Biosimilar Insulin Pharmacodynamics in Diabetes Management
Summary
Biosimilar insulins are developed to match the molecular structure and clinical performance of approved insulin analogues, offering more affordable treatment options without compromising efficacy or safety. Understanding pharmacodynamics—the timing, intensity and duration of glucose-lowering action—is critical for optimising dosing regimens and minimising hypoglycaemia. Euglycaemic clamp studies remain the gold standard for quantifying insulin effect by measuring glucose infusion rates under controlled glycaemia. Demonstrating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic equivalence within regulatory margins ensures interchangeability and can enhance global access to basal and rapid-acting insulin therapies. Recent advances focus on refining analytical methods, extending evaluations to diverse populations and exploring long-acting formulations to improve patient outcomes.
Research from Nature Portfolio
Two euglycaemic clamp crossover trials in healthy volunteers have reinforced the biosimilarity of rapid-acting insulin aspart formulations. One study compared a proposed insulin aspart biosimilar to the Japan-approved reference, finding identical peak concentrations and total exposure (INS-Cmax, INS-AUClast) alongside matching glucose infusion rate metrics (GIR‐AUC, GIRmax) within 80–125% equivalence bounds. A parallel investigation in Chinese male subjects evaluated a different aspart biosimilar against a market leader, confirming equivalent absorption profiles, onset of action and glucodynamic potency over a 10-hour clamp. Both trials reported no unexpected adverse events, supporting clinical interchangeability in prandial insulin management.
Biosimilar Insulin Pharmacodynamics in Diabetes Management publication trend
The graph below shows the total number of articles in biosimilar insulin pharmacodynamics in diabetes management across all publications each year (not limited to Nature Index journals).
Technical terms
Biosimilar insulin: A highly similar version of an authorised insulin analogue, matching the reference in structure, function and clinical performance.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): The study of how a drug is absorbed, distributed, metabolised and eliminated by the body.
Pharmacodynamics (PD): The analysis of a drug’s biological effects, including onset, intensity and duration of action.
Euglycaemic clamp: An experimental procedure that maintains constant blood glucose by variable glucose infusion to measure insulin-induced glucose uptake.
Area under the curve (AUC): The integral of a concentration-time or effect-time graph, representing total drug exposure or response.
Immunogenicity: The potential of a therapeutic protein to elicit immune responses, such as anti-insulin antibodies.
References
- Reduction in C-Peptide Levels and Influence on Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Insulin Preparations: How to Conduct a High-Quality Euglycemic Clamp Study. Frontiers in Pharmacology (2021).
- Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity between SAR341402 insulin aspart and Japan-approved NovoRapid in healthy Japanese subjects. Scientific Reports (2021).
- Similar pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new biosimilar and reference insulin aspart in healthy Chinese males. Scientific Reports (2021).
- Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic similarity evaluation between an insulin glargine biosimilar product and Lantus® in healthy subjects: Pharmacokinetic parameters of both parent insulin glargine and M1 were used as endpoints. Frontiers in Pharmacology (2022).
- A comparative evaluation of bioequivalence of Gan & Lee glargine U300 and Toujeo® in Chinese healthy male participants. Frontiers in Endocrinology (2024).
- Efficacy and immunogenicity of insulin biosimilar compared to their reference products: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocrine Disorders (2022).
About these summaries
This Nature Research Intelligence Topic summary is created with the cited references and a large language model. We take care to ground generated text with facts, and have systems in place to gain human feedback on the overall quality of the process in line with our AI principles. We strive to create accurate and useful summaries for people unfamiliar with the research topic and that supports this goal. These pages are a beta release and will be updated as we learn how best to help people gain value from a research topic summary.
Turn complex research questions into confident strategic decisions
When you're under pressure to set direction, justify investment, or understand your competitive position, you need more than raw data — you need trusted insights you can act on.
Benchmark your performance against global peers using robust, methodologically sound analysis.
Combine quantitative metrics with qualitative expert insight to uncover strengths, gaps and emerging opportunities.
Gain tailored, decision-ready recommendations aligned to your strategic priorities.
Talk to us to learn more about our data dashboards and bespoke strategy reports.
Grow research skills, confidence and careers with training built for every stage of the research lifecycle.
Developed with Nature Portfolio journal Editors and internationally renowned experts. Discover three ways to learn:
Self-paced, online courses in convenient bite-sized units, covering key skills across scientific writing, publishing, grant writing, data analysis, and more.
Expert trainer-led workshops with hands-on exercises and real-time feedback across core research skills, delivered via interactive group sessions.
Editor-led workshops combining core principles in writing and publishing, personalised 1:1 feedback from Nature Portfolio Editors and hands-on exercises.
Explore course catalogues and workshop agendas, enquire about the options or request institutional pricing.