Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

npj Urban Sustainability
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. npj urban sustainability
  3. articles
  4. article
Leveraging circular nutrients to improve the sustainability of peri-urban agriculture
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 08 January 2026

Leveraging circular nutrients to improve the sustainability of peri-urban agriculture

  • Angelica Mendoza Beltran1,
  • Susana Toboso-Chavero2,
  • Juan David Arosemena Polo2,
  • Adriana Lucia Romero Lestido3 &
  • …
  • Gara Villalba2,4 

npj Urban Sustainability , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 779 Accesses

  • 10 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Agriculture
  • Environmental sciences
  • Environmental studies

Abstract

Agriculture in the urban periphery (peri-UA) can potentially reduce its environmental impact through nutrient recovery from municipal solid and water waste, promoting local crops and displacing some dependency on imports. Shifting from linear to circular food-supply strategies should systemically consider trade-offs that depend on city-specific factors, such as crop patterns, waste management capabilities, and ecosystem status. We investigate these effects spatially and temporally with a tool based on prospective regionalized life cycle assessment to determine how the local and transboundary impacts of various strategies of nutrient circularity (such as struvite, compost, and recovered ammonium salts) applied to peri-UA areas affect climate change, regionalized marine and freshwater eutrophication, abiotic resource depletion, and water consumption, providing maps reflecting crop yields and impacts to aid urban planners. We illustrate with the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona, where we find that applying compost with current waste management infrastructure can reduce the carbon footprint of peri-UA areas by up to 85%.

Similar content being viewed by others

Comparing the carbon footprints of urban and conventional agriculture

Article 22 January 2024

Leaching the good stuff: nitrogen and phosphorus in real and experimental urban agricultural settings

Article Open access 21 November 2025

Nurturing resilient cities: a systematic literature review of community gardens’ contribution to sustainability, 1992–2021

Article Open access 07 November 2025

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the URBAG-ICTA/URBAG_LCA_tool repository, https://github.com/URBAG-ICTA/URBAG_LCA_tool/tree/main.

Code availability

The underlying code for this study is available in URBAG-ICTA/URBAG_LCA_tool and can be accessed via this link https://github.com/URBAG-ICTA/URBAG_LCA_tool/tree/main.

References

  1. Hawes, J. K. et al. Comparing the carbon footprints of urban and conventional agriculture. Nat. Cities https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-023-00023-3 (2024).

  2. Boyce, J., Sacchi, R., Goetheer, E. & Steubing, B. A prospective life cycle assessment of global ammonia decarbonisation scenarios. Heliyon 10, e27547 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Trimmer, J. T. & Guest, J. S. Recirculation of human-derived nutrients from cities to agriculture across six continents. Nat. Sustain 1, 427–435 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richardson, K. et al. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Sci. Adv. 9, (2023).

  5. Metson, G. S., Brownlie, W. J. & Spears, B. M. Towards net-zero phosphorus cities. npj Urban Sustain. 2, (2022).

  6. Liu, Y., Villalba, G., Ayres, R. U. & Schroder, H. Global phosphorus flows and environmental impacts from a consumption perspective. J. Ind. Ecol. 12, 229–247 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Villalba, G., Liu, Y., Schroder, H. & Ayres, R. U. Global phosphorus flows in the industrial economy from a production perspective. J. Ind. Ecol. 12, 557–569 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P. & Van Woerden, F. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2174.

  9. ESPP. European Sustainable Phosphorus Platform - Catalogue of Nutrient Recovery Technologies. https://www.phosphorusplatform.eu/activities/p-recovery-technology-inventory#recovery-p.

  10. Langemeyer, J., Madrid-Lopez, C., Mendoza Beltran, A. & Villalba Mendez, G. Urban agriculture — A necessary pathway towards urban resilience and global sustainability? Landsc. Urban Plan 210, 104055 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Powers, S. M. et al. Global opportunities to increase agricultural independence through phosphorus recycling. Earths Future 7, 370–383 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tonini, D., Saveyn, H. G. M. & Huygens, D. Environmental and health co-benefits for advanced phosphorus recovery. Nat. Sustain 2, 1051–1061 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Trimmer, J. T., Miller, D. C. & Guest, J. S. Resource recovery from sanitation to enhance ecosystem services. Nat. Sustain 2, 681–690 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Metson, G. S., Feiz, R., Quttineh, N. H. & Tonderski, K. Optimizing transport to maximize nutrient recycling and green energy recovery. Resour., Conserv. Recycling: X 9–10, 100049 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Amann, A. et al. Environmental impacts of phosphorus recovery from municipal wastewater. Resour. Conserv Recycl 130, 127–139 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kogler, A. et al. Systematic evaluation of emerging wastewater nutrient removal and recovery technologies to inform practice and advance resource efficiency. ACS EST Eng. 1, 662–684 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rufí-Salís, M. et al. Can wastewater feed cities? Determining the feasibility and environmental burdens of struvite recovery and reuse for urban regions. Sci. Total Environ. 737, (2020).

  18. Rufí-Salís, M. et al. Increasing resource circularity in wastewater treatment: Environmental implications of technological upgrades. Sci. Total Environ. 838, (2022).

  19. Mogollón, J. M. et al. More efficient phosphorus use can avoid cropland expansion. Nat. Food 2, 509–518 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lessmann, M., Kanellopoulos, A., Kros, J., Orsi, F. & Bakker, M. Maximizing agricultural reuse of recycled nutrients: A spatially explicit assessment of environmental consequences and costs. J Environ Manage 332, (2023).

  21. Harder, R., Wielemaker, R., Molander, S. & Öberg, G. Reframing human excreta management as part of food and farming systems. Water Res. 175, 115601 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lam, K. L., Zlatanovic, L. & van der Hoek, J. P. Life cycle assessment of nutrient recycling from wastewater: A critical review. Water Research 173, 115516 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perera, M. K., Englehardt, J. D. & Dvorak, A. C. Technologies for Recovering Nutrients from Wastewater: A Critical Review. Environ. Eng. Sci. 36, 511–529 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saliu, T. D. & Oladoja, N. A. Nutrient recovery from wastewater and reuse in agriculture: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 19, 2299–2316 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Walling, E. & Vaneeckhaute, C. Greenhouse gas emissions from inorganic and organic fertilizer production and use: A review of emission factors and their variability. J. Environ. Manag. 276, 111211 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Charles, A. et al. Global nitrous oxide emission factors from agricultural soils after addition of organic amendments: A meta-analysis. Agric Ecosyst. Environ. 236, 88–98 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Terrile, R. et al. Urban food waste for soil amendment? Analysis and characterisation of waste-based compost for soil fertility management in agroecological horticultural production systems in the city of Rosario, Argentina. Front Sustain Food Syst. 8, 1338451 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Penuelas, J., Coello, F. & Sardans, J. A better use of fertilizers is needed for global food security and environmental sustainability. Agric Food Secur 12, 5 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, X. et al. Probabilistic evaluation of integrating resource recovery into wastewater treatment to improve environmental sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 1630–1635 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ramaswami, A. et al. An urban systems framework to assess the trans-boundary food-energy-water nexus: Implementation in Delhi, India. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, (2017).

  31. Mendoza Beltran, A. et al. Displaying geographic variability of peri-urban agriculture environmental impacts in the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona: A regionalized life cycle assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 858, 159519 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. van Vuuren, D. P. et al. The Shared Socio-economic Pathways: Trajectories for human development and global environmental change. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 148–152 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  33. AMB. PDU metropolità - Metròpolis Barcelona. https://urbanisme.amb.cat/en/descobrir/pdu-metropolita.

  34. Mayor, Á. et al. Life-cycle assessment and techno-economic evaluation of the value chain in nutrient recovery from wastewater treatment plants for agricultural application. Sci. Total Environ. 892, (2023).

  35. AMB. Area Metropolitana de Barcelona. Ecoparc 1 - Barcelona Zona Franca. https://www.amb.cat/web/medi-ambient/residus/instalacions-i-equipaments/detall/-/equipament/ecoparc-1-barcelona-zona-franca/350026/11818 (2024).

  36. Arosemena, J. D., Toboso-Chavero, S., Adhikari, B. & Villalba, G. Closing the nutrient cycle in urban areas: The use of municipal solid waste in peri-urban and urban agriculture. Waste Manag. 183, 220–231 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Seto, K. C. et al. From Low- To Net-Zero Carbon Cities- To Next Global Agenda. Annu Rev. Environ. Resour. 46, 377–415 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Peñuelas, J. et al. Human-induced nitrogen-phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–10 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Arcas-Pilz, V. et al. Improving the Fertigation of Soilless Urban Vertical Agriculture Through the Combination of Struvite and Rhizobia Inoculation in Phaseolus vulgaris. Front Plant Sci. 12, 952 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Huijbregts, M. et al. ReCiPe 2016: A Harmonized Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method at Midpoint and Endpoint Level Report I: Characterization. https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/2016-0104.pdf (2016).

  41. Mendoza Beltran, A. et al. Mapping direct N2O emissions from peri-urban agriculture: The case of the Metropolitan Area of Barcelona. Sci. Total Environ. 822, 153514 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, L. et al. Applying struvite as a N-fertilizer to mitigate N2O emissions in agriculture: Feasibility and mechanism. J Environ Manage 330, (2023).

  43. Mendoza Beltran, A. et al. When the Background Matters: Using Scenarios from Integrated Assessment Models in Prospective Life Cycle Assessment. J. Ind. Ecol. 24, 64–79 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sacchi, R. et al. PRospective EnvironMental Impact asSEment (premise): A streamlined approach to producing databases for prospective life cycle assessment using integrated assessment models. Renewable Sustain Energy Rev. 160, (2022).

  45. Steubing, B., Mendoza Beltran, A. & Sacchi, R. Conditions for the broad application of prospective life cycle inventory databases. Int J. Life Cycle Assess. 28, 1092–1103 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Baustert, P. et al. Integration of future water scarcity and electricity supply into prospective LCA: Application to the assessment of water desalination for the steel industry. J Ind Ecol https://doi.org/10.1111/JIEC.13272. (2022)

  47. van Oers, L., Guinée, J. B. & Heijungs, R. Abiotic resource depletion potentials (ADPs) for elements revisited—updating ultimate reserve estimates and introducing time series for production data. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 25, 294–308 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Orsini, F. et al. Features and Functions of Multifunctional Urban Agriculture in the Global North: A Review. Front Sustain Food Syst. 4, 1–27 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Padró, R. et al. Assessing the sustainability of contrasting land use scenarios through the Socioecological Integrated Analysis (SIA) of the metropolitan green infrastructure in Barcelona. Landsc. Urban Plan 203, 103905 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  50. ISO. ISO 14040. Environmental Management, Life Cycle Assessment. Principles and Framework. (2006).

  51. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Requirements and Guidelines, (2006). ISO. ISO 14044.

  52. Hellweg, S. & Mila Canals, I. L. Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science (1979) 344, 1109–1113 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Arvidsson, R. et al. Environmental Assessment of Emerging Technologies: Recommendations for Prospective LCA. J. Indust. Eco. 22, 1286–1294 (2018).

  54. Mutel, C. et al. Overview and recommendations for regionalized life cycle impact assessment. Int J. Life Cycle Assess. 24, 856–865 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Verones, F. et al. LC-IMPACT: A regionalized life cycle damage assessment method. J. Ind. Ecol. 24, 1201–1219 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mutel, C. L. & Hellweg, S. Regionalized Life Cycle Assessment: Computational Methodology and Application to Inventory Databases. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 5797–5803 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  57. IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In IPCC (eds. MassonDelmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2021).

  58. Wernet, G. et al. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21, 1218–1230 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Edafo. Edafo. https://edafo.com/.

  60. Muns Agroindustrial. MUNS AGROINDUSTRIAL. https://www.muns.es/.

  61. Mendoza Beltran, A., Villalba, G., & Untereiner, E. URBAG LCA tool. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18131872 (2026).

  62. Stehfest, E. et al. Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0 Model Description and Policy Applications. (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, 2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been made possible thanks to the financial support of the ERC Consolidator Integrated System Analysis of Urban Vegetation and Agriculture (818002-URBAG) and the funding from the research and innovation programme under the H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions PROTEAN project (842460).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sphera Solutions GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany

    Angelica Mendoza Beltran

  2. Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA-UAB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain

    Susana Toboso-Chavero, Juan David Arosemena Polo & Gara Villalba

  3. Cetaqua Barcelona, Crta. Esplugues, 75, 08940, Cornellà de Llobregat, Spain

    Adriana Lucia Romero Lestido

  4. Department of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain

    Gara Villalba

Authors
  1. Angelica Mendoza Beltran
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Susana Toboso-Chavero
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan David Arosemena Polo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adriana Lucia Romero Lestido
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gara Villalba
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Research design: A.M.B and G.V.; Code writing: A.M.B; Data collection and analysis: A.M.B, S.T-C, J.D.A.P, A.L.R.L and G.V.; Writing of manuscript: A.M.B; Supervision: G.V. All authors proof-read the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gara Villalba.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mendoza Beltran, A., Toboso-Chavero, S., Arosemena Polo, J.D. et al. Leveraging circular nutrients to improve the sustainability of peri-urban agriculture. npj Urban Sustain (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-025-00333-6

Download citation

  • Received: 21 March 2025

  • Accepted: 18 December 2025

  • Published: 08 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42949-025-00333-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Content types
  • About the Editors
  • Contact
  • Open Access
  • Calls for Papers
  • Article Processing Charges
  • Editorial policies
  • Journal Metrics
  • About the Partner
  • 5 Questions With Our Editorial Board
  • Editor's Perspective: World Cities Day
  • Editors' Perspective: Urban Transformations
  • Letter from the Editor
  • npj Urban Sustainability Editors Achieve Clarivate's "Highly Cited Researchers 2024" Recognition

Publish with us

  • For Authors and Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

npj Urban Sustainability (npj Urban Sustain)

ISSN 2661-8001 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene