Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
African swine fever outbreaks in German pig holdings – experiences, epidemiological considerations and genome sequences
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 29 January 2026

African swine fever outbreaks in German pig holdings – experiences, epidemiological considerations and genome sequences

  • Katja Schulz1 na1,
  • Sten Calvelage2 na1,
  • Lisa Rogoll1,
  • Franz J. Conraths3,
  • Christoph Staubach1,
  • Kerstin Albrecht4,
  • Ronny Marquart4,
  • Jennifer Kühn4,
  • Annett Rudovsky4,
  • Dieter Brunklaus5,
  • Gerald Stumpf6,
  • Jeannine Gruse7,
  • Jörn Gethmann1,
  • Sandra Blome2 &
  • …
  • Carola Sauter-Louis1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Diseases
  • Genetics
  • Microbiology

Abstract

Until December 2025, 18 African swine fever outbreaks have occurred in domestic pig holdings in Germany. However, nine of them emerged in western Germany in 2024, representing a separate spatial and temporal cluster. Thus, the current study is limited to the remaining nine outbreaks. We aimed to illustrate the epidemiological background of each of the nine outbreaks. The assessments included the results of the outbreak investigations and of the genome sequencing. This is the first study to provide a detailed overview of these outbreaks and, in particular, to publish the genome sequences involved. In several outbreaks, a connection to the neighboring affected wild boar population was considered likely. The hypotheses were supported by genome sequencing; thus, the study has underscored the benefit of including results of genome sequencing in the evaluation of disease epidemiology. However, outbreaks also occurred on farms without reported cases in wild boar in the vicinity. Similarly, outbreaks were observed in farms with low biosecurity standards but also in farms with very high biosecurity, emphasizing the difficulty to identify a pattern in the outbreaks. Still, it has to be acknowledged that a consistent and sustained compliance with biosecurity measures represents the most important factor in preventing virus introduction.

Similar content being viewed by others

African swine fever outbreaks in China led to gross domestic product and economic losses

Article 27 September 2021

The first genotype II African swine fever virus isolated in Africa provides insight into the current Eurasian pandemic

Article Open access 22 June 2021

Complete genome analysis of African swine fever virus genotypes II, IX and XV from domestic pigs in Tanzania

Article Open access 31 March 2023

Data availability

The original data used for the analyses can be obtained from the author after approval by the responsible institutions of the affected federal states. The assembled whole-genomes were submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA, European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK) under the project accession PRJEB89459.

References

  1. Oļševskis, E. et al. African swine fever virus introduction into the EU in 2014: experience of Latvia. Res. Vet. Sci. 105, 28–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.01.006 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Smietanka, K. et al. African swine fever Epidemic, Poland, 2014–2015. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 22, 1201–1207. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2207.151708 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nurmoja, I. et al. Development of African swine fever epidemic among wild Boar in Estonia - two different areas in the epidemiological focus. Sci. Rep. 7, 12562. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12952-w (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pautienius, A. et al. Prevalence and Spatiotemporal distribution of African swine fever in Lithuania, 2014–2017. Virol. J. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-1090-8 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. World Organisation for Animal Health. African swine fever (ASF) – Situation report 30. https://www.woah.org/app/uploads/2023/03/asf-report30.pdf (2023).

  6. Sauter-Louis, C. et al. Joining the club: first detection of African swine fever in wild Boar in Germany. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 00, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13890 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cadenas-Fernández, E., Ito, S., Aguilar-Vega, C., Sánchez-Vizcaíno, J. M. & Bosch, J. The role of the wild Boar spreading African swine fever virus in asia: another underestimated problem. Front. Veterinary Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.844209 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jori, F. et al. In Understanding and Combatting African Swine Fever - A European Perspective 197–228 (Wageningen Academic, 2021).

  9. European Food Safety Authority. African swine fever and outdoor farming of pigs. EFSA J. 19, e06639. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6639 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nurmoja, I. et al. Epidemiological analysis of the 2015–2017 African swine fever outbreaks in Estonia. Prev. Vet. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.001 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gogin, A., Gerasimov, V., Malogolovkin, A. & Kolbasov, D. African swine fever in the North Caucasus region and the Russian federation in years 2007–2012. Virus Res. 173, 198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2012.12.007 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boklund, A. et al. Risk factors for African swine fever incursion in Romanian domestic farms during 2019. Sci. Rep. 10, 10215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66381-3 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lamberga, K., Serzants, M. & Ojsevskis, E. African swine fever outbreak investigations in a large commercial pig farm in latvia: a case report. Berl Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 132, 151–155. https://doi.org/10.2376/0005-9366-18031 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zani, L. et al. African swine fever in a Bulgarian backyard Farm—A case report. Veterinary Sci. 6, 94 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vergne, T., Gogin, A. & Pfeiffer, D. U. Statistical exploration of local transmission routes for African swine fever in pigs in the Russian Federation, 2007–2014. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 64, 504–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12391 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Malakauskas, A. et al. African swine fever outbreaks in Lithuanian domestic pigs in 2019. Anim. (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010115 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bergmann, H. et al. Identification of risk factors for African swine fever: A systematic review. Viruses 14, 2107 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bellini, S., Casadei, G., De Lorenzi, G. & Tamba, M. A. Review of risk factors of African swine fever incursion in pig farming within the European Union scenario. Pathogens https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10010084 (2021).

  19. Rusinà, A. et al. Semi-Quantitative risk assessment of African swine fever virus introduction in outdoor pig farms. Pathogens 12, 709 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Forth, J. H. et al. African swine fever virus – variants on the rise. Emerg. Microb. Infect. https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2022.2146537 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Carrascosa, A. L., Bustos, M. J. & de Leon, P. Methods for growing and titrating African swine fever virus: field and laboratory samples. Curr. Protoc. Cell. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471143030.cb2614s53 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. den Dunnen, J. T. et al. HGVS recommendations for the description of sequence variants: 2016 update. Hum. Mutat. 37, 564–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22981 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Camacho, C. et al. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform. 10, 421. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-421 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wylezich, C. et al. Next-generation diagnostics: virus capture facilitates a sensitive viral diagnosis for epizootic and zoonotic pathogens including SARS-CoV-2. Microbiome 9 (51). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-020-00973-z (2021).

  26. Giammarioli, M. et al. Complete genome of African swine fever virus genotype II in central Italy. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 12, e0136422. https://doi.org/10.1128/mra.01364-22 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bundesministerium für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft. African swine fever in Germany. https://food.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-07/reg-com_ahw_20220707_asf_deu.pdf (2022).

  28. Viltrop, A., Reimus, K., Niine, T. & Mõtus, K. Biosecurity levels and farm characteristics of African swine fever outbreak and unaffected farms in Estonia; What can be learned from them? Animals 12, 68 (2022).

  29. Mankad, A. Psychological influences on biosecurity control and farmer decision-making. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 36 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0375-9 (2016).

  30. Bucini, G. et al. Connecting livestock disease dynamics to human learning and biosecurity decisions. Front. Vet. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1067364 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Racicot, M., Venne, D., Durivage, A. & Vaillancourt, J. P. Evaluation of the relationship between personality traits, experience, education and biosecurity compliance on poultry farms in Québec, Canada. Prev. Vet. Med. 103, 201–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.08.011 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  32. World Organisation for Animal Health. A field manual for animal disease outbreak investigation and management. (2018).

  33. Gerdes, U. (2024).

  34. Mankad, A. & Curnock, M. Emergence of social groups after a biosecurity incursion. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 38 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-018-0520-8 (2018).

  35. Rogoll, L. et al. Seasonal occurrence of African swine fever in wild Boar and domestic pigs in EU member States. Viruses 15, 1955 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. European Food Safety Authority. Epidemiological analyses of African swine fever in the European union (November 2017 until November 2018). EFSA J. 16, e05494. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5494 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Li, Y. et al. African swine fever in a commercial pig farm: outbreak investigation and an approach for identifying the source of infection. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 67, 2564–2578. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13603 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Guinat, C., Wall, B., Dixon, L. & Pfeiffer, D. U. English pig farmers’ knowledge and behaviour towards African swine fever suspicion and reporting. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161431 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schulz, K., Conraths, F. J., Blome, S., Staubach, C. & Sauter-Louis, C. African swine fever: fast and furious or slow and steady? Viruses-Basel https://doi.org/10.3390/v11090866 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ardelean, F. et al. The course of African swine fever in Romanian backyard holdings - A case report. Veterinary Med. Sci. 7, 2273–2279. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.592 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kim, H. J. et al. Outbreak of African swine fever in South Korea. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 67, 473–475 https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13483 (2020).

  42. Schulz, K. et al. African swine fever re-emerging in estonia: the role of seropositive wild Boar from an epidemiological perspective. Viruses 13, 2121 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully thank Paul Deutschmann, Tessa Carrau-Garreta, Virginia Friedrichs and Jan Hendrik Forth for sample preparation. We also thank Patrick Zitzow, Ulrike Kleinert, Robin Brandt and Nicole Reimer for excellent technical assistance.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Katja Schulz and Sten Calvelage.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Institute of Epidemiology, Greifswald-Insel Riems, 17493, Germany

    Katja Schulz, Lisa Rogoll, Christoph Staubach, Jörn Gethmann & Carola Sauter-Louis

  2. Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Institute of Diagnostic Virology, Greifswald-Insel Riems, 17493, Germany

    Sten Calvelage & Sandra Blome

  3. Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Greifswald-Insel Riems, 17493, Germany

    Franz J. Conraths

  4. State Office for Occupational Safety, Consumer Protection and Health, Department V2 – Animal Disease Prevention and Control, Animal Disease Control Service, 14478, Potsdam, Germany

    Kerstin Albrecht, Ronny Marquart, Jennifer Kühn & Annett Rudovsky

  5. Department of Veterinary Services and Consumer Protection, Emsland District, 49716, Meppen, Germany

    Dieter Brunklaus

  6. Veterinary and Food Inspection Office, District of Rostock, 18273, Güstrow, Germany

    Gerald Stumpf

  7. State Office for Agriculture, Food Safety and Fisheries of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, 18059, Rostock, Germany

    Jeannine Gruse

Authors
  1. Katja Schulz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sten Calvelage
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lisa Rogoll
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Franz J. Conraths
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christoph Staubach
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kerstin Albrecht
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ronny Marquart
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jennifer Kühn
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Annett Rudovsky
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Dieter Brunklaus
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Gerald Stumpf
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jeannine Gruse
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jörn Gethmann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Sandra Blome
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Carola Sauter-Louis
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception, K.S., S.B., S.C. and C.S.-L.; acquisition, K.S., L.R., S.C., S.B., F.J.C., K.A., R.M., A.R., D.B. and J.G.; analysis, K.S. and S.C.; interpretation of data, K.S., S.B., L.R., C.S., K.A., R.M., J.K., A.R., D.B., G.S., J.G. and S.C., and J.G.; original draft preparation, K.S. and S.C.; writing—review and editing, S.B., L.R., F.J.C., C.S., K.A., R.M., A.R., D.B., J.G. and C.S.-L.; supervision, S.B. and C.S.-L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katja Schulz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schulz, K., Calvelage, S., Rogoll, L. et al. African swine fever outbreaks in German pig holdings – experiences, epidemiological considerations and genome sequences. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36441-1

Download citation

  • Received: 08 September 2025

  • Accepted: 13 January 2026

  • Published: 29 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36441-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • African swine fever
  • Outbreak investigations
  • Genome sequencing
  • Domestic pigs
  • Wild boar
  • Epidemiology
Download PDF

Associated content

Collection

Veterinary epidemiology

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology