Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Matters Arising
  • Published:

An Initial Upper Palaeolithic attribution is not empirically supported at Shiyu, northern China

Nature Ecology & Evolution volume 9, pages 34–37 (2025)Cite this article

Subjects

Matters Arising to this article was published on 29 October 2024

The Original Article was published on 18 January 2024

arising from: S.-X. Yang et al. Nature Ecology & Evolution https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02294-4 (2024)

Initial Upper Palaeolithic (IUP) assemblages are increasingly thought to be linked to the first widespread dispersal of Homo sapiens across Eurasia between 55 and 40 thousand years ago (kya cal bp). As a result, today the identification of IUP assemblages plays a key role in archaeological research focused on this key period, which is also characterized by the eventual disappearance of Neandertals and Denisovans from the fossil record. In a recent paper, Yang et al.1 claim to have identified the oldest and easternmost IUP at Shiyu, northern China, dated to ~45 kya cal bp and with this to transform knowledge of the routes and timing of the migration of H. sapiens in Asia. We argue, however, that this attribution is based on a biased sample of artefacts, the misuse of technological definitions and the misreading of stone artefacts central to their argument. Furthermore, it relies on the questionable assumption that the studied material (750 lithic artefacts from an original number of ~15,000) is a representative sample of a single assemblage. Although we recognize the value of technological re-evaluations of previously excavated assemblages, we believe that an IUP attribution is not empirically supported. In fact, it detracts attention from more pressing issues concerning the character of this technology, the association between lithics and personal ornaments and the overall integrity of the assemblage. Below, we highlight the key problems in the conclusions reached by Yang et al. 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Comparison of blade cores, points and platforms in Shiyu and IUP assemblages.

References

  1. Yang, S.-X. et al. Initial Upper Palaeolithic material culture by 45,000 years ago at Shiyu in northern China. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 552–563 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Derevianko, A. et al. The technology of early Upper Paleolithic lithic reduction in northern Mongolia: the Tolbor-4 site. Archaeol. Ethnol. Anthropol. Eurasia 29, 16–38 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zwyns, N. The Initial Upper Paleolithic in Central and East Asia: blade technology, cultural transmission, and implications for human dispersals. J. Paleolit. Archaeol. 4, 19 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rybin, E. P. Tools, beads, and migrations: specific cultural traits in the Initial Upper Paleolithic of Southern Siberia and Central Asia. Quat. Int. 347, 39–52 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Derevyanko, A. P., Petrin, V. T., Rybin, E. P. & Chevalkov, L. M. Paleolithic Complexes of the Stratified Part of the Kara-Bom Site (Mousterian/Upper Paleolithic) (Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 1998).

  6. Carmignani, L. & Soressi, M. Ahead of the times: blade and bladelet production associated with Neandertal remains at the Bau de l’Aubesier (Mediterranean France) between MIS 7 and MIS 5d. PaleoAnthropology 2023, 1–33 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, F., Kuhn, S. L., Chen, F. & Gao, X. Intra-assemblage variation in the macro-blade assemblage from the 1963 excavation at Shuidonggou locality 1, northern China, in the context of regional variation. PLoS ONE 15, e0234576 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Boëda, E. Le Concept Levallois: Variabilité Des Méthodes (CNRS Editions, 1994).

  9. Li, F. et al. A refutation of reported Levallois technology from Guanyindong Cave in south China. Natl Sci. Rev. 6, 1094–1096 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuhn, S. L. & Zwyns, N. Rethinking the initial Upper Paleolithic. Quat. Int. 347, 29–38 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Julien, M., David, F., Girard, M. & Roblin-Jouve, A. Le Châtelperronien de La Grotte Du Renne (Arcy-Sur-Cure, Yonne, France): Les Fouilles d’André Leroi-Gourhan (1949–1963) (Musée National de Préhistoire, 2019).

  12. Arrighi, S. et al. Bone tools, ornaments and other unusual objects during the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic transition in Italy. Quat. Int. 551, 169–187 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brantingham, P. J., Krivoshapkin, A., Jinzeng, L. & Tserendagva, Y. The Initial Upper Paleolithic in Northeast Asia. Curr. Anthropol. 42, 735–746 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Škrdla, P. The Bohunician in Moravia and adjoining regions. Archaeol. Ethnol. Anthropol. Eurasia 41, 2–13 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Usik, V. I., Rose, J. I., Hilbert, Y. H., Van Peer, P. & Marks, A. E. Nubian Complex reduction strategies in Dhofar, southern Oman. Quat. Int. 300, 244–266 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonilauri, S. Les Outils du Paléolithique Moyen, une Mémoire Technique Oubliée? Approche Techno-Fonctionnelle Appliquée à un Assemblage Lithique de Conception Levallois Provenant du Site d’Umm el Tlel (Syrie Centrale). PhD thesis, Univ. Paris Nanterre (2010).

Download references

Acknowledgements

L.C., I.D. and M.S. are funded by the Dutch Research Council (VI.C.191.07 awarded to M.S.).

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Leonardo Carmignani, Igor Djakovic.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands

    Leonardo Carmignani, Igor Djakovic & Marie Soressi

  2. Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Ministère de la Culture, PACEA, UMR 5199, Pessac, France

    Peiqi Zhang & Nicolas Zwyns

  3. CNRS UMR 5608 TRACES, Université Toulouse—Jean Jaurès, Toulouse, France

    Nicolas Teyssandier

  4. Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA

    Nicolas Zwyns

Authors
  1. Leonardo Carmignani
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Igor Djakovic
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peiqi Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nicolas Teyssandier
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nicolas Zwyns
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marie Soressi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.C. and I.D. wrote the original draft, with editorial and content support from M.S. N.Z. and P.Z. provided extra references. N.Z., P.Z. and N.T. contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Soressi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Ecology & Evolution thanks Robin Dennell and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carmignani, L., Djakovic, I., Zhang, P. et al. An Initial Upper Palaeolithic attribution is not empirically supported at Shiyu, northern China. Nat Ecol Evol 9, 34–37 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02548-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-024-02548-9

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing