Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Nature Communications
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. nature communications
  3. articles
  4. article
VPS26A retromer complex and SNX27 mediate stress-induced Golgi bypass of membrane proteins
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 April 2026

VPS26A retromer complex and SNX27 mediate stress-induced Golgi bypass of membrane proteins

  • Ye Jin Kim  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0008-5168-27491 na1,
  • Chaeyoung Lee  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0001-2723-99651 na1,
  • Soo Kyung Seo  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0005-2347-07201,
  • Jae Won Roh  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-17391,
  • Hye Ryung Lee1,
  • Su Jin Hwang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9182-82812,
  • Nienping Chang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8584-64133,
  • Hee Seong Choi  ORCID: orcid.org/0009-0002-3457-28003,
  • Dong Hoon Shin  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5574-79751,
  • Hui Kwon Kim  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0694-92444,
  • Han Sang Kim  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-6504-99275,
  • Hyun-Soo Cho  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4067-47153,
  • Jae Myun Lee  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5273-31132,
  • Heon Yung Gee  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8741-61771,
  • Min Goo Lee  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-012X1,6 &
  • …
  • Shin Hye Noh  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3118-92401,6 

Nature Communications (2026) Cite this article

  • 5548 Accesses

  • 4 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Endosomes
  • Protein translocation
  • Retromer
  • Secretion

Abstract

Many proteins can reach the cell surface through a Golgi-independent unconventional protein secretion (UPS) pathway, particularly under cellular stress conditions. However, the molecular mechanisms that mediate UPS remain largely elusive. In this study, VPS26A-containing retromer complex, along with the sorting nexin SNX27, is identified as a regulator of UPS of transmembrane proteins, including the trafficking-deficient ∆F508 mutant CFTR, which causes cystic fibrosis, and the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, associated with COVID-19. A targeted CRISPR knockout screen identified VPS26A as a key contributor in the UPS of ∆F508-CFTR. Subsequent molecular analyses revealed that SNX27 recruits ∆F508-CFTR to the VPS26A-VPS35-VPS29 retromer complex, facilitating its transport to the cell surface under UPS-inducing conditions. Additionally, VPS26A and SNX27 are necessary for UPS of the spike protein, enabling the formation of intact SARS-CoV-2 virions. These findings suggest that the retromer complex and SNX27, known for their roles in recycling endosomes, mediate previously unrecognized functions in the UPS of transmembrane proteins.

Similar content being viewed by others

High-throughput screening of genetic and cellular drivers of syncytium formation induced by the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2

Article Open access 23 November 2023

Molecular basis for the assembly of the Vps5-Vps17 SNX-BAR proteins with Retromer

Article Open access 15 April 2025

Molecular mechanism of cholesterol-dependent membrane fusion in SARS-CoV-2 entry

Article Open access 17 February 2026

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the main text, main figures, and Supplementary Information. The original ICC image files generated in this study have been deposited in the EBI BioImage Archive under accession code S-BIAD3018. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Palade, G. Intracellular aspects of the process of protein synthesis. Science 189, 347–358 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rothman, J. E. Mechanisms of intracellular protein transport. Nature 372, 55–63 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nickel, W. & Rabouille, C. Mechanisms of regulated unconventional protein secretion. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 148–155 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schotman, H., Karhinen, L. & Rabouille, C. dGRASP-mediated noncanonical integrin secretion is required for Drosophila epithelial remodeling. Dev. Cell 14, 171–182 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rabouille, C. Pathways of unconventional protein secretion. Trends Cell Biol. 27, 230–240 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Filaquier, A., Marin, P., Parmentier, M. L. & Villeneuve, J. Roads and hubs of unconventional protein secretion. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 75, 102072 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rabouille, C., Malhotra, V. & Nickel, W. Diversity in unconventional protein secretion. J. Cell Sci. 125, 5251–5255 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Riordan, J. R. et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA. Science 245, 1066–1073 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farinha, C. M. & Amaral, M. D. Most F508del-CFTR is targeted to degradation at an early folding checkpoint and independently of calnexin. Mol. Cell Biol. 25, 5242–5252 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ward, C. L., Omura, S. & Kopito, R. R. Degradation of CFTR by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Cell 83, 121–127 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kopito, R. R. Biosynthesis and degradation of CFTR. Physiol. Rev. 79, S167–S173 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gee, H. Y., Noh, S. H., Tang, B. L., Kim, K. H. & Lee, M. G. Rescue of DeltaF508-CFTR trafficking via a GRASP-dependent unconventional secretion pathway. Cell 146, 746–760 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Park, H., Shin, D. H., Sim, J. R., Aum, S. & Lee, M. G. IRE1α kinase-mediated unconventional protein secretion rescues misfolded CFTR and pendrin. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax9914 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Noh, S. H. et al. Specific autophagy and ESCRT components participate in the unconventional secretion of CFTR. Autophagy 14, 1761–1778 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Park, H. et al. TMED3 complex mediates ER stress-associated secretion of CFTR, pendrin, and SARS-CoV-2 spike. Adv. Sci. 9, e2105320 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Watanabe, Y., Allen, J. D., Wrapp, D., McLellan, J. S. & Crispin, M. Site-specific glycan analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike. Science 369, 330–333 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cortese, M. et al. Integrative imaging reveals SARS-CoV-2-induced reshaping of subcellular morphologies. Cell Host Microbe 28, 853–866.e855 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, J. et al. SARS-CoV-2 remodels the Golgi apparatus to facilitate viral assembly and secretion. PLoS Pathog. 21, e1013295 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ghosh, S. et al. β-coronaviruses use lysosomes for egress instead of the biosynthetic secretory pathway. Cell 183, 1520–1535.e1514 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Noh, S. H., Kim, Y. J. & Lee, M. G. Autophagy-related pathways in vesicular unconventional protein secretion. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10, 892450 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Villeneuve, J. et al. Unconventional secretion of FABP4 by endosomes and secretory lysosomes. J. Cell Biol. 217, 649–665 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seaman, M. N. J. The retromer complex: from genesis to revelations. Trends Biochem. Sci. 46, 608–620 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gee, H. Y., Kim, J. & Lee, M. G. Unconventional secretion of transmembrane proteins. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 83, 59–66 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, J. J. Retromer-mediated protein sorting and vesicular trafficking. J. Genet Genomics 43, 165–177 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kerr, M. C. et al. A novel mammalian retromer component, Vps26B. Traffic 6, 991–1001 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cullen, P. J. Endosomal sorting and signalling: an emerging role for sorting nexins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 574–582 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vagnozzi, A. N. & Praticò, D. Endosomal sorting and trafficking, the retromer complex and neurodegeneration. Mol. Psychiatry 24, 857–868 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hanley, S. E. & Cooper, K. F. Sorting nexins in protein homeostasis. Cells 10, 17 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Temkin, P. et al. SNX27 mediates retromer tubule entry and endosome-to-plasma membrane trafficking of signalling receptors. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 715–721 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Steinberg, F. et al. A global analysis of SNX27-retromer assembly and cargo specificity reveals a function in glucose and metal ion transport. Nat. Cell Biol. 15, 461–471 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Loo, L. S., Tang, N., Al-Haddawi, M., Dawe, G. S. & Hong, W. A role for sorting nexin 27 in AMPA receptor trafficking. Nat. Commun. 5, 3176 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gallon, M. et al. A unique PDZ domain and arrestin-like fold interaction reveals mechanistic details of endocytic recycling by SNX27-retromer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, E3604–E3613 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kim, J. Y. et al. Inhibitory regulation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator anion-transporting activities by Shank2. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 10389–10396 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lee, J. H. et al. Dynamic regulation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator by competitive interactions of molecular adaptors. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 10414–10422 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kinseth, M. A. et al. The Golgi-associated protein GRASP is required for unconventional protein secretion during development. Cell 130, 524–534 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kim, J. et al. Monomerization and ER relocalization of GRASP is a requisite for unconventional secretion of CFTR. Traffic 17, 733–753 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Simonetti, B. et al. SNX27-retromer directly binds ESCPE-1 to transfer cargo proteins during endosomal recycling. PLoS Biol. 20, e3001601 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Steinberg, F., Heesom, K. J., Bass, M. D. & Cullen, P. J. SNX17 protects integrins from degradation by sorting between lysosomal and recycling pathways. J. Cell Biol. 197, 219–230 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dong, R. et al. Endosome-ER contacts control actin nucleation and retromer function through VAP-dependent regulation of PI4P. Cell 166, 408–423 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ghai, R. et al. Structural basis for endosomal trafficking of diverse transmembrane cargos by PX-FERM proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, E643–E652 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Abramson, J. et al. Accurate structure prediction of biomolecular interactions with AlphaFold 3. Nature 630, 493–500 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Valdes-Tresanco, M. S., Valdes-Tresanco, M. E., Valiente, P. A. & Moreno, E. gmx_MMPBSA: a new tool to perform end-state free energy calculations with GROMACS. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 6281–6291 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Okiyoneda, T. et al. Peripheral protein quality control removes unfolded CFTR from the plasma membrane. Science 329, 805–810 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Young, A. et al. Dynasore inhibits removal of wild-type and ΔF508 cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) from the plasma membrane. Biochem. J. 421, 377–385 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Welz, T., Wellbourne-Wood, J. & Kerkhoff, E. Orchestration of cell surface proteins by Rab11. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 407–415 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ou, X. et al. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 11, 1620 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Song, M. S. et al. Tubular ER structures shaped by ER-phagy receptors engage in stress-induced Golgi bypass. Dev. Cell 60, 1568–1585.e1511 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yang, B. et al. SNX27 suppresses SARS-CoV-2 infection by inhibiting viral lysosome/late endosome entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2117576119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  50. van Weering, J. R., Verkade, P. & Cullen, P. J. SNX-BAR proteins in phosphoinositide-mediated, tubular-based endosomal sorting. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 21, 371–380 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hayashi, H. et al. Sorting nexin 27 interacts with multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4) and mediates internalization of MRP4. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 15054–15065 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cattin-Ortolá, J. et al. Sequences in the cytoplasmic tail of SARS-CoV-2 Spike facilitate expression at the cell surface and syncytia formation. Nat. Commun. 12, 5333 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhao, L. et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein harnesses SNX27-mediated endocytic recycling pathway. MedComm 2, 798–809 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Saraste, J., Enyioko, M., Dale, H., Prydz, K. & Machamer, C. Evidence for the role of Rab11-positive recycling endosomes as intermediates in coronavirus egress from epithelial cells. Histochem. Cell Biol. 158, 241–251 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Rowe, R. K., Suszko, J. W. & Pekosz, A. Roles for the recycling endosome, Rab8, and Rab11 in hantavirus release from epithelial cells. Virology 382, 239–249 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Coller, K. E. et al. Molecular determinants and dynamics of hepatitis C virus secretion. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002466 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Prydz, K. & Saraste, J. The life cycle and enigmatic egress of coronaviruses. Mol. Microbiol. 117, 1308–1316 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ribeiro, C. M. & Boucher, R. C. Role of endoplasmic reticulum stress in cystic fibrosis-related airway inflammatory responses. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 7, 387–394 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sim, J. R. et al. Amelioration of SARS-CoV-2 infection by ANO6 phospholipid scramblase inhibition. Cell Rep. 40, 111117 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Joung, J. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout and transcriptional activation screening. Nat. Protoc. 12, 828–863 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mirdita, M. et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat. Methods 19, 679–682 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Oh, K. S. et al. Overlooked KCNQ4 variants augment the risk of hearing loss. Exp. Mol. Med. 55, 844–859 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Evans, R. et al. Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-multimer. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.10.04.463034v2 (2021).

  64. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 30, 70–82 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G. & Im, W. CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1859–1865 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Brooks, B. R. et al. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 1545–1614 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lee, J. et al. CHARMM-GUI input generator for NAMD, GROMACS, AMBER, OpenMM, and CHARMM/OpenMM simulations using the CHARMM36 additive force field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 405–413 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1, 19–25 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Ryckaert, J.-P., Ciccotti, G. & Berendsen, H. J. Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 23, 327–341 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Medical Illustration & Design team at Yonsei University College of Medicine for providing support with the medical illustrations, Benjamin J. Latimer for his editorial assistance, and the Yonsei-Carl Zeiss Advanced Imaging Center for their technical assistance. This research was supported by grants 2021R1I1A1A01049255 (to S.H.N.), 2022R1A2C3002917 (M.G.L.), RS-2022-NR067483 (M.G.L., J.M.L.), RS-2024-00351254 (H.-S.C.) and RS-2025-18362970 (M.G.L. and H.-S.C.) from the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Science and ICT, and the grant RS-2024-00404555 (M.G.L.) and RS-2025-25422732 (M.G.L.) from the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea. M.G.L. was supported by the SBS Foundation.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Ye Jin Kim, Chaeyoung Lee.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Woo Choo Lee Institute for Precision Drug Development, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Ye Jin Kim, Chaeyoung Lee, Soo Kyung Seo, Jae Won Roh, Hye Ryung Lee, Dong Hoon Shin, Heon Yung Gee, Min Goo Lee & Shin Hye Noh

  2. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Immunology and Immunological Diseases, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Su Jin Hwang & Jae Myun Lee

  3. Department of Systems Biology and Division of Life Sciences, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Nienping Chang, Hee Seong Choi & Hyun-Soo Cho

  4. Department of Integrative Biotechnology, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea

    Hui Kwon Kim

  5. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Han Sang Kim

  6. Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Min Goo Lee & Shin Hye Noh

Authors
  1. Ye Jin Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chaeyoung Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Soo Kyung Seo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jae Won Roh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hye Ryung Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Su Jin Hwang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nienping Chang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hee Seong Choi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Dong Hoon Shin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hui Kwon Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Han Sang Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Hyun-Soo Cho
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jae Myun Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Heon Yung Gee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Min Goo Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Shin Hye Noh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.J.K. and C.L. conducted the molecular experiments and analyzed the data. S.K.S. performed the CRISPR-Cas9 screening. J.W.R. and D.H.S. performed PCA analysis, MD simulations, and predicted the protein structures using AlphaFold. H.R.L. carried out the immunocytochemistry experiments. S.J.H. performed experiments with authentic virus. N.C., H.S.C., and H.-S.C. conducted the SPR assays. H.K.K. and H.S.K. designed and assisted with the CRISPR-Cas9 screening experiments. H.Y.G. designed and analyzed the experiments using AlphaFold. J.M.L. designed and analyzed experiments with authentic SARS-CoV-2. M.G.L. and S.H.N. designed and analyzed all experiments and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Min Goo Lee or Shin Hye Noh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Kota Saito and the other anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1-8 (download ZIP )

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Source data

Source Data (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Y.J., Lee, C., Seo, S.K. et al. VPS26A retromer complex and SNX27 mediate stress-induced Golgi bypass of membrane proteins. Nat Commun (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71409-9

Download citation

  • Received: 26 May 2025

  • Accepted: 18 March 2026

  • Published: 06 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-71409-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Videos
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Editors
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors' Highlights
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Top Articles

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • For Reviewers
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Nature Communications (Nat Commun)

ISSN 2041-1723 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing