Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Inhibiting Mrt4-rRNA interaction with fumaramidmycin-based derivatives as an antifungal strategy
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 04 March 2026

Inhibiting Mrt4-rRNA interaction with fumaramidmycin-based derivatives as an antifungal strategy

  • Hongxuan Cao1 na1,
  • Jie Tu2 na1,
  • Jiahui Chen3 na1,
  • Bingzhang Chen4 na1,
  • Zeyue Huang1 na1,
  • Yingjie Wang4 na1,
  • Jing Shen2,
  • Xiuqi Hu1,
  • Jialin Bo1,
  • Li Rao1,
  • Zheng Liu1,
  • Nokwanda P. Makunga5,
  • Muhammad Salman Hameed1,
  • Chen Su6,
  • Jian Wan1,
  • Wenqiang Chang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0187-93633,
  • Chunquan Sheng2 &
  • …
  • Yanliang Ren  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8565-21521 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 4295 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Antifungal agents
  • Ribosome
  • Small molecules
  • Target identification

Abstract

The rise of drug resistance and limitations of current antifungal treatments highlight the urgent need for innovative antifungal strategies. Here we present the development of cis-fumaramidmycin-derived analogs inhibiting the interactions of ribosome assembly factor Mrt4 with rRNA to combat fungal infections. Through antifungal screening, we identified a promising lead 20 with strong efficacy against various drug-resistant fungi, including notorious super-fungus Candida auris. A comprehensive approach combining active-and-inactive-based protein profiling (AIBPP), chemical-genetic profiling, and fluorescence polarization revealed that the antifungal activity of 20 is primarily due to selectively inhibiting essential CaMrt4-rRNA interaction by conjointly covalent engaging C96&C189 on CaMrt4 but inactive for HuMrt4-rRNA interaction, thereby disrupting fungal ribosomal assembly. Therapeutic efficacy of 20 in both Galleria mellonella larvae and murine candidiasis models validate this antifungal strategy. Collectively, our studies provide a potential and much needed therapeutic strategy to address the rapidly rising burden of drug-resistant fungal infections.

Similar content being viewed by others

Molecular mechanisms governing antifungal drug resistance

Article Open access 17 July 2023

Targeting epigenetic regulators to overcome drug resistance in the emerging human fungal pathogen Candida auris

Article Open access 20 May 2025

Impact of antifungal stewardship interventions on the susceptibility of colonized Candida species in pediatric patients with malignancy

Article Open access 08 July 2021

Data availability

The X-ray crystallographic coordinates and structure factors are available from the Protein Data Bank with accession numbers 9IWD and 9XB4, respectively. The RNA-seq data for the transcriptomic analysis generated in this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under the accession code GSE302228. The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD068797 and PXD073550. The data that support the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The molecular dynamics simulations in this work utilized the following publicly available software packages: GROMACS, Plumed (https://www.plumed.org), gmx_MMPBSA (https://valdes-tresancoms.github.io/gmx_MMPBSA), and Qbics (https://www.qbics.info/).

References

  1. Denning, D. W. Global incidence and mortality of severe fungal disease. Lancet Infect. Dis. 24, e428–e438 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Say, R. F. & Fuchs, G. Fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase/phosphatase may be an ancestral gluconeogenic enzyme. Nature 464, 1077–1081 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cowen, L. E. The evolution of fungal drug resistance: modulating the trajectory from genotype to phenotype. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 187–198 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sarma, S. & Upadhyay, S. Current perspective on emergence, diagnosis and drug resistance in Candida auris. Infect. Drug Resist. 10, 155–165 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoenigl, M. et al. COVID-19-associated fungal infections. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 1127–1140 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Perfect, J. R. The antifungal pipeline: a reality check. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 603–616 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, N., Tu, J., Dong, G., Wang, Y. & Sheng, C. Emerging new targets for the treatment of resistant fungal infections. J. Med. Chem. 61, 5484–5511 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher, M. C., Hawkins, N. J., Sanglard, D. & Gurr, S. J. Worldwide emergence of resistance to antifungal drugs challenges human health and food security. Science 360, 739–742 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, Y., Puumala, E., Robbins, N. & Cowen, L. E. Antifungal drug resistance: molecular mechanisms in candida albicans and beyond. Chem. Rev. 121, 3390–3411 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Noda, S., Shirai, T., Mori, Y., Oyama, S. & Kondo, A. Engineering a synthetic pathway for maleate in Escherichia coli. Nat. Commun. 8, 1153 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zaro, B. W., Whitby, L. R., Lum, K. M. & Cravatt, B. F. Metabolically labile fumarate esters impart kinetic selectivity to irreversible inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15841–15844 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Becker, D. et al. Irreversible inhibitors of the 3C protease of Coxsackie virus through templated assembly of protein-binding fragments. Nat. Commun. 7, 12761 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kornberg, M. D. et al. Dimethyl fumarate targets GAPDH and aerobic glycolysis to modulate immunity. Science 360, 449–453 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blair, H. A. Dimethyl fumarate: a review in relapsing-remitting MS. Drugs 79, 1965–1976 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bharate, S. S. Recent developments in pharmaceutical salts: FDA approvals from 2015 to 2019. Drug Discov. Today 26, 384–398 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maruyama, H. B. et al. New antibiotic, fumaramidmycin .1. Production, biological properties and characterization of producer strain. J. Antibiot. 28, 636–647 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bello, I. A., Ndukwe, G. I., Amupitan, J. O., Ayo, R. G. & Shode, F. O. Syntheses and biological activity of some derivatives of C-9154 antibiotic. Int. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 148235 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ma, T. et al. Low-dose metformin targets the lysosomal AMPK pathway through PEN2. Nature 603, 159–165 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bird, R. E., Lemmel, S. A., Yu, X. & Zhou, Q. A. Bioorthogonal chemistry and its applications. Bioconjug. Chem. 32, 2457–2479 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Johansson, H. et al. Fragment-based covalent ligand screening enables rapid discovery of inhibitors for the RBR E3 ubiquitin ligase HOIP. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 2703–2712 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Borsari, C. et al. Covalent proximity scanning of a distal cysteine to target PI3Kalpha. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 6326–6342 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abdeldayem, A., Raouf, Y. S., Constantinescu, S. N., Moriggl, R. & Gunning, P. T. Advances in covalent kinase inhibitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49, 2617–2687 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wen, W. et al. N-acylamino saccharin as an emerging cysteine-directed covalent warhead and its application in the identification of novel fbpase inhibitors toward glucose reduction. J. Med. Chem. 65, 9126–9143 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Owen, D. R. et al. An oral SARS-CoV-2 M(pro) inhibitor clinical candidate for the treatment of COVID-19. Science 374, 1586–1593 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lanning, B. R. et al. A road map to evaluate the proteome-wide selectivity of covalent kinase inhibitors. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 760–767 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wen, W. et al. Structure-guided discovery of the novel covalent allosteric site and covalent inhibitors of fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase to overcome the azole resistance of candidiasis. J. Med. Chem. 65, 2656–2674 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Han, X. et al. Structure-based rational design of novel inhibitors against fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase from Candida albicans. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 57, 1426–1438 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen, X. et al. Potential antifungal targets based on glucose metabolism pathways of Candida albicans. Front. Microbiol. 11, 296 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wei, L. et al. Cov_DOX: a method for structure prediction of covalent protein-ligand bindings. J. Med. Chem. 65, 5528–5538 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hoepfner, D. et al. High-resolution chemical dissection of a model eukaryote reveals targets, pathways and gene functions. Microbiol. Res. 169, 107–120 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Baetz, K. et al. Yeast genome-wide drug-induced haploinsufficiency screen to determine drug mode of action. Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. USA 101, 4525–4530 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  32. McLellan, C. A. et al. Inhibiting mitochondrial phosphate transport as an unexploited antifungal strategy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 135–141 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li, Z. et al. Nuclear export of pre-60S particles through the nuclear pore complex. Nature 618, 411–418 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sarkar, A., Pech, M., Thoms, M., Beckmann, R. & Hurt, E. Ribosome-stalk biogenesis is coupled with recruitment of nuclear-export factor to the nascent 60S subunit. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 1074–1082 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lo, K. Y., Li, Z., Wang, F., Marcotte, E. M. & Johnson, A. W. Ribosome stalk assembly requires the dual-specificity phosphatase Yvh1 for the exchange of Mrt4 with P0. J. Cell Biol. 186, 849–862 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Laserna, V. et al. Dichloro butenediamides as irreversible site-selective protein conjugation reagent. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 60, 23750–23755 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fuchs, B. B., O’Brien, E., El Khoury, J. B. & Mylonakis, E. Methods for usingGalleria mellonellaas a model host to study fungal pathogenesis. Virulence 1, 475–482 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Galbiati, A., Zana, A. & Conti, P. Covalent inhibitors of GAPDH: From unspecific warheads to selective compounds. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 207, 112740 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Odds, F. C., Brown, A. J. P. & Gow, N. A. R. Antifungal agents: mechanisms of action. Trends Microbiol. 11, 272–279 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shastry, M. et al. Species-specific inhibition of fungal protein synthesis by sordarin: identification of a sordarin-specificity region in eukaryotic elongation factor 2The GenBank accession numbers for the sequences reported in this manuscript are AF107286–AF107291, AF292693 and AF248644. Microbiology 147, 383–390 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ruggero, D. et al. Dyskeratosis congenita and cancer in mice deficient in ribosomal RNA modification. Science 299, 259–262 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cao, X. et al. Nascent alt-protein chemoproteomics reveals a pre-60S assembly checkpoint inhibitor. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 643–651 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Pelletier, J., Thomas, G. & Volarevic, S. Ribosome biogenesis in cancer: new players and therapeutic avenues. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 51–63 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nyhus, C., Pihl, M., Hyttel, P. & Hall, V. J. Evidence for nucleolar dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Rev. Neurosci. 30, 685–700 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kawashima, S. A. et al. Potent, reversible, and specific chemical inhibitors of eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis. Cell 167, 512–524 e14 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Thomson, E., Ferreira-Cerca, S. & Hurt, E. Eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 126, 4815–4821 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nikolay, R., Schmidt, S., Schlömer, R., Deuerling, E. & Nierhaus, K. Ribosome assembly as antimicrobial target. Antibiotics 5, 18 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Stokes, J. M. & Brown, E. D. Chemical modulators of ribosome biogenesis as biological probes. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 924–932 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Kashif, M. et al. Recombinant expression and biophysical characterization of Mrt4 protein that involved in mRNA turnover and ribosome assembly from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bioengineered 13, 9103–9113 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Park, J. B., Park, H., Son, J., Ha, S. J. & Cho, H. S. Structural study of monomethyl fumarate-bound human GAPDH. Mol. Cells 42, 597–603 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Li, W. et al. Natural product 1,2,3,4,6-penta-O-galloyl-beta-D-glucopyranose is a reversible inhibitor of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. B 43, 470–482 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kabsch, W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 125–132 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Merkulova, M. et al. Aldolase directly interacts with ARNO and modulates cell morphology and acidic vesicle distribution. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 300, C1442–C1455 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D. & Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 435–447 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2023YFE0110100, Y.R.), Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 22377030, Y.R., 82330109, C.S., 22177036, J.W., 22373039, L.R., 92269102, Y.W. and 82273975, W.C.), the Program for the PCSIRT (No. IRT0953, J.W.). Additional support was provided by Guangdong Pearl River Talent Program (2021QN02Y618, Y.W.) and the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities of China (111 Program, B17019, J.W.). We thank the staff members of Mass Spectrometry System at the National Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai (NFPS), Zhangjiang Lab, China for providing technical support and assistance in data collection and analysis. We also acknowledge the staff of beamline BL10U2 at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF) and BL19U1 beamlines at NFPS, for technical support in X-ray diffraction data collection and analysis. We are grateful to ChomiX biotech (Nanjing, China) for proteomics support. Y.W. acknowledges computational works carried out at the Shenzhen Bay Laboratory Supercomputing Centre.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Hongxuan Cao, Jie Tu, Jiahui Chen, Bingzhang Chen, Zeyue Huang, Yingjie Wang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Green Pesticide, College of Chemistry, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China

    Hongxuan Cao, Zeyue Huang, Xiuqi Hu, Jialin Bo, Li Rao, Zheng Liu, Muhammad Salman Hameed, Jian Wan & Yanliang Ren

  2. The Center for Basic Research and Innovation of Medicine and Pharmacy (MOE), School of Pharmacy, Second Military Medical University (Naval Medical University), Shanghai, China

    Jie Tu, Jing Shen & Chunquan Sheng

  3. Department of Natural Product Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Microbial Technology, Shandong University, Jinan, China

    Jiahui Chen & Wenqiang Chang

  4. Shenzhen Bay Laboratory, Guangdong, China

    Bingzhang Chen & Yingjie Wang

  5. Department of Botany and Zoology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa

    Nokwanda P. Makunga

  6. National Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai, Zhangjiang Lab, Shanghai, China

    Chen Su

Authors
  1. Hongxuan Cao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jie Tu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiahui Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bingzhang Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zeyue Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yingjie Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jing Shen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiuqi Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jialin Bo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Li Rao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Zheng Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Nokwanda P. Makunga
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Muhammad Salman Hameed
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Chen Su
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jian Wan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Wenqiang Chang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Chunquan Sheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Yanliang Ren
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.R., C.S., W.C., and J.W. conceived and designed the experiments. All authors contributed to this work as follows: H.C., J.T., J.C., B.C., Z.H., and Y.W. were contributed equally. Y.R. and H.C. edit the manuscript. H.C. performed the target identification, co-crystal structure determination; Z.H. and J.B. performed the synthesis of hit compounds; J.T. contributed the murine candidiasis models assays; J.C. and W.C. contributed to the chemical-genetic profiling, transcriptional analysis, and Galleria mellonella larvae assays; B.C. and Y. W. performed the molecular dynamic simulation; L.R. and Z.L. performed the binding energy calculations; J.S. contributed to the Mrt4 gene dosage and mutation assays in C. albicans; X.H. performed the Mrt4-rRNA interaction analysis assays, C.S. performed the LC/MS-MS experiments; N.P.M. and M.S.H. contributed to the review and editing of the manuscript. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jian Wan, Wenqiang Chang, Chunquan Sheng or Yanliang Ren.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Olaf Kniemeyer, Sandra Macedo-Ribeiro, and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLS )

Supplementary Data 2 (download XLS )

Supplementary Data 3 (download XLS )

Supplementary Data 4 (download XLS )

Supplementary Data 5 (download XLS )

Supplementary Data 6 (download XLS )

Supplementary Data 7 (download ZIP )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cao, H., Tu, J., Chen, J. et al. Inhibiting Mrt4-rRNA interaction with fumaramidmycin-based derivatives as an antifungal strategy. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70226-4

Download citation

  • Received: 15 November 2025

  • Accepted: 20 February 2026

  • Published: 04 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70226-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research