Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Field pathogenomics and evolutionary conservation unveil CRISPR-targetable susceptibility genes for wheat blast resistance
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 18 January 2026

Field pathogenomics and evolutionary conservation unveil CRISPR-targetable susceptibility genes for wheat blast resistance

  • Abul Khayer1 na1 nAff7,
  • Peng Ye2 na1,
  • Fatiha Sultana Eti1 nAff8,
  • Tahsin Islam Sakif3,
  • Rojana Binte Azad1,
  • Julfikar Ali1,
  • Dipali Rani Gupta1,
  • Soichiro Asuke4,
  • Qinghua Pan5,
  • Mohammad Ali Moni6,9,10,
  • Houxiang Kang2 &
  • …
  • Tofazzal Islam1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1574 Accesses

  • 7 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics
  • Genetics
  • Microbiology
  • Molecular biology
  • Plant sciences

Abstract

Wheat blast, caused by Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum (MoT), threatens global wheat production, yet durable resistance mechanisms remain elusive. Current strategies relying on race-specific resistance genes or fungicides are vulnerable to pathogen evolution and inefficacy. Here, we investigated field-derived transcriptomes from the 2016 Bangladesh wheat blast epidemic, a catastrophic event devastating all local varieties to identify host susceptibility (S) genes co-opted by MoT. By analyzing RNA-seq data from infected and healthy plants across geographically distinct regions, we pinpointed 273 consistently upregulated wheat genes, enriched in defense-related pathways. Ortholog analysis with rice, a model for blast resistance, identified three conserved susceptibility (S)-gene candidates: TaSULTR3-3B (an ortholog of a rice bacterial blight susceptibility gene), TaSTP3-4D (associated with stripe rust), and TaMLO1-5A (a wheat powdery mildew susceptibility gene). While all three candidates exhibited significant expression correlation with M. oryzae Triticum (MoT) effectors in field-derived samples, in planta spike assays revealed distinct expression dynamics. Only TaMLO1-5A was significantly upregulated in the susceptible cultivar BARI Gom 26 following MoT inoculation, with no induction observed in the resistant cultivar S-615 (carrying Rmg8). Conversely, TaSULTR3-3B and TaSTP3-4D did not show significant induction under the specific conditions and time points of the in planta spike assays. This discrepancy potentially arises from tissue-specific regulation (spike vs. leaf), environmental variations, or differences in sampling time points between the field and greenhouse experiments. Disruption of such S genes, validated in other cereals for durable resistance, offers a transformative strategy to engineer non-race-specific wheat blast resilience. Our findings shift the paradigm from transient resistance genes to foundational susceptibility networks, proposing CRISPR-based editing of the candidate gene as an actionable target. This approach, resilient to pathogen evolution, could preempt epidemics in climate-vulnerable regions, safeguarding global wheat security. By bridging field pathogenomics and evolutionary genomics, we provide a roadmap for sustainable disease management in an era of expanding fungal threats.

Data availability

The transcriptomics data for both wheat and blast can be freely accessed on Open Wheat Blast (http://openwheatblast.net/raw-data/). Data that support the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary materials.

References

  1. Latorre, S. M. et al. Genomic surveillance uncovers a pandemic clonal lineage of the wheat blast fungus. PLoS Biol. 21, e3002052. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3002052 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Islam, M. T. et al. Emergence of wheat blast in Bangladesh was caused by a South American lineage of Magnaporthe oryzae. BMC Biol. 14, 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-016-0309-7 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tembo, B. et al. Detection and characterization of Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum causing wheat blast disease on rain-fed wheat in Zambia. PLoS One. 15, e0238724. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238724 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Farman, M. et al. The Lolium pathotype of Magnaporthe oryzae recovered from a single blasted wheat plant in the united States. Plant Dis. 101, 684–692. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-05-16-0700-RE (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barragan, A. C. et al. Wild grass isolates of Magnaporthe (Syn. Pyricularia) spp. From Germany can cause blast disease on cereal crops. BioRxiv 505667. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.29.505667 (2022).

  6. Islam, M. T. et al. Wheat blast: a new threat to food security. Phytopathol. Res. 2, 1–13 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jones, J. D. & Dangl, J. L. The plant immune system. Nature 444, 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05286 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cruz, C. D. & Valent, B. Wheat blast disease: danger on the move. Trop. Plant. Pathol. 42, 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-017-0159-z (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nizolli, V. O. et al. Wheat blast: the last enemy of hunger fighters. Genet. Mol. Biol. 46, e20220002. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2022-0002 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ge, X. et al. Tempered Mlo broad-spectrum resistance to barley powdery mildew in an Ethiopian landrace. Sci. Rep. 6, 29558 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kusch, S. & Panstruga, R. mlo-based resistance: an apparently universal weapon to defeat powdery mildew disease. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 30, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-12-16-0255-cr (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, S. et al. Genome-edited powdery mildew resistance in wheat without growth penalties. Nature 602, 455–460. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04395-9 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Islam, T., Ansary, M. W. R. & Rahman, M. M. Magnaporthe oryzae and its pathotypes: a potential plant pandemic threat to global food security. In Plant Relationships: Fungal-Plant Interactions, 425–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16503-0_18 (Springer, 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nicolas, L. B. et al. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 525–527. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3519 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chowdhury, R. H. et al. Drought-responsive genes in tomato: meta-analysis of gene expression using machine learning. Sci. Rep. 13, 19374 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. EdgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta, D. R. et al. Suitable methods for isolation, culture, storage and identification of wheat blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae triticum pathotype. Phytopathol. Res. 2, 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42483-020-00070-x (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, B., Han, X., Yuan, W. & Zhang, H. TALEs as double-edged swords in plant-pathogen interactions: progress, challenges and perspectives. Plant. Commun. 3, 100318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100318 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Huai, B. et al. TaSTP13 contributes to wheat susceptibility to Stripe rust possibly by increasing cytoplasmic hexose concentration. BMC Plant Biol. 20, 49. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-2248-2 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Römer, P. et al. Promoter elements of rice susceptibility genes are bound and activated by specific TAL effectors from the bacterial blight pathogen, Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae. New Phytol. 187, 1048–1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03217.x (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yuan, T., Li, X., Xiao, J. & Wang, S. Characterization of Xanthomonas oryzae-responsive cis-acting element in the promoter of rice race-specific susceptibility gene Xa13. Mol. Plant. 4, 300–309. https://doi.org/10.1093/mp/ssq076 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen, Y. et al. The role of sugar transporters in the battle for carbon between plants and pathogens. Plant Biotechnol. J. 22, 2844–2858 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ricardo et al. Broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight in rice using genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1344–1350 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garcia-Ruiz, H., Szurek, B. & Van den Ackerveken, G. Stop helping pathogens: engineering plant susceptibility genes for durable resistance. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 70, 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.05.005 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmitt-Keichinger, C. Manipulating cellular factors to combat viruses: a case study from plant eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF4. Front. Microbiol. 10, 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00017 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cernadas, R. A. et al. Code-assisted discovery of TAL effector targets in bacterial leaf streak of rice reveals contrast with bacterial blight and a novel susceptibility gene. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1003972 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Asuke, S. et al. Evolution of wheat blast resistance gene Rmg8 accompanied by differentiation of variants recognizing the powdery mildew fungus. Nat. Plants. 10, 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01711-1 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. O’Hara, T. et al. The wheat powdery mildew resistance gene Pm4 also confers resistance to wheat blast. Nat. Plants. 10, 984–993. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01718-8 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Islam, T. & Azad, R. B. Rmg8 gene against wheat blast. Nat. Plants. 10, 836–837. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-024-01690-3 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kourelis, J. et al. NLR immune receptor–nanobody fusions confer plant disease resistance. Science 379, 934–939. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn4116 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Inoue, Y. et al. Suppression of wheat blast resistance by an effector of Pyricularia oryzae is counteracted by a host specificity resistance gene in wheat. New Phytol. 229, 488–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16894 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Horo, J. T. et al. Effectiveness of the wheat blast resistance gene Rmg8 in Bangladesh suggested by distribution of an AVR-Rmg8 allele in the Pyricularia oryzae population. Phytopathology 110, 1802–1807. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-03-20-0073-R (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Anh, V. L. et al. Rmg8 and Rmg7, wheat genes for resistance to the wheat blast fungus, recognize the same avirulence gene AVR-Rmg8. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19, 1252–1256. https://doi.org/10.1111/mpp.12609 (2018).

  34. Chen, L. Q. et al. Sucrose efflux mediated by SWEET proteins as a key step for phloem transport. Science 335, 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213351 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  35. van Schie, C. C. & Takken, F. L. Susceptibility genes 101: how to be a good host. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 52, 551–581. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-045854 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Saintenac, C. et al. Wheat receptor-kinase-like protein Stb6 controls gene-for-gene resistance to Zymoseptoria tritici. Nat. Genet. 50, 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-018-0051-x (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Babaeizad, V. et al. Over-expression of the cell death regulator BAX inhibitor-1 in barley confers reduced or enhanced susceptibility to distinct fungal pathogens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 118, 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-008-0912-2 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Navia-Urrutia, M. et al. Effector genes in Magnaporthe oryzae triticum as potential targets for incorporating blast resistance in wheat. Plant Dis. 106, 1700–1712. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-10-21-2209-RE (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Castroagudín, V. L. et al. Resistance to QoI fungicides is widespread in Brazilian populations of the wheat blast pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae. Phytopathology. 105, 284–294 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pequeno, D. N. et al. Production vulnerability to wheat blast disease under climate change. Nat. Clim. Change. 14, 1–6 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pallab, B. et al. Management of wheat blast disease in Bangladesh caused by Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum. Plant. Health Cases. phcs20250025. https://doi.org/10.1079/planthealthcases.2025.0025 (2025).

  42. Hasnat, S. et al. Structural insights into AVR-Rmg8 recognition mechanisms by the wheat blast resistance gene. Rmg8 Sci. Rep. 15, 45777. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-28559-5 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sung, Y. C. et al. Wheat tandem kinase RWT4 directly binds a fungal effector to activate defense. Nat. Genet. 57, 1238–1249. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-025-02162-w (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Sophien Kamoun, Thorsten Langner and Joe Win for helpful comments on the manuscript. We are thankful to Professor Yukio Tosa of Kobe University, Japan for generously providing wheat genotype, S-615, carrying Rmg8 blast resistance gene. We are sincerely thankful to the Open Wheat Blast (http://openwheatblast.net/), a unique platform which openly shares the RNA-seq data of both wheat and blast pathogen MoT of Bangladesh epidemic outbreak in 2016.

Funding

This study was funded by the Krishi Gobeshona Foundation, Bangladesh under the OFANS project (Project Code No: FT-92-FNS/21), and a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32261143468). The authors are also thankful to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO), UK for partial funding to the DEWAS: Wheat Blast Diagnostics project (Grant Code: V0156.01).

Author information

Author notes
  1. Abul Khayer

    Present address: Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476, Potsdam-Golm, Germany

  2. Fatiha Sultana Eti

    Present address: Institute for Resistance Research and Stress Tolerance, Julius Kuehn Institute (JKI)-Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Erwin-Baur-Str. 27, 06484, Quedlinburg, Germany

  3. These authors contributed equally: Abul Khayer and Peng Ye.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (IBGE), Gazipur Agricultural University, Gazipur, 1706, Bangladesh

    Abul Khayer, Fatiha Sultana Eti, Rojana Binte Azad, Julfikar Ali, Dipali Rani Gupta & Tofazzal Islam

  2. Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China

    Peng Ye & Houxiang Kang

  3. Extension Service, WVU Plant Diagnostic Clinic, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA

    Tahsin Islam Sakif

  4. Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Kobe University, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan

    Soichiro Asuke

  5. Department of Plant Pathology, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

    Qinghua Pan

  6. AI & Digital Health Technology, Rural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange, NSW, 2800, Australia

    Mohammad Ali Moni

  7. AI and Digital Health Technology, Artificial Intelligence and Cyber Futures Institute, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, NSW, 2795, Australia

    Mohammad Ali Moni

  8. School of Information Technology, Washington University of Science and Technology, Alexandria, VA, 22314, USA

    Mohammad Ali Moni

Authors
  1. Abul Khayer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Peng Ye
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Fatiha Sultana Eti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tahsin Islam Sakif
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rojana Binte Azad
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Julfikar Ali
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Dipali Rani Gupta
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Soichiro Asuke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Qinghua Pan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mohammad Ali Moni
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Houxiang Kang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Tofazzal Islam
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.K. and T.I. conceived and designed the study. A.K. and T.I.S. collected and curated data sets and performed exploratory analyses. A.K. wrote the code, F.S.E. and T.I.S. performed final analyses. F.S.E., T.I.S. and D.R.G. made figures. H.K. and T.I. designed the in planta transcriptomics experiments. P.Y., R.B.A., and J.A. carried out the in planta experiment. A.K., T.I., S.A., Q.P, M.A.M., H.K., D.R.G., and T.I.S. wrote and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Houxiang Kang or Tofazzal Islam.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khayer, A., Ye, P., Eti, F.S. et al. Field pathogenomics and evolutionary conservation unveil CRISPR-targetable susceptibility genes for wheat blast resistance. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36547-6

Download citation

  • Received: 01 October 2025

  • Accepted: 13 January 2026

  • Published: 18 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36547-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Wheat blast
  • Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum
  • Susceptibility genes
  • Durable blast resistance
  • Global climate change
  • Tendem kinase proteins
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology