Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Eukaryotic ADCY7 catalyzes the production of c-di-AMP to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome

Abstract

Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonists cause activation of nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasomes but the mechanism is not clear. We found that there is a second signal downstream of TLR9 that induces NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Through screening, adenylate cyclase 7 (ADCY7) was found to be an essential regulator of this process. In cells with Adcy7 deficiency, TLR9 agonists were no longer able to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome. ADCY7 not only catalyzes the generation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) but also catalyzes the synthesis of its dimeric form (c-di-AMP). Moreover, c-di-AMP promotes assembly and maturation of the inflammasome by directly binding to NLRP3. Cells with Adcy7 deletion or mutations impacting enzymatic activity cannot produce c-di-AMP. The survival of Adcy7-deficient mice in acute liver injury was also improved. In summary, we found that ADCY7 is required for NLRP3 inflammasome activation downstream of TLR9 by catalyzing the generation of c-di-AMP, which may serve as a target for controlling inflammatory responses in sterile infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: TLR9-induced inflammasome activation needs a second signal.
Fig. 2: ADCY7 is screened out as an essential regulator for TLR9-induced inflammasome activation.
Fig. 3: ADCY7 catalyzes the production of c-di-AMP.
Fig. 4: ADCY7 activates inflammasome through c-di-AMP.
Fig. 5: TLR9 binds and activates ADCY7.
Fig. 6: ADCY7 deficiency ameliorates damages caused by TLR9 activators.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and Supplementary Information. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Fu, J. & Wu, H. Structural mechanisms of NLRP3 inflammasome assembly and activation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 41, 301–316 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. de Carvalho Ribeiro, M. & Szabo, G. Role of the inflammasome in liver disease. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 17, 345–365 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharma, B. R. & Kanneganti, T. D. NLRP3 inflammasome in cancer and metabolic diseases. Nat. Immunol. 22, 550–559 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Latz, E., Xiao, T. S. & Stutz, A. Activation and regulation of the inflammasomes. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13, 397–411 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. de Sá, K. S. G. et al. Gasdermin-D activation promotes NLRP3 activation and host resistance to Leishmania infection. Nat. Commun. 14, 1049 (2023).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Herrmann, B. I., Grayczyk, J. P. & Brodsky, I. E. Collab or cancel? Bacterial influencers of inflammasome signaling. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 77, 451–477 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gu, W., Zeng, Q., Wang, X., Jasem, H. & Ma, L. Acute lung injury and the NLRP3 inflammasome. J. Inflamm. Res. 17, 3801–3813 (2024).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bauernfeind, F. G. et al. Cutting edge: NF-κB activating pattern recognition and cytokine receptors license NLRP3 inflammasome activation by regulating NLRP3 expression. J. Immunol. 183, 787–791 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng, X., Wan, J. & Tan, G. The mechanisms of NLRP3 inflammasome/pyroptosis activation and their role in diabetic retinopathy. Front. Immunol. 14, 1151185 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Krieg, A. M. et al. CpG motifs in bacterial DNA trigger direct B-cell activation. Nature 374, 546–549 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vollmer, J. & Krieg, A. M. Immunotherapeutic applications of CpG oligodeoxynucleotide TLR9 agonists. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 61, 195–204 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Imaeda, A. B. et al. Acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in mice is dependent on Tlr9 and the Nalp3 inflammasome. J. Clin. Invest. 119, 305–314 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, Q. et al. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature 464, 104–107 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo, R. et al. Targeting adenylate cyclase family: new concept of targeted cancer therapy. Front. Oncol. 12, 829212 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Steer, M. L. Adenyl cyclase. Ann. Surg. 182, 603–609 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang, L. I., Collins, J., Davis, R., Fraser, I. D. & Sternweis, P. C. Regulation of cAMP responses by the G12/13 pathway converges on adenylyl cyclase VII. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23429–23439 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanchez-Collado, J., Lopez, J. J., Jardin, I., Salido, G. M. & Rosado, J. A. Cross-talk between the adenylyl cyclase/cAMP pathway and Ca2+ homeostasis. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 179, 73–116 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Devasani, K. & Yao, Y. Expression and functions of adenylyl cyclases in the CNS. Fluids Barriers CNS 19, 23 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Xia, Z., Choi, E. J., Wang, F., Blazynski, C. & Storm, D. R. Type I calmodulin-sensitive adenylyl cyclase is neural specific. J. Neurochem. 60, 305–311 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dou, H. et al. Calcium influx activates adenylyl cyclase 8 for sustained insulin secretion in rat pancreatic beta cells. Diabetologia 58, 324–333 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sadana, R. & Dessauer, C. W. Physiological roles for G protein-regulated adenylyl cyclase isoforms: insights from knockout and overexpression studies. Neurosignals 17, 5–22 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dessauer, C. W. et al. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CI. Structures and small molecule modulators of mammalian adenylyl cyclases. Pharmacol. Rev. 69, 93–139 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Simonds, W. F. G protein regulation of adenylate cyclase. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 20, 66–73 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, H. et al. cAMP-PKA/EPAC signaling and cancer: the interplay in tumor microenvironment. J. Hematol. Oncol. 17, 5 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, G. S. et al. The calcium-sensing receptor regulates the NLRP3 inflammasome through Ca2+ and cAMP. Nature 492, 123–127 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdul-Sater, A. A. et al. Cyclic-di-GMP and cyclic-di-AMP activate the NLRP3 inflammasome. EMBO Rep. 14, 900–906 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Commichau, F. M., Gibhardt, J., Halbedel, S., Gundlach, J. & Stülke, J. A delicate connection: c-di-AMP affects cell integrity by controlling osmolyte transport. Trends Microbiol. 26, 175–185 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kalia, D. et al. Nucleotide, c-di-GMP, c-di-AMP, cGMP, cAMP, (p)ppGpp signaling in bacteria and implications in pathogenesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 305–341 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Barker, J. R. et al. STING-dependent recognition of cyclic di-AMP mediates type I interferon responses during Chlamydia trachomatis infection. mBio 4, e00018-13 (2013).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lam, K. C. et al. Microbiota triggers STING-type I IFN-dependent monocyte reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment. Cell. 184, 5338–5356.e21 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, Y. et al. cGLRs are a diverse family of pattern recognition receptors in innate immunity. Cell. 186, 3261–3276.e20 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Novotná, B. et al. Enzymatic preparation of 2′-5′,3′-5′-cyclic dinucleotides, their binding properties to stimulator of interferon genes adaptor protein, and structure/activity correlations. J. Med. Chem. 62, 10676–10690 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu, J. & Chen, Z. J. Innate immune sensing and signaling of cytosolic nucleic acids. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 32, 461–488 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Blander, J. M. & Barbet, G. Exploiting vita-PAMPs in vaccines. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 41, 128–136 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Swanson, K. V., Deng, M. & Ting, J. P. The NLRP3 inflammasome: molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 19, 477–489 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Di Virgilio, F., Dal Ben, D., Sarti, A. C., Giuliani, A. L. & Falzoni, S. The P2X7 receptor in infection and inflammation. Immunity 47, 15–31 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Akbal, A. et al. How location and cellular signaling combine to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 19, 1201–1214 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Schmacke, N. A. et al. IKKβ primes inflammasome formation by recruiting NLRP3 to the trans-Golgi network. Immunity 55, 2271–2284 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Di, A. et al. The TWIK2 potassium efflux channel in macrophages mediates NLRP3 inflammasome-induced inflammation. Immunity 49, 56–65 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Clivio, P., Coantic-Castex, S. & Guillaume, D. (3′-5′)-Cyclic dinucleotides: synthetic strategies and biological potential. Chem. Rev. 113, 7354–7401 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hopfner, K. P. & Hornung, V. Molecular mechanisms and cellular functions of cGAS–STING signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 501–521 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Millman, A., Melamed, S., Amitai, G. & Sorek, R. Diversity and classification of cyclic-oligonucleotide-based anti-phage signalling systems. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 1608–1615 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Liu, Q. et al. The TET3 inflammasome senses unique long HSV-1 proteins for virus particle budding from the nucleus. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 21, 1322–1334 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Qian, Y. et al. A VgrG2b fragment cleaved by caspase-11/4 promotes Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection through suppressing the NLRP3 inflammasome. eLife 13, RP99939 (2025).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Li, W. et al. Adipose triglyceride lipase suppresses noncanonical inflammasome by hydrolyzing LPS. Nat. Chem. Biol. 20, 1434–1442 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (JG23028), National Natural Science Foundation of China (92369104, 82271790, 92169113 and 22174003), National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFA1300202, 2022YFC2302900 and 2022YFA1304500), Strategic Priority Research Programs of the CAS (XDB29020000), Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the CAS (ZDBS-LY-SM025), CAS Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (YSBR-010), Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (to P.X.) and Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the CAS (to S.W.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Q.L. and Z.T. designed and performed the experiments and analyzed the data. Y.Q., C.W., C.K., M.L., X.G., Y.Z., X.C., C.R., K.W., L.B., L.W., D.J., S.W. and X.L. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. P.X. initiated the study, designed and performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shuo Wang, Xiaoyun Liu or Pengyan Xia.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Chemical Biology thanks Fabian Commichau, Zhu Liang and Xinshou Ouyang for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Ion flux is not required for TLR9-induced inflammasome.

(a) Tlr9+/+ and Tlr9–/– BMDM cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cell viability was determined by an ATP quantification assay in cell pellets. (b) Tlr9–/– BMDM cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. Otherwise, cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN and 1 μg/ml LPS for 6 h, followed by culture media replacement with PBS containing 10 μM nigericin for 30 min. Cell viability was determined by an ATP quantification assay in cell pellets. (c) Tlr9+/+ and Tlr9–/– BMDM cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. Intracellular potassium levels were determined through an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry and shown as relative levels. d–f, Wild-type BMDM cells primed with 1 μg/ml LPS for 3 h were stimulated with 10 μM nigericin for 30 min. 50 mM KCl was added to the medium 30 min before the addition of nigericin. Otherwise, cells were co-stimulated with 1 μM CpG-ODN and 50 mM KCl for 6 h. (d) Cell culture supernatants were collected for an ELISA assay to determine the secreted IL-1β protein levels. (e) Cytotoxicity was determined by LDH release assay in cell culture supernatants. (f) Cell viability was determined by an ATP quantification assay in cell pellets. g, h, Wild-type BMDM cells primed with 1 μg/ml LPS for 3 h were stimulated with 2 mM ATP for 30 min. 50 mM KCl was added to the medium 30 min before the addition of ATP. Otherwise, cells were co-stimulated with 1 μM CpG-ODN and 50 mM KCl for 6 h. (g) Cytotoxicity was determined by LDH release assay in cell culture supernatants. (h) Cell viability was determined by an ATP quantification assay in cell pellets. In a–h, data were shown as means ± SD (n = 4, biological replicates). Two-tailed Student’s t-test were used.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 CpG-ODN stimulation activates NLRP3 inflammasome.

(a) Tlr9+/+ and Tlr9–/– BMDM cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cells were stained with a labeling calcium indicator Fluo-4 and calcium levels were quantified and shown as relative to that of controls. b–d, Wild-type BMDM cells primed with 1 μg/ml LPS for 3 h were stimulated with 10 μM nigericin for 30 min. Otherwise, cells were stimulated with 1 μM CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cells were also treated with or without 100 μM 2-APB. (b) Cell culture supernatants were collected for an ELISA assay to determine the secreted IL-1β protein levels. (c) Cytotoxicity was determined by LDH release assay in cell culture supernatants. (d) Cell viability was determined by an ATP quantification assay in cell pellets. e–h, Wild-type BMDM cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with antibody against NLRP3. Precipitates were thermal-inactivated through incubation at 80 °C for 20 min. Thermal-inactivated precipitates were transfected into LPS-primed BMDM cells using a cationic lipid transfection reagent DOTAP for 6 h. (e) Cells were lysed and immunoblotted. (f) Cell culture supernatants were collected for an ELISA assay to determine the secreted IL-1β protein levels. (g) Cytotoxicity was determined by LDH release assay in cell culture supernatants. (h) Cell viability was determined by an ATP quantification assay in cell pellets. In a–d and f–h, data were shown as means ± SD (n = 4, biological replicates). Two-tailed Student’s t-test were used.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 3 ADCY7 is positively involved in the TLR9-induced inflammasome.

a–c, iBMDM cells infected with lentiviruses carrying Cas9 and an sgRNA against the indicated genes or a scrambled control one (Ctrl) were stimulated with 1 μM CpG-ODN for 6 h. (a) Cell culture supernatants were collected for an ELISA assay to determine the secreted IL-1β protein levels. (b) Cytotoxicity was determined by LDH release assay in cell culture supernatants. (c) Cell viability was determined by an ATP quantification assay in cell pellets. (d) Adcy7+/+ and Adcy7–/– BMDM cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cell viability was determined by an ATP quantification assay in cell pellets. (e) Adcy7+/+ and Adcy7–/– BMDM cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or 1 μg/ml E. coli genomic DNA for 6 h. Cells were lysed and immunoblotted. In a–c, data were shown as means ± SD (n = 3, biological replicates). In d, data were shown as means ± SD (n = 4, biological replicates). Two-tailed Student’s t-test were used.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 ADCY7 enzymatic activity is required for inflammasome activation.

a–c, Adcy7–/– BMDM cells were rescued with wild-type or enzymatic-mutant ADCY7 without transmembrane domains. Cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. (a) Cell culture supernatants were collected for an ELISA assay to determine the secreted IL-1β protein levels. (b) Cytotoxicity was determined by LDH release assay in cell culture supernatants. (c) Cell viability was determined by an ATP quantification assay in cell pellets. d–g, Macrophages derived from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were infected with lentiviruses carrying Cas9 and an sgRNA against human ADCY7. (d) The efficiencies of gene deletion were examined through immunoblotting. ADCY7+/+ and ADCY7–/– human macrophages were stimulated with 1 µg/ml E. coli genomic DNA for 6 h. (e) Cell culture supernatants were collected for an ELISA assay to determine the secreted IL-1β protein levels. (f) Cytotoxicity was determined by LDH release assay in cell culture supernatants. (g) Cell viability was determined by an ATP quantification assay in cell pellets. In a–c and e–g, data were shown as means ± SD (n = 4, biological replicates). Two-tailed Student’s t-test were used.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 cAMP is not the second messenger that activates the NLRP3 inflammasome.

(a) Mass spectrometry of a c-di-AMP standard was shown. (b) Wild-type BMDM cells were infected with lentiviruses carrying Cas9 and the indicated sgRNAs for 3 days. Cells were then stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h, followed by ELISA assays for c-di-AMP levels. (c) Recombinant GST or the indicated ADCY7 isoforms were incubated with 10 mM ATP for 2 h, followed by ELISA assays for c-di-AMP levels. (d) Plasmids encoding GST-tagged dacA from Listeria and ADCY7 were transfected into E. coli strain BL21, followed by protein expression induction with 1 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for 6 h. Bacteria were lysed and subjected to ELISA assays for c-di-AMP levels. (e) Recombinant dgcN from E. coli and ADCY7 were incubated with saline or 10 mM GTP for 2 h, followed by ELISA assays for c-di-GMP levels. (f) Protein structures of Listeria dacA and ATP (PDB: 4rv7) were aligned with mouse ADCY7 (Alphafold: AF-P51829-F1-v4) (left panel). c-di-AMP was docked into the mouse ADCY7 structure (right panel). In b–e, data were shown as means ± SD (n = 4, biological replicates). Two-tailed Student’s t-test were used.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 ADCY7 catalyzes c-di-AMP production.

(a) c-di-AMP was docked into the mouse ADCY7 or mouse ADCY4 structure (Alphafold: AF-Q91WF3-F1-v4) and vacuum electrostatics was shown. (b) Adcy7–/– BMDM cells were rescued with wild-type or enzymatic-mutant ADCY7 without transmembrane domains. Cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or 1 μg/ml E. coli genomic DNA for 6 h. Cells were lysed and the intracellular c-di-AMP levels were determined by an ELISA assay. (c) Human macrophages were infected with lentiviruses carrying Cas9 and an sgRNA against human ADCY7. ADCY7+/+ and ADCY7–/– human macrophages were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cells were lysed and the intracellular c-di-AMP levels were determined by an ELISA assay using an antibody specific for c-di-AMP. (d) ADCY7+/+ and ADCY7–/– human macrophages were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or 1 μg/ml E. coli genomic DNA for 6 h. Cells were lysed and the intracellular c-di-AMP levels were determined by an ELISA assay using an antibody specific for c-di-AMP. (e) ADCY7–/– human macrophages were rescued with wild-type or enzymatic-mutant ADCY7 without transmembrane domains. Cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or 1 μg/ml E. coli genomic DNA for 6 h. Cells were lysed and the intracellular c-di-AMP levels were determined by an ELISA assay using an antibody specific for c-di-AMP. (f) Wild-type BMDM cells primed with 1 μg/ml LPS for 3 h were stimulated with 10 μM nigericin for 30 min. Otherwise, cells were stimulated with 1 μM CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cells were lysed and the intracellular c-di-AMP levels were determined by an ELISA assay using an antibody specific for c-di-AMP. (g) Wild-type human macrophages primed with 1 μg/ml LPS for 3 h were stimulated with 10 μM nigericin for 30 min. Otherwise, cells were stimulated with 1 μM CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cells were lysed and the intracellular c-di-AMP levels were determined by an ELISA assay using an antibody specific for c-di-AMP. In b–g, data were shown as means ± SD (n = 4, biological replicates). Two-tailed Student’s t-test were used.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 c-di-AMP binds NLRP3.

(a) Biotin or biotin-labelled c-di-AMP were incubated with BMDM cell lysates for 4 h, followed by precipitation using streptavidin beads. Precipitates were immunoblotted with antibodies against NLRP3 and two known NLRP3 binding partners. (b) Wild-type BMDM cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with a control IgG or antibody against NLRP3. Precipitates were subjected to an ELISA assay for determining the c-di-AMP levels. (c) BMDM cells from Nlrp3+/+ and Nlrp3–/– mice were primed with 1 μg/ml LPS for 3 h, followed by transfection of 10 μg/ml c-di-AMP using DOTAP for 6 h. Cells were lysed and pellets were crosslinked with 2 mM disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) for 30 min at room temperature. Crosslinked pellets were dissolved in 1 X Laemmli buffer and immunoblotted with antibody against ASC. Cell lysates were also immunoblotted as indicated. (d) Biotin-labelled c-di-AMP were incubated with recombinant NLRP3 protein for 2 h and crosslinked by ultraviolet, followed by precipitation using antibody against NLRP3. Precipitates were immunoblotted with antibody against biotin. (e) Wild-type BMDM cells were transfected with saline or 10 μg/ml c-di-AMP using DOTAP for 6 h, followed by immunostaining with antibody against NLRP3. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. (f) Plasmids encoding NLRP3 and ADCY7 without transmembrane domains were co-transfected into HEK293T cells for 24 h, followed by immunoprecipitation with a control IgG or antibody against NLRP3. Precipitates were immunoblotted as indicated. (g) Plasmids encoding FLAG-tagged NLRP3 PYD domain (aa 1–134) and ADCY7 without transmembrane domains were co-transfected into HEK293T cells for 24 h, followed by immunoprecipitation with a control IgG or antibody against FLAG. Precipitates were immunoblotted as indicated. In e, scale bar, 10 μm. In b, data were shown as means ± SD (n = 4, biological replicates). Two-tailed Student’s t-test were used.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 ADCY7 deficiency hampers NLRP3 inflammasome.

(a) Adcy7–/– BMDM cells were rescued with lentiviruses carrying the indicated ADCY7 isoforms for 3 days. Cells were then stimulated with 1 μM CpG-ODN for 6 h and immunostained with antibodies against TLR9 and ADCY7. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. (b) Adcy7–/– BMDM cells rescued with wild-type or enzymatic-mutant ADCY7 were stimulated with 1 μM CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with a control IgG or antibody against TLR9. Precipitates were immunoblotted as indicated. (c) Adcy7–/– BMDM cells rescued with the indicated ADCY7 truncations were stimulated with 1 μM CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with a control IgG or antibody against TLR9. Precipitates were immunoblotted as indicated. (d) Wild-type BMDM cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. Otherwise, cells were transfected with 10 μg/ml cGAMP using DOTAP for 6 h. Cells were lysed and run on a Native-PAGE for STING dimerization. Cells lysates were also immunoblotted as indicated. (e) Wild-type, Adcy7–/– and Tlr9–/– mice (n = 4 for each group) were intraperitoneally injected with D-GalN (20 mg per mice) and CpG-ODN (20 nmol per mice). Meanwhile, mice were injected with 100 nmol c-di-AMP through hydrodynamic tail vein injection. Serum levels of IL-1β were determined 6 h post injection. In a, scale bar, 10 µm. In e, data were shown as means ± SD (n = 4, biological replicates). Two-tailed Student’s t-test were used.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 ADCY7 catalyzes c-di-AMP for inflammasome activation.

(a) Tlr9+/+ and Tlr9–/– BMDM cells were stimulated with 2 μg/ml nuclear non-CpG DNA, nuclear CpG DNA, mitochondrial DNA from HEK293T cells or E. coli genomic DNA for 6 h, followed by ELISA assays to determine the secreted IL-1β protein levels. (b) Adcy7–/– BMDM cells rescued with the indicated ADCY7 truncations were stimulated with 1 μM CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cells were lysed and immunoprecipitated with a control IgG or antibody against TLR9. Precipitates were subjected to an ELISA assay for determining c-di-AMP levels. c–e, Adcy7–/– BMDM cells rescued with the indicated ADCY7 truncations were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. (c) Cells were lysed and immunoblotted. (d) Cell culture supernatants were collected for an ELISA assay to determine the secreted IL-1β protein levels. (e) Cytotoxicity was determined by LDH release assay in cell culture supernatants. (f) Adcy7–/– BMDM cells rescued with the indicated ADCY7 truncations were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cell viability was determined by an ATP quantification assay in cell pellets. In a, b and d–f, data were shown as means ± SD (n = 4, biological replicates). Two-tailed Student’s t-test were used.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 10 ADCY7 is involved in sterile inflammation.

(a) Wild-type, Adcy7–/–, Nlrp3–/– and Tlr9–/– mice were intraperitoneally injected with CpG-ODN (20 nmol per mice) for 6 h. Cell viability was determined by an ATP quantification assay in cell pellets. (b) Peritoneal macrophages were collected from wild-type, Adcy7–/–, Nlrp3–/– and Tlr9–/– mice. Cells were stimulated with 1 μM control ODN or CpG-ODN for 6 h. Cell culture supernatants were collected for an ELISA assay to determine the secreted IL-1β protein levels. (c) A scheme for APAP stimulation was shown. df, Wild-type, Adcy7–/–, Nlrp3–/– and Tlr9–/– mice (n = 12) were intraperitoneally injected with 500 mg/kg APAP post a starvation of 15 h. (d) Survivals of mice were monitored for the indicated time points. Serum levels of (e) IL-1β and (f) transaminase (ALT) were determined 12 h post injection. In a, b and e, f, data were shown as means ± SD (n = 4, biological replicates). Two-tailed Student’s t-test were used.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables 1 and 2, Figs. 1–5 and source data for supplementary figures.

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 5

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Fig. 6

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 2

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 9

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 9

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 10

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Q., Tang, Z., Qian, Y. et al. Eukaryotic ADCY7 catalyzes the production of c-di-AMP to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome. Nat Chem Biol 21, 1283–1291 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-025-01919-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-025-01919-y

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing