Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Breast Cancer
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj breast cancer
  3. articles
  4. article
Spatial gene expression analysis reveals drivers of extremely early lymph node metastasis in breast cancer
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 January 2026

Spatial gene expression analysis reveals drivers of extremely early lymph node metastasis in breast cancer

  • Satoi Nagasawa1,2,3 na1,
  • Keiko Kajiya1 na1,
  • Erina Ishikawa1,
  • Akinori Kanai1,
  • Ayako Suzuki1,
  • Ai Motoyoshi2,
  • Tsuguo Iwatani2,
  • Manabu Kubota4,
  • Masaru Nakamura4,
  • Tatsuya Onishi3,
  • Akiyoshi Hoshino5,
  • Ichiro Maeda5,
  • Akihiko Morozumi1,6,
  • Kenji Takatsuka7,
  • Junki Koike4,
  • Masahide Seki1,
  • Koichiro Tsugawa2 &
  • …
  • Yutaka Suzuki1 

npj Breast Cancer , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1004 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Oncology

Abstract

Lymph node metastasis correlates with breast cancer prognosis; however, the cellular mechanisms underlying the earliest metastatic events remain unclear. In spatial transcriptomic analysis of a patient with breast cancer at single-cell resolution, we identified 30 tumor cells representing the initial metastatic seeding in a lymph node. These cells originated from multiple epithelial–mesenchymal (EM) transition status and included six distinct subpopulations with biological significance. Only cells exhibiting a metabolic shift toward fatty acid metabolism successfully established lymph node colonies, implicating this shift in metastatic fitness. The tumor microenvironment surrounding these cells showed immunosuppressive and tumor-promoting features, supporting metastasis establishment. Cross-referencing these expression profiles with public datasets revealed that poor prognosis correlated not with fully mesenchymal or metastatic populations, but with hybrid EM cells exhibiting epithelial and mesenchymal traits. These findings highlight the metabolic and phenotypic plasticity of metastatic cells and serve as translational bridges between the spatial evolution of tumor cells in the extremely early stages of lymph node metastasis and clinical prognosis in breast cancer.

Similar content being viewed by others

Single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with lymph node metastases

Article Open access 01 January 2025

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals cell heterogeneity and transcriptome profile of breast cancer lymph node metastasis

Article Open access 05 October 2021

Single-cell profiling transcriptomic reveals cellular heterogeneity and cellular crosstalk in breast cancer lymphatic node, bone, and brain metastases

Article Open access 17 January 2025

Data availability

The Xenium and bulk multi-omics data supporting the findings of this study are available at the DDBJ Japanese Genotype-phenotype Archive (https://gr-sharingdbs.dbcls.jp) under accession number JGAD000946. The single-cell RNA-seq dataset from Guan et al.4 was downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE180286). METABRIC transcriptome and clinical data were downloaded from cBioPortal (https://www.cbioportal.org). Additional data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Veronesi, U. et al. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med 349, 546–553 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Turner, R. R., Ollila, D. W., Krasne, D. L. & Giuliano, A. E. Histopathologic validation of the sentinel lymph node hypothesis for breast carcinoma. Ann. Surg. 226, 271–276 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nagasawa, S. et al. Genomic profiling reveals heterogeneous populations of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Commun. Biol. 4, 438 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xu, K. et al. Microenvironment components and spatially resolved single-cell transcriptome atlas of breast cancer metastatic axillary lymph nodes. Acta Biochim Biophys. Sin. 54, 1336–1348 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pesce, C. & Morrow, M. The need for lymph node dissection in nonmetastatic breast cancer. Annu Rev. Med. 64, 119–129 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. de Boer, M., van Dijck, J. A., Bult, P., Borm, G. F. & Tjan-Heijnen, V. C. Breast cancer prognosis and occult lymph node metastases, isolated tumor cells, and micrometastases. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 102, 410–425 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hinshaw, D. C. & Shevde, L. A. The Tumor Microenvironment Innately Modulates Cancer Progression. Cancer Res. 79, 4557–4566 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, C. K. et al. Tumor metastasis to lymph nodes requires YAP-dependent metabolic adaptation. Science 363, 644–649 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen, M. R. Check concentrations of medications ordered for children. Nursing 16, 8 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nieto, M. A., Huang, R. Y., Jackson, R. A. & Thiery, J. P. Emt: 2016. Cell 166, 21–45 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Puisieux, A., Brabletz, T. & Caramel, J. Oncogenic roles of EMT-inducing transcription factors. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 488–494 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rubtsova, S. N., Zhitnyak, I. Y. & Gloushankova, N. A. Dual role of E-cadherin in cancer cells. Tissue Barriers 10, 2005420 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fischer, K. R. et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is not required for lung metastasis but contributes to chemoresistance. Nature 527, 472–476 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ye, X. et al. Upholding a role for EMT in breast cancer metastasis. Nature 547, E1–E3 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Diepenbruck, M. & Christofori, G. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and metastasis: yes, no, maybe? Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 43, 7–13 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aiello, N. M. et al. Upholding a role for EMT in pancreatic cancer metastasis. Nature 547, E7–E8 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pastushenko, I. et al. Identification of the tumour transition states occurring during EMT. Nature 556, 463–468 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kroger, C. et al. Acquisition of a hybrid E/M state is essential for tumorigenicity of basal breast cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7353–7362 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsai, J. H., Donaher, J. L., Murphy, D. A., Chau, S. & Yang, J. Spatiotemporal regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition is essential for squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. Cancer Cell 22, 725–736 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haerinck, J., Goossens, S. & Berx, G. The epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity landscape: principles of design and mechanisms of regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet 24, 590–609 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bian, X. et al. Carboxylic acid metabolism in cancer: Mechanisms, microenvironment interactions, and therapeutic opportunities. Metabolism 171, 156334 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vymetalkova, V., Vodicka, P., Vodenkova, S., Alonso, S. & Schneider-Stock, R. DNA methylation and chromatin modifiers in colorectal cancer. Mol. Asp. Med. 69, 73–92 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ehrlich, M. DNA hypomethylation in cancer cells. Epigenomics 1, 239–259 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rodriguez, J. et al. Chromosomal instability correlates with genome-wide DNA demethylation in human primary colorectal cancers. Cancer Res. 66, 8462–9468 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Usman, S. et al. Vimentin Is at the Heart of Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Mediated Metastasis. Cancers 13, 4985 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, Y., Shi, J., Chai, K., Ying, X. & Zhou, B. P. The Role of Snail in EMT and Tumorigenesis. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 13, 963–972 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  27. DaSilva-Arnold, S. C. et al. ZEB2, a master regulator of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, mediates trophoblast differentiation. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 25, 61–75 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sekimata, M., Murakami-Sekimata, A. & Homma, Y. CpG methylation prevents YY1-mediated transcriptional activation of the vimentin promoter. Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun. 414, 767–772 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, Y., Wang, K., Qian, C. N. & Leach, R. DNA methylation is associated with transcription of Snail and Slug genes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 430, 1083–1090 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Xie, H. et al. Significance of ZEB2 in the immune microenvironment of colon cancer. Front. Genet. 13, 995333 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Valdivia, A., Avalos, A. M. & Leyton, L. Thy-1 (CD90)-regulated cell adhesion and migration of mesenchymal cells: insights into adhesomes, mechanical forces, and signaling pathways. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 1221306 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Brenet, M. et al. Thy-1 (CD90)-induced metastatic cancer cell migration and invasion Are beta3 Integrin-dependent and involve a Ca(2+)/P2X7 receptor signaling axis. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 592442 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. van Zijl, F. et al. Hepatic tumor-stroma crosstalk guides epithelial to mesenchymal transition at the tumor edge. Oncogene 28, 4022–4033 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sethi, S., Macoska, J., Chen, W. & Sarkar, F. H. Molecular signature of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in human prostate cancer bone metastasis. Am. J. Transl. Res. 3, 90–99 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tinsley, E., Bredin, P., Toomey, S., Hennessy, B. T. & Furney, S. J. KMT2C and KMT2D aberrations in breast cancer. Trends Cancer 10, 519–530 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nishimura, T. et al. Evolutionary histories of breast cancer and related clones. Nature 620, 607–614 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Aran, D., Hu, Z. & Butte, A. J. xCell: digitally portraying the tissue cellular heterogeneity landscape. Genome Biol. 18, 220 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lim, E. et al. Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nat. Med. 15, 907–913 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pliner, H. A., Shendure, J. & Trapnell, C. Supervised classification enables rapid annotation of cell atlases. Nat. Methods 16, 983–986 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nguyen, Q. H. et al. Profiling human breast epithelial cells using single-cell RNA sequencing identifies cell diversity. Nat. Commun. 9, 2028 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Qiu, X. et al. Reversed graph embedding resolves complex single-cell trajectories. Nat. Methods 14, 979–982 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lamouille, S., Xu, J. & Derynck, R. Molecular mechanisms of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 178–196 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zeng, Y. A. & Nusse, R. Wnt proteins are self-renewal factors for mammary stem cells and promote their long-term expansion in culture. Cell Stem Cell 6, 568–577 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, Y. C., Zhang, Y. T., Wang, Y., Zhao, Y. & He, L. J. What role does PDL1 play in EMT changes in tumors and fibrosis?. Front. Immunol. 14, 1226038 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Imodoye, S. O. & Adedokun, K. A. EMT-induced immune evasion: connecting the dots from mechanisms to therapy. Clin. Exp. Med. 23, 4265–4287 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Oshi, M. et al. G2M Cell Cycle Pathway Score as a Prognostic Biomarker of Metastasis in Estrogen Receptor (ER)-Positive Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2921 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Graziano, F. et al. Glycolysis gene expression analysis and selective metabolic advantage in the clinical progression of colorectal cancer. Pharmacogenom. J. 17, 258–264 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sacco, J. L. & Gomez, E. W. Epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity and epigenetic heterogeneity in cancer. Cancers 16, 3289 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Teeuwssen, M. & Fodde, R. Cell Heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity in metastasis formation: the case of colon cancer. Cancers 11, 1368 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Keller, H. et al. Fatty acids and retinoids control lipid metabolism through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-retinoid X receptor heterodimers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 2160–2164 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Galimberti, V. et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 14, 297–305 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Martinez-Pomares, L. The mannose receptor. J. Leukoc. Biol. 92, 1177–1186 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Schuette, V. et al. Mannose receptor induces T-cell tolerance via inhibition of CD45 and up-regulation of CTLA-4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10649–10654 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Luca, M. E. et al. Mannosylated PLP(139-151) induces peptide-specific tolerance to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroimmunol. 160, 178–187 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kel, J. et al. Soluble mannosylated myelin peptide inhibits the encephalitogenicity of autoreactive T cells during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Am. J. Pathol. 170, 272–280 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Choi, J. H. et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling of the stepwise progression of head and neck cancer. Nat. Commun. 14, 1055 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wang, T. et al. COL4A1 promotes the growth and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells by activating FAK-Src signaling. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 39, 148 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Han, J. et al. CXCL16 promotes gastric cancer Tumorigenesis via ADAM10-Dependent CXCL16/CXCR6 axis and activates Akt and MAPK signaling pathways. Int J. Biol. Sci. 17, 2841–2852 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Curtis, C. et al. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486, 346–352 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Grosse-Wilde, A. et al. Loss of inter-cellular cooperation by complete epithelial-mesenchymal transition supports favorable outcomes in basal breast cancer patients. Oncotarget 9, 20018–20033 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Dong, Y., Tu, R., Liu, H. & Qing, G. Regulation of cancer cell metabolism: oncogenic MYC in the driver’s seat. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 5, 124 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tsuji, T., Ibaragi, S. & Hu, G. F. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cell cooperativity in metastasis. Cancer Res. 69, 7135–7139 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Ding, R. et al. Lactate modulates RNA splicing to promote CTLA-4 expression in tumor-infiltrating regulatory T cells. Immunity 57, 528–540 e526 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Reticker-Flynn, N. E. et al. Lymph node colonization induces tumor-immune tolerance to promote distant metastasis. Cell 185, 1924–1942 e1923 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kunigo, K. et al. Targeted long-read methylation analysis using hybridization capture suitable for clinical specimens. Cell Rep. Methods 5, 101215 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Zhou, Y. et al. Metascape provides a biologist-oriented resource for the analysis of systems-level datasets. Nat. Commun. 10, 1523 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sakamoto, Y. et al. Long-read whole-genome methylation patterning using enzymatic base conversion and nanopore sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, e81 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Krueger, F. & Andrews, S. R. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics 27, 1571–1572 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Haga, Y. et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals the molecular implications of the stepwise progression of lung adenocarcinoma. Nat. Commun. 14, 8375 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Juhling, F. et al. metilene: fast and sensitive calling of differentially methylated regions from bisulfite sequencing data. Genome Res 26, 256–262 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Robinson, J. T. & Mesirov, J. P. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief. Bioinform. 14, 178–192 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  78. McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Wang, K., Li, M. & Hakonarson, H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e164 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Takano, Y. et al. Spatially resolved gene expression profiling of tumor microenvironment reveals key steps of lung adenocarcinoma development. Nat. Commun. 15, 10637 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Hao, Y. et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 293–304 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Jin, S. et al. Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nat. Commun. 12, 1088 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Bankhead, P. et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Science 7, 1–7 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Schmidt, U. et al. Cell detection with star-convex polygons. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 11071, 265–273 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Imamura, K. Abe, M. Satake, J. Zenkou, E. Sekimori, R. Fujinaga, and A. Gouda for their technical assistance. The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review. This work was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) grant number JP21ck0106700 (to S.N.), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI Grants) Number JP16H06279 (PAGS), JP22H04925 (PAGS), JP24K11738(to S.N.), JP23K27160 (to M.S.), as well as by Nikon Corporation. The supercomputing resource was provided by the Human Genome Center, the University of Tokyo (http://sc.hgc.jp/shirokane.html). Computational resources were also supplied by Kashiwa-no-ha Omics Gate (https://www.kog.or.jp/en/server.html).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Satoi Nagasawa, Keiko Kajiya.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan

    Satoi Nagasawa, Keiko Kajiya, Erina Ishikawa, Akinori Kanai, Ayako Suzuki, Akihiko Morozumi, Masahide Seki & Yutaka Suzuki

  2. Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan

    Satoi Nagasawa, Ai Motoyoshi, Tsuguo Iwatani & Koichiro Tsugawa

  3. Department of Breast Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan

    Satoi Nagasawa & Tatsuya Onishi

  4. Department of Pathology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan

    Manabu Kubota, Masaru Nakamura & Junki Koike

  5. Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan

    Akiyoshi Hoshino & Ichiro Maeda

  6. Designing and Development Department, Technology Solutions Sector, Healthcare Business Unit, Nikon Corporation, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan

    Akihiko Morozumi

  7. Investment Planning Department, Corporate Strategy, Nikon Corporation, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan

    Kenji Takatsuka

Authors
  1. Satoi Nagasawa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keiko Kajiya
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Erina Ishikawa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akinori Kanai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ayako Suzuki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ai Motoyoshi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tsuguo Iwatani
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Manabu Kubota
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Masaru Nakamura
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Tatsuya Onishi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Akiyoshi Hoshino
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ichiro Maeda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Akihiko Morozumi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Kenji Takatsuka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Junki Koike
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Masahide Seki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Koichiro Tsugawa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Yutaka Suzuki
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

S.N. and K.K collected the human samples, performed experiments and computational analyses, and generated all figures and tables. A.M., T.I., T.O., and K.T. aided in human sample collection. T.O. generated Fig. 2a.E.I. performed computational analyses. M.K. and M.N. assisted in the Xenium experiments. A.H., I.M., and J.K. conducted the pathological review. A.M. and K.T. developed viewer software. A.K. and A.S. offered advice and reviewed the manuscript. S.N., M.S., and Y.S. designed the project and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Satoi Nagasawa or Yutaka Suzuki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

A.M. and K.T. are employees of Nikon Corporation. The other authors do not have a competing interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures

Supplementary Tables

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nagasawa, S., Kajiya, K., Ishikawa, E. et al. Spatial gene expression analysis reveals drivers of extremely early lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. npj Breast Cancer (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-026-00897-1

Download citation

  • Received: 14 August 2025

  • Accepted: 14 January 2026

  • Published: 23 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41523-026-00897-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Content types
  • Journal Information
  • About the Editors
  • Open Access
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Breast Cancer (npj Breast Cancer)

ISSN 2374-4677 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer