Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Data-driven nitrogen management benchmarks support China’s wheat self-sufficiency by 2030

Abstract

Targeted improvement pathways for crop production are needed to meet growing food demand, but quantitative benchmarks are still lacking in China. Here we establish nitrogen (N) management benchmarks for wheat production at regional-to-country scales using a modified approach outlined by the EU Nitrogen Expert Panel, defined as meeting both the requirements for targeted crop N output and the threshold for N surplus. A large-scale survey of farmers shows that only 20% of China’s wheat harvested area met N management benchmarks. Optimized N management, soil fertility and climatic factors account for 70% of the effect on N management benchmarks; the combination of these contributors is projected to increase China’s wheat harvested area that meets N management benchmarks to 75% by 2030. With this, wheat production would increase by 12%, sufficient to achieve wheat self-sufficiency without imports. We demonstrate how N management benchmarks can be achieved under future climate change scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Fig. 1: N management benchmarks for wheat production.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 2: Current situation of wheat production in China based on a large-scale survey of farmers from 2010 to 2021.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 3: Machine learning models for wheat yield and N surplus and the relative importance of their explanatory variables.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 4: Establishment and development of the FRNM technique and the ISSM technique.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.
Fig. 5: Trajectory of wheat grain yield and agricultural GDP during 1960–2021 and the projected proportion of harvested area meeting N management benchmarks under three scenarios.
The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are available in the article and its Supplementary Information. The historical wheat yield and GDP per capita are available from the National Bureau of Statistics of China (https://data.stats.gov.cn/), and the share of agriculture in GDP is available from the World Bank (https://databank.worldbank.org/). Maps were obtained from the Resource and Environment Data platform (https://www.resdc.cn/DOI/DOI.aspx?DOIID=122). Source data are provided with this paper.

Code availability

The code to replicate the key findings of the paper is available via GitHub at https://github.com/tian123-min/NF24081647.

References

  1. Mueller, N. D. et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490, 254–257 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gu, B. J. et al. Four steps to food security for swelling cities. Nature 566, 31–33 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Erisman, J. W. et al. How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nat. Geosci. 1, 636–639 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang, X. et al. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528, 51–59 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Balmford, A. et al. The environmental costs and benefits of high-yield farming. Nat. Sustain. 1, 477–485 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowles, T. M. et al. Addressing agricultural nitrogen losses in a changing climate. Nat. Sustain. 1, 399–408 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nitrogen Use Efficiency (NUE)—an Indicator for the Utilization of Nitrogen in Agriculture and Food Systems (EU Nitrogen Expert Panel, 2015).

  8. Ding, W. C. et al. Estimating regional N application rates for rice in China based on target yield, indigenous N supply, and N loss. Environ. Pollut. 263, 114408 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ren, K. Y. et al. Optimizing nitrogen fertilizer use for more grain and less pollution. J. Clean. Prod. 360, 132180 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lesiv, M. et al. Estimating the global distribution of field size using crowdsourcing. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 174–186 (2019).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ju, X. T. et al. Reducing China’s fertilizer use by increasing farm size. Glob. Environ. Change 41, 26–32 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mi, X. T., He, G. & Wang, Z. H. Comprehensive nitrogen management techniques for wheat self-sufficiency in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 178, 106026 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo, Y. X. et al. Air quality, nitrogen use efficiency and food security in China are improved by cost-effective agricultural nitrogen management. Nat. Food 1, 648–658 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Norse, D. & Ju, X. Environmental costs of China’s food security. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 209, 5–14 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shahzad, A. N. et al. Crop production in Pakistan and low nitrogen use efficiencies. Nat. Sustain. 2, 1106–1114 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Food and Agriculture Data (FAOSTAT, accessed 20 June 2023); https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data

  17. General Administration of Customs of the People’s Republic of China: Customs Statistics (GAC, accessed 20 June 2023); http://www.customs.gov.cn/

  18. Zhang, C. et al. Nitrogen surplus benchmarks for controlling N pollution in the main cropping systems of China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 6678–6687 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, Z. T. et al. Closing of the yield gap can be achieved without groundwater extraction in Chinese wheat production. Glob. Food Secur. 33, 100630 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zheng, H. F. et al. Effects of super absorbent polymer on crop yield, water productivity and soil properties: a global meta-analysis. Agric. Water Manage. 282, 108290 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, X. H. et al. Emergent constraint on crop yield response to warmer temperature from field experiments. Nat. Sustain. 3, 908–916 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yin, Y. L. et al. A steady-state N balance approach for sustainable smallholder farming. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2106576118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cui, Z. L. et al. Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers. Nature 555, 363–366 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. China Agricultural Outlook (2021–2030) (China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, accessed 20 June 2023); https://agri-outlook.cn/

  25. Ding, Y. X. & Peng, S. Z. Spatiotemporal trends and attribution of drought across China from 1901–2100. Sustainability 12, 1–17 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Olen, S. M. Nitrogen solutions for food security amid fertilizer shortages and climate change. Nat. Sustain. 6, 1155–1156 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Calabi-Floody, M. et al. Smart fertilizers as a strategy for sustainable agriculture. Adv. Agron. 147, 119–157 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lam, S. K. et al. Next-generation enhanced-efficiency fertilizers for sustained food security. Nat. Food 3, 575–580 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. NBSC National Bureau of Statistics: China Statistical Yearbook (China Statistics Press, accessed 20 June 2023); https://data.stats.gov.cn/

  30. Zhao, Y. C. et al. Economics- and policy-driven organic carbon input enhancement dominates soil organic carbon accumulation in Chinese croplands. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4045–4050 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Han, D. R. et al. Large soil organic carbon increase due to improved agronomic management in the North China Plain from 1980s to 2010s. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 987–1000 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nusslein, K. & Dhankher, O. P. Food security needs social-science input. Nature 535, 37 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tilman, D. et al. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418, 671–677 (2002).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kanter, D. R. et al. Nitrogen pollution policy beyond the farm. Nat. Food 1, 27–32 (2020).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ren, C. C. et al. Socioeconomic barriers of nitrogen management for agricultural and environmental sustainability. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 333, 107950 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu, W. et al. Quantifying atmospheric nitrogen deposition through a nationwide monitoring network across China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 12345–12360 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu, L. et al. Decline in atmospheric nitrogen deposition in China between 2010 and 2020. Nat. Geosci. 17, 816 (2024).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ti, C. P. et al. A nitrogen budget of mainland China with spatial and temporal variation. Biogeochemistry 108, 381–394 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bouwman, L. et al. Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900–2050 period. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20882–20887 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Friedman, J. H. Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. Ann. Stat. 29, 1189–1232 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Ma, Y., Woolf, D., Fan, M., Qiao, L. & Lehmann, J. Global crop production increase by soil organic carbon. Nat. Geosci. 16, 1159–1165 (2023).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu, X. et al. Climate Change may interact with nitrogen fertilizer management leading to different ammonia loss in China’s croplands. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 6525–6535 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Greenwell, B. M. pdp: an R package for constructing partial dependence plots. R J. 9, 421–436 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang, Z. L. et al. Nitrogen recommendation for dryland winter wheat by monitoring nitrate in 1 m soil and based on nitrogen balance (in Chinese). Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci. 18, 1388–1397 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Huang, M. et al. Soil testing at harvest to enhance productivity and reduce nitrate residues in dryland wheat production. Field Crops Res. 212, 153–164 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. Cao, H. B. et al. Optimization of nitrogen fertilizer recommendation technology based on soil test for winter wheat on Weibei dryland (in Chinese). Sci. Agric. Sin. 47, 3826–3838 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang, Z. H. & Li, S. X. Nitrate N loss by leaching and surface runoff in agricultural land: a global issue (a review). Adv. Agron. 156, 159–217 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cao, H. B. et al. Tailoring NPK fertilizer application to precipitation for dryland winter wheat in the Loess Plateau. Field Crops Res. 209, 88–95 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. World Development Indicators (World Bank, accessed 20 June 2023); https://databank.worldbank.org/

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge all those who provided farmer survey data and on-farm testing trial data as a part of the national campaign. This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (grant no. 2023YFD1900400, Z.W. and G.H.), the Shaanxi Province Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2024NC2-GJHX-28, G.H.), the China Agricultural Research System (grant no. CARS–3–1–31, Z.W.) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 31902120, G.H.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

G.H., Z.W. and Z.C. designed the study. G.H. and X.M. collected and analysed the data. Z.W. and M.S. preformed the farmer surveys. Z.W., Z.C., W.Q., J.L., Q.Z. and Y.Y. preformed the field experiments. X.M. and G.H. wrote the paper. G.H., Z.W. and Z.C. reviewed the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gang He, Zhaohui Wang or Zhenling Cui.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Food thanks Arvind Kumar and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Flowchart for determining wheat production zone based on N management benchmarks at national and regional scales.

The boundaries for determining crop N output is 150 kg N ha−1 season−1, and N surplus is between 5.96e0.0061×N input and 80 kg N ha−1 season−1 in China. In the spring wheat area of North China, the winter wheat area of North China, the winter wheat area of North China Plain, the winter wheat area of South China, the boundaries for determining crop N output is 115, 115, 175, and 130 kg N ha−1 season−1, and N surplus is between 6.39e0.0059×N input and 85 kg N ha−1 season−1, 6.39e0.0059×N input and 80 kg N ha−1 season−1, 8.60e0.0049×N input and 80 kg N ha−1 season−1, and 4.66e0.0065×N input and 85 kg N ha−1 season−1, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Schematic diagram of the regional N management benchmarks for wheat production in China’s four main regions.

N management benchmarks for wheat in the spring wheat area of North China (SNC, a), winter wheat area of North China (WNC, b), winter wheat area of North China Plain (WNCP, c), and winter wheat area of South China (WSC, d). The targeted crop N output and the upper limits of the N surplus were 115 kg N ha−1 season−1 and 85 kg N ha−1 season−1 in SNC; 115 kg N ha−1 season−1 and 80 kg N ha−1 season−1 in WNC; 175 kg N ha−1 season−1 and 80 kg N ha−1 season−1 in WNCP; 130 kg N ha−1 season−1 and 85 kg N ha−1 season−1 in WSC, respectively. The lower limit of N surplus is a non-fixed constant numerically equal to the unavoidable Nr losses, that is, 6.39e0.0059×N input, 6.39e0.0059×N input, 8.60e0.0049×N input, and 4.66e0.0065×N input in SNC, WNC, WNCP, and WSC, and the corresponding N surplus is 14, 14, 23, and 12 kg N ha−1 season−1, respectively.

Extended Data Fig. 3 Causal effects of explanatory variables on grain yield and N surplus.

The solid lines represent mean partial dependence of predicted grain yield (a–c) and predicted N surplus (d–f) on N fertilizer application rate, SOC, and MAT, and the shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals. P value was obtained from a one-sided permutation test. SOC: soil organic carbon concentration; MAT: mean annual temperature.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Performance of Fertilizer Recommendation based on soil Nutrient Monitoring (FRNM) technique and integrated soil-crop system management (ISSM) technique.

Comparison of wheat grain yield and N surplus between farmer’s practice and FRNM technique (a–b; n = 246), and between farmer’s practice and ISSM technique (c–d; n = 65). “n” indicates the number of site-year field trials on applying FRNM and ISSM techniques. Solid and dashed lines indicate the median and mean, respectively. The box boundaries indicate the 75% and 25% quartiles, and the whisker caps indicate the 95th and 5th percentiles. P values were obtained from two-sided paired t-test, and no adjustments were made for multiple comparisons.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Predicted changes for wheat production and N surplus under three scenarios.

Changes in wheat production and N surplus between scenario 1 and BAU (a, b), between scenario 2 and BAU (c, d), and between scenario 3 and BAU (e, f) in China’s four main wheat production regions (spring wheat area in North China, winter wheat area in North China, winter wheat area in North China Plain, and winter wheat area in South China). Maps from Resource and Environmental Science Data (https://www.resdc.cn/DOI/DOI.aspx?DOIID=122).

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 6 The linear model describing the relationship between wheat grain yield and plant N uptake in China’s four main wheat production regions.

The spring wheat area of North China (a; SNC; n = 140), winter wheat area of North China (b; WNC; n = 547), winter wheat area of North China Plain (c; WNCP; n = 1165), and winter wheat area of South China (d; WSC; n = 929). P values were obtained from a one-sided F-test for the fitting lines, and no adjustments were made for multiple comparisons.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 7 The empirical model describing the relationship between total N input and Nr losses.

The exponential model described the relationship between total N input and N2O emission for the nation (a; n = 689), North China (b; n = 63), North China Plain (c; n = 337), and South China (d; n = 289). The exponential model described the relationship between total N input and NH3 volatilization for the nation (e; n = 454), North China (f; n = 57), North China Plain (g; n = 285), and South China (h; n = 112). The exponential model described the relationship between total N input and \({{\rm{NO}}}_{3}^{-}\) leaching for the nation (i; n = 287), North China (j; n = 48) for North China Plain (k; n = 127), and South China (l; n = 112). Shaded bands represent 95% confidence intervals, and P values were obtained from a one-sided F-test for the fitting lines. No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Geographic location of surveyed data covered 502 counties in China.

Map from Resource and Environmental Science Data (https://www.resdc.cn/DOI/DOI.aspx?DOIID=122).

Extended Data Table 1 Description of crop management techniques for the crop management and wheat production dataset
Extended Data Table 2 Comparison of farmer’s practice with the ISSM technique in different wheat production areas of China

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (download PDF )

Supplementary Figs. 1–4, Tables 1 and 2, and Discussion.

Reporting Summary (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1 (download XLSX )

Data from the CM&WP dataset, the farmer survey dataset and the field experiment dataset.

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data for Fig. 1.

Source Data Fig. 2 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data for Fig. 2.

Source Data Fig. 3 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data for Fig. 3.

Source Data Fig. 4 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data for Fig. 4.

Source Data Fig. 5 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data for Fig. 5.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 3 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 3.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 4 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 4.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 5 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 5.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 6 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 6.

Source Data Extended Data Fig. 7 (download XLSX )

Statistical source data for Extended Data Fig. 7.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mi, X., He, G., Qiu, W. et al. Data-driven nitrogen management benchmarks support China’s wheat self-sufficiency by 2030. Nat Food 6, 692–702 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-025-01197-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-025-01197-w

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene