Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

A modular mRNA platform for programmable induction of tumour-specific immunogenic cell death

Abstract

Messenger RNA (mRNA) therapeutics hold great promise for oncology but their efficacy is limited by systemic off-target effects and immunosuppressive tumour microenvironments. Here we present TITUR, a tumour-customizable mRNA nanomedicine platform that integrates tumour-customizable ionizable lipids (TIs) and tumour-specific untranslated regions (TURs) to enhance tumour-selective mRNA delivery and expression. This dual-engineered approach enables the precise intratumoural expression of 4HB, an immunogenic cell death-inducing protein, while mitigating systemic toxicities. Using murine models of immunologically cold tumours, including melanoma and triple-negative breast cancer, TITUR-mediated 4HB delivery induced tumour-specific immunogenic cell death, remodelled the tumour microenvironment and enhanced immune cell infiltration. When combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors, 4HB TITUR suppressed primary and metastatic tumour growth, while also exhibiting vaccine-like properties by reducing tumour recurrence and eliciting systemic antitumour immunity. Furthermore, it demonstrated a superior safety profile compared with conventional mRNA delivery methods. Our data indicate that TITUR may serve as a versatile approach to address the limitations of current immunotherapies and support the development of personalized mRNA nanomedicines.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: 4HB mRNA promotes ICD in vitro with greater potency compared to MLKL mRNA.
Fig. 2: High-throughput combinatorial screening identifies TI-LNPs with enhanced delivery to B16 and 4T1 tumours with reduced off-target delivery to the liver.
Fig. 3: TI-LNPs encapsulating 4HB mRNA inhibit tumour growth and promote an immunologically hot tumour immunophenotype.
Fig. 4: TURs restrict translation to tumours and reduce non-target expression of encoded genes.
Fig. 5: m4HB TITUR in combination with anti-PD-1 leads to a ‘vaccination’ effect in mice, stalling the progression of distal tumours and protecting against tumour recurrence.
Fig. 6: Combination therapy of m4HB TITUR and anti-PD-1 suppresses tumour growth in the 4T1-Fluc liver metastasis model, and CD8+ T cells, macrophages and γδ T cells play key roles in the antitumour response of the m4HB TITUR platform.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The main data supporting the findings of this study are available within this paper and its Supplementary Information. The raw and analysed datasets are too large to readily share publicly but are available for research purposes from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Rohner, E., Yang, R., Foo, K. S., Goedel, A. & Chien, K. R. Unlocking the promise of mRNA therapeutics. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1586–1600 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang, X. et al. The landscape of mRNA nanomedicine. Nat. Med. 28, 2273–2287 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson, L. A. et al. An mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2—preliminary report. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 1920–1931 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, C. et al. mRNA-based cancer therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Cancer 23, 526–543 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barbier, A. J., Jiang, A. Y., Zhang, P., Wooster, R. & Anderson, D. G. The clinical progress of mRNA vaccines and immunotherapies. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 840–854 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Frankiw, L., Baltimore, D. & Li, G. Alternative mRNA splicing in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 19, 675–687 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lorentzen, C. L., Haanen, J. B., Met, Ö & Svane, I. M. Clinical advances and ongoing trials of mRNA vaccines for cancer treatment. Lancet Oncol. 23, e450–e458 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dolgin, E. Personalized cancer vaccines pass first major clinical test. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 22, 607–609 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blagden, S. P. & Willis, A. E. The biological and therapeutic relevance of mRNA translation in cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 280–291 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Vitale, I., Shema, E., Loi, S. & Galluzzi, L. Intratumoral heterogeneity in cancer progression and response to immunotherapy. Nat. Med. 27, 212–224 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Martin, J. D., Cabral, H., Stylianopoulos, T. & Jain, R. K. Improving cancer immunotherapy using nanomedicines: progress, opportunities and challenges. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 17, 251–266 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Junttila, M. R. & de Sauvage, F. J. Influence of tumour micro-environment heterogeneity on therapeutic response. Nature 501, 346–354 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Johnson, D. B., Nebhan, C. A., Moslehi, J. J. & Balko, J. M. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors: long-term implications of toxicity. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 19, 254–267 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Hotz, C. et al. Local delivery of mRNA-encoded cytokines promotes antitumor immunity and tumor eradication across multiple preclinical tumor models. Sci. Transl. Med. 13, eabc7804 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hausser, J. & Alon, U. Tumour heterogeneity and the evolutionary trade-offs of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20, 247–257 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krysko, D. V. et al. Immunogenic cell death and DAMPs in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 860–875 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Galluzzi, L., Buqué, A., Kepp, O., Zitvogel, L. & Kroemer, G. Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 97–111 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Meier, P., Legrand, A. J., Adam, D. & Silke, J. Immunogenic cell death in cancer: targeting necroptosis to induce antitumour immunity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 24, 299–315 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Galon, J. & Bruni, D. Approaches to treat immune hot, altered and cold tumours with combination immunotherapies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 18, 197–218 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, F. et al. mRNA lipid nanoparticle-mediated pyroptosis sensitizes immunologically cold tumors to checkpoint immunotherapy. Nat. Commun. 14, 4223 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Li, Y. et al. Multifunctional oncolytic nanoparticles deliver self-replicating IL-12 RNA to eliminate established tumors and prime systemic immunity. Nat. Cancer 1, 882–893 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, D. et al. Enhancing CRISPR/Cas gene editing through modulating cellular mechanical properties for cancer therapy. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 777–787 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Hoecke, L. et al. Treatment with mRNA coding for the necroptosis mediator MLKL induces antitumor immunity directed against neo-epitopes. Nat. Commun. 9, 3417 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kon, E., Ad-El, N., Hazan-Halevy, I., Stotsky-Oterin, L. & Peer, D. Targeting cancer with mRNA–lipid nanoparticles: key considerations and future prospects. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 20, 739–754 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Gaur, A. et al. Characterization of microRNA expression levels and their biological correlates in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 67, 2456–2468 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Volinia, S. et al. A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 2257–2261 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Dhawan, A., Scott, J. G., Harris, A. L. & Buffa, F. M. Pan-cancer characterisation of microRNA across cancer hallmarks reveals microRNA-mediated downregulation of tumour suppressors. Nat. Commun. 9, 5228 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Feikin, D. R. et al. Duration of effectiveness of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease: results of a systematic review and meta-regression. Lancet 399, 924–944 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Vandenabeele, P., Bultynck, G. & Savvides, S. N. Pore-forming proteins as drivers of membrane permeabilization in cell death pathways. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 24, 312–333 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Pasparakis, M. & Vandenabeele, P. Necroptosis and its role in inflammation. Nature 517, 311–320 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hildebrand, J. M. et al. Activation of the pseudokinase MLKL unleashes the four-helix bundle domain to induce membrane localization and necroptotic cell death. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15072–15077 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Faramin Lashkarian, M. et al. MicroRNA-122 in human cancers: from mechanistic to clinical perspectives. Cancer Cell Int 23, 29 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hsu, S. H. et al. Essential metabolic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-tumorigenic functions of miR-122 in liver. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 2871–2883 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Galluzzi, L., Guilbaud, E., Schmidt, D., Kroemer, G. & Marincola, F. M. Targeting immunogenic cell stress and death for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 23, 445–460 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mensurado, S., Blanco-Domínguez, R. & Silva-Santos, B. The emerging roles of γδ T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 20, 178–191 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Mantovani, A., Allavena, P., Marchesi, F. & Garlanda, C. Macrophages as tools and targets in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 799–820 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Oliveira, G. & Wu, C. J. Dynamics and specificities of T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 23, 295–316 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Cho, Y. et al. Phosphorylation-driven assembly of the RIP1-RIP3 complex regulates programmed necrosis and virus-induced inflammation. Cell 137, 1112–1123 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Najafov, A., Chen, H. & Yuan, J. Necroptosis and cancer. Trends Cancer 3, 294–301 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim, S. et al. Improvement of therapeutic effect via inducing non-apoptotic cell death using mRNA-protection nanocage. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 13, 2400240 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Dondelinger, Y. et al. MLKL compromises plasma membrane integrity by binding to phosphatidylinositol phosphates. Cell Rep. 7, 971–981 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hänggi, K. et al. Interleukin-1α release during necrotic-like cell death generates myeloid-driven immunosuppression that restricts anti-tumor immunity. Cancer Cell 42, 2015–2031.e2011 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Seifert, L. et al. The necrosome promotes pancreatic oncogenesis via CXCL1 and Mincle-induced immune suppression. Nature 532, 245–249 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Dagogo-Jack, I. & Shaw, A. T. Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 15, 81–94 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Li, B. et al. Combinatorial design of nanoparticles for pulmonary mRNA delivery and genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1410–1415 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen, J. et al. Combinatorial design of ionizable lipid nanoparticles for muscle-selective mRNA delivery with minimized off-target effects. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2309472120 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Hewitt, S. L. et al. Durable anticancer immunity from intratumoral administration of IL-23, IL-36γ, and OX40L mRNAs. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaat9143 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Feng, Z. et al. An in vitro-transcribed circular RNA targets the mitochondrial inner membrane cardiolipin to ablate EIF4G2+PTBP1+ pan-adenocarcinoma. Nat. Cancer 5, 30–46 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Jain, R. et al. MicroRNAs enable mRNA therapeutics to selectively program cancer cells to self-destruct. Nucleic Acid Ther. 28, 285–296 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Xiao, Y. & Shi, J. Lipids and the emerging RNA medicines. Chem. Rev. 121, 12109–12111 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Eygeris, Y., Gupta, M., Kim, J. & Sahay, G. Chemistry of lipid nanoparticles for RNA delivery. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 2–12 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang, Y., Sun, C., Wang, C., Jankovic, K. E. & Dong, Y. Lipids and lipid derivatives for RNA delivery. Chem. Rev. 121, 12181–12277 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Miao, L. et al. Delivery of mRNA vaccines with heterocyclic lipids increases anti-tumor efficacy by STING-mediated immune cell activation. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1174–1185 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Khoury, M. K., Gupta, K., Franco, S. R. & Liu, B. Necroptosis in the pathophysiology of disease. Am. J. Pathol. 190, 272–285 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Xu, Y. et al. AGILE platform: a deep learning powered approach to accelerate LNP development for mRNA delivery. Nat. Commun. 15, 6305 (2024).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Charni-Natan, M. & Goldstein, I. Protocol for primary mouse hepatocyte isolation. STAR Protoc. 1, 100086 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Li, J., Yao, Q. & Liu, D. Hydrodynamic cell delivery for simultaneous establishment of tumor growth in mouse lung, liver and kidney. Cancer Biol. Ther. 12, 737–741 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the staff at STTARR and ARC at the University Health Network for their assistance with animal work. Special gratitude is extended to L. Radvanyi for providing the 4T1-Fluc cell line, and to J. Hu and P. Zhang for generously providing the reporter T-cell line. This work was supported by the Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation’s Invest in Research Grant, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (number RGPIN-2023-05124), the Canada Research Chairs Program (number CRC-2022-00575), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (numbers PJH-185722, PJT-190109, PJT-192011, PJT-195669), the Connaught Fund (number 514681), the J. P. Bickell Foundation (number 515159), New Frontiers in Research Fund—Exploration (number NFRFE-2023-00203) and the Canada Foundation for Innovation—John R. Evans Leaders Fund (number 43711).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.D., S.N.T. and B.L. conceived the study and designed the experiments. S.D., S.N.T., Y.X., F.G., N.C.S., D.X.W.C., L.H., M.S., M.Z., J.C., A.G., R.X.Z.L., T.L.Y., T.H., B.X.W., B.H.L. and B.L. performed the experiments and data analysis. S.D., S.N.T. and B.L. wrote and edited the paper. H.H.H. and B.L. acquired funding and supervised the project. All authors provided feedback and helped shape the research, data analysis and paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bowen Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

S.D., S.T., H.H.H. and B.L. have filed an invention disclosure for the TITUR platform. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Nanotechnology thanks Guideng Li and Michael Mitchell for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Tumour customized UTRs (TURs) improves therapeutic outcomes and of 4HB mRNA in B16 tumour models.

a, Summary of groups and experimental timeline for testing 4HB TI-LNPs or 4HB TITUR alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 in B16 tumour-bearing mice. b, Therapeutic efficacy and safety in B16 tumour models. Monitoring of B16 tumour size, shown as the mean and standard deviation at each timepoint, as well as the individual curves for each treatment group, for n=5 mice per group. Data are plotted as the mean ± s.d. c. Endpoint tumour size for the B16 model, shown as a box plot with the mean, maximum, and minimum measurements from n=5 mice per group. The endpoint represents the final tumour size monitoring day or once tumour size exceeded 1000 mm3. d. Weight changes relative to the mouse body weight on the first LNP injection day in the B16, for n=5 mice per group. Data are plotted as the mean ± s.d. e.Tissue sectioning and H&E staining of the liver of B16 models, as well as serum levels of liver damage markers, ALT and AST, at the endpoint of the study. Shown are box plots representing the mean, maximum, and minimum measurement in each organ with n=5 mice per group. Scale bar, 100 um. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. All data are plotted as the mean ± s.d.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Tumour customized UTRs (TURs) improves therapeutic outcomes and of 4HB mRNA in 4T1 tumour models.

a, Summary of groups and experimental timeline for testing 4HB TI-LNPs or 4HB TITUR alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 in 4T1-Fluc tumour-bearing mice. b, Monitoring of 4T1-Fluc tumour model based on changes in tumour luminescence signals with representative IVIS images of 4T1-Fluc tumour luminescence from Day 0 to Day 30 following the first LNP dose. Colour bar corresponds to luminescence intensity corresponding to this scale. c. Quantification of 4T1-Fluc tumour bioluminescence signal overtime, shown as individual curves for each mouse in a treatment group. d. Endpoint tumour luminescence for 4T1-Fluc models, shown as a box plot with the mean, maximum, and minimum measurements from n=5 mice per group. e. Weight changes relative to the mouse body weight on the first LNP injection day in the 4T1-Fluc tumour models. Data are plotted as the mean ± s.d. f. Tissue sectioning and H&E staining of the liver and spleen in 4T1-Fluc models, as well as serum levels of liver damage markers. Scale bar, 100 um. g. ALT and AST, at the endpoint of the study. Shown are box plots representing the mean, maximum, and minimum measurement in each organ with n=5 mice per group. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Cancer vaccination effect of TITUR-B16 LNPs in bilateral B16 tumour model.

a, Tumour growth on both the treated and untreated flanks was monitored in B16 tumour-bearing mice following treatment with PBS, free 4HB mRNA, anti-PD-1, m4HBCtrlTIB16-2+anti-PD-1, m4HB TITURB16, m4HB TITURB16+anti-PD-1. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation for each group (n = 5), along with individual tumour growth curves for each mouse. b, Violin plots representing the percentage of each immune cell population in the tumour, spleen, and lymph nodes with n=5 mice per treatment group. c. Heatmaps showing cytokine levels of tumour tissues at the endpoint of the B16 dual tumour. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Cancer vaccination effect of TITUR-4T1 LNPs in 4T1 recurrence tumour model.

a, Tumour luminescence monitoring for primary and rechallenge 4T1-Fluc orthotopic tumours. Data is shown as IVIS images for each mouse, with n=5 mice per treatment group. Colour bar corresponds to luminescence intensity corresponding to this scale. b, Violin plots representing the percentage of each immune cell population in the tumour, spleen, and lymph nodes with n=5 mice per treatment group. c. Cytokine levels for each mouse per treatment group are shown in the heatmap, with n=5 mice per group. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons.

Source data

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dong, S., Tsai, S.N., Xu, Y. et al. A modular mRNA platform for programmable induction of tumour-specific immunogenic cell death. Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 1856–1870 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-025-02045-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-025-02045-5

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research