Abstract
Striatal cholinergic interneurons (CINs) can drive local dopamine release via nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) expressed on dopaminergic axons, but their role in modulating serotonin (5-HT) signaling is poorly understood. Here, we show that synchronous activation of CINs directly triggers local 5-HT release in the dorsal striatum via nAChRs expressed on serotonergic axons. This CIN–5-HT coupling is not detectable in the ventral striatum, despite its substantially denser serotonergic innervation. The nAChR-dependent release not only increases 5-HT levels in the dorsal striatum, but also expands the spatial footprint of serotonergic signaling. In Sapap3-/- mice, a model of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)-like behavior, this mechanism is exaggerated due to a hypercholinergic state, selectively amplifying the nAChR-dependent component of monoamine release. These findings demonstrate a regionally confined form of acetylcholine–5-HT crosstalk in the striatum and identify CINs as regulators of 5-HT dynamics in both healthy and pathological states.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
As the main input nucleus of the basal ganglia, the dorsal striatum guides goal-directed and habit learning by plastically adjusting how it processes cortical inputs1,2. Most of the relevant processes are shaped, at least in part, by the monoamine serotonin (5-HT) – this includes long term depression at corticostriatal synapses3, lateral inhibition between spiny projection neurons4 and release of another monoamine (dopamine) from nigrostriatal projections5. As such, regulation of 5-HT signaling is crucial to striatal function6.
Dysregulated striatal 5-HT signaling has been implicated in numerous neurological, psychiatric and addictive disorders; strikingly, pathological changes in striatal 5-HT signaling may occur in tandem with changes in both dopamine and acetylcholine7,8,9,10. This may not be a coincidence. It has become apparent that monoamines and acetylcholine (ACh) can intimately shape each other’s release in the striatum: for example, dopamine regulates the excitability of striatal cholinergic interneurons11 (CINs), and ACh release from CINs directly facilitates dopamine release by engaging nicotinic ACh receptors (nAChRs) on nigrostriatal axons12,13,14,15,16. Whether such an interplay extends to 5-HT is unclear: it is well-established that 5-HT directly regulates the activity of CINs (and presumably ACh release) in a region-specific manner17,18, but evidence for direct functional control of 5-HT release by ACh is limited19,20,21. The main source of striatal 5-HT is a long range projection from the dorsal raphe nucleus22,23,24,25, and serotonergic axons within the striatum express nAChRs. We therefore sought to determine if CIN-derived ACh can directly facilitate local 5-HT release, in a nAChR-dependent way.
Here, we show that synchronous activation of CINs triggers local 5-HT release in the dorsal, but not ventral, striatum via nAChRs expressed on serotonergic axons. We further show that CIN–5-HT coupling expands the spatial extent of 5-HT release and is selectively amplified in the Sapap3-/- mouse model of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD)–like behavior.
Results
Local nAChR-dependent 5-HT release in the dorsal – but not ventral – striatum
We stereotaxically inoculated the dorsal striatum of mice with an adeno-associated virus (AAV) harboring the genetically-encoded green fluorescent 5-HT sensor, GRAB-5HT26, and when the sensor was expressed, we prepared acute brain slices through the dorsal striatum (Fig. 1a). Intrastriatal electrical stimulation induced a robust increase in GRAB-5HT fluorescence, which decayed over 10 s of seconds, as measured using two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2PLSM) (Fig. 1b) (see Methods). Application of the non-selective nAChR antagonist mecamylamine (10 µM) significantly reduced the amplitude of the striatal GRAB-5HT response (averaged over the region-of-interest, see Methods; Fig. 1a–c), suggesting that, as is the case for dopamine (DA)12,13,14,15,16,27, nAChR activation also facilitates striatal 5-HT release [N = 3 mice, n = 9 slices, t16 = –5.57, P = 4.25·10–5, linear-mixed effect model (LMEM)].
a Schematic of adeno-associated virus (AAV) injection into the DS leading to GRAB-5HT expression (left). Representative field-of-view (FoV) of a region of DS expressing GRAB-5HT imaged with two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2PLSM, right). b GRAB-5HT response to electrical stimulation (10 pulses at 10 Hz, 2 ms), before (black) and after (magenta) application of 10 µM mecamylamine (mec). c Distribution of peak GRAB-5HT responses before and after application of 10 µM mec (N = 3 mice, n = 9 slices, t16 = –5.57, P = 4.25∙10–5, LMEM). Boxplots indicate: range (whiskers), median (thick bar) and 25 and 75th percentiles (box). d Same as (a) for the ventral striatum. e Same as (b) for the ventral striatum. f Same as (c) for the data in (e) (N = 4 mice, n = 23 slices, LMEM). g Schematic of electrical stimulation of sagittal slices through DS indicates the location of the sequence of 100 µm wide rectangular ROIs used to measure the peak GRAB-5HT response as function of distance from the stimulating electrode. (left). Representative traces of GRAB-5HT responses averaged over individual ROIs (0, 200, 500 µm), before (black) and after (magenta) application of 10 µM mec (right). h Lorentzian fit of maximal GRAB-5HT responses as a function of distance from the stimulating electrode (g), before (black) and after (magenta) application of 10 µM mec (N = 3 mice, n = 9 slices, t158 = –2.68, P = 0.0081, LMEM). Horizontal lines indicate means, vertical lines indicate 95% confidence intervals, and circles represent individual datapoints. ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; n.s. – not significant. ACSF – artificial cerebrospinal fluid; LMEM – linear mixed-effects model.
Bath application of DA (10 µM) had no effect on GRAB-5HT fluorescence in slices (Supplementary Fig. 1a–c), confirming that changes in sensor fluorescence were not the result of nonselective detection of DA26. We further confirmed the specificity of GRAB-5HT fluorescence in our experiments by demonstrating that 1) RS 23597-190 (35 µM; a selective antagonist of the 5-HT2C receptor, on which the GRAB-5HT design is based) eliminated evoked fluorescence (N = 3 mice, n = 6 slices, t10 = –3.45, P = 0.006, LMEM) (Supplementary Fig. 2a, b) and 2) citalopram (30 µM), a selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), significantly reduced the amplitude of the 5-HT release (N = 4 mice, n = 12 slices, t22 = –4.64, P = 1.3·10–4, LMEM), likely due to presynaptic inhibition of release by 5-HT1B auto-receptors18,28,29,30,31,32, and significantly slowed the temporal decay of evoked fluorescence (N = 4 mice, n = 12 slices, t22 = –4.29, P = 3·10–4, LMEM), neither of which could be attributed to the passage of time (Supplementary Fig. 2c–h).
Compared to the dorsal striatum, the ventral striatum receives substantially denser 5-HT innervation33,34. We therefore tested whether nAChRs also facilitate 5-HT release in ventral striatum. Surprisingly, we found that while electrical stimulation elicited robust increases in GRAB-5HT fluorescence in the ventral striatum, their amplitude was not reduced by mecamylamine (Fig. 1d–fN = 4 mice, n = 23 slices, t40 = 0.399, P = 0.692, LMEM), suggesting that nAChRs do not contribute to 5-HT release in the ventral striatum.
nAChRs extend the spatial range of striatal 5-HT release
We and others have shown that activation of nAChRs on nigrostriatal axon terminals not only increases the amount of DA release, but also nearly doubles the spatial range of its release12,13. We therefore measured the spatial extent of GRAB-5HT responses by quantifying evoked fluorescence at 100 µm-wide increments from the stimulating electrode and fitting a Lorentzian function to the maximal responses (N = 3 mice, n = 9 slices) as a function of distance (Fig. 1g, h). The Lorentzian fell off with a length scale of 183 µm under control conditions. Mecamylamine application not only reduced the overall amplitude of the response (t158 = –5.8, P = 3.55·10–8, LMEM), but also significantly shortened the length scale of the Lorentzian to 126 µm (t158 = 2.68, P = 0.0081, LMEM), indicating that nAChRs increase the spatial extent of striatal 5-HT release by approximately 45% (Fig. 1h).
Optogenetic activation of CINs saturates striatal nAChR-dependent 5-HT release
We observed that intrastriatal electrical stimulation in the dorsal striatum promotes nAChR-sensitive release of 5-HT, but can endogenous ACh released from CINs drive nAChR-dependent release of striatal 5-HT on its own? To this end, we inoculated the dorsal striatum of ChAT-Cre mice (which express Cre recombinase under the choline acetyltransferase promoter in CINs) with a mixture of the AAVs harboring GRAB-5HT (broadly labeling the dorsal striatum) and DIO-channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-mCherry (specifically labeling CINs) (see Methods) (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Fig. 3a). The two-photon laser scanning per se did not alter the electrophysiological behavior of CINs (N = 5 mice, n = 8 CINs, t26 = –1.35, P = 0.18, LMEM) (Supplementary Fig. 3d–i). A brief (1 ms) 470 nm (32 mW) LED stimulation, which is sufficient to drive a time locked action potential in recorded CINs (Supplementary Fig. 3f), resulted in a significant increase in GRAB-5HT fluorescence, with a slow decay lasting tens of seconds (Fig. 2b). Evoked changes in GRAB-5HT fluorescence were not an optical artifact of blue light stimulation, as: 1) under our experimental conditions, 470 nm LED simulation on its own did not alter GRAB-5HT fluorescence (Supplementary Fig. 1d, e), and 2) CIN-dependent 5-HT release could be replicated by optogenetically activating CINs using the red-shifted opsin [using 1 ms, 590 nm (7.3 mW) LED pulses in dorsal striatal brain slices from ChAT-cre mice inoculated with a mixture of GRAB-5HT and cre-dependent ChrimsonR-tdTomato] (Supplementary Fig. 4). Thus, synchronous activation of CINs is sufficient to evoke 5-HT release in the dorsal striatum. The GRAB-5HT signal was completely abolished by 10 μM mecamylamine or dihydro-β-erythroidine (DHβE), suggesting that CIN-evoked 5-HT release is mediated by α4β2 type nAChRs [ChR2: N = 3 mice, n = 9 slices with mecamylamine, N = 1 mouse, n = 3 slices with DHβE (pooled) t22 = –7.9., P = 7.3·10–8, LMEM; Chrimson: N = 2 mice, n = 11 slices (all with mecamylamine), t20 = –7.18, P = 5.9·10–7, LMEM] (Fig. 2b, c; Supplementary Fig. 4b, c).
a Schematic of AAV injection into the DS leading to non-selective expression of GRAB-5HT and selective expression of channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2)-mCherry in CINs in ChAT-cre mice (left). 2PLSM image of a representative region of DS expressing GRAB-5HT (green) overlaid with a Z-stacked image of CINs expressing ChR2-mCherry (red). b GRAB-5HT response to a brief (1 ms long) optogenetic stimulation (470 nm), before (black) and after (magenta) application of 10 µM mecamylamine (mec). Vertical cyan line indicates a brief period of blanking of the stimulation artifact (see Methods). c Distribution of peak GRAB-5HT responses before (black) and after (magenta) application of nAChR blockers (mec and DHβE data pooled, N = 4 mice, n = 12 slices, t22 = –7.9, P = 7.3·10–8, LMEM). d nAChR-dependent 5-HT release in the DS (left) and the ventral striatum (right, gray background) evoked by electrical (black) and optogenetic (red) stimulation [ventral vs. dorsal: N = 7 mice, n = 21 slices, t26 = –4.5, P = 1.2·10–4 (electrical), N = 11 mice, n = 28 slices,, t32 = –5.24, P = 9.9·10–6 (optogenetic), LMEM]. e Same as (b), with the additional blue trace indicating the response after the application of a cocktail of glutamatergic, GABAergic and muscarinic receptor blockers. f Same as (c) for the data in (e). g Distribution of response decay kinetics before (black) and after (blue) application of cocktail of antagonists (N = 3 mice, n = 8 slices, mec vs. ACSF: t21 = –6.02, P = 5.69·10-6, cocktail vs. mec: t21 = –5.42, P = 2.19·10-5, LMEM). Boxplots indicate: range (whiskers), median (thick bar) and 25 and 75th percentiles (box). ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; n.s – not significant. ACSF – artificial cerebrospinal fluid; LMEM – linear mixed-effects model.
Strikingly, the increase in GRAB-5HT fluorescence induced by synchronous optogenetic activation CINs is similar to the nAChR-dependent component of the GRAB-5HT signal evoked by electrical stimulation (Fig. 2d) (N = 9 mice, n = 25 slices, t23 = 0.01, P = 0.99, LMEM), suggesting that CINs are likely the sole source of ACh that promotes release of 5-HT in the dorsal striatum. Consistent with the results presented above using electrical stimulation (Fig. 1d–f), optogenetic stimulation of CINs failed to elicit detectable 5-HT release in ventral striatum (Supplementary Fig. 5) (N = 7 mice, n = 25 slices, t45 = 0.95 P = 0.35, LMEM).
Is CIN control of 5-HT release direct, or are the key ACh receptors on striatal loci other than serotonergic axons? To rule out the involvement of postsynaptic nAChRs on GABAergic interneurons35, presynaptic nAChRs on glutamatergic inputs36 or muscarinic ACh receptors in general37,38 we repeated the above experiment in the presence of GABA, glutamate and muscarinic ACh receptor antagonists (10 µM SR 95531, 2 µM CPG 55845, 10 µM DNQX, 50 µM D-AP5 and 10 µM atropine). This antagonist cocktail had no significant effect on either the amplitude (N = 3 mice, n = 8 slices, t21 = –0.59, P = 0.56, LMEM) or the temporal decay (t21 = –1.98, P = 0.061, LMEM) of the CIN-evoked 5-HT release, which was eliminated by subsequent blockade of nAChRs (Fig. 2e–g). Together, these data suggest that ACh acts directly on nAChRs located on 5-HT fibers to mediate 5-HT release [t21 = –6.02, P = 5.69·10-6 (ACSF vs. mec), t21 = –5.42, P = 2.19·10-5 (cocktail vs. mec), LMEM]. Nevertheless, to determine whether nAChRs amplify a putative co-release of 5-HT from DA axons39, or any other mechanism by which excitation of striatal DA axons may indirectly cause the release of striatal 5-HT, we inoculated 1) the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) of TH-Cre mice (which express Cre-recombinase under the tyrosine hydroxylase promoter) with an AAV harboring DIO-ChR2-mCherry and 2) the dorsal striatum with an AAV harboring GRAB-5HT (Supplementary Fig. 6a–d). Direct optogenetic activation of DA fibers induced a small but significant increase in GRAB-5HT. The increase, however, was only about a fifth of the size of the GRAB-5HT signal generated by synchronous optogenetic activation of CINs (Fig. 2c, e, Supplementary Fig. 4) and was insensitive to mecamylamine, indicating that DA axons do not contribute to the nAChR-dependent release of striatal 5-HT (Supplementary Fig. 6e, f).
nAChR-dependent monoamine release is elevated in a mouse model of OCD
If CINs induce the release of 5-HT under physiological conditions, then in a pathophysiologically hypercholinergic striatum this mechanism should be amplified. We recently reported that Sapap3-/- mice, which display OCD-like motor behaviors such as compulsive grooming, exhibit a hypercholinergic phenotype in the striatum: the density of CINs is higher, their autonomous firing rate is higher, and they release more ACh in response to electrical stimulation in acute striatal slices40. We therefore asked whether cholinergic modulation of 5-HT release is amplified in Sapap3-/- mice. Indeed, intrastriatal electrical stimulation in the dorsal striatum induced significantly larger GRAB-5HT fluorescence signals in the dorsal striatum of Sapap3-/- mice, and this difference disappeared in the presence of mecamylamine (Fig. 3). Supporting the conclusion that elevated 5-HT release is the result of increased CIN-mediated ACh release, only the mecamylamine-sensitive component of the GRAB-5HT signal was elevated in Sapap3-/- mice (Fig. 3c), suggesting that basal striatal 5-HT release capacity is unaltered. Corroborating that ACh facilitates 5-HT release by a mechanism similar to the one by which it facilitates DA release, intrastriatal electrical stimulation also induced significantly higher nAChR-sensitive (but not nAChR-insensitive) striatal DA release in Sapap3-/- mice (Supplementary Fig. 7). Overall, this is consistent with the observation that 5-HT turnover (but not baseline levels) is elevated in Sapap3-/- mice41.
a Representative line scan traces of GRAB-5HT fluorescence in the dorsal striatum of wild type (WT) (top, black) and knockout (KO) Sapap3 (bottom, blue) mice, before and after bath application of mecamylamine (mec, magenta). b Distribution of peak GRAB-5HT responses before (black – WT, cyan - KO) and after (magenta) application of mecamylamine in WT (left, N = 5 mice, n = 9 slices t16 = –3.5054, P = 0.002, LMEM) and KO (right, N = 6 mice, n = 12 slices t22 = –6.066, P = 4.2∙ 10-6 LMEM). c Quantification of mec-sensitive (left, t19 = 2.89, P = 0.009) and -insensitive (right, t19 = 9.5∙ 10-5 P = 0.999, LMEM) components of GRAB-5HT signal in WT and KO mice. Boxplots indicate: range (whiskers), median (thick bar) and 25 and 75th percentiles (box). * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; n.s – not significant. ACSF – artificial cerebrospinal fluid.
Discussion
While the presence of nAChRs on 5-HT axons in the striatum was previously reported19,20,21, we provide a functional demonstration that activation of CINs can induce local 5-HT release, a phenomenon that extends our understanding of reciprocal ACh-monoamine regulation to include 5-HT12,13,15,16,17,18,27. Specifically, as previously shown for DA12,13, ACh released by CINs can directly induce, amplify and extend the spatial footprint of striatal 5-HT release via activation of axonal nAChRs. The present study employed convergent pharmacological and circuit-based evidence to demonstrate CIN-dependent 5-HT release; future studies may utilize additional approaches, such as selectively knocking down nAChR subunit expression in serotonergic dorsal raphe neurons or testing 5-HT-insensitive GRAB variants, to further corroborate and expand upon these findings.
While we observed CIN-dependent 5-HT release in the dorsal striatum, this mechanism was absent in the ventral striatum. This finding appears counterintuitive, given that 5-HT innervation density is greater in the ventral striatum33,34. One interpretation is that this difference reflects the lower density of CINs in the ventral striatum42,43, suggesting that CIN density, rather than 5-HT axonal density, may be the key determinant of this neuromodulatory interaction. Alternatively, the 5-HT fibers that innervate the dorsal and ventral striatum may have different nAChR expression profiles, leading to differential sensitivity to ACh24,44. Other region-specific aspects of CIN function and 5-HT signaling may further amplify regional differences. In the dorsal striatum, 5-HT increases CIN excitability and firing rate, whereas in the ventral striatum 5-HT does the opposite17,18,45. This differential modulation, combined with regional heterogeneities in CIN intrinsic function, may synergize to shape the release dynamics of both ACh46,47 and 5-HT.
We have provided an ex vivo demonstration that activation of CINs leads to local nAChR-dependent 5-HT release. How may this mechanism be engaged in vivo? In the case of DA, where release is augmented by the same mechanism that we report for 5-HT, this has turned out to be a difficult question to answer – multiple labs over 3 decades have reported in vitro nAChR-dependent DA release39,48,49 driven by CINs12,13,14,15,16, but attempts to demonstrate how this mechanism is engaged in vivo15,50 have been met by skepticism or constrained success51,52,53. Very recently, however, this long-standing impasse has been broken by the identification of specific behavioral conditions under which CINs are recruited to augment DA release in vivo54. Thus, context is critical52,55,56. This is likely to be the case for modulation of 5-HT release in vivo as well – based on the work examining CIN-dependent DA release in vivo, it is unlikely we would stumble upon a measurable CIN-dependent 5-HT release in the absence of an appropriately defined behavioral or circuit-state context. One potential clue comes from the observation that local transfusion of nicotine, albeit independent of CIN activity, has been shown to be necessary and sufficient to drive striatal 5-HT release, but only in the presence of a stressful stimulus (foot shock)21. The precise activity of CINs that would be required to evoke 5-HT in this context is unclear, and may not be on the same sub-second timescale of the coupling we describe. Thus, future work is needed to determine the behavioral context in which nAChR activation leads to time-locked local release of 5-HT, but we show here that the requisite mechanism is in place and selectively restricted to specific striatal subregions. Notably, CINs are recruited synchronously by salient events, usually by way of activation of their thalamic input57,58,59, so the CIN synchrony required to drive local 5-HT release is likely attained in vivo.
Local coupling between ACh and 5-HT release is exaggerated in the striatum of Sapap3-/- mice, which exhibit pathologically elevated ACh release40, suggesting that nicotinic amplification of monoamine release may be a general property of hypercholinergic states in the striatum. Notably, it is only the nAChR-dependent component of locally induced monoamine release that is increased in Sapap3-/- mice (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 7c). Moreover, in the case of 5-HT, the nAChR-dependent component becomes even larger than the non-nAChR-dependent component, indicating that local hijacking of 5-HT fibers may become the main medium of 5-HT release in Sapap3-/- mice. If and how pathological modulation of 5-HT release is further shaped by other striatal circuit components (i.e., GABAergic interneurons and astrocytes) or varies across species60 remains to be determined.
What does this imply for the etiology of OCD-like behaviors? The first-line pharmacological treatment for OCD is selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs); while the mechanism of action is typically thought to involve increasing 5-HT tone, conclusive proof is lacking and some evidence suggests that chronic SSRI treatment may suppress 5-HT synthesis10,61. The answer to this question is beyond the scope of our current study, but our data offer a mechanism for monoamine dysregulation in a mouse model of compulsive behavior.
Hypercholinergic states arise in the striatum in other neurological disorders, notably Parkinson’s disease (PD)62, raising the possibility that exaggerated recruitment of 5-HT release by CINs may contribute to PD pathophysiology. In particular, after the loss of dopaminergic innervation to the striatum, 5-HT fibers proliferate and their terminals convert levodopa into DA, resulting in the non-canonical release of DA from 5-HT terminals63,64. Given the growing evidence implicating CINs in levodopa induced dyskinesia (LID)65,66,67, it is tempting to speculate that abnormal CIN activity could amplify this non-canonical release of DA leading to dyskinetic symptoms64. On a final speculative note, evidence suggests that both dopamine and 5-HT may set behavioral states that shape learning and disease68. Our data suggest a mechanism by which CINs may facilitate interactions between such monoamine-dependent states.
Methods
Animals
Experimental procedures adhered to and received prior written approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC) of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HUJI, protocol number MD-20-16113-3) and Stony Brook University (SBU). Experiments were carried out in the following mouse strains: 1. C57BL/6 J mice (Strain #:000664; Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME, USA); 2. ChAT-IRES-Cre (∆neo) transgenic mice (stock number 031661; Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME, USA); 3. TH-Cre 1 (Strain #:008601; Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, ME, USA, RRID:IMSR_JAX:008601); and 4. Sapap3 conditional knock-in mice40. All Sapap3-/- mice lacked both copies of the Sapap3 gene. Two-to-seven-month-old C57BL/6 J and transgenic mice were used for experiments. Sapap3-/- mice were 3-7 months old, when they exhibited compulsive grooming. Sex was not considered as a factor in the design of the experiments, and so mice of both sexes were used and their results pooled. All mice were housed under a 12 h light/dark cycle with food and water ad libitum. Ambient temperatures and humidity were 22 °C ± 2 °C and 50 ± 10%, respectively.
Stereotaxic surgeries
At HUJI
Mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane in a non-rebreathing system (2.5% induction, 1–1.5% maintenance) and placed in a stereotaxic frame (model 940, Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA, USA). Temperature was maintained at 35 °C with a heating pad, antibiotic eye ointment was applied to prevent corneal drying, and animals were hydrated with a bolus of injectable saline (5 ml/kg) mixed with an analgesic (5 mg/kg meloxicam). To calibrate specific injection coordinates, the distance between bregma and lambda bones was measured and stereotaxic placement of the mice was readjusted to achieve maximum accuracy. A small hole was bored into the skull with a micro drill bit and a glass pipette with AAVs attached to Nanoject III system (Drummond) was slowly inserted at the relevant coordinates under aseptic conditions. The coordinates of dorsal striatum (DS) injection were: +0.5 mm anteroposterior (AP); +/- 2.3 mm mediolateral (ML); −2.8 mm dorsoventral (DV), and for the SNc: -3.1 mm anteroposterior (AP); +/- 1.2 mm mediolateral (ML); −4.2 mm dorsoventral (DV) relative to bregma using a flat skull position. The coordinates of the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core injection were: +1.5 mm anteroposterior (AP); +/- 0.9 mm mediolateral (ML); −4.1 mm dorsoventral (DV). To minimize backflow, solution was slowly injected (1 nl/second) and the pipette was left in place for 5–7 min before slowly retracting it. For 5-HT sensor experiments, a total amount of 500 nl of an adeno-associated virus harboring the green-fluorescent GRAB-5HT3.5 construct (AAV-9hSyn-5HT3.5; 2.20 × 1013 vg/ml; WZ Biosciences Inc. Lot No. 20201210), recently renamed g5-HT2h21, was injected into DS or 300 nl to the NAc. For optogenetic stimulations of CINs a total amount of 650 nl adeno-associated virus cocktail of GRAB-5HT3.5 construct and ChR2 construct (AAV5/ Ef1a-DIO-hchR2(H134R)-mCherry; 4× 1012 vg/ml; UNC vector core; Lot# AV4313-2A) or Chrimson construct (pAAV/Syn-FLEX-rc[ChrimsonR-tdTomato]; 12× 1012 vg/ml; Addgene #62723 – AAV5; Lot# v122159) was injected into DS of ChAT-IRES-Cre mice; for optogenetic stimulation of dopamine axons 500 nl of GRAB-5HT3.5 was injected into the DS and 250 nl of the ChR2 construct in to the SNc of TH-Cre mice.
At SBU (experiments involving Sapap3 -/- mice)
Mice were induced and maintained under anesthesia via inhalation of vaporized isoflurane (3% induction, 1–2% for maintenance). Prior to any surgical procedures, sedation was confirmed via toe pinch, then animals were placed in a stereotaxic apparatus, the scalp was shaved and disinfected with 70% ethanol and Betadine solution, and eyes were covered with protective gel (Puralube Ophthalmic Ointment, Dechra Veterinary Products). A 1 μL Hamilton Neuros micro-volume syringe was used for unilateral DS injections (0.5-62 mm AP; −2.2-3 mm ML; −2.8 mm DV) and manipulated via a motorized stereotaxic injector (Quintessential Stereotaxic Injector QSI, Stoelting Co.) guided by Angle Two software (Leica Biosystems). 500 nl of AAV9-hSyn-5HT3.5 (≥1x1013vg/ml) or AAV9-hSyn-dLight1.1 (≥1x1013vg/ml) were injected over 5 min and a further 5 min was allowed for diffusion before slowly withdrawing the needle. All mice were administered analgesic (Meloxicam, 5 mg/kg, subcutaneous injection) immediately after surgery and monitored daily for 72 h.
Acute slice preparation
At HUJI
After prolonged incubation time (at least 3 weeks), inoculated mice were deeply anesthetized with ketamine (200 mg/kg)–xylazine (23.32 mg/kg) and perfused transcardially with ice-cold modified artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) bubbled with 95% O2–5% CO2, and containing (in mM): 2.5 KCl, 26 NaHCO3, 1.25 Na2HPO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 10 MgSO4, 0.4 ascorbic acid, 10 glucose, and 210 sucrose. The brain was removed and sagittal slices sectioned at a thickness of 275 µm were obtained in ice-cold modified ACSF. Slices were then submerged in ACSF, bubbled with 95% O2–5% CO2, and containing (in mM): 2.5 KCl, 126 NaCl, 26 NaHCO3, 1.25 Na2HPO4, 2 CaCl2, 2 MgSO4, and 10 glucose, and stored at room temperature for at least 1 h prior to recording.
At SBU (experiments involving Sapap3 -/- mice)
2-5 weeks after surgery, acute coronal slices (275 μm) containing DS were obtained from mice following anesthetization with ketamine/xylazine (100 mg/kg / 7 mg/kg) and transcardial perfusion with ice-cold artificial cerebral spinal fluid (ACSF) containing (in mM): 124 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 1.5 MgCl2, 26 NaHCO3, 1 NaH2PO4, and 14 glucose. Slices were cut using a VT-1000 S vibratome (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL) and transferred to a holding chamber where they were incubated at 32 °C for 45 min in ASCF containing (in mM) 2 CaCl2 and 1 MgCl2, then kept at room temperature until recording. During recordings, slices were perfused with ACSF heated to 32 °C. All solutions were continuously bubbled with carbogen (95% O2 and 5% CO2).
Slice visualization and 2PLSM imaging
At HUJI
Slices were transferred to the recording chamber of Femto2D-resonant scanner multiphoton system (Femtonics Ltd., Budapest, Hungary) and perfused with oxygenated ACSF at 32 °C. A ×16, 0.8 NA water immersion objective was used to examine the slice using oblique illumination.
2PLSM monoamine imaging and electrical / optogenetic stimulation
The 2PLSM excitation source was a Chameleon Vision 2 tunable pulsed laser system (680–1080 nm; Coherent Laser Group, Santa Clara, CA). Optical imaging of GRAB-5HT3.5 signals was performed by using a 920-nm excitation beam (10 mW after the objective), cholinergic mCherry imaging was performed by using a 1060 nm excitation beam. The fluorescence emission was detected and collected with gated GaAsP photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) for high sensitivity detection of fluorescence photons as part of the Femto2D-resonant scanner. Optical and electrophysiological data were obtained using the software package MESc (Femtonics, Budapest, Hungary), which also integrates the control of all hardware units in the microscope, opotogenetics & electrical stimulator. The software automates and synchronizes the imaging signals and stimulations (electrical/optical). Data were extracted from the MESc package (Femtonics) to personal computers using custom-made code in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) code.
Fields-of-view (FoV) of approximately 307 µm × 307 µm were selected and imaged at 31 Hz. Scans were performed using 0.6 μm pixels. Regions-of-interest (ROI) where fluorescence was highly expressed in the slice were identified automatically via custom MATLAB code binarizing the image by pixel intensities. The system is also equipped with full-field 470 nm and 590 nm LED illumination, which was used to stimulate the CINs in the ChAT-IRES-Cre mice transfected with DIO-hchR2(H132R)-mCherry, or with FLEX-rc[ChrimsonR-tdTomato], respectively. We empirically chose a LED stimulus amplitude (32 mW and 7.3 mW, respectively, after the objective) that reliably gave measurable GRAB-5HT responses, and a pulse duration of 1 ms as this sufficed to reliably trigger a single action potential in CINs (Supplementary Fig. 3f). Five milliseconds before the LED pulse, the gated PMTs were turned off for a duration of 50 ms. Nevertheless, despite removal of the voltage from the dynode of the PMT the massive flux of blue photons creates a huge photocurrent on the GaAsP photocathode which subsequently saturate the sensor’s electronics leading to a light artifact in the signal lasting approximately 250 ms, evident even in non-expressing slices from wild type mice. Therefore, the first 258 ms (8 samples at 31 Hz) after any LED stimulation were removed from the data of all optogenetic experiments, which precludes observing the initial rise of the GRAB signals. When using ChrimsonR-tdTomato (Supplementary Fig. 4), for consistency, the same procedures were carried out. Electrical stimulation was carried out by a parallel bipolar Platinum-Iridium electrode with diameter of 125 µm and spacing of 500 µm (FHC, PBSA0575). The magnitude of the stimulus was controlled through a stimulus isolator (ISO-Flex, MicroProbes) while the frequency and duration were controlled by computer software (MESc, Femtonics). A total of 10 pulses (10 Hz, 2 ms duration, 3 mA) were delivered to elicit a maximal response (Supplementary Fig. 8)13. To obtain sufficient signal-to-noise-ratio each optogenetic experiment was repeated 9 times, and each electric stimulation experiment was repeated 4 times with a 60 second inter-stimulus-interval. Traces were averaged over all repetitions and smoothed with a Gaussian filter with a width of approximately 400 ms. Fluorescent changes over time (∆F/F0) were calculated as \(\triangle F/{F}_{0}=(F-{F}_{0})/{F}_{0}\), where F is the maximal fluorescent value within 5 seconds of the stimulation recorded while evoking electrical / optogenetic stimulations; and where F0 denotes the averaged baseline fluorescence (1-3 s long, as appropriate for each experiment) before the stimulation.
Slopes for ACSF, Cocktail and Citalopram conditions were extracted by a linear fit from the peak amplitude to the end of the decay duration. In Fig. 2b, d and Supplementary Fig. 2a, amplitude and slopes were reported after subtraction of the slope of the mecamylamine condition to account for photobleaching using the DETREND command in MATLAB.
Time lapse imaging
One-second-long time lapse imaging (Supplementary Fig. 1) were taken with ~30 seconds interval. Each point was calculated as the mean fluorescence intensity in the ROI (method explained above) over entire recording session (parameter mentioned above). 10 µM DA or 10 µM 5-HT were diluted in ACSF (see above) and perfused onto recording chamber for ~ 15 minutes.
Estimation of GRAB-5HT spatial scale
In Fig.1h, ∆F/F0 data points were fitted with a Lorentzian function \(a/[1+{(x/\lambda )}^{2}]\) to extract the length scale λ of the fluorescence signals’ decay with distance. Individual mice were considered independent samples.
Whole cell recording and electrophysiology
For whole-cell current-clamp recordings from CINs, the pipette contained (in mM): 135.5 KCH3SO4, 5 KCl, 2.5 NaCl, 5 Na-phosphocreatine, 10 HEPES, 0.2 EGTA, 0.21 Na2GTP, and 2 Mg1.5ATP (pH = 7.3 with KOH, 280–290 mOsm/kg). CINs were identified by expression of red mCherry molecules along with their morphology, spontaneous firing and by the presence of a voltage-sag (due to their prominent HCN currents).
At SBU (Slice 2PLSM 5-HT and dopamine sensor imaging in experiments involving Sapap3 -/- mice)
Recordings were made using an Ultima Laser Scanning Microscope system (Bruker Nano, Inc, Middleton, WI) equipped with an Olympus 60X/1.0 water-dipping lens (Olympus, Center Valley, PA) and Chameleon Ultra II laser (Coherent, Inc., Santa Clara, CA). To evoke 5-HT or dopamine release, a bipolar stimulating microelectrode (FHC Inc., Bowdoin, ME) powered by an ISO-Flex Stimulus Isolator (Microprobes for Life Science) was embedded into the surface of the slice just outside the 60x objective field-of-view (200μm2 FOV area). 2-photon laser line scans in the shape of a spiral (920 nm, 10μs/pixel dwell, 21.2-83 ms/line) covering the entire FOV were acquired while delivering electrical stimuli (1 s at 10 Hz, 2 ms pulse width, 3 mA for 5-HT; single 1 ms pulse for dopamine). Line scans began 2 s before stimulation and continued for 57 s (5-HT) or 8 s (dopamine) after stimulation ended. 10 µM mec or DHβE were then perfused onto the slice for 10 min and the line scan protocol was repeated. For baseline and post-drug recordings, three 60 s recordings were averaged. ΔF/F0 was calculated as above.
Immunohistochemistry and confocal imaging
After viral injection (see stereotaxic surgeries), mice were deeply anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine followed by cold perfusion to the heart of PBS and 4% PFA. The brain was removed and kept overnight at 4 °C in 4% PFA. The next day, the brain was washed in PBS (three times, 20 min each) before thin 50 µm coronal slices were made using a vibratome (Leica VT1000S). Slices were briefly washed with CAS-BLOCK (Life Technologies) before being incubated in CAS-BLOCK (300 µl) overnight with Goat anti Vesicular-Acetylcholine-transporter antibodies (ABN100MI, Thermo Fisher, LOT: 3974859,1:200). The slices were then washed in PBS (three times, 20 min each) and incubated with CAS-BLOCK and secondary antibodies (Abcam ab6566, LOT: GRI159765-18, 1:200) for 3 hr. Antifade Mounting Medium (VECTASHIELD) was applied to prevent slice bleaching.
Confocal imaging was acquired by Spinning Disk confocal microscope (Nikon) using Yokogawa W1 Spinning Disk camera and a 50 µm pinhole and a 20x dry objective with 0.75 N. A (CFI PLAN APO VC). Excitation laser used were 488 nm, 561 nm, 638 nm to excite GRAB-5HT, mCherry, anti VAChT, respectively. Optical and data were obtained using the software package NIS (Nikon), which also integrates the control of all hardware units in the microscope. Data was extracted from the ND2 package to personal computers and visualized with Fiji software. Low-magnification images were acquired using Nikon SMZ-25 fluorescent stereoscope equipped with ×1 and ×2 objectives.
Statistical analysis
Due to the nested design of this experiment, wherein we sampled multiple slices from individual mice, we fit the data with a linear mixed-effects model (LMEM), where ∆F/F0 from each slice was modeled as a sum of a fixed effect product (e.g., drug vs. ACSF) plus uncorrelated random effects due to each individual mouse. When fitting the Lorentzian, the model was of a product of two fixed effect, which are the treatment and the distance. To fit the LMEMs to the data, we used the MATLAB (Mathworks) FITLME command. We report the number of mice, the number of slices, Student’s tdof statistic (dof = degrees of freedom) and two-sided P values. The null hypotheses were rejected if the P value was below 0.05. For the bootstrap analysis of spike latency, recordings were obtained from 9 cells across 5 animals. The latency of the first spike from the onset of each recording was measured and compared against a bootstrap distribution generated by sampling spike times from the first 5 seconds of the recording 100,000 times. LED-evoked spike latencies and spontaneous first-spike latencies were each tested against this bootstrap distribution (Supplementary Fig. 3g).
Reagents used
Mecamylamine hydrochloride (mec), Sigma-Aldrich, Lot # 019M4108V CAS: 826-39-1; Atropine sulfate salt monohydrate, Sigma-Aldrich, Lot # BCBH8339V CAS No.: 5908-99-6; SR 95531 hydrobromide (Gabazine), Hello Bio, CAS: 104104-50-9; DNQX, Tocris, CAS: 2379-57-9; D-AP5, Hello Bio, CAS:79055-68-8; CGP 55845 hydrochloride, Hello Bio, CAS: 149184-22-5; Dihydro-β-erythroidine hydrobromide, Tocris, CAS: 29734-68-7; Citalopram hydrobromide (HB2142), Hello Bio, CAS [59729-32-7]; Dopamine hydrochloride (DA), Sigma-Aldrich, CAS No.: 62-31-7; RS 23597-190, Tocris, CAS No.: 149719-06-2. Serotonin (5HT), Sigma-Aldrich, CAS No.: 153-98-0.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
All data underlying the figures and statistical analyses in this study, including processed fluorescence traces and electrophysiological recordings, are available in Dryad https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2z34tmq18. The original raw imaging data consist of large, proprietary-format microscopy files whose size and format preclude practical public deposition. These raw image files, along with the regions of interest (ROIs) used for analysis, are available from the corresponding author upon request. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
No custom computer code or algorithms central to the conclusions of this study were developed. Data analysis was performed using standard, built-in MATLAB functions for statistical testing, linear mixed-effects modeling, and data visualization. Any scripts used to reproduce the reported analyses are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Balleine, B. W. & O’Doherty, J. P. Human and rodent homologies in action control: corticostriatal determinants of goal-directed and habitual action. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 48–69 (2010).
Zhai, S., Tanimura, A., Graves, S. M., Shen, W. & Surmeier, D. J. Striatal synapses, circuits, and Parkinson’s disease. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 48, 9–16 (2018).
Mathur, B. N., Capik, N. A., Alvarez, V. A. & Lovinger, D. M. Serotonin induces long-term depression at corticostriatal synapses. J. Neurosci. 31, 7402–7411 (2011).
Pommer, S., Akamine, Y., Schiffmann, S. N., de Kerchove d’Exaerde, A. & Wickens, J. R. The effect of serotonin receptor 5-HT1B on lateral inhibition between spiny projection neurons in the mouse striatum. J. Neurosci. 41, 7831–7847 (2021).
Benloucif, S. & Galloway, M. P. Facilitation of dopamine release in vivo by serotonin agonists: studies with microdialysis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 200, 1–8 (1991).
Mathur, B. N. & Lovinger, D. M. Endocannabinoid-dopamine interactions in striatal synaptic plasticity. Front. Pharmacol. 3, 66 (2012).
Brichta, L., Greengard, P. & Flajolet, M. Advances in the pharmacological treatment of Parkinson’s disease: targeting neurotransmitter systems. Trends Neurosci. 36, 543–554 (2013).
Williams, M. J. & Adinoff, B. The role of acetylcholine in cocaine addiction. Neuropsychopharmacol 33, 1779–1797 (2008).
Taracha, E. The role of serotoninergic system in psychostimulant effects. Postepy Psychiatr. Neurol. 30, 258–269 (2021).
Robbins, T. W., Vaghi, M. M. & Banca, P. Obsessive-compulsive disorder: puzzles and prospects. Neuron 102, 27–47 (2019).
Surmeier, D. J., Carrillo-Reid, L. & Bargas, J. Dopaminergic modulation of striatal neurons, circuits and assemblies. Neuroscience 198, 3 (2011).
Liu, C. et al. An action potential initiation mechanism in distal axons for the control of dopamine release. Science 375, 1378–1385 (2022).
Matityahu, L. et al. Acetylcholine waves and dopamine release in the striatum. Nat. Commun. 14, 6852 (2023).
Kramer, P. F. et al. Synaptic-like axo-axonal transmission from striatal cholinergic interneurons onto dopaminergic fibers. Neuron 110, 2949–2960 (2022).
Cachope, R. et al. Selective activation of cholinergic interneurons enhances accumbal phasic dopamine release: setting the tone for reward processing. Cell Rep. 2, 33–41 (2012).
Threlfell, S. et al. Striatal dopamine release is triggered by synchronized activity in cholinergic interneurons. Neuron 75, 58–64 (2012).
Blomeley, C. & Bracci, E. Excitatory effects of serotonin on rat striatal cholinergic interneurones. J. Physiol. 569, 715 (2005).
Virk, M. S. et al. Opposing roles for serotonin in cholinergic neurons of the ventral and dorsal striatum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 734–739 (2016).
Schwartz, R. D., Lehmann, J. & Kellar, K. J. Presynaptic nicotinic cholinergic receptors labeled by [3H]acetylcholine on catecholamine and serotonin axons in brain. J. Neurochem. 42, 1495–1498 (1984).
Reuben, M. & Clarke, P. B. Nicotine-evoked [3H]5-hydroxytryptamine release from rat striatal synaptosomes. Neuropharmacology 39, 290–299 (2000).
Takahashi, H., Takada, Y., Nagai, N., Urano, T. & Takada, A. Nicotine increases stress-induced serotonin release by stimulating nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in rat striatum. Synap. N. Y. N. 28, 212–219 (1998).
Mosko, S. S., Haubrich, D. & Jacobs, B. L. Serotonergic afferents to the dorsal raphe nucleus: evdience from HRP and synaptosomal uptake studies. Brain Res 119, 269–290 (1977).
Waselus, M., Galvez, J. P., Valentino, R. J. & Van Bockstaele, E. J. Differential projections of dorsal raphe nucleus neurons to the lateral septum and striatum. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 31, 233–242 (2006).
Huang, K. W. et al. Molecular and anatomical organization of the dorsal raphe nucleus. eLife 8, e46464 (2019).
Vertes, R. P. A PHA-L analysis of ascending projections of the dorsal raphe nucleus in the rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 313, 643–668 (1991).
Deng, F. et al. Improved green and red GRAB sensors for monitoring spatiotemporal serotonin release in vivo. Nat. Methods 21, 692–702 (2024).
Zhou, F. M., Liang, Y. & Dani, J. A. Endogenous nicotinic cholinergic activity regulates dopamine release in the striatum. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 1224–1229 (2001).
De Groote, L., Olivier, B. & Westenberg, H. G. M. Role of 5-HT1B receptors in the regulation of extracellular serotonin and dopamine in the dorsal striatum of mice. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 476, 71–77 (2003).
Collins, H. M. et al. Rebound activation of 5-HT neurons following SSRI discontinuation. Neuropsychopharmacol 49, 1580–1589 (2024).
Barton, C. L. & Hutson, P. H. Inhibition of hippocampal 5-HT synthesis by fluoxetine and paroxetine: evidence for the involvement of both 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B/D autoreceptors. Synap. N. Y. N. 31, 13–19 (1999).
Ogren, S. O., Ross, S. B., Hall, H., Holm, A. C. & Renyi, A. L. The pharmacology of zimelidine: a 5-HT selective reuptake inhibitor. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. Suppl. 290, 127–151 (1981).
Fuller, R. W., Perry, K. W. & Molloy, B. B. Effect of an uptake inhibitor on serotonin metabolism in rat brain: studies with 3-(p-trifluoromethylphenoxy)-N-methyl-3-phenylpropylamine (Lilly 110140). Life Sci. 15, 1161–1171 (1974).
Brown, P. & Molliver, M. E. Dual Serotonin (5-HT) projections to the nucleus accumbens core and shell: relation of the 5-HT transporter to amphetamine-induced neurotoxicity. J. Neurosci. 20, 1952–1963 (2000).
Soghomonian, J. J., Doucet, G. & Descarries, L. Serotonin innervation in adult rat neostriatum. I. Quantified regional distribution. Brain Res. 425, 85–100 (1987).
Koós, T. & Tepper, J. M. Dual cholinergic control of fast-spiking interneurons in the neostriatum. J. Neurosci. 22, 529–535 (2002).
Lee, C.-H. & Hung, S.-Y. Physiologic functions and therapeutic applications of α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor in brain disorders. Pharmaceutics 15, 31 (2022).
Goldberg, J. A., Ding, J. B. & Surmeier, D. J. Muscarinic modulation of striatal function and circuitry. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23274-9_10 (2012).
Abudukeyoumu, N., Hernandez-Flores, T., Garcia-Munoz, M. & Arbuthnott, G. W. Cholinergic modulation of striatal microcircuits. Eur. J. Neurosci. 49, 604–622 (2019).
Zhou, F.-M. et al. Corelease of dopamine and serotonin from striatal dopamine terminals. Neuron 46, 65–74 (2005).
Malgady, J. M. et al. Pathway-specific alterations in striatal excitability and cholinergic modulation in a SAPAP3 mouse model of compulsive motor behavior. Cell Rep. 42, 113384 (2023).
Wood, J., LaPalombara, Z. & Ahmari, S. E. Monoamine abnormalities in the SAPAP3 knockout model of obsessive-compulsive disorder-related behaviour. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 373, 20170023 (2018).
Matamales, M., Götz, J. & Bertran-Gonzalez, J. Quantitative imaging of cholinergic interneurons reveals a distinctive spatial organization and a functional gradient across the mouse striatum. PLoS ONE 11, e0157682 (2016).
Hobel, Z. B. et al. Striatal cholinergic interneurons exhibit compartment-specific anatomical and functional organization in the mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 123, e2519939123 (2026).
Ren, J. et al. Single-cell transcriptomes and whole-brain projections of serotonin neurons in the mouse dorsal and median raphe nuclei. eLife 8, e49424 (2019).
Bonsi, P. et al. Endogenous serotonin excites striatal cholinergic interneurons via the activation of 5-HT 2C, 5-HT6, and 5-HT7 serotonin receptors: implications for extrapyramidal side effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Neuropsychopharmacol 32, 1840–1854 (2007).
Bouabid, S. et al. Distinct spatially organized striatum-wide acetylcholine dynamics for the learning and extinction of Pavlovian associations. Nat. Commun. 16, 5169 (2025).
Sarpong, G. A. et al. Spatially heterogeneous acetylcholine dynamics in the striatum promote behavioral flexibility. Nat. Commun. 16, 10877 (2025).
Brazell, M. P., Mitchell, S. N., Joseph, M. H. & Gray, J. A. Acute administration of nicotine increases the in vivo extracellular levels of dopamine, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and ascorbic acid preferentially in the nucleus accumbens of the rat: comparison with caudate-putamen. Neuropharmacology 29, 1177–1185 (1990).
Mamaligas, A. A., Cai, Y. & Ford, C. P. Nicotinic and opioid receptor regulation of striatal dopamine D2-receptor mediated transmission. Sci. Rep. 6, 37834 (2016).
Flink, D. R., Faturos, N. G., Zhang, H. & Hamid, A. A. Dual cholinergic mechanisms for sculpting striatal dopamine in vivo. BioRxiv 2025.12.19.695021. https://doi.org/10.64898/2025.12.19.695021 (2025).
Taniguchi, J. et al. Comment on ‘Accumbens cholinergic interneurons dynamically promote dopamine release and enable motivation. eLife 13, e95694 (2024).
Chantranupong, L. et al. Dopamine and glutamate regulate striatal acetylcholine in decision-making. Nature 621, 577–585 (2023).
Shin, J. H., Adrover, M. F. & Alvarez, V. A. Distinctive Modulation of Dopamine Release in the Nucleus Accumbens Shell Mediated by Dopamine and Acetylcholine Receptors. J. Neurosci. 37, 11166–11180 (2017).
Touponse, G. C. et al. Cholinergic modulation of dopamine release drives effortful behaviour. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-10046-6 (2026).
Adrover, M. F. et al. Prefrontal cortex-driven dopamine signals in the striatum show unique spatial and pharmacological properties. J. Neurosci. 40, 7510–7522 (2020).
Zhang, Y.-F. et al. An axonal brake on striatal dopamine output by cholinergic interneurons. Nat. Neurosci. 28, 783–794 (2025).
Ding, J. B., Guzman, J. N., Peterson, J. D., Goldberg, J. A. & Surmeier, D. J. Thalamic gating of corticostriatal signaling by cholinergic interneurons. Neuron 67, 294–307 (2010).
Goldberg, J. A. & Reynolds, J. N. J. Spontaneous firing and evoked pauses in the tonically active cholinergic interneurons of the striatum. Neuroscience 198, 27–43 (2011).
Schulz, J. M., Oswald, M. J. & Reynolds, J. N. J. Visual-induced excitation leads to firing pauses in striatal cholinergic interneurons. J. Neurosci. 31, 11133–11143 (2011).
Shin, J. H. et al. Local Regulation of striatal dopamine release shifts from predominantly cholinergic in mice to GABAergic in macaques. J. Neurosci. 45, e1692242025 (2025).
Honig, G., Jongsma, M. E., van der Hart, M. C. G. & Tecott, L. H. Chronic citalopram administration causes a sustained suppression of serotonin synthesis in the mouse forebrain. PloS One 4, e6797 (2009).
Barbeau, A. The pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease: a new hypothesis. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 87, 802 (1962).
Bédard, C. et al. Serotonin and dopamine striatal innervation in Parkinson’s disease and Huntington’s chorea. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 17, 593–598 (2011).
Sellnow, R. C. et al. Regulation of dopamine neurotransmission from serotonergic neurons by ectopic expression of the dopamine D2 autoreceptor blocks levodopa-induced dyskinesia. Acta Neuropathol. Commun. 7, 8 (2019).
Choi, S. J. et al. Alterations in the intrinsic properties of striatal cholinergic interneurons after dopamine lesion and chronic L-DOPA. eLife 9, e56920 (2020).
Tubert, C., Paz, R. M., Stahl, A. M., Rela, L. & Murer, M. G. Striatal cholinergic interneuron pause response requires Kv1 channels, is absent in dyskinetic mice, and is restored by dopamine D5 receptor inverse agonism. eLife 13, 102184 (2024).
Atamna, Y. et al. Levodopa disrupts activity patterns and encoding of movement in striatal cholinergic interneurons of behaving mice. Mov. Disord. 40, 2457–2468 (2025).
Heinz, A., Schlagenhauf, F., Beck, A. & Wackerhagen, C. Dimensional psychiatry: mental disorders as dysfunctions of basic learning mechanisms. J. Neural Transm. 123, 809–821 (2016).
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by grants from the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation (no. 2021212) to J.LP. and J.A.G, from the Israel Science Foundation (no. 1959/22) to J.A.G and from NIH (NS 104089) and The Hartman Center to J.L.P. We would like to thank Prof. Ayal Ben-Zvi and Dr. Eran Lottem for valuable discussions; and Anatoly Shapochnikov and Drs. Yael Feinstein-Rotkopf and Tamar Licht and for excellent technical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, L.M., J.L.P., and J.A.G.; Methodology, L.M., Z.B.H., J.M.M., J.L.P., and J.A.G.; Software, L.M. and J.A.G.; Validation, L.M., Z.B.H., J.M.M., J.L.P., and J.A.G.; Analysis, L.M., Z.B.H., J.M.M., N.G., N.B., J.L.P., and J.A.G.; Resources, J.A.G.; Data Curation, L.M., Z.B.H., J.M.M., N.G., and N.B.; Writing, L.M., J.L.P., and J.A.G.; Visualization, L.M., Z.B.H., J.M.M., J.L.P., and J.A.G.; Supervision, J.L.P. and J.A.G.; Project Administration and Funding Acquisition, J.L.P. and J.A.G.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Mariana Duhne Aguayo, Alexander Friedman and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Matityahu, L., Hobel, Z.B., Berkowitz, N. et al. Synchronous activation of striatal cholinergic interneurons induces local serotonin release. Nat Commun 17, 2278 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70359-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70359-6





