Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
Ultrasmall oral Saccharibacteria modulate gingival immunoactivation through type IV pili and TLR2-dependent endocytosis
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 28 March 2026

Ultrasmall oral Saccharibacteria modulate gingival immunoactivation through type IV pili and TLR2-dependent endocytosis

  • Deepak Chouhan  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3749-02801,
  • Alex S. Grossman1,
  • Kristopher A. Kerns  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-4380-00622,
  • Kendall S. Stocke3,
  • Maya Kim1,
  • Pu-Ting Dong  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2818-20211,
  • Ajay Kumar1,
  • Lei Lei1,4,
  • Richard J. Lamont  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3147-50393,
  • Jeffrey S. McLean  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9934-51372,5,6,
  • Xuesong He  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3333-91881 &
  • …
  • Batbileg Bor  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-17301 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 858 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cellular microbiology
  • Chemokines
  • Inhibitory RNA techniques
  • Innate immunity
  • Mucosal immunology

Abstract

Saccharibacteria are ultrasmall episymbionts that require host-bacteria to grow. They are positively associated with inflammatory diseases within the human microbiome, yet their mechanisms for interacting with the human host and contributing to diseases remain unknown. This study investigated the tripartite interactions between Saccharibacteria (Nanosynbacter lyticus strain TM7x and other strains), their host/non-host-bacteria, and human oral gingival epithelial cells. Both host and non-host-bacteria strongly induce proinflammatory cytokines in epithelial cells, while Saccharibacteria alone elicits limited immune activation. Remarkably, Saccharibacteria dampened proinflammatory cytokine responses to host/non-host-bacteria during coinfection. Mechanistically, this effect results from Saccharibacteria-mediated clustering and endocytosis of surface TLR2 receptor, ultimately leading to reduce TLR2-mediated cytokine signalling. Sacchribacteria type IV pili appendages facilitate epithelial cell binding and subsequent immune dampening via direct interaction between pili adhesins and TLR2. High resolution imaging shows that Saccharibacteria are internalized by epithelial cells through caveolin-mediated endocytosis, subsequently colocalize with endosome markers, and eventually are trafficked to lysosomes for degradation. Moreover, a subset of the Saccharibacteria survives lysosomal degradation and retains the ability to reinfect host-bacteria, highlighting a mechanism for transient persistence in the oral microbiome and a vital role in human immune and microbiome modulation.

Similar content being viewed by others

Revealing an unprecedented diversity of episymbiotic Saccharibacteria in a high-quality genome collection

Article Open access 19 December 2024

Physiologically relevant coculture model for oral microbial-host interactions

Article Open access 27 May 2025

Polybacterial intracellular macromolecules shape single-cell inflammatory profiles in upper airway epithelia

Article Open access 10 June 2025

Material availability

All unique reagents and bacterial strains generated in this study are available from the lead contact upon completion of a Material Transfer Agreement.

Data availability

All the data that support the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary files. The raw RNA sequencing data are deposited in GEO under the accession number GSE296366. Source data are provided with this article. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

