Behavioral Determinants of Condom Use in HIV Prevention

Summary

Condom use remains a cornerstone of HIV prevention, yet uptake and consistency vary widely across populations. At the individual level, knowledge about HIV transmission, perceived susceptibility, positive attitudes towards condoms and high self-efficacy have been shown to predict both the intention to use condoms and actual use. Social influences such as peer and partner norms, gender power dynamics and interpersonal communication further shape decisions around condom use. Structurally, factors including condom availability, service accessibility, economic constraints and policy environments establish enabling or inhibiting conditions. Behavioural models—such as the Health Belief Model, the Theory of Planned Behaviour and integrated change frameworks—capture how these cognitive, social and contextual elements interact to determine protective sexual behaviours. Globally, interventions that combine peer-led education, youth-friendly services and gender-transformative approaches have demonstrated tangible improvements in uptake. Practical applications include campus condom distribution schemes that leverage social prompts, community outreach that engages religious and health leaders, and multimedia campaigns designed to normalise condom negotiation. Understanding these multilevel determinants is critical for designing tailored programmes that address barriers at every stage from awareness to consistent use.

Research from Nature Portfolio

No recent Nature Portfolio content available.

Behavioral Determinants of Condom Use in HIV Prevention publication trend

The graph below shows the total number of articles in behavioral determinants of condom use in hiv prevention across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).

Technical terms

Self-efficacy: Confidence in one’s own ability to obtain and correctly use condoms.

Subjective norms: Perceptions of peers’ and partners’ expectations regarding condom use.

Perceived behavioural control: Belief in the ease or difficulty of performing condom use consistently.

Multilevel determinants: The combined influence of individual, interpersonal and structural factors on behaviour.

References

  1. Psychosocial determinants of consistent condom use among university students in Sudan: findings from a study using the Integrated Change Model. BMC Public Health (2023).
  2. Adolescent condom use in Southern Africa: narrative systematic review and conceptual model of multilevel barriers and facilitators. BMC Public Health (2021).
  3. Factors associated with consistent condom use: a cross-sectional survey of two Nigerian universities. BMC Public Health (2019).

About these summaries

This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.

Nature Strategy Reports
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions 

When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.

  • Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.

  • Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.

  • Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.

Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.

Nature Masterclasses
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.

Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:

  • Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.

  • Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.

  • Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.

Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.