Accelerated Drug Approval Processes in Oncology

Summary

Accelerated approval processes have become central to bringing novel cancer therapies to patients more rapidly by allowing regulatory decisions on the basis of earlier or less comprehensive data than traditional pathways. These mechanisms, spearheaded by agencies such as the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, include designations like accelerated approval, priority review and conditional marketing authorisation. They often rely on surrogate endpoints—biological or radiological measures reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit—to shorten time to market. Postauthorisation obligations, including confirmatory trials and ongoing safety monitoring, seek to resolve residual uncertainties in efficacy and adverse-event profiles. As oncology increasingly incorporates targeted agents and immunotherapies, expedited pathways balance urgent clinical need against the imperative for rigorous evidence, highlighting global collaboration on regulatory standards and the integration of real-world data to support regulatory and clinical decision-making.

Research from Nature Portfolio

No recent Nature Portfolio content available.

Accelerated Drug Approval Processes in Oncology publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in accelerated drug approval processes in oncology across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Accelerated approval: A regulatory pathway granting early authorisation on the basis of surrogate or intermediate endpoints, contingent on postmarketing confirmatory studies.

Surrogate endpoint: A marker, such as tumour shrinkage or progression-free survival, used in trials as a proxy for direct clinical outcomes like overall survival.

Priority Review: A designation reducing the standard review period for regulatory bodies, aimed at therapies for serious conditions with significant unmet medical need.

Conditional Marketing Authorisation: An approval in the European Union granted on the basis of less complete data, subject to obligations to provide additional evidence post-authorisation.

Confirmatory trial: A post-approval study designed to verify and describe the clinical benefit of a therapy initially authorised under an accelerated or conditional pathway.

References

  1. Trends in utilization of FDA expedited drug development and approval programs, 1987-2014: cohort study. The BMJ (2015).
  2. Assessment of Clinical Trials Supporting US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Novel Therapeutic Agents, 1995-2017. JAMA Network Open (2020).
  3. Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States. Milbank Quarterly (2020).

About these summaries

This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.

Nature Strategy Reports
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions 

When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.

  • Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.

  • Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.

  • Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.

Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.

Nature Masterclasses
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.

Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:

  • Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.

  • Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.

  • Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.

Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.