No custom codes were generated in this study. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Hug, L. A. et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16048 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Srinivas, P., Peterson, S. B., Gallagher, L. A., Wang, Y. & Mougous, J. D. Beyond genomics in Patescibacteria: A trove of unexplored biology packed into ultrasmall bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2419369121 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. He, C. et al. Genome-resolved metagenomics reveals site-specific diversity of episymbiotic CPR bacteria and DPANN archaea in groundwater ecosystems. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 354–365 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Danczak, R. E. et al. Members of the Candidate Phyla radiation are functionally differentiated by carbon- and nitrogen-cycling capabilities. Microbiome 5, 112 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parks, D. H. et al. Recovery of nearly 8000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1533–1542 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Naud, S. et al. Candidate Phyla radiation, an underappreciated division of the human microbiome, and its impact on health and disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 35, e0014021 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jaffe, A. L. et al. Patterns of gene content and co-occurrence constrain the evolutionary path toward animal association in Candidate Phyla radiation bacteria. mBio 12, e00521-21 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. McLean, J. S. et al. Acquisition and adaptation of ultra-small parasitic reduced genome bacteria to mammalian hosts. Cell Rep. 32, 107939 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suh, J.-Y., Spyracopoulos, L., Keizer, D. W., Irvin, R. T. & Sykes, B. D. Backbone dynamics of receptor binding and antigenic regions of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa pilin monomer. Biochemistry 40, 3985–3995 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bor, B., Bedree, J. K., Shi, W., McLean, J. S. & He, X. Saccharibacteria (TM7) in the human oral microbiome. J. Dent. Res. 98, 500–509 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. He, X. et al. Cultivation of a human-associated TM7 phylotype reveals a reduced genome and epibiotic parasitic lifestyle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 244–249 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cross, K. L. et al. Targeted isolation and cultivation of uncultivated bacteria by reverse genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1314–1321 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Xie, B. et al. Type IV pili trigger episymbiotic association of Saccharibacteria with its bacterial host. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2215990119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Qi, Y. et al. High-throughput sequencing provides insights into oral microbiota dysbiosis in association with inflammatory bowel disease. Genomics 113, 664–676 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Łaniewski, P. & Herbst-Kralovetz, M. M. Bacterial vaginosis and health-associated bacteria modulate the immunometabolic landscape in 3D model of human cervix. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes 7, 88 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baker, J. L., Mark Welch, J. L., Kauffman, K. M., McLean, J. S. & He, X. The oral microbiome: diversity, biogeography and human health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 89–104 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xiang, B., Hu, J., Zhang, M. & Zhi, M. The involvement of oral bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol. Rep. 12, goae076 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kerns, K. A. et al. Localized microbially induced inflammation influences distant healthy tissues in the human oral cavity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2306020120 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bamashmous, S. et al. Human variation in gingival inflammation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2012578118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chipashvili, O. et al. Episymbiotic Saccharibacteria suppresses gingival inflammation and bone loss in mice through host bacterial modulation. Cell Host Microbe 29, 1649–1662.e7 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Beam, J. P. et al. Ancestral absence of electron transport chains in patescibacteria and DPANN. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1848 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Castelle, C. J. et al. Biosynthetic capacity, metabolic variety and unusual biology in the CPR and DPANN radiations. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 629–645 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Castelle, C. J. & Banfield, J. F. Major new microbial groups expand diversity and alter our understanding of the tree of life. Cell 172, 1181–1197 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jaffe, A. L., Castelle, C. J., Matheus Carnevali, P. B., Gribaldo, S. & Banfield, J. F. The rise of diversity in metabolic platforms across the Candidate Phyla radiation. BMC Biol. 18, 69 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhong, Q. et al. Episymbiotic Saccharibacteria TM7x modulates the susceptibility of its host bacteria to phage infection and promotes their coexistence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 121, e2319790121 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lamont, R. J. Three’s a crowd: Saccharibacteria episymbiosis modulates phage predation of host bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2405822121 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Grossman, A. S. et al. Saccharibacteria deploy two distinct type IV pili, driving episymbiosis, host competition, and twitching motility. ISME J 19, wraf119 (2025).

  28. Sharma, V., Von Ossowski, I. & Krishnan, V. Exploiting pilus-mediated bacteria-host interactions for health benefits. Mol. Asp. Med. 81, 100998 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Singh, P. K., Little, J. & Donnenberg, M. S. Landmark discoveries and recent advances in type iv pilus research. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 86, e0007622 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nieto, V. et al. Type Iv pili can mediate bacterial motility within epithelial cells. mBio 10, e02880-18 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Melville, S. & Craig, L. Type IV pili in gram-positive bacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 77, 323–341 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shi, W. & Sun, H. Type IV pilus-dependent motility and its possible role in bacterial pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 70, 1–4 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sugawara, S., Uehara, A., Tamai, R. & Takada, H. Innate immune responses in oral mucosa. J. Endotoxin Res. 8, 465–468 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dutzan, N. et al. On-going mechanical damage from mastication drives homeostatic Th17 cell responses at the oral barrier. Immunity 46, 133–147 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Groeger, S. & Meyle, J. Oral mucosal epithelial cells. Front. Immunol. 10, 208 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Moutsopoulos, N. M. & Konkel, J. E. Tissue-specific immunity at the oral mucosal barrier. Trends Immunol. 39, 276–287 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Jang, J.-H. et al. An overview of pathogen recognition receptors for innate immunity in dental pulp. Mediators Inflamm. 2015, 794143 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Ross, K. F. & Herzberg, M. C. Autonomous immunity in mucosal epithelial cells: fortifying the barrier against infection. Microbes Infect. 18, 387–398 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yin, L. et al. Differential and coordinated expression of defensins and cytokines by gingival epithelial cells and dendritic cells in response to oral bacteria. BMC Immunol. 11, 37 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Shi, C. & Pamer, E. G. Monocyte recruitment during infection and inflammation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 762–774 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Li, D. & Wu, M. Pattern recognition receptors in health and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 291 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Naud, S. et al. Preliminary landscape of Candidatus Saccharibacteria in the human microbiome. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 13, 1195679 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dewhirst, F. E. et al. The human oral microbiome. J. Bacteriol. 192, 5002–5017 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Könönen, E. & Wade, W. G. Actinomyces and related organisms in human infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 28, 419–442 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Breau, K. A. Actinomyces odontolyticus: from carries to colorectal cancer. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 879–880 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Khurshid, Z. et al. Oral antimicrobial peptides: types and role in the oral cavity. Saudi Pharm. J. 24, 515–524 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dale, B. A. & Fredericks, L. P. Antimicrobial peptides in the oral environment: expression and function in health and disease. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 7, 119–133 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hans, M. & Madaan Hans, V. Epithelial antimicrobial peptides: guardian of the oral cavity. Int. J. Pept. 2014, 1–13 (2014).

  49. McCarron, R. M., Fitzgerald, J. E. & Birdsell, D. C. Role of macrophages in the lymphocyte response to Actinomyces viscosus. Infect. Immun. 38, 623–630 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Suzuki, I., Shimizu, T. & Senpuku, H. Short chain fatty acids induced the type 1 and type 2 fimbrillin-dependent and fimbrillin-independent initial attachment and colonization of Actinomyces oris monoculture but not coculture with streptococci. BMC Microbiol. 20, 329 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shimada, E., Kataoka, H., Miyazawa, Y., Yamamoto, M. & Igarashi, T. Lipoproteins of actinomyces viscosus induce inflammatory responses through TLR2 in human gingival epithelial cells and macrophages. Microbes Infect. 14, 916–921 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Koning, M. & van de Gevel, J. Actinomycosis. in StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, 2025).

  53. Vielkind, P., Jentsch, H., Eschrich, K., Rodloff, A. C. & Stingu, C.-S. Prevalence of Actinomyces spp. in patients with chronic periodontitis. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 305, 682–688 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Cone, L. A., Leung, M. M. & Hirschberg, J. Actinomyces Odontolyticus Bacteremia. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 9, 1629–1632 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Miyakawa, Y. et al. Gut bacteria-derived membrane vesicles induce colonic dysplasia by inducing DNA damage in colon epithelial cells. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17, 745–767 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lee, J. S. & Yilmaz, Ö Key elements of gingival epithelial homeostasis upon bacterial interaction. J. Dent. Res. 100, 333–340 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Zubeidat, K. & Hovav, A.-H. Shaped by the epithelium – postnatal immune mechanisms of oral homeostasis. Trends Immunol. 42, 622–634 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Li, Y., Mooney, E. C., Xia, X.-J., Gupta, N. & Sahingur, S. E. A20 restricts inflammatory response and desensitizes gingival keratinocytes to apoptosis. Front. Immunol. 11, 365 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Moffatt-Jauregui, C. E. et al. Establishment and characterization of a telomerase immortalized human gingival epithelial cell line. J. Periodontal Res. 48, 713–721 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Zhou, Y. et al. Noncanonical activation of β-catenin by porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect. Immun. 83, 3195–3203 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Rodriguez-Hernandez, C. J. et al. Microbiome-mediated incapacitation of interferon lambda production in the oral mucosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e2105170118 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Golda, A. et al. Organotypic model of the gingiva for studying bacterial and viral pathogens implicated in periodontitis. J. Oral. Microbiol. 16, 2292382 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Fitzsimonds, Z. R. et al. Regulation of olfactomedin 4 by Porphyromonas gingivalis in a community context. ISME J. 15, 2627–2642 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hawkes, C. G. et al. Selenomonas sputigena interactions with gingival epithelial cells that promote inflammation. Infect. Immun. 91, e0031922 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Bor, B. et al. Phenotypic and physiological characterization of the epibiotic interaction between TM7x and its basibiont actinomyces. Microb. Ecol. 71, 243–255 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bor, B. et al. Rapid evolution of decreased host susceptibility drives a stable relationship between ultrasmall parasite TM7x and its bacterial host. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, 12277–12282 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Li, Y.-M., Zhang, J., Su, L.-J., Kellum, J. A. & Peng, Z.-Y. Downregulation of TIMP2 attenuates sepsis-induced AKI through the NF-κb pathway. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA - Mol. Basis Dis. 1865, 558–569 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Lee, E.-J. & Kim, H.-S. The anti-inflammatory role of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated microglia. J. Neuroinflamm. 11, 116 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Folorunso, O. S. et al. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 promotes wound healing by suppressing matrix metalloproteinases and inflammatory cytokines in corneal epithelial cells. Am. J. Pathol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2024.11.007 (2024).

  70. Castilho, R. M. et al. Rac1 is required for epithelial stem cell function during dermal and oral mucosal wound healing but not for tissue homeostasis in mice. PLoS ONE 5, e10503 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Martin, D. et al. The head and neck cancer cell oncogenome: a platform for the development of precision molecular therapies. Oncotarget 5, 8906–8923 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Vestman, N. R. et al. Characterization and in vitro properties of oral lactobacilli in breastfed infants. BMC Microbiol. 13, 193 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Saitoh, Y., Yonekura, N., Matsuoka, D. & Matsumoto, A. Molecular hydrogen suppresses Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide-induced increases in interleukin-1 alpha and interleukin-6 secretion in human gingival cells. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 477, 99–104 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Cvikl, B., Lussi, A., Moritz, A., Sculean, A. & Gruber, R. Sterile-filtered saliva is a strong inducer of IL-6 and IL-8 in oral fibroblasts. Clin. Oral. Investig. 19, 385–399 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Engelhardt, E. et al. Chemokines IL-8, GROα, MCP-1, IP-10, and Mig are sequentially and differentially expressed during phase-specific infiltration of leukocyte subsets in human wound healing. Am. J. Pathol. 153, 1849–1860 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Mukaida, N., Harada, A. & Matsushima, K. Interleukin-8 (IL-8) and monocyte chemotactic and activating factor (MCAF/MCP-1), chemokines essentially involved in inflammatory and immune reactions. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 9, 9–23 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Imdahl, F. & Saliba, A.-E. Advances and challenges in single-cell RNA-seq of microbial communities. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 57, 102–110 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  78. McNulty, R. et al. Probe-based bacterial single-cell RNA sequencing predicts toxin regulation. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 934–945 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Homberger, C., Barquist, L. & Vogel, J. Ushering in a new era of single-cell transcriptomics in bacteria. microLife 3, uqac020 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2025: protein networks with directionality of regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D730–D737 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Cai, Z., Mao, X., Li, S. & Wei, L. Genome comparison using Gene Ontology (GO) with statistical testing. BMC Bioinforma. 7, 374 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Feng, Y. et al. A toll-like receptor agonist mimicking microbial signal to generate tumor-suppressive macrophages. Nat. Commun. 10, 2272 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Parra-Izquierdo, I. et al. The toll-like receptor 2 ligand Pam2CSK4 activates platelet nuclear factor-κB and Bruton’s tyrosine kinase signaling to promote platelet-endothelial cell interactions. Front. Immunol. 12, 729951 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Farhat, K. et al. Heterodimerization of TLR2 with TLR1 or TLR6 expands the ligand spectrum but does not lead to differential signaling. J. Leukoc. Biol. 83, 692–701 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Whitehead, K. A., Langer, R. & Anderson, D. G. Knocking down barriers: advances in siRNA delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 8, 129–138 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Kawai, T. & Akira, S. Signaling to NF-κB by Toll-like receptors. Trends Mol. Med. 13, 460–469 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Brandt, K. J., Fickentscher, C., Kruithof, E. K. O. & de Moerloose, P. TLR2 ligands induce NF-κB activation from endosomal compartments of human monocytes. PloS One 8, e80743 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Hou, A., Tin, M. Q. & Tong, L. Toll-like receptor 2-mediated NF-kappa B pathway activation in ocular surface epithelial cells. Eye Vis. 4, 17 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  89. Bor, B. et al. Insights obtained by culturing saccharibacteria with their bacterial hosts. J. Dent. Res. 99, 685–694 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Chazotte, B. Labeling mitochondria with MitoTracker dyes. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2011, pdb.prot5648 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Maslov, I. et al. Efficient non-cytotoxic fluorescent staining of halophiles. Sci. Rep. 8, 2549 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Schneider, D., Fuhrmann, E., Scholz, I., Hess, W. R. & Graumann, P. L. Fluorescence staining of live cyanobacterial cells suggest non-stringent chromosome segregation and absence of a connection between cytoplasmic and thylakoid membranes. BMC Cell Biol. 8, 39 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Al-Attar, A. et al. Activation of Notch-1 in oral epithelial cells by P. gingivalis triggers the expression of the antimicrobial protein PLA2-IIA. Mucosal Immunol. 11, 1047–1059 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Wang, Y. et al. Genetic manipulation of Patescibacteria provides mechanistic insights into microbial dark matter and the epibiotic lifestyle. Cell 186, 4803–4817.e13 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Musilova, J., Mulcahy, M. E., Kuijk, M. M., McLoughlin, R. M. & Bowie, A. G. Toll-like receptor 2-dependent endosomal signaling by Staphylococcus aureus in monocytes induces type I interferon and promotes intracellular survival. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 17031–17042 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Oliveira-Nascimento, L., Massari, P. & Wetzler, L. M. The Role of TLR2 in Infection and Immunity. Front. Immunol. 3, 79 (2012).

  97. Boslaugh, S. & Watters, P. Statistics in a Nutshell: A Desktop Quick Reference (O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2009).

  98. Daims, H., Lücker, S. & Wagner, M. daime, a novel image analysis program for microbial ecology and biofilm research. Environ. Microbiol. 8, 200–213 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Meng, G. et al. Antagonistic antibody prevents toll-like receptor 2-driven lethal shock-like syndromes. J. Clin. Invest. 113, 1473–1481 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Wang, X. et al. Blocking TLR2 activity diminishes and stabilizes advanced atherosclerotic lesions in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 34, 1025–1035 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Piepenbrink, K. H. & Sundberg, E. J. Motility and adhesion through type IV pili in Gram-positive bacteria. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 44, 1659–1666 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Denise, R., Abby, S. S. & Rocha, E. P. C. Diversification of the type IV filament superfamily into machines for adhesion, protein secretion, DNA uptake, and motility. PLOS Biol. 17, e3000390 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Takahashi, R., Radcliff, F. J., Proft, T. & Tsai, C. J.-Y. Pilus proteins from Streptococcus pyogenes stimulate innate immune responses through Toll-like receptor 2. Immunol. Cell Biol. 100, 174–185 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Lorenz, E., Chemotti, D. C., Vandal, K. & Tessier, P. A. Toll-like receptor 2 represses nonpilus adhesin-induced signaling in acute infections with the Pseudomonas aeruginosa pilA mutant. Infect. Immun. 72, 4561–4569 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Lambe, D. W. Glycocalyx of bacteroides and Staphylococcus. Role in mixed infections. Méd. Mal. Infect. 20, 33–36 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Tang, B. L. Bacteria-containing vacuoles: subversion of cellular membrane traffic and autophagy. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 25, 163–174 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Draper, P. & Rees, R. J. Electron-transparent zone of mycobacteria may be a defence mechanism. Nature 228, 860–861 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Fassel, T. A. & Edmiston, C. E. Evaluating Adherent Bacteria and Biofilm Using Electron Microscopy. in Handbook of Bacterial Adhesion (eds An, Y. H. & Friedman, R. J.) 235–248 (Humana Press, 2000).

  109. Levine, B., Mizushima, N. & Virgin, H. W. Autophagy in immunity and inflammation. Nature 469, 323–335 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Settembre, C., Fraldi, A., Medina, D. L. & Ballabio, A. Signals from the lysosome: a control centre for cellular clearance and energy metabolism. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 283–296 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Mu, F. T. et al. EEA1, an early endosome-associated protein. EEA1 is a conserved alpha-helical peripheral membrane protein flanked by cysteine ‘fingers’ and contains a calmodulin-binding IQ motif. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 13503–13511 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Wilson, J. M. et al. EEA1, a tethering protein of the early sorting endosome, shows a polarized distribution in hippocampal neurons, epithelial cells, and fibroblasts. Mol. Biol. Cell 11, 2657–2671 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Kamentseva, R. et al. Functional cycle of EEA1-positive early endosome: direct evidence for pre-existing compartment of degradative pathway. PLOS One 15, e0232532 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Rennick, J. J., Johnston, A. P. R. & Parton, R. G. Key principles and methods for studying the endocytosis of biological and nanoparticle therapeutics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 266–276 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Sato, K., Nagai, J., Mitsui, N., Yumoto, R. & Takano, M. Effects of endocytosis inhibitors on internalization of human IgG by Caco-2 human intestinal epithelial cells. Life Sci. 85, 800–807 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Delvecchio, R. et al. Chloroquine, an endocytosis blocking agent, inhibits zika virus infection in different cell models. Viruses 8, 322 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  117. McCluskey, A. et al. Building a better dynasore: the dyngo compounds potently inhibit dynamin and endocytosis. Traffic 14, 1272–1289 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Zhu, X.-D. et al. Caveolae-dependent endocytosis is required for class A macrophage scavenger receptor-mediated apoptosis in macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 8231–8239 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Xu, Y., Cao, X., Zhang, S., Zhang, Y. & Shen, Z. High expression of LAMP1 as a prognostic marker in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 10, 9104–9111 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Janvier, K. & Bonifacino, J. S. Role of the endocytic machinery in the sorting of lysosome-associated membrane proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 4231–4242 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  121. Jensen, S. S., Aaberg-Jessen, C., Christensen, K. G. & Kristensen, B. Expression of the lysosomal-associated membrane protein-1 (LAMP-1) in astrocytomas. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 6, 1294–1305 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  122. Tanida, I., Ueno, T. & Kominami, E. LC3 and autophagy. in Autophagosome and Phagosome Vol. 445 (ed. Deretic, V.) 77–88 (Humana Press, 2008).

  123. Runwal, G. et al. LC3-positive structures are prominent in autophagy-deficient cells. Sci. Rep. 9, 10147 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Jones, K. B. et al. Quantitative clonal analysis and single-cell transcriptomics reveal division kinetics, hierarchy, and fate of oral epithelial progenitor cells. Cell Stem Cell 24, 183–192.e8 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  125. Aidoukovitch, A., Bodahl, S., Tufvesson, E. & Nilsson, B.-O. Desquamated epithelial cells of unstimulated human whole saliva express both EGF transcript and protein. Int. J. Dent. 2022, 1–9 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  126. Lee, E.-J. et al. Mechanical regulation of oral epithelial barrier function. Bioengineering 10, 517 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  127. Hornef, M. W., Wick, M. J., Rhen, M. & Normark, S. Bacterial strategies for overcoming host innate and adaptive immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 3, 1033–1040 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  128. Park, N. J., Li, Y., Yu, T., Brinkman, B. M. N. & Wong, D. T. Characterization of RNA in saliva. Clin. Chem. 52, 988–994 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Peng, X. et al. Oral microbiota in human systematic diseases. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 14, 14 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  130. Hajishengallis, G., Lamont, R. J. & Koo, H. Oral polymicrobial communities: assembly, function, and impact on diseases. Cell Host Microbe 31, 528–538 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  131. Lamont, R. J., Koo, H. & Hajishengallis, G. The oral microbiota: dynamic communities and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 745–759 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  132. Zha, Y., Chong, H., Yang, P. & Ning, K. Microbial dark matter: from discovery to applications. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 20, 867–881 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  133. Miyoshi, J., Rao, M. C. & Chang, E. B. Navigating the human gut microbiome: pathway to success from lessons learned. Gastroenterology 159, 2019–2024 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Solden, L., Lloyd, K. & Wrighton, K. The bright side of microbial dark matter: lessons learned from the uncultivated majority. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 31, 217–226 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  135. Keestra-Gounder, A. M. & Nagao, P. E. Inflammasome activation by Gram-positive bacteria: Mechanisms of activation and regulation. Front. Immunol. 14, 1075834 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  136. He, W. et al. Revealing an unprecedented diversity of episymbiotic Saccharibacteria in a high-quality genome collection. Npj Biofilms Microbiomes 10, 18 (2024).

  137. Figueroa-Gonzalez, P. A. et al. Saccharibacteria as organic carbon sinks in hydrocarbon-fueled communities. Front. Microbiol. 11, 584501 (2020).

  138. Peyyala, R., Kirakodu, S. S., Novak, K. F. & Ebersole, J. L. Oral microbial biofilm stimulation of epithelial cell responses. Cytokine 58, 65–72 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  139. Forbes, J. D. et al. A comparative study of the gut microbiota in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases—does a common dysbiosis exist? Microbiome 6, 221 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  140. Sanderlin, A. G. et al. RNAi screen reveals a role for PACSIN2 and caveolins during bacterial cell-to-cell spread. Mol. Biol. Cell 30, 2124–2133 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  141. Kumari, S., Mg, S. & Mayor, S. Endocytosis unplugged: multiple ways to enter the cell. Cell Res. 20, 256–275 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  142. Saito, A. et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis entry into gingival epithelial cells modulated by Fusobacterium nucleatum is dependent on lipid rafts. Microb. Pathog. 53, 234–242 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  143. Tribble, G. D. & Lamont, R. J. Bacterial invasion of epithelial cells and spreading in periodontal tissue. Periodontol 2000 52, 68–83 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  144. Pizarro-Cerdá, J. & Cossart, P. Bacterial Adhesion and Entry into Host Cells. Cell 124, 715–727 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  145. Dorn, B. R., Leung, K. L. & Progulske-Fox, A. Invasion of human oral epithelial cells by Prevotella intermedia. Infect. Immun. 66, 6054–6057 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  146. Meyer, D. H., Mintz, K. P. & Fives-Taylor, P. M. Models of invasion of enteric and periodontal pathogens into epithelial cells: a comparative analysis. Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med. 8, 389–409 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  147. Zheng, K., He, F. B., Liu, H. & He, Q. Genetic variations of toll-like receptors: impact on susceptibility, severity and prognosis of bacterial meningitis. Infect. Genet. Evol. 93, 104984 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  148. Basset, A. et al. Toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 mediates inflammatory responses to oligomerized RrgA pneumococcal pilus type 1 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 2665–2675 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  149. Into, T., Inomata, M., Takayama, E. & Takigawa, T. Autophagy in regulation of Toll-like receptor signaling. Cell. Signal. 24, 1150–1162 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  150. Huang, J. & Brumell, J. H. Bacteria–autophagy interplay: a battle for survival. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 101–114 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  151. Bourdonnay, E. & Henry, T. Catch me if you can. eLife 5, e14721 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  152. Liu, Y. et al. The interplay between oral microbes and immune responses. Front. Microbiol. 13, 1009018 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  153. Li, Y. et al. Dynamics of oral microbiome acquisition in healthy infants: a pilot study. Front. Oral. Health 4, 1152601 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  154. Dudek, N. K. et al. Novel microbial diversity and functional potential in the marine mammal oral microbiome. Curr. Biol. 27, 3752–3762.e6 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  155. Livak, K. J. & Schmittgen, T. D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25, 402–408 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  156. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  157. Benjamini, Y., Drai, D., Elmer, G., Kafkafi, N. & Golani, I. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav. Brain Res. 125, 279–284 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  158. Zhu, A., Ibrahim, J. G. & Love, M. I. Heavy-tailed prior distributions for sequence count data: removing the noise and preserving large differences. Bioinformatics 35, 2084–2092 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  159. Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2023: protein-protein association networks and functional enrichment analyses for any sequenced genome of interest. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D638–D646 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  160. Wickham, H. Ggplot2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016).

  161. Gu, Z. Complex heatmap visualization. iMeta 1, e43 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  162. Conway, J. R., Lex, A. & Gehlenborg, N. UpSetR: an R package for the visualization of intersecting sets and their properties. Bioinformatics 33, 2938–2940 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  163. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  164. Graham, L. & Orenstein, J. M. Processing tissue and cells for transmission electron microscopy in diagnostic pathology and research. Nat. Protoc. 2, 2439–2450 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  165. Kadurugamuwa, J. L. & Beveridge, T. J. Delivery of the non-membrane-permeative antibiotic gentamicin into mammalian cells by using Shigella flexneri membrane vesicles. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42, 1476–1483 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  166. Sharma, A. & Puhar, A. Gentamicin protection assay to determine the number of intracellular bacteria during infection of human TC7 intestinal epithelial cells by Shigella flexneri. Bio-Protoc. 9, e3292 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by grants from the a under awards 1R01DE031274 (B.B.) 1R01DE023810 (X.H., J.S.M.) and T90 DE026110-07 (A.S.G.). Forsyth Institute Advanced Microscopy Core Facility supported by NIH 1S10OD034405-01 and Harvard Center for Nanoscale Systems (CNS) facilities. We acknowledge Dr. Ning Yu for providing the HGEPp cell line and Lujia Cen for general lab support. Jennifer Gundrum and Kyle Bredin provided technical support with microscopy and flow cytometry. Dr. Mary Ellen Davey and Dr. Hyun Young Kim provided technical support for using the NanoSight.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Microbiology, ADA Forsyth Institute, Somerville, MA, USA

    Deepak Chouhan, Alex S. Grossman, Maya Kim, Pu-Ting Dong, Ajay Kumar, Lei Lei, Xuesong He & Batbileg Bor

  2. Department of Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Kristopher A. Kerns & Jeffrey S. McLean

  3. Department of Oral Immunology and Infectious Diseases, University of Louisville School of Dentistry, Louisville, KY, USA

    Kendall S. Stocke & Richard J. Lamont

  4. West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

    Lei Lei

  5. Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Jeffrey S. McLean

  6. Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Jeffrey S. McLean

Authors
  1. Deepak Chouhan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alex S. Grossman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristopher A. Kerns
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kendall S. Stocke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maya Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pu-Ting Dong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ajay Kumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Lei Lei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Richard J. Lamont
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Jeffrey S. McLean
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xuesong He
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Batbileg Bor
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization by D.C., X.H., J.S.M., and B.B. Data acquisition by D.C., A.S.G., M.K., A.K., and L.L. Methodology by D.C., A.S.G., M.K., K.A.K., K.S.S., P.D., R.J.L., J.S.M., and B.B. Formal analysis by D.C., K.A.K., K.S.S., P.D., R.J.L., J.S.M., X.H., and B.B. Resources provided by R.J.L., J.S.M., X.H., and B.B. Data Curation by K.A.K., K.S.S., and J.S.M. Original draft written by D.C. and B.B. Review and editing by D.C., A.S.G., K.S.S., R.J.L., JSM, X.H., and B.B. Visualization by D.C. Supervision by B.B.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Batbileg Bor.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Yuanqiang Zou, and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 2 (download XLSX )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chouhan, D., Grossman, A.S., Kerns, K.A. et al. Ultrasmall oral Saccharibacteria modulate gingival immunoactivation through type IV pili and TLR2-dependent endocytosis. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70546-5

Download citation

  • Received: 03 July 2025

  • Accepted: 24 February 2026

  • Published: 28 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70546-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology