Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Structural basis for the catalytic mechanism of human lipid phosphate phosphatases

Abstract

Lipid phosphate phosphatases (LPPs) catalyze the dephosphorylation of a broad range of bioactive lipid phosphates, including lysophosphatidic acid and sphingosine-1-phosphate, playing essential roles in embryonic vasculogenesis, cell differentiation and inflammation. Here we present the cryo-electron microscopic structure of human LPP1 as a tetramer with C4 symmetry. We capture the phosphohistidine intermediate state by using vanadate as a phosphate analog, where vanadate is coordinated by positively charged residues from three conserved motifs (C1, C2 and C3). Structural investigations of LPP1 variants with mutations in two catalytic histidine residues confirm that the histidine in the C2 motif facilitates phosphate bond cleavage. Enzymatic assays validate our structural observations. Additionally, a phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) molecule was discovered in the LPP1 structure, underscoring a potential regulatory role for PIP2 in the catalytic activity of LPP1.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Structural determination of human LPP1.
Fig. 2: Lipid-stabilized tetramerization of LPP1.
Fig. 3: The complex structure between LPP1 and vanadate.
Fig. 4: Structures of the LPA-bound and (PO4·MAG)-bound states.
Fig. 5: Structural comparison among LPP1-R, LPP1-C2M, LPP1-C3M and LPP1-V.
Fig. 6: PIP2 regulates the catalytic activity of LPP1.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The atomic coordinates of LPP1-R, LPP1-C2M, LPP1-C3M, LPP1-V and LPP1-C3M (nanodisc) have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org) under accession codes 9L0I, 9L0O, 9L0U, 9L0S and 9VL3. The corresponding electron microscopy map has been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pdbe/emdb/) under accession codes EMD-62715, EMD-62720, EMD-62723, EMD-62722 and EMD-65153. Data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Tang, X. Y., Benesch, M. G. K. & Brindley, D. N. Lipid phosphate phosphatases and their roles in mammalian physiology and pathology. J. Lipid Res. 56, 2048–2060 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Jamal, Z., Martin, A., Gomez-Munoz, A. & Brindley, D. N. Plasma membrane fractions from rat liver contain a phosphatidate phosphohydrolase distinct from that in the endoplasmic reticulum and cytosol. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 2988–2996 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, N., Copeland, N. G., Gilbert, D. J., Jenkins, N. A. & Gridley, T. Cloning, expression, and chromosomal localization of a mouse gene homologous to the germ cell migration regulator wunen and to type 2 phosphatidic acid phosphatases. Genomics 63, 142–144 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kai, M., Wada, I., Imai, S., Sakane, F. & Kanoh, H. Cloning and characterization of two human isozymes of Mg2+-independent phosphatidic acid phosphatase. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 24572–24578 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hooks, S. B., Ragan, S. P. & Lynch, K. R. Identification of a novel human phosphatidic acid phosphatase type 2 isoform. FEBS Lett. 427, 188–192 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts, R., Sciorra, V. A. & Morris, A. J. Human type 2 phosphatidic acid phosphohydrolases. Substrate specificity of the type 2a, 2b, and 2c enzymes and cell surface activity of the 2a isoform. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 22059–22067 (1998).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ren, H. et al. Lipid phosphate phosphatase (LPP3) and vascular development. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1831, 126–132 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, N., Sundberg, J. P. & Gridley, T. Mice mutant for Ppap2c, a homolog of the germ cell migration regulator wunen, are viable and fertile. Genesis 27, 137–140 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Escalante-Alcalde, D. et al. The lipid phosphatase LPP3 regulates extra-embryonic vasculogenesis and axis patterning. Development 130, 4623–4637 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jia, Y. J., Kai, M., Wada, I., Sakane, F. & Kanoh, H. Differential localization of lipid phosphate phosphatases 1 and 3 to cell surface subdomains in polarized MDCK cells. FEBS Lett. 552, 240–246 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishikawa, T., Kai, M., Wada, I. & Kanoh, H. Cell surface activities of the human type 2b phosphatidic acid phosphatase. J. Biochem. 127, 645–651 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Geraldo, L. H. M. et al. Role of lysophosphatidic acid and its receptors in health and disease: novel therapeutic strategies. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 45 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bryan, A. M. & Del Poeta, M. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors and innate immunity. Cell Microbiol. 20, e12836 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Hoose, P. M. et al. Lipid phosphate phosphatase 3 in smooth muscle cells regulates angiotensin II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm formation. Sci. Rep. 12, 5664 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanchez-Sanchez, R. et al. Lack of lipid phosphate phosphatase-3 in embryonic stem cells compromises neuronal differentiation and neurite outgrowth. Dev. Dyn. 241, 953–964 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tripathi, H. et al. Myeloid-specific deletion of lipid Plpp3 (phosphate phosphatase 3) increases cardiac inflammation after myocardial infarction. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 43, 379–381 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nema, R., Shrivastava, A. & Kumar, A. Prognostic role of lipid phosphate phosphatases in non-smoker, lung adenocarcinoma patients. Comput. Biol. Med. 129, 104141 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tang, X. et al. Lipid phosphate phosphatase-2 promotes tumor growth through increased c-Myc expression. Theranostics 12, 5675–5690 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Benesch, M. G. K. et al. Decreased lipid phosphate phosphatase 1/3 and increased lipid phosphate phosphatase 2 expression in the human breast cancer tumor microenvironment promotes tumor progression and immune system evasion. Cancers (Basel) 15, 2299 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang, X. et al. Lipid phosphate phosphatase-1 expression in cancer cells attenuates tumor growth and metastasis in mice. J. Lipid Res. 55, 2389–2400 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Vishwakarma, S. et al. Downregulation of lipid phosphate phosphatase 3 correlates with tumor-infiltrating immune cells in oral cancer. Cureus 14, e23553 (2022).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeng, Y., Cao, S., Li, N., Tang, J. & Lin, G. Identification of key lipid metabolism-related genes in Alzheimer’s disease. Lipids Health Dis. 22, 155 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Smyth, S. S., Kraemer, M., Yang, L., Van Hoose, P. & Morris, A. J. Roles for lysophosphatidic acid signaling in vascular development and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1865, 158734 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jose, A. & Kienesberger, P. C. Autotaxin-LPA-LPP3 axis in energy metabolism and metabolic disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 9575 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Corbi, S. C. T. et al. Expression profile of genes potentially associated with adequate glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Diabetes Res. 2017, 2180819 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tang, X., McMullen, T. P. W. & Brindley, D. N. Increasing the low lipid phosphate phosphatase 1 activity in breast cancer cells decreases transcription by AP-1 and expressions of matrix metalloproteinases and cyclin D1/D3. Theranostics 9, 6129–6142 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Stukey, J. & Carman, G. M. Identification of a novel phosphatase sequence motif. Protein Sci. 6, 469–472 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Barila, D. et al. The Dri 42 gene, whose expression is up-regulated during epithelial differentiation, encodes a novel endoplasmic reticulum resident transmembrane protein. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 29928–29936 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Messerschmidt, A. & Wever, R. X-ray structure of a vanadium-containing enzyme: chloroperoxidase from the fungus Curvularia inaequalis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 392–396 (1996).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ishikawa, K., Mihara, Y., Gondoh, K., Suzuki, E. & Asano, Y. X-ray structures of a novel acid phosphatase from Escherichia blattae and its complex with the transition-state analog molybdate. EMBO J. 19, 2412–2423 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sigal, Y. J., McDermott, M. I. & Morris, A. J. Integral membrane lipid phosphatases/phosphotransferases: common structure and diverse functions. Biochem. J. 387, 281–293 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fan, J., Jiang, D., Zhao, Y., Liu, J. & Zhang, X. C. Crystal structure of lipid phosphatase Escherichia coli phosphatidylglycerophosphate phosphatase B. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7636–7640 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Long, J. S., Pyne, N. J. & Pyne, S. Lipid phosphate phosphatases form homo- and hetero-oligomers: catalytic competency, subcellular distribution and function. Biochem. J 411, 371–377 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Vardakou, M., Salmon, M., Faraldos, J. A. & O’Maille, P. E. Comparative analysis and validation of the malachite green assay for the high throughput biochemical characterization of terpene synthases. MethodsX 1, 187–196 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang, Q. X., Pilquil, C. S., Dewald, J., Berthiaume, L. G. & Brindley, D. N. Identification of structurally important domains of lipid phosphate phosphatase-1: implications for its sites of action. Biochem. J. 345, 181–184 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Carman, G. M., Deems, R. A. & Dennis, E. A. Lipid signaling enzymes and surface dilution kinetics. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18711–18714 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tunyasuvunakool, K. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome. Nature 596, 590–596 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Simon, M. F. et al. Expression of ectolipid phosphate phosphohydrolases in 3T3F442A preadipocytes and adipocytes. Involvement in the control of lysophosphatidic acid production. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 23131–23136 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Xia, Z. et al. Structural insights into glucose-6-phosphate recognition and hydrolysis by human G6PC1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 122, e2418316122 (2025).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Spiegel, S. & Milstien, S. Sphingosine-1-phosphate: an enigmatic signalling lipid. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4, 397–407 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shirzad-Wasei, N. et al. Rapid transfer of overexpressed integral membrane protein from the host membrane into soluble lipid nanodiscs without previous purification. Biol. Chem. 396, 903–915 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ritchie, T. K. et al. Chapter Eleven - Reconstitution of membrane proteins in phospholipid bilayer nanodiscs. Methods Enzymol. 464, 211–231 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Grant, T. & Grigorieff, N. Measuring the optimal exposure for single particle cryo-EM using a 2.6 Å reconstruction of rotavirus VP6. eLife 4, e06980 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang, N. et al. Structural basis of human monocarboxylate transporter 1 inhibition by anti-cancer drug candidates. Cell 184, 370–383 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chen, S. et al. High-resolution noise substitution to measure overfitting and validate resolution in 3D structure determination by single particle electron cryomicroscopy. Ultramicroscopy 135, 24–35 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 213–221 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the Cryo-EM Center of the University of Science and Technology of China for EM facility support and to the staff members at the Cryo-EM Center for their technical support in cryo-EM data collection. This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2024YFA1307900 to H.Q.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32271241 to H.Q.), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK9100000031 to H.Q.), the ‘Talent Fund Project of Biomedical Sciences and Health Laboratory of Anhui Province, University of Science and Technology of China’ (BJ9100000003 to H.Q.), start-up funding from the University of Science and Technology of China (KY9100000034 and KJ2070000082 to H.Q.), the Anhui Provincial Health and Wellness Scientific Research Projects (AHWJ2023BAc20032 to C.S.) and the Young Scientific and Technological Talent Development Program of Anhui Medical University Affiliated Hospital (2023cy022 to C.S.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.Q. conceived the project and designed the experiments. M.Y. and C.S. performed cloning and protein purification. M.Y. prepared the cryo-EM samples and collected the data. H.Q. determined the structures. M.Y. performed the enzymatic assay. All authors contributed to the data analysis and preparation of the manuscript. H.Q., M.Y., Y.H. and C.S. prepared the figures, and H.Q. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongwu Qian.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Chemical Biology thanks David N. Brindley, Daohua Jiang and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Purification and functional validation of human LPP1.

a, Representative size exclusion chromatography (SEC) profile of human LPP1 (hLPP1) solubilized with 0.005% LMNG. The peak fractions (15.5–17.5 ml) were concentrated for cryo-EM sample preparation. Inset: SDS‒PAGE analysis of the concentrated protein used for cryo-EM sample preparation. b, Schematic diagram of our enzymatic assay for hLPP1. The release of the phosphate group was detected using a modified malachite green-ammonium molybdate method, which forms a molybdophosphoric acid complex with absorption at 630 nm. This image was created with BioRender.com (https://BioRender.com/). c, Phosphate release catalyzed by wild-type (WT) and mutated LPP1 using phosphatidic acid (PA), lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), and sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) as substrates. Mutations at His171 and His223, essential catalytic residues, result in almost loss of catalytic activities. In this experiment, the reaction mixtures for all three substrates were incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. Data are presented as mean values ± s.d. of three independent experiments, each with two technical repeats (n=6). d, Initial rates of phosphate release, catalyzed by purified WT hLPP1, were measured at varying concentrations of PA and S1P. The enzyme was analyzed with the surface dilution kinetic model, and the apparent Km and Vmax values are indicated above the curves. Data are presented as means ± s.d. for three technical repeats (n=3). e, A representative micrograph and 2D class averages of cryo-EM samples of LPP1 in LMNG micelles. Similar images were obtained across all five datasets, resulting in the acquisition of over 5,000 micrographs. The box size for 2D averages is approximately 210 Å. The experiments in a, c, and d were repeated more than three times with similar results.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Flowchart for structural determination.

a, Flowchart of data processing. See Methods for details. b, c, Gold standard Fourier shell correlation (GSFSC) curves (b) and angular distribution maps (c) for the final reconstructions. d, Local resolution maps for the final reconstructions. The maps were calculated using cryoSPARC and generated with Chimera. The unit for resolutions is Å.

Extended Data Fig. 3 EM maps of representative structural elements in LPP1.

a, Membrane topology of LPP1 based on our structure. The C1, C2, and C3 motifs are distinctly colored brown, deep blue-green, and marine, respectively, and a glycosylation site is marked with an asterisk. This image was created with BioRender.com (https://BioRender.com/). b, EM maps of representative structural elements. The EM maps, contoured at 5σ, are generated based on the LPP1-R structure. c, Schematic elucidation of the coordination of PAE and PAI at the tetrameric interface. The residues from different protomers are distinguished by light blue and wheat words. The figures were prepared with LigPlot+. d, SEC profiles of enzymes with mutations related to tetramerization. e, Functional verification of the importance of the residues that engage in tetramerization using PA and S1P as substrates, respectively. Data are presented as the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments, each with two technical repeats (n=6). Significant differences were determined with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests. f, SDS-PAGE analysis of LPP1 variants in panel e and Fig. 2i. CB, Coomassie blue staining; WB, immunoblotting analysis with Strep antibody.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Isolation and functional validation of LPP heterooligomers.

a, Sequence alignment of human LPP1, LPP2, and LPP3 highlights the conservation of essential residues involved in tetramerization and the coordination of PAE, PAI, and PIP2 lipids. These residues are indicated by blue squares, purple circles, red circles, and red triangles, respectively. The C1, C2, and C3 loops are marked with brown, deep blue-green, and marine boxes, respectively. b, Structural overlay of the LPP1 structure with the Alphafold2-predicted models of LPP2 and LPP3. The Alphafold2-predicted models were downloaded from the UniProt database (https://www.uniprot.org/). c, Immunoblotting analysis demonstrated successful isolation of LPP1-LPP2, LPP1-LPP3, and LPP2-LPP3 heterooligomers. The representative blots shown here are from three independent experiments. Please refer to the Methods section for details. d, SEC analysis of these heterooligomers suggests that they exhibit similar oligomeric states. e, Functional assays confirmed that these LPP heterooligomers retain the ability to dephosphorylate LPA, PA, and S1P. In this experiment, the enzymatic systems were incubated at 37 °C for 20 min prior to quantification using the malachite green-ammonium molybdate method. Data are presented as the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments, each with two technical repeats (n=6).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Structural comparison of LPP1 structures and E. coli PgpB.

a, Two opposite views illustrating the superimposition of hLPP1 with E. coli PgpB (PDB code: 4PX7). The transmembrane segments TM2-6 of LPP1 align perfectly with those of PgpB. However, LPP1-TM1 is positioned opposite to that of PgpB. b, When superimposing hLPP1 with E. coli PgpB, PgpB-TM1 conflicts with the adjacent protomer in the LPP1 tetramer. c, SEC profiles of enzymes with mutations on essential residues involved in vanadate coordination. d, Comparison of the extra densities within the catalytic cavities of LPP1-C2M and LPP1-C3M. The extra densities are contoured at 3σ, 4σ, and 6σ, respectively. Notably, the phosphate head group is not connected with the remaining part when modeling LPA into the extra density in LPP1-C3M. This observation suggests that LPA molecules may have been hydrolyzed into PO4 and MAG in LPP1-C3M. e, EM maps for PO4 and MAG molecules in the LPP1-C3M structure. The extra densities are contoured at 5σ. f, SEC profiles of enzymes with mutations related to the coordination of MAG. g, Functional verification of the essential residues involved in MAG coordination using PA and S1P as substrates. Bottom, SDS-PAGE analysis of these LPP1 variants. CB, Coomassie blue; WB, immunoblotting analysis with Strep antibody. Data are presented as the mean ± s.d. of three independent experiments, each with two technical repeats (n=6). Significant differences were determined with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 LMNG-like densities in the hydrophobic pocket.

a, Functional verification of His31 and Lys161 residues using LPA, PA and S1P as substrates. Data are presented as the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments, each with two technical repeats (n=6). Significant differences were determined with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests. b, SEC profiles of enzymes with H31A and K161A mutations. c, Some extra densities are observed within a hydrophobic pocket in the vicinity of the catalytic cavity in all four structures. The catalytic and hydrophobic cavities are marked with yellow and red ellipses, respectively. The extra densities in the pocket are contoured at 4σ. Notably, these extra densities in LPP1-C3M align well with an LMNG molecule. d, EM maps of the LMNG molecule are contoured at 3σ. The LMNG molecules are shown as white sticks and balls. e, SEC profiles of LPP1-C3M reconstituted into nanodiscs. The peak fractions were concentrated for cryo-EM sample preparation. Inset: SDS‒PAGE analysis of the concentrated protein used for cryo-EM sample preparation. f, Map overlay of LPP1-C3M structures in detergent and nanodisc environments. Insets: Zoomed-in views to show the extra densities at the catalytic cavities of LPP1-C3M in detergent and nanodisc environments. Both MAG and LMNG molecules are absent in the LPP1-C3M structure in the nanodisc.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 PIP2 binding is required for LPP1 function.

a, EM maps of PIP2 molecules in these four structures. The densities are contoured at 5σ in the LPP1-R, LPP1-C2M, and LPP1-C3M structures, and at 3σ in the LPP1-C3M structure. The PIP2 molecules are represented as black sticks and balls. b, SEC profiles of enzymes with mutations on essential residues involved in PIP2 coordination. c, Functional verification of essential residues involved in PIP2 coordination using PA and S1P as substrates. Data are presented as the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments, each with two technical repeats (n=6). Significant differences were determined with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons tests. d, SDS-PAGE analysis of LPP1 variants in panel c and Fig. 6e. CB, Coomassie blue staining; WB, immunoblotting analysis with Strep antibody. The representative blots shown here are from more than three independent experiments. e, Mechanistic model of LPP1-mediated dephosphorylation of LPA. LPP1 catalyzes the dephosphorylation of LPA via a ‘ping-pong’ mechanism. Step 1: the C2 histidine (His171) facilitates the cleavage of the phosphate bond, and the C3 histidine acts as a nucleophile to form a phosphohistidine intermediate with the cleaved phosphate. Subsequently, the first product, MAG, is released. Step 2: a water molecule enters the catalytic cavity and hydrolyzes the phosphohistidine intermediate, resulting in the release of the 2nd product, inorganic phosphate. The structures we present here likely capture the major intermediate states of Step 1, from substrate binding to the formation of the phosphohistidine intermediate.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 S1P hydrolysis is sensitive to interprotomer coupling.

a, Some conserved residues in the C1, C2, and C3 loops participate in tetramerization and coordinating PAE molecules. In LPP1-A, the catalytic cavity is marked with a dotted circle, and the interfaces with LPP1-B and LPP1-D are indicated with black dotted lines. b, The chemical structures of LPA and S1P. The major differences are indicated with red dotted ellipses. c, The SEC profiles for the purification of the LPP1-WT&H223A chimera. Inset: Immunoblotting analysis demonstrates successful isolation of WT&H223A chimera. These experiments were conducted at least three times and the results shown here are the representative of those trials. d, Functional examination of the ability of the WT&H223A chimera to hydrolyze LPA, PA, and S1P. The WT&H223A chimera exhibits normal activities to hydrolyze LPA and PA but an obvious reduction in the dephosphorylation of S1P. These biochemical characterizations suggest that S1P hydrolysis is coupled between adjacent protomers, whereas LPA and PA hydrolysis are more independent for each protomer. WT+H223A, a mixture of WT and H223A enzymes after purification. In this experiment, 0.01 µg of enzymes was used to dephosphorylate LPA and PA at 37 °C for 10 min, whereas 0.03 µg of enzymes was employed to hydrolyze S1P at 37 °C for 20 min due to the relatively lower activity of the enzymes. Data are presented as the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments, each with two technical repeats (n=6).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Structural comparison between LPP1-C3M and G6PC1.

a, Two perpendicular views illustrate the structural superimposition of LPP1-C3M and G6PC1 (PDB: 9J7U). Inset: Zoomed-in views highlighting key essential elements within the catalytic cavities. b, Separate views displaying the electrostatic surface potentials of LPP1-C3M and G6PC1. The middle section presents zoomed-in views of the catalytic cavities of LPP1-C3M and G6PC1. The clashes between G6P and the LPP1-C3M cavity are indicated. The G6PC1 cavity lacks sufficient space to accommodate the hydrophobic tails of the LPP1 substrates. c, Functional assays indicate that LPP1 exhibits low activity in dephosphorylation of glucose 6-phosphate (G6P). Data are presented as the means ± s.d. of three independent experiments, each with two technical repeats (n=6).

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Tables 1 and 2

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

The source data used to determine the Km and Vmax values are listed in Supplementary Table 1.

Supplementary Data 2 (download XLSX )

The sequences of primers used in this study.

Supplementary Video 1 (download MP4 )

The conformational changes of the catalytic cavity. The movie was generated based on the structures of LPP1-R, LPP1-C2M, LPP1-C3M and LPP1-V. To ensure seamless transition in the movie, the alanine substitutions at histidine residues in the C2M (H171A) and C3M (H223A) structures were reverted to histidine.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3 (download PDF )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 3 (download XLSX )

Unprocessed western blots and gels.

Source Data Fig. 4 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 6 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 1 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3 (download PDF )

Unprocessed western blots and gels.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4 (download PDF )

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5 (download PDF )

Unprocessed western blots and gels.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7 (download PDF )

Unprocessed western blots and gels.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 8 (download PDF )

Unprocessed western blots.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 9 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, M., Sun, C., He, Y. et al. Structural basis for the catalytic mechanism of human lipid phosphate phosphatases. Nat Chem Biol (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-025-02121-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-025-02121-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing