Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
RNA functional modulation by Mitoxantrone via RNA structural ensemble repartitioning
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 March 2026

RNA functional modulation by Mitoxantrone via RNA structural ensemble repartitioning

  • Chundan Zhang1 na1,
  • Ivana Borovská  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8090-387X1,2 na1,
  • Teona Iobashvili  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0004-2686-55601,
  • Edoardo Morandi1,
  • Marta Lionnez3,
  • Oluwatosin S. Olayinka4,
  • Rinse de Boer5,
  • Massimiliano Clamer6,
  • Martin D. Witte  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4660-29743,
  • Klaus Pors4,
  • John S. Schneekloth Jr.7 &
  • …
  • Danny Incarnato  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3944-23271 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 2908 Accesses

  • 24 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • RNA
  • RNA folding

Abstract

Targeting RNA with small molecules offers a strategy to modulate gene expression at undruggable targets. Traditional screens favor thermodynamically stable, low-entropy RNA motifs with defined conformations, yet these provide limited energetic leverage for functional modulation. Many RNAs instead sample dynamic structural ensembles that small molecules can repartition. Using group I self-splicing introns as a model, we identified the antineoplastic drug Mitoxantrone as a competitive inhibitor of RNA self-splicing (IC50 = 4.3 μM) that stabilizes the native conformation of the T4 td intron. Structure-activity analysis showed that the anthraquinone scaffold alone is insufficient, and basic amine-containing side chains are required for RNA structural modulation. Transcriptome-wide chemical probing in human cells revealed preferential binding to GC-rich structured regions, although only a subset showed structural change. Furthermore, global analysis of 5′ UTR ensembles showed altered structural heterogeneity and translation, demonstrating functional repartitioning of RNA conformational landscapes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Targeting the conserved active site of splicing machines with specific and selective small molecule modulators

Article Open access 19 June 2024

Targeting RNA structures with small molecules

Article 08 August 2022

Nuclear compartmentalization of TERT mRNA and TUG1 lncRNA is driven by intron retention

Article Open access 03 June 2021

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request. Sequencing data have been deposited to the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, under the accession GSE302505. Raw MM files for analysis with DRACO are available from Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15874381). Additional processed data are available at https://www.incarnatolab.com/datasets/Mitoxantrone_Zhang_2026.php. Source data for the figures and Supplementary Figure are provided as a Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The source codes of DRACO v1.3, and of the diffShape utility are freely available from GitHub, under the GPLv3 license (https://github.com/dincarnato/draco and https://github.com/dincarnato/papers).

References

  1. Warner, K. D., Hajdin, C. E. & Weeks, K. M. Principles for targeting RNA with drug-like small molecules. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 17, 547–558 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Childs-Disney, J. L. et al. Targeting RNA structures with small molecules. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 736–762 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hewitt, W. M., Calabrese, D. R. & Schneekloth, J. S. Evidence for ligandable sites in structured RNA throughout the Protein Data Bank. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 27, 2253–2260 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Veenbaas, S. D., Koehn, J. T., Irving, P. S., Lama, N. N. & Weeks, K. M. Ligand-binding pockets in RNA and where to find them. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2422346122 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mustoe, A. M., Brooks, C. L. & Al-Hashimi, H. M. Hierarchy of RNA functional dynamics. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 83, 441–466 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ganser, L. R., Kelly, M. L., Herschlag, D. & Al-Hashimi, H. M. The roles of structural dynamics in the cellular functions of RNAs. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 20, 474–489 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Spitale, R. C. & Incarnato, D. Probing the dynamic RNA structurome and its functions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 24, 178–196 (2023).

  8. Bose, R., Saleem, I. & Mustoe, A. M. Causes, functions, and therapeutic possibilities of RNA secondary structure ensembles and alternative states. Cell Chem. Biol. 31, 17–35 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bonilla, S. L., Jones, A. N. & Incarnato, D. Structural and biophysical dissection of RNA conformational ensembles. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 88, 102908 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Siegfried, N. A., Busan, S., Rice, G. M., Nelson, J. A. E. & Weeks, K. M. RNA motif discovery by SHAPE and mutational profiling (SHAPE-MaP). Nat. Methods 11, 959–965 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mustoe, A. M. et al. Pervasive regulatory functions of mRNA structure revealed by high-resolution SHAPEprobing. Cell 173, 181–195.e18 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Manfredonia, I. et al. Genome-wide mapping of SARS-CoV-2 RNA structures identifies therapeutically-relevant elements. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 12436–12452 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sztuba-Solinska, J., Chavez-Calvillo, G. & Cline, S. E. Unveiling the druggable RNA targets and small molecule therapeutics. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 27, 2149–2165 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Juru, A. U., Patwardhan, N. N. & Hargrove, A. E. Understanding the contributions of conformational changes, thermodynamics, and kinetics of RNA–small molecule interactions. ACS Chem. Biol. 14, 824–838 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ottink, O. M. et al. Ligand-induced folding of the guanine-sensing riboswitch is controlled by a combined predetermined induced fit mechanism. RNA 13, 2202–2212 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Noeske, J. et al. Interplay of ‘induced fit’ and preorganization in the ligand induced folding of the aptamer domain of the guanine binding riboswitch. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 572–583 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vicens, Q., Mondragón, E. & Batey, R. T. Molecular sensing by the aptamer domain of the FMN riboswitch: a general model for ligand binding by conformational selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 8586–8598 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Serganov, A. & Nudler, E. A decade of riboswitches. Cell 152, 17–24 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kovachka, S. et al. Covalent probes reveal small-molecule binding pockets in structured RNA and enable bioactive compound design. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 37460–37479 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ratni, H. et al. Discovery of risdiplam, a selective survival of motor neuron-2 (SMN2) gene splicing modifier for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). J. Med. Chem. 61, 6501–6517 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ishigami, Y. et al. Specificity, synergy, and mechanisms of splice-modifying drugs. Nat. Commun. 15, 1880 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Campagne, S. et al. Structural basis of a small molecule targeting RNA for a specific splicing correction. Nat. Chem. Biol. 15, 1191–1198 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Malard, F. et al. The diversity of splicing modifiers acting on A-1 bulged 5’-splice sites reveals rules for rational drug design. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, 4124–4136 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Childs-Disney, J. L., Wu, M., Pushechnikov, A., Aminova, O. & Disney, M. D. A small molecule microarray platform to select RNA internal loop-ligand interactions. ACS Chem. Biol. 2, 745–754 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tran, T. & Disney, M. D. Two-dimensional combinatorial screening (2DCS) of a bacterial rRNA A-site-like motif library: defining privileged asymmetric internal loops that bind aminoglycosides. Biochemistry 49, 1833–1842 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Balaratnam, S. et al. Investigating the NRAS 5′ UTR as a target for small molecules. Cell Chem. Biol. 30, 643–657.e8 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sidharthan, V. et al. Use of a small molecule microarray screen to identify inhibitors of the catalytic RNA subunit of Methanobrevibacter smithii RNase P. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, gkae1190 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wicks, S. L. & Hargrove, A. E. Fluorescent indicator displacement assays to identify and characterize small molecule interactions with RNA. Methods 167, 3–14 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Davila-Calderon, J. et al. IRES-targeting small molecule inhibits enterovirus 71 replication via allosteric stabilization of a ternary complex. Nat. Commun. 11, 4775 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Binas, O. et al. 19 F NMR-based fragment screening for 14 different biologically active RNAs and 10 DNA and protein counter-screens. Chembiochem 22, 423–433 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lundquist, K. P. et al. Design, synthesis, and screening of an RNA optimized fluorinated fragment library. SLAS Discov. 31, 100215 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zeller, M. J. et al. SHAPE-enabled fragment-based ligand discovery for RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 119, e2122660119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rizvi, N. F. et al. Discovery of selective RNA-binding small molecules by affinity-selection mass spectrometry. ACS Chem. Biol. 13, 820–831 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rizvi, N. F. et al. Targeting RNA with small molecules: identification of selective, RNA-binding small molecules occupying drug-like chemical space. SLAS Discov. 25, 384–396 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nickbarg, E. B., Spencer, K. B., Mortison, J. D. & Lee, J. T. Targeting RNA with small molecules: lessons learned from Xist RNA. RNA 29, 463–472 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Childs-Disney, J. L. et al. A massively parallel selection of small molecule-RNA motif binding partners informs design of an antiviral from sequence. Chem 4, 2384–2404 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hargrove, A. E. Small molecule-RNA targeting: starting with the fundamentals. Chem. Commun. 56, 14744–14756 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Donlic, A. et al. R-BIND 2.0: an updated database of bioactive RNA-targeting small molecules and associated RNA secondary structures. ACS Chem. Biol. 17, 1556–1566 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Yazdani, K. et al. Machine learning informs RNA-binding chemical space. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 62, e202211358 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mortison, J. D. et al. Tetracyclines modify translation by targeting key human rRNA substructures. Cell Chem. Biol. 25, 1506–1518.e13 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Velagapudi, S. P., Li, Y. & Disney, M. D. A cross-linking approach to map small molecule-RNA binding sites in cells. Bioorg. Med, Chem. Lett. 29, 1532–1536 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mukherjee, H. et al. PEARL-seq: a photoaffinity platform for the analysis of small molecule-RNA interactions. ACS Chem. Biol. 15, 2374–2381 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Balaratnam, S. et al. A chemical probe based on the PreQ1 metabolite enables transcriptome-wide mapping of binding sites. Nat. Commun. 12, 5856 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shah, R. et al. Photoaffinity enabled transcriptome-wide identification of splice modulating small molecule–RNA binding events in native cells. RSC Chem. Biol. 6, 905–918 (2025).

  45. Yang, X. et al. Mapping small molecule-RNA binding sites via Chem-CLIP synergized with capillary electrophoresis and nanopore sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, gkaf231 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Fang, L. et al. Pervasive transcriptome interactions of protein-targeted drugs. Nat. Chem. 15, 1374–1383 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Yesley, P., Poulladofonou, G., Incarnato, D. & Velema, W. A. Site-selective ligand selection by mutational profiling for covalent RNA targeting. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 65, e17243 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sengupta, A., Rice, G. M. & Weeks, K. M. Single-molecule correlated chemical probing reveals large-scale structural communication in the ribosome and the mechanism of the antibiotic spectinomycin in living cells. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000393 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wang, Y., Parmar, S., Schneekloth, J. S. & Tiwary, P. Interrogating RNA-small molecule interactions with structure probing and artificial intelligence-augmented molecular simulations. ACS Cent. Sci. 8, 741–748 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tomezsko, P. J. et al. Determination of RNA structural diversity and its role in HIV-1 RNA splicing. Nature 582, 438–442 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Morandi, E. et al. Genome-scale deconvolution of RNA structure ensembles. Nat. Methods 18, 249–252 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Olson, S. W. et al. Discovery of a large-scale, cell-state-responsive allosteric switch in the 7SK RNA using DANCE-MaP. Mol. Cell 82, 1708–1723.e10 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yang, M. et al. In vivo single-molecule analysis reveals COOLAIR RNA structural diversity. Nature 609, 373–379 (2022).

  54. Faulds, D., Balfour, J. A., Chrisp, P. & Langtry, H. D. Mitoxantrone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in the chemotherapy of cancer. Drugs 41, 400–449 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chu, F. K., Maley, G. F., Maley, F. & Belfort, M. Intervening sequence in the thymidylate synthase gene of bacteriophage T4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 3049–3053 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gott, J. M., Shub, D. A. & Belfort, M. Multiple self-splicing introns in bacteriophage T4: evidence from autocatalytic GTP labeling of RNA in vitro. Cell 47, 81–87 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Cech, T. R., Damberger, S. H. & Gutell, R. R. Representation of the secondary and tertiary structure of group I introns. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 273–280 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Janes, J. et al. The ReFRAME library as a comprehensive drug repurposing library and its application to the treatment of cryptosporidiosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 10750–10755 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Shortridge, M. D., Vidalala, V. & Varani, G. The kinase inhibitor palbociclib is a potent and specific RNA-binding molecule. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.20.477126 (2022).

  60. Meyer, S. M. et al. Optimization of a protein-targeted medicine into an RNA-specific small molecule. ACS Chem. Biol. 18, 2336–2342 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  61. von Ahsen, U., Davies, J. & Schroeder, R. Antibiotic inhibition of group I ribozyme function. Nature 353, 368–370 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  62. von Ahsen, U., Davies, J. & Schroeder, R. Non-competitive inhibition of group I intron RNA self-splicing by aminoglycoside antibiotics. J. Mol. Biol. 226, 935–941 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  63. von Ahsen, U. & Noller, H. F. Footprinting the sites of interaction of antibiotics with catalytic group I intron RNA. Science 260, 1500–1503 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Hoch, I., Berens, C., Westhof, E. & Schroeder, R. Antibiotic inhibition of RNA catalysis: neomycin B binds to the catalytic core of the td group I intron displacing essential metal ions. J. Mol. Biol. 282, 557–569 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mercure, S., Montplaisir, S. & Lemay, G. Correlation between the presence of a self-splicing intron in the 25S rDNA of C.albicans and strains susceptibility to 5-fluorocytosine. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 6020–6027 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bass, B. L. & Cech, T. R. Ribozyme inhibitors: deoxyguanosine and dideoxyguanosine are competitive inhibitors of self-splicing of the Tetrahymena ribosomal ribonucleic acid precursor. Biochemistry 25, 4473–4477 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Yarus, M. A specific amino acid binding site composed of RNA. Science 240, 1751–1758 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  68. von Ahsen, U. & Schroeder, R. Streptomycin and self-splicing. Nature 346, 801 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  69. von Ahsen, U. & Schroeder, R. Streptomycin inhibits splicing of group I introns by competition with the guanosine substrate. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 2261–2265 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Liu, T. et al. Molecular insights into de novo small-molecule recognition by an intron RNA structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2502425122 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Pors, K. et al. Alchemix: a novel alkylating anthraquinone with potent activity against anthracycline- and cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2, 607–610 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Pors, K. et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel chloroethylaminoanthraquinones with potent cytotoxic activity against cisplatin-resistant tumor cells. J. Med. Chem. 47, 1856–1859 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Pors, K. et al. Synthesis of DNA-directed pyrrolidinyl and piperidinyl confined alkylating chloroalkylaminoanthraquinones: potential for development of tumor-selective N-oxides. J. Med. Chem. 49, 7013–7023 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Abdallah, Q. M. A. et al. Minor structural modifications to alchemix influence mechanism of action and pharmacological activity. Biochem. Pharm. 83, 1514–1522 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Wright, E. P. et al. Mitoxantrone and analogues bind and stabilize i-motif forming DNA sequences. Sci. Rep. 6, 39456 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Errington, R. J. et al. Probing cytochrome P450 bioactivation and fluorescent properties with morpholinyl-tethered anthraquinones. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 28, 1274–1277 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Sugiura, Y., Shiraki, T., Konishi, M. & Oki, T. DNA intercalation and cleavage of an antitumor antibiotic dynemicin that contains anthracycline and enediyne cores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 3831–3835 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Carlson, C. B., Vuyisich, M., Gooch, B. D. & Beal, P. A. Preferred RNA binding sites for a threading intercalator revealed by in vitro evolution. Chem. Biol. 10, 663–672 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Zheng, S., Chen, Y., Donahue, C. P., Wolfe, M. S. & Varani, G. Structural basis for stabilization of the tau pre-mRNA splicing regulatory element by novantrone (mitoxantrone). Chem. Biol. 16, 557–566 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Verebová, V. et al. Anthraquinones quinizarin and danthron unwind negatively supercoiled DNA and lengthen linear DNA. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 444, 50–55 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Mohammad, H. et al. Role of intercalation in the electrical properties of nucleic acids for use in molecular electronics. Nanoscale Horiz. 6, 651–660 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Sosic, A. et al. Multifaceted aspects of HIV-1 nucleocapsid inhibition by TAR-targeting peptidyl-anthraquinones bearing terminal aromatic moieties. Viruses 14, 2133 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Kapuscinski, J. & Darzynkiewicz, Z. Interactions of antitumor agents ametantrone and mitoxantrone (novatrone) with double-stranded DNA. Biochem. Pharm. 34, 4203–4213 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Pommier, Y., Leo, E., Zhang, H. & Marchand, C. DNA topoisomerases and their poisoning by anticancer and antibacterial drugs. Chem. Biol. 17, 421–433 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Feofanov, A., Sharonov, S., Kudelina, I., Fleury, F. & Nabiev, I. Localization and molecular interactions of mitoxantrone within living K562 cells as probed by confocal spectral imaging analysis. Biophys. J. 73, 3317–3327 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Gopinath, S. C. B., Matsugami, A., Katahira, M. & Kumar, P. K. R. Human vault-associated non-coding RNAs bind to mitoxantrone, a chemotherapeutic compound. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 4874–4881 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  87. Velagapudi, S. P. et al. Approved anti-cancer drugs target oncogenic non-coding RNAs. Cell Chem. Biol. 25, 1086–1094.e7 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  88. Zwelling, L. A. et al. Activity of two novel anthracene-9,10-diones against human leukemia cells containing intercalator-sensitive or -resistant forms of topoisomerase II. Biochem. Pharm. 46, 265–271 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  89. McKeown, S. R., Hejmadi, M. V., McIntyre, I. A., McAleer, J. J. & Patterson, L. H. AQ4N: an alkylaminoanthraquinone N-oxide showing bioreductive potential and positive interaction with radiation in vivo. Br. J. Cancer 72, 76–81 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  90. Zubradt, M. et al. DMS-MaPseq for genome-wide or targeted RNA structure probing in vivo. Nat. Methods 14, 75–82 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  91. Yazdani, K. et al. Decoding complexity in biomolecular recognition of DNA i-motifs with microarrays. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 12020–12030 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Liu, T. & Pyle, A. M. Discovery of highly reactive self-splicing group II introns within the mitochondrial genomes of human pathogenic fungi. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 12422–12432 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Walstrum, S. A. & Uhlenbeck, O. C. The self-splicing RNA of Tetrahymena is trapped in a less active conformation by gel purification. Biochemistry 29, 10573–10576 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  94. Zhang, A., Derbyshire, V., Salvo, J. L. & Belfort, M. Escherichia coli protein StpA stimulates self-splicing by promoting RNA assembly in vitro. RNA 1, 783–793 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Pan, J., Thirumalai, D. & Woodson, S. A. Folding of RNA involves parallel pathways. J. Mol. Biol. 273, 7–13 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  96. Treiber, D. K., Rook, M. S., Zarrinkar, P. P. & Williamson, J. R. Kinetic intermediates trapped by native interactions in RNA folding. Science 279, 1943–1946 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Russell, R. & Herschlag, D. Probing the folding landscape of the Tetrahymena ribozyme: commitment to form the native conformation is late in the folding pathway. J. Mol. Biol. 308, 839–851 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  98. Waldsich, C., Masquida, B., Westhof, E. & Schroeder, R. Monitoring intermediate folding states of the td group I intron in vivo. EMBO J. 21, 5281–5291 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Sinan, S., Yuan, X. & Russell, R. The Azoarcus group I intron ribozyme misfolds and is accelerated for refolding by ATP-dependent RNA chaperone proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 37304–37312 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  100. Li, S. et al. Topological crossing in the misfolded Tetrahymena ribozyme resolved by cryo-EM. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2209146119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  101. Bonilla, S. L., Vicens, Q. & Kieft, J. S. Cryo-EM reveals an entangled kinetic trap in the folding of a catalytic RNA. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq4144 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  102. Marinus, T., Fessler, A. B., Ogle, C. A. & Incarnato, D. A novel SHAPE reagent enables the analysis of RNA structure in living cells with unprecedented accuracy. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, e34 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  103. Incarnato, D. Sequencing-based analysis of RNA structures in living cells with 2A3 via SHAPE-MaP. Methods Enzymol. 691, 153–181 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  104. Burns, C. P., Haugstad, B. N. & North, J. A. Membrane transport of mitoxantrone by L1210 leukemia cells. Biochem. Pharm. 36, 857–860 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Bell, D. H. Characterization of the fluorescence of the antitumor agent, mitoxantrone. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 949, 132–137 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  106. Lan, T. C. T. et al. Secondary structural ensembles of the SARS-CoV-2 RNA genome in infected cells. Nat. Commun. 13, 1128 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Miglietta, G. et al. RNA G-quadruplexes in Kirsten Ras (KRAS) oncogene as targets for small molecules inhibiting translation. J. Med. Chem. 60, 9448–9461 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Zhao, J. et al. Enhanced transcriptome-wide RNA G-quadruplex sequencing for low RNA input samples with rG4-seq 2.0. BMC Biol. 20, 257 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Foye, W. O., Vajragupta, O. & Sengupta, S. K. DNA-binding specificity and RNA polymerase inhibitory activity of bis(aminoalkyl)anthraquinones and bis(methylthio)vinylquinolinium iodides. J. Pharm. Sci. 71, 253–257 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  110. Lown, J. W., Hanstock, C. C., Bradley, R. D. & Scraba, D. G. Interactions of the antitumor agents mitoxantrone and bisantrene with deoxyribonucleic acids studied by electron microscopy. Mol. Pharm. 25, 178–184 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  111. Panousis, C. & Phillips, D. R. DNA sequence specificity of mitoxantrone. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 1342–1345 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  112. Parker, B. S., Cutts, S. M., Cullinane, C. & Phillips, D. R. Formaldehyde activation of mitoxantrone yields CpG and CpA specific DNA adducts. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 982–990 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  113. Liaw, Y. C. et al. Antitumor drug nogalamycin binds DNA in both grooves simultaneously: molecular structure of nogalamycin-DNA complex. Biochemistry 28, 9913–9918 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  114. Van Nostrand, E. L. et al. A large-scale binding and functional map of human RNA-binding proteins. Nature 583, 711–719 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  115. Lambert, N. et al. RNA Bind-n-Seq: quantitative assessment of the sequence and structural binding specificity of RNA binding proteins. Mol. Cell 54, 887–900 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  116. Orenstein, Y., Ohler, U. & Berger, B. Finding RNA structure in the unstructured RBPome. BMC Genomics 19, 154 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  117. Jolma, A. et al. Binding specificities of human RNA-binding proteins toward structured and linear RNA sequences. Genome Res. 30, 962–973 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  118. Laverty, K. U. et al. PRIESSTESS: interpretable, high-performing models of the sequence and structure preferences of RNA-binding proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, e111 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  119. Harris, S. E. et al. Dissecting RNA selectivity mediated by tandem RNA-binding domains. J. Biol. Chem. 301, 108435 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  120. Borovská, I. et al. Identification of conserved RNA regulatory switches in living cells using RNA secondary structure ensemble mapping and covariation analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 43, 842–856 (2025).

  121. Clamer, M. et al. Active ribosome profiling with RiboLace. Cell Rep. 25, 1097–1108.e5 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  122. Cohen, S. S. & Lichtenstein, J. Polyamines and ribosome structure. J. Biol. Chem. 235, 2112–2116 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  123. Stevens, L. The binding of spermine to the ribosomes and ribosomal ribonucleic acid from Bacillus stearothermophilus. Biochem J. 113, 117–121 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  124. Hardy, S. J. & Turnock, G. Stabilization of 70S ribosomes by spermidine. Nat. New Biol. 229, 17–19 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  125. Yoshida, M., Kashiwagi, K., Kawai, G., Ishihama, A. & Igarashi, K. Polyamine enhancement of the synthesis of adenylate cyclase at the translational level and the consequential stimulation of the synthesis of the RNA polymerase sigma 28 subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 16289–16295 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  126. Koculi, E., Lee, N.-K., Thirumalai, D. & Woodson, S. A. Folding of the tetrahymena ribozyme by polyamines: importance of counterion valence and size. J. Mol. Biol. 341, 27–36 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  127. Lightfoot, H. L. & Hall, J. Endogenous polyamine function—the RNA perspective. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 11275–11290 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  128. Neuner, E., Frener, M., Lusser, A. & Micura, R. Superior cellular activities of azido- over amino-functionalized ligands for engineered preQ1 riboswitches in E.coli. RNA Biol. 15, 1376–1383 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  129. Sander, T., Freyss, J., von Korff, M. & Rufener, C. DataWarrior: an open-source program for chemistry aware data visualization and analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55, 460–473 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  130. Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  131. Zhang, J., Kobert, K., Flouri, T. & Stamatakis, A. PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics 30, 614–620 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  132. Incarnato, D., Morandi, E., Simon, L. M. & Oliviero, S. RNA framework: an all-in-one toolkit for the analysis of RNA structures and post-transcriptional modifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, e97 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  133. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  134. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  135. Lorenz, R. et al. ViennaRNA package 2.0. Algorithms Mol. Biol. 6, 26 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  136. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the European Research Council (European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program), grant agreement number 101124787 (RNAStrEnD) to D.I., and partly supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (ZIABC011585). The contributions of the NIH author(s) were made as part of their official duties as NIH federal employees, are in compliance with agency policy requirements, and are considered Works of the United States Government. However, the findings and conclusions presented in this paper are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Chundan Zhang, Ivana Borovská.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Genetics, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute (GBB), University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

    Chundan Zhang, Ivana Borovská, Teona Iobashvili, Edoardo Morandi & Danny Incarnato

  2. Institute of Molecular Physiology and Genetics, Centre of Biosciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak Republic

    Ivana Borovská

  3. Stratingh Institute for Chemistry, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

    Marta Lionnez & Martin D. Witte

  4. Institute of Cancer Therapeutics, Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK

    Oluwatosin S. Olayinka & Klaus Pors

  5. Department of Molecular Immunology, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

    Rinse de Boer

  6. IMMAGINA Biotechnology S.r.l., Viale dell’Industria 47, Pergine Valsugana (TN), Italy

    Massimiliano Clamer

  7. Chemical Biology Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA

    John S. Schneekloth Jr.

Authors
  1. Chundan Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ivana Borovská
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Teona Iobashvili
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Edoardo Morandi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marta Lionnez
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Oluwatosin S. Olayinka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rinse de Boer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Massimiliano Clamer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Martin D. Witte
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Klaus Pors
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. John S. Schneekloth Jr.
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Danny Incarnato
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.Z. and D.I. designed the experiments, with input from J.S.S., K.P., and M.D.W.; C.Z., I.B., T.I., M.L., and O.S.O. performed the experiments; R.B. performed the microscopy; M.L., O.S.O., M.D.W., and K.P. performed synthesis and characterization of the anthraquinone analogs; E.M. and D.I. optimized the DRACO algorithm and performed the bioinformatic analyses; M.C. supported the RiboLace analysis; C.Z., I.B., J.S.S., and D.I. wrote the article with input from all the authors; D.I. supervised the research.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danny Incarnato.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

M.C. is the founder, director of, and a shareholder in IMMAGINA Biotechnology S.r.l. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Yiliang Ding, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 2 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 3 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 4 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 5 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 6 (download XLSX )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source data (download ZIP )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, C., Borovská, I., Iobashvili, T. et al. RNA functional modulation by Mitoxantrone via RNA structural ensemble repartitioning. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70801-9

Download citation

  • Received: 18 September 2025

  • Accepted: 03 March 2026

  • Published: 23 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70801-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing