Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
A multifaceted model of Entamoeba histolytica KERP2 regulating gene expression and host cell responses
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 26 March 2026

A multifaceted model of Entamoeba histolytica KERP2 regulating gene expression and host cell responses

  • Ruofan Peng  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1441-37411,
  • Herbert J. Santos  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4322-01451 &
  • Tomoyoshi Nozaki  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-1354-51331 

Nature Communications , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 3004 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Parasitology
  • Pathogens

Abstract

Entamoeba histolytica causes amoebiasis and damages intestinal epithelium, but how individual parasite factors coordinate parasite gene regulation with host remodeling is unclear. We investigate lysine- and glutamic acid-rich protein 2, a factor linked to the host brush border. Sequence analysis, imaging, and functional assays show that lysine- and glutamic acid-rich protein 2 accumulates in the parasite nucleus, binds AT-rich DNA, and modulates transcriptional programs related to Amoebiasis, including cysteine protease and sulfur metabolism. During parasite-epithelium contact, the protein enters host epithelial cells and is associated with increased deoxyribonucleic acid synthesis, altered cytoskeletal regulators, actin remodeling, and reduced barrier integrity. Here, we propose a working model in which lysine- and glutamic acid-rich protein 2 links parasite chromatin-associated regulation with host epithelial remodeling during contact. Notably, our data support host cytoskeletal and junctional phenotypes and do not yet establish a direct role for it in host chromatin regulation. Together, these observations suggest a potentially broader mechanism by which extracellular pathogens deploy effectors to optimize virulence and adapt to diverse host environments.

Similar content being viewed by others

Single cell expression and chromatin accessibility of the Toxoplasma gondii lytic cycle identifies AP2XII-8 as an essential ribosome regulon driver

Article Open access 28 August 2024

TransLeish: Identification of membrane transporters essential for survival of intracellular Leishmania parasites in a systematic gene deletion screen

Article Open access 02 January 2025

Spatial multi-omics reveals cell-type-specific nuclear compartments

Article 09 April 2025

Data availability

The RNA-seq data generated in this study have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession codes GSE290785 and GSE290901. The ChIP-seq data generated in this study have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE292714. The proteomics data generated in this study have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange Consortium under project identifiers PXD062553 and PXD062502. Source data are provided with this paper. No datasets generated in this study are available under restricted access. Newly generated materials used in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Koch, A. & Mizrahi, V. Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Trends Microbiol. 26, 555–556 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Disson, O., Moura, A. & Lecuit, M. Making sense of the biodiversity and virulence of listeria monocytogenes. Trends Microbiol 29, 811–822 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Einarsson, E., Ma’ayeh, S. & Svard, S. G. An up-date on Giardia and giardiasis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol 34, 47–52 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Begum, S., Gorman, H., Chadha, A. & Chadee, K. Entamoeba histolytica. Trends Parasitol. 37, 676–677 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mugnier, M. R., Stebbins, C. E. & Papavasiliou, F. N. Masters of Disguise: Antigenic Variation and the VSG Coat in Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS Pathog. 12, e1005784 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kantor, M. et al. Entamoeba Histolytica: Updates in Clinical Manifestation, Pathogenesis, and Vaccine Development. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 4601420 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zulfiqar, H., Mathew, G. & Horrall, S. Amebiasis. In StatPearls (StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island, FL, 2025).

  8. Ralston, K. S. et al. Trogocytosis by Entamoeba histolytica contributes to cell killing and tissue invasion. Nature 508, 526–530 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stanley, S. L. Jr Amoebiasis. Lancet 361, 1025–1034 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blazquez, S., Rigothier, M. C., Huerre, M. & Guillen, N. Initiation of inflammation and cell death during liver abscess formation by Entamoeba histolytica depends on activity of the galactose/N-acetyl-D-galactosamine lectin. Int J. Parasitol. 37, 425–433 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lidell, M. E., Moncada, D. M., Chadee, K. & Hansson, G. C. Entamoeba histolytica cysteine proteases cleave the MUC2 mucin in its C-terminal domain and dissolve the protective colonic mucus gel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9298–9303 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Faust, D. M. & Guillen, N. Virulence and virulence factors in Entamoeba histolytica, the agent of human amoebiasis. Microbes Infect. 14, 1428–1441 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Seigneur, M., Mounier, J., Prevost, M. C. & Guillen, N. A lysine- and glutamic acid-rich protein, KERP1, from Entamoeba histolytica binds to human enterocytes. Cell Microbiol 7, 569–579 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Santi-Rocca, J. et al. The lysine- and glutamic acid-rich protein KERP1 plays a role in Entamoeba histolytica liver abscess pathogenesis. Cell Microbiol. 10, 202–217 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Das, K. et al. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of Entamoeba histolytica identifies kerp2 as a genetic marker associated with disease outcomes. Parasitol. Int. 83, 102370 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blum, M. et al. InterPro: the protein sequence classification resource in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D444–D456 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aravind, L. & Koonin, E. V. SAP - a putative DNA-binding motif involved in chromosomal organization. Trends Biochem Sci. 25, 112–114 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Capitano, M. L. et al. Secreted nuclear protein DEK regulates hematopoiesis through CXCR2 signaling. J. Clin. Invest 129, 2555–2570 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Davies, C. et al. TbSAP is a novel chromatin protein repressing metacyclic variant surface glycoprotein expression sites in bloodstream form Trypanosoma brucei. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 3242–3262 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mitra, B. N., Saito-Nakano, Y., Nakada-Tsukui, K., Sato, D. & Nozaki, T. Rab11B small GTPase regulates secretion of cysteine proteases in the enteric protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica. Cell Microbiol 9, 2112–2125 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Aguilar-Rojas, A. et al. Insights into amebiasis using a human 3D-intestinal model. Cell Microbiol 22, e13203 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Miyaji, M. et al. Selective DNA-binding of SP120 (rat ortholog of human hnRNP U) is mediated by arginine-glycine rich domain and modulated by RNA. PLoS One 18, e0289599 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Waldmann, T., Baack, M., Richter, N. & Gruss, C. Structure-specific binding of the proto-oncogene protein DEK to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 7003–7010 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Berger, S. L., Kouzarides, T., Shiekhattar, R. & Shilatifard, A. An operational definition of epigenetics. Genes Dev. 23, 781–783 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cheeseman, K. & Weitzman, J. B. Host-parasite interactions: an intimate epigenetic relationship. Cell Microbiol 17, 1121–1132 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Waldmann, T., Eckerich, C., Baack, M. & Gruss, C. The ubiquitous chromatin protein DEK alters the structure of DNA by introducing positive supercoils. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 24988–24994 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Crick, F. H. C. The packing of α-helices: Simple coiled-coils. Acta Crystallogr. 6, 689–697 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kohn, W. D., Mant, C. T. & Hodges, R. S. Alpha-helical protein assembly motifs. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 2583–2586 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lupas, A. N. & Bassler, J. Coiled coils - a model system for the 21st century. Trends Biochem Sci. 42, 130–140 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu, J. et al. Intramolecular masking of nuclear import signal on NF-AT4 by casein kinase I and MEKK1. Cell 93, 851–861 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zulkefli, K. L., Houghton, F. J., Gosavi, P. & Gleeson, P. A. A role for Rab11 in the homeostasis of the endosome-lysosomal pathway. Exp. Cell Res 380, 55–68 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wilson, B. et al. Proximity labelling identifies pro-migratory endocytic recycling cargo and machinery of the Rab4 and Rab11 families. J. Cell Sci.136. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.260468 (2023).

  33. Welz, T., Wellbourne-Wood, J. & Kerkhoff, E. Orchestration of cell surface proteins by Rab11. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 407–415 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Goldenberg, N. M. & Steinberg, B. E. Surface charge: a key determinant of protein localization and function. Cancer Res 70, 1277–1280 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Woolfson, D. N. Understanding a protein fold: The physics, chemistry, and biology of alpha-helical coiled coils. J. Biol. Chem. 299, 104579 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Posor, Y., Jang, W. & Haucke, V. Phosphoinositides as membrane organizers. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 797–816 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sharma, M. et al. Characterization of extracellular vesicles from entamoeba histolytica identifies roles in intercellular communication that regulates parasite growth and development. Infect Immun 88. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00349-20 (2020).

  38. Ohama, T., Wang, L., Griner, E. M. & Brautigan, D. L. Protein Ser/Thr phosphatase-6 is required for maintenance of E-cadherin at adherens junctions. BMC Cell Biol. 14, 42 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ohama, T. The multiple functions of protein phosphatase 6. Biochim Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res 1866, 74–82 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou, X. et al. I-TASSER-MTD: A deep-learning-based platform for multi-domain protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc. 17, 2326–2353 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zheng, W. et al. Folding non-homologous proteins by coupling deep-learning contact maps with I-TASSER assembly simulations. Cell Rep. Methods 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100014 (2021).

  42. Yang, J. & Zhang, Y. I-TASSER server: New development for protein structure and function predictions. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, W174–W181 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gabler, F. et al. Protein sequence analysis using the MPI bioinformatics Toolkit. Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma. 72, e108 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Delorenzi, M. & Speed, T. An HMM model for coiled-coil domains and a comparison with PSSM-based predictions. Bioinformatics 18, 617–625 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lupas, A. Prediction and analysis of coiled-coil structures. Methods Enzymol. 266, 513–525 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lupas, A., Van Dyke, M. & Stock, J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences. Science 252, 1162–1164 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Rost, B. & Sander, C. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins 19, 55–72 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kosugi, S., Hasebe, M., Tomita, M. & Yanagawa, H. Systematic identification of cell cycle-dependent yeast nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins by prediction of composite motifs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10171–10176 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Gasteiger, E. et al. ExPASy: The proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3784–3788 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jurrus, E. et al. Improvements to the APBS biomolecular solvation software suite. Protein Sci. 27, 112–128 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Meng, E. C. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: Tools for structure building and analysis. Protein Sci. 32, e4792 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Capella-Gutierrez, S., Silla-Martinez, J. M. & Gabaldon, T. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics. 25, 1972–1973 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Minh, B. Q. et al. IQ-TREE 2: New Models and Efficient Methods for Phylogenetic Inference in the Genomic Era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive tree of Life (iTOL) v6: recent updates to the phylogenetic tree display and annotation tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 52, W78–W82 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Nakada-Tsukui, K., Okada, H., Mitra, B. N. & Nozaki, T. Phosphatidylinositol-phosphates mediate cytoskeletal reorganization during phagocytosis via a unique modular protein consisting of RhoGEF/DH and FYVE domains in the parasitic protozoon Entamoeba histolytica. Cell Microbiol. 11, 1471–1491 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Diamond, L. S., Harlow, D. R. & Cunnick, C. C. A new medium for the axenic cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica and other Entamoeba. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med Hyg. 72, 431–432 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bracha, R., Nuchamowitz, Y., Anbar, M. & Mirelman, D. Transcriptional silencing of multiple genes in trophozoites of Entamoeba histolytica. PLoS Pathog. 2, e48 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Nozaki, T. et al. Characterization of the gene encoding serine acetyltransferase, a regulated enzyme of cysteine biosynthesis from the protist parasites Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar. Regulation and possible function of the cysteine biosynthetic pathway in Entamoeba. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 32445–32452 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hinman, S. S., Wang, Y., Kim, R. & Allbritton, N. L. In vitro generation of self-renewing human intestinal epithelia over planar and shaped collagen hydrogels. Nat. Protoc. 16, 352–382 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Danecek, P. et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience 10, giab008 (2021).

  65. Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Yu, G. et al. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287 (2012).

  68. Ge, S. X., Jung, D. & Yao, R. ShinyGO: A graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics 36, 2628–2629 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Stirling, D. R. et al. CellProfiler 4: Improvements in speed, utility and usability. BMC Bioinforma. 22, 433 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Suarez-Arnedo, A. et al. An image J plugin for the high throughput image analysis of in vitro scratch wound healing assays. PLoS One 15, e0232565 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported partly by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (JP21H02723 to T.N.), Fostering Joint International Research (B) from JSPS (JP21KK135 to T.N.), and Grant for Science and Technology Research Partnership for Sustainable Development (SATREPS) from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) and Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) (JP24jm0110022) to T.N., Grant for research on emerging and re-emerging infectious diseases from AMED (JP24fk0108680 to T.N.), and support from the University of Tokyo Pandemic Preparedness, Infection, and Advanced Research Center (UTOPIA) and AMED (JP243fa627001) to T.N. This work was also partly supported by JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (23K06514 to H.J.S.), JSPS Bilateral Joint Research Grant (JPJSBP120223203 to H.J.S.), and JST SPRING (Grant Number JPMJSP2108 to R.P.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank Dr. Cecilia Villegas Novoa, Dr. Yuli Wang, and Prof. Nancy Allbritton from the Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington and Prof. Soichiro Ishihara and Dr. Yuzo Nagai from Department of Surgery, The University of Tokyo Hospital for their help in constructing 3D-crypt model. We thank Prof. Tomoko Ishino and Dr. Naoki Shinzawa from the Department of Parasitology and Tropical Medicine, Science Tokyo for their help in optimizing ChIP protocol.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Chemistry, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

    Ruofan Peng, Herbert J. Santos & Tomoyoshi Nozaki

Authors
  1. Ruofan Peng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Herbert J. Santos
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tomoyoshi Nozaki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

R.P., H.S. and T.N. contributed to conceptualization; R.P., H.S. contributed to methodology; R.P. contributed to investigation and experiments; R.P., H.S. and T.N. contributed to manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomoyoshi Nozaki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Jesús Valdés, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description Of Additional Supplementary File (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 2 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 3 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 4 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 5 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 6 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 7 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 8 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Movie 1 (download MP4 )

Supplementary Movie 2 (download MP4 )

Supplementary Movie 3 (download MP4 )

Supplementary Movie 4 (download MP4 )

Reporting summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, R., Santos, H.J. & Nozaki, T. A multifaceted model of Entamoeba histolytica KERP2 regulating gene expression and host cell responses. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70847-9

Download citation

  • Received: 09 March 2025

  • Accepted: 03 March 2026

  • Published: 26 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70847-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology