Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Communications Medicine
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. communications medicine
  3. articles
  4. article
Intratumor heterogeneity in human basal like breast cancer is revealed by single cell molecular subtyping
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 April 2026

Intratumor heterogeneity in human basal like breast cancer is revealed by single cell molecular subtyping

  • Jing Li1 na1,
  • Yuan Gao2 na1,
  • Sirui Zhang1 na1,
  • Shouhui Guo1,
  • Qingzhen Hou1,
  • Shisong Zhang3,4,
  • Weixing Yu5 &
  • …
  • Ke Liu  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-3190-16561 

Communications Medicine , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Breast cancer
  • Computational biology and bioinformatics

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer is a molecularly heterogeneous disease composed of multiple intrinsic subtypes. Recent studies have highlighted the substantial intratumor heterogeneity of breast cancer, wherein malignant cells of distinct intrinsic subtypes co-exist within the same tumor. However, most existing subtyping methods are designed for bulk transcriptomic data and are therefore limited in their ability to resolve such intratumor heterogeneity at single-cell resolution.

Methods

We develop UBS93, a computational framework that enables robust molecular subtyping of both bulk tumor samples and individual breast cancer cells. We rigorously validate UBS93 and demonstrate its superior performance relative to existing approaches, particularly in identifying the highly aggressive Claudin-low subtype.

Results

Applying UBS93 to single-cell RNA sequencing data from human Basal-like breast cancers, we identify the co-existence of Basal-like and Claudin-low cancer cell populations within the same tumor—a form of intratumor heterogeneity previously observed in mouse models with genetically engineered RAS pathway alterations. Further analyses suggest that Claudin-low cancer cells originate from Basal-like population, with down-regulation of transcription factor ELF3 playing a pivotal role in the Basal-like/Claudin-low transition.

Conclusions

Our findings establish UBS93 as a powerful tool for breast cancer subtyping and uncover the intratumor heterogeneity in human Basal-like breast cancer.

Plain language summary

Breast cancer is not a single disease and different subtypes of cancer cells can exist within the same tumor. Most current methods used to classify breast cancer look at tumors as a whole and cannot detect differences between individual cells. In this study, we developed a computational tool called UBS93 which can classify breast cancer using data from either whole tumor or single cells. Using UBS93, we found that two aggressive subtypes can exist together within the same tumor. We also discovered that one subtype may arise from the other through changes in gene activity. These findings improve our understanding of breast cancer diversity and may help guide more precise diagnosis and treatment in the future.

Data availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary information files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The generated HCC70 scRNA-seq data are available at Zenodo57.

Code availability

The code, which can be used to reproduce the figures, is available at GitHub58.

References

  1. Nolan, E., Lindeman, G. J. & Visvader, J. E. Deciphering breast cancer: from biology to the clinic. Cell 186, 1708–1728 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parker, J. S. et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 1160–1167 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herschkowitz, J. I. et al. Identification of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors. Genome Biol. 8, R76 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prat, A. et al. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 12, R68 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rädler, P. D. et al. Highly metastatic claudin-low mammary cancers can originate from luminal epithelial cells. Nat. Commun. 12, 3742 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fougner, C., Bergholtz, H., Norum, J. H. & Sørlie, T. Re-definition of claudin-low as a breast cancer phenotype. Nat. Commun. 11, 1787 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jordan, N. V. et al. HER2 expression identifies dynamic functional states within circulating breast cancer cells. Nature 537, 102–106 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chung, W. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq enables comprehensive tumour and immune cell profiling in primary breast cancer. Nat. Commun. 8, 15081 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Azizi, E. et al. Single-cell map of diverse immune phenotypes in the breast tumor microenvironment. Cell 174, 1293–1308 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karaayvaz, M. et al. Unravelling subclonal heterogeneity and aggressive disease states in TNBC through single-cell RNA-seq. Nat. Commun. 9, 3588 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, C. et al. Chemoresistance evolution in triple-negative breast cancer delineated by single-cell sequencing. Cell 173, 879–893 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Savas, P. et al. Single-cell profiling of breast cancer T cells reveals a tissue-resident memory subset associated with improved prognosis. Nat. Med. 24, 986–993 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gulati, G. S. et al. Single-cell transcriptional diversity is a hallmark of developmental potential. Science 367, 405–411 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bassez, A. et al. A single-cell map of intratumoral changes during anti-PD1 treatment of patients with breast cancer. Nat. Med. 27, 820–832 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pal, B. et al. A single-cell RNA expression atlas of normal, preneoplastic and tumorigenic states in the human breast. The EMBO journal 40, e107333 (2021).

  16. Wu, S. Z. et al. A single-cell and spatially resolved atlas of human breast cancers. Nat. Genet. 53, 1334–1347 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cerami, E. et al. The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. Cancer Discov. 2, 401–404 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gao, J. et al. Integrative analysis of complex cancer genomics and clinical profiles using the cBioPortal. Sci. Signal. 6, pl1 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liberzon, A. et al. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics 27, 1739–1740 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu, G., Wang, L. G., Han, Y. & He, Q. Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. Omics J. Integr. Biol. 16, 284–287 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinform. 12, 323 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Frankish, A. et al. GENCODE: reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D942–d949 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y. & Gu, J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34, i884–i890 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng, G. X. et al. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 14049 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Satija, R., Farrell, J. A., Gennert, D., Schier, A. F. & Regev, A. Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 495–502 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stuart, T. et al. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177, 1888–1902 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hao, Y. et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 293–304 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. The ggplot2 package https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggplot2/index.html.

  31. The pheatmap package https://github.com/raivokolde/pheatmap.

  32. Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hänzelmann, S., Castelo, R. & Guinney, J. GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinform. 14, 7 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Barretina, J. et al. The cancer cell line encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature 483, 603–607 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Greer, Y. E. et al. Mitochondrial matrix protease ClpP agonists inhibit cancer stem cell function in breast cancer cells by disrupting mitochondrial homeostasis. Cancer Res. Commun. 2, 1144–1161 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Daemen, A. et al. Modeling precision treatment of breast cancer. Genome Biol. 14, R110 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Marcotte, R. et al. Functional genomic landscape of human breast cancer drivers, vulnerabilities, and resistance. Cell 164, 293–309 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Weinstein, J. N. et al. The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer Analysis Project. Nat. Genet. 45, 1113–1120 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gambardella, G. et al. A single-cell analysis of breast cancer cell lines to study tumour heterogeneity and drug response. Nat. Commun. 13, 1714 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jovanović, B. et al. Heterogeneity and transcriptional drivers of triple-negative breast cancer. Cell Rep. 42, 113564 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hollern, D. P. et al. B cells and T follicular helper cells mediate response to checkpoint inhibitors in high mutation burden mouse models of breast cancer. Cell 179, 1191–1206 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gendoo, D. M. et al. Genefu: an R/bioconductor package for computation of gene expression-based signatures in breast cancer. Bioinformatics 32, 1097–1099 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pan, C. et al. Research progress of claudin-low breast cancer. Front. Oncol. 13, 1226118 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dias, K. et al. Claudin-low breast cancer; clinical & pathological characteristics. PLoS ONE 12, e0168669 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Li, W. et al. Unraveling the roles of CD44/CD24 and ALDH1 as cancer stem cell markers in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Sci. Rep. 7, 13856 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Reddy, T. P. et al. A comprehensive overview of metaplastic breast cancer: clinical features and molecular aberrations. Breast Cancer Res. 22, 121 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Weigelt, B. et al. Metaplastic breast carcinomas display genomic and transcriptomic heterogeneity [corrected]. Mod. Pathol. 28, 340–351 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pal, B. et al. A single-cell RNA expression atlas of normal, preneoplastic and tumorigenic states in the human breast. EMBO J. 40, e107333 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Creighton, C. J. et al. Residual breast cancers after conventional therapy display mesenchymal as well as tumor-initiating features. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 13820–13825 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pommier, R. M. et al. Comprehensive characterization of claudin-low breast tumors reflects the impact of the cell-of-origin on cancer evolution. Nat. Commun. 11, 3431 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Park, S. & Kwon, Y. The role of ELF3 in metastasis of triple negative breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 28, x34 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kuang, L. & Li, L. E74-like factor 3 suppresses microRNA-485-5p transcription to trigger growth and metastasis of ovarian cancer cells with the involvement of CLDN4/Wnt/β-catenin axis. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 28, 4137–4146 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Zhang, X. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics reveal metastatic CLDN4+ cancer cells underlying the recurrence of malignant pleural effusion in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Clin. Transl. Med. 14, e1649 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Liu, K. et al. Evaluating cell lines as models for metastatic breast cancer through integrative analysis of genomic data. Nat. Commun. 10, 2138 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Park, M. et al. Breast cancer metastasis: mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 6806 (2022).

  57. Liu, K. HCC70 scRNA-seq data. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15482443 (2025).

  58. bioklab. UBS93. GitHub https://github.com/bioklab/UBS93 (2025).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Xiaohui Lin for helping us revise the manuscript. The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Fund 32370715, 82330108), the Science Fund for Distinguished Oversea Young Scholars of Shandong Province (2023HWYQ-015), the Taishan Young Scholar Program of Shandong Province (tsqn202312020), and the Cheeloo Young Scholar Program of Shandong University. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of sponsors.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Jing Li, Yuan Gao, Sirui Zhang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Dataology, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China

    Jing Li, Sirui Zhang, Shouhui Guo, Qingzhen Hou & Ke Liu

  2. Precision Medicine Laboratory for Chronic Non-communicable Diseases of Shandong Province, Institute of Precision Medicine, Jining Medical University, Jining, China

    Yuan Gao

  3. Department of Thoracic and Oncological Surgery, Children’s Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China

    Shisong Zhang

  4. Department of Thoracic and Oncological Surgery, Jinan Children’s Hospital, Jinan, China

    Shisong Zhang

  5. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medicine, Jining Medical University, Jining, China

    Weixing Yu

Authors
  1. Jing Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuan Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sirui Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shouhui Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qingzhen Hou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shisong Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Weixing Yu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Ke Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.L., K.L. conceived the study. J.L. performed the majority of computational analysis, Y.G., W.X.Y. performed all the experimental assays, K.L., S.Z.Z., and W.X.Y. supervised the study. S.R.Z., K.L. revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to writing, reviewing, and editing the manuscript and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shisong Zhang, Weixing Yu or Ke Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Medicine thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Transparent Peer Review File (download PDF )

Supplementary-Material (download PDF )

Description of Additional Supplementary Files (download PDF )

Supplementary Data 1–14 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Data 15 (download ZIP )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Gao, Y., Zhang, S. et al. Intratumor heterogeneity in human basal like breast cancer is revealed by single cell molecular subtyping. Commun Med (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01548-z

Download citation

  • Received: 15 August 2025

  • Accepted: 09 March 2026

  • Published: 13 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01548-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • Reviews & Analysis
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims & Scope
  • Journal Information
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Journal Metrics
  • Editors
  • Editorial Board
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact
  • Conferences
  • Editorial Values Statement
  • Posters
  • Editorial policies

Publish with us

  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Communications Medicine (Commun Med)

ISSN 2730-664X (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer