Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
Hyperuricemia risk in bempedoic acid-treated hyperlipidemic patients
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 01 April 2026

Hyperuricemia risk in bempedoic acid-treated hyperlipidemic patients

  • Po-Hsueh Su1,2,
  • Daniel Hsiang-Te Tsai  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2841-03383,4,
  • Miyuki Hsing-Chun Hsieh3,4,
  • Tharmaraj Vairaperumal5,
  • Edward Chia-Cheng Lai3,4 &
  • …
  • Ping-Yen Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3643-52041,5 

Communications Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Dyslipidaemias
  • Renovascular hypertension

Abstract

Background

Bempedoic acid is an oral cholesterol-lowering medication used to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), particularly in patients who require additional lipid lowering. Clinical trials have shown that bempedoic acid increases serum uric acid levels, but the implications of this effect in real-world clinical practice, including the need for anti-gout treatment, are not well defined.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a large, multi-institutional U.S. electronic health record database. Adult patients with hyperlipidemia who have newly initiated bempedoic acid were compared with those initiating ezetimibe. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics, yielding 7676 patients in each group. The primary outcome was incident hyperuricemia, defined as serum uric acid >7.0 mg/dL. A secondary outcome was initiation of anti-gout therapy.

Results

During 12 months of follow-up, hyperuricemia occurs more frequently in patients treated with bempedoic acid than in those receiving ezetimibe (hazard ratio [HR] 1.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58–2.37; p = 0.008). In contrast, initiation of anti-gout therapy does not differ between groups (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.86–1.29; p = 0.59). Longitudinal changes in lipid parameters, inflammatory markers, and glycemic measures are generally similar between groups.

Conclusions

In real-world clinical practice, bempedoic acid use is associated with a higher incidence of laboratory-defined hyperuricemia compared with ezetimibe, but this increase does not translate into greater use of anti-gout medications. These findings support the continued use of bempedoic acid for additional LDL-C lowering, with awareness of its effect on serum uric acid.

Plain language summary

High cholesterol is a major cause of heart disease, and for some people current medicines aren’t sufficient to lower their cholesterol. Bempedoic acid is a newer drug that can help reduce certain kinds of cholesterol, but it may raise levels of a compound called uric acid, which can lead to a condition known as gout. We studied over 15,000 patients in U.S. healthcare systems to see whether this medicine increases the risk of hyperuricemia or gout compared with ezetimibe. We found that bempedoic acid caused higher uric acid levels, but most patients did not need gout treatment. This means that while uric acid may increase, serious symptoms are uncommon. These findings provide real-world information on how bempedoic acid affects uric acid levels and the need for gout treatment in clinical practice.

Similar content being viewed by others

LDL cholesterol target attainment in cardiovascular high- and very-high-risk patients with statin intolerance: a simulation study

Article Open access 04 January 2024

Development and characterization of liposomal formulations containing sesquiterpene lactones for the treatment of chronic gout

Article Open access 24 March 2024

Prevalence and factors related to hypouricemia and hyperuricemia in schoolchildren: results of a large-scale cross-sectional population-based study conducted in Japan

Article Open access 25 October 2022

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the TriNetX Research Network (TriNetX LLC), but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study and are not publicly available. Researchers may obtain access to the TriNetX platform through institutional subscription and approval by TriNetX.

References

  1. Nelson, R. H. Hyperlipidemia as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease. Prim. Care: Clin. Off. Pract. 40, 195–211 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenblit, P. D. Extreme Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) Risk Recognition. Curr. Diab Rep. 19, 61 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson, P. W. F. et al. Systematic Review for the 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 139, (2019).

  4. Liu, P. Y. Reappraisal of the New Clinical Pathway National Consensus on Lipid Profile in Taiwan 2025: Where Do We Stand Now? Acta Cardiol Sin. 41, 166–168 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stroes, E. S. et al. Statin-associated muscle symptoms: impact on statin therapy—European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel Statement on Assessment, Aetiology and Management. Eur. Heart J. 36, 1012–1022 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Di Minno, A. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9, e016262 (2020).

  7. Mach, F. et al. ESC/EAS Scientific Document Group. 2025 Focused Update of the 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. Eur. Heart J. 46, 4359–4378 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ray, K. K. et al. Safety and Efficacy of Bempedoic Acid to Reduce LDL Cholesterol. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 1022–1032 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yarrarapu, S. N. S. et al. Comprehensive review of statin-intolerance and the practical application of Bempedoic Acid. J. Cardiol. 84, 22–29 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nissen, S. E. et al. Bempedoic Acid and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Statin-Intolerant Patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 1353–1364 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laufs, U. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia and Statin Intolerance. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 8, e011662 (2019).

  12. Biolo, G. et al. Mechanism of action and therapeutic use of bempedoic acid in atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 9, 1028355 (2022).

  13. Richette, P. et al. 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 76, 29–42 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, S. et al. Hyperuricemia and Cardiovascular Disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 25, 700–709 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D’Agostino, R. B., Kannel, W. B., Stepanians, M. N. & D’Agostino, L. C. A comparison between lovastatin and gemfibrozil in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia. Am. J. Cardiol. 69, 28–34 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Davidson, M. H. & Toth, P. P. Comparative effects of lipid-lowering therapies. Prog. Cardiovasc Dis. 47, 73–104 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leung, N., Yip, K., Pillinger, M. H. & Toprover, M. Lowering and Raising Serum Urate Levels: Off-Label Effects of Commonly Used Medications. Mayo Clin. Proc. 97, 1345–1362 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ballantyne, C. M. et al. Role of Bempedoic Acid in Clinical Practice. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 35, 853–864 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. De Filippo, O. et al. Safety and efficacy of bempedoic acid: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 22, 324 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Khan, M. U., Khan, M. Z., Munir, M. B., Balla, S. & Khan, S. U. Meta-analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Bempedoic Acid. Am. J. Cardiol. 131, 130–132 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. FitzGerald, J. D. et al. 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 72, 744–760 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ray, K. K. et al. Association of Uric Acid-Lowering Therapies on Gout Frequency with Bempedoic Acid. Clin. Insights CLEAR Outcomes JACC Adv. 4, 102207 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, X. et al. Novel insights into post-marketing AEs associated with bempedoic acid: a comprehensive analysis utilizing the FAERS database. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2468868. Online ahead of print. (2025).

  24. Wang, J., Tsai, K. W., Lu, C. L. & Lu, K. C. Analyzing clinical laboratory data outcomes in retrospective cohort studies using TriNetX. Biochem. Med. (Zagreb) 35, 030502 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The grant assistance from the National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan, Republic of China is gratefully acknowledged. This study was supported in part by grants from the National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan (NSTC 114-2628-B-006-005-; NSTC 114-2314-B-006-089-MY3), the National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan (NHRI-14A1-CG-CO-04-2225-1) to ECCL and NCKUH-11504005 from National Cheng Kung University Hospital to PYL. Additionally, this research was supported in part by Higher Education Sprout Project, Ministry of Education to the Headquarters of University Advancement at National Cheng Kung University (NCKU). The funders had no role in considering the study design or in the collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing of the report, or decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. From the Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Po-Hsueh Su & Ping-Yen Liu

  2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Madou Sin-Lau Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

    Po-Hsueh Su

  3. School of Pharmacy, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Daniel Hsiang-Te Tsai, Miyuki Hsing-Chun Hsieh & Edward Chia-Cheng Lai

  4. Population Health Data Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Daniel Hsiang-Te Tsai, Miyuki Hsing-Chun Hsieh & Edward Chia-Cheng Lai

  5. Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

    Tharmaraj Vairaperumal & Ping-Yen Liu

Authors
  1. Po-Hsueh Su
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel Hsiang-Te Tsai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miyuki Hsing-Chun Hsieh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tharmaraj Vairaperumal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Edward Chia-Cheng Lai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ping-Yen Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Po-Hsueh Su: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing - original draft, and writing - review & editing. Daniel Hsiang-Te Tsai: Methodology, software, investigation, and formal analysis. Miyuki Hsing-Chun Hsieh: Methodology, software, investigation, and formal analysis. Tharmaraj Vairaperumal: Writing - review & editing. Edward Chia-Cheng Lai: Supervision and acquisition of funding. Ping-Yen Liu: Conceptualization, supervision, and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping-Yen Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent for publication

All the authors listed consent to the submission.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Medicine thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Info (download PDF )

Transparent Peer Review file (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, PH., Tsai, D.HT., Hsieh, M.HC. et al. Hyperuricemia risk in bempedoic acid-treated hyperlipidemic patients. Commun Med (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01545-2

Download citation

  • Received: 21 August 2025

  • Accepted: 11 March 2026

  • Published: 01 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01545-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact
  • Conferences
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Posters
  • Editorial policies

Publish with us

  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Medicine (Commun Med)

ISSN 2730-664X (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing