang, Florence Lin, Hannah Stowe, Saeed Nazemidashtarjandi, Mehmet Toner & N. Murat Karabacak

  3. Shriners Children’s, Boston, MA, USA

    Matilda Holtz, Hanil Kang, Florence Lin, Hannah Stowe, Saeed Nazemidashtarjandi, Mehmet Toner & N. Murat Karabacak

  4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA

    Alexandra Callan & Antonia F. Chen

  5. Neurovascular Research Unit, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, USA

    Cenk Ayata

Authors
  1. Johanna Nunez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matilda Holtz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sneha Korlakunta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hanil Kang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Florence Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hannah Stowe
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Chase A. Pagani
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Achira Shah
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Elise C. Jeffery
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Meriam Elhamad
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Saeed Nazemidashtarjandi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Robert Tower
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ji Hae Choi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Heeseog Kang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Alexandra Callan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Antonia F. Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Cenk Ayata
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Mehmet Toner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Benjamin Levi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. N. Murat Karabacak
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.H.N. performed animal experiments; M.H. performed iChip enrichment, data analysis, machine learning; S.K. performed bioinformatic analysis; H.K., F.L., and H.S. performed iChip enrichment and RNA-seq experiments; C.P. developed experimental design and performed animal experiments; A.S. performed bioinformatic analysis; E.C.J. developed experimental design and animal experiments; M.E., A.C., and A.F.C developed clinical design and supported patient enrollment; S.N. performed flow cytometry; R.T. designed bioinformatic approach; J.C. performed animal experiments and microCT analysis, H.K. performed animal experiments; C.A. provided mouse model expertise; M.T. contributed methodology; B.L. and N.M.K. conceived the study, directed the study, contributed methodology, and coordinated the collaborative work. N.M.K. and B.L. wrote the paper. All the authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Benjamin Levi or N. Murat Karabacak.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Massachusetts General Hospital has filed a patent application for the use of rare cell isolation technology in heterotopic ossification described in this publication (PCT Application No. PCT/US2024/055005). The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Matthew Greenblatt and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Reporting Summary

Transparent Peer Review file

Source data

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nunez, J., Holtz, M., Korlakunta, S. et al. Early detection of aberrant cell fate and repair using circulating progenitor cells in patients with heterotopic ossification. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68857-8

Download citation

  • Received: 17 May 2024

  • Accepted: 19 January 2026

  • Published: 31 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-68857-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research